Upov Sym Ge 11 5

www.jki.bund.
de
Breeding for virus resistance
in cereals
Frank Ordon
Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance
Acreage of cereals 2009
http://faostat.fao.org
http://www.usinenouvelle.com home.arcor.de https://www.uni-hohenheim.de/qisserver/rds?st...
Wheat - Triticum Barleyyellowdwarf virus, Wheat dwarf virus, Soil-borne wheat mosaic virus,
Wheat spindle streak mosaic virus, Soil-borne cereal mosaic virus, Wheat yellowmosaic virus,
Aubian wheat mosaic virus, Barleyyellowstriate mosaic virus, Indian peanut clumpvirus,
Wheat rosette stunt virus, Wheat American striate virus
Barley - Hordeum Barley yellow dwarf virus, Wheat dwarf virus, Barley mild mosaic virus,
Barley yellow mosaic virus, Barleystripe mosaic virus, Northern cereal mosaic virus,
Barleyyellowstreak mosaic virus, Arabis mosaic virus, Tobacco rattle virus
Rye - Secale Barleyyellowdwarf virus, Wheat dwarf virus, Soil-borne cereal mosaic virus,
Wheat spindle streak mosaic
Triticale - Triticosecale Barleyyellowdwarf virus, Wheat dwarf virus, Soil-borne cereal mosaic virus,
Wheat spindle streak mosaic virus
Oat - Avena Barleyyellowdwarf virus, Oat sterile dwarf virus, Oat golden stripe virus,
Oat chlorotic stunt virus, Oat mosaic virus, Wheat dwarf virus
Corn - Zea Maize dwarf mosaic virus, J ohnsongrass mosaic virus, Sugarcane mosaic virus,
Maize rough dwarf virus, Maize chlorotic mottle virus, Maize chlorotic dwarf virus,
Maize bushystunt virus, Cereal chlorotic mottle virus, Barleyyellowdwarf virus,
Sorghumchlorotic spot virus, High Plains virus, Wheat streak mosaic virus
Rice - Oryza Rice tungro virus, Rice dwarf virus, Rice gall dwarf virus, Rice grassystunt virus,
Rice hoja blanca virus, Rice necrosis mosaic virus, Rice ragged stunt virus,
Rice stripe necrosis virus, Rice yellowmottle virus, Barleyyellowdwarf virus
Sorghum / Millet -
Sorghum/Pennisetum
Maize dwarf mosaic virus, Sorghumyellowbanding virus, Sorghumchlorotic spot virus
Important viruses of Poaceae (Gramineae)
W. Huth
F. Ehrig A.. Habeku u. E. Schliephake Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance
W. Huth
BaMMV, BAMMV-SIL, BaMMV-Teik, BaYMV, BaYMV-2
BaYMV/BaMMV- Yield
Culti var Reaction t/ha relative
Asorbia (6-rowed) resistant 5.33 100
Corona (6-rowed) susceptible 3.53 65
Romanze (2-rowed)resistant 4.20 100
Marinka (2-rowed) susceptible 2.38 57
10 m2 plots, 3 repli cations; LSD (5%) = 0.25 t/ha and 0.35 t/ha; yield in ATM
Yuka (6-rowed) resistant 7.66 100
Grete (6-rowed) susceptible 4.10 54
Duet (2-rowed) resistant 6.30 100
Angora (2-rowed) suceptible 4.24 67
Barley yellow mosaic virus disease
Economic loss caused by BaMMV/BaYMV
Acreage (2010): 1303000 ha
Yield: 6.66 t = 8677980 t
Barley price: 150 per t
Economic value: 1301697000
50% of barley acreage potentially infested (Huth 1988): 651500 ha
Moderate yield loss of 25%: 1074975 t
Economic loss: 161246250
No. Cultivars Yield
Year resistant susceptible resistant susceptible
1986 6 37 4.3* 5.6
1995 24 41 6.5 6.3
2005 52** 23 6.7 6.1
2011 55 9 6.9 6.4
*1=minimum, 9=maximum, List of registered cultivars, Federal Seedboard, different years
**48: rym4 derived from Ragusa
4: rym5 Tokyo (1996): [(Fallon x 13060) x 87-5381 B] x Swift]
Resistant Ym. No.1 x Igri
(Hemker, pers. Comm.)
Genetic base of BaMMV/BaYMV-resistance
BaMMV BaYMV BaYMV-2 No.
Genotypes
Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare
- - - 201
- - + 86
+ - - 53
- + + 43
Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum
- + + 3
- - - 2
- = negative ELISA (resistant), + = positive ELISA ( susceptible)
Ordon et al. 1993, Habekuss et al. 2000
Gtz & Friedt 1993, Ordon & Friedt 1993
F
2
Infect.-
Cross Segregation
2
** rate (%)
r : s 7r:9s
H. vulgare ssp vulgare
Chikurin Ibaraki 1 x Ogra 49 : 69 0.233 98
Russia 57 x Diana 68 : 81 0.214 95
Bulgarian 347 x Diana 61 : 89 0.574 95

Bulgarian 347 x Russia 57 42 : 73 2.442 100
Taihoku A x Chikurin Ibaraki 1 50 : 68 0.091 100
Bulgarian 347 x Chikurin Ibaraki 53 : 63 0.0114 100

Screening for resistance and genetic analysis
H. vulgare
Cultivars
Landraces
H. vulgare ssp.
spontaneum
H. bulbosum
Hordeum sp.
n=30
Identification of genetic
variation
Utilization of
genetic
variation
Prebreeding
Rym15/Rym15(s):2Rym15/rym15(s):rym15/rym15(r)
x Rym15/Rym15
rym15/rym15 (r) x Rym15/rym15 (s)
rym15/Rym15 (s) Sellfing
Resistance test
rym15/Rym15 (s)
Selbstung
P
F1
F2
F1 BC1
F2
Backcrossing procedures
Resistance Test
x Rym15/Rym15
F
1
F
2
F
3
F
4
F
5
F
6
F
7
F
8
F
9
F
10
P1 x P2
Pedigree Selection
Use of genetic variation
Heritability
h
2
=Vg/Vp
Success of selection
R=h
2
xS
D
The better the inference
from the phenotype to the
genotype the higher the
success of selection
Vp=Vg+VE+VgE
Viruses do not incide each year
-
Symptom development is often
influenced by environmental factors
-
- No reliable selection on a single plant
level (A
1
, F
2
)
Reliable selection for resistance on the
phenotypic level can not be carried out
each year
Genotype
Phenotype
Environment
Reliable selection on the single plant level (A
1
, F
2
) in the lab
independently from the incidence of viruses in the field and
symptom development in early developmental stages
3H 1H(5)
100 cM
Chikurin
Ibaraki 1
6H 5H(7) 7H(1) 2H 4H
rym7
rym4
rym5
rym6
rym10
Rym14HB
rym15
rym3
mod. Graner et al. 2000
Rym16HB
rym11
rym1
rym13
rym9
rym8
Mapped resistance genes against BaMMV/BaYMV
s r r s r
E33M56_250 0.0
E36M59_420 15.8
WMS 06 16.5
E43M59_285 21.4
E53M40_154 27.2
OP-C13_900 E51M40_120
GBM 1015
27.8
E53M36_105 28.2
rym13 29.1
HVM 67 33.0
OP-E14_1050 33.7
E56M39_200 36.7
marker
name
distance
cM
r s r s s
r s s r s
Humbroich, K., H. J aiser, A. Schiemann, P. Devaux, A. J acobi,
L. Cselenyi, A. Habekuss, W. Friedt, F. Ordon, 2010.. Plant
Breeding 129, 346-348.
Ordon, F. 2009: Barley Genetics Newsletter 39, 58-69.
WSSMV/SBCMV
SBCMV
WSSMV
AWMV
SBBMV?
WSMV
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
r s
Resistance
F
re
q
u
e
n
z
Savanah x Claire
69r : 57s (Chi2 1r:1s = 1,14)
Wheat SBCMV-Resistance
D. Hariri
C
l
a
i
r
e
M
o
u
l
i
n
A
z
t
e
k
T
r
e
m
i
e
S
a
v
a
n
n
a
h
O
d
e
s
s
k
a
j
a

5
1
T
o
n
i
c
C
a
d
e
n
z
a
154 bp
152 bp
3 alleles identified in about 100
genotypes tested.154bp diagnostic
for Cadenza-derived resistance ,
152 bp for Tremie/Claire-deri ved
resistance . All suceptible
genotypes displayed a null allele.
3 alleles identified in about 100
genotypes tested.154bp diagnostic
for Cadenza-derived resistance ,
152 bp for Tremie/Claire-deri ved
resistance . All suceptible
genotypes displayed a null allele.
Perovic, D., J . Frster, P. Devaux, D. Hariri, M. Guilleroux, K. Kanyuka, R. Lyons, J . Weyen, D.
Feuerhelm, U. Kastirr, P. Sourdille, M. Rder, F. Ordon, 2009. Molecular Breeding 23, 641-653.
Xcfd183 0
Xgwm805 1
Xgwm931 4
Xgpw343 15
Xcfd10 35
AFLP1 39
SbmClaire 48
XSSR1 49
Xwmc765 51
Xbbrc144 59
Xwmc443 63
Xgwm272
67
Xcfe301
68
Xgpw2323
71
Savannah x Cl aire
Chromosome 5DL
F
r
a
n
k
a
A
s
o
r
b
i
a
A
n
s
o
n
B
u
l
g
a
r
i
a
n

3
4
7
M
u
j
u

c
o
v
e
r
e
d

2
T
a
i
h
o
k
u

A
Z
a
i
r
a
i

R
o
k
k
a
k
u
C
h
i
k
u
r
i
n

I
b
a
r
a
k
i

1
O
u

1
0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Yield t/ha
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Score
Yield
Lodging
Winterkilling
R. secalis
6H 5H(7)
BaYMV/
BaYMV-2
6H 5H(7) 6H 5H(7) 6H 5H(7)
rym15
Ordon & Friedt, Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 41: 43-46
rym15/rym15 (r) x Rym15/rym15 (s)
rym15/Rym15 (s) Selfing
Resistance test
x Rym15/Rym15
rym15/Rym15 (s) Selbfing
x Rym15/Rym15
P
F1
F2
F1 BC1
F2
rym15/rym15 (r) x Rym15/Rym15 (s) P
rym15/Rym15 (s) F1
x Rym15/Rym15
Rym15/Rym15 (s) rym15/Rym15 (s)
x Rym15/Rym15
x Rym15/Rym15
x Rym15/Rym15
0
1
2
3
4
5
F1 BC1
F1 BC2
F1 BC3
J
a
h
r
Conventional backcrossing Marker assisted backcrossing
Resistance test
Ordon, F., B. Pellio, K. Werner, A. Schiemann, W. Friedt, A. Graner, 2003. J. Plant Diseases and Protection 110, 287-295.
Marker assisted backcrossing
x
BC
2
Recurrent parent
Donor (R)
x
F
1
Recurrent Parent (S)
R S
x
BC
1
Recurrent Parent
75% 81% 64% 63% 94% 72% Genomic portion
AFLPs
Determination of the genomic
portion of the recurrent parent
Marker assisted backcrossing
9
k

i
S
e
l
e
c
t

C
h
i
p
BaYMV BaYMV-2 BaMMV BaMMV-SIL BaMMV-EIK
rym4 r s r r r
rym5 r r r s s
rym9 s s r r r
rym11 r r r r r
rym4 rym5 rym9 rym11
rym4 x rym9 rym4 x rym11 rym5 x rym11 rym9 x rym11
rym4 x rym9 x rym11 rym5 x rym9 x rym11
rym5 x rym9
Pyramiding of BaMMV/BaYMV Resistance Genes
DH Line
Production
Marker Selection
rym4, rym9 and
rym11 fixed
rym4 and
rym9 fixed
rym4 and
rym11 fixed
rym4 rym4 rym4 rym9 rym9 RYM
9
rym1
1
RYM
11
rym4 rym4 rym4
rym4
rym4 rym9 rym9 rym1
1
rym1
1
rym1
1
RYM
11
RYM
11
RYM
11
RYM
9
RYM
9
RYM
9
A1
rym4
rym4 rym4
rym4 rym4 rym4
rym4
rym4
rym4 rym4
rym4 rym4
rym4
RYM4
rym4 rym4
rym4
rym4 rym4
RYM4
RYM4 RYM4
RYM4
RYM4
RYM4 RYM4
RYM4 RYM4 RYM4
RYM4
rym4
RYM4
RYM4
RYM4 RYM4
RYM4
rym9 rym9
rym9 rym9
rym9 rym9
rym9 rym9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9 RYM9
RYM9
RYM9 RYM9
RYM9
RYM9 RYM9
RYM9
RYM9 RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9 RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
RYM9
rym11
rym11 rym11 rym11 rym11
rym11 rym11
rym11
rym11 rym11
RYM11
RYM4 rym9
RYM11
RYM4
RYM11
rym4
RYM11
RYM11 RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11 RYM11
RYM11
RYM11 RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11
RYM11 RYM11 RYM11 RYM4
RYM9 rym9
x rym4 rym4 RYM11
RYM11 RYM11 RYM9
RYM9
RYM9 RYM4 RYM4
rym9
P
rym4
rym4
RYM9
RYM9
RYM4
RYM4
rym9
rym9
x rym4
rym4
RYM11
RYM11
RYM4
RYM4 rym11
rym11
rym11
F1
F1 X
X X
HVM 67 (rym9) Bmac 29 (rym4)
HVM 03 (rym11)
Werner K, W Friedt, F Ordon, 2005. Mol. Breeding 16: 45-55
Pyramiding of BaMMV/BaYMV Resistance Genes
rym5 x rym9 x rym11
27 of 187 DHs, Chi2 = 2.186
rym4 x rym9 x rym11
20 of 107 DHs, Chi2 = 0.072
4r
4r
9r
9r
11r
11r
5r
5r
9r
9r
11r
11r
rym4 x rym9
31 of 107
DHs
Chi2 =7.489
rym4 x
rym11
17 of 107
DHs
Chi2 =0.086
rym9 x
rym11
42 of 294
DHs
Chi2 =0.033
rym5 x
rym11
21 of 187
DHs
Chi2 =1.642
rym5 x
rym9
31 of 187
DHs
Chi2 =0.629
4r 11 9r 11r
9r
11 4r
4r
4r 11r
9
9
4/5 9r
9r
11r
11r
11r
11r 4/5
5r
5r
9
9
5r
5r
9r
9r
11
11
1
9
9
7
1
9
9
8
1
9
9
9
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
3
2
0
0
4
2
0
0
5
2
0
0
6
2
0
0
7
2
0
0
8
Year
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Infection days - autumn
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Attack - spring (%)
Infectiondays
Attack
Infectiondays =Number of days witha diurnal meantemperature >=10C between1st of
October and 31st of December
Relation between BYDV-attack of winter barley in spring and temperature in autumn
Luteovirus
BYDV-PAV
BYDV-MAV
Polerovirus
CYDV-RPV
Rhopalosiphum padi & Macrosiphum avenae
Macrosiphum avenae
Rhopalosiphum padi
+ssRNA-Virus,isometric particles
(25-30 nm), phloem limited
yield losses 20-40% Dr. A. Habekuss
Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)
Chromosome 2H
E34M49_290 8,5
AI1H450 7,1
E36M47_1 16,1
E35M50_3 7,6
E41M48_168 8,6
E39M49_3 10,2
E32M47_320 7,1
HvM023 9,8
HVBKASI 9,7
W11H620 20,9
E39M49_6 10,2
E39M51_9 5,6
V 12
E35M50_5 22,7
E43M50_4 27,7
AJ06H350* 34,6
HvM054 6
E43M50_1 4,1
W20H480 15,3
HVCSG 8,3
E36M47_11
L
cM
Chromosome 3H
AJ04H750
13,5
AJ14H690
11,1
E40M48_176
9,0
HVLTPPB
25,1
E35M49_7
25,1
X20H1750* 1,3
HvM009* 6,8
AG12H1200* 10,2
Bmac067* 2,6
YlpPCRM* 10,9
E45M50_7* 8,6
cMWG680* 11,3
I10H630* 15,5
HvM60*
S
L
cM
Ryd2 (Vixen)
QTL 2HL (Post)
part P 31.8%
part P 19.6%
58.9
58.2
56.6
56.0
54.6
54.1
60.5
61.5
63.7
64.7
65.5
52.9
Marker Recombinant inbred lines Map distances
(cM)
R
IL K
4-5
R
IL K
4-20
R
IL K
4-14
R
IL K
4-28
R
IL K
4-73
R
IL K
4-101
R
IL K
4-75
R
IL K
4-85
R
IL K
4-67
R
IL K
4-56
R
IL K
4-97
R
IL K
4-11
R
IL K
4-31
ABG458 ?*
E35M55-216
E40M32-209
E33M58-124
E33M61-441
E37M33-574
HVM22#
E45M55-262
E41M32-522
E42M48-303
E33M61-681
E40M38-112
E38M54-271
BYDscore
24 J une 2.7 2.3 2.7 2.0 2.3 2.0 1.3 2.3 2.3 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
17 J uly 3.0 3.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.3 1.7 1.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
susceptible resistant
58.9
58.2
56.6
56.0
54.6
54.1
60.5
61.5
63.7
64.7
65.5
52.9
(cM)
R
IL K
4-5
R
IL K
4-20
R
IL K
4-14
R
IL K
4-28
R
IL K
4-73
R
IL K
4-101
R
IL K
4-75
R
IL K
4-85
R
IL K
4-67
R
IL K
4-56
R
IL K
4-97
R
IL K
4-11
R
IL K
4-31
ABG458 ?*
E35M55-216
E40M32-209
E33M58-124
E33M61-441
E37M33-574
HVM22#
E45M55-262
E41M32-522
E42M48-303
E33M61-681
E40M38-112
E38M54-271
BYDscore
24 J une 2.7 2.3 2.7 2.0 2.3 2.0 1.3 2.3 2.3 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
17 J uly 3.0 3.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.3 1.7 1.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
58.9
58.2
56.6
56.0
54.6
54.1
60.5
61.5
63.7
64.7
65.5
52.9
(cM)
R
IL K
4-5
R
IL K
4-20
R
IL K
4-14
R
IL K
4-28
R
IL K
4-73
R
IL K
4-101
R
IL K
4-75
R
IL K
4-85
R
IL K
4-67
R
IL K
4-56
R
IL K
4-97
R
IL K
4-11
R
IL K
4-31
ABG458 ?*
E35M55-216
E40M32-209
E33M58-124
E33M61-441
E37M33-574
HVM22#
E45M55-262
E41M32-522
E42M48-303
E33M61-681
E40M38-112
E38M54-271
BYDscore
24 J une 2.7 2.3 2.7 2.0 2.3 2.0 1.3 2.3 2.3 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
17 J uly 3.0 3.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.3 1.7 1.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
R
IL K
4-5
R
IL K
4-20
R
IL K
4-14
R
IL K
4-28
R
IL K
4-73
R
IL K
4-101
R
IL K
4-75
R
IL K
4-85
R
IL K
4-67
R
IL K
4-56
R
IL K
4-97
R
IL K
4-11
R
IL K
4-31
ABG458 ?*
E35M55-216
E40M32-209
E33M58-124
E33M61-441
E37M33-574
HVM22#
E45M55-262
E41M32-522
E42M48-303
E33M61-681
E40M38-112
E38M54-271
BYDscore
24 J une 2.7 2.3 2.7 2.0 2.3 2.0 1.3 2.3 2.3 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
17 J uly 3.0 3.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.3 1.7 1.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6H
Identification von QTL for BYDV-tolerance
55 65 75 85 95 105
115
125
Yield/plant [%]
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
N
um
ber of lines
5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105
115
125
Yield/plant [%]
0
5
10
15
20
N
um
ber of lines
Yield/plant '97[%]
Yield/plant '98[%]
Yield/plant '99[%]
Fi el d tri al, Braunschwei g Pot experi ment, Raui schhol zhausen
Yield/plant '97[%]
Yield/plant '98[%]
Yield/plant '99[%]
Scheurer, K., W. Huth, R. Waugh, W. Friedt, F. Ordon, 2001. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:1074-1083
Ryd3, part P 75% (Vada x L94)
Niks, R.E., A. Habeku, B. Bekele, F. Ordon, 2004. Theor. Appl. Genet. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 1536-1543
Scheurer, K., W. Huth, R. Waugh, W. Friedt, F. Ordon, 2001. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:1074-1083
(ryd2, ryd3, QTL-) (Ryd2, Ryd3, QTL+)
winter barley, Quedlinburg, April 2008
QTL + (211 bp)
QTL - (218 bp)
QTL + (211 bp)
QTL - (218 bp)
Ryd3 (180 bp)
ryd3 (188 bp)
Ryd3 (180 bp)
ryd3 (188 bp)
r
y
d
2
(
2
5
3
b
p
)
R
y
d
2
(
3
1
1
b
p
)
r
y
d
2
(
2
5
3
b
p
)
R
y
d
2
(
3
1
1
b
p
)
QTL Post 2H
(HVCSG)
Ryd3
(HVM74)
Ryd2
(YLP +HSP92 II)
BYDV Pyramiding of QTL in winter barley and spring barley
RIL K4-56 (Ryd3) x DH21-136 (Ryd2 + QTL Post)
rrr rrs rsr srr ssr srs rss sss
No. DH-lines 89 49 45 99 49 77 38 29

Segregation Ryd2/ Ryd3/ Post-QTL
Riedel, C., A. Habekuss, E. Schliephake, R. Niks, I. Broer, F. Ordon, 2011 Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 69-76. Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance
Rym4/Rym5
OP-AF18H971
E45*M69
MWG838
MWG010
BMac029
rym4
P11M36
P21M68
P20M46
B368N12
OP-Z04
0.10
0.97
0.82
0.34
0.05
A
MWG838+
E37*M36
E37*M63
E35*M81
E39*M39
STSE31*M41+
MWG010+
BMac029*
OP-AF18H971+
E45*M69
rym5
E62*M67
0.88
0.34
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.10
B
Y57C10+
0.66
0.034
High resolution mapping
100 kb
Co-segregation proximal
BAC-contig
figure taken from:
Buchanan, Gruissem, Jones (2000)
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of plants
Isolation of resistance genes - allele mining
rym5 rym4
Stein, N., D. Perovic, J . Kumlehn, B. Pellio, S. Stracke, S. Streng, F. Ordon, A. Graner, 2005. The Plant J ournal 42, 912-922
Pellio, B., S. Streng, E. Bauer, N. Stein, D. Perovic, A. Schiemann, W. Friedt, F. Ordon, A. Graner 2005. Appl. Genet. 110, 283-293.
Hofinger et al. 2011. Molecular Ecology 20, 3653-3668
Wicker et al. 2005. The Plant J ournal, 41, 184-194
Summary and future prospects
Molecular markers facilitate already today efficient selection
procedures to improve virus resistance in cereals
The availability of dense marker maps, high
throughput genotyping platforms, physical maps and
genome sequences of cereals itself and related
species will facilitate an enhanced isolation of
resistance genes in the future thereby leading to a
deeper understanding of virus resistance and the
transfer of marker based selection to the allele level.
HVMX!
OP-XX1
rymX
HVMX
OP-XX
3.8
2.5
8.2
8.3
4HL
rymX C_XXXXX1_A C_3PO
GBSXXXX-1
GBSXXXX-2
kXXXX-2
Marker cM
0,751
0,072
0,107
0,072
0,572
U32_XXXX
kXXXX-4
0,036
0,143
C_XXXXX2_B
C_XXXXX3_B
0,036
454_XXXX-1
Fernie, A.R., N. Schauer, 2008: Trends in Genetics 25, 39-
48
This together with new selection strategies, e.g.
genomic selection procedures, will lead to an
enhanced breeding of virus resistant cultivars.
Thanks
BaMMV/BaYMV
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Friedt
Dr. Andrea Schiemann
Dr. Bettina Pellio
Dr. Kay Werner
Dr. Antje Habeku
Dr. Ilona Krmer
Prof. Dr. Andreas Graner
Dr. Nils Stein
Dr. Dragan Perovic
SBCMV
Dr. Dragan Perovic
Dr. Pierre Devaux
Dr. Djabar Hariri
Dr. Jens Weyen
Dr. Kostya Kanyuka
Funding
DFG
GFP
EU
BMELV
BMBF
BYDV
Dr. Winfried Huth
Dr. Konstanze Scheurer
Dr. Antje Habeku
Dr. Rients Niks
Christine Riedel

Upov Sym Ge 11 5

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Upov Sym Ge 11 5

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

www.jki.bund.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen