Hampton Patio Door Structural Test

"This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek
and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek
assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or
damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this
report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of
the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results
in this report are relevant only to the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or
service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program."

1

REPORT NUMBER: 100403727TOR-009B SGD
ISSUE DATE: October 31, 2011
EVALUATION CENTER
Intertek
6225 Kenway Drive
Mississauga, Ontario L5T 2L3

RENDERED TO

Sunview Doors Limited
500 Zenway Blvd
Vaughan, Ontario L4H 0S7

\
PRODUCT EVALUATED: Brighton Welded Frame Patio Door
EVALUATION PROPERTY: Physical Tests

Report of Testing for Sunview Doors Limited on the Brighton Welded
Frame Patio Door for compliance to the applicable test requirements of
the following criteria: AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 Standards/
Specifications for windows, doors and unit skylights.

T
E
S
T

R
E
P
O
R
T

Sunview Doors Limited October 31, 2011
Project No. 100403727TOR-009B SGD Page 2 of 30

1 Table of Contents

1 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... 2
2 Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3
3 Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 3
4 Test Sample ........................................................................................................................................ 4
4.1. SAMPLE AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... 4
5 Testing and Evaluation Methods ...................................................................................................... 9
DEVIATION FROM THE TEST STANDARD ............................................................................... 9
5.1 OPERATING FORCE (Clause 5.3.1) .......................................................................................... 9
5.2 AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST (Clause 5.3.2) ................................................................... 9
5.3 WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE TEST (Clause 5.3.3) ................................................. 10
5.4 UNIFORM LOAD TESTS........................................................................................................... 10
5.5 RESISTANCE TO FORCED ENTRY TEST (Clause 5.3.5) ...................................................... 11
5.6 DEGLAZING TEST (Clause 5.3.6.3) ......................................................................................... 12
5.7 THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST (Clause 5.3.6.2) ................................................... 12
6 Testing and Evaluation Results...................................................................................................... 13
6.1 OPERATING FORCE TEST...................................................................................................... 13
6.2 AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST......................................................................................... 13
6.3 WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE................................................................................... 14
6.4 UNIFORM LOAD TESTS........................................................................................................... 14
6.5 FORCED ENTRY RESISTANCE TEST.................................................................................... 15
6.6 DEGLAZING TEST.................................................................................................................... 15
6.7 THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST.............................................................................. 15
5 Conclusion........................................................................................................................................ 16
Appendix A Bill of Materials / Drawings .............................................................................................. 17

Report of Testing for Sunview Doors Limited on the Brighton Welded Frame Patio Door
for compliance to the applicable test requirements of the following criteria:
AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 Standards/ Specifications for windows, doors and
unit skylights.


2 Introduction
Intertek has conducted performance testing for Sunview Patio Doors Limited on a Brighton
Welded Frame Patio Door. The sliding door was submitted to the Intertek laboratory on April 26,
2011. Testing was conducted and evaluated in accordance with AAMA/WDMA/CSA
101/I.S.2/A440-08 Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and unit skylights. This
evaluation began May 10, 2011 and was completed October 12, 2011.

3 Summary

Window Manufacturer: Sunview Doors Limited, 500 Zenway Blvd., Vaughan Ontario L4H 0S7
Type: Vinyl horizontal sliding glass door with one inner operating panel and one
exterior stationary panel.
Model: Brighton Welded Frame Patio Door
Primary Designator: Class R-PG35 Size Tested: 71.3 74.5 in. - SD
Positive Design Pressure (DP) = +2160 Pa (+45 psf)
Negative Design Pressure (DP) = -2160 Pa ( -45 psf)
Secondary Designator:

Water Penetration Test Pressure = 260 Pa (5.25 psf)
Test Completion Date: October 12, 2011
(Refer to the information contained herein for complete test specimen description and detailed test report.)


4 Test Sample
4.1. SAMPLE AND ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION
Overall Size: Width - 1811 mm (71-5/16")
Height - 2018 mm (79-7/16")

Frame: Frame: Extruded rigid vinyl main frame members (Vision Extrusions
Limited Tool No. 2696A) with mitred and welded corners.
Fixed Panel Support: an extruded vinyl fixed panel support (Vision
Extrusions Limited Tool No. 2736) was fitted to the exterior sill,
spanning the length of the fixed panel. The fixed panel support was
affixed to the sill with double sided tape.
Interior Sill Track Pocket Cover: an extruded vinyl snap-in track cover
(Vision Extrusions Limited Tool No. 2724) was fitted to the interior sill
tracks, spanning the entire length of the sill. A circular stainless steel
track cover was snapped in on top of the cover.
Sash Stop: a 76 mm (3") rubber sash stop (Ancaster Plastic Part No.
2152301) was installed on the head adjacent to the exposed jamb.
Fixed Sash Shims: two 121 mm (4-3/4) vinyl extruded shims with a
1/16" 1/2" double sided glazing tape applied to the underside. Each
shim was placed in the exterior channel located 127 mm (5) and 673
mm (26-1/2") from the fixed jamb.
Exterior Cover: an extruded vinyl snap-in track cover (Vision Extrusions
Limited Tool No. 2836) was snap-in into the exposed exterior channel
located on the head and sill. The sill cover was sealed to the sill with
silicone.
Installation: The window frame was installed into a wood buck and
secured with twelve #82-1/2" panhead screws; three on each jamb
located 76 mm (3) from each header and sill, and one at the mid span.
Two screws were located at the header; both located approximately at
the mid span. Four screws were located on the sill, all located
approximately at the mid span. The patio door was sealed to the wood
buck with silicone around the exterior and the interior perimeters.


Panel: Sash Members (jamb stiles and rails): Extruded rigid vinyl members
(Vision Extrusions Limited Tool No. 2698).
Interior panel member (interlock stile): Extruded rigid vinyl members
Exterior panel member (interlock stile): Extruded rigid vinyl members
Corners: Mitred and welded.
The fixed panel was sealed to the frame with silicone at the sill and 100
mm (4") up the fixed jamb on the interior.

Panel Sizes: Operable Size: Width: 905 mm (35-5/8")
Height: 1944 mm (76-1/2")
Fixed Size: Width: 905 mm (35-5/8")
Height: 1937 mm (76-1/4")

Reinforcement: Exterior and Interior Sash Interlock Stile: The interlock stile was
reinforced with a U-shaped galvanized steel measuring 28.4 mm by
32.3 mm by 3 mm thick (1-1/8" 1-1/4" 1/8", (RPM Rollforming)
inserted into the cavity and fastened with three # 81" self-tapping flat
head screws located at 76 mm (3") from each rail and one at the mid
span.
Interior Sash Lock Stile: The interlock stile was reinforced with a U-
shaped galvanized steel measuring 25.8 mm by 32.3 mm by 1.5 mm
thick (1" 1-1/4" 1/16", Orion) inserted into the cavity and fastened by
four #81" self-tapping flat head screws located at 76 mm (3") and 762
mm (30") from each rail.

Locks and Hardware: Lock and Handle: Handle and lock (Fasco Part No. 9300 Series
#M0059) on the operating panel was located at the mid-span of the lock
stile. The exterior and interior handles were fastened to each other with
two #82-1/2" machine screws. The locking mechanism (Fasco Part
No. 9357FG14) was fastened to a metal plate with two #63/8" flat
head screws, and the metal was fastened to the routed opening in the
stile with two #121" flat head screws. A single corresponding keeper
was located on the lock jamb with two #82-1/2" screws.
Rollers: The operating sash travelled on two adjustable tandem rollers
(NAP Part No.: 1197STL-1032) fitted into the channel in the sill rail
located 105 mm (4-1/8") o.c. from the panel edge. The tandem rollers
were fastened to the underside of the sill rail with two #101/2" flat head
screw.
Fixed Sash Clips: Two plastic clips (SIL Plastic Part No. SUNCLIP),
each clip was fastened to the fixed sash jamb stile with a #83/4" pan
head screw, located 140 mm (5-1/2") from each rail. The other end of
the clip was fastened to the jamb with a #82-1/2" flat head screw.


Weather-stripping: The frame head channels were quadruple weather-stripped with a
single-finned pile inserted into each kerf of each channel. The 0.187" x
0.200" high weatherstrip was inserted into the interior kerf of each
channel facing the exterior, and the 0.187" x 0.260" high weatherstrip
was inserted into the exterior kerf of each channel facing the interior.
The frame sill channels were quadruple weather-stripped with a single-
finned pile inserted into each kerf of each channel. The 0.187" x 0.200"
high weatherstrip was inserted into the interior kerf of each channel
facing the exterior and the exterior kerf of exterior channel facing the
interior, and the 0.187" x 0.350" high triple-finned weatherstrip was
inserted into the exterior kerf of interior channel facing the interior.
The frame jamb channels were quadruple weather-stripped with a
single-finned pile inserted into each kert of each channel. The 0.187" x
0.200" high weatherstrip was inserted into the interior kerf of each
channel facing the exterior and the exterior kerf of exterior channel
facing the interior, and the 0.187" x 0.260" high weatherstrip was
inserted into the exterior kerf of interior channel facing the interior.
The operable panel interlock stile was single weatherstrip with a kerf
inserted 0.187" x 0.350" high triple-finned weatherstrip facing the
exterior.
The fixed panel interlock stile was single weatherstrip with a kerf
inserted 0.187" x 0.200" high single-finned weatherstrip facing the
interior.
Four plastic pads (SIL Plastic Part No. SUNPLUG) with a 0.187" x
0.200" high weatherstrip was inserted into each pad kerf. Each pad was
fastened to the each interlock stile with two #61" flat head screws.
Screen is single weather-stripped with a kerf mounted 0.187" x 0.375"
high woven pile installed in the interlock stile kerf.

Drainage: The operable sash glazing cavity was drained to the lower cavity by two
2.3 mm (1/16") diameter holes located 32 mm (1-1/4") from each stile.
The lower cavity was drained to sill channel with two 2.3 mm (1/16")
diameter holes located 16 mm (5/8") from each stile. The same
corresponding drain holes on the bottom rail act as vents on the top rail.
The sill track was drained to interior sill at each ends. Three 32 mm (1-
1/4") slots were notched on the middle leg supporting leg. The slots
were located at the ends, and one at the mid span.
The interior sill channel was drained to the lower cavity with two 6.4 mm
(1/4") diameter holes located 25 mm (1") from each jamb.
The lower cavity was drained to a forward exterior cavity with two 25
mm by 9 mm (1"3/8") slots. Each slot was located adjacent to the
corner weld. The exterior sill channel also drained to the forward
exterior cavity with two 6.4 mm (1/4") diameter holes located 25 mm (1")
from each jamb


Drainage (contd): The forward exterior cavity was drained to the exterior with three 31.4
mm by 5 mm (1-1/4" 3/16") slots. Each slot was located 76 (3) from
each jamb and one at the mid span. Each slot was covered with a weep
cover (SIL Plastic Part No. 109).
The screen channel was drained to the exterior with three 13 mm by 9
mm (1/2"3/8") slots. The slots were located at 127 mm (5") and 660
mm (26") from each jamb.

Glazing Method: Both IG units were laid-in glazed on a 1/16" 1/2" double sided glazing
tape.
Vinyl glass stops (Vision Extrusions Limited Tool No. 2722) retained the
IG units in the sash.
The fixed sash IG unit was supported by two rubber setting blocks on
the interlock stile measuring 19 mm by 25 mm by 3 mm thick (3/4" 1"
1/8"), located 152 mm (6) from each rail.
The sash IG unit was supported by two rubber setting blocks on the
bottom rail measuring 19 mm by 25 mm by 3 mm thick (3/4" 1"
1/8"), located 152 mm (6) from each stile.

Glazing: Factory sealed glazing unit having two sheets of nominally thick 3 mm
tempered glass and a 19.1 mm gap. The panes were separated by an
Edgetech Superspacer. Overall IG thickness was 24.9 mm.

Screen: Frame: Extruded aluminum screen members, with mitred corners held
with a single wheel roller assembly cast aluminum corner bracket with a
65 mm (2-9/16") cut-out for the roller to protrude at the head and sill rail.
Four rollers, two located on each rail.
Mesh: Fibreglass mesh retained by a round plastic spline.
Lock: A screen lock kit was fastened to the screen jamb stile with two
#81/2" flat head screws, located 978 mm (38-1/2") from the bottom
rail. A single corresponding keeper installed on the lock jamb with two
#61/2" pan head screws.
The screen material and components was supplied by Rite Screen.
Installation: The screen was installed into the screen track.

Screen Size: Width - 901 mm (35-1/2")
Height - 1962 mm (77-1/2")


Drawings: Cross Sections: Vision Extrusions Limited Drawing No.:
X107D01, titled Welded Sash/Mech Frame Cross Sections, dated 06-
08-2010
Member Details: Vision Extrusions Limited Tool No.:
2735A, drawing no. F107C13, titled Mechanical Frame (4.875) Welded
Sash, dated 07-02-2010
2736, drawing no. E107C14, titled Mechanical Frame (4.875) Fixed Panel
Support, dated 04-04-2010
2698, drawing no. E107C03, titled Welded/Welded Patio Door Common
Sash, dated 03-24-2010
2701, drawing no. E107C06, titled Welded/Welded Patio Door Exterior
Interlock Fixed Sash, dated 03-24-2010
2700, drawing no. E107C05, titled Welded/Welded Patio Door Interior
Interlock Sash, dated 03-24-2010
2722, drawing no. E107C08, titled Glazing Bead 1.000 I.G Unit, dated
03-24-2010
2836, drawing no. E107C18, titled Sill Pocket Cover, dated 28-06-2010
2724, drawing no. E107C10, titled Patio Door Operable Sash-Roller Track,
dated 07-23-2010
Member Detail: RPM Rollforming Description:
SS Track Cover, undated
Sash Stiffener, undated

Member Detail: Orion Description:
Sash Stiffener, undated


5 Testing and Evaluation Methods
The sliding door (SD) system as described in this report was tested to the R Performance Class
as follows: The sliding door met the Gateway Performance Requirements by virtue of meeting
the higher (optional) performance grades to which it was tested:

Minimum Gateway Test Size: 1800 mm 2000 mm
Maximum Allowable Air Leakage: 1.5 L/sm (0.3 cfm/ft)
Minimum Water Pressure: 140 Pa (2.9 psf)
Minimum Design Pressure: 720 Pa (15.0 psf)
Minimum Structural Pressure: 1080 Pa (22.5 psf)

The sliding door system tested had an overall size of 1811 mm 2018 mm (71-5/16 79-
7/16) which exceeded the minimum Gateway test size. Performance testing was conducted in
order to meet the overall Optional Performance requirements for Water Penetration Resistance
and Uniform Load as follows:

Optional Water Resistance Test Pressure: 260 Pa (5.25 psf)
Optional Design Pressure: 2160 Pa (45 psf)
Optional Structural Test Pressure: 3240 Pa (67.5 psf)

DEVIATION FROM THE TEST STANDARD
Testing was not initiated at the minimum Gateway grade levels for the SD-R class of sliding
doors. As testing was performed in conjunction with other sliding door test standards, the sliding
door system was tested to the Optional Performance Grades of AAMA/WDMA/CSA
101/I.S.2/A440-08. By default, the minimum Gateway requirements were met by virtue of
meeting the requirements at higher test levels.
5.1 OPERATING FORCE (Clause 5.3.1)
The Operating Force test was performed on the panel and latch in accordance with ASTM
E2068-00, Standard Test Method for Determination of Operating Force of Sliding Windows and
Doors.
The forces required to initiate motion of the operable panel from both the fully open and fully
closed positions, as well as the force required to maintain motion to the opposite limits of travel,
were measured. The forces required to open and close the latches were also recorded.
5.2 AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST (Clause 5.3.2)
With the door closed and latched, the Air Leakage Resistance test was performed in
accordance with ASTM E283-04, Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage
Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences
Across the Specimen.
Air infiltration was performed using a test pressures of 75 Pa (1.57 psf). The maximum air
leakage rate was calculated and compared to the allowable air leakage.


5.3 WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE TEST (Clause 5.3.3)
With the door closed and latched, a four-cycle Water Penetration Resistance test was
performed in accordance with ASTM E547-00 Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of
Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Cyclic Static Air Pressure Difference.
The test was performed using the specified pressure differential and a water spray rate of at
least 204 L/m per hour (5.0 US gal/ft per hour). Each cycle consisted of five minutes with the
pressure applied and one minute with the pressure released, during which the water spray was
continuously applied.
5.4 UNIFORM LOAD TESTS
5.4.1 Uniform Load Deflection Test (Clause 5.3.4.2)
A Uniform Load Deflection test was conducted in accordance with ASTM E-330-02
Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls,
and Doors by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference, Procedure A. After a 10 second
pre-load (50% of test load), followed by 1 minute with the pressure released, the Uniform
Load Deflection test was conducted at the specified test pressures for a time of 10
seconds. The test was performed in both the positive and negative directions. Deflection
measurement, including residual deflection, was taken at the mid-span and at both ends
of the vertical stile. After the test loads were released, the door was inspected for failure
or permanent deformation of any part of the door system that would cause any
operational malfunction.

5.4.2 Uniform Load Structural Test (Clause 5.3.4.3)
A Uniform Load Structural was conducted in accordance with ASTM E330-02 Standard
Test Method for Structural Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors
by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference, Procedure A. After a 10 second pre-load
(50% of test load), followed by 1 minute with the pressure released, the sample was
subjected to a Uniform Load Structural test using a specified test pressure for a time of
10 seconds. The test was performed in both the positive and negative directions. After
the test loads were released, the permanent deflections were recorded as well as the
specimen was inspected for failure or permanent deformation of any part of the system
that would cause any operational malfunction.


5.5 RESISTANCE TO FORCED ENTRY TEST (Clause 5.3.5)
The Forced Entry Resistance Test was conducted and evaluated in accordance with Clause
5.3.5 in conjunction with ASTM F842-04 "Standard Test Methods for Measuring the Force Entry
Resistance of Sliding Door Assemblies, Excluding Glass Impact".

5.5.1 Disassembly Test
Using the disassembly tools listed below, all members and/or fasteners that could readily
be removed from the exterior within a time limit of five minutes were removed carefully
so as not to cause collateral damage to the specimen.
- Putty knife 0.6 mm thick by 20 mm wide by 90 mm long (0.024 0.78 3.5)
- Philips or straight non-powered screwdrivers 150 mm (6) long
- Standard slot-type pliers 150 mm (6) long to 175 mm (7") long overall

5.5.2 Type A Sliding Door Assembly Tests
The specimen was tested to a Grade 10 performance level (T
1
= 5 minutes). All test
loads were applied at a rate of 45 N/s (10 lbf/s) and held for a period of 60 seconds. The
test loads used were as shown in the following table:
Grade 10 Loads
Load ID Load (N) Load (lbf)
L1 1334 300
L2 778 175
L3 133 30
L4 222 plus panel weight 50 plus panel weight

Test A1 With the panel in the closed position, a concentrated load of L
1
was applied
from the exterior to the jamb (lock) stile within 75 mm (3") of the lock in a
direction parallel to the plane of the glazing in an opening direction, the load
evenly distributed between the interior and exterior sides of the locking device
so as to minimize rotation.
Test A2 Test A1 was conducted in conjunction with a load of L
2
, applied at the jamb
stile at the lock, in a direction perpendicular to the plane of glazing towards
the interior side of the door.
2
, applied at the jamb
stile at the lock, in a direction perpendicular to the plane of glazing towards
the exterior side of the door.
Test A4 Test A1 was conducted in conjunction with a lifting load of L
4
, applied at the
mid-span of the sill rail, in a direction parallel to the plane of glazing vertically
lifting the panel to the uppermost limit within the confines of the frame.
4
, applied at the mid-
span of the sill rail, in a direction parallel to the plane of glazing vertically
lifting the panel to the uppermost limit within the confines of the frame.
Test A6 (Inside Sliding Panel) Test A4 conducted in conjunction with a load of L
3
,
applied at the corner of the panel meeting stile at the sill rail, to the sill rail
within 75 mm (3") of the corner, in a direction perpendicular to the plane of
glazing towards the interior of the door.


5.5.3 Hardware Manipulation Test
Using the tools for hardware manipulation listed below, an attempt was made to gain
entry by inserting each tool and tool combination so as to contact the locking device from
the exterior. The lock manipulation test was conducted for a time of T
1
by one technician
in a manner so as not to cause collateral damage to the specimen.
- Putty knife 0.6 mm thick by 20 mm wide by 90 mm long (0.024 0.78 3.5)
- Black annealed 16 ga. wire long enough to reach from point of insertion to locking device

5.5.4 Panel Manipulation Test
An attempt was made to open the door, lift, push, pull or otherwise manipulate by hand
from the exterior, the panel to the full confines of the frame. The panel manipulation test
was conducted for a time of T
1
.

5.6 DEGLAZING TEST (Clause 5.3.6.3)
A Deglazing test was conducted in accordance with ASTM E987 Standard Test Methods for
Deglazing Force of Fenestration Products, Test Method A. The test sample was supported,
with the side to which manual force is normally applied to the operating panel facing upward, on
two wooden supports, 51 mm 102 mm (2" 4") located under the glazing within 25.4 mm (1")
of each of the parallel panel members and of sufficient length to extend within 25.4 mm (1") of
each perpendicular panel member. A mechanical stop was used at each corner, placed no
more than 12.7 mm (0.5"), of the test sample to prevent movement when under load. The
hydraulic ram was installed in such a way that it was perpendicular and so the contact shoe of
the ram is within 12.7 mm (0.5") to the panel member being tested as well as making sure the
centreline of the contact shoe corresponds to the centreline of the panel member. A deflection
gauge was placed under the center of the panel and the glazing bite, the contact point of where
the shoe will make contact with the panel member, is marked. The test load is then applied for
30 seconds, making sure the time to apply the required load did not take more than 15 seconds.
The deflection was recorded and the test load was released. The panel member that was under
the test load was removed and the distance from the glazing bite to the edge of the glazing
material, was measured and recorded.

5.7 THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST (Clause 5.3.6.2)
The sliding door frame and panels were not welded at the corners therefore this test exempted
from the requirements of the Thermoplastic Corner weld test.


6 Testing and Evaluation Results
6.1 OPERATING FORCE TEST
Operating Panel Force applied to handle of panel
Maximum measured force to initiate opening: 85 N (19.1 lbf)
Maximum measured force to initiate closing: 38 N (8.5 lbf)
Maximum measured force to maintain motion 32 N (7.2 lbf)

Maximum allowable force to initiate motion 135 N (30 lbf)
Maximum allowable force to maintain motion 90 N (20 lbf)

Latches Force applied to latch
Maximum measured force to operate latch: 15 N (3.4 lbf)

Maximum allowable force required to open/close latches: 100 N (22.5 lbf)
The sliding door MET the US performance requirements for Operating Force Test as
specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08.

6.2 AIR LEAKAGE RESISTANCE TEST
Air Infiltration 75 Pa (1.57 psf)
Net infiltration: 1.93 L/s (4.09 cfm)
Total sliding door area: 3.65 m (39.34 ft)
Infiltration rate: 0.5 L/sm (0.11 cfm/ft)

Maximum allowable air leakage rate: 1.5 L/sm (0.3 cfm/ft)
The sliding door MET the requirement in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 for Air
Leakage Resistance.


6.3 WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE
Water Penetration Resistance - With Screen: During the 24-minute test period, using a
pressure differential of 290 Pa (6.0 psf), there was no water leakage observed.
Water Penetration Resistance - Without Screen: During the 24-minute test period, using
a pressure differential of 260 Pa (5.25 psf), there was no water leakage observed.
The sliding door system met the minimum Gateway Water Penetration Resistance
requirement at 140 Pa (2.9 psf), and the Optional Performance requirement for at 260
Pa (5.25 psf) as specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08.

6.4 UNIFORM LOAD TESTS
Uniform Load Deflection Test
Member Interlock Stile
Span Length 1875 mm (73-7/8)
Allowable Deflection Report only
Positive Load Negative Load Test Pressure
+2160 Pa (+45 psf)* -2160 Pa (-45 psf)*
Maximum Net Deflection 25.19 mm (0.992) 29.86 mm (1.176)
*Note *Test was conducted at 2160 Pa instead of 1920 Pa
Post-test Details After the test loads were released, the sliding door was
inspected and there was found to be no failure or
permanent deformation of any part of the sliding door

Uniform Load Structural Test
Member Interlock Stile
Span Length 1875 mm (73-7/8)
Allowable Deflection (0.4% span) 7.50 mm (0.295)
Positive Load Negative Load Test Pressure
+3240 Pa (+67.5 psf) -2880 Pa (-60 psf)
Residual Net Deflection 1.63 mm (0.064) 3.11 mm (0.122)
Post-test Details After the test loads were released, the sliding door was
inspected and there was found to be no failure or
permanent deformation of any part of the sliding door
The sliding door system met the minimum Gateway Uniform Load Structural Test (150%
of Design Pressure) performance requirements at 1080 Pa (22.5 psf) by virtue of
meeting the Uniform Load Structural optional performance requirement at 3240 Pa (67.5
psf) as specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08.


6.5 FORCED ENTRY RESISTANCE TEST
The sliding door was installed into a wood test buck. The test unit was subjected to a
Grade 10 measured performance for a Type A sliding door system in accordance with
the procedure outlined in ASTM F842-04.
Disassembly Test Within 5 minutes, nothing was removed from the
sliding door and entry was not gained.
Test Comments
A1 No entry
A2 No entry
A3 No entry
A4 No entry
A5 No entry
Type A Sliding Door Assembly Tests
A6 No entry
Hardware Manipulation Test During time T1 entry was not gained.
Panel Manipulation Test During time T1 entry was not gained.
The sliding door achieved met the Grade 10 measured performance rating for Forced
Entry Resistance as specified in ASTM F842-04.

6.6 DEGLAZING TEST
Panel Member
Load
N (lbf)
Measured Deglazement
Maximum
Allowable
Head Rail (Int. Surface) 230 (50) 2.67 mm (0.105)
Sill Rail (Int Surface) 230 (50) 2.92 mm (0.115)
Interlock (Int. Surface) 320 (70) 3.05 mm (0.120)
Lock Stile (Int Surface) 320 (70) 3.18 mm (0.125)
90% of glazing bite
14.0 mm (0.55)

The panel members did not move from its original position, in relation to the glazing material, by
more than 90% of the original glazing bite. There was no glazing breakage and the sliding door
system was not damaged in any way that it would inhibit its normal operation.
The sliding door MET the performance requirements specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA
101/I.S.2/A440-08 for the Deglazing Test.

6.7 THERMOPLASTIC CORNER WELD TEST
Sash - Break did not extend along entire weld line.
Frame - Break did not extend along entire weld line.

The window system MET the performance requirements specified in AAMA/WDMA/CSA
101/I.S.2/A440-08 for Thermoplastic Corner Weld test.


5 Conclusion
The Brighton Welded Frame Patio Door tested to the requirements in accordance with
AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and unit
skylights and achieved the following Performance Designations:

Primary Designator

Class R-PG35 Size Tested: 71.3 74.5 in. - SD

Secondary Designator

Positive Design Pressure = +2160 Pa (+45 psf)
Negative Design Pressure = -2160 Pa ( -45 psf
Water Penetration Test Pressure = 260 Pa (5.25 psf)

Tested by: Mustufa Swalah and Ryan Huynh

INTERTEK

Reported by: _____________________
Ryan Huynh
Physical Testing Services

Reviewed by: _____________________
Claudio Sacilotto
Physical Testing Services

RH/CS/rh


Appendix A Bill of Materials / Drawings

(Bill of Materials and Drawings 13 pages)


Item Description Manufacturer Die # / Part #
1 Extruded Frame Vision Extrusions Limited 2735A
2 Panel Support Vision Extrusions Limited 2736
3 Common Sash Vision Extrusions Limited 2698
4 Exterior Interlock Sash Vision Extrusions Limited 2737
5 Interior Interlock Sash Vision Extrusions Limited 2700
6 Glazing Stop 1" IG Vision Extrusions Limited 2722
7 Sill Pocket Cover Vision Extrusions Limited 2836
8 Sash-Roller Track Vision Extrusions Limited 2724
9 Stainless Steel Track Cover RPM Rollforming ---
10 1-1/8" x 1-1/4" x 1/8" Reinforcement RPM Rollforming ---
11 1" x 1-1/4" x 1/16" Reinforcement Orion ---
12 3" Rubber Sash Stop Ancaster Plastic 2152301
13 Plastic Clip Fixed Sash SIL Plastic SUNCLIP
14 Plastic Dust Plugs SIL Plastic SUNPLUG
15 Weepgate covers S.I.L. Plastic 109
16 Handle Assembly FASCO 9300 Series, #M0059
17 Door Lock FASCO 9357FG14
18 Roller Assembly NAP #1197STL-1032
19 Complete Screen Assembly Rite Screen 6068 Screen
20 1/16" 1/2" double sided glazing tape --- ---
21 0.187" x 0.200" Weatherstrip --- ---
22 0.187" x 0.260" Weatherstrip --- ---
23 0.187" x 0.350" Weatherstrip --- ---
Bill of Materials - Brighton Welded Frame Patio Door


Double Sided Tape












Hampton Patio Door Structural Test

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Hampton Patio Door Structural Test

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

"This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen