Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DR ABHISHEK PATHAK
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
ORTHOPAEDICS
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
ANATOMY
NORMAL
NECK SHAFT
ANGLE IS 135
DEGREE
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
ANTEVERSION = 10 ± 7º
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
CALCAR FEMORALE
• Calcar femorale is a
Condensed plate of
bone extending from
lesser trochanter to
greater trochanter
posteromedially
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
TRABECULAR SYSTEM
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
FRACTURE NECK OF FEMUR
Variously called as
• The unsolved fracture
• Fracture of necessity
WHY
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
• EVEN WITH A GOOD REDUCTION AND FIXATION
ABOUT 30% GO INTO NON-UNION / AVN
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
REASONS FOR NON UNION
1. INTRA-ARTICULAR FRACTURE THUS SYNOVIAL
FLUID A DETERRENT TO # UNION
2. VASCULARITY PRECARIOUS
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
BLOOD SUPPLY
• Lateral epiphysel artery
– terminal branch MFC artery
– predominant blood supply
to weight bearing dome of
head
• Artery of ligamentum
teres
– from obturator artery
– supplies anteroinferior
head
• Lateral femoral circumflex
a.
– less contribution than MFC
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
• Three ligaments in this region
1) Ileofemoral
2) Pubofemoral
3) Ischiofemoral
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
• 1575- Ambroise Pare described I/C # neck femur
• 1850- Lagenbeck nails a hip
• 1904- Whitman’s reduction and spica cast
• 1931- Smith-Peterson used his triflanged nail
• 1936- Moore’s pin and Knowle’s pin
• 1943- Moore’s prosthesis
• 1952- Thompson’s prosthesis
• 1960- Charnley’s Total Hip Arthroplasty
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
EPIDEMOLOGY
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
Risk factors include
1. Female sex
2. Alcohol and tobacco use
3. Previous #
4. Low estrogen level
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
MECHANISM
• Low energy trauma in elderly patients
– Direct: Fall on GT or forced ext.
Rotation
– Indirect : Muscle forces overwhelming
bone strength
• High energy trauma : RTA, Fall from
height
• Cyclical loading can cause stress fractures
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
Clinical evaluation
• H/o trivial trauma after which the patient is non
ambulatory
• Pt. with impacted fracture may bear weight
• ½ to 1 cm of shortening
• Limb in mild ext. rotation as compared to normal
limb
• Pain in groin
• Tenderness at the base of Scarpa’s Triangle
• Pain on hip movt.
• Axial tenderness
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
Inguinal
Ligament
Medial border of
adductor longus
Medial border of
sartorius
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
IMAGING
• X-ray pelvis with both hips AP view
• X-ray of affected hip AP and Lateral
view
• Internal rotation AP views
• Tech. Bone Scan
• MRI
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
PAUWELS CLASSIFICATION
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
Garden Classification
I - Incomplete or Impacted
II - Complete no displacement
III - Complete with partial displacement
IV- Complete with total displacement
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
GARDENS CLASSIFICATION
• GARDEN’S TYPE I
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
• GARDEN’S TYPE II
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
• GARDEN’S TYPE III
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
• GARDEN’S TYPE IV
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
SHENTON’S LINE
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
SHENTON’S LINE
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
Goals of treatment
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
• Minimize patient’s discomfort
• Restore hip function
• Allow rapid mobilization by early
reduction and internal fixation so as
to avoid problems of long term
recumbency
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
NON OPERATIVE
TREATMENT
• No place in todays time
• Recommended only for patients who are
at extreme medical risk, moribund or
demented nonambulators
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
TREATMENT
OPTIONS
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
DISPLACED FRACTURE IN
YOUNG ADULTS
• # LESS THAN 3 WEEKS OLD
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
DHS with a derotation screw
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
6.5 mm CCS, optimum 3 in
number
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
FRACTURES IN CHILDREN
• Closed reduction and internal fixation
with
a) Moore’s pin
b) Knowles pin
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
CRITERIA FOR ANATOMIC
REDUCTION
• Garden’s criteria : Trebacular angle
on AP and Lat. view should be within
the range of 160-180 deg.
• Lovetts “LAZY S” criteria
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
FRACTURE > 3 WK. OLD
• OSTEOTOMIES:
McMurray’s Provide arm chair
effect
Valgus angulation
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
1. MUSCLE PEDICLE GRAFT
1. Meyer’s quadratus femoris pedicle
2. Bakshi’s TFL pedicle graft
2. GIRDLESTONE EXCISION
ARTHROPLASTY
3. ARTHRODESIS
4. ORIF WITH FIBULAR GRAFT
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
# N/F IN ELDERLY > 60 YRS
• Physiological age is important.
• HEMIARTHROPLASTY
BIPOLAR PROSTHESIS
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
BIPOLAR PROSTHESIS
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
THR
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
STRESS FRACTURE
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
COMPLICATIONS
• Non union
• AVN
• Limb length dicrepency
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak
http://www.esnips.com/web/apathak