PICO Paper: Glycemic Control and Its Effect on Patient Outcomes
Aaron Phillips Ferris State University
GLYCEMIC CONTROL & PATIENT OUTCOMES
Abstract This paper explores the question; in hospitalized adults, how does tight glycemic control compare to uncontrolled glycaemia, affect inpatient outcomes? I have conducted research by reviewing numerous amounts of data to determine the effects hyperglycemia has on inpatient outcomes. I have explored the research data and made recommendations to improve the quality and safety of patients. In this paper the author has come to the conclusion that much more information is needed on diabetes and hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia events lead to poor patient outcomes. Increased staff development, education, and research are needed to combat the diabetic disease.
GLYCEMIC CONTROL & PATIENT OUTCOMES
Glycemic Control and Its Effect on Patient Outcomes It is no secret that diabetic patients have increased health risks compared to non-diabetic patients. With health care reform looming all around us, Washington DC and our health care system are looking for answers. Diabetic mellitus costs our health care system roughly 40 billion dollars a year and is one of the most expensive chronic diseases in the United State (Talley, Hill, Steadman, and Hess, 2012). According to Johnston and Van Horn (2011), diabetes mellitus (DM) affects 25.8 million people or 8.3% of the population of the United States, with type 2 DM composing of 90%-95% of diagnosis. Because of the absorbent costs of health care more resources and initiatives are being made to develop new policies and protocols than ever before. One of those initiatives is the change in the treatment of inpatient hyperglycemia (Talley et al., 2012).
Do hospitalized diabetic patients have worse outcomes than their non-diabetic
counterparts?
What affects does hyperglycemia have on inpatient outcomes? This is the
groundwork for my research paper.
PICO Question In hospitalized adults, how does tight glycemic control compare to uncontrolled glycaemia, affect inpatient outcomes? Measuring diabetes and its outcomes can be a difficult process. Diabetes is often not the primary reason for hospital admission and is often secondary (Talley et al., 2012). Hospitalization can cause extra stress on the body leading to increase hyperglycemic events (Johnson et al., 2011). Diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients, have worse outcomes such as higher mortality, increased wound infection, stroke, respiratory problems, and renal dysfunction. Moreover, longer intensive care unit and hospital stays, poorer post-operative physical functioning (Ji, Mei, Wang, Feng, Cai, Sun, and Chi, 2010).
GLYCEMIC CONTROL & PATIENT OUTCOMES
All this evidence leads us to believe that controlling hyperglycemia in diabetic patients is a very important aspect of patient care. Nurses play a big role in caring for diabetic patients. Monitoring blood sugars, disease education, nutrition education, and medication administration are just a few things that nurses do routinely in the care of diabetic patients. According to the ADA (2012) hypoglycemia is defined as any blood sugar greater than 140 mg/dL. No matter what type of hyperglycemia seen in the inpatient setting, any patient that exhibits hyperglycemia should receive treatment to prevent hyperglycemic complications (Talley et al., 2012). It is vital that nurses use professional communication to share hyperglycemic activity with their health care team in the inpatient setting. Delayed communication of hyperglycemic events can lead to increased medical complications and worse patient outcomes (Johnson et al., 2011). Research Findings There have been many changes in the treatment of hyperglycemia in inpatient care. Tight glycemic control has been defined by Talley et al. (2012) as blood glucose levels between 80 to 110 mg/dL, in surgical intensive care units and in critical inpatient settings. According to Talleys et al. (2012) study, Changes in the treatment of inpatient hyperglycemia: What every nurse practitioner should know about the 2012 Standards of Care, mortality increases for every 20 mg/dL over 100 mg/dL. This study reviewed many studies where glycemic control outcomes were evaluated which revealed interesting results. Talley et al., (2012) states in a single-blind study with an intensive control group (80-110 mg/dL) showed greater cases of hypoglycemia compared to conventional therapy (140-180 mg/dL). Moreover Talley et al states that there were no significant differences in mortality or length of stay in the Glucontrol Trial (2012).
GLYCEMIC CONTROL & PATIENT OUTCOMES
Even though the Glucotrol Study states that there is no increase of length of stay, hyperglycemia does increase wound infection (Talley et al., 2012). The hyperglycemic state unfortunately alters leukocyte functions by impairing phagocytosis and hinders that ability to kill bacteria (Talley et al., 2012). In Qiangs et al. (2010) study, Impact of diabetic mellitus on patients over 70 years of age undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, indicates that there is a much greater risk of infection and hyperglycemia. This study used a quantitative research method that used a systematic review of data to analyze infection rates of post-operative patients. Qiangs et al. study sampled 1090 patient over 5 years at a single hospital. Measurements were done via chart review of glycemic control using blood sugar machines, lab values, infection rate statistic, and many other values. The study showed that glycemic control is important in reductions of post-operative infection (Qiang et al., 2012). In Johnstons et al. study they studied the effects of corrective insulin and basal insulin on inpatient glycemic control (2011). This study tracked 45 patients blood sugar levels over three days. The data showed a correlation between the relevance of hyperglycemia and the complications associated with hyperglycemia (Johnston et al., 2011). An important note to this study is that the results showed that over half of all the capillary blood glucoses were hyperglycemic (Johnston et al., 2011). A limitation of this study is of course the sample size. Recommendations to Improve Quality and Safety Tracking diabetic complications can be a difficult process. The one thing that studies do show is that hyperglycemia does contribute on increased infection and other medical complications (Qiang et al., 2012). Many studies also conclude nurses and physicians are hesitant in administering insulin to maintain tight glycemic control in the fear of hypoglycemic events (Johnston et al., 2011). Glycemic control is a hot topic in hospital all around the country.
GLYCEMIC CONTROL & PATIENT OUTCOMES
More studies need to conduct short-term effects and long term effects of hyperglycemia in the hospital setting. There are so many limitations in the studies that the author has found. According to Talley et al, (2012) studies related to diabetes are difficult because of many variables associated with diabetes. There are many implications for nursing to improve the quality and safety of our diabetic patients. Nurses must communicate affectively and in a timely manner with physicians to obtain insulin orders. The author has observed first hand that nurses are hesitant to report hyperglycemic event patterns and failed to contact the physician in a timely manner. According to Johnston et al., (2011) nurses and nurse educators could improve glycemic control in hospitals with education on carb counting. Many nurses and doctors do not feel confident in carb counting and dosing prandial insulin (Johnston et al., 2011). Continued staff development and education is needed so that timely and appropriate nursing decisions can be made by staff when caring for diabetic patients. Conclusion Diabetes is a chronic problem that is not going to go away. Todays population continues to become more obese and diabetes is growing at an alarming rate (ADA, 2012). There is no single answer that is going to solve this problem. It is apparent that more research is needed and that nursing is going to have to play a major role in this research if we are ever going to gain ground on controlling diabetes and the poor outcomes related to hyperglycemia. Studies show that hyperglycemia has negative effects on patient outcomes (Talley et al., 2012). Diabetes has many variables and only more measured data, improved collaboration, communication, and improved technology is going to help fight this disease.
GLYCEMIC CONTROL & PATIENT OUTCOMES
References American Diabetic Association. (2012). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 35(1), S11-S61. Ji, Q., Mei, Y., Wang, X., Feng, J., Cai, J., Sun, Y., & Chi, L. (2010). Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients over 70 years of age undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart & Lung, 39(5), 404-409. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.10.003 Johnston, J. A., & R. Van Horn. (2011). The Effects of Correction Insulin and Basal Insulin on Inpatient Glycemic Control. MEDSURG Nursing, 20(4), 187-193. Talley, M. H., Hill, A., Steadman, L., & Hess, M. (2012). Changes in the treatment of inpatient hyperglycemia: What every nurse practitioner should know about the 2012 Standards of Care. Journal of The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 24(12), 683-689. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00770.x
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Experience of Working in An Interdisciplinary Team in Healthcare at The MOI Teaching and Referral Hospital, Intensive Care Unit
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology