Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CONTENTS
Introduction
Current Scenario
Hall Effect Sensor
Traditional system
Proposed system
Algorithm
Comparison
Experiments
Conclusion
References
INTRODUCTION
Importance of EV
Brushless PM motor
Controlling of motor
CURRENT SCENARIO
Optical encoder method
TRADITIONAL SYSTEM
3 hall effect sensors
Contd
Hall A
Contd
= +
60--------------------------------------(1)
= +N - ---- (2)
PROPOSED SYSTEM
Capture function highly
= N ------------------(4)
sensitive to noise
calculated without capture = + 60 -----------(5)
interrupt
Contd
6 step input
Effect of
A. = 60
B. = 180
C. = 300
EEE DEPT, MACE, KTLM
10
Algorithm
A
Detect hall
state change
Yes
Perform estimation
Timer
Counts a
period
Yes
AP+1
A
Set AP=0
No
Perform discriminations
Perform AD conversion
EEE DEPT, MACE, KTLM
11
Estimation Errors
Traditional calculate using
precise data (, & )
Proposed system faster
calculation by periodic checking
at hall state change instant
12
COMPARISON
Traditional system
Proposed system
Interrupt functions
No. of variables
AP,t, and
Only AP
Processor
TMS32F2812 DSP
TMS32F2812 DSP
Speed
slower
Storage space
More
Less
Estimation errors
Less
More
EEE DEPT, MACE, KTLM
13
EXPERIMENT - 1
Verification on 50W SPM motor
TMS32F2812 DSP
Clock speed 150MHz
14
EXPERIMENT - 1
15
EXPERIMENTAL - 2
Verification on 50kW IPM motor
16
EXPERIMENTAL - 2
17
CONCLUSION
An improved angular displacement measurement using hall
effect sensors for driving brushless PM motors proposed.
Uses periodic interrupt method only.
Applicable to brushless PM motors with any type of back
EMF wave form.
It simplifies the estimation process, there by operation speed
2.9 times faster than traditional method.
EEE DEPT, MACE, KTLM
18
REFERENCES
1) G. Pellegrino, A. Vagati, P. Guglielmi, and B. Boazzo, Performancecomparison
between surface mounted
and interior PM motor drives forelectric vehicle
application, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 2,pp. 803811, Feb. 2012.
2) M. Tursini, A. Scafati, A. Guerriero, and R. Petrella, Extended torquespeed
region sensorless control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motors, in
Proc. Int. Aegean Conf. Elect. Mach. Power Electron., Bodrum, Turkey, 2007, pp.
647652.
3) S. Bolognani, S. Calligaro, R. Petrella, andM. Tursini, Sensorless control of IPM
motors in the low-speed range and at stand-still by HF-injection and DFT
processing, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 96104, Jan./Feb. 2011.
4) A. Accetta, M. Cirrincione, M. Pucci, and G. Vitale, Sensorless control of PMSM
fractional horsepower drives by signal injection and neural adaptive-band filtering,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 13551366, Mar. 2012.
EEE DEPT, MACE, KTLM
19
THANK YOU
EEE DEPT, MACE, KTLM
20
QUERIES?
EEE DEPT, MACE, KTLM
21