Response to chaos theory:

Anarchist societies will not force anyone into anarchism(such a system that forced citizens to be
anarchist would not be anarchism). That being said, anyone who would rather be ruled, or would
rather submit to social hierarchy could live in a society containing such. Anarchists to anarchist
society, capitalists to capitalist society, etcetera.

-But what about crime? What about all the crime?

Well, there isn't an easy answer to this question. However, let's examine some of the key reasons
that cause crime in the first place.
-Money
-Oppression
-Class Inequality
-Passion
Anarchism takes three of these four key crime-causers away. Now would an anarchist society be
perfect? Of course not. No society is perfect. (Not even American. Can you believe it?)

-What if people still want to commit crimes?

Well there is more than one answer to this question, also.
One common theory is that the community that this 'crime'-commiter lived in could deny him
treatment or such until he corrected his behavior. Also, it is theorized that education is a very key
factor in preventing crime.

-Will there be any laws?

There will be no state, so there will be no laws. In popular anarchist theory, however, it is said
that each grassroots community would develop it's own community standards(these standards
voted on through a purely direct democracy.) If standards are not met, then the 'crime'-committer
would be either refused treatment or refused the ability to live in that community any longer.

-Will there be even the smallest of authority?

Some anarchists think so. (i.e. Noam Chomsky). They theorize that minute authority figures
would help with the order of anarchist society. However, he has stated that they would have to be
held to explanation of any authority they partake in, and could be 'fired' by group-decision. This is
a topic disagreed on by most anarchists.

IN CONCLUSION, anarchy is not chaos. Anarchy is the RADICAL notion that liberty and
democracy are things that can fully be put into action.