Nopane Ad Dollars: Number of dollars per 100 prospects spent on
Nopane advertising
Competition: No. of dollars per 100 prospects spent by competitors
advertising
Dum Copy: 1 if emotional copy is used
Dum Segm: 1 if sales territory is in Segment A
Assuming Alison Silks hypothesis is correct, which of the
regressions is most relevant for choosing an advertising strategy ? Silks Hypothesis: Nopanes competitor will react to our national strategy (whatever it might be) in the same way as they did in the test Regression 1 requires knowledge of Competitors spending We dont know this with Certainty so use Regression 3
Why cant we use Regression 2 to predict what the
competition will spend ? There are several issues One is that the adjusted R-squared for regression 2 is only about 50.68% This means that regression 2 does not account for 50% of the variability in the competition advertising spending So statistically speaking we could wind up a value that is highly unreliable Furthermore there are issues that arise when trying to use the same dataset to both estimate regression coefficients and predict independent variables