Name of Employee: Arlene E. Mendoza Position: Elementary School Teacher I Review Period: Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Division of Malabon City Name of Rater: Riza G. Andrade Position: Elementary School Principal IV Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE*
Teaching- Learning Process (40%) Prepared daily lesson plans including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials
June 2014 to March 2015
20% 5 - All daily lesson plans had the following: objective, subject matter, learning tasks and assignment 4- Had three of the four parts of lesson plan 3 - Had two of the four parts 2 - Had 1 of the four parts 1 - No daily lesson plan prepared
Facilitated learning in class through functional lesson plans, daily logs and innovative teaching strategies
June 2014 to March 2015 15% 5 - The teacher established challenging and measurable goal/s for student learning that is aligned with the Philippine Elementary Learning Competencies (PELC) curriculum with the use innovative teaching aids like Laptop & LCD Projectors 4 - The teacher developed a measurable goal for student learning that is aligned with the Philippine Elementary Learning Competencies (PELC) curriculum with the use 3 - The teacher clearly communicated a focus for
A_Mendoza page2
student learning that is appropriate for students and is aligned with the Philippine Elementary Learning Competencies (PELC) curriculum. 2 - The teacher did not have a clear focus for student learning. 1 - The teacher did not have a clear focus for student learning or the objective is too general to guide lesson planning or the objective is inappropriate for students. Monitored the attendance of the students in the subject area taught June 2014 to March 2015
5% 5 - Attendance checking is systematically carried out daily, reasons for absent were noted and follow-up was made 4 - Attendance checking was systematically carried out daily and reasons for absences were noted 3 - Attendance checking was systematically carried out daily 2 - Attendance checking was carried out twice a week 1 - Attendance checking was carried out once
Student Outcomes (40%) Evaluated 95% of students at the end of every lesson / unit (summative test) June 2014 to March 2015
20% 5 - Class record reflected the bases 100% of the students were evaluated and monitored. 4 - Class record reflected the bases of 98% of the students were evaluated 3 - Class record reflected the bases of 95% of the students were evaluated 2 - Class record reflected the bases of 93% of the students
A_Mendoza page3
were evaluated 1 - Class record reflected the bases of 90% and below of the students were evaluated Conducted remediation program once a week for absentee of Science 5 pupils. June 2014 to March 2015
5% 5 - Remediation program is offered to 90% and above of students who need it based on the weekly attendance. 4 - Remediation program is offered to 85% of students who need it based on the weekly attendance. 3 - Remediation program is offered to 80% of students who need it based on the weekly attendance. 2 - Remediation program is offered to 75% of students who need it based on the weekly attendance. 1 - Reading remediation program is offered to 70% and below of students who need it based on the weekly attendance.
Ensured promotion of 95% student promoted in subject are taught June 2014 to March 2015
15% 5- 100% of students are promoted in the subject are taught 4 - 98% of students are promoted in the subject are taught 3 - 95% of students are promoted in the subject are taught 2 - 75% of students are promoted in the subject are taught 2 - 50% of students are promoted in the subject are taught
Community Visited parents of students needing June 2014 1% 5 - Visited parents trice a month
A_Mendoza page4
Involvement (5%) academic monitoring / follow up to January 2015 4 - Visited parents twice a month 3 - Visited parents once a month 2 - Visited parents once every two month. 1 - No parent visited. Participated in events/activities conducted in the community June 2014 to March 2015
1% 5 - Attended 4 or more events/activities. 4 - Attended 3 events/activities. 3 - Attended 2 events/activities. 2 - Attended 1 event/activity. 1 - No event/activity attended.
3% 5- 130% and above accomplishment with set agreements met 4- 115-129% of planned meetings conducted producing only set agreements and partial accomplishment of these 3- 100-114% of planned meetings conducted producing only set agreements 2- 51-99% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results 1- 50% and below of planned meetings conducted with no results
Professional Growth and Development
15% Participated with the General Parent- Teachers Association (PTA) of the school in their programs/activities as a board member June 2014 to March 2015
5% 5 - Attended 5 activities/programs conducted by the General PTA activities in school 4 - Attended 4 activities/programs conducted by the General PTA activities in school 3 Attended3 activities/programs conducted by the General PTA activities in school 2 - Attended 2
A_Mendoza page5
activities/programs conducted by the General PTA activities in school 1 - Attended 1 activities/programs conducted by the General PTA activities in school
Submitted given reports on SBM (Management and Resources) June 2014 to March 2015
5% 5 - Submit report 3 days ahead of time. 4 - Submit report 2 days ahead of time. 3 - Submit report on time. 2 - Submit report 1 or more days after the deadline. 1 - No report made.
Attended 3 seminars/ SLAC Session/ meeting in school, district, division etc. June 2014 to March 2015
5% 5 - Attend 5 seminars/ LAC Session/ meeting in school, district, division etc., with proper documentation. 4 - Attend 4 seminars/ LAC Session/ meeting in school, district, division etc., with proper documentation. 3 - Attend 3 seminars/ LAC Session/ meeting in school, district, division etc., with proper documentation. 2 - Attend 2 seminars/ LAC Session/ meeting in school, district, division etc., with proper documentation. 1 - Attend 1 seminar/ LAC Session/ meeting in school, district, division etc., with proper documentation.
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned