Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
School
Grade / Class
Class Description
(# of students, demographics,
special populations)
Project Title
Science of Violence
Notes on write-up:
Sections 1-3 can be bulleted for ease of reading.
Bold important parts or key words.
When applicable, refer to SDAIE strategies (i.e. from Reiss)
Support your responses and choices of strategies with language acquisition theories whenever
possible (i.e. Krashen, Cummins, Bloom, etc.)
1. How might you build background knowledge or spark interest before beginning this project?
Think-Write-Pair-Share: pose an open-ended question (i.e. Projects Essential Question) and give
students time to think about their answer then write it down. Also, use a GRAPHIC ORGANIZER
on which students can record their thoughts. After students have spent time writing, allow them
to pair up and discuss what they had recorded. This will also allow students to cultivate more
ideas from their peers before sharing out to the whole class.
Make KWL charts: students would create KWL charts to demonstrate what they know about the
human nervous system, what they would like to know about the nervous system, and then apply
what they have LEARNED to the final project.
Link lessons: students are linking previous knowledge gained from the XONR8 project to both
SPARK INTEREST and CREATE CURIOSITY about the essential question.
Personalize the lesson: by allowing students to choose their own topics for this project, it serves
two functions; a) gains buy in to the project and b) allows students to draw from their banks of
prior knowledge to begin brainstorming what kind of information to search for. Students are
required to find their own articles as evidence to support their theses and will need to draw from
their own knowledge in order to search for appropriate material.
Preview the material: i.e. Next week, we will be discussing this topic in class. Use resources to
gain background information on any subject prior to class.
Combine strategies: for example, Think-Write-Pair-Share and K-W-L charts
2. What about this project is good for an ELL? Which requirements will be the least difficult? Why
do you think so?
This project is good for an ELL student because of the personalization aspect of the project. By
investing interest into a topic, students will be more open to learning about the new terms.
Students may choose their method of research, whether it be by visiting the library and using
hardcopy texts, using solely online resources, or going out into the community and interviewing
people. There is also an opportunity for personalization within the deliverable itself, as there are
many options to choose from aside from a written paper. Online resources are also suggested by
Reiss for vocabulary growth, which is also useful for students who are EL Learners and
attempting to access scholarly text on their topics.
Multiple access points: students have the ability to approach their topic from whatever angle
they feel most comfortable. If they choose to access mostly visuals and deliver a visual product,
students may do so. Also, the essential question is broad enough so that students may access
information as it interests them. For example, if a student decided that he wanted to explore the
correlation between football players multiple concussions, CTE, and a history of domestic
violence and suicide, he may do so. On the other hand, if a student decided that she wanted to
compare males and females and the tendency towards violence, she could also do so. Both
avenues of research access the essential question of whether or not crime, and more specifically,
violent crime, has biological roots.
Clear directions: Because the project is so broad, the directions are pretty clear: research a topic
that relates to the essential question regarding violent crime and whether or not it has biological
roots. (Chapter 10, Reiss)
Assign different means of completing the assignment (Chapter 10, Reiss)
Personal dictionaries (Chapter 8, Reiss)
Read text in small segments and highlight main ideas.
3. Which components of this project will be the most difficult for an ELL? How might you scaffold or
adjust those components?
Reading scholarly articles: we can scaffold this for ELLs by giving them tools to find articles in or
translate text to their native language. We can also encourage students to read articles in
sections and summarize bit by bit.
Writing components: scaffold by using graphic organizers and peer tutoring & editing.
3. How did completing the prototype/sample inform your scaffolding decisions?
As an Inclusion Specialist, I was not able to complete a prototype or a sample. My role was to
simply support the General Education teacher and provide accommodations when needed.
5. What feedback did you receive from your case study (ELL) student about this project? How did this
feedback inform your scaffolding decisions?
My case study is not in this teaching team, but the General Ed teacher and I were mindful about
allowing ELL students access to this project. By using the above accommodations and building
them into the project, we supplied proactive measures for assisting students who are EL
Learners and/or have IEPs and 504s. Things that have worked for my case study, however, were
things like providing note taking services, strategic pairing, and allowing the students to ask
clarifying questions or clarification of directions. Some of these same accommodations were
available during this project, with the exception of strategic pairing (because this was an
individual project) and note taking services. Students were also given access to peer editing and
one-on-one teacher consultation time, where they could ask the teacher for clarification and
have special time to get advice on refinement.