Principal Ipcr (Final)

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
(For Principals/School Heads)

Division of Digos City
Name of Employee
Position
Rating Period
School/District
:
:
:
:
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
Name of Rater
Position
Date of Review
: ___________________________________________
: ___________________________________________
: ___________________________________________
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
Delivery of
Basic
Instructional
1.
Leadership
supervisory plan on 3rd-4th week of
Education
-40%
Services
Prepare school year instructional
Accomplishments
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE
May
5%
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (Quality,

Efficiency, Timeliness)
MOVs
May within a rating period

Supervisory plan contains the
following areas:
a.
Plan was needs based
Supervisory Plan
a.) Class Observation
b.
Objectives were attainable
TLOC
b.) Checking of Forms
c.
Objectives were well-defined
Supervisory Tools
c.) Checking of LPs/ Different DepED
d.
Plan was developed with teachers
Checklist
progams
d.) Monitoring of different DepED
e.
Monitoring and evaluation scheme

was defined in the plan
programs
e.) Monitoring of School initiated
intervention
(5) All indicators were met without any
revision and submitted ahead of
- NAT review
schedule
-Reading Recovery/LIP
-ADM
f.) Conduct of Spot Test
(4) All indicators were met with minor

schedule
(3)All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted on schedule.
(2) All indicators were met with major
revisions and submitted behind
schedule
1
Spot Test Results

Action/
Inbtervention
Plans
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

MOVs
(1) Less than 4 indicators were met with

major revisions and submitted behind
schedule
2.) Observe at least 10 teachers in

a month observing the categories
June - Dec
7%
(5) Observed 130% and above of the

targetted number of teachers
below:
(4) All indicators were met without
year/ teacher
STAR Notes

schedule.
(3) Observed 100%- 114% of the targetted
numbers of teachers.
21-25 teachers observe 3 times a

year/ teacher
26- 49 teachers observe 2 time a
(2) Observed 51 - 99% of the targetted
year/teacher
number of teachers.
50 - above teachers observe once a
(1) Observed 50% -below of the targetted
year/teacher
numbers of teachers.
5%
forms of teachers with the following
(5) Inspected 130% and above of the

targetted percentage of DLL and
frequencies:
school forms.
3.1) DLL - weekly
(4) Inspected 115-129% of the targetted
3.2) School Forms - Monthly
percentage of DLL and school forms.
3.3) Form 137 & 138 - Quarterly
(3) Inspected 100%- 114% of the targetted
3.4) Other forms - as needed
(Note: Items 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 & 3.4 shall
(2) Inspected 51% -99% of the targetted
be rated individually. Sum of the

ratings for 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 & 3.4 shall
be divided by 4 to get the
average rating.)
Notes, CB-PAST
Form 3A
5-15 teachers observe 5 times a
3. Inspect 75 % of DLL and school
Observation
(1) Inspected 50% -below of the targetted

Checklist
STAR observation
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
2
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
4.)
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Improve pupils learning outcome

targetting the following:
JuneMarch
4.1) 2% increase in NAT VI and
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE
(8%)

(5) Achieved 130% and above of the
MOVs
NAT Results
targetted percentage in NAT.

2%
Year IV over that of the

previous year
(4) Achieved 115-129% of the targetted

perentage in NAT
(3) Achieved 100 - 114 % of the targetted
percentage in NAT.
percentage in NAT.
(1) Achieved 50% of the targetted
percentage in NAT.
(5) Attained 130% and above of the
targetted percentage of pupils/
students
(4) Attained 115-129% of the targetted
percentage of pupils/students.
(3) Attained 100 - 114% of the targetted
(2) Attained 51 - 99% targetted
percentage of the pupils/students.
(1) Attained 50% -below targetted
4.2) General Scholastic Average
JuneMarch
3%
(5) Achieved 130% and above of the
Periodic Test
targetted percentage of students/puipls

Results/MPS
Promotional Report
percentage of students/pupils.
(3) Achieved 100 - 114 % of the targetted
Grading Sheets
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
(1) Attained 50% -below targetted
3
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
4.3) Reading:
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE
3%
75% of Grade I and II pupils shall be
Phil-IRI Results
(4) Attained 115-129% of the targeted
75% of the year I to IV students shall be
instructional readers in English and

Filipino
75% of the year I to IV students shall

percentasge of students/pupils.
be instructional readers in both
percentage of students/pupils
(1) Attained 50% -below of the targetted
English and Filipino

Performance Indicators
MOVs
targetted percentage of students/pupils
instructional readers in Mother Tongue
5.

7%
5.1 2% increase on Enrolment rate

5.2. 2% decrease on Drop-out rate
(5) Attained 115 - 129% of the targetted BEIS

increase/deacrease for each of the
perfromance indicator.
5.3) 2% increase on Retention Rate
5.4) 2% increase on Survival rate
increase/deacrease for each of the

perfromance indicator.
increase/decrease for each of the
performance indicator.
(2)Attained 51 - 99 % of the targetted
4
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
6.
Participate 75% of academic and
non-academic competitions in the
Accomplishments
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE
June-
4%
April
district/cluster level/or division level for

Certificate of
targetted percentage of events per
Participation
competitions
Pictorials
compettions without any district/cluster
(4) Attained 113 - 129 % and above of the
level observing the following:

Small schools = 10 teachers and below =
targetted percentage of events per

competitions.
25 % of all the events per competition to
(3) Attained 100-114% of the targetted
participated in
MOVs
Memoranda
percentage of events per competition.
Big Schools = 31 teachers and up = 75%
of events per competition to be
participated in

5 - National Level
4- Regional Level
3- Division Level
2- Distrcit Level
1- School Level
(Note: Rating here shall be based on the
highest awards received regardless of
number of awards received.)
7. Obtain academic and co-
June-
curricular awards
April
4%
Awards received:
5- National Level
4- Regional Level
3- Division Level
Certificates
Pictorials
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
2- District Level
1- School Level
(Note: Rating here shall be based on the
highest awards received regardless of
number of awards received.)
5
TARGET
MFO
Accomplishments
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE
1. Manage the school plant, physical
May-
5%
Environment
fitness facilities, safety and sufficient
April
10%
with the assistance of specialists twice a year.
KRA/Weight
Learning
OBJECTIVES

MOVs
a. Prepared updated inventory of school
Inventory Reports
facilities for Beginning and End of
Records of school
b.
School Year
Identified/Prioritized facilities needed
by the school
c.
Acquired/ Purchased needed

facilities
d. Kept records of inventories of school
property
Liquidation Reports
ARE/ICS/
Stock Card
facilities
5- All indicators were met
4- 3 indicators were met
3- 2 indicators were met
2- 1 indicator was met
1- No indicator was met
2.
Implement 75% of the DepEd

programs and projects
MayApril
5%
(5 ) Implemented 130 and above of the
Accomplishment
identified DepEd programs and projects
Report/
Child Friendly Programs
supported with evidences such as school
Documentation/
GPP
policy reports, information materials,
Pictorial
Tree Planting
advocacy activities, regular meetings
Action Plans
- Brigada Eskwela (Adopt a School)

-
Feeding Program
WATCH
and inventory.
(4)Implemented 115 - 129% of the
identified DepED programs and projects
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
DRRM
supported with evidences such as policy
Solid waste and Management
reports, information materials, advocacy
ICT Program
activities, regular meetings and inventory
Peace Education
ALIVE/MADRASAH
IPEd
(3) Implemented 100 - 114% of the
6
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

ADM
Regular Program
activities, regular meetings and inventory.
Special Program (SSES)
MOVs
(2) Attained 50% -below of the
Health and Nutrition Program
Canteen
APPES
Campus Journalism

(1) Attained 50% -below of the
Human Resource
1. Assess training needs of 75% of
May-
3%
a. Conducted training needs assessment
IPPD/SPPD
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
Management and
teachers.
using NCBTS Tool
October
Development
NCBTS-TSNA
b. Analyzed the Training Needs Assessment
(20%)
Result
c. Prepared School Plan for Professional
Development (SPPD)
d. Implemented School Plan for Professional
Development (SPPD)
e. Utilized and compiled data
(5) All indicators were met with complete
documents
(4) 4 indicators were met with supporting
documents
documents
documents
7
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

MOVs
(1) 1 indicator was met with supporting

documents
2. Provide technical assistance and or
introduces innovations to 50% of the
identified teachers on matters pertaining
to enhancement of classroom management
to enhancement of classroom
management skills and instructional
competence using NCBTS, IPCR and
IPPD.
June March
3%
(5 ) Provided technical assistance/

innovations to 130 % and above of the
identified teachers with concerns on classroom management skills and instructional
IPPD/SPPD
TLOC
Conference Notes
competence using NCBTS, IPCR and IPPD.

(4 ) Provided technical assistance/
innovations to 115 - 129 % and above of the
identified teachers with concerns on

classroom management skills and instructional
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
competence using NCBTS, IPCR and IPPD.

(3) Provided technical assistance/
innovations to 100 -114 % and above of
the identified teachers with concerns on
classroom management skills
and instructional competence using
NCBTS, IPCR and IPPD.
(2) Provided technical assistance/
innovations to 51 - 99 % and above of
the identified teachers with concerns on
classroom management skills
and instructional competence using
(1) Provided technical assistance/innovations
to 50% and below of the identified teachers
with concerns on classroom management
skills and instructional competence using
8
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
3.) Prepare and implement equitable
teaching loads and anicillary
assignement
TIMELINE
MayJune
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE
2%

a. Assigned teachers according to
specialization/skills.
b. Assigned equitable teaching loads to
teachers.
c. Submitted class program before the start
of classes
d. Make summary of loads before the start
of classes
e. Submitted summary of loads before the
MOVs
Form 7
Memorandum for
designations
Class program
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
start of classes
(5) All indicators were met.
(4) 4 indicators were met.
(2) 2 indicator swere met.
(1) 1 indicator was met.
4.) Conduct/initiate at least 2 schoolbased training.
May-
3%
April
a. Followed design of training.
Training Design
b. Used appropriate training materials/
Attendance sheet
equipment/technology.
c. Included the service of experts in the
Narrative report
Pictorials
subject area.
d. Encouraged active trainers/group
participation.
e. Evaluated results of training.
f. Used the adult learning strategies
g. Acted as training facilitator/
9
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

MOVs

(1) 1 or 3 indicators were met.
5.) Assess teachers' performance twice
twice in a school year.
May
October
3%
a. Teacher was oriented on the process of

targetting/rating.
minutes of
meeting
b. Performance targets were discussed and
Attendance
agreed upon
c. periodic meeting, (semestral) was
conducted to monitor status of
sheet
Copy of
agreement
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
performance based on targets

d. Self-rating of ratee was discussed and
Conference
notes
appraised against targets and

accomplishments.
e. Agreement of rating was arrived at.
6.) Conduct 1 action research in a year.
MayApril
3%
Conducted a school action research and was

undertaken using the following steps:
a. Preparation of design
b. Conducting the research
c. Managing the data
Action Research
10
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

d. Analyzing the data.
e. Disseminating the data.
f. Utilizing the results
(5) All indicators were met and submitted
ahead of schedule.
on schedule
(3) 4-5 indicators were met and submitted
on schedule
(2) 2-3 indicators were met and submitted
behind the schedule.
(1) 1 indicator was met and submitted
behind schedule.
MOVs
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
7. Observe punctuality, attendance and
Jan.- Dec
3%
good grooming
* As reflected in DTRs/Form 7
(5) Not more than 4 days absent
DTR, Checklist
Form 7
(4) 5-8 days absent
Observation
(3) 9-12 days absent
journals,
7.1.2 in handling classes
(2) 13-16 days absent
attendance,
7.1.3 in attending activities called
(1) more than 16 days absent
hospitalization
7.1 Attendance
7.1.1 as reflected in the DTR
for (wellness programs, meeting, etc.)
bills/abstract
7.1.4 Flag Raising/Lowering
* Attendance to classes/activities called

for/Flag Raising/Flag Lowering, etc.
5 - Not more than 4 time absent
4 - 5-8 times absent
3- 9 -12 times absent
2-13-16 times absent
1- more than 16 times absent
11
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER

* Attendance to classes/activities called
for/Flag Raising/Flag Lowering, etc.
5 - Not more than 4 time absent
4 - 5-8 times absent
3- 9 -12 times absent
2-13-16 times absent
1- more than 16 times absent
(5) Not more than 3 times tardy/undertime
7.2. Punctuality
during the last 10 months/during meetings

-in coming to school
or other activities.
-in attending classes

-in attending activities
called for
(4) 4-6 times tardy/undertime during the

last 10 months/during meetings or other
- in preparing/submitting required
documents
activities.
MOVs
Accomplishments
Actual
Score
Rating
Results
(3) 7-10 times tardy/undertime during

the last 10 months/during meetings or
other activities.
(2)11-15 times tardy/undertime during the
last 10 months/during meeitngs or other
activities.
(1) more than 15 times tardy/undertime
during the last 10 months/during meetings
or other activities
7.3. Good Grooming

(5) Less than 4 times not in proper attire
(Comply with the prescribed uniform
uniform within the rating period
from Monday to Thurday as reflected
Observations,
Journals/STAR
(4) 4 -6 times not in proper uniform/attire
in DepED Order No. 7, s. 2013; and
within the rating period.
wearing of a decent/modest attire on

12
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

MOVs
(3) 7-10 times not in proper uniform/attire

Friday. If wearing a t-shirt, it should
within the rating period.
be with collar. Wearing of IDs is
(2) 11 - 15 times not in proper uniform/
indispensably included.)
attire within the rating period.

(1) more than 15 times not in proper
uniform/attire within the rating period.
Parents'
Involvement
1. Establish school and family

community partnership for school
and
performance.
MayApril
2%
a. Has stakeholders partnership/

mobilization plan
b. Implemented mobilization plan with
Action plan
Narrative Report
Pictorials
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
Community
reports and documentations.
Partnership
c. Organized programs with stakeholders
(5%)
Copies of school
policies
especially parents for academic and other
Formulated
purpose
Deed of donation
d. Formulated school policies.

e. Obtained resources for school through
stakeholders partnership.
(3) 3indicators were met.
2. Register 20% of the students for GSP/
June - Oct
1%
(5) 130% and above of the targetted
Registration form
percentage of pupils/students registered
BSP/RCYC
in BSP/GSP/RCYC/etc.
13
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

(4) 115 - 129% of the targetted percentage
of pupils/students registered in BSP/GSP/
RCYC/etc.
RCYC/etc.
MOVs
Actual
Results
Score
Rating

RCYC/etc.
(1) 50% or below of the targetted percentage
RCYC/etc.
3.ManagelinkagewithGOs/NGOs
to school activities.
May-
2%
April
ManagementoflinkagewithGOs/NGOs
Programs
to school activities was achieved when:
Pictorials,
a.TheinvolvementofGOs/NGOsto
Narrative
school activities was elicited
Report
b.CollaborativerelationwithGOs/
NGOs was sustained
c.
The community and other link groups

were informed of school performance/
d.
activities
The support/contribution of link
groups/ partners was acknowledged
(5) All indicators were met

(4) 3 indicators were met
(2) 1 indicator was met
(1) No indicator was met
14
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
School
1. Revisit the SIP and initiate the
Leadership
Management and
Operations
(25%)
preparation and/or revision of AIP at the

AIP/APP with the stakeholders at least
once a year
Accomplishments
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE
April
4%
October

a.
Conducted a school strategic plan
through strategic planning process

All school stakeholders were engaged in
the strategic planning process
c. Use monitoring and evaluation for process
b.
MOVs
Minutes of
planning conference
Attendance Sheet
Monitoring forms
Evaluation sheets
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
and basis for revision of the SIP/AIP/APP

(5) All indicators were met with minor
revisions and submitted SIP/AIP/APP
Accepted SIP
Approved
AIP/APP
ahead of schedule.
SIP/AIP/APP with minor revision and
submitted on schedule
(3) All indicators were met with major
revision and submitted on schedule
behind schedule.
(1) Less than 3 indicators were met and
submitted behind schedule.
(5) 100% of the activities stipulated in the
2.
Implement and monitor the
May-
utilization of the SIP/AIP/APP
April
Accomplishment
5%
SIP/AIP/APP were implemented and
report
supportedwithcompleteMOVs
Narrative Report
Pictorials

supported by complete MOVs
supported with complete MOVs.
15
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

MOVs
Actual
Results
Score
Rating

(1) Less than 50% of activities stipulated in
the SIP/AIP/APP were implemented and
3. Perform fiscal management
functions monthly
January-
(5) Claimed MOOE allocation for 12 months

in a fiscal year.
December
A. Claim of MOOE
2%
Liquidation Reports
(4) Claimed MOOE allocation for 10-11

months in a fiscal year
B. Liquidation of MOOE
2%
(5) Liquidated MOOE on or before due date.
Liquidation Reports
(4) Liquidated MOOE 1 week after the due

date
(3) Liquidated MOOE 2 weeks after the due
date
(2) Liquidated MOOE 3 weeks after the due
date
(1) Liquidated MOOE more than 3 weeks
after the due date
16
TARGET
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
4. Allocate MOOE and other school
TIMELINE
Accomplishments
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE
3%

a. With clear financial management
MOVs
Liquidation Reports
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
funds in accordance to mandated
system for the school supported with
Stock Card/RIS/
expenditures and priority needs.
evidences such as reports, account logs
ARE
and data base systems
Distribution List
b. Allocated/ prioirtized funds for programs

and school facilities, improvement and
maintenance.
c. Monitored, accounted and reported
utilization of school funds
d. Reported sources and uses of funds.
(5) All indicators were met
(4) Three indicators were met.
(3 ) Only two indicators were met
(2) Only one indicator was met
(1) None of the indicators was
accomplished
5.
Prepare and submit 75% of required

reports on time.
JanuaryDecember
3%
(5) 130% and above of required reports
File copies
were submitted on time.

(4) 115 - 129% of required reports were
of Reports
submitted on time.
submitted on time.
submitted on time.
(1) 50% -below of required reports were
submitted on time.
6.
Manage the utilization of the 75% of
data in the Education Management
January-
4%
Management of the Educational
Updated EMIS
Management Information System included:
December
a.
Information System
Organizing data
17
TARGET
Accomplishments
MFO
KRA/Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

b.
Updating of data
c.
Establishing profile from data gathered
d.
Disseminating data
e.
Utilizing data
MOVs
(5) All indicators were done

(4) 4 indicators were done
(1) Only 1 indicator was done
7. Resolve 75% of the school conflict.
JanuaryDecember
2%
Conflict was managed when:
Copy of complaints,
a.
School complaint/grievance committee
Minutes of
organized
Coferences
Issues/problems/concerns were acted
Memorandum for
b.
on time
c.
d.
Facts were gathered and verified
Grievnace
Parties were encouraged to discuss
Committee
differences to arrive at a settlement

e.
Designation as
Members
Appropriate action was taken
(5) All indicators were met or there is

no conflict
(1) Only 1 indicator was met
Overall Rating
Actual
Results
Score
Rating
Rater
Ratee
The Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) Guide was formulated by the assigned Focus Groups in consideration to the comments
suggestions, and recommendations of the teachers and school/district/division officials collected through consultative conferences done within the Division
Focus Group: IPCR for Principals
Chairperson:
LUZMINDA B. JASMIN
Members:
ELY CATALUA
ANTONIA S. JUMAWAN
JOAN M. NIONES
Recommending Approval:
OLIVA P. MIRANDA
Officer-in-Charge
Office of the Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Approved:
RECOLITO Y DE LOS REYES, Ed. D.
Schools Division Superintendent

Principal Ipcr (Final)

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Principal Ipcr (Final)

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

(For Principals/School Heads)

supervisory plan on 3rd-4th week of

Prepare school year instructional

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (Quality,

May within a rating period

Plan was needs based

a.) Class Observation

Objectives were attainable

b.) Checking of Forms

Objectives were well-defined

c.) Checking of LPs/ Different DepED

Plan was developed with teachers

Monitoring and evaluation scheme

(5) All indicators were met without any

revision and submitted ahead of

(4) All indicators were met with minor

Spot Test Results

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (Quality,

(1) Less than 4 indicators were met with

2.) Observe at least 10 teachers in

(5) Observed 130% and above of the

revision and submitted ahead of

21-25 teachers observe 3 times a

(2) Observed 51 - 99% of the targetted

50 - above teachers observe once a

(1) Observed 50% -below of the targetted

forms of teachers with the following

(5) Inspected 130% and above of the

3.1) DLL - weekly

(4) Inspected 115-129% of the targetted

3.2) School Forms - Monthly

percentage of DLL and school forms.

3.3) Form 137 & 138 - Quarterly

(3) Inspected 100%- 114% of the targetted

3.4) Other forms - as needed

percentage of DLL and school forms.

(Note: Items 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 & 3.4 shall

(2) Inspected 51% -99% of the targetted

be rated individually. Sum of the

percentage of DLL and school forms.

5-15 teachers observe 5 times a

3. Inspect 75 % of DLL and school

(1) Inspected 50% -below of the targetted

Improve pupils learning outcome

4.1) 2% increase in NAT VI and

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (Quality,

(5) Achieved 130% and above of the

targetted percentage in NAT.

Year IV over that of the

(4) Achieved 115-129% of the targetted

4.2) General Scholastic Average

(5) Achieved 130% and above of the

targetted percentage of students/puipls

75% of Grade I and II pupils shall be

(4) Attained 115-129% of the targeted

75% of the year I to IV students shall be

instructional readers in English and

(3) Attained 100 - 114% of the targetted

be instructional readers in both

English and Filipino

(5) Attained 130% and above of the

targetted percentage of students/pupils

instructional readers in Mother Tongue