Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(FRQRPLVW
6HDQ7XUQHOO
SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia Vol. 29, No. 3 (2014), pp. 691720
DOI: 10.1355/sj29-3f
2014 ISEAS
ISSN 0217-9520 print / ISSN 1793-2858 electronic
06 SOJOURN.indd 691
10/31/14 3:43 PM
692
Sean Turnell
06 SOJOURN.indd 692
10/31/14 3:43 PM
693
Hla Myint was born in 1920, in Bassein (now Pathein), the port
city and capital of Myanmars Ayeyarwady region, and long a hub
for rice milling and export. Hla Myints father died young, and his
mother thereafter ran a small shop in order to ensure that the family
survived.3 Possessing a certain degree of business acumen, she was
later to expand the shop, and eventually moved to Rangoon. She
was later remarried, to a government official of modest rank named
U Hla Tin. The latter was the younger brother of U Tun Shein,
a prominent politician from Mandalay who, with U Pu and U Ba
Pe, had been part of a delegation from the Young Mens Buddhist
Association that visited London in 1919 to call for constitutional
reform in Burma (Taylor 2008, p. 163). U Tun Shein had died the
year Hla Myint was born, however, minimizing the leverage of the
only real connections that the family enjoyed.
Notwithstanding his relatively humble beginnings, Hla Myints
promise did not take long to be noticed. Accelerated through his
schooling, Hla Myint was encouraged by the headmaster of the
school that he attended to apply to the University of Rangoon to
study economics while still just fourteen years old. Waiving the
customary minimum age for new undergraduates of fifteen, the
university admitted Hla Myint to its economics programme in 1934.
At the University of Rangoon, Hla Myint came under the influence
of Harro Bernadelli, an Austrian economist of Italian extraction who
had been a student of Joseph Schumpeter in Vienna (Donoghue 2007,
pp. 2527).4 Bernadelli was amongst that cohort of scholars forced
to flee the Nazis in the early 1930s. He initially found refuge at the
London School of Economics (LSE), where he worked alongside
such luminaries as Lionel Robbins, John Hicks and significantly
for Hla Myint later Friederich Hayek. Robbins, who was central
to the programme of rescue and sanctuary of academic refugees from
the Third Reich, recorded at the time that Bernadelli was by far
the most distinguished of the younger men who have come under
our observation (quoted in Howson 2011, p. 243). In the late 1930s
06 SOJOURN.indd 693
10/31/14 3:43 PM
694
Sean Turnell
06 SOJOURN.indd 694
10/31/14 3:43 PM
695
06 SOJOURN.indd 695
10/31/14 3:43 PM
696
Sean Turnell
06 SOJOURN.indd 696
10/31/14 3:43 PM
697
with this vision was the team of economic advisers from Robert
Nathan and Associates, the firm employed by the Burmese government
to engage in long-term economic planning for the country.13 Hla
Myint got along well personally with these American advisors, and
especially with Nathans chief economist on the ground, Louis
Walinsky, but was sceptical of the giant engineering report that
they drew up to propel Myanmars industrialization, the Economic
and Engineering Development of Burma, Comprehensive Report,
1953. Containing too much American organisation and requiring
an administrative framework that Burma neither possessed nor could
support, he regarded the reports proposals as doomed to failure.14
In this view, as in much else from the period immediately following
Burmas independence, Hla Myint would be proved prescient.
During his time as economic advisor to U Nu, Hla Myint was
especially troubled by the State Agricultural Marketing Board
(SAMB), a body set up to serve as Burmas monopoly rice exporter
and one whose profits from paying farmers a price for their crop
below the world market price were the primary funding vehicle for
state-led industrialization and other schemes (Turnell 2009, pp. 191
92). Matters came to a head in 1950, when Hla Myint approached
Prime Minister U Nu to explain that Burmas rice export industry
was being strangled to death both by the government policy and
by the dead weight loss from the sheer inefficiency and corruption
of the SAMB.15 Hla Myint told U Nu that the only way to save
Myanmars rice export sector was to abandon the SAMB, and allow
both private and foreign investment to re-enter the industry. This
advice was totally unacceptable to U Nu, whom it struck as a return
to the much hated Colonial system of Laissez faire. Soon after
this encounter, Hla Myint decided to return to the United Kingdom,
dejected and confirmed to my belief that I had no future as an
economic adviser in [Burma]. Reflecting on the episode many years
later, Hla Myint believed that it was possible to trace the misguided
economic policies that followed from this point to the reaction against
a caricature of colonial economic policies that held firm in the minds
of that first generation of his countrys post-independence leaders.
06 SOJOURN.indd 697
10/31/14 3:43 PM
698
Sean Turnell
Hla Myints return to the United Kingdom saw him take up a position
in 1950 as lecturer in colonial economics at the University of
Oxford.17 Even at the time, it was an anachronistic job title. But
Hla Myint would soon turn the curriculum of his teaching and
research into what would become development economics, and the
name of his position to lecturer in underdeveloped countries. The
sub-discipline of development economics did not then exist, and to
the extent that consideration was given to questions of growth and
development, much of the existing literature was fixated on China
and India, countries suffering from acute population pressure and
material poverty, but countries that Hla Myint regarded as not at all
representative of the situation elsewhere. Hla Myint also found that
much of the approach of universities to the teaching of development
was either geared towards the training of colonial officials, intended
to make a case for increasing international aid (Hla Myint 1973,
p. 17), or both. Accordingly, Hla Myint turned to the classical writers
on economics. As he would remark to the author in 2012, I looked
for alternatives and found them in Adam Smith.18
Rector of the University of Rangoon
In 1958, Hla Myint returned to Myanmar for one final time to serve
as rector of the University of Rangoon, out of a residual sense of
obligation to his home country.19 He was confident that he might be
able to do good reasoning that, if he lacked the political abilities
to be an economic advisor, then at least education was something on
which his own priorities and that of the Myanmar government should
be in accord. Alas, his time as rector was to be no happier than his
earlier stint as an advisor. In 1958 the University of Rangoon was
06 SOJOURN.indd 698
10/31/14 3:43 PM
699
06 SOJOURN.indd 699
10/31/14 3:43 PM
700
Sean Turnell
During his tenure at Oxford and at the LSE, Hla Myint was to
make an array of lasting contributions to economics. Many of these
centred around the question of how openness to trade and exchange
contributed to economic development. Hla Myint worked very
much within the classical tradition in asking the big questions
of what brought about the wealth and prosperity of nations. In his
first book in 1948, which as noted above was an extension
of his doctoral thesis, he addressed his conception of these larger
questions, and the classical approach to them, in this way:
06 SOJOURN.indd 700
10/31/14 3:43 PM
701
06 SOJOURN.indd 701
10/31/14 3:43 PM
Sean Turnell
702
The nexus between trade and economic development was the dominant
theme throughout Hla Myints writings. Over time, however, it went
well beyond vent-for-surplus notions of the bringing into production
of erstwhile surplus resources, and deeper into ways in which
institutional change could be stimulated. The role that institutions
play in economic development is now mainstream. Indeed, the idea
is behind the awarding of more than one Nobel Prize in economics.
But Hla Myints emphasis on it was pioneering at the time that
he advanced it.23 Here he is, for instance, writing in 1973, with a
sceptical eye on the then fashionable Rostovian staged take off
model of development (Rostow 1960).
although there is much discussion about providing the
underdeveloped countries with the material infrastructure such
as transport systems and power stations, there has been little
discussion of the problems of providing them with the social and
institutional infrastructure as necessary preconditions for the
take-off. On the contrary, much of the discussion proceeds on
the implicit assumption that all the underdeveloped countries are
ready for the take-off, as though a sufficiently long runway had
already been built and that what is needed is a final spurt of speed
on it. (Hla Myint 1973, p. 14, emphasis added)
06 SOJOURN.indd 702
10/31/14 3:43 PM
703
Hla Myint dug deeper into the processes of institutional change (he
mostly used the expression organisational framework) throughout
his work across the 1960s and into the 1990s. Summarizing it all in
1996 in a book that he co-authored with Deepak Lal, but in which
the passage quoted below was his own, he outlined the ways in
which (once again), a developing country could use the opening
of its agricultural sector to restructure its economy by transforming
its institutional arrangements. As a first step this process would
involve vent-for-surplus gains by bringing small farmers into the
light of international exchange, and yielding scale economies and
improvements in infrastructure, both physical and otherwise.
the expansion of peasant exports, leading to the development
of the market system by drawing the peasant households into
the exchange economy, would be a powerful factor in reducing
the marketing and organizational costs of the traditional sector.
This would pave the way for further economic growth through
a greater degree of specialization and division of labour by
widening the size of the local market through improvements in
transport and communications and joining them together into
a more articulated market system extending over the whole
economy. (Hla Myint and Lal 1996, p. 194)
06 SOJOURN.indd 703
10/31/14 3:43 PM
Sean Turnell
704
06 SOJOURN.indd 704
10/31/14 3:43 PM
705
06 SOJOURN.indd 705
10/31/14 3:43 PM
Sean Turnell
706
06 SOJOURN.indd 706
10/31/14 3:43 PM
707
06 SOJOURN.indd 707
10/31/14 3:43 PM
708
Sean Turnell
06 SOJOURN.indd 708
10/31/14 3:43 PM
709
06 SOJOURN.indd 709
10/31/14 3:43 PM
710
Sean Turnell
06 SOJOURN.indd 710
10/31/14 3:43 PM
711
and transaction costs would not only increase the price which the
up-country farmers would receive for their paddy, but would also
have favourable effects on the country at large (Hla Myint 2013).
Finally, in his letter Hla Myint worried that such a policy as the
FPB could unwittingly undermine the newly available comparative
advantage that the country had in labour-intensive manufacturing
that is, its low-cost base, centring upon lower labour costs than its
peers in Southeast Asia. Such an advantage was especially critical
in this new age of manufacturing, in which trade did not just
take place amidst finished products, but as inputs into vast supply
chains of intermediate goods, the production of each of which was
predicated operating in the lowest-cost location (Hla Myint 2013).
Again, in a later private memorandum written to support the letters
contentions, he outlined the compelling logic of what was possible.
In the post-war period, the rise of the Asian Tiger economies
such as Taiwan and South Korea had demonstrated how poor lowwage countries could launch themselves into rapid and sustained
economic growth by expanding labour-intensive exports of
manufactures. By the 1970s these countries had become labourscarce countries, and with rising wages at home, they sought to
relocate the more labour-intensive type of manufacturing in the
Southeast Asia countries with lower wages, such as Thailand
and Malaysia with stable economic conditions which welcomed
foreign direct investment. Thus Thailand and Malaysia were able
to diversify their exports, producing both primary products and
manufactured products, starting with the simpler manufactures,
gradually moving up to the export of more complex goods.31
06 SOJOURN.indd 711
10/31/14 3:43 PM
712
Sean Turnell
Hla Myints letter on the FPB marked his most public intervention
in the arena of policy advocacy in Myanmar since the establishment
of the Thein Sein government. As noted above, however, Hla Myint
has also been active in providing advice to policymakers and advisors
in Myanmar via a series of private memoranda and other forms of
correspondence. His advice has ranged across many areas, but it
has all been in line with his time-honoured and consistent counsel
in favour of greater openness and economic freedom. Encouraging
foreign direct investment (FDI) has been a focus, but on this score
Hla Myint has sought to emphasize that what the country needs is
FDI with the maximum spread effects. He defined such effects as
broadly to include the Keynesian multiplier effect, the development
of the linkages between the up-stream-downstream stages in
the chain of manufacturing, and the indirect educative effect of
contact with the outside world economy.33 FDI in labour-intensive
manufacturing, tourism and agriculture had the greatest spread effects.
FDI that brought with it minimal spread effects was especially
concentrated in such extractive sectors as energy, mining and logging,
despite the fact that they were Myanmars largest foreign-exchange
earners. Despite that distinction only a virtue if the resultant
revenues were used in socially productive ways the extractive
industries brought with them not insignificant problems. Based on
the exploitation of exhaustible natural resources, they were often
environmentally damaging and dangerous to work in. Further, in
Hla Myints analysis, they had a limited spread effect on the rest
of the economy.34
Institutional Framework and Time
06 SOJOURN.indd 712
10/31/14 3:43 PM
713
06 SOJOURN.indd 713
10/31/14 3:43 PM
Sean Turnell
714
A Coda
06 SOJOURN.indd 714
10/31/14 3:43 PM
715
an outcome that, not least, the embrace of the ideas of its greatest
economist will hasten.
Sean Turnell is Associate Professor in the Department of Economics, Building
E4, Macquarie University, Eastern Road, North Ryde NSW 2109, Australia; email:
sean.turnell@mq.edu.au.
NOTES
06 SOJOURN.indd 715
10/31/14 3:43 PM
716
Sean Turnell
06 SOJOURN.indd 716
10/31/14 3:43 PM
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
717
the result that in the view of this author his contributions to the
field have been given insufficient attention from economists. The Nobel
Prizes alluded to here are those awarded to North himself, in 1993, and
perhaps even to Stiglitz, in 2001.
For more on each of these episodes of state planning, see Tin Maung
Maung Than (2006), Myat Thein (2004), and Turnell (2009, pp. 18285,
19192, 21619).
For more on the responses in different countries to the legacy of colonial
economic policies and Hla Myints analyses of those responses, see Hla
Myint (1967).
Ronald Findlay would go on to fame as a member of the Department
of Economics at Columbia University and figures with Hla Myint as
Myanmars other economist of truly international renown. Mya Maung
(Boston College), Khin Maung Kyi (National University of Singapore)
and Myo Nyunt (Edith Cowan University, Western Australia) would all
be forced to leave Burma to pursue their academic careers. U Thet Tun
would head the countrys statistical service, before joining its diplomatic
corps. U Aye Hlaing soldiered on at the University of Rangoon, where he
produced a series of important works on Myanmars economy (notably Aye
Hlain 1964). U Myint would go on to work in various UN agencies, and
would be one of the leading players in the economic reforms enacted by
the Thein Sein government starting in 2011. A subset of these economists
are celebrated in Brown (2013), which places insufficient stress on the
extent to which they disagreed with the policies of the governments that
they tried to serve.
The name given to that group of U.S.-trained Indonesian economists
which included Widjojo Nitisantro, Mohammad Sadli and Ali Wardhana
who edged Indonesian President Soeharto in the direction of market
reform (McCawley 2011).
One of the best analyses of Thai policy appears in Hla Myints published
letter to the New Light of Myanmar (Hla Myint 2013).
This memorandum, entitled Two Important Policies for the Economic
Development of Burma and dated 1 August 2013, was furnished to the
author by Hla Myint in personal correspondence, 1 August 2013.
Ibid.
Ibid.
For a taste of the public campaign, see Soong (2013).
Hla Myint, personal correspondence with the author, 2 July 2012. Hla
Myints work had long placed emphasis on these three effects, which are
best summarized in Hla Myint (2001).
Ibid.
Ibid.
06 SOJOURN.indd 717
10/31/14 3:43 PM
718
Sean Turnell
36. Hla Myint, personal correspondence with the author, 20 August 2012,
on which the discussion that follows also draws.
37. Hla Myint, personal correspondence with the author, 20 August 2012.
REFERENCES
06 SOJOURN.indd 718
10/31/14 3:43 PM
719
06 SOJOURN.indd 719
10/31/14 3:43 PM
720
Sean Turnell
06 SOJOURN.indd 720
10/31/14 3:43 PM