Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Kelsey Kinard
TWS 7: Instructional Decision Making
journal entry or add to her illustrations. Student A responds better to praise than constructive
comments, but she would go back and quickly make correction when needed.
Average Student
Student B did well on the post-assessment journal entries. Her work is fairly neat and
she enjoys art so her illustrations were very good. Student B is on level as a first grader reader,
but she does not apply herself when it comes to writing. She lacks confidence and frequently
asks questions to make sure she is right. This showed in her assessments, but it did not affect
her scoring. When walking around the classroom monitoring, I would stop at her desk often to
provide reassurance even though she was always on task. Her strength is assignments on
paper. She was involved in the class discussions, but she could not formulate conclusions or
new ideas without heavy prompting. During whole group discussions and instruction, I would
ask her direct questions which she is better at answering.
Low Student
Student C did fair on the assessments used in the unit. He has a difficult time working
individually and staying on task. He is very inattentive and shows little self-motivation. While
working on the journal entries, I would have to stand over him constantly prompting to keep
him on task and focused on what he was doing. Otherwise, he would sit there or walk around
the room and not write anything on his paper. Student C required constant redirection, but he
did understand most of the material. He rarely could stay on task long enough to realize that
he was not finished with the assessment or pay attention long enough to go back and correct
his work even when clear and exact directions were given. When Student C did manage to
complete his journal entry in a timely manner or stay seated and on task during the lesson, I
made a point to praise his hard work.
Reflection on Teaching Style
I monitored and adjusted my teaching throughout the unit. The three types of
communities are a concept that my students were not at all familiar with. Because of the
subject matter and the allotted teaching time, I had to find ways to keep my students engaged
and interested throughout content-based lessons. I used a variety of strategies and tools
during instruction to keep the students engaged such as researching communities on Google
Images, watching video clips about communities, tying in the students personal experience,
creating bubble maps, whole group discussions, using turn and talk points for the students to
exchange ideas with their peers, and creating Are, Can, Have charts. I adjusted my
expectations halfway through teaching the unit. Teaching the first two lessons of the unit on
rural communities and urban communities went well and it appeared as though the students
were understanding and retaining the information. On the third day when I introduced
suburban as the third type of community, the discussions and journal entry assessments were
terrible. The students begin confusing the names and characteristics of all three types of
communities. At the beginning of the unit, I expected to quickly cover the types of
communities and then go further into the lifestyles and jobs associated with each community. I
had to adjust my expectation for the unit and instead focused on the students being able to
differentiate between the three types of communities.