I suggest that the article can be accepted after the following correction have been made:

I- GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
- et al should be put in italics throughout the text. E.g Etxeberria et al. 2012
- The author should review the text for grammatical corrections.

II- Grammatical corrections
Line 1: compositions
Line 2: replace between the with of
Line 7: replace sentence with Essential oils of unripe fruit pulp and leaf are rich in monoterpenes
Line 8: cross out completely
Line 9: Both essential oils exhibit ..
Line 33: used for diabetes treatment. Phenolic and .
Line 35: Since this species is rich in essential . . . .
Line 37: . . . leaves. The Eos of UFP and leaves . . .
Line 52: remove -Cadinol. It is not a key word. Add chemical composition.
Line 62: About 90% of diabetic patients . . .
Line 63: where is the reference for the statement in this line?
Line 81: They have been reported to inhibit the activities of -amylase glucosidase
activities . . .
Line 93: However, the leaves . . . .
Line 102: . . . their use in the food and pharmaceutical . . . .
Line 103: Studies on the chemical . . . .
Line 110. The Monoterpenes . . .
Line 215: Both the oils were . . . .
Line 223: . . . . were present in both the oils. Many minor components . . . . (Cite the
components)
Line 243: Which previous study? Please cite.
Line 270: (2005) have observed . . . . .
Line 330: The study demonstrate that both the EOs are . . . . .
Line 334: . . . . . .activity of both the oils . . . .
Line 335: . . . . . Similarly, both the oils possess . . . .
Line 336: . . . Therefore, both the Eos can . . . .