11.2.1 - Analyze both the features and the rhetorical (persuasive) devices of different types of public documents, such as policy statements, speeches, or debates, and the way in which authors use those features and devices. 11.2.2 - Analyze the way in which clarity of meaning is affected by the patterns of organization, repetition of the main ideas, organization of language, and word choice in the text. 11.2.4 - Make reasonable assertions about an authors arguments by using elements of the text to defend and clarify interpretations. 11.2.5 - Analyze an authors implicit and explicit assumptions and beliefs about a subject. 11.2.6 - Critique the power, validity, and truthfulness of arguments set forth in public documents, speeches, or essays; their appeal to both friendly and hostile audiences; and the extent to which the arguments anticipate and address reader concerns and counterclaims. 11.3.4 - Analyze ways in which poetry or prose uses imagery, personification, figures of speech, and sounds to evoke readers emotions. 11.3.7 - Analyze the clarity and consistency of political assumptions beliefs, or intentions in a selection of literary works or essays on a topic. 11.3.8 - Analyze the philosophical arguments presented in literary works to determine whether the authors positions have contributed to the quality of each work and the credibility of the characters.
1817-1862 Concord, Massachusetts Middle class, but very well read Harvard graduate Considered a failure by age 28 Lasted 2 weeks as a teacher Gave boring public lectures Proposed to woman but turned down No interest in family business Emerson said he lacked ambition
July 4, 1845 Walden Pond (2 years, 2 months) 2 miles from town Goal: to rediscover the grandeur of nature and the simple life Arrested for refusing to pay poll tax (landed him a night in jail) Refused on principle. He didnt support the Mexican War. He was anti-slavery
Metaphor a figure of speech that makes an imaginative comparison between 2 unlike things Paradox 2 opposing ideas that can be both contradictory and true at the same time. Logical Appeal consists of facts, examples, and well-reasoned arguments Ethical Appeal are arguments based on widely accepted values or moral standards Emotional Appeal consists of language or anecdotes that arouse strong feelings