1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 7
TH
DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE

WRIT PETITION NO.29088 OF 2012 (GM-CC)

BETWEEN:

SRI NARASIMHAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKA KADIRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/O DODDERIMAZRA
GUVVALAHALLI VILLAGE
BANGARPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER

(BY:SRI R.P.SOMASHEKARAIAH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE 560 001.

2. THE THASILDAR
BANGARPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT 563 101.

3. THE DEPUTY SUPER-IN-TENDENT OF POLICE
CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT CELL
KOLAR DISTRICT
KOLAR 563 101. ... RESPONDENTS

(BY:SRI C.JAGADISH, SPL. GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R1-3)



2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ORDER OF THE R2 DATED 1.8.12 UNDER
ANNEXURE-H AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


P.C.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Learned Special Government Advocate
appearing for the respondents at the outset invited my
attention to Section 4-B of the Karnataka Scheduled
Castes, Scheduled Tribes & Other Backward Classes
(Reservation of Appointment, etc.), Act 1990 and
submitted that the order dated 1.8.2012, impugned in
the present writ petition passed by the second
respondent, is appealable.

3. Having confronted with this, learned counsel
for the petitioner prays for the withdrawal of this writ
petition with liberty to file an appeal against the order
dated 1.8.2012.



3
4. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn
with liberty as prayed. If an appeal is filed by the
petitioner within two weeks, the same may be
considered and disposed of in accordance with law
without entering into the issue of limitation.


Sd/-
JUDGE


VGR


4