I appear in favor of the amendments. Congress is no longer bound by its constitutional system of delegated powers. Its only test is under the obligatory power to promote human rights in these fields of endeavor: Civil, political, economic, social and cultural. These are found in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations, a ratified and approved treaty. They are being promoted in all parts of the world by the United Nations. Congress may now legislate as an uninhibited body with no shackles of delegated powers under the Constitution. Our entire system of a government of delegated powers of Congress has been changed to a system of undelegated powers without amendment by the people of the United States. The authority for these statements is found in a volume entitled Constitution of the United States of America, Annotated, issued in 1953, prepared under the direction of the Judiciary Committee of the Senate of the United States and under the chairmanship of Prof. Edward S. Corwin of Princeton, aided by the legal staff of the Library of Congress. This is the conclusion on page 427 of the Annotations: "In a word, the treaty power cannot purport to amend the Constitution by adding to the list of Congress enumerated powers, but having acted, the consequence will often be that it has provided Congress with an opportunity to enact measures which, independently of a treaty, Congress could not pass, and the only question that can be raised as to such measures will be whether they are necessary and proper' measures for the carrying of the treaty in question into operation." It will be noted that one of the principal cases cited is that of the Migratory Bird case. These conclusions are those also of a committee of the New York State Bar Association, of which former Attorney General Mitchell and Mr. John W. Davis were prominent members. Now, for some practical illustration of new-found powers under treaties of what Congress may do: 1. It may enact a comprehensive education bill, providing for education in any State which does not provide it. In fact, it may take over all public education now provided by States and municipalities. 2. It may enact a prohibition act without an amendment of the Constitution. 3. It may enact a uniform divorce act. 4. It may take over all social and welfare services rendered by or through the States or their agencies. 5. It may take over all commerce, all utility rates and service, all labor. The list may be multiplied extensively at your will. The new test of constitutionality will apply to all legislation by Congress since 1945, which deals with any of the five fields of endeavor. Any judge deciding on the validity of legislation must have two books before him -- one, the Constitution of the United States, and the other, the Charter of the United Nations. If he does find authority for the act in the Constitution, he will find it in the Charter. That is the exact situation in which Justice Holmes found himself and the other members of the Supreme Court when they decided the Migratory Bird case. The authority was not found in the Constitution ---it was found in the treaty with Great Britain. The question to be answered is this: Under which form of government do the people of the United States prefer to live? Manifestly, we cannot operate under both. Senators, the people of the United States have given up their sons; they have given up billions of their substance. They should not be the only Nation in the world to give up their form of government -- the wonder of the world -- to discharge their obligations to the people of the world.
Source Congressional Record Page A3220, Statement of Carl B. Rix of Milwaukee Former President of the American Bar Association. Entered into the House Record by the Honorable Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin on May 11, 1955.