Republic of the Philippines

COURT OF APPEALS
Manila
FOURTEENTH DIISION
ARNEL M! "ACUTAN# CA$"!R! SP NO! %%&'(
ET AL!#
Petitione)s# Me*be)s+
DEL CASTILLO#
$ ,e)sus $ ROMILLA$LONTO-# an.
/AR0A# JJ!
HONORA/LE OFFICE OF P)o*ul1ate.+
THE PRESIDENT# ET AL!
Respon.ents! 2222222222222222222222222
33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
R E S O L U T I O N
/AR0A# J!+
After a perusal of petitioners' motion for reconsideration
1
on the
Court's resolution dated August 10, 2007, We find the same to be of merit.
The petition for certiorari is grounded upon the resolutions issued by the
ffice of the !resident dated April 2, 2007
2
and "une 1#, 2007
$
in enforcing
the decision
%
of the &'()*+,C)- dated .arch 10, 200/. !etitioners
posit that the 0uestioned resolutions 1ere issued 1ith gra2e abuse of
discretion because the same purportedly modified, altered or amended a
decision that has already become final and e3ecutory and that such act is
considered in e3cess of 4urisdiction, 4ustifying the issuance of a 1rit of
certiorari.
4HEREFORE, the motion for reconsideration is hereby
"RANTED. The petition for certiorari is hereby REINSTATED.
1 )ollo, pp. 1%$+1/2.
2 5bid., pp. $7+$#.
$ 5bid., p. $6.
% 5bid., pp. %0+//.
CA$"!R! SP No! %%&'( (
R E S O L U T I O N
Without necessarily gi2ing due course to the instant petition,
respondents are hereby re0uired to file their comment 7not a motion to
dismiss8 1ithin ten 7108 days from receipt of notice of this resolution.
)espondents' comment shall be treated as their ans1er to the petition in the
e2ent that the same is gi2en due course.
SO ORDERED!
ROMEO F! /AR0A
Associate 5ustice
WE CONCUR:
MARIANO C! DEL CASTILLO
Associate 5ustice
ARCAN"ELITA M! ROMILLA$LONTO-
Associate 5ustice