Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Page 1 of 53
Table of Contents
DIRECTIONS FOR READERS
PART I RESPONSE TO STANDARDS (GENERAL EDUCATION AND EDUCATION SPECIALIST)
STANDARD 1: PROGRAM RATIONALE AND DESIGN
STANDARD 2: COMMUNICATION AND COLLABORATION
STANDARD 3: SUPPORT PROVIDERS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROVIDERS
STANDARD 4: FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
STANDARD 5: PEDAGOGY
STANDARD 6: UNIVERSAL ACCESS: EQUITY FOR ALL STUDENTS
STANDARD 7: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS FOR EDUCATION SPECIALIST
PART II DOCUMENTATION THAT SUPPORTS HOW THE STANDARDS ARE ADDRESSED
PT Course Content
Pacing Guide
IHE Transition Document
Intake Individual Induction Plan (IIP)
Education Specialist IIP For Prof. Development
Individual Induction Plan
SCOE Organization Chart
2042 Induction Eligibility
PT QUICK START
Early Completion Options Application
General Education Task Summary
Education Specialist Task Summary
Participating Teacher Hours
Weekly Conversation Record
MyBTSA Educational Resources
Prof. Induction Presentation (PIP) Prep Rubric
Managed BTSA Tasks
Continuum of Teaching Practice
Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities
Design Team Members
PT Roles and Responsibilities
Education Specialist Task Intake Advisement
Conversation Guide Education Specialist
Level 2 Needs Assessment
Level 2 Competency Portfolio Reflections
Region 3 Menu of Options
Standards Portfolio Review Rubric
Cap Reg. Teacher Prep Network (CRTPN) Roster
CRTPN Agreements
Teacher Prep and Induction Alignment Chart
District Budgets
MOU
MOU Self-Funded
FACT Inquiry Cycle
Roles & Responsibilities of Site Administrators
Check-In with Site Administrator
Site Orientation Checklist
SP Selection Process
Page 2 of 53
Biennial Report
Institutional Summary
Page 3 of 53
Page 4 of 53
Program Description
Extended Preparation
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium believes that students succeed when teachers succeed. Thus, PTs
build on skills acquired in teacher preparation, grow as professional educators, and commit to
continuing in this important profession.
Components of our local program design which is intended to purposefully build on the knowledge
and skills learned in teacher preparation include:
Weekly one-on-one collaborative assistance to Participating Teachers (PTs) by exemplary
teachers that are trained as Support Providers (SPs) in beginning teacher development, adult
learning theory, state adopted academic frameworks and student content standards, the
California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTPs), Induction Standards, formative
assessment processes, reflective conversations, and Education Specialist Clear Credential
requirements as applicable. For Education Specialist candidates, this individual coaching
provides opportunities to reflect on their practices based on identified Individual Induction
Plan (IIP) goals (e.g. provide necessary services to students in their Least Restrictive
Environment, support with Case Management, participation in transition planning,
Advocacy, Consultation and Collaboration, Co-teaching and/or Professional Learning
Communities).
Utilization of Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) for identification of
teaching strengths and areas for professional growth. The PT's journey through the FACT
system is charted in the Yr. 1 and Yr. 2 PT Induction Course Content and Induction
Pacing Guide. The formative assessment system has also been adapted to meet the needs of
Education Specialists involved in the credential program. FACT is designed to build on the
knowledge and skills learned in teacher preparation, support application of knowledge in
the classroom, and provide continual reflection for improving practice.
Ongoing use of the Individual Induction Plan (IIP) beginning with the exit IHE Transition
Document when available from the teacher preparation program. The PT, in collaboration
with his or her SP, and based on evidence, formally plans the best next steps for
professional development. Depending on the credential, the PT completes a General
Education Intake IIP or the Education Specialist IIP for Professional Growth. This
document frames the PTs path for inquiry and professional growth.
Professional learning opportunities are offered through regional Subject Matter Projects,
professional learning workshops offered through districts, online offerings (e.g.PD360,
Page 5 of 53
CTAP), and induction book study (e.g. Teach Like a Champion) that are intended to expand
skills of candidates and hone their application of the Induction Standards.
1.3 and is
consistent with
Education Code.
Consortium leaders are committed to a program design that meets the individual needs of all PTs.
Thus, program leaders selected the Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) as the
design for work with new teachers. FACT documents structure a series of critical thinking tasks that
focus on student achievement and the individual demonstration of teaching practice, combined with
reflective assessment. As teachers use the documents and processes that comprise the system, they
engage in ongoing learning that uncovers areas of strength and growth. The design is individualized
to meet teachers needs because it uses:
Action Research
PTs engage in inquiries during each year of participation with the intent that the research
they conduct informs and changes their practice in the future. Because this research is
carried out with their students and at the school in which they work, the inquiry question
deals with the educational matters of interest and of consequence to them. The FACT
documents help PTs assess their needs, plan professional development that will inform their
inquiry, create an action plan based on their inquiry question, document the steps of their
own inquiry, and make informed decisions towards outcomes. Teachers move from the
theoretical constructs introduced in teacher preparation, to classroom-based research that
addresses concerns that are owned by them-- ones that they can influence and change.
Reflection
Participating in the education field means committing to becoming a life-long learner.
Reflection is the act of stepping back and examining what one is doing in the classroom and
how actions affect student learning, i.e. are students engaged? Do they understand the
concepts? Are they able to apply what they learn? Thoughtful examination requires honest
self-analysis and confidential, open communication with colleagues. Conversation Guides
are documents used by SPs that help structure this conversation. Thus, PTs in the
Sacramento Consortium are required to engage in reflective writing and conversation. This
work is saved on our BTSA server so that PTs can access and make sense of their
experiences, learn from them, and develop new understandings and appreciation. PTs
attend a culminating end-of-year event to synthesize their learning from the induction
experience. Event facilitators are prepared to facilitate this task and may include SCOE
staff, support providers, BTSA Coordinators, and administrators.
Engagement and Completion
The PTs download the FACT documents, work with their SPs, and note their progress on
the MyBTSA website, SCOEs online data collection and reporting system. The SP, the
agent who knows the PT best, verifies progress. Selected signature documents are uploaded
to the server system to provide some necessary accountability, but most activities are
situated in the collaborative work of the PT and SP.
Professional Development
The Consortium provides suggested options for relevant and meaningful BTSA professional
development opportunities. The selection of professional development is at the discretion of
the PT, in consultation with the SP and site administrators, and in accordance with the
identified needs in the IIP (individually uploaded by the PT to their MyBTSA accounts).
According to the relevant Education Code referred to in this standard, an individual induction plan
(IIP) is in place for each PT and is based on an ongoing assessment of the development of the
beginning teacher. The intent of the IIP is to develop in teachers the process of examining practice
using the techniques of research. The Individual Inquiry Plan (IIP) is central to the work of the PT
in the Sacramento BTSA Consortium. General and Special Education candidates complete an intake
IIP as they enter into the program. The IIP is a plan that builds upon PTs assessed strengths and
needs, defines an area of focus, and outlines specific action plans for facilitating growth and
development. SPs, working through an inquiry structure, collaborate with the PT in its development
and implementation. IIPs are revised and changed based on new understandings that arise in
discussions, and are reconsidered and changed according to the PTs emerging needs. By using
Page 6 of 53
research procedures, teachers learn to resolve teaching challenges. PTs upload their IIPs through their
password protected MyBTSA account so that their SP, District Coordinator, and SCOE support staff
can monitor their progress.
Although IIPs primarily address the unique needs of PTs, taking into account prior preparation and
experience, common topics and activities emerge that can be addressed by the program. For example,
Benchmark seminars provide support for the Induction standards (Pedagogy, Equity, Teaching English
Learners, and Teaching Special Populations). PTs also access training if they need additional support
in these areas.
1.4 It is relevant
to the
contemporary
conditions of
teaching and
learning and
provides for
coordination of
the administrative
components of the
program such as
admission,
advisement,
participant
support and
assessment,
support provider
preparation, and
program
evaluation.
Participants use their current (contemporary) work assignments as the focus of their induction work.
The program is designed to flexibly meet the differing needs of teachers in districts and charters and
private schools.
The Sacramento County Office of Education Organizational Chart presents the administrative
structure of the program and the roles of the leaders within the scope of the organization. Roles and
Responsibilities are defined for site administrators, advisory team, and district coordinators, and are
reviewed, updated, and kept on file in the BTSA Office.
The Program Directors use a participatory management style that includes the following stakeholder
groups:
SCOE Assistant Superintendent, Instructional Support Services
BTSA program staff
SCOE Educator Credentialing Advisory Council
District BTSA Coordinators and Design Team
The SCOE Educator Credentialing Advisory Council
The Advisory Council Roster reflects current and relevant expertise in educator preparation programs,
induction, human resources, school administration and leadership, professional development, and
special education. Council members include BTSA and administrator training program staff,
professional development providers, curriculum and instruction personnel, HR personnel, principals
and superintendents/assistant superintendents. The Advisory Council meets quarterly. Agendas include
reports from Institute of Higher Education (IHE) partners, discussion of teacher preparation and
induction standards, policies regarding admission, advisement and professional development, local and
state updates, budget, and program evaluation. FACT documents are shared and discussed so that the
Advisory Council members are informed about the program.
BTSA Coordinators
The coordinators role is to implement the program successfully within his or her district in
accordance with our BTSA goals. Each partner selects a district coordinator based on criteria, capacity
and interest according to the programs written roles and responsibilities for district coordinators. All
partners, including charters and private schools, are represented by a BTSA coordinator. They are
administrators, teachers-on-special assignment, and/or classroom teachers. District coordinators meet
regularly with the directors, and representatives meet quarterly with the Advisory Council. Each
district coordinator is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the induction program within his or
her district. Districts follow program guidelines to determine the amount of FTE (full-time
equivalency) needed to effectively implement the program.
Design Team
The design team (interested district coordinators) takes a collaborative role in the leadership of the
Sacramento BTSA Consortium. Design Team members meet monthly to discuss teacher preparation,
induction standards, professional development, and program evaluations. They are invited to attend
Cluster One FACT training when appropriate. They evaluate and help design the program components
based on program surveys, reports and assessments. Additionally, design team members give input
about the agendas for the coordinator meetings and facilitate the Benchmark seminar sessions.
Page 7 of 53
Page 8 of 53
completeness and to attend an End-of-Year Summative Event. Each candidate presents formative
assessment evidence that relates to each Induction Standard (Pedagogy, Equity, Teaching English
Learners, and Teaching Special Populations). In order to better communicate completion requirements,
PTs and their SPs use a Professional Induction Presentation (PIP) Preparation Rubric to evaluate
their work. Facilitators use protocol sheets to help the PT present and ensure that the evidence
presented is complete. BTSA directors recommend all candidates who complete all work using the
online credential recommendation system through CTC. If candidates do not complete all
requirements, they are offered special assistance and support to finish (see above). Records are
maintained of all recommendations and all CTC verifications.
5) Support Provider Preparation (see also 3.2)
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium provides professional development for SPs when they initially
assume their roles, and offers additional opportunities to acquire and enhance their knowledge and
skills. Training builds skills in developing and maintaining learning-focused relationships,
collaborating as professional learning team members, as well as the appropriate use of the instruments
and processes of the formative assessment system. At the BTSA Benchmark Seminars, SPs have time
to meet with each other to develop and refine their skills, and to problem solve, assess, and reflect on
teaching. The program assesses the quality of services provided by SPs to PTs using multiple sources
of evidence, including information from PTs, and provides formative assessment feedback to SPs.
Districts retain only those SPs who are successful based on evidence.
6) Evaluation Plan
Program goals and intended outcomes are reviewed and revised on an ongoing basis utilizing the
formative assessment process which includes:
Formal written evaluation (e.g. State Spring Survey and SCOEs Mid-Year survey) from PTs,
SPs, site administrators, district coordinators, and program leadership
Annual retention data study
Workshop evaluations
MyBTSA
Reports and informal contacts between district BTSA coordinators and stakeholders
Conversations with other BTSA program directors and universities within the region
Results from these multiple sources of data collection are shared in the BIR accountability documents
(See PA Part III) and examined and evaluated by all stakeholders in the following settings:
SCOE Educator Credentialing Advisory Council meetings
Design Team meetings and District Coordinator meetings
Support Provider Benchmark meetings
Based on input from all of the above forums, program goals and intended outcomes are reviewed and
revised as necessary by program staff. Some examples of how the program is responsive to data
include revisions to MyBTSA, end-of-year event protocols and the collection process for Program
Standards.
1.5 The program
design provides
systematic
opportunities for
the application
and demonstration
of the pedagogical
knowledge and
skills acquired in
the preliminary
credential
Page 9 of 53
program.
Support and assistance is offered through FACT, a structured, yet flexible, formative assessment that
consists of a series of documents that focus teachers through a Plan, Teach, Reflect, and Apply process,
and blends teaching knowledge with performance. It is designed for credentialed first and second year
teachers with the assistance of trained and experienced educators. The process is grounded in a
developmental view of teaching.
FACT uses the following:
Standards: Descriptions of the knowledge, skills, and abilities described in the Combined CSTP
CTP (scales describing teaching practice at five levels of accomplishment) in conjunction with the
academic and performance standards for students and the Induction Program Standards for
teachers.
Evidence: Evidence is generated through standards driven inquiry, formal observations, and
examining student results. Evidence about teaching is collected over time and examined against the
CTP.
Assessment: A process of examining practice against teaching standards.
Plan, Teach, Reflect, and Apply: This cycle guides the FACT process and helps PTs become
reflective practitioners. The assessment documents enable PTs to better meet the learning needs of
their students, to grow as professionals, and to attain greater confidence in their skills. PTs and SPs
have opportunities for close collaboration as PTs examine their practice. FACT formative
assessment documents encourage thoughtful reflection on professional practice.
The conceptual components embedded in FACT are:
CSDC--Understanding the Teaching Contexts: PTs learn about their teaching environment and the
resources and challenges. With an SP, PTs discuss prompts focused on their classroom, school,
district, and community. The information gathered guides classroom decision-making and helps
identify areas for professional growth.
FACT Inquiries: A research-based cycle of standards-focused processes is used to explore an area
of teaching practice. In collaboration with a SP, PTs assess their practice against a set of specific
criteria and select a focus area. Within the cycle, PTs gather information, collaborate with
colleagues, develop and implement an action plan, reflect on collected evidence, and apply new
learning to future practice.
Observation of Classroom Practice: A trained SP observes a PT as they teach, collecting evidence
of teaching practice and students learning. SPs record what the students and teachers say and do.
Continuum of Teaching Practice (CTP). The CTP defines five levels of teaching performance
based against the CSTPs. As PTs use the CTP, they indicate the date of assessment of current
practice.
Individual Induction Plans (IIP): IIPs help the PTs make sense of what they are doing and focus
effort. The IIPs are integral to FACT. The PT considers his or her practice, school or district
Page 10 of 53
priorities, and other challenges and outlines specific action plans for facilitating growth and
development.
Reflection and Self-Assessment: Conversation Guides and self-assessment documents prompt
reflection about student learning and teaching practice, assist the formulation of professional goals
to improve teaching practice, and guide, monitor, and assess the progress of the teachers practice
towards professional goals and benchmarks.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium conducts quarterly Benchmark Seminars as support for all
Participating Teachers and Support Providers. Each seminar includes an issue-solving session in rolealike groups. In addition, candidates are offered a choice of topics to select as a focus for an interactive
session that best fits their needs. Topics for these seminars are generated from mid-year and state
survey data and input from District Coordinators, the Design Team, and veteran Support Providers. A
support provider who is trained as a Professional Development Provider facilitates and serves as a
resource for each session. Participants are provided an opportunity to collaborate with participants from
different grade levels, content areas, and contexts.
The program collaborates with identified partners to the Consortiums defined written program plan
and Memorandums of Understanding (MOU / MOU Self-Funded) create an umbrella of
standardization, while allowing the flexibility to address each partners unique school culture. This
structure allows for local control while providing consistency from one partner to another. A PT or an
SP may move from his or her district to another district within the Consortium, and while they would
find individual district differences, the structure of the BTSA Program is the same.
District Professional Development Resources
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium works collaboratively and cooperatively with each sponsoring
district regarding professional development by advertising PD offerings across partners. By
collaborating with school, district, and partner organizations, overlapping initiatives and program
offerings are streamlined with the intent to eliminate redundancies. In order to not overwhelm PTs and
to ensure that PD is specifically and explicitly tied to identified needs, PTs select from district
professional development activities, subject matter project offerings in the area, and/or Consortium
provided professional development. Each individual participant documents this selection on the
Consortium Web-based database. For example, when a district is providing AB 472 training in
Reading/Language Arts or Mathematics, a PT may integrate this training into his/her Individual
Induction Plan (IIP). MyBTSA reports require PTs to indicate how professional development activities
meet identified needs stated in the Individual Induction Plan.
BTSA SPs are encouraged to work with site administrators and PTs to arrange a check-in with Site
Administrator conferences that include the site administrator, the SP and the PT. The purpose of these
meetings is to ensure that the PT and SP understand site and district expectations while allowing the PT
to share his/her induction work (e.g. focus questions and inquiries) so that the BTSA experience is
integrated with district activities. SCOE BTSA provides a template for this process and works with
district coordinators to make this a part of the BTSA culture.
ES 1 The design
involves
collaboration
between the
approved clear
credential
program and the
employer, offering
multiple
opportunities for
Page 11 of 53
support and
professional
development of
Education
Specialist
candidates in their
early years of
teaching
ES 2 Education
specialist teachers
shall select
appropriate
professional
development
and/or preparation
program-based
coursework to
expand skills and
to pursue
advanced study
with consideration
of assignment and
Education
Specialist
authorization
ES 3 These skills
should be
designed to
enhance the
participants
teaching abilities
and reflect inquiry
based
methodology and
reflective practice.
The Consortium collects information about professional development offered through its
partners, and regional Special Education Local Plan Area (SELPA), and uses this information
to provide candidates multiple opportunities for professional development.
Candidate support is offered through SCOE Special Education Benchmark Seminars, which
include the Education Specialist candidate and his/her district assigned Support Provider (SP).
These quarterly meetings are designed to offer ongoing support and direction to candidates as
they engage in formative assessment.
Upon completion of a Preliminary Education Specialist program, candidates develop a
preliminary Induction Plan and work collaboratively with a university advisor to establish
goals for improving current practices in the field. This transition plan forms the basis for the
IIP that is designed in collaboration with the candidate, support provider, district
administrator/designee, and SCOE program leadership. This plan is shared with the employer
designee at the Intake Meeting.
Education Specialist candidates select appropriate professional development through the following
process:
IHE Transition Document: PTs in induction are expected to demonstrate skills beyond what
was demonstrated for the preliminary credential. To avoid duplicate experiences, PTs create a
transition IIP that identifies strengths and possible areas for growth or need based on previous
university experiences and with the input of their university advisor. Special Education
candidates new to our program use the FACT Alignment Chart and Discussion Guide to
review incoming documents and to compare and contrast the university experience with
induction.
Intake Meeting: The candidate in partnership with SCOE, and the district determine
professional development activities. The goal is to support the candidate in their development
as an effective and reflective practitioner. An intake meeting is scheduled with each Special
Education candidate and includes SCOE staff, the SP or special education designee. Education
Specialist candidates complete an Intake Advisement Form. Education Specialist
credentialing is complex and multi-layered. This survey assists district and Consortium leaders
to provide appropriate advising and program support that takes job assignment into
consideration, type of credential held, long term goals and additional requirements that may be
necessary to meet the clear credential.
Needs Assessment: The program has a formal process for review to determine prior
knowledge, skills, and abilities acquired during teacher preparation. A growth plan is designed
that identifies the coursework, experiences and tasks that should be completed. All Special
Education candidates use an adapted Education Specialist Guide in conjunction with their
Support Providers to identify strengths and areas for growth.
Level 2 candidates who must address the 1997 standards, also complete Special Education
Level 2 Needs Assessment based on these standards in tandem with the Transition Plan
prepared during their preliminary credential preparation to help identify skills to be expanded
and advanced content to be pursued.
Credential advisement, a needs survey, and support provider conversation are used to create a
Special Education Specialist IIP for Professional Growth. The plan is designed for the
individual candidate, the specific needs of the employer, and the current skill level of the
candidate.
Professional Development Opportunities: Education Specialists are provided with a Menu of
Options (Benchmark seminar topics, Professional Development Super Saturdays, university
course offerings, school/district/county professional development, etc.) designed to expand
skills and to enable the candidate to pursue advanced study. This menu is developed
collaboratively with the partners and includes professional development activities identified by
SCOE in partnership with the districts, regional SELPA, and the IHEs to support the candidate
as an effective and reflective practitioner.
Professional Development Opportunities (Also see 1.6 above)
With the wide range of service delivery options possible, an Education Specialist credential holder may
be placed in a situation where support alone may not be enough to address the knowledge and skills
necessary to successfully provide the services needed by special needs students in their assignment. The
Page 12 of 53
Consortium offers professional learning opportunities through Benchmark Seminars and through Super
Saturday Support Seminars.
Transitional Support for Level 2 Candidates: Candidates who completed a Level 1 (1997) teacher
preparation program may have content gaps. Seminars and BTSA-sponsored Professional Development
Seminars provide advanced preparation to support the professional development needs of the general
education and education specialist candidates. SPs attend quarterly seminars with the PTs in order to
assist with implementation in the context of the PTs current assignments and to integrate the formative
assessment activities. Depending on IIP goals, PD Saturdays will support Education Specialists in
gaining a deeper understanding of content. Level 2 candidates document their Mastery of Competency
Requirements through a portfolio that is submitted in May. This portfolio is reviewed with a Level II
Competency Standards Portfolio Review Rubric.
Support workshop topics for preparing this portfolio include:
o Legal issues
o Advanced data-driven decision making
o Advanced behavioral, emotional, and environmental supports
o Transition planning
o Case management
o Consultation/collaboration
The Health requirement for Level 2 is met through an approved university course that meets the
advanced health requirements, including CPR. The technology requirement can be met through an
approved university course or through CTAP Level 2 Certification. The credential requirements are
outlined in the Intake Advisement form that takes into consideration the district's needs and candidate
short term and long-term goals.
Page 13 of 53
Sacramento BTSA Consortium Program Summary: The Sacramento County Office of Education (SCOE) is the LEA for
the Sacramento Induction Consortium Program. Program co-sponsors include school districts, charter schools, charter school
organizations, and schools affiliated with the Association of Christian Schools International (ACSI), Northern California, and
the Diocese of Sacramento. Strong partnerships have also been formed with Sacramento State University, University of CA
Davis, private universities with campuses in the Sacramento region, and intern programs serving Capital Region districts
such as Fortune School of Education. Representatives from co-sponsors are members of the SCOE Educator Credentialing
Advisory Council and/or the Capital Region Teacher Preparation Network. At these meetings, information is shared in a
reciprocal fashion.
District and site administrators, SCOE Educator Credentialing Advisory Council members, and other appropriate
stakeholders receive detailed information regarding the goals, design, roles and responsibilities, and credential
requirements of the Sacramento Consortium Program. The district superintendent or his/her designee annually signs a
district Memorandum of Understanding that defines the responsibilities of the co-sponsor and the Sacramento Induction
Consortium. Site administrators are invited to attend training focused on support for the new teacher. Additional
ongoing training and information is provided through informal site administrator meetings facilitated by the district
coordinator. District and site administrators collaborate with district coordinators and SCOE program staff to provide the
most optimal conditions and support for participating beginning teachers.
Standard
Program Description
The Sacramento County Office of Education Induction Program joins with other induction
program leaders in the Capital Region to establish links with the following general and special
education teacher preparation programs: Sacramento State University, University of California,
Davis, University of San Diego, National University, Brandman, William Jessup, University of
Phoenix, Project Pipeline Intern Program, and the North Coast Beginning Teacher Program
through the Capital Region Teacher Preparation Network (CRTPN). This network is
designed to provide explicit opportunities for BTSA Directors and university teacher preparation
faculty to communicate and collaborate. The CRTPN Agreements define the intent for
reciprocal information sharing around the Learning-to-Teach continuum. The IHE articulation
meetings are hosted at SCOE and are attended by representatives of the university partners listed
above. Regular agenda items include: discussion of credential requirement changes, university
course information, available seminars, induction formative assessment documents, and strategies
for supporting the transition from teacher preparation to induction. Through this partnership,
BTSA/IHE agreements were created to 1) apply BTSA experiences to Level 2 Special Education
coursework, 2) to use Level 2 coursework as equivalency for some MS and SS induction
requirements, and 3) create a pathway for BTSA participants who were concurrently enrolled in
an MA program. Other agreements with CSUS include the option to award participating teachers
(PTs) graduate level units. A representative of this group attends the SCOE Educator
Credentialing Advisory Council meetings.
As part of agreed upon roles regarding communication, consortium staff members are
periodically invited to visit university credential courses to inform candidates about BTSA
Induction. University faculty provides additional information about BTSA induction and the clear
credential options during their advisement sessions with candidates nearing the end of the
preliminary credential program. University credential analysts participate in the conversations
about BTSA induction and the clear credential options.
At the BTSA Orientation, participating teachers (PTs) are introduced to documents that connect
teacher preparation, induction, and special education clear credential standards. PTs and support
providers (SPs) engage in conversation about the teacher preparation program experience to
Page 14 of 53
identify effective skills learned and implemented in practice and to pinpoint areas of need. The
Teacher Preparation and Induction Alignment Chart helps compare and contrast the
standards, the expectations and the processes of teacher preparation and induction. The goal is for
PTs to share experiences from teacher preparation with their SPs in order to validate and build
upon the work completed during teacher preparation and to engage in a self-assessment process.
Year 2 PTs begin their second year by reflecting and self-assessing on Year 1.
The Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) is built upon a conceptual framework
that includes an articulated foundation, processes, and a structure. The foundation of FACT
include the CA Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP), the Induction Standards; Special
Education Clear Credential Standards, the P-12 Content Standards for students, and evidence
generated through data, including observations, student work, lesson plans, and recorded
reflections. (See also 1.6) The program relies on FACT process pacing guides to ensure that PTs
and SPs have sufficient support to understand and demonstrate advanced skills and knowledge.
PTs use a sophisticated online data collection and reporting system (MyBTSA) to maintain records
of their progress through induction. Because the Individual Induction Plan (IIP) is central to
tracking growth, PTs file IIPs on line so that SPs, district coordinators, and SCOE staff can
monitor the implementation of the inquiry. MyBTSA also captures a record of weekly
conversations and professional development completed by each PT. PTs also upload selected
pieces from the Inquiry Cycle (Essential Components, Focus Student Selection, Analysis of
Students Work, and Summative Assessment Reflection) so that SPs can track activities as PTs
explore aspects of their teaching practice. These documents provide an array of evidence that PTs
are applying what they are learning in teacher preparation around pedagogy, equity, teaching
English learners, and teaching special populations.
The BTSA Directors collaborate regularly with district partners through the district BTSA
coordinator. The BTSA Directors schedule annual meetings with district leaders and district
coordinators to review the BTSA Program within the context of the district, present new
information, clarify understandings, and listen to specific district needs. District teams may
include the superintendent, assistant superintendent of human resources, assistant superintendent
of business services, Special Education Local Plan Area (SELPA), Special Education department
staff, BTSA advisor and BTSA district coordinator. Some of the topics reviewed include partner
roles and agreements, the status of interns, budgets, end-of-year reports, incomplete participants,
general and special education credential requirements, and SP selection. An MOU / MOU SelfFunded is signed at that time.
District credential analysts work with SCOE staff and with BTSA Coordinators to share 2042
Induction Eligibility Charts to identify eligible teachers and to ensure that clear credential
eligibility, requirements for participation, and completion are clearly communicated to new hires.
Credential analysts communicate with district coordinators regarding new hires, after reviewing
their credentials. The BTSA Coordinator contacts all eligible new hires and notifies them of the
requirement to attend an Induction orientation. This contact may be followed up with phone calls
and personal welcomes. The Consortium leadership is responsible for offering sound advice,
assistance, and up-to-date information about PT credentialing issues.
A SCOE orientation is held for all eligible PTs that fully disclose the requirements of the BTSA
induction program. All participants register on MyBTSA. All program requirements are listed on
My BTSA in a resource called Participating Teacher Handbook so that individual PTs, SPs,
BTSA Coordinators, and BTSA staff can monitor progress as PTs work towards successful
completion of the Induction Program and towards a clear credential. Coordinators work with
SCOE to formally monitor progress in February of each school year.
SPs and PTs work collaboratively to ensure that continuity exists between induction activities and
Page 15 of 53
the PTs ongoing individual professional growth plans. District/school consortium partners
determine the curricular and instructional priorities for their new teachers and are asked to share
their annual professional development plans through their BTSA coordinators.
SPs schedule a Check-in with Site Administrator conference (SP, PT, and site administrator) to
discuss school and district goals and how they interface with BTSA activities. Each district
coordinator receives a template for structuring that conversation with their SP. PTs use the
MyBTSA record of professional development to show a relationship between identified growth
needs on the IIP and professional development activities selected by the PT.
2.4 Collaboration
between the induction
program and
administrators
establishes a
professional, educational
community, ensuring
structures that support
the activities of
induction and
coordinating additional
site/district professional
development
opportunities.
Many district partners are engaged in building professional/small, learning communities (PLCs or
SLCs). In these settings, teachers are regularly engaged in professional and reflective
conversations focused on data and evidence. In meetings with administrators, a parallel is drawn
between the professional learning community process and the FACT Inquiry Cycle (PTs gather
baseline information, assess their current professional practice, prepare a plan of professional
development in an area targeted for growth, engage in data-gathering, implement and modify
their action plan, reflect on the activities, analyze what they have learned, and implement new
learning). These IIP activities are designed to inform the PTs practice and to focus future
professional growth.
Additional meetings are established as needed. SCOE BTSA Directors and support staff operate
an open door policy regarding communication. Emails, phone calls, faxes, requests for
information, etc., are responded to on a regular, frequent basis.
Site and district administrators understand that the PT and the SP in the Sacramento BTSA
Consortium Program are expected to meet regularly so that the PT is able to consider the
formative assessment evidence that he or she collects with the assistance of the SP. The PT is
able to use this evidence to develop a well-planned, systematic Individual Induction Plan (IIP) to
improve the knowledge, skills, and abilities required to be an effective professional educator.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium, in tandem with BTSA Coordinators, offers ongoing
opportunities for professional development for site and district administrators. The preferred
method of providing professional development for our administrators is to work with the
superintendent to offer district-specific professional development related to induction tailored to
the needs of an individual school district.
The revised modules from Roles and Responsibilities of P-12 School Organizations are used for
site administrator training and include topics such as: What is Induction; Culture of Support for
Beginning Teachers; Understanding the Role of the SP; and Formative Assessment and
Leadership in Systems Reform. Training is provided to district and site administrators on how to
utilize the CSTP for classroom observation and reflection. Administrators also discuss how to
best support PTs who have more challenging work environments such as combination
classrooms, special education students, English learners, multiple preparations, and/or lack of
resources. A key aspect of this training is the understanding and effort by the administrator to
create a work environment in which a new teacher can succeed.
Appropriate support services for all PTs are outlined in the co-sponsoring partner MOU / MOU
Self-Funded and site administrator roles and responsibilities. These documents are a
commitment between the Sacramento BTSA Consortium and co-sponsoring districts to ensure
that PTs receive appropriate support services. The Consortium and the employer collaborate
regarding the professional development of Education Specialist candidates.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium has written Roles and Responsibilities of Site
Administrators. Each BTSA Coordinator meets with District Site Administrators once or twice a
Page 16 of 53
year to review and discuss the induction program and site administrator roles and responsibilities,
which include:
Conducting an initial orientation (Site Orientation Checklist) for PTs to inform them
about site resources, personnel, procedures, and policies
o Introducing PTs to the staff, and connecting them in the school's professional
learning community
o Helping to focus the learning community on the State-adopted academic content
standards and performance levels for students and the California Standards for the
Teaching Profession (CSTPs)
o Supporting the inquiry process and integrating it into the schools professional
learning community activities
o Ensuring that site-level professional development activities related to induction
occur on a consistent basis, including facilitating PTs and SPs participation
o Participating in program evaluation
Discussing program implementation strategies that work on their site
o Other identified issues related to induction, e.g. new teacher development, service
delivery options for Education Specialist credential holders, advanced professional
development opportunities available to meet IIP goals, working conditions that
optimize PTs' success, effective steps to overcome challenging aspects of teachers
work environments, and the foundations and processes of the clear credential
program.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium plans to offer an induction program for Education Specialist
candidates holding Mild/Moderate and Moderate/Severe Level 1 or Preliminary Credentials.
Early Childhood Special Education teachers will be served if they are employed in a partner
school as part of the primary team.
Participating teachers in the BTSA induction education community include special education and
general education teachers. These teachers interact in the following ways:
Special Education Candidates in SCOE's program attend Benchmark seminars. Some
sessions provide an opportunity to meet as a Special Education cohort and others
provide a time to meet with general education teachers. Topics for this general session
are based on the needs generated from participation in formative assessment. The format
of these seminars encourages discussion as a learning community.
Specialized workshops are designed, in collaboration with district, SELPA, and Special
Education department staff, to support Participating Teachers in their abilities to provide
necessary services to students in their Least Restrictive Environment. Topics include
Case Management, Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP)/Individual Education
Program (IEP), transition planning teams, advocacy, consultation and collaboration, coteaching and/or Professional Learning Community (ies). Consortium directors,
Education Specialist trainers, and members of the leadership team have special
education expertise and they provide ongoing guidance and feedback regarding program
design to ensure that professional development meets the needs of Education Specialist
MyBTSA allows Consortium leadership to access and verify credentials, experience, professional
development records, and job assignments for all active participants. The system produces
numerous reports that allow the program to identify and tap into the expertise within the
Consortium. Those with identified expertise are assigned as support providers, content specialists,
and professional development providers. The program ensures that the most qualified support
provider is matched with the participating teacher. If an exact credential match is not possible,
then the program provides a content specialist to support and augment the expertise of the
assigned support provider. The database system includes information from IHE partners in the
region.
Page 17 of 53
teachers.
An annual end-of-year Professional Induction Presentation (PIP) event includes all
participating teachers in interactive dialogue about their practice
Special Education teachers in the Sacramento BTSA Consortium participate in FACT
with their general education counterparts.
Support providers hone their collaborative skills using tools from Mentoring Matters.
These skills are used intentionally to promote a collaborative atmosphere within the
BTSA education community.
District/school partners within the Consortium support the Education Specialist through:
Careful selection and assignment of support providers that are skilled at observing,
conversation, lesson planning, service delivery models, and other complexities
associated with the Education Specialist teaching assignment.
Benchmark reviews designed to review the candidate's progress and adjust professional
support if needed. A Check-in with Site Administrator and/or special education
district administrator/designee, support provider, and Education Specialist candidate
ensures that this is a collaborative process.
Site/Assignment Orientation Checklist: There are policies and procedures that are
important for all teachers to understand in order to be successful. The site administrator
works with the candidate to review topics listed on the checklist in order to understand
the school, district, and community context.
Special Education and general education participating teachers complete three inquiries
during their two-year participation in induction. The centerpiece of an inquiry is the IIP,
which promotes selecting issues/questions from the classroom based on evidence.
Education Specialist candidates may choose issues related to least restrictive
environment, individual education program (IEP) and transition planning, advocacy, and
the service delivery model(s) appropriate to the needs of the candidate.
PD Saturdays are provided for the Education Specialist candidate. Topics addressed at
these Saturdays include: Case management, transition planning, advocacy, consultation
and collaboration and least restrictive environments. Education Specialists work with
mentors in a learning community to address issues that are of importance to the
candidates.
Candidates spend time with their support provider identifying the Special Education
School/District/Community/ County Resources available to them. The program uses
quarterly meetings to ensure that these resources are useful and accessible.
Page 18 of 53
Standard
3.1 The induction
program selects,
prepares, and assigns
support providers and
professional
development
providers using welldefined criteria
consistent with the
providers assigned
responsibilities in the
program.
Program Description
Support Providers (SPs): Selection criteria for SPs are stated in the Coordinator Handbook. The
Sacramento BTSA Consortium provides each district BTSA coordinator with a process template
for selecting SPs. These SP Selection Process templates, which include Support Provider roles and
responsibilities and the Principals Nomination Form, are available to the BTSA coordinators and
are used in establishing the processes and procedures for support provider selection for their
district. Copies of the specific selection process are on file in the SCOE BTSA office. District
coordinators confirm on MyBTSA, SCOEs Web-based system that the selection process is in
compliance with Program Standards.
District coordinators in participating districts are responsible for the initial and ongoing matches of
SPs to PTs. This assignment is based upon the coordinators knowledge of the needs of their PTs.
Coordinators make every effort to match SPs with PTs based upon similar grade level, subject
matter, and geographical location. The assignment is made as early as possible, allowing
participants to begin their Induction work soon after entering their teaching assignment.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium carefully prepares SPs to assume their role, ensuring that they
understand and can implement the formative assessment system used by the program and have the
requisite skills to mentor a new teacher. Initial and ongoing professional development is discussed
in 3.2.
Professional Development Providers (PDPs): The Sacramento BTSA Consortium selects PDPs
for FACT training, Benchmark Seminars, and Professional Development offerings based on PDP
Selection criteria. FACT trainers for the Consortium attend training of trainers run by Cluster
Leadership to ensure a common understanding of the FACT documents. The Consortium selects
trainers who proficiently use tools from Mentoring Matters. Trainers are district coordinators who
serve as leaders in the program or SPs who are very familiar with the workings of the program, e.g.
successful use of MyBTSA, and know the policies and procedures delineated in the Coordinator
Page 19 of 53
Handbook. Only those providers who have actually been observed in action by BTSA leadership
are considered.
PDPs are selected based on their area of expertise, demonstrated ability to work with adult learners,
and their interest. Presenters apply annually to the Consortium. Roles and responsibilities and
procedures for selecting professional development providers are stated in writing on MyBTSA and
in the Coordinator Handbook.
Professional development providers are solicited through a variety of means:
Word of mouth from program participants
Recommendations from sponsoring district administrators, current BTSA Trainers, and/or
program staff
Self selection
The BTSA Directors, in collaboration with the consortium leadership design team is responsible
for selecting and assigning PDPs. The procedure for making selections and assignments is as
follows:
Analyze professional development needs based on PT and SP Needs Assessments, IIP
foci, and requirements of the induction program
Network with SCOE staff, local universities, other regional BTSA directors, and
district/site administrators to develop a list of potential PDPs
Request that providers apply on MyBTSA and provide resumes or other similar
information
Verify through applications, referrals, recommendations, interviews and/or observations
that potential providers meet the Consortium criteria
Contact potential professional providers to discuss the needs of the program and
determine availability
PDPs who staff Super Saturdays attend a training conducted by SCOE staff to familiarize them
with the operation of the Consortium. As part of this training, they review Adult Learning Theory,
the CSTPs and Induction Standards. A presentation skill-building module is introduced including
dealing with the reluctant participant. Trainers create an IIP based on a self-assessment using a
trainer CTP. All presentations are reviewed by SCOE BTSA Directors. The BTSA program offers
a contract to those professional development providers best qualified to meet the needs of the
induction program. Workshop attendees provide an evaluation of all professional development
sessions. This feedback is shared with the presenter and used by the directors to help determine
return engagements and/or refine presentations.
Initial Training:
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium provides five days of required training for SPs working with
the FACT system. This training is offered during the summer months and again when school
begins. Training sets the stage for developing a relationship with the PTs that helps the PT take a
close look at his/her context.
Multiple Ongoing Opportunities to Acquire and Enhance Coaching Skills and Abilities:
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium provides materials to SPs such as training binders, and
professional books as appropriate to training needs. SPs attend network opportunities provided
through the Consortium as follows:
SPs who have completed Year I FACT Training attend an SP Update at the beginning of
each year to review program requirements related to Program Standards 5 and 6, program
goals, upgrades to MyBTSA, FACT review, and the professional development calendar for
the year. SP User Guides and SP Timeline are distributed and reviewed to ensure that all
SPs are knowledgeable about the program and skilled in their roles. This update training is
offered multiple times. Attendance is tracked on the MyBTSA Web site.
Page 20 of 53
California Standards
for the Teaching
Profession, Effective
Teaching Standards
(Category B of the
Induction Program
Standards), as well as
the appropriate use of
the instruments and
processes of
formative assessment
systems.
All SPs attend mandatory quarterly Benchmark Seminars offered multiple times after
school. This training is aimed at helping SPs support the ongoing formative assessment
process used by the program. SPs attend these seminars with their PTs whenever possible.
These four seminars are tracked on the MyBTSA Web site.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium ensures that BTSA participants have access to
information about free or low cost PD offerings in the area (through subject matter
projects, RAFT, or in partnership with local universities). SPs are encouraged to attend
workshops with their PTs or self-select extended professional development workshops for
their own growth. Attendance is tracked on the MyBTSA Web site.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium program provides on-going training to SPs to deepen the
knowledge and skills needed to:
Formatively assess PTs on the CSTPs and in relation to the state-adopted academic content
standards and performance levels for students and state-adopted curriculum framework:
FACT training is designed around the CSTP and provides a framework for addressing the
state-adopted academic content standard and performance levels for students; therefore support
provider training in FACT provides knowledge and skills necessary to assist PTs in these
areas. The purpose of FACT training is to deepen understanding of the CSTP and the K-12
Page 21 of 53
student content standards and their application by focusing on the ongoing process of planning
and teaching lessons, reflecting on the results, and making informed changes based on
evidence. FACT extends the opportunity to examine teaching in relation to the state-adopted
student content standards and curriculum frameworks. While the CSTP remains the lens for
assessing teaching, the student content standards and curriculum frameworks form the
knowledge base.
Use the evidence from formative assessments fairly and equitably with PTs:
FACT training includes the development of skills in using evidence from formative assessment
to fairly and equitably assess PTs practice. There are multiple opportunities during training
for SPs to practice using formative assessment evidence by observing video lessons and
checking their observations against evidence. A common definition of evidence is established
in training as: observable, not influenced by observers perspective, free of evaluative words,
and no conclusions drawn. FACT training provides an explicit opportunity for SPs to practice
their skills in using evidence fairly and equitably. SPs practice gathering evidence through
scripting procedures, using an Observation Record Resource Guide, and marking the
Continuum of Teaching Practice (CTP), which is based on evidence, gathered during the
simulation. Evidence includes support provider observations, the PTs instructional plan,
reflection on the lesson, and student work.
Use assessment evidence to develop individualized induction plans with PTs that reflect the
progress of individual candidates:
FACT training provides SPs with knowledge and skills to assist PTs in the development of
Individual Induction Plans (IIP) around a focus question based upon assessment evidence.
The IIP is used to prepare a plan for professional development in an area of targeted growth,
and assist PTs and SPs in determining how best to focus their efforts in FACT. During training
SPs critique sample IIPs and discuss specifying focus questions and defining and applying
research, collecting clear evidence, and making manageable timelines strengthening an action
plan. This training ensures that SPs understand the essential characteristics of a quality IIP and
provides an opportunity to practice rephrasing statements to make a strong IIP. SPs further
develop their skills in using assessment evidence to develop IIPs at SP Updates where
additional practice around developing quality IIPs is provided. The program provides a
template to assist with the development of quality IIPs.
Page 22 of 53
instructional plan, reflection on the lesson, and student work. After completing the simulation,
the FACT trainers review SPs lesson scripting, and determine if additional instruction in
nonbiased and fair formative assessment is needed. Professional development also prepares
SPs to support PTs in using evidence from the formative assessment process to select a focus
question for an inquiry and develop a research plan.
Annual SP Update meetings (for SPs who have completed the five-day training) provide
additional opportunities to ensure that FACT is used in a fair and nonbiased way. The
Sacramento BTSA Consortium provides network opportunities through the Benchmark
Seminars during the school year for all SPs. Network topics are based on needs and include
coaching skills, support strategies, developing quality IIPs, induction support, and strategies
for transitioning the PT from the IHE to the classroom.
SP professional development also includes procedures to ensure that FACT processes are
completed in a timely manner and ways to judge completeness. SPs are instructed in how to
help PTs log conversation and professional development hours on MyBTSA. The district
coordinator monitors the completion of FACT documents to ensure that PTs have fair and
adequate time and support to engage in all program requirements.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium has clear procedures in place when considering a new match:
Through multiple venues and frequent contacts, PTs and SPs are informed and reminded
that the highest priority of the Sacramento Induction Program is that the support
provider/participating teacher matches are appropriate and working successfully. A PT or
SP may make the request for a new match at any time to a district coordinator, a district
advisor, or the BTSA consortium director. New matches are made in a timely manner,
through a no-fault system.
Upon receipt of a request for a new match, the district coordinator and/or program leader
secures confidential information from both the PTs and the support provider. Effort is
taken to recognize the sensitivities involved and to maintain respect and dignity for all
Page 23 of 53
those involved and to arrive collaboratively at the best solution to the presented issue(s).
The district coordinator and/or program leader implements the solution and monitors the
new match, if this was determined to be the solution. Appropriate information is shared as
needed, and the database is updated.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium defines Support Provider Roles and Responsibilities on
MyBTSA and in the Coordinator Handbook. These roles and responsibilities are reviewed and
discussed at the yearly Support Provider Update training. Each SP reviews and marks as complete
this document on MyBTSA as evidence of his or her commitment to the expected responsibilities
within the Sacramento BTSA Consortium. SPs complete a SP Action Plan to identify their own
professional growth needs found on the MyBTSA website.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium collects data from a variety of sources throughout the year
regarding the quality of services provided by SPs to PTs. PTs complete local mid-year and end of
year surveys and the state BTSA Survey, which are used by program leadership to identify areas of
strength and areas of need, related to services provided by SPs. The results of this data collection
are shared with each district coordinator, who in turn shares this information with their SPs. The
Consortium also provides summary information to SPs from the State Survey regarding both
Consortium-wide assessment results as well as the results for his or her individual district, when
the disaggregated information is available.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium collects written evaluation feedback from each participant for
every professional development offering. Feedback forms are shared with the professional
development provider immediately after each presentation. This Professional Development
Evaluation form, developed collaboratively with our external evaluator, is distributed and
collected at the conclusion of all Consortium professional development opportunities. These are
sent to our outside evaluator who analyzes the data and provides us with a report. SCOE Directors
and the consortium leaders review this report. This input and review helps us to evaluate and to
retain only those providers of highest quality who best meet the needs of our program participants.
PTs record topics reviewed in conversation with SPs as well as FACT documents completed.
District BTSA coordinators use MyBTSA reports to ensure that SPs meet regularly with PTs and
complete FACT processes according to the timeline. The PT completes a Participating Teacher
Assessment of Support Provider Effectiveness Survey that allows PTs to share commendations
as well as issues or concerns related to their SP. This tool provides another way to monitor the
quality of SP services. The district coordinator determines the course of action whenever there is a
concern with individual SPs. This may be indicated if MyBTSA records reflect a trend of
inadequate support, if attendance at required training and networking sessions is remiss, or if PTs
make unfavorable comments on evaluations. PTs are encouraged to contact their district
coordinator or the program directors if there are unresolved issues with SPs. In cases where it is
clear that the SP is either not able or willing to carry our his or her duties effectively as described in
the roles and responsibilities, the district coordinator selects another support provider that can
follow through with required duties. The district coordinator works with his/her respective BTSA
advisor to review the district policy and invite back only SPs that are successful.
SCOE BTSA Directors monitor professional development presenters and invite back only those
presenters who meet criteria based on staff observations and PD feedback data. When schedules
and budgets allow, the Sacramento BTSA Consortium recognizes SPs and PD presenters at an SP
Recognition Dinner. SPs that successfully complete all FACT training are presented with FACT
Certificates.
ES 3.1 Education
Specialist Support
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium requires that SPs be selected based on a selection process that
includes a careful inventory of credentials, a review of experience, peer observation, and an
Page 24 of 53
interview. The employing agency assigns each candidate to a support provider that holds the same
authorization (mild/moderate or moderate/severe, resource specialist, preschool) or has equivalent
professional background and experience within the first 30 days of enrollment in the Sacramento
BTSA Consortium's program so that the candidate and support provider can begin an IIP.
In cases where an exact one-to-one credential match cannot be made, the Consortium identifies
content specialists with the appropriate authorization either from within the Consortium, from
referrals from SELPA, or from university partners to pair with a candidate. These content
specialists work with the Special Education candidates and their SP at the Super Saturday Sessions
and the Benchmark Seminars. They also have access to MyBTSA, which provides the content
specialist an opportunity to review a candidate's ongoing work, to connect through email, and to
provide formative feedback.
SPs are provided support through MyBTSA with links to resources such as CAL Migrant Web page,
tools for tolerance, subject matter projects, and special education resources to help the SP answer
questions and provide support. In addition, SPs attend Benchmark Seminars with their PTs
conducted by special education experts who are able to connect the candidates and/or their SPs
with resources and additional help if needed.
Page 25 of 53
Sacramento BTSA Consortium Program Summary: The Sacramento BTSA Consortium utilizes the Formative
Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) system to support and inform Participating Teachers (PTs) about their
professional growth as they reflect and improve upon their teaching as part of a continuous improvement cycle.
Formative assessment data guides the classroom teacher in planning appropriate instruction to assist each student in
focusing his or her learning. Through the FACT system PTs collect evidence for Induction Standards 5 and 6, engage in
focused professional growth activities, receive individualized support from a trained Support Providers (SP) and engage
in continuous reflection and discussion of evidence in order to make professional judgments about their teaching
practice.
Standard
Program Description
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium uses the Formative Assessment for California Teachers
(FACT). PTs are partnered with veteran educators who have been trained to support novice
teachers. SPs use the skills of cognitive coaching, mentoring, and modeling to support PTs growth
in alignment with their credential authorization and teaching assignment. The Plan, Teach, Reflect,
Apply (PTRA) cycle is used to help PTs grow as professionals and meet the needs of students.
Practicing the PTRA cycle with their SPs promotes growth in daily practice and leads to increased
student achievement.
The FACT system contains performance-based, job-embedded processes to support PTs to improve
their teaching. Through the use of evidence collection and ongoing self-assessment, FACT
documents are designed to focus on the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTPs)
and the Induction and Education Specialist Clear Standards while incorporating the K12 California
Academic Content Standards for Students. The process is described below:
Context for Teaching
In Context for Teaching, PTs learn about their environment and the resources and challenges it
offers. PTs, with their SPs, gather information about their classroom, school, and district, and use
the Conversation Guide: CSDC and/or the Conversation Guide: Education Specialist Optional
Addendum prompts to discuss the implications of their findings. The gist of the conversations are
recorded on these documents with the intention of helping PTs with instructional and management
decision-making, and identifying areas for professional growth. The FACT documents are designed
to prompt levels of graduated depth and complexity. The Collecting and Contextualizing portion of
the Conversation Guides are designed to support the purposeful gathering of information about
students, families, school site, district, and community. In Extending, PTs are asked deeper, more
sophisticated questions about differentiation, embedding new knowledge, and working
collaboratively around the information gathered. Each level offers the opportunity to reflect on how
the information will enable PTs to teach effectively and help their students learn effectively.
Assessment of Teaching and Learning
The Assessment of Teaching and Learning is the bridge between teacher preparation and Induction
programs, comparing the outcomes and processes of each. This assessment is used to build upon the
Education Specialists Transition Plan. PTs consider the knowledge and skills acquired during
teacher preparation (for example results of the Teacher Performance Assessment), their current
context for teaching, and evidence gathered by their SP during an informal classroom observation.
The self-assessment helps PTs identify strengths and areas for growth in concert with the needs of
the employing district. PTs and their SP identify resources and types of support needed to meet PTs
professional growth goals. In addition, Special Education candidates complete an Education
Specialist Needs Assessment to help identify skills to be expanded and advanced content to be
pursued.
Page 26 of 53
4.2 Formative
assessment guides the
work of SPs and
professional
development
providers as well as
promotes and
develops professional
norms of inquiry,
collaboration, datadriven dialogue, and
reflection to improve
student learning.
FACT professional development providers (PDPs) are District BTSA Coordinators or experienced
SPs who have used FACT materials successfully. In addition to FACT experience, Special
Education PDPs are recognized as experienced and successful special educators in their districts.
Trainers work collaboratively with SPs to use the FACT system to focus and direct the PTs growth.
They present the FACT documents as roadmaps to the work of the SPs and PTs. Throughout the
FACT system, PTs are asked to pause and step back from their practice, to thoughtfully examine
what they do, how they do it, and how it affects student learning. The FACT system provides
frequent opportunities for PTs to reflect on activities, capture current thinking, and note possible
changes in their future practice.
PDPs work with SPs to ensure that SPs have the skills to build collaborative relationships with their
PTs. The Sacramento BTSA Consortium uses the tools from Mentoring Matters to assist SPs to
build learning focused relationships. SPs have an option to attend a mentoring skills training to
hone their skills and to further deepen skills through support meetings (SP Updates) where trainers
provide additional and enhanced training. Time is built into each meeting to network in order to
improve practice. SPs use these skills of cognitive coaching, mentoring and modeling to support
PTs growth.
SPs observe PTs as they teach, gathering evidence during an instructional session. Trainers work
with SPs to effectively script lessons and to map those observations onto the CSTPs, Induction and
Clear Standards. Following the observations, they use the FACT documents to conference together,
share observation evidence and other classroom data (e.g. student work samples, lesson plans) to
inform future practice. PTs can work with their Coordinators to observe skilled veterans at work in
Page 27 of 53
The Plan-Teach-Reflect-Apply cycle is the process that underlies all the activities of the FACT
system. As PTs progress through FACT, they follow a delineated cycle of:
Planning for instructional activities;
Teaching a specific lesson, series of lessons, and/or groups of students;
Reflecting upon that teaching experience; and
Applying new knowledge to future practice.
FACT is based upon multiple sets of standards: academic content standards (SPs relate BTSA work
to the PTs grade level and content area standards); California Standards for the Teaching
Profession (SPs assist and observe teachers using the CSTPs as a measure of their practice);
Induction and Education Specialist Clear Program Standards (SPs assist and support in
understanding and demonstrating Standards 5 and 6).
FACT is designed to foster PT reflection by using evidence of teacher and student work. In
collaboration with an SP, PTs self-assess their teaching by utilizing criteria. The Sacramento BTSA
Consortium utilizes the Continuum of Teaching Practice (CTP) as criteria for measuring growth.
The Element Descriptions in the Continuum of Teaching Practice (CTP) are developed for the
purposes of extended preparation and ongoing professional development of beginning teachers, to
be used in concert with the CSTPs, State curriculum frameworks and instructional materials, and
State adopted academic student content and performance standards, and the Formative Assessment
for California Teachers (FACT). Together these three documents have the potential to enhance
teaching practice by providing:
A common language about teaching
Page 28 of 53
PTs regularly reflect upon and assess their current level of practice, through a collaborative dialogue
with an SP, to synthesize their learning and influence future practice. Together, they consider
evidence gathered such as lesson planning, instruction, analysis of student work, and observation of
teaching, and complete a self-assessment that influences decisions regarding changes in
instructional practices and student achievement in their classroom.
4.4 Evidence of
practice includes
multiple measures
such as selfassessment,
observation, analyzing
student work, and
planning and
delivering instruction.
An assessment tool
identifying multiple
levels of teaching
performance is used
as a measure of
teaching practice.
Reflection on
evidence of practice is
a collaborative
process with a
prepared support
provider and/or other
colleagues as
designated by the
induction program.
The Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) process contains several distinct types
of performance-based teaching events, which are designed to support the PT in gaining professional
skills. Each activity is designed to focus on one or more of the CSTP and incorporates the K-12
California Academic Content Standards for Students. Data, collected during FACT, includes
observation, student work, lesson plans, and recorded reflections. Evidence of the CSTP and
induction standards is generated as FACT documents are completed. These evidence pieces provide
the focus for reflective conversations between SPs and PTs and may be used to demonstrate
Induction Standards work. Processes used in this system include:
Observation of Classroom Practice
The SP observes the PT teach and combines information gathered from the observation with other
evidence gathered from the PT's practice (the instructional plan and reflection, and evidence of
student learning) to assess the level of the PT's practice. Following the observation, SPs and PTs
conference together, sharing evidence to inform the PTs future practice.
Examining Student Work
PTs focus on student achievement by examining student work. They analyze student assessments to
guide their planning and instruction using Entry Level Assessment and Summative Assessment of
Student Work documents. PTs learn to differentiate instruction by focusing on specific students and
carefully analyzing their work and the modifications made in instruction.
Reflective Conversations
PTs are asked to pause and step back from their practice to thoughtfully examine what they do, how
they do it, and how it affects student learning. The system provides frequent opportunity, i.e.
through Conversation Guides, for PTs to reflect on FACT activities, capture current thinking, and
note possible changes in their future practice.
Self Assessment
Periodically, PTs reflect and assess their current level of practice through collaborative dialogue
with an SP, to synthesize their learning and influence future practice. The Self Assessment
documents structure that process. PT also have the opportunity to share their self-assessment
reflections with their colleagues.
4.5 Participating
Teachers and Support
Providers collaborate
to develop
professional goals (an
Individual Induction
Plan) based on the
teachers assignment,
identified
developmental needs,
prior preparation and
experiences, including
The Continuum of Teaching Practice (CTP) for both the CSTPs and Induction Standards is an
assessment document utilized in the FACT system by PTs as a measure of teaching practice. The
CTP provides a detailed narrative describing specific actions, attitudes, and understanding needed to
attain each goal. The CTP depicts what each standard looks like in action across a continuum of
developing practice. Coupled with the standards, the CTP provides readers with common concepts,
language, and examples.
The levels inform novices about professional practice. The first level describes practice that is in
need of timely intervention by the SP; the next two levels represent teaching commonly seen in
novices and those working in a new teaching context; and the fourth level is intended to show PTs
what practice that exemplifies the standard looks like. The CTP mirrors the increasingly complex
performances associated with more accomplished teaching.
Page 29 of 53
the Teaching
Performance
Assessment (TPA)
results, when possible.
The Individual
Induction Plan (IIP)
guides the activities to
support growth and
improvement of
professional practice
in at least one content
area of focus.
The Individual Induction Plan (IIP) is a step in the FACT process. Writing the IIP, based on
evidence collected by both the PT and the SP, helps the PT determine how to best focus his or her
efforts. The PT considers practice, school or district priorities, and other challenges to prepare a
plan for professional development in an area they target for growth. The process begins by drafting
or refining a focus question connected to a CSTP and academic content standard, which might be
revisited, altered or changed during the course of the inquiry. In order to gather information related
to the focus question, PTs conduct research that may include professional development offered by
SCOE, the district or other organizations. PTs can choose to attend professional development
provided through the consortium and/or from other sponsors if it is tied to the IIP goal. The IIP is
revisited at the end of the Inquiry as a part of the process of bringing closure to the investigation.
Actual outcomes are used as a catalyst for thinking about the effectiveness of the inquiry results and
next steps for continuous growth.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium uses the information from the teacher preparation Transition
Plan that the participating teacher brings to induction as a tool to identify strengths and possible
areas for growth or need based on their previous classroom experiences and on the input of their
university advisor. This IIP for Professional Development for Clear Education Specialist
Candidates is developed by the candidate and designated representatives of the preparation
program, and shared with the employing district and the Sacramento BTSA Consortium. Whenever
possible, performance data is used from the Teaching Performance Assessments (TPAs) to
determine equivalencies and plan goals.
The IIP is the foundation for the two Inquiries that PTs engage in each year. The IIP guides the
activities to support growth and improvement of professional practice in at least one content area of
focus. The IIP identifies the PT focus based on evidence to be explored during the Inquiry in the
form of a question. In the Sacramento BTSA Consortium, this document is on the server so that
SPs, District Coordinators, SCOE BTSA Directors, and BTSA support staff can monitor the
effectiveness of these posted documents.
SCOE is committed to supporting teachers with varying levels of experience and skill in the
development of a thoughtful plan for professional growth. Support providers work with the
Education Specialist to focus their three IIPs completed as part of FACT. IIPs are uploaded to the
MyBTSA server by the participating teacher and are visible to the support provider, the BTSA
coordinator, and the Sacramento BTSA Consortium staff. The transparency of this document allows
the induction program to focus on meeting individual needs and allowing candidates to be highly
self-directed in documenting competencies and growth.
Please provide specific information about how the IIP is developed with the BTSA Coordinator and
the Sacramento BTSA Consortium staff.
Within 60 days of hire, the Education Specialist develops an IIP for Professional Development for
Clear Education Specialist Candidates, with input from the Induction Director, Education
Specialist Consortium facilitators, and the district Special Education Support Provider keeping in
mind the recommendations in the transition plan and the menu of professional development choices.
This document is designed to expand the PTs knowledge base and can include one or more courses
at a local university. The IIP incorporates a clear action plan, with dates, research, application, and
expected impact on teaching/student achievement. The PTs work in formative assessment is
aligned with the credential authorization and PTs assignment.
The Individual Induction Plan (IIP) follows the Plan-Teach-Reflect-Apply Cycle, the process that
underlies all the activities of the FACT formative assessment system. Using the following steps in
Page 30 of 53
ES 4.4 The
participants work in
formative assessment
must be aligned with
the credential
authorization and
participants teaching
assignment.
The FACT system is designed to support formative processes and directs the collection of evidence
within the teaching assignment (and credential authorization) in the following ways:
Context for Teaching includes a Caseload Profile, Special Education School/District
Information/Resources, Special Education Site Orientation Checklist, and a sample
home/school communication log
Inquiry: Essential Components for Instruction, Assessment Analysis, Focus Student
Profiles, Lesson plans. Observation Data are collected three times during induction.
Self-Assessment: The PT engages in periodic reflection on practice with an emphasis on
the Pedagogy and Equity induction standards.
Conversation Guides that promote interactive dialogue between the support provider and
participating teacher are an ongoing part of the system.
Page 31 of 53
Standard
Program Description
5.1 Participating
teachers grow and
improve in their
ability to reflect upon
and apply the
California Standards
for the Teaching
Profession and the
specific pedagogical
skills for subject
matter instruction
beyond what was
demonstrated for the
preliminary
credential.
When available, Teacher Performance Assessments (TPAs) and/or portfolios from teacher
preparation programs are utilized to assess each PT's level of proficiency in the use of the
California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP). Each PT shares these documents if
available.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium utilizes the Formative Assessment for California Teachers
(FACT) as outlined in the Induction Pacing Guide as its performance based assessment system.
On entry into the program, PTs complete an initial assessment of teaching practice. These
documents provide the PT the opportunity to compare and contrast the outcomes and processes of
their teacher preparation program with those of the induction program. PTs consider their prior
knowledge and skills gained from teacher preparation, their current context for teaching, and
evidence gathered in a classroom observation by a trained SP. This process helps PTs identify
strengths and areas for growth in the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTPs),
which is captured on self-assessment documents that are visited periodically throughout the BTSA
experience.
Each Inquiry cycle within the FACT builds upon preliminary credential knowledge as teachers
move into application, demonstration, and reflection on actual classroom practice. Planning for and
engaging students with disabilities in the core academic curriculum at the grade levels and in the
service delivery modes of their legal assignment is an integrated aspect of what participating
Education Specialist teachers do within FACT. Learning how to differentiate instruction to meet
individual and diverse learning needs is a critical element for ensuring academic success for all
students. SPs and PTs work together to meet the goals outlined in each students Individual
Education Plans (IEPs), adapting and modifying lessons and units that are consistent as appropriate
with the adopted curriculum materials and are differentiated to address the specific academic
learning needs of each student. Participating Education Specialist candidates determine a specific
emphasis for Induction based on their authorization and their employment assignment. Through
Page 32 of 53
each Inquiry cycle they demonstrate how to plan and deliver a comprehensive program of
systematic instruction with accommodations and adaptations in the academic subjects of their
assignment based on their students Individualized Education Programs (IEP). PTs reflect upon
their teaching practice in relation to students Individual Education Plan goals, academic content
standards, as appropriate, and the CSTP. The PT applies these learnings to plan, accommodate and
modify lessons within the context of their teaching assignment demonstrating knowledge of
disabilities and their effects on learning, skills development and behavior.
CSTP
The CSTP are one of the main components of FACT. As part of the FACT process, PTs, in
collaboration with their FACT-trained SPs, assess their practice based on a collection of evidence
that is related to the CSTPs. This process documents their growth over time. The FACT formative
assessment tool that is utilized for this purpose is the Continuum of Teaching Practice (CTP),
which provides a graduated five level description of teacher practice based on all elements of the
CSTP. Utilizing evidence collected by the PT (instruction plans, student work, etc.) as well as SP
observation notes directly related to elements of the CSTPs, the PT self-assesses his/her practice on
the CTP. The program staff provides the CSTPs and Continuum of Teaching Practice (CTP) to all
PTs at mandatory program orientations. The CTP is marked and dated to follow and monitor the
PT's progress on a continuum of professional growth. PTs also develop Individual Induction Plans
(IIPs), which document teaching strengths based on the CSTP, growth needs, outcomes for
students, and steps to implementing the IIPs. The second year in FACT builds upon year one FACT
experiences by allowing the PT to more deeply examine his/her practice. All PTs complete every
FACT Event as documented on MyBTSA.
Pedagogy and Subject Matter Instruction
PTs have numerous and ongoing experiences with the state-adopted content standards and
frameworks, as well as district-adopted materials, and specific pedagogy that expands upon the
Education Specialists expertise in delivering services as identified in the Individual Induction Plan.
District co-sponsors provide standards-based program materials that include grade level content
standards and framework references. District partners offer orientations to the instructional
materials either through publisher or district-sponsored workshops. The State Board of Education
approved materials provide resources that support PTs efforts to build an effective environment
and provide content specific lessons to improve student achievement.
PTs use the Self-AssessmentPedagogy tool to help them understand the Induction Standards and
to identify areas of need. PTs work with their SPs, their BTSA coordinators and with the
Consortium to identify professional learning opportunities provided by the BTSA program, school,
district, county offices of education, or university. The PTs document their professional
development in content areas on MyBTSA during both years.
Sample formative assessment materials (FACT) and reflective writing from these in Year One and
Two are collected electronically on MyBTSA. This serves as evidence of professional growth and
development of the PTs' knowledge and understanding of state-adopted content standards and
performance levels for students, state adopted curriculum frameworks, and adopted texts and
instructional materials at the appropriate grade levels. PTs submit required formative assessment
documentation as evidence of completion of credential requirements as recorded on the Task
Summary Sheet printed from MyBTSA.
Performance Levels
Performance levels are defined by the State Board of Education (SBE) and are categorized on the
CA Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) program as: Advanced, Proficient, Basic, Below
Basic and Far Below Basic. This terminology is directly referred to and utilized in the Inquiry
Cycle as PTs sort and analyze entry-level and summative assessment data (e.g. district benchmark
assessments).
Context for Teaching
Page 33 of 53
PTs complete a CSDC profile in order to learn about their particular teaching environment and
context and engage in thoughtful conversation around pedagogical issues. Included in this data are
language levels of EL students and the identified needs of special populations including the
identification of GATE students. The SP uses the Conversation Guide: Pedagogy to help the PT
understand their classroom, school, district, and community.
5.3 Participating
teachers use and
interpret student
assessment data from
multiple measures for
entry level, progress
monitoring, and
summative
assessments of
student academic
performance to
inform instruction.
Differentiating Instruction
PTs practice preparing a lesson series in the Inquiry Cycle by considering all elements necessary to
ensure that the needs of all students are met. The Essential Components of Instruction tool
structures this process. The PT identifies content standards in student friendly language and
learning goals that will be communicated to the students and families. The PT plans a standardsbased series of lessons. Summative and progress monitoring assessments are selected based on their
purpose and use as well as the methods/criteria that will be used to interpret results. The PT uses
the results of an entry-level assessment to identify knowledge/vocabulary skills needed to ensure
student success during the lesson series. The Education Specialist candidate monitors progress
based on each student's Individual Educational Program at key points to determine whether students
are progressing adequately towards content-achieving standards. The Education Benefits tool helps
with this analysis. Working with their general education counterparts, Education Specialists share
their knowledge of standardized tests to provide timely feedback to students and families regarding
academic and behavioral strengths.
The data from the Entry-level assessment is analyzed by deciding what the assessment results
reveal about what students understand or can do before instruction begins. PTs are asked to decide
what they will do differently for the students who demonstrate proficiency or advanced skills
(benchmark students) and what they will do for the student who is below (strategic) or far below
basic (intervention students). PTs identify what additional support will be needed to address the
Page 34 of 53
needs of these students. PTs in the Sacramento BTSA Consortium complete this assessment task in
the Inquiry Cycle at least once a year.
Education Specialist candidates develop and implement IEP goals to connect general education
curriculum with appropriate materials support and classroom procedures. Assessment data gathered
through Inquiry documents (observation, reflection, and consultation) along with other data support
the identification of students needing specialized instruction including those whose physical or
learning disabilities, or health status require instructional adjustment.
5.5 full range of
learners (e.g.
struggling readers,
students with special
needs, English
learners, speakers of
non-dominant
varieties of English,
and advanced
learners).
5.6 To maximize
learning, participating
teachers create and
maintain wellmanaged classrooms
that foster students
physical, cognitive,
emotional and social
well-being. They
develop safe,
inclusive, and healthy
learning environments
that promote respect,
value differences, and
mediate conflicts
according to state laws
and local protocol.
Page 35 of 53
5.7 Participating
teachers are fluent,
critical users of
technological
resources and use
available technology
to assess, plan, and
deliver instruction so
all students can learn.
Participating teachers
enable students to use
technology to
advance their
learning. Local
district technology
policies are followed
by participating
teachers when
implementing
strategies to
maximize student
learning and
awareness around
privacy, security, and
safety.
Page 36 of 53
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium works with BTSA participants to find, select, and use resources
that build awareness around student privacy, security and safety related to the use of
technological resources. More specifically, BTSA participants are introduced to the SCOE
Bullying Prevention Project and its plethora of web resource links, downloadable documents, and
learning tools for students and parents, including those that target cyber safety and keeping students
safe online. This project provides resources that help districts to focus on a school-based bullying
prevention. The goal is to embed bullying intervention into a comprehensive system of student
learning and supports.
Education Specialists in the Sacramento BTSA Consortium participate in the same processes as
their general education counterparts. Benchmark seminars are conducted quarterly in role-alike
sessions to allow Special Educators a chance to work with others to expand their expertise in
delivering services. During these times, Education Specialists have opportunities to share evidence
collected during the Inquiry process as related to their caseloads and to talk about what they are
learning. Based on their credentials, assignments, and expertise, Education Specialists have
opportunities to talk about the selection of focus students, entry-level assessment, lesson planning,
and observation.
PTs have several opportunities to self assess their professional growth related to pedagogy over
time. During the self-assessment process, the Special Education teachers review the evidence
collected, describe strengths and challenges, and assess their practice in relation to the Induction
Standard related to pedagogy. Candidates are provided reflection planning prompts and possible
sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts. This Self- Assessments: Pedagogy
tool helps document the developing skills and abilities of the teacher.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium provides quarterly Professional Development Saturdays where
current and relevant issues and trends are discussed. Professional development providers may
include teachers, specialists, and university faculty. Evidence-based practices are shared through
scenarios and stories from professional experiences.
ES 5.3 Education
Specialists utilize
advanced level datadriven instruction.
Education Specialists use advanced level data gathering documents from the Context for Teaching
to better understand the students assigned as part of their caseload. A record of IEP dates,
accommodations/modifications, behavioral support strategies, goals, benchmarks, and medical
conditions are collected. This data helps the candidate understand the teaching environment,
identify challenges, and gather information about students.
Research indicates that adult learning is best promoted when issues grow organically from the
classroom rather than from an outside researcher. Induction embedded in the classroom is designed
to be intentional, purposeful and based on evidence. The Inquiry Cycle requires that candidates
examine current research, issues, and trends related to a focus question and apply new learning in
the classroom.
Page 37 of 53
improving their instructional practice based on the CSTP, the Clear Credential Standards, P-12
academic content standards, and specific Individual Education Program (IEP) goals for students.
All formative assessment documents are aligned with the California Standards for the Teaching
Profession and Induction standards with a specific focus for Education Specialist teachers on
social, academic and behavioral interventions, and integration of knowledge concerning current
legal issues related to Special Education.
ES 5.4 Participants
reflect on their
preliminary teacher
preparation & design a
specific emphasis for
their Induction based
on their authorization
& their employment
assignment.
Education Specialists enter the BTSA Induction program with a background based on information
and experience. Candidates are expected to reflect on this base of experience and use their IIP to
plan according to the parameters of their current authorization and assignment. Special Education
candidates are expected to work with their site and district special education directors as well as
their professional learning communities to build on the skills and abilities acquired during teacher
preparation.
The Education Specialist has access to a Menu Of Options that include presentations/resources
from county SELPA directors, district special education coordinators, and presenters affiliated with
professional organizations such as the California Association of Resource Specialists (CARS).
Topics are wide-ranging and may include district special education protocols, site/district
promotional opportunities, information about specialty areas and credential authorizations,
mainstreamed students and their impact on the school community. Education Specialists work with
SCOE and partner leadership to determine which courses are needed and to ensure that the teacher
has access to them.
Page 38 of 53
Sacramento BTSA Consortium Program Summary: Participating teachers (PT) build upon the knowledge acquired
during their college or university teacher preparation program. They submit Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA)
and/or Transition IIP results from colleges or universities when available and use a structured formative process to connect
their prior experience to Induction. During participation in BTSA Induction, PTs build an Induction portfolio containing
evidence that demonstrates their knowledge, skills, and teaching strategies. Multiple opportunities are provided for the PT to
demonstrate his or her ability to teach state adopted academic and performance standards and frameworks in the context of
their teaching assignment and to differentiate instruction to address the needs of students.
As part of the Sacramento BTSA Consortium program, each PT completes the Formative Assessment for California
Teachers (FACT) process. This standard is met as the PT completes FACT. The PT is asked to upload FACT documents to
MyBTSA as evidence of their growing abilities and how this standard is met. By using the system, the support provider (SP),
district coordinator, and BTSA program staff are able to monitor progress.
Evidence from Inquiry Cycle(s), Induction Standards self-assessments and a summative reflection are presented at an end-ofyear event. Trained facilitators from co-sponsors use a Professional Induction Presentation (PIP) Preparation Rubric to
review this evidence and determine if the work has met consortium defined competence. Candidates prepare for the end of
year event by synthesizing their learning. BTSA Directors use the completed Task Summary and the portfolio to make the
decision to recommend a candidate for a clear credential. Recommendations are made using the CTC online system.
Standards
Program Standard 6: Universal Access: Equity for all Students Program Description
6.1 Participating
teachers protect and
support all students
by designing and
implementing
equitable and
inclusive learning
environments. They
maximize academic
achievement for
students from all
ethnic, race, socioeconomic, cultural,
academic, and
linguistic or family
background; gender,
gender identity, and
sexual orientation;
students with
disabilities and
advanced learners;
and students with a
combination of
special instructional
needs.
PTs use the Self-AssessmentEquity tool to help them understand the Induction Standards and to
identify areas of need. PTs work with their SPs, their BTSA coordinators, and with the Consortium
to identify professional learning opportunities provided by the BTSA program, school, district,
county offices of education, or university. The PTs document their professional development in
content areas on MyBTSA during both years. PTs also have online access to the Health and Safety
Resource Guide to ensure that all students are protected and supported.
Protect and Support
PTs are required to protect and support all students. Protecting implies that they create safe learning
environments free from bullying and racial, gender, sexual, and religious harassment. Anti-bullying
resources are available through SCOE and are provided for training as requested by district BTSA
coordinators. Support means that PTs encourage all students to achieve and provide the appropriate
assistance in an education climate that improves academic performance. Based on the students'
developmental and functional level, Education Specialist candidates provide opportunities for
students to engage in academic and social pursuits. Site administrators or their designees are
expected to conduct a site orientation that includes information and the reporting procedures for
sexual harassment and child abuse. This checklist is monitored for completion by SCOE staff and
district coordinators.
Site/district teacher handbooks and annual district required training address sections referring to
behavior regarding gender and sexual orientation. These guidelines serve as a basis for conversation
among school staff members and/or SPs regarding appropriate teacher and student conduct. Student
handbooks provided by the site or district contain information regarding student codes and
harassment. Teachers familiarize themselves with the rules and regulations, and then discuss the
contents of the handbook with their students, making their students cognizant of the expectations and
consequences regarding harassment.
Page 39 of 53
Curriculum Design: PTs engage in structured collaborative conversation with their SPs by
using the Conversation Guide prompts to study Class Profiles. Specifically, PTs identify and
note the background experiences, languages and skills/abilities that are represented by the
students in the classroom. They document how this information can be used to connect with
students and build on their prior knowledge, experience and goals. PTs provide for positive
engagement with other cultures and practices as documented through the Observation
Record Resource Guide: Equity ( SP Users Guide page 35) that includes a review of
equity practices.
Curriculum Content: PTs work with their SPs to ensure that references and/or research
referred to are culturally appropriate; materials and online resources presented should reflect
a diversity of viewpoints and cross-cultural comparisons. Specifically, PTs are asked to use
the Conversation Guide for Equity to talk about and document ways they ensure that the
classroom provides images and positive language that mirrors the population diversity in the
school, county, and state.
Inclusive Teaching Practices: PTs use the documents in FACT Context for Teaching and the
Conversation Guide in the Users Guidebook and Conversation Guide: Education
Specialist Optional Addendum tool, to incorporate developmentally appropriate teaching
techniques and strategies to accommodate the different ways students process information.
They include: activities that promote interaction, collaboration and shared reflection among
students; clear and explicit goals, expectations, traditions and administrative practices;
anticipated issues that might arise from some of the invisible diversity in the class; flexible
approaches to teaching to increase opportunities for students to access supportive resources
such as teaching notes, audiovisual materials, on-line teaching and learning materials;
perception that students are individuals rather than representatives of particular groups;
getting to know their students and to encourage their students to get to know each other;
actively discourage language and behavior which is racist, sexist, homophobic, culturally
offensive, or which demeans people with disabilities. PTs must ensure that damaging
statements do not pass without comment; they allow students to disagree with them or others,
but within guidelines that promote a safe learning atmosphere in the classroom that they are
prepared to respond to student feedback. PTs demonstrate their application of this through the
design and delivery of their lesson series in the Inquiry Cycle and through observations
conducted by the SP throughout the year. Further, PTs are expected to document their
ongoing growth over two years through the Equity Self-Assessment. This documentation is
provided through MyBTSA.
Minimizing Bias
The bias free classroom is achieved through 1) flexible, unbiased curriculum with supporting
materials that enhance diversity (discussed above), 2) teacher attitudes that reflect sensitivity to other
cultures and socio-economic situations, 3) personal style and delivery that provide a role model of
acceptance and belief in the value of cultural diversity. PTs systematically examine their personal
beliefs, values, and behaviors and what impact that they have on their teaching. Issues around equity
and diversity are surfaced and discussed through weekly conversations and at optional Professional
Development Super Saturdays, Benchmark Seminars, district sponsored-workshops, and through
self-assessments.
Page 40 of 53
while using
culturally
responsive
pedagogical
practices.
PTs have an opportunity to examine their beliefs, attitudes, and expectations related to gender and
sexual orientation through the use of an optional tool called Examining Your Beliefs introduced at
the Benchmark Seminars. This tool specifically asks PTs to identify underlying biases that might
affect their ability to work with students in their classroom. While school sites provide policy
information, this tool gives PTs a structured opportunity to examine their personal beliefs, attitudes,
and expectations related to differences. Also, they are encouraged to attend Professional
Development focused on equity and diversity that assists PTs in recognizing and eliminating bias in
the classroom. PTs also use the Conversation Guides in Context for Teaching to talk about what
steps should be taken to eliminate any bias that a PT may bring to the classroom and to reflect, in
collaboration with their SP, on the impact any prejudice may have on students' success.
Culturally Responsive Pedagogical Practices
In Context for Teaching, PTs are asked to identify what district resources support the development of
culturally responsive teaching practice. Culturally responsive instruction is instruction that 1) builds
upon the characteristics, learning styles, strengths, interests, and cultural background/heritage of
students in the classroom, 2) capitalizes on what students know, rather than on what they do not
know when they enter the classroom, and 3) validates and empowers all learners. PTs use the
Essential Components of Instruction in the Inquiry Cycle to ensure that all elements necessary to
design a lesson series meet the needs of all students.
PTs examine how institutional bias may contribute to their teaching context. They use classroom, site
and district data (e.g. CELDT, STAR, and district benchmark tools) to explore academic
achievement gaps between minority students and high achieving students, if present. Activities in the
Context for Teaching assist the PT in recognizing institutional bias. Evidence of this work is
uploaded to the PTs MyBTSA portfolio
6.3 Participating
teachers use a variety
of resources
(including
technology-related
tools, interpreters,
etc.) to collaborate
and communicate
with students,
colleagues, resource
personnel and
families.
Page 41 of 53
will positively acknowledge all students families (two-parent, single parent, and other).
6.4 Participating
teachers provide the
full range of learners
equitable access to
the state-adopted
academic content
standards.
ES 6.1 Education
Specialists
demonstrate
proficiency in the
Teaching Special
Populations portion
of Standard 6
through the context
of practices within
the scope of special
education service
delivery at the site,
district and Special
Education Local
Planning Area
(SELPA) levels and
through
collaboration,
consultation and coteaching with general
education teachers in
the Least Restrictive
Environment
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium ensures that each candidate has access to a Special Education
Resource Guide that helps bridge the transition from teacher preparation to classroom induction.
The FACT processes are conducted within the special education context (collaborative relationships,
Plan-Teach-Reflect-Apply, observation, examining student work, reflective conversation and self
assessment) and are designed to help the candidate document proficiency in the Teaching Special
Populations induction standard.
FACT is responsive to the service delivery model(s) within which the new teacher is assigned to
operate. Quarterly benchmark sessions provide the Education Specialist candidate opportunities to
interact and to share their skills in working with special needs students with the general education
teacher. The Professional Portfolio assembled over the two years is a record of the Education
Specialists growing proficiency and practices within their assigned context.
Standards
Program Standard 6: Universal Access: Equity for all Students: a) Teaching English
Learners
Page 42 of 53
identification,
reclassification and
monitoring processes.
in the Class Profile and the application of this information in the Inquiry EL case study using the
Essential Components for Instruction (what EL data must be considered for students to be
successful), data from their Focus Student Selection (what instructional/behavioral support do
you anticipate this student will need), the Summative Assessment of Student Work (describe
what the student was able to achieve in relation to the academic content standards and the PTs
learning goals) and the Summative Assessment Reflection (what is observed in the students
work, what the student sample tells about the effects of the instructional strategies used, and
what the next step of this student is and why).
Ethical obligation means that PTs protect and support all students by designing and
implementing equitable and inclusive environments. Specifically, this means instructing all
English learners for the purpose of advancing their English proficiency and providing them with
equal access to the core curriculum. Each PT is expected to participate in a site orientation that
includes information about the instructional program for English learners on their site and the
resources in place to support them. If students require support in first language materials, the PT
accesses program materials available at sites to bridge the language barrier.
6(a). 2 Participating
teachers implement
district policies regarding
primary language support
services for students.
Participating teachers
plan instruction for
English Learners based
on the students levels of
proficiency and literacy
in English and primary
language as assessed by
multiple measures such
as state language
proficiency assessments,
state standards
assessments, and local
assessments.
6 (a). 3 Based on
teaching assignment and
the adopted language
program instructional
model(s), participating
teachers implement one
or more of the
components of English
Language Development
(ELD): grade-level
academic language
instruction, ELD by
proficiency level, and/or
content-based ELD.
Based on their teaching assignment, PTs are required to instruct English learners by utilizing
components of English language development (ELD). Education Specialist candidates work with
their general education colleagues to plan lessons for ELD and for academic content based on
cognitive, pedagogical, and individual factors affecting student's language acquisition.
Alternatively, teachers may need to provide ELD scaffolds within their classroom. State board
adopted instructional materials include instruction for these components of ELD. Within training
opportunities provided through the district or consortium, and/or in consultation with ELD
Specialist teachers in the districts, PTs review secondary strategies methods and/or strategies in
the instructional materials, which may be used to deliver instruction to English learners. In
Context for Teaching, PTs discuss and document conversation around the following prompts
with their SPs:
How do these materials support EL students in learning curriculum and content
standards?
What support do I need to assist my EL students?
What support do I need to advance my own teaching practice of English learners?
How will I use the ELD standards to support my EL students in learning the
Page 43 of 53
curriculum?
6 (a). 4 Participating
teachers demonstrate
effective strategies that
support student learning
and lead to mastery of
academic content
standards and objectives.
Participating teachers
also develop language
objectives to addresses
language and literacy
demands inherent in
content area instruction
(e.g., linguistic demands,
language function and
form, audience and
purpose, academic
vocabulary,
comprehension of
multiple oral and written
genres).
6 (a). 5 Participating
teachers demonstrate
skills for managing and
organizing a classroom
with first and secondlanguage learners.
6 (a). 6 Participating
teachers plan instruction
that demonstrates their
understanding of the
importance of students
family and cultural
backgrounds, and
experiences.
6(a).7 Participating
teachers communicate
effectively with parents
and families, taking into
account the linguistic and
cultural backgrounds of
students and their
families.
6 (a). 8 Participating
teachers instruct English
PTs need to demonstrate the ability to modify the instructional delivery to English learners in
order to make grade level subject matter comprehensible and accessible, by using a variety of
systematic teaching strategies that develop concepts and critical thinking. As evidence of this
Page 44 of 53
ability, SPs observe their PTs using an Observation Record Resource Guide: Teaching
English Learners. (Support Providers Users Guide page 35) If no EL students are enrolled in
the teacher's room, the PT collaborates with another teacher where an EL student attends.
PTs track the progress of an English Learner focus student and document the use of English
language development strategies, adopted instructional materials, and strategies for
differentiating instruction for the assessed proficiency levels of English learners.
Within professional development workshops, PTs are provided an opportunity to learn to work
with cultural issues as well as learning styles. Lesson plans from FACT document that PTs are
delivering appropriate instruction, based on the cultural and experiential needs of their language
learners.
In Context for Teaching, PTs discuss and document conversation around the following prompts
with their SPs:
How do I assess English learners to ensure they have access to the core curriculum?
How is information from school and grade level assessments used to plan instruction?
How am I using the electronic learning resources to support instruction and to connect
to the standards?
How many students have access to email and Internet at home? How will I adjust my
teaching to provide for those who do not?
How am I using and adapting lessons to develop students informational literacy and
problem-solving skills?
These discussions are documented in Context for Teaching forms, on the Conversation Guides,
and on the ongoing Self-Assessment: English Learners. SPs and PTs access the EL Resource
Guide from their MyBTSA homepage and use their contents to facilitate conversation around
ELs. Additionally, this resource is used for teachers who have few EL students in their
classrooms. Whether PTs have English Learners or not, they need to demonstrate that they have
the skills to teach them. Thus, PTs are given the following instruction:
Download and read the English Learner (EL) Resource Guide from the MyBTSA
homepage. You can demonstrate your grasp of most of the ideas in this Guide through
your work with your less able learners.
Identify a classroom where there is a population of EL students and observe them. Talk
to the teacher about how they are assessed and how instruction is differentiated for
them based on their proficiency level. Use page 18 and 35 from the English Learner
(EL) Resource Guide for gathering information. Place your notes into your BTSA file.
Focus one of your Inquiries (as either a PT1 or a PT2) on Academic Language (see
page 19-27 in the Resource Guide for ideas to incorporate into your inquiry). Engaging
in this type of Inquiry will successfully demonstrate that you can serve this population.
Standards
Program Standard 6: Universal Access: Equity for all Students: a) Teaching Special
Populations
6 (b). 1 To ensure
academic
achievement for
special populations,
participating teachers
adhere to their legal
and ethical
obligations relative to
Special populations are defined as students who qualify for special education under the 13
qualifying disabilities in the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Students
who have an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) have a set of procedural safeguards and due
process rights that are more protective then those students without an IEP. Additionally, special
populations include Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) students.
Legal and ethical obligations are defined by each PTs teaching assignment and credential. PTs in
the Sacramento BTSA Consortium use the documents in FACT, Context for Teaching to identify
Page 45 of 53
early in the year special need students. Specifically, they note students with medical conditions,
students with IEPs, students with 504 plans, students with previous interventions, and GATE
identified students. With their support provider, they discuss what information is required to
monitor students with IEP and Student Study Team (SST) interventions on an ongoing basis.
6 (b). 2 Participating
teachers
appropriately identify
factors that could
affect the
determination of an
English Learners
language /learning
disability.
Participating teachers
implement district
policies regarding
support services for
special populations.
Statutes, local decisions, and additional documents define the methods for identifying and referring
students for special services, such as via a Student Study Team (SST).
PTs, with their SP, discuss what their legal and ethical responsibilities are in regard to a students
individual education plan (IEP). This conversation is scaffold through Conversation Guides:
Teaching Special Populations.
PTs meet with their site administrator or designee at a site orientation to discuss the legal
requirements of the IEP and to identify the site resources (contact person for the IEP, the Resource
Specialist, school/district psychologist and/or social worker) available to meet the needs of special
populations.
Each of our co-sponsoring partners is expected to provide training to PTs based on district policies
and procedures. The Sacramento BTSA Consortium also ensures that each candidate has access to a
Special Education Resource Guide that helps bridge the transition from learning theory to
classroom application. Topics include:
IDEA overview (legal and ethical obligations, IEP processes, differentiating instruction)
Processes for identifying and referring students (Student Study Teams, IEP services, GATE
eligibility)
6 (b). 3 Participating
teachers
communicate and
collaborate with
special services
personnel to ensure
that instruction and
support services for
special populations
Page 46 of 53
are provided
according to the
students assessed
levels of academic,
behavioral and social
needs.
What personnel, equipment, and assistive technologies are available on site to support my
special needs students learning?
How do I select appropriate resources to meet the changing needs of my special needs
students?
How can I best use the site resources?
PTs demonstrate knowledge by submitting evidence showing they collaborate and cooperate in
SST meetings during the year as needed and appropriate to determine a students eligibility for
referral and assessment; the IEP process follows if needed. Teachers participate depending upon
who is referred from their classes.
6 (b) .4 Based on
assessed student
needs, participating
teachers provide
differentiated
instruction, including
accommodations and
modifications based
on assessed student
needs.
6 (b). 5 Participating
teachers recognize
student strengths and
needs, use positive
behavioral support
strategies, and
employ a strengthsbased approach to
meet the needs of all
Page 47 of 53
students, including
the full range of
special populations.
6 (b) .6 Participating
teachers instruct
special populations
using adopted
standards-aligned
instructional
materials and
resources (e.g.,
varying curriculum
depth and
complexity,
managing Para
educators, using
assistive and other
technologies).
Students that have standards-based IEP goals and instruction are taught the grade-level content
standards. Special Education does not have a separate set of grade-level content standards for
academic areas. The state board adopted instructional materials contain suggestions and resources
for varying curriculum depth and complexity. New teachers are expected to receive some
orientation to these materials (teacher edition, student texts, support material, and enrichment
resources). In Context for Teaching and with their SP, PTs discuss how they are incorporating this
learning into lesson design and delivery. They also discuss what the goals that all parents and
families hold for their children, what are the individual goals and what steps need to be taken to
build a learning team with them.
PTs are also asked to identify the technology resources that accompany their instructional programs.
They talk with their SP about:
How do I use the electronic learning resources to support instruction and to connect to the
standards?
How am I using technology in lessons to increase students understanding of standards?
How am I using and adapting lessons to develop students information literacy and
problem solving skills?
This conversation is documented in Context for Teaching Conversation Guides.
Sacramento BTSA Consortium offers training at the Professional Development Super Saturdays
Page 48 of 53
that targets differentiation and supplements training conducted at the site/district level. Topics may
include:
Creating a climate for learning (safe, nurturing classroom climate that builds community)
Knowing the learner (finding the strengths and weakness of each child)
Assessing/tracking the learner (progress monitoring and effective pre, post, and ongoing
assessment)
Adjusting, compacting, and grouping (examine data, adjust learning, and plan for
grouping)
Instructional strategies for student success (how to teach all learners with best practices:
EL, Special Population, and GATE)
Curriculum resources for the differentiated classroom
Process for identifying and referring students for GATE eligibility
Strategies for integrating GATE students into the academic and social fabric of classroom
instruction.
Use of paraeducators (adults in the classroom who are hired to assist the teacher in
instruction and classroom management)
Documentation of how PTs have applied learnings from PT selected professional development is
documented on MyBTSA.
Page 49 of 53
Program Description
The Individual Induction Plan (IIP) is a step in the FACT process. Writing the IIP, based on
evidence collected by both the PT and the SP, helps the PT determine how to best focus his or her
efforts. The PT considers practice, school or district priorities, and other challenges and prepares
a plan for professional development in an area they target for growth. The process begins by
drafting a focus question connected to a CSTPs and academic content standard, which might be
revisited during the course of the inquiry, altered, or changed. In order to gather information
related to the focus questions, PTs conduct research that may include professional development
offered by SCOE, the district, or other organizations. PTs can choose to attend professional
development provided through the consortium and/or from other sponsors if it is tied to the IIP
goal. The IIP is revisited at the end of the Inquiry as a part of the process of bringing closure to
the investigation. Actual outcomes are used as a catalyst for thinking about the effectiveness of
the inquiry results and next steps for continuous growth.
Education Specialists in SCOEs Consortium work within several Service delivery models.
Within these contexts, Education Specialists self-assess their professional growth related to
advanced pedagogy. During the self-assessment process, the Special Education teachers review
the evidence collected, describe strengths and challenges, and assess their practice in relation to
the Induction Standard related to pedagogy. Candidates are provided reflection planning prompts
and possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts. These SelfAssessments: Pedagogy document the developing skills and abilities of the teacher.
ES 7.2 Each participant
should select
appropriate
professional
development and /or
preparation program
based coursework to
PTs in induction are expected to demonstrate skills beyond what was demonstrated for the
preliminary credential. To avoid duplicate experiences, PTs share strengths and possible areas for
growth or need based on their previous university experiences and with the input of their
university advisor. Special Education candidates new to our program complete a Self Assessment
for Education Specialist candidates in tandem with the Transition Plan prepared during their
preliminary credential preparation to help identify skills to be expanded and advanced content to
be pursued. PTs are also expected to present their reflections from their year one and year two
Page 50 of 53
self-assessments. SCOE realizes that each special education PT holds a unique preliminary
credential (Mild/Mod, Mod/Severe, Early Childhood) and develops specific presentation
guides for each.
An Education Specialist Needs Assessment is completed. Education Specialist credentialing is
complex and multi-layered. This survey assists district and Consortium leaders to provide
appropriate advising and program support that takes job assignment into consideration. The
candidate and SCOE determine professional development activities in partnership with the
district. The goal of supporting the candidate is their development as an effective and reflective
practitioner. An orientation is scheduled with each Special Education candidate and includes
SCOE staff and special education designees if available. At an early meeting with SPs, PTs
discuss an IIP for Professional Development for Clear Education Specialist Candidates.
During that initial discussion SP and PTs also consider the Education Specialist PD Schedule
that is offered by SCOE. Much of the professional development offered by SCOE can be utilized
by special education PTs for use in their inquiry, which is presented later in the school year. PTs
and SPs review teacher preparation experiences to determine prior knowledge, skills and abilities
acquired, and design a growth plan that identifies the coursework, experiences and tasks that
should be completed. The plan is designed for the individual candidate, the specific needs of the
employer, and the current skill level of the candidate.
The intake team offers a Menu of Options (Professional Development Super Saturdays,
university course offerings, school/district/county professional development, etc.) offered to
expand the skills and to enable the candidate to pursue advanced study. This menu is developed
collaboratively with the partners and includes professional development activities identified by
SCOE in partnership with the districts, regional SELPAs, and IHEs to support the candidate as an
effective and reflective practitioner.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium's inquiry process requires candidates to research their focus
questions through such activities as talking with colleagues, observing professional practices,
reading research related to the focus questions, attending workshops/courses, analyzing data such
as student work, exploring the Internet, observation by a SP.
These options, along with topics included in BTSA-sponsored Professional Development Super
Saturdays and school/district offerings are designed to be responsive to the candidates current
teaching assignment and to extend the teacher's current practice.
ES 7.3 In addition,
each Education
Specialist will be
provided with
opportunities to
complete advanced
professional
development in areas
such as: case
management,
advocacy, consultation
and collaboration, coteaching, professional
learning community
participation and
school wide positive
behavior support
relevant to
employment.
The IIP for Professional Development for Clear Education Specialist Candidates provides
candidates a thoughtful and specific emphasis for focused professional development and
identifies from a menu of options specific professional growth goals related to advanced
professional development. The Sacramento BTSA Consortium provides opportunities for
candidates to complete professional development in areas such as: case management, advocacy,
consultation and collaboration, co-teaching, professional learning, community participation, and
school-wide positive behavior support relevant to employment through school/district workshops
and breakout sessions at the BTSA sponsored Professional Development Super Saturdays.
Additionally, the Consortium provides a special education resources document designed to help
teachers make educated and evidence based decisions about their professional development. The
PT and SP use the Resources Guide for Special Populations along with district-specific policies
to inform and guide these ongoing conversations. When appropriate, general education teachers
team with special education teachers to share best practices.
Page 51 of 53
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium challenges the Education Specialist to reflect critically on
their professional practice, extend their understanding, and integrate theory and practice by:
Engaging in weekly conversations with job-alike SPs
Participating in inquiry and reflection through the Formative Assessment for California
Teachers (FACT)
Assembling a professional portfolio of work gathered over time
As indicated in the Education Specialists Individual Induction Plan, each PT has the option of
participating in professional growth opportunities offered by SCOE and a variety of other
partners. During the initial review of TPE/TPA outcomes and as a starting point for writing the
first Individual Induction Plan for Professional Development, the PT is provided with a menu of
professional development options. These options include, but are not limited to, the following:
staff development opportunities in Region 3 through SELPA, our regional partner universities to
further their study in advanced specialty-specific areas and to acquire additional authorizations
relevant to employment, and SCOE Super Saturday BTSA offerings designed for Education
Specialist candidates. Education Specialists also receive support from the district special
education services coordinator or designee who can provide specific support aligned with the
candidates assignment. The induction emphasis grows from candidate need and is grounded in
inquiry and reflective practice.
Education Specialists and SPs also attend quarterly Benchmark Seminars which focus on specific
topics related to the Inquiry focus and, when possible, their identified area of specialization. The
seminars are designed to build upon the PTs understanding of how to use Inquiry-based evidence
to guide planning and instruction based on students identified IEP goals. The SP and PT
personalize each Inquiry through the writing of the Individual Induction Plan and the Inquiry
Action Plan thus ensuring a depth of experience that challenges the Education Specialist within
his/her area of specialization, authorization, and employment assignment.
PTs in the Consortium complete IIPs that contain Action Plans tied to documented need.
Candidates must document on their uploaded IIPs how they address their Inquiry questions
through methods such as Internet research, coursework, articles, observations, and conversations
with mentors. Education Specialists demonstrate that they use data-driven instruction through
lesson planning, analysis of student work, observation records, and notes from conversations.
Finally all PTs will present reflections from self-assessments and PTs clearing their level-two
credential will present their level 2 competencies.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium offer quarterly Education Specialist Support Saturdays
facilitated by Special Education leaders in the areas of mild/moderate, moderate/severe, ECSE,
and DH. Agendas for these sessions are built around questions and topics important for special
educators professional growth. Current articles and research related to the focusing questions are
shared at each session along with information regarding legal issues as evidenced by handouts
kept on file in the BTSA office. Also, all Education Specialist candidates compete a Self
Assessment that includes a prompt related to Current Research and Trends. Specifically,
candidates reflect on the research shared through their district and through Saturday Support
sessions and share how they integrate current research into their practice. This information is
documented on the Self-Assessment for Education Specialist Clear candidates.
Page 52 of 53
Page 53 of 53
Year 1
PT Induction Course Content
YEAR 1 PT TASKS
Induction Advisement
Credential Roles and
Responsibilities
Registration (MyBTSA
and State Consent
Form)
Understand Completion
Policy
Orientation
Introduction to the
Intake IIP
WHAT NOW
WELCOME to the Sacramento County Office of Education (SCOE) Induction Program! One way that
we support you is through an individual and secured Web record called MyBTSA (www. MyBTSA.org),
which spells out your induction path, provides a portal to your online induction portfolio, and keeps a
record of your task status.
Weekly Conversations
You and your Support Provider (SP) will speak weekly. These conversations must be logged into
MyBTSA and approved by your SP. Do this in a timely fashion. You can conduct conversations via
telephone, computer, or face to face. Up to 12 hours of grade /department level meeting time can be
tracked and approved by your SP.
Benchmark Seminars
All PTs are required to attend 4 Benchmark Seminars during the 2014-2015 school year. All
benchmark sessions are held at SCOE. You will be assigned to a cohort based on your teaching
assignment and will be assigned dates to attend. Be sure to calendar these dates early so that you are
available on those dates. SCOE will record attendance for this task.
Professional Development
You are required to complete twenty-four (24) hours of professional development for the 2014-2015
BTSA year. You have several options for completing your PD. Your SP will assist you in selecting the
appropriate PD opportunities. Keep in mind that you must engage in PD activities that are related to
and referenced in your action plan on your IIP and are relevant to your focus question.
To receive credit, you must enter (log) all PD activities onto MyBTSA and present a verification of
attendance (e.g. signed Certificate of Attendance, signed agenda, observation notes, summary of
readings, etc). These verifications will be submitted at the Professional Induction Presentation (PIP).
o Site Orientation
Checklist
Initial Observation
o KWO Chart
o Post Observation
Reflection
This first benchmark asks you to focus on your students, your classroom, your site, administration, and
all the support services available to you. This process will help you be knowledgeable about your
students and how you can address their individual learning needs.
You will also plan and teach a lesson that your SP will informally observe. Feedback from this lesson
will help you determine your level of practice related to the CSTPs.
BTSA templates are available on MyBTSA or you may want to substitute your own when appropriate.
You may also want to use photos or diagrams, or information and directories that you may find in your
site information materials.
Information to gather for this Benchmark includes:
A class profile (Look at the student enrollment information that may be provided through a
district information system and ask your students for information)
The layout of your instructional environment and the site areas you use for teaching (make
a diagram or take photos)
School and District Information/Resources (check the directories in your site binder for
administrative, curriculum, technology, special education, and other services)
Home/School Communication Log (you may want to design your own system for logging
conversations/emails)
Site Orientation Checklist (so that you have all the information you need to get started on a
great teaching year)
Informal Observation:
Fill out the K-W-O Chart (What I Know, What I Want to know, What I want you to Observe) and share it
with your SP.
Plan a lesson and schedule an observation with your SP. As you plan, consider the learning needs of
all students. What is the actual EVIDENCE your SP will observe to show the quality of your teaching?
Your SP will do an objective observation that will help you gain valuable insights about your teaching
and identify methods you may want to change or strengthen.
Complete a Post-Observation Reflection. Get ready to grow as a professional and to ask for support
when you need it.
Benchmark 1 Focus
OCTOBER
Benchmark Seminar 2 Focus
NOVEMBER
Continuum of Teaching
Practice
Intake IIP
You will also complete an INTAKE IIP focused on Standard 2 with your SP. This will serve as a
starting place when you formally begin the INQUIRY CYCLE in Benchmark 3. Your SP will complete
this with you and walk you through the process.
Self Assessments
(Uploaded)
o
Initial: Pedagogy
o
Initial: Equity
Benchmark 2 explores the Pedagogy (the art and science of teaching), and Equity (creating a fair,
impartial, and just environment for your students) of your chosen profession. It asks you to assess
yourself and systematically focus on developing as a professional educator. You will do two initial
reflections. One will be on pedagogy and one on equity. Your reflections should be thoughtful and
professionally written.
Your SP will offer support, create challenges, and facilitate a professional vision that will help you develop
sound educational practices and high expectations.
Embrace the challenges. Focus on the evidence collected through observation and reflection with your
SP. Teaching is a long and collaborative journey.
Information to gather for this Benchmark includes:
When you have finished all of the above you will review the Continuum of Teaching Practice.
Although you will review all six standards and elements, you will focus your attention on Standard
2, (Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning). Evaluate yourself on
each of the elements of the California Standards for the Teaching Profession. Highlight or underline a
column for each of the seven elements as a self-evaluation of your current level of teaching. For each
page you will want to cite and describe the evidence that demonstrates each CSTP.
Essential
Components for
Instruction
Entry Level
Assessment
Focus Student
Selection
Lesson Plan
Observation
Summative
Assessment of
Student Work
Continuum of Teaching
Practice
Entry-Level Assessment
Observation Scripting
Self Assessments
(Uploaded)
o
Final: Pedagogy
o
Final: Equity
Self Assessment
Share
Statewide Survey
Youve come a long way during Year 1 in your understanding of the teaching profession and your
experiences with your students and colleagues. Now it is time to revisit your initial selfassessments, review all collected evidence (Context for Teaching, Inquiry cycle, observations,
and student work), and describe your strengths and challenges as you complete your final selfassessment.
Take a good long look at your experiences this year and your growing skills and knowledge as
you look back at your Initial Assessments, and use that as a basis for your Final Assessments.
Your SP can support you in these reflections. Look at the evidence to support Pedagogy and
reflect on how you helped your students meet or exceed grade level standards. Think about your
English Learners and Special Population students. How did your teaching practices support
these students and enable them to advance in their learning? How did you focus on Equity for all
students?
Information to gather for this Benchmark includes:
Statewide Survey: You will receive your login information and you must complete the required
statewide survey by the assigned due date which will be sometime in May. This will be an online
survey that reflects your first year experience with induction.
Equity Inquiry
Presentation
Portfolio Submission
(Uploaded)
o
Complete Inquiry
Cycle: Equity
o
Self-Assessments
Pedagogy
Equity
o
Reflective Summary
of Teaching Practice
Notes:
Its now time for the Summative Event. This is an opportunity for you to share with other educators
your key insights about teaching based on evidence collected in your Professional Portfolio. Youve
worked hard at your profession and you have the evidence to prove it.
Check your Task Status Report to make certain all your tasks have been uploaded and approved on
MyBTSA.
Complete a Reflective Summary of Teaching Practice. Consider the evidence you have collected
during the year and identify teaching practices that had the greatest effect on student learning. Meet
with your SP to discuss your professional growth over the past year. Write your reflections based on
the information you have gathered from the Inquiry process and the evidence you will showcase in
your Professional Portfolio. Your comments need evidence.
Capture your reflections, bundle up your Professional Portfolio, and congratulate yourself on your
accomplishments during BTSA Year 1.
You will have an online portfolio of all the evidence you have uploaded onto MyBTSA as well as a
hard copy portfolio of the following items:
Verifications of PD Completion
You will bring the items above to your Professional Induction Presentation held at the Sacramento
County Office of Education.
At the Professional Induction Presentation you will have 15 20 minutes to present your Inquiry Unit
and share what you have learned about your focus students, yourself, and the teaching profession
during your first year of BTSA. You will leave the hard copy portfolio with SCOE at this time for
review.
YEAR 2 PT TASKS
Induction Advisement
o Credential Roles and
Responsibilities
o Update information on
MyBTSA
Orientation
o Understand Completion
Policy
WHAT NOW
WELCOME to the Sacramento County Office of Education (SCOE) Induction Program! You have
been issued an individual web record through MyBTSA, (www. MyBTSA.org), which spells out your
induction path, provides a portal to your online induction portfolio, and keeps a record of your task
status.
Weekly Conversations
You and your Support Provider (SP) will connect weekly via telephone, computer, or face to face.
These conversations must be logged into MyBTSA and approved by your SP. Do this in a timely
fashion. Up to 12 hours of grade/department level meeting time can be logged as hours.
Benchmark Seminars
All PTs are required to attend 4 Benchmark Seminars held at SCOE. You will be assigned to a cohort
based on your teaching assignment and will be assigned dates to attend. Be sure to calendar these
dates early so that you are available on those dates. SCOE will record attendance for this task.
Professional Development
You are required to complete twenty-four (24) hours of professional development tied to your IIP
Focus questions. Your SP will assist you in selecting the appropriate PD options and opportunities.
Keep in mind that you must engage in PD activities that are related to and referenced in your action
plan on your IIP and are relevant to your focus question.
To receive credit, you must enter (log) all PD activities onto MyBTSA and present a verification of
attendance (e.g. signed Certificate of Attendance, signed agenda, observation notes, summary of
readings, etc). These verifications will be submitted at the Professional Induction Presentation (PIP).
Benchmark Seminar 1
OCTOBER
o Site Orientation
Checklist
Continuum of Teaching
Practice
Self-Assessments
(Will be Uploaded)
o Initial: Pedagogy, Yr. 2
o Initial: Special
Populations
o Initial: English
Learners
This first benchmark asks you to revisit your context for teaching (your students, your instructional
environment, your site, administration, and all the support services available to you). This process will
help you learn about your students and how you can address their individual learning needs.
BTSA templates are available on MyBTSA or you can substitute your own when appropriate. You
may also want to use photos or diagrams, or information and directories that you may find in your site
information materials.
Information to gather for this Benchmark includes:
A class profile (Look at the student enrollment information that may be provided through a
district information system and ask your students for information)
The layout of your instructional environment and the site areas you use for teaching (make a
diagram or take photos)
School and District Information/Resources (check the directories in your site binder for
administrative, curriculum, technology, special education and other services)
Home/School Communication Log (you may want to design your own system for logging
conversations/emails)
Site Orientation Checklist (so that you have all the information you need to get started on a
great teaching year)
Continuum of Teaching Practice
You will also review your Continuum of Teaching Practice to help you determine your level of practice
related to the CSTPs. Evaluate yourself on each of the elements of the California Standards for the
Teaching Profession. Highlight or underline a column for each of the seven elements as a selfevaluation of your current level of teaching. For each page you will want to cite and describe the
evidence that demonstrates each CSTP.
Self Assessments
You will also complete three self-assessments: Pedagogy (the art and science of teaching); Special
Populations (serving the full range of students: students identified for special education, students
with disabilities, advanced learners, and students with a combination of special instructional needs);
and English Learners (differentiating instruction based on language proficiency). It asks you to
assess yourself and systematically focus on developing as a professional educator. You will do three
initial reflections that should be thoughtful and professionally written.
Benchmark Seminar 2
NOVEMBER
Inquiry Cycle #1
(Will be uploaded)
o IIP
o Essential Components
for Instruction
o Entry Level
Assessment
o Focus Student
Selection
o Lesson Plan
o Observation
o Summative
Assessment of
Student Work
Continuum of Teaching
Practice
Inquiry Cycle #1
An Inquiry Cycle is all about developing your skill as a teacher using your Individual Induction Plan
(IIP). You will choose a focus question based on your self-assessments and develop an action plan
to lead you on your inquiry journey. Your question should be specific and should reflect what you
want to know about your teaching as it relates to the standards of your profession.
Make it
important to your students and to your growth as a teacher. In your action plan you must engage in a
minimum of two types of professional development activities that are directly related to your Inquiry
Focus question.
Schedule a pre-lesson conference with your SP and review your IIP and Essential Components for
Instruction to be certain you are ready for your lesson planning. Plan a lesson series, and assess
your students. Select your focus students: 1) Special Populationscan include a GATE student), 2)
an English learner, and 3) one who isnt in one of the other two categories. During the series, your SP
will formally observe at least one lesson. Collect student work and assess the success of your
lessons based on your evaluation of their work. Reflect on the process and evaluate the inquiry cycle
and your growth as a teacher. This is your opportunity to PLAN, TEACH, REFLECT, And APPLY.
Benchmark 4
MARCH
Benchmark Seminar 3
JANUARY
Revisit the Continuum of Teaching Practice to help determine your proficiency related to the CSTPs.
Inquiry Cycle #2
(Will be Uploaded)
o IIP
o Essential Components
for Instruction
o Entry Level
Assessment
o Focus Student
Selection
o Lesson Plan
o Observation
o Summative
Assessment of
Student Work
Continuum of Teaching
Practice
Inquiry Cycle #2
Self-Assessments
(Will be Uploaded)
o Final: Pedagogy, Yr. 2
o Final: Sp. Populations
o Final: English Learners
Now it is time to revisit your initial self-assessments, review all collected evidence (Context for
Teaching, Inquiry cycles, observations, and student work), and describe your strengths and challenges.
Inquiry #1 Presentation
and Paper Submission
End-of-Year PIP
MAY
Statewide Survey
By the third Inquiry Cycle, you should be comfortable with the process and have internalized this
process into your everyday work. By this point, you should clearly understand how this process is
developing your skill as a teacher using your Individual Induction Plan (IIP). To accomplish this you will
focus on what you need to know and do based on your self-assessments.
Complete an IIP and write a meaningful and thoughtful focus question. Develop an action plan to lead
you on your inquiry journey and make explicit links between the PD and your question. Have a prelesson conference with your SP and review your IIP and Essential Components for Instruction. Plan a
lesson series, assess your students prior to the start of the series of lesson, select focus students, and
teach the series. Your SP will formally observe at least one lesson in the series. Collect student work
from the entire series and assess the success of your lessons based on your evaluation of their work.
Reflect on the process and finally you will evaluate the inquiry cycle and your growth as a teacher. This
is your opportunity to PLAN, TEACH, REFLECT, and APPLY.
You will also revisit your Continuum of Teaching Practice to help you determine your level of practice
related to the CSTPs
Take a good long look at your experiences this year and your growing skills and knowledge and use
that as a basis for your Final Assessments. Your SP can support you in these reflections. Do not
forget to cite and describe the evidence collected through the year as you reflect.
Statewide Survey: You will receive your login information and you must complete the required
statewide survey by the assigned due date which will be sometime in May. This will be an online
survey that reflects your experience with induction.
Inquiry #2 Presentation
and Paper Submission
During the Professional Induction Presentation (PIP), you will share with other educators your key
insights about teaching based on evidence collected in your Professional Portfolio.
Year 2 Portfolio
Submission (Uploaded)
o Complete Inquiry Cycle
#2
o Self-Assessments
o Reflective Summary of
Teaching Practice
Check your Task Status Report to make certain all your tasks have been uploaded and approved on
MyBTSA. Complete a Reflective Summary of Teaching Practice. Consider the evidence you have
collected during the year and meet with your SP to discuss your professional growth over the past year.
Write your reflections based on the information you have gathered from the Inquiry process and the
evidence you will showcase in your Professional Portfolio. Your comments need evidence.
Upload all required documents onto MyBTSA and assemble a hard copy portfolio of the following:
Self-Assessments (Pedagogy, Special Populations, EL, and Ed. Specialist Clear if appropriate)
Verifications of PD Completion
You will have 15 20 minutes to present your Inquiry Unit and share what you have learned about your
focus students, yourself, and the teaching profession. SCOE will collect a hard copy of your portfolio.
Orientation
YEAR 1 PT TASKS
Induction Advisement
Credential Roles and Responsibilities
Benchmark Seminar 1
OCTOBER
Benchmark Seminar 2
NOVEMBER
Benchmark Seminar 3
JANUARY
o Instructional Environment
o School and District Information/Resources
o Instructional Environment
o School and District Information/Resources
Benchmark
Seminar 4
MARCH
YEAR 2 PT TASKS
Induction Advisement
Credential Roles and Responsibilities
Initial: Equity
o Lesson Plan
o Lesson Plan
o Observation
o Summative Assessment of Student Work
o Observation
o Summative Assessment of Student Work
Final: Equity
Statewide Survey
End-of-Year PIP
MAY
Statewide Survey
Equity Inquiry Presentation
Documentation Review:
______________________________
IHE Representative Signature/Date
_________________________
Candidate Signature/Date
______________________
____________________________
Step 3: The candidate is responsible for completion of this document and submission of one copy each to the IHE representative, Induction director, and district support
provider for use in the Education Specialist Induction Program.
Step 2 Directions: Reflect on evidence gathered during your teacher preparation program and identify one to four tentative professional growth goals.
Step 1 Directions: Based on evidence gathered during your teacher preparation program, use the first two columns to describe your strength(s) in relation to the following.
Field Experience
Implications
TPE Domain
(Student Teaching, Intern program, Out-of-State, Portfolio) (To be completed with your Induction Support Provider)
A: Making Subject Matter Comprehensible to
Students
Support Provider:
Induction Program:
District:
University:
Credential Received:
Candidate Name:
Transition Document
Support Provider
District/ School
2.6 Employing classroom routines, procedures, norms, and supports for positive
behavior to ensure a climate in which all students can learn.
PLAN
ACTION PLAN: Examining research related to my focus question and applying new learning in my classroom
5. Date of research
6. Identify which resources (more then one) you will use for your research and describe below.
Exploration of new strategies/techniques
Professional reading
Other
PLAN/TEACH
Workshop or conference
9A. As a result of the inquiry process, describe the impact on instructional/classroom practices and student achievement? (list specific evidence)
REFLECT
REFLECTION/APPLICATION
9B. Share your learning about student development, instructional practices, academic content, and/or yourself as a teacher.
APPLY
Content
Area
Teaching
Assignment
REFLECTION/APPLICATION
6.
REFLECT
b. Share your learning about student development, instructional practice, academic content, and/or yourself as a teacher.
a. What was the impact on instructional practices and student achievement? (list specific evidence)
PLAN/TEACH
9.
8.
School
ACTION PLAN: Examining research related to my focus question and applying new learning in my instructional setting
upon the scope and depth of study in specific content areas, as well as expertise in
performing specialized roles and/or responsibilities.
knowledge of and ability to interpret, apply and disseminate current and emerging
research, theory, legislation, policy and practice.
4. Date of
research
District
Support
Provider
Participating
Teacher
Date:
PLAN
APPLY
IIP #
Date:
Support Provider
District
Teaching
Assignment
Content Area
School
PLAN
ACTION PLAN: Examining research related to my focus question and applying new learning in my classroom
5. Date of research
6. Identify which resources (more then one) you will use for your research and describe below
Workshop or conference
Professional reading
Other
7.
PLAN/TEACH
REFLECTION/APPLICATION
9B. Share your learning about student development, instructional practices, academic content, and/or yourself as a teacher.
REFLECT
9A. As a result of the inquiry process, describe the impact on instructional/classroom practices and student achievement? (list specific
evidence)
10. Describe how you will apply new learning to future practice.
APPLY
Direct Services
To Participating Teachers
And Support Providers
IHE Representatives
BTSA Statewide
Program
Design Team
Program Analyst
Dawn McCarron
BTSA Coordinators
Executive Director
Sacramento County
Superintendent of Schools
David Gordon
Indirect Services
To Participating Teachers
And Support Providers
SCOE-ISS Representative
BTSA Coordinators
District Advisors
IHE Representative
Retired BTSA Administrators
Advisory Council
Teacher may
participate in
Induction
Yes
Yes *
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes *
Yes *
Yes *
Yes *
Yes *
Yes *
Yes *
Depends 1
No
Yes, if an approved
Induction Program will
accept the candidate
and a plan for the
individual is
developed.
The plan must provide
for the range of
induction experiences
and opportunities
including experiences
with children to
demonstrate
knowledge and skills
required by the
program standards.
No
?2
No
Yes *
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Employer is defined as a California public school, any school that is sponsored by a private California K-12 school,
non-public, non-sectarian school or agency, charter school, or a school operated under the direction of a California
state agency. Employer must complete, and superintendent or designee, sign the CL 855 Induction Program Verification of Unavailability of a Commission-Approved Program form.
The employing agency makes this decision. Factors to consider include the length of the assignment and the
individuals employee status with the agency.
If the preschool is run by the school district AND the teachers are on the regular teacher salary schedule, then Yes
to the employer signing the CL 855 letter. Otherwise No.
kpolster@ctc.ca.gov
SP
2014-15
Optional
CSUS Units
Weekly Conversations
Log 40 hours of communication time with your Support Provider and your school team. Hours can include faceto-face meetings, phone calls, emails, and grade/department meetings (up to 12 hours).
SCOE Benchmarks
Register on My BTSA and attend four workshops, held at the Sacramento County Office of Education from
4-6 p.m. These Benchmark workshops will reinforce your work with your students and keep you updated on
your credential work.
Professional Development (PD)
Complete and document 24 hours of PD that aligns with your district goals and your professional growth goal
using the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTPs). Examples include workshops, trainings,
online offerings, formal observation of an experienced teacher, etc.
Professional Induction Presentation (PIP)
In the spring, present your research (Inquiry) to a fellow credential candidate using a prescribed protocol and
upload your presentation notes to My BTSA.
BTSA provides many resources to help you complete your requirements, including: Continuum of
Teaching Practice, California Standards for the Teaching Profession, and My BTSA.
PT
ES
Dawn McCarron
Program Analyst
(916) 228-2496
dmccarron@scoe.net
Fax: 916-228-3921
Website: www.btsasacramento.org
Facebook Page:
www.facebook.com/btsasacramento.org
Prior teaching experience as a full-time Teacher of Record. Please check all that apply:
_____
_____
_____
II.
Evidence of exceptional teaching practice during prior professional experience. Attach your
evidence/documentation such as teacher performance evaluations completed in the prior 18
months.
III.
On a separate piece(s) of paper, introduce yourself and provide a clear rationale for inclusion
in this program. Your rational should reflect your exemplary practice, attitudes,
professionalism, and commitment to the teaching profession. Also provide answers to the
following questions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
IV.
The CSTP (CA Standards for the Teaching Profession) are a core component of the BTSA Induction Program. What
knowledge do you have of these standards?
Discuss a standards-based lesson you have developed and delivered. What is the rationale for the lesson and your choices
of delivery? How does this lesson fit into long-term planning? (e.g., Show knowledge of curriculum mapping, district,
site, department or grade- level long-term planning; show your standards-based lesson plan including Student Content
Standard(s), student achievement goals, standards-based assessment(s), instructional strategies, student activities, and
materials utilized.
Discuss your analysis of student work. From data analysis, what specifically did you learn about student academic
performance (class as a whole and/or focus students)? What have you learned about your own teaching practice from the
analysis? (e.g., Discuss ideas for your own next steps in using student work to guide instruction; show use of student work
for progress monitoring/ checking for understanding; show evidence of planning intervention, remediation or extension for
focus students based on the data,)
Discuss how you differentiate instruction for an English Language Learner OR a student with an IEP. Discuss how your
instructional strategies and student activities differed for this student(s) and why you chose these strategies and activities.
A classroom observation completed by your site administrator or your district coordinator that
provides evidence of high performing teaching practice related to the CSTPs.
V.
________________________________
Signature of Applicant
______
Date
Date______
Administrator
Name________________________________________________________
Administrator
Signature_____________________________________________________
Comments:
This candidate ______does qualify ______ does not qualify for the ECO based on the stated
qualifications.
Approved by: _____________________________________________________
Tasks
SarahBullock
UserProfile
CredentialPath
Tasks
Events
WeeklyConversations
ProfessionalDevelopment
Impersonate
20142015TaskOverview
ParticipantStatus:Active(20142015)
Belowisanoverviewof20142015tasksassignedtoSarahBullock.Hoveroverastatusiconfor
moreinformation.Whereadocumenthasbeenuploaded,clickthelinkintheViewDocuments
columntoopeninanewbrowserwindowortab.
SCOEEvents
Task
ViewDocument
Target
OrientationMeeting
9/21/2014
BenchmarkSeminars
BenchmarkSeminar#1
BenchmarkSeminar#2
BenchmarkSeminar#3
BenchmarkSeminar#4
10/31/2014
12/24/2014
3/3/2015
4/30/2015
ProfessionalInductionPresentation(PIP)
5/27/2015
Status
TeachingEnvironment
Task
ViewDocument
Target
ContextforTeachingYear1
ClassProfile
InstructionalEnvironment
SchoolandDistrictInformation/Resources
Home/SchoolCommunication
Site/AssignmentOrientationChecklist
CommunityInformation
ContinuumofTeachingPracticeFall
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
InitialObservation
KWOChart
PostObservationReflection
SelfAssessments
Status
10/1/2014
11/1/2014
SelfAssessments
Task
Pedagogy
PedagogySelfAssessment
Equity
EquitySelfAssessment
ViewDocument
Target
Status
notuploaded
1/1/2015
notuploaded
1/1/2015
ViewDocument
Target
Inquiries
Task
InquiryEquity
IndividualInductionPlan(IIP)
EssentialComponentsforInstruction
EntryLevelAssessmentPart1andPart2
FocusStudentSelection
LessonPlanTemplateforObservation
InquiryObservationRecordPart1andPart2
AnalysisofStudentWork
SummativeAssessmentPart1andPart2
ContinuumofTeachingPracticeSurveySpring
Status
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
5/1/2015
Task
ViewDocument
Target
ProfessionalDevelopment
6/1/2015
Task
ViewDocument
Target
WeeklyConversations
5/1/2015
ProfessionalDevelopment
Status
WeeklyConversations
SurveysandEvaluations
Status
Task
ViewDocument
Target
Status
RolesandResponsibilities
10/1/2014
Task
ViewDocument
Target
CulminatingQuestionsandReflectionsGuide
notuploaded
6/1/2015
EndofYearPresentationScriptingNotes
notuploaded
6/15/2015
EndofYearPreparation
Status
returntothetop
Tasks
NicholRogers
UserProfile
CredentialPath
Tasks
Events
WeeklyConversations
ProfessionalDevelopment
Impersonate
20142015TaskOverview
ParticipantStatus:Active(20142015)
Belowisanoverviewof20142015tasksassignedtoNicholRogers.Hoveroverastatusiconfor
moreinformation.Whereadocumenthasbeenuploaded,clickthelinkintheViewDocuments
columntoopeninanewbrowserwindowortab.Viewfulltasklistsfromotheryears: 2013
2014
SCOEEvents
Task
ViewDocument
Target
OrientationMeeting
9/21/2014
BenchmarkSeminars
BenchmarkSeminar#1
BenchmarkSeminar#2
BenchmarkSeminar#3
BenchmarkSeminar#4
10/31/2014
12/24/2014
3/3/2015
4/30/2015
EducationSpecialistSupportSaturdays
EducationSpecialistSupportSaturday#1
EducationSpecialistSupportSaturday#2
EducationSpecialistSupportSaturday#3
EducationSpecialistSupportSaturday#4
10/25/2014
11/22/2014
1/24/2015
3/28/2015
ProfessionalInductionPresentation(PIP)
5/27/2015
Status
TeachingEnvironment
Task
ContextforTeachingYear2
ClassProfile
InstructionalEnvironment
SchoolandDistrictInformation/Resources
Home/SchoolCommunication
Site/AssignmentOrientationChecklist
CommunityInformation
ContinuumofTeachingPracticeFall
ViewDocument
Target
Status
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
12/1/2014
SelfAssessments
Task
Pedagogy
PedagogySelfAssessment
SpecialPopulations
SpecialPopulationsSelfAssessment
EnglishLearners
EnglishLearnersSelfAssessment
ViewDocument
Target
Status
notuploaded
1/1/2015
notuploaded
1/1/2015
notuploaded
1/1/2015
ViewDocument
Target
Inquiries
Task
Inquiry#1
IndividualInductionPlan(IIP)
EssentialComponentsforInstruction
EntryLevelAssessmentPart1andPart2
FocusStudentSelection
LessonPlanTemplateforObservation
InquiryObservationRecordPart1andPart2
AnalysisofStudentWork
SummativeAssessmentPart1andPart2
ContinuumofTeachingPracticeSurveyWinter
Inquiry#2
IndividualInductionPlan(IIP)
EssentialComponentsforInstruction
EntryLevelAssessmentPart1andPart2
FocusStudentSelection
LessonPlanTemplateforObservation
InquiryObservationRecordPart1andPart2
AnalysisofStudentWork
SummativeAssessmentPart1andPart2
ContinuumofTeachingPracticeSurveySpring
Level2Requirements
Status
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
2/1/2015
2/1/2015
2/1/2015
2/1/2015
2/1/2015
2/1/2015
2/1/2015
2/1/2015
2/1/2015
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
notuploaded
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
4/1/2015
Level2Requirements
Task
ViewDocument
Target
Status
CPRRequirement
notuploaded
5/1/2015
HealthRequirement
notuploaded
5/1/2015
TechnologyRequirement
notuploaded
5/1/2015
DocumentationofLevel2StandardsCompetency
Requirements
notuploaded
5/1/2015
Task
ViewDocument
Target
ProfessionalDevelopment
6/1/2015
Task
ViewDocument
Target
WeeklyConversations
5/1/2015
ProfessionalDevelopment
Status
WeeklyConversations
Status
SurveysandEvaluations
Task
ViewDocument
Target
Status
RolesandResponsibilities
10/1/2014
Task
ViewDocument
Target
CulminatingQuestionsandReflectionsGuide
notuploaded
6/1/2015
EndofYearPresentationScriptingNotes
notuploaded
6/15/2015
EndofYearPreparation
Status
BTSATeacherInduction2014
Task/HourRequirement
ParticipatingTeacherHours
Events
Orientation
Benchmarks
PIP
WeeklyConversations
2
8
4
40
Observation
ProfessionalDevelopment
24
Survey/Evaluation
Total
90
SupportProviderHours
Events
Benchmarks
Pip
Support
ContextforTeaching
SelfAssessments
Inquiry(ies)
ContinuumofTeaching
Practice
ProfessionalDevelopment
Observation
SPUpdate
FACTtraining(ONEYEAR
ONLY)
Survey/Evaluation
Total
8
2
40
2
(30)
60
Weekly Conversation
Support Provider and Participating Teacher
PARTICIPATING TEACHER
SUPPORT PROVIDER
TODAYS DATE
Identify your key learnings from the last time you met together until now.
Questions I have? What are my next steps? What action will I take?
Save this document to your personal computer. Print a copy and place in your portfolio (CFASST Box).
Resources
Add a New Resource
Title
Independent Inquiry
13-14 PT Handbook
Type
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Task Category
Pages *
Inquiries
Support PTs
Teaching
Environment
Support PTs
Inquiries
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Benchmark 4 Notes
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Status
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Inquiries
Live/Public
Inquiries
Program
Administration
Teaching
Environment
Professional
Development
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Teaching
Environment
Live/Public
Live/Public
Inquiries
Teaching
Environment
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
SCOE Events
Program
Administration
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Title
Type
Uploaded Document
Task Category
Pages *
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Website (URL)
Website (URL)
Program
Administration
Inquiries
Support PTs
Website (URL)
Support PTs
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
End-of-Year
Preparation
Professional
Development
Program
Administration
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Live/Public
Live/Public
BTSA Website
Uploaded Document
Status
Professional
Development
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Live/Public
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
SCOE Events
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Inquiries
Support PTs
Teaching
Environment
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Teaching
Environment
Live/Public
Title
Type
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Conversation Guide-Universal
Uploaded Document
Access: Teaching English Learners
Conversation Guide-Universal
Uploaded Document
Acess: Teaching Special Populations
Conversation Guide:Universal
Access: Equity for all Students
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Task Category
Pages *
Teaching
Environment
Self-Assessments
Support PTs
Teaching
Environment
Support PTs
Self-Assessments
Support PTs
Teaching
Environment
Self-Assessments
Support PTs
Teaching
Environment
Self-Assessments
Support PTs
Self-Assessments
Support PTs
Teaching
Environment
Weekly
Conversations
End-of-Year
Preparation
Teaching
Environment
Level 2
Requirements
Level 2
Requirements
Level 2
Requirements
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Program
Administration
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Status
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Title
Type
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
El Transition Plan
Uploaded Document
End-of-Year Activities
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
eStandards App
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Task Category
Pages *
Status
Not
Live/Hidden
End-of-Year
Preparation
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Teaching
Environment
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Level 2
Requirements
End-of-Year
Preparation
Self-Assessments
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
End-of-Year
Preparation
Teaching
Environment
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Program
Administration
Surveys and
Evaluations
Program
Administration
Support PTs
Surveys and
Evaluations
Surveys and
Evaluations
Inquiries
Not
Live/Hidden
Not
Live/Hidden
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Title
Type
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Generational Differences
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Not
Live/Hidden
Support PTs
Status
Uploaded Document
Task Category
Pages *
Uploaded Document
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Level 2
Requirements
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Not
Live/Hidden
Level 2
Requirements
Teaching
Environment
Teaching
Environment
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Live/Public
IIP Sample
Uploaded Document
Inquiries
Not
Live/Hidden
Uploaded Document
Initial Classroom/Assignment
Observation
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Inquiries
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Inquiries
End-of-Year
Preparation
Inquiries
Self-Assessments
Program
Administration
Teaching
Environment
Live/Public
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Live/Public
Title
Type
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Task Category
Pages *
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Teaching
Environment
End-of-Year
Preparation
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Level 2
Requirements
Level 2
Requirements
Observations
Professional
Development
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Status
SCOE Events
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Support PTs
Teaching
Environment
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Not
Live/Hidden
District Meetings
Inquiries
Self-Assessments
Support PTs
Live/Public
Title
Physical and Health Impairment
Standards
Preliminary Report from our
Program Assessment Document
Presentation of Level 2
Competencies
Professional Development Chart
Professional Development
Opportunities for Special Education
Teachers
Professional Development: Why and
How We Do It
Professional Induction Presentation
(PIP) Portfolion Rubric GUIDE
PT Roles and Responsibilities
Quickstart Video: How to Apply to
BTSA
Quickstart Video: How to Use the
MyBTSA Homepage (PTs)
Quickstart Video: How to Use the
Task Detail Page
Quickstart Video: How to Complete
Your Tasks
Quickstart Video: How to Use the
MyBTSA Homepage for SPs
Quickstart Video: How to Use the
MyBTSA hompage for Coordinators
Quickstart Video: How to Use the
SCOE Events Page
Quickstart Video: How to Use the
Task Overview Page
Quickstart Video: How to Use the
Weekly Conversations Page
Quickstart Videos: How to Use the
Professional Development Page
Retired My BTSA Site
Type
Uploaded Document
Task Category
Pages *
Level 2
Requirements
Status
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Not
Live/Hidden
Uploaded Document
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Professional
Development
Professional
Development
End-of-Year
Preparation
Surveys and
Evaluations
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Website (URL)
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
SCOE Events
Title
Type
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
SCOE PT Journey
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Task Category
Pages *
Program
Administration
Professional
Development
Live/Public
Self-Assessments
Live/Public
Self-Assessments
Self-Assessments
Self-Assessments
Self-Assessments
Self-Assessments
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Live/Public
Self-Assessments
Self-Assessments
Uploaded Document
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Not
Live/Hidden
SOLVED-Problem Solving
Status
Professional
Development
Professional
Development
Surveys and
Evaluations
Teaching
Environment
SCOE Events
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
SCOE Events
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
SCOE Events
Support PTs
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Title
Type
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Task Category
Pages *
Surveys and
Evaluations
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Weekly
Conversations
Inquiries
Inquiries
Professional
Development
Professional
Development
Professional
Development
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
End-of-Year
Preparation
Level 2
Requirements
Inquiries
Observations
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Support PTs
Weekly
Conversations
Weekly
Conversations
Uploaded Document
Website (URL)
Website (URL)
Welcome to Coordinators
Status
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Live/Public
Program
Administration
Teaching
Environment
Live/Public
Not
Live/Hidden
Not
Live/Hidden
Title
Type
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
Uploaded Document
* when applicable
Task Category
Pages *
Surveys and
Evaluations
Participant
Enrollment and
Recruitment
Program
Administration
Support PTs
Teaching
Environment
Support PTs
Status
Not
Live/Hidden
Not
Live/Hidden
Live/Public
Live/Public
School/District Information/Resources
PT SelfAssessment
SP
Assessment
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y
N
?
Comments
Checklist is complete
Informal Observation
Intake IIP
Self- Assessment
Self-Assessment: Pedagogy (Initial)
Candidate Competency
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
An assessment is provided
Self- Assessment
Self-Assessment: Pedagogy (Final)
Candidate Competency
DRAFT
Professional Induction Presentation (PIP)
Preparation Rubric: YEAR 2
Candidate:___________________________ SP Reviewer: _______________________________ Date:___________
Context for Teaching
PT SelfAssessment
SP
Assessment
Class Profile
Y N ?
Y N ?
School/District Information/Resources
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y
N
?
Checklist is complete
Copies of the observations of the CSTP and Induction Standards are included
Continuum of Teaching Practice/ Reflection
Document includes all of the essential components for creating a standardsbased lesson series
An assessment is provided
Comments
Y
N
?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Observation
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Y N ?
Reflection are focused on next steps, including implications for instruction and
differentiation
Continuum of Teaching Practice/ Reflection/Review of IIP
Document includes all of the essential components for creating a standardsbased lesson series
An assessment is provided
Reflection are focused on next steps, including implications for instruction and
differentiation
Continuum of Teaching Practice/ Reflection/Review of IIP
Candidate Competency
Task
PT SP DC
Program Administration
Coordinator Responsibilities
Program Administration
Budget
Program Administration
Program Administration
Participant Enrollment and
Recruitment
Participant Enrollment and
Recruitment
Participant Enrollment and
Recruitment
District Profile
Enroll PTs
SCOE Events
Coordinator Meetings
SCOE Events
Orientation Meeting
SCOE Events
FACT Training
SCOE Events
SP Update Event
X X
SCOE Events
Benchmark Seminars
X X X
SCOE Events
SCOE Events
X X
SCOE Events
Participate in a PIP
Teaching Environment
X
X
Category
Task
PT SP DC
Teaching Environment
Teaching Environment
Teaching Environment
Initial Observation
Self-Assessments
Pedagogy
Self-Assessments
Equity
Self-Assessments
Special Populations
Self-Assessments
English Learners
Self-Assessments
Self-Assessments
Inquiries
Inquiry - Equity
Inquiries
Inquiry #1
Inquiries
Inquiry #2
Inquiries
Independent Inquiry
Level 2 Requirements
CPR Requirement
Level 2 Requirements
Health Requirement
Level 2 Requirements
Technology Requirement
Level 2 Requirements
Professional Development
Professional Development
Support PTs
Support PTs
Support PTs
Support "Self-Assessments"
Support "Individual Induction Plan (IIP)"
Support PTs
Support "Inquiries"
Support PTs
Support PTs
Observations
Observations
Weekly Conversations
Weekly Conversations
Weekly Conversations
Weekly Conversations
Action Plan
X
X
X X
X
Category
Task
PT SP DC
Leadership Survey
Mid-Year Survey
Mid-Year Survey
PT Evaluation of SP Effectiveness
End-of-Year Preparation
End-of-Year Preparation
District Meetings
District Meetings
District Meetings
X
X
X
california
department
of
e d u cat i o n
commission
on
teacher
credentialing
Continuum of
Teaching Practice
Teaching Profession
for the
California Standards
california
BTSA Coordinators
(Selected by the District)
Roles and Responsibilities and Job Description
Communication
Keep SCOE staff apprised of all concerns and issues that may be surfacing with stakeholders
Regularly communicate with the BTSA office and other partners about implementation
Update Board Members annually about the BTSA Program
Share information about BTSA regularly with District Administrators, including Curriculum and
Instruction, Finance, Human Resources and Site Administrators
Assist with Recruitment
Work with Human Resources (or District Administrators) to maintain a current list of all teachers who are
eligible to participate
Contact new hires with eligibility and orientation information, and make sure that agreements are signed
Advise new hires of credential requirements, as needed
Assist in informing teachers about the SCOE Induction Orientation for eligible teachers
Work with Support Providers
Work with the District Administrators to select and match all Support Providers to Participating Teachers
Attend quarterly SCOE Benchmark Seminars with Support Providers and Participating Teachers
Monitor the success of the Support Provider/Participating Teacher match; recommend dismissal of any
Support Provider who is not successful
Provide additional counsel and support to district Support Providers as needed
Identify lead trainers in the district
Fiscal Duties
Work in collaboration with their business office to develop a yearly budget that provides money for BTSA
activities
Implement a district or partner plan for the cost and payment of participants in the Induction Program
Accountability
Monitor the day-to-day implementation of the program in the District
Arrange training for district level needs including district adopted materials in content areas and materials
for English Learners
Monitor completion of Participating Teachers on MyBTSA; meet with Support Provider/Participating
Teacher pairs who are behind in order to develop a plan for completion and modified timeline
Review Individual Induction Plans
Preview Induction Portfolios and evidence of credential candidates seeking credential completion
Assist in annual evaluation activities and preparation of all accountability reports for the state including
program review
Review all program evaluation data
Site Administrators
Schedule/attend Site Administrator training, including training in site administrator responsibilities for site
orientation
Provide regular updates on the program to the Site Administrator
Inform administrators about SCOE Benchmark Seminars
Meetings
Attend SCOE meetings with Consortium Directors
Facilitate the End-of-year Summative Event at SCOE
Attend SP Updates and Super Saturday offerings
I understand and will effectively fulfill the role and responsibilities of a BTSA Coordinator.
Signature /Date
page 1
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Glossary of Terms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Developmental Levels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Table of Contents
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Overview
page 2
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 3
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 4
Conclusion
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 5
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 6
Level 3: Applying
Implements the curriculum
using a variety of instructional
practices and supplemental
resources selected to improve
student understanding and
engagement. Maintains a
respectful and supportive
learning environment in which
all students can achieve. Utilizes
knowledge of CSTP to make
connections between elements
of effective instruction, learning
goals, assessments, and content
standards. Plans differentiated
instruction using a variety of
adjustments and adaptations
in lessons. Utilizes a variety
of assessments that provide
targeted data on student
learning to guide planning.
Collaborates and reflects
regularly with colleagues to
improve teaching practice
and student success.
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
Level 2: Exploring
Explores use of additional
instructional practices to
teach the curriculum and
support student understanding
and engagement. Guides the
development of a respectful
learning environment focused
on achievement. Expands
knowledge of related elements
of effective instruction,
learning goals, assessments,
and content as informed by
the CSTP. Plans lessons using
expanded understanding of
curriculum, related materials
and resources, and assessments.
Explores the use of different
types of assessments to expand
understanding of student
learning needs and support
planning. Seeks collaboration
with colleagues, resource
personnel, and families to
reflect on ways to improve
teaching practice and
student success.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Level 1: Emerging
Expands awareness of
curriculum and instructional
practices to support
understanding and engage
students in learning.
Recognizes the importance of
building a positive learning
environment that is focused
on achievement. Demonstrates
knowledge of teaching as
discrete skills as described
in the California Standards
for the Teaching Professional
(CSTP). Plans lessons
using available curriculum
and resources. Develops
understanding of required
assessments and uses of data
to inform student progress.
Works collaboratively with
assigned colleagues to reflect
on and improve teaching
practice and student success.
Note: The descriptions in each of the Developmental Levels are aligned to the CSTP standards.
Developmental Levels
Level 4: Integrating
Integrates extensive knowledge
of curriculum, instructional
practices, and supplemental
resources to enhance and
deepen student understanding
and engagement. Provides
a respectful and rigorous
learning environment that
supports and challenges all
students to achieve.
Articulates knowledge
of the inter-relationships
between elements of effective
instruction, learning goals,
assessments, and content across
the CSTP. Plans lessons using
a broad range of strategies
to differentiate instruction
as informed by multiple
assessments. Develops, adapts,
and integrates assessments
into instruction that provide
ongoing data to guide
planning differentiated
instruction matched to
assessed needs of students.
Analyzes and integrates
information from a wide range
of sources to expand skills of
collaboration and reflection
as a habit of practice and to
impact teacher effectiveness
and student learning.
page 7
Level 5: Innovating
Designs and implements
comprehensive curriculum with
multiple and varied instructional
strategies and resources to
support in depth studies of
content and promote high
levels of student understanding
and engagement. Facilitates
a learning environment that
is respectful, rigorous, and
responsive in advancing
student achievement. Applies
in depth knowledge of the
CSTP to interconnect effective
instruction, learning goals, and
assessment within and across
content areas. Plans instruction
flexibly utilizing a repertoire
of instructional practices
to differentiate instruction
as informed by ongoing
assessments. Utilizes a wide
range of assessments strategically,
systematically, and flexibly
throughout instruction to
identify student learning needs
and guide ongoing adjustments
in instruction that maximize
student learning. Engages in
and facilitates collaborative
learning communities focused
on providing quality instruction
and optimal learning for the full
range of students.
Level 5
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Utilizes knowledge
of CSTP to makes
connections between
elements of effective
instruction, learning
goals, assessments, and
content standards.
Expands knowledge
of related elements of
effective instruction,
learning goals,
assessments, and
content as informed
by the CSTP.
Demonstrates knowledge
of teaching as discrete
skills as described in the
California Standards
for the Teaching
Professional (CSTP).
Understanding
and Organizing
Subject Matter for
Student Learning
page 8
Applies in depth
knowledge of the
CSTP to interconnect
effective instruction,
learning goals, and
assessment within and
across content areas.
Facilitates a learning
environment that is
respectful, rigorous, and
responsive in advancing
student achievement.
Provides a respectful
and rigorous learning
environment that
supports and challenges
all students to achieve.
Maintains a respectful
and supportive learning
environment in which all
students can achieve.
Recognizes the
importance of building
a positive learning
environment that is
focused on achievement.
Creating and
Maintaining Effective
Environments for
Student Learning
Articulates knowledge
of the inter-relationships
between elements of
effective instruction,
learning goals,
assessments, and content
across the CSTP.
Integrates extensive
knowledge of curriculum,
instructional practices,
and supplemental
resources to enhance
and deepen student
understanding and
engagement.
Innovating
Level 4
Integrating
Implements the
curriculum using a
variety of instructional
practices and
supplemental resources
selected to improve
student understanding
and engagement.
Level 3
Applying
Explores use of
additional instructional
practices to teach the
curriculum and support
student understanding
and engagement.
Level 2
Exploring
Expands awareness
of curriculum and
instructional practices
to support understanding
and engage students
in learning.
Level 1
Emerging
Engaging and
Supporting All
Students in Learning
CSTP
Works collaboratively
with assigned colleagues
to reflect on and improve
teaching practice and
student success.
Developing as a
Professional Educator
Seeks collaboration
with colleagues, resource
personnel, and families to
reflect on ways to improve
teaching practice and
student success.
Level 2
Exploring
Level 3
Applying
Collaborates and
reflects regularly with
colleagues to improve
teaching practice and
student success.
Utilizes a variety of
assessments that provide
targeted data on student
learning to guide
planning. Collaborates
and reflects regularly with
colleagues to improve
teaching practice and
student success.
Plans differentiated
instruction using a
variety of adjustments
and adaptations in lessons.
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
Develops understanding
of required assessments
and uses of data to inform
student progress.
Assessing Students
for Learning
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Level 1
Emerging
Planning Instruction
and Designing
Learning Experiences
for All Students
CSTP
Level 4
Integrating
page 9
Plans instruction
flexibly utilizing a
repertoire of instructional
practices to differentiate
instruction as informed
by ongoing assessments.
Level 5
Innovating
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 1 0
Terminology
Structure
Glossary of Terms
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Glossary of Terms
page 1 1
http://depts.washington.edu/pdacent/courses/
autism101/39.php
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Glossary of Terms
page 1 2
5.7
page 1 3
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
1.6
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 1 4
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 1 5
help all students learn, practice, internalize, and apply subject-specific learning
1.1 Using knowledge of students to engage them in learning
strategies and procedures?
As teachers develop, they may ask, How do I... or Why do I
use differentiated instruction to meet the assessed learning needs of students and
know my students as people and as learners?
increase active participation in learning?
understand reasons for behavior?
adapt materials and resources, make accommodations, and use appropriate assistive
recognize atypical behavior in students?
equipment and other technologies to support students diverse learning needs?
build trust with students and foster relationships so that students can thrive
utilize multiple types of technology to facilitate learning?
academically?
examine and use resources that minimize bias
adapt my teaching to reflect knowledge of my students?
differentiate instruction based on what I know about my students
1.5 Promoting critical thinking through inquiry, problem
strengths, interests and needs?
solving, and reflection
get to know parents and connect with the community where I teach?
As teachers develop, they may ask,, How do I or Why do I
review students records such as IFSP/IEP documents including
encourage students to use multiple approaches and solutions
the behavior plans and Transition documents?
Standard 1
to solve problems?
Engaging and Supporting
encourage students to ask critical questions and
1.2 Connecting learning to students prior
consider diverse perspectives about subject matter?
knowledge, backgrounds, life experiences
All Students in Learning
provide opportunities for students to think about,
and interests
discuss, and evaluate content?
As teachers develop, they may ask,, How do I or
Teachers know and care about their students
ask questions to facilitate discussion, clarify, and
Why do I
in order to engage them in learning. They connect
extend students thinking
help students see the connections between what
support students to think and communicate with
they already know and the new material?
learning to students prior knowledge, backgrounds, life
clarity and precision?
connect classroom learning to students life
experiences, and interests. They connect subject matter
help students apply previous learning to new
experiences and cultural backgrounds?
situations?
support all students to use first and second
to meaningful, real-life contexts. Teachers use a variety
encourage students to create, imagine, and
language skills to achieve learning goals?
of instructional strategies, resources, and technologies
innovate?
open a lesson or unit to capture student attention
to meet the diverse learning needs of students. They
help students to develop and use strategies and
and interest?
technologies for accessing knowledge and information?
build on students comments and questions during a
promote critical thinking through inquiry, problem
consider task analysis in supporting the learning levels
lesson to extend their understanding?
solving, and reflection. They monitor student
of all students?
1.3 Connecting subject matter to meaningful,
learning and adjust instruction
real-life experiences
1.6 Monitoring student learning and adjusting
while teaching.
As teachers develop, they may ask,, How do I or Why do I
instruction while teaching
establish a connection between subject matter and purpose
As teachers develop, they may ask,, How do I or Why do I
for learning?
systematically check for student understanding and revise plans
make connections between the subject matter and real-life contexts?
accordingly?
seek feedback from students regarding relevance of subject matter to their lives?
incorporate a variety of strategies in a lesson to check for student understanding?
engage all students in a variety of learning experiences that accommodate the
monitor the learning of students with limited English proficiency or of students
different ways they learn?
with special needs?
provide opportunities for all students to acquire and practice skills in meaningful contexts?
adjust the lesson plan to accelerate instruction when I determine that the pace of the
lesson is too slow?
1.4 Using a variety of instructional strategies, resources, and
make on the spot changes in my lesson based on students interests and questions?
technologies to meet students diverse learning needs
provide additional support and opportunities for students to learn when some
As teachers develop, they may ask,, How do I or Why do I
students have mastered the lesson objective(s) and others have not?
use a variety of strategies to introduce, explain, and restate subject matter concepts
adjust my lesson when I dont have enough time to complete everything I planned to do?
and processes so all students understand?
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 1 6
Students engage
insinglelessons or sequence
of lessons that include
some adjustments based on
assessments.
Evidence:
Uses comprehensive
knowledge of students to
make ongoing adjustments
and accommodations in
instruction.
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
TEACHER
STUDENT
page 1 7
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Exploring
Develops awareness of
prior knowledge, culture,
backgrounds, life experience,
and interests represented
among students.
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 1.2 Connecting learning to students prior knowledge, backgrounds, life experiences, and interests
TEACHER
STUDENT
page 1 8
Integrates connections to
meaningful, real-life contexts
in planning subject matter
instruction and is responsive
during instruction to engage
students in relating to subject
matter.
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
* see Glossary
Evidence:
Exploring
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
TEACHER
STUDENT
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 1 9
Students participate in
instruction using strategies,
resources, and technologies
matched to their learning
needs.
Evidence:
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
Explores additional
instructional strategies,
resources, and technologies
in single lessons or sequence
of lessons to meet students
diverse learning needs.
Exploring
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 1.4 Using a variety of instructional strategies, resources, and technologies to meet students diverse learning needs
TEACHER
STUDENT
page 2 0
Facilitates systematic
opportunities for students
to apply critical thinking by
designing structured inquires
into complex problems.
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Exploring
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 1.5 Promoting critical thinking through inquiry, problem solving, and reflection
TEACHER
STUDENT
Students successfully
participate and stay engaged in
learning activities.
Makes adjustments to
instruction based on
observation of student
engagement and regular checks
for understanding.
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Exploring
Emerging
Integrating
page 2 1
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 1.6 Monitoring student learning and adjusting instruction while teaching
TEACHER
STUDENT
page 2 2
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 2 3
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
Students participate in
occasional community building
activities, designed to promote
caring, fairness, and respect.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Integrating
page 2 4
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples from your teaching practice
and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 2.1 Promoting social development and responsibility within a caring community where each student is treated fairly and respectfully
Standard 2 CSTP: Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning
TEACHER
STUDENT
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Integrates a variety of
structures for interaction that
engage students constructively
and productively in learning.
Integrating
page 2 5
Students participate in
monitoring and changing
the design of learning
environments and structures
for interactions.
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 2.2 Creating physical or virtual learning environments that promote student learning, reflect diversity, and encourage constructive and
productive interactions among students
Standard 2 CSTP: Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning
TEACHER
STUDENT
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
Explores strategies to
de-escalate student behaviors.
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Emerging
page 2 6
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 2.3 Establishing and maintaining learning environments that are physically, intellectually, and emotionally safe
Standard 2 CSTP: Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning
TEACHER
STUDENT
page 2 7
Designs, implements,
and facilitates training on
effective strategies to ensure
generalization of skills.
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 2.4 Creating a rigorous learning environment with high expectations and appropriate support for all students
Standard 2 CSTP: Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning
TEACHER
STUDENT
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Establishes expectations,
rules, and consequences for
individual and group behavior.
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Integrates equitable
expectations, positive
supports, and consequences for
individual and group behavior
within and across learning
activities.
Integrating
page 2 8
Students demonstrate
positive behavior, consistent
participation and are valued for
their unique identities.
Facilitates a positive
environment using systems
that ensure students take an
active role in monitoring and
maintaining high standards for
individual and group behaviors.
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 2.5 Developing, communicating, and maintaining high standards for individual and group behavior
Standard 2 CSTP: Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning
TEACHER
STUDENT
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Responds to disruptive
behavior.
Exploring
Emerging
page 2 9
Innovating
Integrating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 2.6 Employing classroom routines, procedures, norms, and supports for positive behavior to ensure a climate in which all students can learn
Standard 2 CSTP: Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning
TEACHER
STUDENT
Exploring
page 3 0
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Standard 2 CSTP: Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning
TEACHER
STUDENT
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 3 1
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 3 2
3.4 Utilizing instructional strategies that are appropriate to the subject matter
3.1 Demonstrating knowledge of subject matter, academic content standards,
and curriculum frameworks
As teachers develop they may ask, How do I or Why do I
As teachers develop they may ask, How do I or Why do I
develop and use a repertoire of instructional strategies appropriate to the subject matter?
ensure that my subject matter knowledge is sufficient to support student learning?
build on students life experiences, prior knowledge, and interests to make subject matter relevant
continue to keep my subject matter knowledge current?
and meaningful to students?
identify, understand, and teach the key concepts and underlying themes and relationships in the
use effective instructional strategies and approaches to illustrate a concept and its connections
academic content standards and state curriculum frameworks?
within and across subject areas?
integrate key concepts, themes, relationships, and connections across subject
challenge all students to think critically in the subject area?
matter areas?
help all students develop enthusiasm for and a deep knowledge of the subject matter?
ensure that my knowledge of the subject matter incorporates
use strategies that make the depth and complexity of subject matter
different perspectives, appropriate to the discipline?
understandable to all students?
Standard 3
maintain and utilize current understanding of relevant content
individualize instructional strategies appropriate to the subject matter
considering accessibility and learning needs of individuals with
standards and frameworks?
Understanding and
exceptionalities?
Organizing Subject Matter
3.2 Applying knowledge of student development
expand expertise with research-based effective practices
for Student Learning
and proficiencies to ensure student understanding
appropriate to the subject matter?
of subject matter
Teachers exhibit in-depth working knowledge
As teachers develop they may ask, How do I or
3.5 Using and adapting resources, technologies,
of subject matter, academic content standards, and
Why do I
and standards-aligned instructional materials,
curriculum frameworks. They apply knowledge of
apply my knowledge of human development and
including adopted materials, to make subject
student development and proficiencies to ensure student
matter accessible to all students
learning theory to the unique students that I teach?
As teachers develop they may ask, How do I or
acquire understanding of my students individual
understanding of content. They organize curriculum to
Why do I
cognitive, social, emotional and physical development?
facilitate students understanding of the subject matter.
know the full range of materials, resources, and
connect content being taught to students prior
Teachers utilize instructional strategies that are appropriate
knowledge and experiences?
technologies provided by the school or district?
build understanding of my English learners levels
select materials, resources, and technologies to support
to the subject matter. They use and adapt resources,
of language
differentiated student learning of the subject matter?
including adopted materials, to make subject matter
acquisition in order to know how to best support their
select and use learning materials and resources that reflect the
accessible to all students. They address the needs
learning?
diversity in my classroom?
of English learners and students with special
build understanding of my students with special needs in order
use technologies to convey key concepts in the subject matter?
to know how and when to differentiate instruction?
learn about and access new instructional resources to support
needs to provide equitable access to
student
learning?
the content.
3.3 Organizing curriculum to facilitate student
expand expertise with evidence-based instructional and assistive
understanding of the subject matter
technology to support students access to challenging content?
As teachers develop they may ask, How do I or Why do I
use my knowledge of student readiness to learn to organize, sequence, and enhance
3.6 Addressing the needs of English learners and students with
special needs to provide equitable access to the content
curriculum?
As teachers develop they may ask, How do I or Why do I
apply my knowledge of the subject matter to organize curriculum, plan lessons and units, and
address the English Language Development (ELD) standards as they relate to my English
select instructional strategies that demonstrate key concepts and their interrelationships?
organize subject matter to reveal and value different cultural perspectives?
learners level of language acquisition?
incorporate subject or grade level expectations and curriculum frameworks in organizing subject matter?
address the Individual Education Plan (IEP) goals and objectives of my students with special needs?
utilize standards-aligned and/or adopted curriculum in ways that support student learning?
select materials, resources, and technologies to support subject matter instruction of my English
apply my knowledge of various disciplines and integrate cross-disciplinary skills to plan
learners and students with special needs?
sequenced lessons appropriate to students accessibility and learning levels?
ensure access to the critical concepts and themes in the academic content standards and state
curriculum frameworks for students at various levels of English proficiency and for students with special needs?
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 3 3
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Integrating
Innovating
page 3 4
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Standard 3 CSTP: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning
TEACHER
page 3 5
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Teaches subject-specific
vocabulary following
curriculum guidelines.
Integrates knowledge of
individual student development
to inform instructional
decisions to ensure student
understanding of subject
matter including related
academic language.
Expands knowledge of
student development and
implements learning activities
in single lessons or sequence of
lessons that address students
proficiencies and support
understanding of subject
matter including related
academic language.
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 3.2 Applying knowledge of student development and proficiencies to ensure student understanding of subject matter
Standard 3 CSTP: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Examines organization of
curriculum and considers
adjustments in single lessons or
sequence of lessons to support
understanding and access of
subject matter.
Follows organization of
curriculum as provided by site
and district to support student
understanding and access of
subject matter.
Evidence:
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Integrates knowledge of
cross-disciplinary skills,
curriculum and resources to
organize and adjust instruction
within and across subject
matter to ensure student
access and extend student
understanding.
Integrating
Innovating
page 3 6
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 3.3 Organizing curriculumto facilitate student understanding of the subject matter
Standard 3 CSTP: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning
TEACHER
Exploring
Integrating
Integrates research-based
effective practices and
instructional strategies
appropriate to subject matter to
meet students diverse learning,
to ensure student understanding
of academic language,and
guide students in understanding
connections within and across
subject matter.
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Emerging
page 3 7
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 3.4 Utilizing instructional strategiesthat are appropriate to the subject matter
Standard 3 CSTP: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
page 3 8
Identifies technological
resources needed.
Exploresadditional
instructional materials,
resources, andtechnologies to
make subject matter accessible
to students.
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 3.5 Using and adapting resources, technologies, and standards-aligned instructional materials,including adopted materials,to make subject
matter accessible to all students Evidence of Practice:
Standard 3 CSTP: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning
TEACHER
Integrates knowledge of
English language development
and English learners strengths
and assessed needs to
differentiate English language
and content instruction.
Integrating
Applying
Innovating
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 3 9
* Please see the additional Standard elements that are of particular importance in the effective instruction of English Learners: Standard Element 1.2 Connecting learning to students prior knowledge,
backgrounds, life experiences, and interests Standard Element 3.2 Applying knowledge of student development and proficiencies to ensure student understanding of subject matter
Standard Element 6.4 Working with families to support student learning
Evidence:
Exploring
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 3.6 Addressing the needs of English Learners and students with special needs*to provide equitable access to the content
Standard 3 CSTP: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning
TEACHER
Communicates and
collaborates with colleagues,
support staff and families to
ensure consistent instruction.
Supports families in positive
engagement with the school.
Initiates and monitors
referral processes and followup meetings to ensure that
students receive support and/
or extended learning that
is integrated into the core
curriculum.
Integrates accommodations,
adaptations, and extensions to
instruction for the full range
of students with special needs
to ensure adequate support and
challenge.
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Innovating
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 4 0
* The full range of students with special needs includes students with IEPs, 504 Plans and advanced learners. Please see the additional Standard elements that are of particular importance in the effective
instruction of students with special needs: Standard Element 2.6: Employing classroom routines, procedures, norms, and supports for positive behavior to ensure climate in which all students can learn.
Standards 2 and 4 contain multiple references to differentiation, adaptations, and adjustments that are all critical supports for students with special needs.
Evidence:
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 3.6 Addressing the needs of English Learners and students with special needs* to provide equitable access to the content
Standard 3 CSTP: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 4 1
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 4 2
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 4 3
Examinespotential sources
of bias and stereotyping
when planning lessons. Uses
culturally responsive pedagogy
in planning.
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
page 4 4
Engages students in
theanalysis ofbias,
stereotyping, and assumptions.
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 4.1 Using knowledge of students academic readiness, language proficiency, cultural background, and individual development to plan instruction.
Standard 4 CSTP: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for all Students
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 4 5
Evidence:
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 4.2 Establishing and articulating goals for student learning Evidence of Practice:
Standard 4 CSTP: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for all Students
TEACHER
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Usesavailable curriculum
guidelines for daily, short- and
long-term plans.
Exploring
Emerging
page 4 6
Innovating
Integrating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 4.3 Developing and sequencing long-term and short-term instructional plans to support student learning
Standard 4 CSTP: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for all Students
TEACHER
Integratesresults froma
broad range of assessments
into planning to meet
studentsdiverse learning and
language needs.
Plans differentiated
instruction using strategiesto
address learning styles and
meet students assessed
language andlearning
needs.Incorporates
appropriate support and
challenge for students.
Incorporates instructional
strategies into ongoing
planning address culturally
responsive pedagogy,and
students diverse language,
andlearning needs. Considers
strategies to provide support
and challenge for students.
Integrating
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Exploring
Plans instruction
that incorporates
strategiessuggested by
curriculum guidelines.
Emerging
Innovating
page 4 7
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 4.4 Planning instruction that incorporates appropriate strategies to meet the learning needs of all students
Standard 4 CSTP: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for all Students
TEACHER
Exploring
Makes adjustments
and adaptations to
differentiateinstructional
plans.Uses culturally
responsive pedagogy
andadditional materialsto
support students diverse
learning needs.
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Emerging
Integrating
page 4 8
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 4.5 Adapting instructional plans and curricular materials to meet the assessed learning needs of all students.
Standard 4 CSTP: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for all Students
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 4 9
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 5 0
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 5 1
page 5 2
Demonstrates purposeful
use of a wide range of
accommodations and
modifications for local
assessments systematically and
flexibly.
Integrates a variety of
characteristics into assessments
to allow students with a
range of learning needs to
demonstrate what they know
without bias.
Demonstrates purposeful
use ofa wide range of
assessments to support
differentiatedstudent learning
needs and reflect progress.
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Is aware of accommodations
and modifications for state and
local assessments as outlined in
individual students IEP.
Begins to identify specific
purposes and uses of
accommodations and
modifications for state and
local assessments.
Exploring
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 5.1 Applying knowledge of the purposes,characteristics, and uses of different types of assessments
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
page 5 3
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 5.2 Collecting and analyzing assessment data from a variety of sources to inform instruction
TEACHER
Systematically reviews
data individually and with
colleagues that allows for
evidence of educational benefit.
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
page 5 4
Innovating
Integrating
Exploring
Applying
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 5.3 Reviewing data, both individually and with colleagues, to monitor student learning
TEACHER
Exploring
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Plansadjustments in
instruction to address learning
needs of individual students.
Emerging
page 5 5
Innovating
Integrating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 5.4 Using assessment data to establish learning goals and to plan, differentiate, and modify instruction
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
* Consider the inclusion of English Language Development or Academic English goals along with content goals.
Evidence:
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
page 5 6
Provides systematic
opportunities for student selfassessment, goal setting, and
monitoring progress.
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 5.5 Involving all students in self-assessment, goal setting*, and monitoring progress
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Integrates a variety
of technologies into
thedevelopment,
implementation, analysis
of assessments, and
communication of student
learning to all audiences.
Integrating
page 5 7
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 5.6 Using available technologies to assist in assessment, analysis, and communication of student learning
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
page 5 8
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 5.7 Using assessment information to share timely and comprehensible feedback with students and their families
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 5 9
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 6 0
Standard 6
6.2 Establishing professional goals and engaging in continuous
6.5 Engaging local communities in support of the instructional
and purposeful professional growth and development
program
Developing as a
As teachers develop, they may ask, How do I or Why do I
As teachers develop, they may ask, How do I or Why do I
Professional Educator
maintain an attitude of lifelong learning?
increase my understanding of the cultures and dynamics of my students
establish goals and seek out opportunities for professional
communities?
growth and development?
value and respect the students communities and appreciate the role of
Teachers
reflect
on
their
teaching
practice
ensure that professional goals are informed by appropriate resources
community in student learning?
to support student learning. They establish
such as the knowledge base for teaching, school and district priorities,
promote collaboration between school and community?
colleagues, supervisors, mentors, and my personal reflections?
identify and draw upon school, district, and local community social
professional goals and engage in continuous and
use professional literature, district professional development, and
service resources to benefit students and their families?
purposeful professional growth and development.
other professional opportunities to increase my understanding of
seek out and use additional resources from the local community and
They collaborate with colleagues and engage in the
teaching and learning?
businesses to support student learning?
learn more about my own professional roles and responsibilities?
provide my students with community-based experiences that support
broader professional community to support teacher and
coninue to seek out and refine approaches that make the curriculum
their learning?
student learning. Teachers learn about and work with
accessible to all students?
families to support student learning. They engage
expand my knowledge and effective application of new instructional
6.6 Managing professional responsibilities to
methods and technologies?
maintain motivation and commitment to all students
local communities in support of the instructional
evaluate and incorporate research to utilize evidence-based practices?
As teachers develop, they may ask, How do I or Why do I
program. They manage professional responsibilities
challenge myself intellectually and creatively throughout my career?
to maintain motivation and commitment
6.3 Collaborating with colleagues and the broader
find support and develop strategies to balance professional responsibilities
professional community to support teacher
with my personal needs?
to all students. Teachers demonstrate
and student learning
manage stress and maintain a positive attitude with students and colleagues?
professional responsibility, integrity,
address the complications and challenges of teaching?
As teachers develop, they may ask, How do I or Why do I
and ethical conduct.
collaborate with teachers, administrators, education specialist, paraeducators, and
identify sources of engagement and renewal in my professional work?
staff to ensure that all students diverse learning needs, interests, and strengths are met?
remain receptive to the feedback of colleagues, mentors, and supervisors in support of my
6.7 Demonstrating professional responsibility, integrity, and
teaching practice and student learning?
ethical conduct
As teachers develop, they may ask, How do I or Why do I
support school and district goals and priorities?
contribute to school-wide events, activities, and decision-making?
remain informed of, understand, and uphold the professional codes, ethical responsibilities, and legal requirements
establish and maintain productive relationships with other school staff to become a visible and valued member of the
applicable to the profession?
school and district communities?
contribute to school and student success by being knowledgeable of learning goals, standards, and objectives
contribute to the learning of other educators?
established by relevant national, state, and local organizations and stakeholders?
benefit from and contribute to professional organizations to improve my teaching?
meet my professional obligations to implement school, district, state, and federal policies and guidelines?
benefit from and add to the knowledge base of the profession?
extend my knowledge about my professional and legal responsibilities for students learning, behavior, and safety?
provide guidance and direction to paraeducators, tutors, and volunteers?
maintain professional conduct and integrity in the classroom and school community?
provide a continuum of support from consultation, collaboration, co-teaching to coaching/mentoring with multi- or
interact appropriately with students and families outside the classroom?
interdisciplinary team members?
demonstrate my professional obligations to students, colleagues, school, and the profession?
ensure joint responsibility for student growth in academic, behavioral, and social/emotional learning?
resolve conflict and build consensus through advocacy for improved programs, services, and outcomes for students?
C a l i f o r n i a S t a n d a r d s f o r t h e Te a c h i n g P r o f e s s i o n , 2 0 0 9
page 6 1
Engages in reflection
individually and with
colleagues on the relationship
between making adjustments
in teaching practice and impact
on the full range of learners.
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Exploring
Emerging
Integrating
page 6 2
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
page 6 3
Contributes to professional
organizations, incorporates
research, and development
opportunities to extend own
teaching practice.
Innovating
Integrating
Exploring
Applying
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 6.2 Establishing professional goals andengaging in continuous andpurposeful professional growth and development
TEACHER
Employs paraeducators,
tutors, and volunteers utilizing
individual strengths matched
with student needs.
Integrating
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Exploring
Emerging
page 6 4
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 6.3 Collaborating with colleaguesand the broader professional communityto support teacher and student learning
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
page 6 5
Supportsfamilies to contribute
to the classroom and school.
Adjusts communications to
families based on awareness
ofcultural norms and wide
range of experiences with
schools.Promotes ongoing
effective feedback systems
between students, families, and
school.
Evidence:
Innovating
Integrating
Applying
Exploring
Emerging
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
TEACHER
Exploring
Includes knowledge of
communities when designing
and implementing instruction.
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
Includes references or
connections to communities
in single lessons or sequence of
lessons.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Usesavailable neighborhood
and community resources in
single lessons.
Emerging
Integrating
page 6 6
Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
TEACHER
Anticipates professional
responsibilities and manages
time and effort required to
meet expectations.
Applying
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Demonstrates commitment
by exploring ways to address
individual student needs.
Maintains professional
responsibilities in timely ways
and seeks support as needed.
Develops an understanding of
professional responsibilities.
Exploring
Emerging
page 6 7
Supports colleagues to
maintain the motivation,
resiliency, and energy to ensure
that all students achieve.
Innovating
Integrating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
Element 6.6 Managing professional responsibilities to maintain motivation and commitment to all students
TEACHER
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Evidence:
Maintains professional conduct and integrity in the classroom and school community.
Complies with legal and professional obligations to protect the privacy, health, and safety of students, families, and other school
professionals.
Understands and implements school and district policies and state and federal law in responding to inappropriate or violent student
behavior.
Maintains a non-hostile classroom environment and carries out laws and district guidelines for reporting cases of sexual harassment.
Reports suspected cases of child abuse, and/or neglect as outlined in the California Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act.
Adheres to legal and ethical obligations in teaching the full range of learners, including English learners and students with special
needs.
Is aware of own personal values and biases and recognizes ways in which these values and biases affect the teaching and learning of
students.
* As follows:
Follows all state education codes, legal requirements, district and site policies, contractual agreements, and ethical responsibilities.*
page 6 8
Contributes to building
professional community and
holding peers accountable to
norms of respectful treatment and
communication.
Integrating Innovating
Evidence of Practice: Understanding that the levels become increasingly complex and sophisticated while integrating the skills of previous levels, what examples
from your teaching practice and students performance inform your self-assessment? 1) Record detail of evidence discussed 2) Assess level of practice 3) Date
TEACHER
Stanford University
Lisa Danielson
Edna Shoemaker
Sarah Solari
Kendyll Stansbury
Colleen Stobbe
Page Tompkins
Starla Wierman
Andrea Whittaker
Sarah Young
CA Department of Education
Karen Sacramento
Lynda Nichols
Ron Taylor
page 6 9
2014 Revisions
Executive Officer
Dale A. Janssen
Ex Officio Representatives
Shane MartinAssociation of Independent California Colleges and Universities
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
Terence Janicki
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Teri Clark
Wendy Baron
Educator Employer
The Continuum of Teaching Practice was funded through the New Teacher Center
with generous support from the Becky Morgan Family Foundation.
Ting Sun, ChairPublic Representative
California Commission on
Teacher Credentialing
CSBA
Priscilla Cox
Cindy Gappa
Gail Kirby
Eloise Lopez Metcalfe
Theresa Montao
Susan Rich
Sue Westbrook
Ruth Yopp-Edwards
Wendy Baron
Michelle Cepello
Yvonne Chan
Gregory W. Jones
Teri Clark
Edna Shoemaker
Ellen Ringer
Nancy Farnan
Helen Garcia Rockett
Ira Lit
Paula Lovo
Robert McClurg
Betty McEady
Cara Mendoza
Marisol Rexach
Luis Rodriguez
Jodie Schwartzfarb
Steve Turley
Andrea Whittaker
Ting Sun
page 7 0
CSU
CFT
CCESSA
UC
AICCU
Lewis Chappelear
The Continuum of Teaching Practice is not designed for use as a stand-alone observation or evaluation instrument.
Developed in collaboration with the CCTC, CDE and New Teacher Center. Revised June 2014.
Karen Sacramento
C on t i n u u m o f Te a c h i n g P r a c t i c e
Terry Janicki
Rae Belisle
Jorge Lopez
James D. Aschwanden
David P. Lopez
Representing
Educator Employer
ACSA
California Department
of Education
california
department
of
e d u cat i o n
commission
on
teacher
credentialing
california
DESIGNTEAMMEMBERS
LisaCoates
DISTRICT
CaliforniaMontessoriProject
RamonaDuran(Retired)
TwinRivers
LorieGarrett(Retired)
FCUSD
CayleeKizer
TwinRivers
KeiLucas
FCUSD
KathyMagnani
Center
BarbaraScott
Rocklin
JenniferStuck
FCUSD
DeeTorrington
SteveWright
Rocklin
RiverDelta
EXPERTISE
HumanResourceOfficer,
behaviormanagement,
credentialing
English,Reading,Teacherofthe
Year(2),DistrictLevel
SpecialEducation,behavior
management,historyofthe
InductionProgram
SpecialEducationnewest
information
SpecialEducation,behavior
management,organization,
Channel10Teacherofthe
Month
Science,Methodicalconcrete
sequencial
ELTeacher,Presidentofthe
TeachersUnion
SpecialEducation,DistrictLevel
ProgramSpecialist,Autism,
SeverelyHandicapped
SpecialEducationStateLevel
Technology,TeachersUnion,
KindergartenTeacher,indepth
understandingoftheprogram
BTSARolesandResponsibilities:ParticipatingTeacher
1.
UseproceduresandcalendarinformationlocatedonMyBTSA.
2.CompleterequiredMyBTSAwebsitedocumentation.
3.MeetweeklywithyourSupportProviderforanaverage1.5hourseachweekfor26weekseachyearfor
twoyears.Document40hoursofreflectiveconversationsonMyBTSA.
4.
Participate with the expectations of confidentiality in informal and formal formative assessment
observation(s)withyourSupportProvider.
5.CompleteanInquiryCycle(s).ImplementandperiodicallyreviseanannualIndividualizedInductionPlan
(IIP)[ActionPlan]basedontheresultsofformativeassessment.RecordyourIIPinformationonMyBTSA.
6.DevelopaprofessionalteachingportfoliobasedontheevidencecollectedthroughFACT
7. CompletethesummaryinterviewwithyourSupportProviderinpreparationforyourpresentationatthe
(ProfessionalInductionPresentationPIP)
8. BasedonyourIIPandwithyourSP/Coordinatorapproval,participateinprofessionaldevelopment.
9.
Attendfour(4)BenchmarkSupportSeminarssponsoredbySCOE.
10.
CollaboratewithyourSupportProvider,SiteAdministrator(s),andcolleagues.
11.
Participateintheprogramevaluationprocess.ProvidefeedbackonprogrameffectivenesstotheProgram
Director,BTSACoordinator,andAdvisoryCouncil.
12.
InformyourBTSACoordinatorortheSCOEBTSADirectorifforanyreasonyouandyourSupportProvider
are not working together in a professional and productive manner. Changes can always be made, and
thereisnofaultorblameonanyone.
13.
Providethefollowing:
IndividualInductionPlans(IIP)
FormativeAssessmentDocumentsincludingstudentwork
14.Understandthefiscalresponsibilityofclearingacredential(s)ie.District/partnersupport,personalcost.
I understand that this induction program is part of the learningtoteach continuum. Induction
requirementsforthisprogramaredesignedtobuildonmyprofessionalteacherpreparation
____________________________________________ _______________________________________
Signature
Date
EDUCATIONSPECIALISTINTAKEADVISEMENT
FirstName:
MiddleName:
District:
LastName:
School
BTSAExperience:
CurrentlyenrolledinBTSA Year1 Year2
Which Program?
CompletedBTSAinaPriorYearWhatYearswereyouenrolled?____________
NeverCompletedBTSA
CREDENTIALINFORMATION(Markallthatapply)
Education Specialist Credential
CURRENTASSIGNMENT
Other:
University
InternProgramcompletedthrough
TEACHINGEXPERIENCE
YearsofTeachingExperience ontheEducationSpecialistcredentialasofJune2015
LongTermGoalsrelatedtoyourcurrentassignment:(e.g.addinganauthorization;completingaMAprogram)
Yr
1
Yr
2
IndividualizedInductionPlanandEvidence
AllcandidatesmustdevelopanIndividualizedInductionPlanincollaborationwithSCOEandtheemployer.IndividualizedInductionPlan
CompletionEvidencedemonstratinghowtheClear(LevelII)CredentialStandardshavebeenmetwillbesubmittedtotheSacramentoBTSA
Consortium.
Asaneligibleteacher,IhavebeeninformedoftheoptionsregardingclearingmyEducationSpecialistpreliminary(Level1)credential. Iagreetoworkwithmy
supportprovidertodevelopaninitialIntakeIIPduringthefirst60daysofemployment. IunderstandthatImustsuccessfullycompleteallprogram
requirementsformymultiple/singlesubjectcredential(ifappropriate)aswellasmyEducationSpecialistinordertoberecommendedbySCOEfora
ProfessionalCredential(s).BTSAfundingisastateallocationandissubjecttotheavailabilityoffundsintheAnnualBudgetAct. Thesignatureofthedistrict
representativedoesnotfinanciallynorcontractuallyobligatethedistrict.Instead,thisisanagreementamongthecandidate,programsponsorandthe
employerrelatedtoexpandingtheskillsoftheEducationSpecialistwithconsiderationofassignmentandauthorization.
CandidateSignature
DistrictDesignee
ProgramSponsor
Conversation Guide
Education Specialist
Purpose: Use these questions to identify areas that would be helpful to discuss with your support provider.
Participating Teacher:
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
Assemble Information
Caseload Profile
School Information
District and
Community
Information
How can I most effectively review and monitor each students Individual Education Plan (IEP)?
What is the best method for organizing my student records and confidential files?
What is the plan to track the IEP review dates and timelines?
What type of evidence/data do I need for student progress toward IEP goals?
What is my plan for informing the general education teachers of the students specific needs, modifications,
accommodations, and/or behavioral support?
Outside IEP meetings with parents, what system do I have for informing parents of IEP goal progress?
How do I facilitate parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for the student?
How can I most effectively use my instructional assistant(s) and/or one-on-one paraprofessional(s)? What
are their responsibilities?
Who are the special education administrators in my district and what are their roles?
Is there a procedural manual for special education?
How are students referred for special education?
Where are the confidential IEP files kept?
Who do I contact to be able to access SEIS/SELPA Manager?
Have I been trained in the IEP process specific to my district/SELPA?
What other support or alternative programs are available in my district/county/SELPA and how are these
programs accessed?
Who performs Functional Behavioral Assessments and develops the Behavior Support Plan?
What are the current implications and changes to IDEA relative to my teaching?
Focus of
Inquiry #____
How I analyze assessment and performance data to determine whether to maintain, modify or change
specific instructional strategies, curricular content or adaptations, behavioral supports and/or daily
schedules to facilitate skill acquisition and successful participation for each student.
Standard 14 Common: Advanced Behavioral, Emotional, and Environmental Supports
How I implement systems that assess, plan, and provide academic and social skill instruction to
support students with complex behavioral and emotional needs.
How I work with educations, mental health, and other community resources in the ongoing process of
designing, implementing, evaluating and modifying identified supports to ensure a positive learning
environment.
CSTP 4
How I interpret, apply and disseminate current and emerging research, theory, legislation, policy and
practice.
CSTP 4
How I implement factors associated with successful planning and implementation of transitional life
experiences for students with mild/moderate/severe disabilities.
How I collaborate with personnel from other educational and community agencies to plan for
successful transition by students.
Standard 17 Common: Development of Specific Emphasis
How I am expanding the scope and depth of study in specific content areas, as well as expertise in
performing specialized functions.
Induction
Standard 5
Pedagogy
CSTP 5
How I identify, describe, select, and administer a variety of standardized and non-standardized, formal
and informal assessment procedures, and in use and interpret these in a manner that is responsive to
the cultural, socio-economic, and linguistic characteristics of individual students.
Induction
Standard 5
Pedagogy
CSTP 3 & 4
How I teach, adapt, modify and integrate curriculum appropriate to the educational needs of students
with mild/moderate disabilities.
Induction
Standard 6
Equity
How I communicate, collaborate and consult with teachers and other school personnel, community
professionals, and parents.
How I communicate relevant social, academic, and behavioral information in the areas of assessment,
curriculum, behavior management, social adjustment, and legal requirements.
How I coordinate before, during and after school special education placement.
CSTP 6
11/22/2011
Induction
Standard
6B
Special
Populations
CSTP 2
Focus of
Inquiry #____
How I analyze assessment and performance data to determine whether to maintain, modify or change
specific instructional strategies, curricular content or adaptations, behavioral supports and/or daily
schedules to facilitate skill acquisition and successful participation for each student.
How I implement systems that assess, plan, and provide academic and social skill instruction to
support students with complex behavioral and emotional needs.
How I work with educations, mental health, and other community resources in the ongoing process of
designing, implementing, evaluating and modifying identified supports to ensure a positive learning
environment.
CSTP 4
How I interpret, apply and disseminate current and emerging research, theory, legislation, policy and
practice.
CSTP 4
How I implement factors associated with successful planning and implementation of transitional life
experiences for students with mild/moderate/severe disabilities.
How I collaborate with personnel from other educational and community agencies to plan for
successful transition by students.
How I am expanding the scope and depth of study in specific content areas, as well as expertise in
performing specialized functions.
CSTP 6
CSTP 6
How I demonstrate leadership and management skills to coordinate and facilitate educational
programs, including constructing and following efficient schedules that meet individual student needs
and maximize available resources.
How I work effectively within integrated service delivery models and actively participate in school
restructuring and reform efforts to impact systems change.
11/22/2011
CSTP 6
Focus of
Inquiry #____
CSTP 6
CSTP 6
11/22/2011
Focus of
Inquiry
How I demonstrate knowledge of etiologies and cultural differences related to hearing loss
D/HH Standard 2: Development of Professional Perspectives
How I demonstrate sensitivity to and respect for varied beliefs, languages, whether signed or spoken modes of
communication, bilingualism, bilingual educational practices, parental choices, and cultural differences, including Deaf
culture
How I plan and implement instruction about the contributions of individuals and technological innovations that have
affected both deaf and hearing people
D/HH Standard 3: Candidate Communication Skills
How I use communication strategies to facilitate communication exchanges as appropriate in signed and spoken
language usage
How I ensure a comprehensible flow of academic information; develop higher-order cognitive and linguistic skills; and
develop literacy skills
D/HH Standard 4: Language and Cognitive Development Strategies
How I apply techniques to engage students in the learning process in order to develop age appropriate language and
cognitive skills. These techniques cover both visual (signed) and/or auditory (spoken) input, for students who are deaf
or hard of hearing including those who are deaf-blind with additional disabilities
D/HH Standard 5: Specialized Assessment
How I select, adapt, administer (where appropriate), interpret and explain assessments, and make recommendations
regarding services and educational progress for students who are deaf or hard of hearing, deaf-blind and/or with
additional disabilities
How I use formative and summative assessment processes and tools that are varied and strategies that involve the
communicative system of the students who are deaf or hard of hearing
D/HH Standard 6: Instructional Techniques
How I implement effective, individually designed instruction in diverse learning environments for students, ages birth
through 22, who are deaf or hard of hearing, deaf-blind and/or with additional disabilities
How I provide access to the state curriculum standards using instructional techniques (visual and/or auditory)
D/HH Standard 7: Early Childhood Intervention and Education
How I collaborate on a multi-disciplinary educational team to provide assessments, planning, and implementation
strategies for an appropriate intervention and education program for children birth to age 5 who are deaf or hard of
hearing, deaf-blind and/or with additional disabilities, and their families.
How I focus on the development of language, listening, cognitive, and social skills of my students
D/HH Standard 8: Hearing Loss and Additional Disabilities
How I identify the characteristics of students who are deaf and hard of hearing exhibiting one or more of any of the
disability categories identified in IDEA (e.g., specific learning disability, visual impairment, emotional disturbance, and
autism spectrum disorder) that are associated with hearing loss
How I identify significant behaviors that require considerations of specialized adaptations and/or modifications in the
learning process
D/HH Standard 9: Managing Student Behavior and Social Interaction Skills
How I foster appropriate student behavior patterns, social interaction skills, and self-advocacy skills
How I discriminate between behavior that is typical for various ages/stages and that behavior which might be
attributable to limited language and lack of communication access
D/HH Standard 10: Transition and Transitional Planning
How I use my knowledge of the developmental milestones as individuals move from infancy to adulthood to advocate
for the various transitions experienced by students who are D/HH, deaf-blind and/or with additional disabilities
D/HH Standard 11: Collaborative Partnerships
How I work with families, support providers (i.e. ASL/English bi-lingual specialist, audiologists, interpreters,
paraprofessionals, speech/language pathologists, and other members of the educational team), general education
professionals, community agencies, and the d/Deaf community
How I work with these individuals or agencies in meeting the academic needs of students who are Df/HH including
those who are deaf-blind and/or those with additional disabilities
11/22/2011
How I analyze assessment and performance data to determine whether to maintain, modify or change
specific instructional strategies, curricular content or adaptations, behavioral supports and/or daily
schedules to facilitate skill acquisition and successful participation for each student
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I interpret, apply and disseminate current and emerging research, theory, legislation, policy and
practice
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I implement factors associated with successful planning and implementation of transitional life
experiences for students with mild/moderate/severe disabilities
How I collaborate with personnel from other educational and community agencies to plan for successful
transition by students
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I am expanding the scope and depth of study in specific content areas, as well as expertise in
performing specialized functions
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I identify, describe, select, and administer a variety of standardized and non-standardized, formal and
informal assessment procedures, and in use and interpret these in a manner that is responsive to the
cultural, socio-economic, and linguistic characteristics of individual students
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I teach, adapt, modify and integrate curriculum appropriate to the educational needs of students with
mild/moderate disabilities
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I communicate, collaborate and consult with teachers and other school personnel, community
professionals, and parents
How I communicate relevant social, academic, and behavioral information in the areas of assessment,
curriculum, behavior management, social adjustment, and legal requirements.
How I coordinate before, during and after school special education placement
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces of
evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual
Induction Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Written Lesson
Plan
q Two Summative
Assessments of
Student Work
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation
Guide Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I analyze assessment and performance data to determine whether to maintain, modify or change
specific instructional strategies, curricular content or adaptations, behavioral supports and/or daily
schedules to facilitate skill acquisition and successful participation for each student
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I implement systems that assess, plan, and provide academic and social skill instruction to support
students with complex behavioral and emotional needs
How I work with educations, mental health, and other community resources in the ongoing process of
designing, implementing, evaluating and modifying identified supports to ensure a positive learning
environment
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I interpret, apply and disseminate current and emerging research, theory, legislation, policy and
practice
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I implement factors associated with successful planning and implementation of transitional life
experiences for students with mild/moderate/severe disabilities
How I collaborate with personnel from other educational and community agencies to plan for successful
transition by students
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I am expanding the scope and depth of study in specific content areas, as well as expertise in
performing specialized functions
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I engage in respectful collaboration, manage conflicts, supervise staff such as paraprofessionals, and
network and negotiate, including family members
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I demonstrate leadership and management skills to coordinate and facilitate educational programs,
including constructing and following efficient schedules that meet individual student needs and maximize
available resources
How I work effectively within integrated service delivery models and actively participate in school
restructuring and reform efforts to impact systems change
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I demonstrate knowledge and skills in the areas of program philosophy and goals, legal and
professional guidelines, supervision of paraprofessionals, funding resources, program monitoring
and evaluation, and community collaboration.
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I demonstrate advanced applications of emerging theory and practices, and other relevant
topics of importance to the field of early childhood special education.
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I demonstrate knowledge of etiologies and cultural differences related to hearing loss.
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I demonstrate sensitivity to and respect for varied beliefs, languages, whether signed or spoken
modes of communication, bilingualism, bilingual educational practices, parental choices, and cultural
differences, including Deaf culture
How I plan and implement instruction about the contributions of individuals and technological innovations
that have affected both deaf and hearing people
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I use communication strategies to facilitate communication exchanges as appropriate in signed and
spoken language usage
How I engage and sustain student interest in the learning process
How I ensure a comprehensible flow of academic information; develop higher-order cognitive and linguistic
skills; and develop literacy skills
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I apply techniques to engage students in the learning process in order to develop age appropriate
language and cognitive skills. These techniques cover both visual (signed) and/or auditory (spoken) input,
for students who are deaf or hard of hearing including those who are deaf-blind with additional disabilities
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I select, adapt, administer (where appropriate), interpret and explain assessments, and make
recommendations regarding services and educational progress for students who are deaf or hard of
hearing, deaf-blind and/or with additional disabilities
How I use formative and summative assessment processes and tools that are varied and strategies that
involve the communicative system of the students who are deaf or hard of hearing
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I implement effective, individually designed instruction in diverse learning environments for students,
ages birth through 22, who are deaf or hard of hearing, deaf-blind and/or with additional disabilities
How I provide access to the state curriculum standards using instructional techniques (visual and/or
auditory)
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I identify the characteristics of students who are deaf and hard of hearing exhibiting one or more of
any of the disability categories identified in IDEA (e.g., specific learning disability, visual impairment,
emotional disturbance, and autism spectrum disorder) that are associated with hearing loss
How I identify significant behaviors that require considerations of specialized adaptations and/or
modifications in the learning process
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces
of evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual Induction
Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation Guide
Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I foster appropriate student behavior patterns, social interaction skills, and self-advocacy skills
How I discriminate between behavior that is typical for various ages/stages and that behavior which might
be attributable to limited language and lack of communication access
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces of
evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual
Induction Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Written Lesson
Plan
q Two Summative
Assessments of
Student Work
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation
Guide Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I use my knowledge of the developmental milestones as individuals move from infancy to adulthood to
advocate for the various transitions experienced by students who are deaf or hard of hearing, deaf-blind
and/or with additional disabilities
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces of
evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual
Induction Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Written Lesson
Plan
q Two Summative
Assessments of
Student Work
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation
Guide Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
How I work collaboratively with families, support providers (i.e. ASL/English bi-lingual specialist,
audiologists, interpreters, paraprofessionals, speech/language pathologists, and other members of the
educational team), general education professionals, community agencies, and the d/Deaf community
How I work with these individuals or agencies in meeting the academic needs of students who are deaf or
hard of hearing, including those who are deaf-blind and/or those with additional disabilities
After reviewing all Inquiry documents and evidence, select, and describe below, 3 pieces of
evidence that best demonstrate how you have met the standard.
Source: ____________________________
q Class Profile
q Focus Student
Selection
q Descriptions of
Practice
q Individual
Induction Plan
q SP Observation
Record Form
q PT Observation of
Colleague
Source: ____________________________
q Action Plan
q Linked Series of
Lessons
q Written Lesson
Plan
q Two Summative
Assessments of
Student Work
q Focus Student
Reflection
q Conversation
Guide Notes
q Other:
Source: ____________________________
Contact Person:
Kevin Schaefer, Program Specialist
(916) 686-7780
kschaefe@egusd.net
Current Legal and Ethical Considerations for Educating Children with ASD (8 hrs)
Contact Person:
Executive Functioning: Helping Students Learn How to Learn (6 hrs) Presented by Diann Grimm and
Jennifer Simmons
Participants will learn to:
Define the skills and behaviors associated with executive functioning
Understand executive functioning from a developmental perspective and recognize deficits in
students
Appreciate the executive functioning demands of class work and homework
Utilize strategies to assist students with executive functioning deficits
Provide a classroom environment that promotes effective executive functioning for all
students.
Vinceena Irgens
Vinceena.irgens@ycoe.org
Fax number (530) 668-3827
Registration Cost: $50
A light lunch/ materials provided
Contact Person:
Deanna Santana
(530) 295-2478
dsantana@edcoe.org
Contact Person:
Kevin Schaefer, Program Specialist
(916) 686-7780
kschaefe@egusd.net
Contact Person:
Randy McKeen
(530) 265-0611 ext 203
Randy.cm@nevco.k12.ca.us
Have a deeper understanding of the needs of students with moderate to severe Intellectual
Disabilities in preschool-eighth grade programs
Contact Person:
Tom Neary
(530) 745-1352
Contact Person:
Vinceena Irgens
Vinceena.irgens@ycoe.org
Fax number (530) 668-3827
Registration Cost: $50
A light lunch/ materials provided
Promoting Social Competence: Effective Intervention Strategies (6hrs) Presented by Diann Grimm &
Phoebe Howard
Participants will learn to:
Clarify the difference between behavior problems and social skill deficits
Contact Person:
Deanna Santana
(530) 295-2478
dsantana@edcoe.org
Contact Person:
Nancy Nos
(916) 566-1600 ext 1219
Nancy.nos@twinriversusd.org
Contact Person:
Valerie Callori
(916) 635-2802 ext 209
vcallori@fcusd.org
Asperger Syndrome: Understanding and Addressing the Complexities and Subtleties Day 1 (6 hrs)
Presented by Diann Grimm
Participants will:
Learn a number of intervention techniques and educational strategies for children and
adolescents with Asperger Syndrome
Contact Person:
Tom Neary
(530) 745-1352
Applied Behavior Analysis Methods for Skills Teaching in the Classroom (8 hrs)
This training provides participants with a general understanding of applied behavior analysis principles
and how they can be applied to the teaching of various skills to students in the school setting. The use
of appropriate cues, prompting, reinforcement, error correction and generalization are covered. Various
teaching methods including whole task, partial task, discrete trial teaching and incidental teaching will
be covered.
Contact Person:
Tom Neary
(530) 745-1352
Contact Person:
Vinceena Irgens
Vinceena.irgens@ycoe.org
Fax number (530) 668-3827
Registration Cost: $50
A light lunch/ materials provided
Contact Person:
Tom Neary
(530) 745-1352
Contact Person:
Vinceena Irgens
Vinceena.irgens@ycoe.org
Fax number (530) 668-3827
Registration Cost: $50
A light lunch/ materials provided
Contact Person:
Deanna Santana
(530) 295-2478
dsantana@edcoe.org
Straight Talk About Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence-based Instruction (6hrs)
Presented by Shari Gent
Participants will:
Learn effective strategies for universal, small group and individual settings.
Structured Teaching Model (Based on TEACCH) (8 hrs)
Participants will be taught how to effectively use visual strategies and structure in order to increase a
students willingness and ability to follow instructions, participate in independent work, and complete
complex routines within the school setting. The principles of TEACCH will be covered.
Teaching Students with Moderate to Severe Intellectual Disabilities (6hrs)
Presented by Ann England and Rebecca Steinberger
Participants will:
Have a deeper understanding of the needs of students with moderate to severe Intellectual
Disabilities in preschool-eighth grade programs
Contact Person:
Vinceena Irgens
Vinceena.irgens@ycoe.org
Fax number (530) 668-3827
Registration Cost: $50
A light lunch/ materials provided
Contact Person:
Valerie Callori
(916) 635-2802 ext 209
vcallori@fcusd.org
Best Practice Strategies for Successful Inclusion Experiences for Children on the Autism Spectrum (8
hrs)
Participants will develop a better understanding of Autism and the specific differences that may affect
the students ability to learn in an inclusive setting. Appropriate classroom adaptations,
accommodations, modifications and compensatory skills teaching will be presented as well as user
friendly tools for assessing student behavior and collecting data/monitoring progress on IEP goals and
objectives.
Contact Person:
Vinceena Irgens
Vinceena.irgens@ycoe.org
Fax number (530) 668-3827
Registration Cost: $50
A light lunch/ materials provided
Best Practices for Increasing Play and Social Understanding in Children with ASD (8 hrs)
Participants will gain an understanding of social-cognitive impairments and effective strategies for
teaching play, social skills, and social understanding. Strategies for increasing play (with objects and
peers) will be presented. Strategies will include: direct instruction, pivotal response training, integrated
play groups, and awareness activities.
Contact Person:
Vinceena Irgens
Vinceena.irgens@ycoe.org
Fax number (530) 668-3827
Registration Cost: $50
A light lunch/ materials provided
INCOMPLETE
Overall
Organization
Comments:
COMPLETE
OUTSTANDING
Portfolio is loosely
organized
Sequence of materials
confusing and many not
match standards
Evidence is relevant to
the standards addressed
Portfolio is highly
organized
Appears to be hastily
prepared
No explanation as to the
relevance of artifacts
selected for inclusion
Materials inappropriate
or missing
No evidence of self
evaluation leading to
modifications of practice
Standards
Self-Reflection
Incomplete
Complete
Outstanding
Name
Position
Hammer, Pat
Regional Director
Schmidt, Diana
Program Manager
Souza, Kaelin
Academic Advisor
916-789-6904
souza@brandman.edu
Roznos, Bonita
Campus Director
916-789-6900
roznos@brandman.edu
Lind, Angie
530-295-2306
alind@edcoe.org
Revis, Jodi
Coordinator
916-686-7797
x7322
jrevis@egusd.net
Mendoza, Cara
Coordinator
707-399-5076
CaraM@fsusd.k12.ca.u
s
National University
Hexom, Denise
916-855-4314
dhexom@nu.edu
Shepherd, Carol
916-855-4115
cshepher@nu.edu
Edwards, Lucy
Director
707-253-6998
Jones, Roni
Director
530-745-1490
Fortune, Margaret
President/CEO
924-86330.
Nisonger, Susan
916-924-8633
Brandman University
Fortune School of
Education
Sacramento City USD
BTSA
Dunkley, Kelly
Sacramento COE
BTSA
Sacramento State
University
Director
916-228-2236
mdill@scoe.net
916-278-5088
vsheared@saclink.csus
.edu
Norman, Kathy
916-278-4187
knorman@csus.edu
Ostertag, Bruce
916-278-5541
ostertag@csus.edu
Johnson, Rita
916-278-6155
rjohnson@csus.edu
Sessoms, Deidre
916-278-4267
sessoms@csus.edu
Heredia, Susan
916-278-6807
heredias@csus.edu
916-704-5513
cell
williamst@csus.edu
916-278-4804
mayl@csus.edu
916-278-3349
nleung@csus.edu
916-971-7216
glynn.thompson@sanju
an.edu
Dultz, Cheryl
BTSA Coordinator
916-979-8793
cdultz@sanjuan.edu
McLaughlin,
Karen
530-822-2972
Goldman, Barbara
530-752-5395
Holmes, Pauline
530-752-9537
May, Lori
Leung, Noue
Tri-County BTSA
916-643-2156
ledwards@ncoe.k12.ca
.us
rjones@placercoe.k12.
ca.us
mfortune@projectpipeli
ne.org
snisonger@projectpipel
ine.org
kdunkley@saccity.k12.ca.us
Sheared, Vanessa
Williams, Thomas
Sac. State College of
Continuing Ed.
UC Davis
karenh@sutter.k12.ca.
us
bggoldman@ucdavis.e
du
pvholmes@ucdavis.ed
u
Catron, Susan
UC Davis, Extension
Ruano, Sarah
Ryan, Amy
530-754-9158
ssruano@ucdavis.edu
530-757-8864
aryan@ucde.ucdavis.e
du
kelly.smith2@phoenix.
edu
patricia.wick@phoenix.
edu
Smith, Kelly
916-286-2869
Wick, Patricia
916-286-2852
Shinn, Barbara
916-624-5641
bshinn@sbcglobal.net
Bull, Eric
916-577-2278
ebull@jessup.edu
Gillespie, Tim
916-577-2279
tgillespie@jessup.edu
Herzog, Nathan
916-577-2284
nherzog@jessup.edu
Campbell, Lynette
BTSA Coordinator
916-375-7604
x1104
Best, Connie
BTSA Director
530-757-5300
x183
University of Phoenix
University of
San Diego
scatron@ucdavis.edu
lcampbell@wusd.k12.ca.
us
cbest@djusd.k12.ca.u
s
10/6/09
7HDFKHU3UHSDUDWLRQ6WDQGDUG3UHSDUDWLRQWR7HDFK6SHFLDO3RSXODWLRQVLQWKH*HQHUDO(GXFDWLRQ&ODVVURRP
7HDFKHU3UHSDUDWLRQ6WDQGDUG3UHSDUDWLRQWR7HDFK(QJOLVK/HDUQHUV
7HDFKHU3UHSDUDWLRQ6WDQGDUG/HDUQLQJWR&UHDWHD6XSSRUWLYH+HDOWK\(QYLURQPHQWIRU6WXGHQW/HDUQLQJ
7HDFKHU3UHSDUDWLRQ6WDQGDUG8VLQJ&RPSXWHU%DVHG7HFKQRORJ\LQWKH&ODVVURRP
7HDFKHU3UHSDUDWLRQ6WDQGDUG3HGDJRJLFDO3UHSDUDWLRQIRU6XEMHFW6SHFLF&RQWHQW,QVWUXFWLRQ
7HDFKHU3UHSDUDWLRQ6WDQGDUG(TXLW\'LYHUVLW\DQG$FFHVVWRWKH&RUH&XUULFXOXP
73(3URIHVVLRQDO*URZWK
73(3URIHVVLRQDO/HJDODQG
(WKLFDO2EOLJDWLRQV
73(6RFLDO(QYLURQPHQW
73(,QVWUXFWLRQDO7LPH
73(,QVWUXFWLRQDO3ODQQLQJ
73(/HDUQLQJDERXW6WXGHQWV
73(7HDFKLQJ(QJOLVK/HDUQHUV
73('HYHORSPHQWDOO\
$SSURSULDWHWHDFKLQJ3UDFWLFHV
73(6WXGHQW(QJDJHPHQW
73(0DNLQJ&RQWHQW$FFHVVLEOH
73(,QWHUSUHWDWLRQDQG8VHRI
$VVHVVPHQW
73(0RQLWRULQJ6WXGHQW
/HDUQLQJ'XULQJ,QVWUXFWLRQ
73(6SHFLF3HGDJRJLFDO6NLOOV
IRU6XEMHFW0DWWHU,QVWUXFWLRQ
Teacher Preparation
'RPDLQ)
'HYHORSLQJDVD
3URIHVVLRQDO(GXFDWRU
'RPDLQ(
$VVHVVLQJ6WXGHQWV
IRU/HDUQLQJ
'RPDLQ'
3ODQQLQJ,QVWUXFWLRQ
DQG'HVLJQLQJ
/HDUQLQJ([SHULHQFHV
IRU$OO6WXGHQWV
'RPDLQ&
(QJDJLQJDQG
6XSRUWLQJ6WXGHQWV
LQ/HDUQLQJ
'RPDLQ%
$VVHVVLQJ6WXGHQW
/HDUQLQJ
'RPDLQ$
0DNLQJ
6XEMHFW0DWWHU
&RPSUHKHQVLEOH
WR6WXGHQWV
7HDFKLQJ3HUIRUPDQFH$VVHVVPHQW
&673
'HYHORSLQJDVD
3URIHVVLRQDO(GXFDWRU
&673
$VVHVVLQJ6WXGHQWV
IRU/HDUQLQJ
&673
3ODQQLQJ,QVWUXFWLRQ
DQG'HVLJQLQJ
/HDUQLQJ([SHULHQFHV
IRU$OO6WXGHQWV
&673
8QGHUVWDQGLQJDQG
2UJDQL]LQJ6XEMHFW
0DWWHUIRU6WXGHQW
/HDUQLQJ
&673
&UHDWLQJDQG
0DLQWDLQLQJ(IIHFWLYH
(QYLURQPHQWVIRU
6WXGHQW/HDUQLQJ
&673
(QJDJLQJDQG
6XSSRUWLQJ$OO
6WXGHQWVLQ/HDUQLQJ
'HPRQVWUDWLQJSURIHVVLRQDOUHVSRQVLELOLW\
0DQDJLQJSURIHVVLRQDOUHVSRQVLELOLWLHVWR
(QJDJLQJORFDOFRPPXQLWLHVWRVXSSRUWVWXGHQW
:RUNLQJZLWKIDPLOLHVWRVXSSRUWVWXGHQW
&ROODERUDWLQJZLWKFROOHDJXHVDQGWKHEURDGHU
(VWDEOLVKLQJSURIHVVLRQDOJRDOVDQGHQJDJLQJ
5HHFWLQJRQWHDFKLQJSUDFWLFHLQVXSSRUWRI
8VLQJDVVHVVPHQWLQIRUPDWLRQWRVKDUHWLPHO\
8VLQJDYDLODEOHWHFKQRORJLHVWRDVVLVWLQ
,QYROYLQJDOOVWXGHQWVLQVHOIDVVHVVPHQWJRDO
8VLQJDVVHVVPHQWGDWDWRHVWDEOLVKOHDUQLQJ
5HYLHZLQJGDWDERWKLQGLYLGXDOO\DQGZLWK
&ROOHFWLQJDQGDQDO\]LQJDVVHVVPHQWGDWDIURP
$SSO\LQJNQRZOHGJHRIWKHSXUSRVHV
$GDSWLQJLQVWUXFWLRQDOSODQVDQGFXUULFXODU
3ODQQLQJLQVWUXFWLRQDOSODQVDQGFXUULFXODU
'HYHORSLQJDQGVHTXHQFLQJORQJWHUPDQG
(VWDEOLVKLQJDQGDUWLFXODWLQJJRDOVIRUVWXGHQW
8VLQJNQRZOHGJHRIVWXGHQWVDFDGHPLF
$GGUHVVLQJWKHQHHGVRI(QJOLVKOHDUQHUVDQG
8VLQJDQGDGDSWLQJUHVRXUFHVWHFKQRORJLHV
8WLOL]LQJLQVWUXFWLRQDOVWUDWHJLHVWKDWDUH
2UJDQL]LQJFXUULFXOXPWRIDFLOLWDWHVWXGHQW
$SSO\LQJNQRZOHGJHRIVWXGHQWGHYHORSPHQW
'HPRQVWUDWLQJNQRZOHGJHRIVXEMHFWPDWWHU
8VLQJLQVWUXFWLRQDOWLPHWRRSWLPL]HOHDUQLQJ
(PSOR\LQJFODVVURRPURXWLQHVSURFHGXUHV
'HYHORSLQJFRPPXQLFDWLQJDQG
&UHDWLQJDULJRURXVOHDUQLQJHQYLURQPHQW
(VWDEOLVKLQJDQGPDLQWDLQLQJOHDUQLQJ
&UHDWLQJSK\VLFDORUYLUWXDOOHDUQLQJ
3URPRWLQJVRFLDOGHYHORSPHQWDQG
0RQLWRULQJVWXGHQWOHDUQLQJDQGDGMXVWLQJ
3URPRWLQJFULWLFDOWKLQNLQJWKURXJKLQTXLU\
8VLQJDYDULHW\RILQVWUXFWLRQDOVWUDWHJLHV
&RQQHFWLQJVXEMHFWPDWWHUWRPHDQLQJIXOUHDO
&RQQHFWLQJOHDUQLQJWRVWXGHQWVSULRU
8VLQJNQRZOHGJHRIVWXGHQWVWRHQJDJHWKHPLQ
Induction
,QGXFWLRQ3URJUDP6WDQGDUG8QLYHUVDO$FFHVV(TXLW\IRU$OO6WXGHQWV
D7HDFKLQJ(QJOLVK/HDUQHUV
E7HDFKLQJ6SHFLDO3RSXODWLRQV
,QGXFWLRQ3URJUDP6WDQGDUG3HGDJRJ\
BTSATeacherInductionBudget
Fall2014
SupportProviderStipends
BudgetClarifications
Natomas
GaltHigh
Robla
Center
GaltElementary
FolsomCordova
Eureka
Rocklin
TwinRivers
RiverDelta
Elverta
GaltHigh
NAEF
PacificCharter
GatewayCharter
Muir
ACSI
CMP
EFC
SacramentoCountyOfficeof
Education
1800perteacher
1400perteacher
1800perteacher
2000perteacher
1500perteacher
1500perteacher,1000,800,4
andover=800(slidingscale)
2616perperson,4360for2
1000perteacher
2200perteacher
1500perteacher,1000(sliding
scale)
1500perteacher
1400perteacher
1800perteacher
1500perteacher
1850perteacher
2000perteacher
BradshawChristian$1250per
PT
FresnoChristian$1500perPT
KermanChristian$1500
ValleyChristian(outside
contractorcurrently$65per
hour)(ThiswoulddependonSP
andexperience)
1500perteacher
3000perteacher
1PT:$1500
2PT:$2800
3PT:$3900
Inteachercontract(10Yrs)
Separatecontract(12Yrs)
Inteachercontract
Notincontract
Notincontract(8yrs)
Notincontract
Inteachercontract
Notincontract
Inteachercontract
Inteachercontract
Notincontract
Inteachercontract
Nocontract
NoContract
NoContract
NoContract
NoContract
NoContract
NoContract
NoContract
4300
5600
5800
SuppliesopenP.O.toOfficeDepot,workshops,officesupplies,booksforparticipants
Rental/repairscopymachine
Catering(Hannibals),NAEFMOU
B.
Responsibilities - Fiscal
A. SCOE, in its capacity as LEA, agrees to the following:
1. Overall fiscal responsibility for the administration of the Induction Program.
2. Develop and maintain a balanced budget that allocates amounts sufficient to meet the costs of implementing program
responsibilities as described in the Sacramento County BTSA Consortium Induction Program Plan.
3. Expend income according to regularly established policies and procedures within the BTSA expenditure guidelines.
B. The Partner Program agrees to the following:
1. Pay $1800 cost for service per year of a two year Induction Program by either the partner program or the individual
credential candidate.
2. Develop and maintain a BTSA budget which includes these suggested expenditures: a program coordinator, support
providers, materials/supplies, and substitutes (for classroom observations).
3. Provide a Support Provider to serve eligible credential candidate(s) in the Induction Program.
Other Conditions
Any and all products developed by SCBTSA are the exclusive property of the Sacramento County Office of Education. School
districts, their employees, staff, and subcontractors shall not have the right to disseminate, market or otherwise use the products
without the expressed written permission of SCOE and the Consortium. SCOE and SCBTSA shall have the authority to adapt and
adopt materials developed by SCBTSA for dissemination purposes.
Pursuant to Education Code Section 44227(a) the Sacramento County BTSA Induction Program adheres to the General Preconditions
(requirements 1-10) established by the Commission on Teacher Credentialing. In addition to the Commissions ten General
Preconditions, pursuant to Education Code Sections 44227(a) and 44265, each Education Specialist Clear Credential preparation
program shall also adhere to requirements 11-16.
General Indemnity. Partner Program shall defend, save, hold harmless, and indemnify SCOE and its officers, employees, and
agents from and against all claims, suits, actions, losses, damages, liabilities, costs, and expenses resulting from the gross negligence
of the Partner Program, its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents under this Contract. SCOE shall defend, save, hold
harmless, and indemnify the Partner Program and its officers, employees, and agents from and against all claims, suits, actions,
losses, damages, liabilities, costs, and expenses resulting from the gross negligence of SCOE, its officers, employees, subcontractors,
or agents under this Contract.
By:__________________________________________
Signature of Authorized Official
Sacramento County Office of Education
By:__________________________________________
Signature of Authorized Official
Partner Program
Title: ________________________________________
Page 2 of 2
Memorandum of Understanding
Self-Funded Candidates
General
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered between the Sacramento County Office of Education
(SCOE), Local Education Agency for the Sacramento Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA)
Consortium, and the Non-funded Candidate.
Purpose
The purpose of the MOU is to establish a formal working relationship between the parties to this agreement and to
set forth the operative conditions, which will govern participation in the SCOE BTSA Induction Program.
Responsibilities - General
A. SCOE agrees to provide the following:
1. An approved credential program leading to a recommendation for a Clear Credential
2. Individual counseling and advisement services as requested
3. Five days of Support Provider Training for a site-identified mentor
4. Access to workshops and online professional development options
5. All materials and resources
6. Access to an orientation, four Benchmark Support Seminars, and an End-of-Year Event (Professional
Induction Presentation)
B.
Responsibilities - Fiscal
The amount due to SCOE: $1700 per year (plus $400 if SCOE provides the Support Provider)
Site Provides an SP
SCOE Provides an SP
I understand that my credential will not be cleared until the Sacramento County Office of Education has
received payment in full.
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________
Title: ________________________________________
Signature of Candidate
Date: _________________________________________
InquirybasedFormativeAssessmentModel
IndividualInductionPlanProcess
PLAN
DataGathering
ContextforTeachingCurrentTeachingAssignment
InitialSelfAssessmentofPriorExperiences
SelfAssessmentofCurrentPracticebasedonCSTP
ActionPlan
CollaborationwithSP
Conferences
StaffDevelopment
Articles
ObservingColleagues
EssentialComponents/TeachingPlan
TeachingPlanalignedtoP12
CommonCore
ObservationbasedonCSTP
AnalysisofStudentWork
Assessmenttoolwith
multiplemeasuresofpractice
CollaborativeReflection
SummaryofTeachingPractice
Analysisofprofessionalgrowthon
o instructionalpracticeand
o studentachievement
Indicationsforfuturepractice
STUDY/ACT
REFLECT/APPLY
TEACH
DO
ProfessionalDevelopmentActivities
Attend a minimum of one-half day BTSA Site Administrator Training and periodic
informational meetings
Keep informed about the activities and requirements of the BTSA program
Inform all eligible new hires at your site of BTSA program responsibilities prior to the first
working day or within two weeks of hire
Ensure that your District Coordinator knows the names of your new hires within two weeks
Place eligible new hires in a position for optimum success according to the Professional
Teacher Induction Standards
Orient Participating Teachers by introducing them to the staff and learning community, and
informing them about site resources, personnel, procedures, and policies
Assist participating teacher by completing a Site Orientation Checklist that will document
that they have received information regarding local policies and state and federal regulations
related to student health and safety
Communicate regularly with your District BTSA Coordinator
Contact your BTSA Coordinator if your Participating Teacher/Support Provider match is not
working successfully
Provide and document additional support to those Participating Teachers placed in
challenging working conditions
Encourage and support a consistently established time for your Participating Teacher and
Support Provider to work together on a weekly basis
Facilitate the participation of your Participating Teachers in professional development
activities that support their individual needs as identified through formative assessment
processes
Monitor progress of Participating Teachers toward completion of credential requirements by
reviewing periodic status reports from your District Coordinator
Provide necessary release time for Support Providers to attend required training (5 full days)
as well as a minimum of two half-days per year of release time for Support Providers to
observe and meet with Participating Teachers
Respect and maintain the confidentiality between Participating Teachers and their Support
Providers
Understand and agree that the activities of the BTSA program can play no part in the formal
evaluation process of any Participating Teacher
I understand and will effectively fulfill the role and responsibilities of a BTSA Site Administrator.
_______________________________________________________________
Signature
SacramentoBTSAConsortium
CHECKINWITHSITEADMINISTRATOR
(ToincludetheParticipatingTeacherandtheSupportProvider)
Itisimportantthatthesiteadministratorunderstandsandsupportstheworkoftheparticipatingteacher.Weare
encouragingallBTSAparticipantstoengageinatleastoneCheckInperyear.SupportProvidersshouldhelpschedule
anappointmentwiththesiteadministratortoreviewtheworkthatyourparticipatingteacherisengagedinthisyear.
TalkingPointsforyourmeeting:
Keylearningssofarthisyear
Areasofstrength(aslinkedtotheCaliforniaStandardsfortheTeachingProfession)
Areasofstrength(aslinkedtotheInductionStandards)
WaysprofessionaldevelopmenthasimpactedSTUDENTACHIEVEMENT
Additionalprofessionaldevelopmentandsupportnecessarytobettermeetstudentneeds
Herearesomepointstoconsider
Rememberthattheworkofeachparticipatingteacherisconfidential!TheprocessofInductionandtheevidence
gatheredareformative,notevaluative.SupportProviderscangentlyremindadministratorsofthisfact.However,
participatingteachershavetheoptiontoshareasmuchoftheirformativeassessmentactivitieswiththeirsite
administratorasdesired!
Sincesiteadministratorsaregenuinelyinterestedinthekindsofactivitiesparticipatingteachersarecompleting,and
sincetheyshouldunderstandthecomponentsoftheprogram,wesuggestthatyousharesamplesfromtheFACTUsers
GuideforreviewaswellastheDescriptionsofPracticeandCSTPbooklet.
Assistthesiteadministratorinunderstandingthevariouscomponentsoftheprogram,highlightingthelinkstothe
CaliforniaStandardsfortheTeachingProfession,theInductionStandards,andtostudentachievement.
Siteadministratorsareverybusy.Pleasetrytoscheduleanappointmentratherthanjustdroppingin.Pickatimethat
willallowasrelaxedanenvironmentaspossibleinordertoemphasizethepositivesuccessesoftheparticipating
teacher.
Inlargeschools,thismaybeoneofthefewopportunitiesateacherhastohighlighthis/herstrengthsinaprivate
settingwithanadministrator.SupportProvidersshouldtaketimetohelpwiththepreparationofthismeeting.
AdaptedfromtheNorthCoastBeginningTeacherProgram
9/3/08
School:
DIRECTIONS: A professional educators knowledge of the policies and procedures at their site/assignment is important.
This list of discussion topics will help you understand your local teaching context. In a meeting with your administrator or
designee, discuss each of these items and obtain your administrators signature. If your school/district provides this
information in another format, you may attach it.
Staff Information
Staff Roster
Staff Responsibilities
Intervention Programs
(Conflict Resolution, Bullying, Multi-tiered system
of support)
Emergency Procedures
School Information
School Policies
Homework Policy
Attendance Procedures
Hours to be on Campus
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 7
Page 2 of 7
Page 3 of 7
Application Form
PRINT YOUR TIMELINE FOR THE APPLICATION PROCESS
2. CREDENTIALS
District
School
a. ________________________________________
Grade
Subject(s)
b.___ ______________________________
Degree
Dates
Major/Minor
Please attach the answers to the following questions to your application packet.
4. How do you stay current on new developments in instruction or the content area in which you teach? How do you
self-assess and document your professional growth?
Within this question please address your knowledge of the state-adopted academic content and standards and performance
levels for students, state-adopted curriculum frameworks and instructional materials, and the California Standards for the
Teaching Profession; your willingness to participate in professional training to acquire the knowledge and skills needed to be
an effective support provider; and your commitment to personal professional growth and learning.
5. Describe your experiences, if any, in supervision of student teachers, peer coaching, team leadership (site or
district) or similar.
Within this question please address your willingness to share instructional ideas and materials with participating teachers; your
willingness to deepen their understanding of cultural, ethnic, cognitive, linguistic, and gender diversity; and your knowledge
of beginning teacher development.
6. Describe your familiarity with and willingness to engage in formative assessment processes, including nonevaluative, reflective conversations about formative assessment evidence with participating teachers.
7. What are your strengths as a teacher?
Within this question please address your effectiveness with interpersonal and communication skills; your willingness to work
with participating teachers; your willingness and ability to be an excellent professional role model; and your ability to use
excellent oral and written communication skills and your ability to work with adult learners.
8. A. In what ways would you be effective in the role of support provider?
9. References: Please list three professional references, including your current principal.
Name
Phone No.
School
Position
Reference forms are attached to this packet. Please have these individuals complete them and return them to ___
Applicants Statement
I would like to participate in the Sacramento BTSA Program through the (NAME OF DISTRICT). I have read the
Roles and Responsibilities of a Support Provider and agree to fulfill them.
Signature_________________________________________________________
Date_________
Page 4 of 7
Name of Candidate:
____________________________________________________
School:
____________________________________________________
Grade Level/Subject:
____________________________________________________
Credential(s) Held:
____________________________________________________
It is crucial that administrators support and understand the roles and responsibilities of the Support Provider. Support
Providers will only be successful if they are highly qualified and are available to meet the needs of the Participating Teacher
to which they are assigned. Additional assignments beyond the support provider position need to be feasible to the extent that
the individual can effectively meet the expectations and demands of the support provider position.
I have read and understand the attached Roles and Responsibilities of Support Providers and the Characteristics of Effective
Support Providers and understand the requirements and commitment needed in order to be a successful Support Provider. I
also understand my role in selecting and supporting highly qualified support providers at my site
I verify that the above named candidate for support provider has at least five years of exemplary teaching experience and
meets the selection guidelines.
Only support providers who are successful as measured by multiple sources of evidence including feedback from the
site administrator and participating teachers will be retained in the program.
____________________________________________________
Date:
____________________________________________________
Page 5 of 7
Page 6 of 7
Interview Questions
2. Tell us about how you use the tools of reflective practice (self-assessment, inquiry based on evidence of
student work, reflective writing, portfolios, etc.) to inform and enhance your work as a teacher.
3. Describe an incident or situation in which you provided professional assistance to a colleague. How did
you know it was successful?
4. Think for a moment about your first year as a teacher. Tell us about two or three critical concerns of
participating teachers. What support would you recommend be provided to assist in the professional
development of beginning teachers?
5. Some participants in the BTSA Induction Program are not beginning teachers, but have some years of
experience. How would you determine appropriate program adjustments for this individual?
6. Do you have any concerns or hesitations about monitoring the professional progress of a colleague and
providing feedback to that individual?
7. Describe your ability to participate in extensive training activities and consortium-wide events,
including summer institutes?
Page 7 of 7
Know teacher development and the research base that informs induction content
and practices.
Know and address the issues and impact regarding culture, ethnicity, and diversity
(language/linguistic, cognitive, and gender)
Deliver high quality services for which you have been contracted.
__________________________
Date
___________________________________________
Print Name
_______________________
District
Experienced
SP
TASKS
Induction Advisement
for Support Providers
Credential Roles and Responsibilities
SP
Up
Date
SP
Training
days
Sept. Oct.,
Nov.,
Dec., Jan.
Inquiry
Observation (Practice)
Reflection and Application (Practice)
Benchmarks
Super Sat.
PIP
Summer
Training
Credentialing 101
Activities/Strategies (Teach Like a Champion, 50
Strategies)
Skill Building
Credentialing 101
Activities/Strategies (Teach Like a
Champion, 50 Strategies)
Skill Building
Cognitive Coaching
Mentoring Matters
Problem Solving
MyBTSA assistance
Cognitive Coaching
Mentoring Matters
Problem Solving
Inquiry Facilitation
Inquiry Facilitation
Credentialing/FACT
AdultLearning
UnderpinningsofBTSA
Assessment/Evidence
Coaching101
My BTSA assistance
Orientation: Introduction to
BTSA
Developing as a Professional Educator
Expectations and Credential
Responsibilities
Overview: Inquiry Cycle, CSTP and
Induction Standards
Entry Assessment Activity
o Teacher Preparation and Induction
Alignment Discussion
o Begin an Investigation of
Professional Practice: CSTP 2
Benchmark #1
REVIEW:
Orientation
Review the orientation documents: 1) Quickstart, 2)
Teacher Preparation and Induction Alignment
documents 3) 2014 Combined CSTPs/CTP
(referred to as the CTP)
REVIEW:
Benchmark #1
Be sure that you have set up times for your preobservation, and post observation.
Benchmark #2
Benchmark #4
Benchmark #3
REVIEW:
Benchmark #4
Revisit the Conversation Guides for Pedagogy
and Equity during the weekly conversations
continuing to note key insights.
PREVIEW and PREPARATION for End-of Year Event
Check that your PT has uploaded one Inquiry
Cycle and thorough and thoughtful selfassessments for Pedagogy and Equity to
MyBTSA.
EndofYear
Yr. 1
o One Inquiry Cycle
oInduction Standards
Self-Assessments
o Pedagogy and
Equity
o Culminating
Questions and
Reflections Guide
Benchmark #1
Developing as a Professional
Educator
Expectations and Credential
Responsibilities
Review: Inquiry Cycle, CSTP
and Induction Standards
CTP
Entry Assessment Activity: SelfAssessment Reflective
Conversation Record
REVIEW:
Orientation
Review the
orientation
documents:
1) Quickstart
2) 2014 CSTPs/CTP
3) Self-Assessment
Reflection Conversation Record
REVIEW:
Benchmark #1
Be sure that your PT has based selfassessments on cited evidence and has
uploaded the initial self-assessments to
MyBTSA.
Benchmark #2
REVIEW:
Benchmark #2
Review
Inquiry Cycle
o IIP
o Essential Components for
Instruction
o Entry Level Assessment
o Focus Student Selection
o Lesson Plans
o Observation
o Analysis/Summative Assessment of
Student Work
directions and
forms included
in the
Inquiry cycle to
be sure you understand the purpose and role of
each form in supporting the inquiry process.
Benchmark #4
Review of
Benchmark #4
Check that your PT has uploaded selected
documents from both Inquiry Cycles and has
uploaded thorough and thoughtful selfassessments for Pedagogy and Equity to
MyBTSA.
PREVIEW and PREPARATION for End-of Year Event
Read the directions for the Culminating
Questions and Reflections Guide.
Use the suggested questions to help your PT
synthesize progress towards meeting
professional growth goals.
Benchmark #3
Inquiry Cycle
o IIP
o Essential Components for
Instruction
o Entry Level Assessment
o Focus Student Selection
o Lesson Plans
o Observation
o Analysis/Summative
Assessment of Student
Work
REVIEW:
Benchmark #3
Revisit the
Conversation Guides for English Learners
EndofYear
Yr. 2
o Two Inquiry Cycles
o Induction Standards SelfAssessments
Pedagogy
Equity
English Learners
Sp. Populations
o Culminating
Questions and
Reflections Guide
SCOE Events
Add or update events by clicking a link below. By default, upcoming events and those requiring
attendance will be listed. To narrow or expand the list, search at right or choose to Show All
Events.
Add a New SCOE Event
Date
8/6/13
8/6/13
8/10/13
8/20/13
8/21/13
8/21/13
8/23/13
8/26/13
8/28/13
8/29/13
8/29/13
9/4/13
9/4/13
9/7/13
9/9/13
9/9/13
9/12/13
9/16/13
9/16/13
9/16/13
9/17/13
Event Name
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Special Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Update for Returning Support Providers
Coordinator/SCOE Planning Meeting
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Special Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Oakland Orientation
Update for Returning Support Providers
Update for Returning Support Providers
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Special Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Special Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Update for Returning Support Providers
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Special Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Oakland SP Update
Special Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
John Muir Orientation
John Muir SP Support
Status
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Date
9/18/13
9/21/13
9/21/13
9/21/13
10/1/13
10/2/13
10/3/13
10/7/13
10/8/13
10/10/13
10/11/13
10/14/13
10/17/13
10/22/13
10/24/13
10/24/13
10/29/13
10/31/13
11/2/13
11/2/13
11/2/13
11/2/13
11/2/13
11/2/13
11/2/13
11/2/13
11/2/13
Event Name
New Support Providers: FACT Training Day 1
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Update for Returning Support Providers
Education Specialist Support Saturday 1
Home School Teachers Meeting
Benchmark Seminar #1
Benchmark Seminar #1
Benchmark Seminar #1
Oakland EFC Benchmark #1
Coordinator/SCOE Planning Retreat Day 1
Coordinator/SCOE Planning Retreat Day 2
Benchmark Seminar #1
Benchmark Seminar #1
New Support Providers: FACT Training Day 2
Benchmark Seminar #1
Oakland EFC Benchmark #1
Benchmark Seminar #1
Home School Teachers Meeting
November 2 Saturday: Engaging Students
Across the Digital Spectrum AM Level 1
(Beginner/Intermediate)
November 2 Saturday: Introduction to the
ELA/Literacy Common Core Standards AM
November 2 Saturday: Transitioning to the
CCS, Standards for Mathematical Practice AM
November 2 Saturday: Creating a Positive
Classroom Environment AM
November 2 Saturday: Behavior Management
Skills for the Highly Effective Educator: A One
Day Overview
November 2 Saturday: Literacy CCSS...Text
Dependent Questions (PM)
November 2 Saturday: Transitioning to the
Math CCSS, Structured Collaborative
Conversations (PM)
November 2 Saturday: (for SPs) Standards
Driven Conversations: Assessing and
Developing Professional Expertise (all day)
November 2 Saturday: Technology Workshop
PM Level 2 (Intermediate)
Status
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Date
11/4/13
11/7/13
11/13/13
11/14/13
11/16/13
11/16/13
11/19/13
11/20/13
11/21/13
12/3/13
12/11/13
1/7/14
1/8/14
1/9/14
1/10/14
1/13/14
1/14/14
1/16/14
1/22/14
1/25/14
1/25/14
1/27/14
1/30/14
2/5/14
2/12/14
3/4/14
3/4/14
3/5/14
3/6/14
3/11/14
3/15/14
3/15/14
3/15/14
3/15/14
3/15/14
Event Name
Benchmark Seminar #2
Benchmark Seminar #2
EFC New Support Provider Training
Benchmark Seminar #2
Benchmark Seminar #2
Education Specialist Support Saturday 2
Benchmark Seminar #2
New Support Providers PD Institute
Benchmark Seminar #2
Benchmark Seminar #2
New Support Providers PD Institute
Coordinator/SCOE Planning Meeting
New Support Providers PD Institute
Oakland EFC Benchmark #2 at LWL
Home School Teachers Meeting
Benchmark Seminar #3
Oakland EFC Benchmark #2 at Ascend
Benchmark Seminar #3
Benchmark Seminar #3
Benchmark Seminar #3
Education Specialist Support Saturday 3
Benchmark Seminar #3
Benchmark Seminar #3
Benchmark Seminar #3
FACT Make up Day
Oakland EFC Benchmark #3 at Achieve
Home School Teachers Meeting
Benchmark Seminar #4
Oakland EFC Benchmark #3 at Lazear
March BTSA Induction Planning Day
March 15 PD Saturday: Supporting the Autistic
Student, 7 - 12
March 15 PD Saturday: Brainbreaks and
Behavior Strategies
March 15 PD Saturday: Supporting The EL
Learner, K-6
March 15 PD Saturday: Behavior Management
Skills for the Highly Effective Educator, K-12
March 15 PD Saturday: Bully
Prevention/Gender Equity K-12
Status
Closed
Closed
Information only
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Date
3/15/14
3/17/14
3/19/14
3/20/14
3/22/14
3/22/14
3/27/14
4/1/14
4/22/14
4/24/14
5/5/14
5/6/14
5/7/14
5/10/14
5/12/14
5/19/14
5/22/14
5/22/14
5/29/14
6/4/14
6/17/14
6/18/14
6/19/14
6/24/14
6/25/14
6/26/14
8/6/14
8/9/14
8/11/14
8/14/14
8/16/14
8/19/14
8/20/14
Event Name
March 15 PD Saturday: SP Problem Solving
Session
Benchmark Seminar #4
Benchmark Seminar #4
Benchmark Seminar #4
Benchmark Seminar #4
Education Specialist Support Saturday 4
Benchmark Seminar #4
Benchmark Seminar #4
Oakland EFC Benchmark #4 at Cox
Oakland EFC Benchmark #4 at LWL
Professional Induction Presentation
Coordinator/SCOE Planning Meeting
Professional Induction Presentation
Professional Induction Presentation
Professional Induction Presentation
Professional Induction Presentation
Professional Induction Presentation
John Muir Benchmark
Professional Induction Presentation
Professional Induction Presentation EFC
Advanced Support Provider Academy Day 1
Advanced Support Provider Academy Day 2
Advanced Support Provider Academy Day 3
New Support Provider Summer Academy Day
1
New Support Provider Summer Academy Day
2
New Support Provider Summer Academy Day
3
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Update for Returning Support Providers
Education for Change Orientation (Oakland)
Education for Change Orientation (Oakland)
Clear Education Specialist Credential
Candidates Orientation
Coordinator Meeting
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Status
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Date
8/28/14
9/4/14
9/10/14
9/11/14
9/16/14
9/20/14
9/20/14
9/25/14
9/30/14
10/1/14
10/2/14
10/2/14
10/7/14
10/7/14
10/8/14
10/9/14
10/10/14
10/14/14
10/16/14
10/23/14
10/25/14
10/25/14
11/1/14
11/1/14
11/1/14
11/1/14
11/1/14
11/1/14
Event Name
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
New Support Providers: FACT Training Day 1
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
General Education Credential Candidate
Orientation
Update for Returning Support Providers
John Muir Orientation
Benchmark Seminar 1
New Support Providers: FACT Training Day 2
Benchmark Seminar 1
Oakland EFC Benchmark #1
Oakland EFC Benchmark #1
NAEF (only) Benchmark 1
Benchmark Seminar 1
Coordinator/SCOE Planning Retreat Day 1
Coordinator/SCOE Planning Retreat
Benchmark Seminar 1
Benchmark Seminar 1
Benchmark Seminar 1
Benchmark Seminar 1
Education Specialist Support Saturday 1
Fall PD Saturday: SP Problem Solving Session
Fall PD Saturday: Bully Prevention/Gender
Equity K-12
Fall PD Saturday: Supporting The EL Learner,
K-6
Fall PD Saturday: Brain breaks and Behavior
Strategies
Fall PD Saturday: Digital Superstar: Engaging
students in a 'blended classroom'
(Beginner/Intermediate)
Fall PD Saturday: Digital Superstar: Engaging
students in a 'blended classroom' (same class as
the morning session)
Status
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Cancelled
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Date
11/1/14
11/5/14
11/6/14
11/12/14
11/13/14
11/18/14
11/20/14
11/22/14
11/22/14
12/1/14
12/10/14
1/7/15
1/8/15
1/8/15
1/13/15
1/14/15
1/15/15
1/20/15
1/20/15
1/22/15
1/24/15
1/24/15
1/28/15
3/4/15
3/7/15
3/10/15
3/10/15
3/12/15
3/12/15
3/17/15
3/18/15
3/24/15
3/26/15
3/28/15
3/28/15
5/7/15
5/9/15
5/12/15
5/13/15
Event Name
Fall PD Saturday: Behavior Management Skills
for the Highly Effective Educator, K-12
New Support Providers: FACT Training Day 3
Benchmark Seminar 2
Benchmark Seminar 2
Benchmark Seminar 2
Benchmark Seminar 2
Benchmark Seminar 2
Benchmark Seminar 2
Education Specialist Support Saturday 2
Benchmark Seminar 2
New Support Providers: FACT Training Day 4
Benchmark Seminar 3
Benchmark Seminar 3
Oakland EFC Benchmark #2
Coordinator Meeting
New Support Providers: FACT Training Day 5
Benchmark Seminar 3
Benchmark Seminar 3
Oakland EFC Benchmark #2
Benchmark Seminar 3
Benchmark Seminar 3
Education Specialist Support Saturday 3
Benchmark Seminar 3
Benchmark Seminar 4
Spring Cleaning for All!
Oakland EFC Benchmark #3
Benchmark Seminar 4
Benchmark Seminar 4
Oakland EFC Benchmark #3
Spring BTSA Induction Planning Day
Benchmark Seminar 4
Benchmark Seminar 4
Benchmark Seminar 4
Benchmark Seminar 4
Education Specialist Support Saturday 4
Professional Induction Presentation
Professional Induction Presentation
Coordinator/Advisory Meeting
Professional Induction Presentation
Status
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Too late to register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Date
5/14/15
5/14/15
5/19/15
5/19/15
5/21/15
5/27/15
Event Name
Professional Induction Presentation
Oakland EFC Benchmark #4
Oakland EFC Benchmark #4
Professional Induction Presentation
Professional Induction Presentation
Professional Induction Presentation
Status
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
Register
www.btsasacramento.org
Find us on Facebook!
www.facebook.com/btsasacramento
Foreword
Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) is a performance-based, formative assessment
and support system developed collaboratively by practitioners and researchers throughout the state,
under the direction of the California Department of Education and the Commission on Teacher
Credentialing. The FACT System is the second generation of Californias long-standing formative
assessment system, the California Formative Assessment and Support System for Teachers (CFASST).
The FACT System showcases assessment processes originally developed in California by California
educators working with both Educational Testing Services and West Ed research agencies.
The development of FACT is an example of teachers, universities, research agencies, and state
agencies working together to produce useful, high-quality tools to support the professional
development of teachers. The contributions of these agencies and dedicated California educators are
greatly appreciated.
Wendy Baron
Suzanne Riley
Reproduction of this document and related materials for use by California BTSA Induction
Programs is permissible.
Table of Contents
THE PROCESSES:
Context for Teaching and Learning ................................................................................ 12
Observation ..................................................................................................................... 24
Observation Record Options ........................................................................................... 32
Inquiry into Teaching and Learning ................................................................................. 36
Self Assessment.............................................................................................................. 48
Reflective Summary of Teaching Practice ..................................................................... 56
Conversation Guides ...................................................................................................... 60
CSTPs ............................................................................................................................. 68
GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
SOURCES OF EVIDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
SP SUPPORT
PT Pacing Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
SP Helper Guide Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
SP Helper Guide Year 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Quicksheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
The F A C T System
Formative Assessment for
California Teachers
1
2
3
EXPANDED TO SERVE MULTIPLE SUBJECT, SINGLE SUBJECT, AND ED SPECIALIST CLEAR CANDIDATES
Formative Assessment
7LAN
Return to Context for Teaching and Learning and Assessment of Teaching and Learning Year 2
A77LY
TEA*H
t$PMMFDUJOHBOE3FWJFXJOH$MBTT
4DIPPM
%JTUSJDUBOE$PNNVOJUZ
t$POUFYUVBMJ[JOHBOE&YUFOEJOH
*OGPSNBUJPO
9E
-LE*T
Assessment
of
Teaching
and
Learning
t-JOLJOH5FBDIFS
1SFQBSBUJPO,OPXMFEHF
t$451BOE*OEVDUJPO
4UBOEBSET#BTFE
t$MBTTSPPN0CTFSWBUJPO
t0CTFSWBUJPO
"OBMZTJTPG4UVEFOU8PSL
t4VNNBUJWF"TTFTTNFOU
t3FFDUJPOBOE"QQMJDBUJPO
@LHY
*`JSL
9LMSLJ[PVUVU;LHJOPUN:[\KLU[ZHUK7LYZVUHS.YV^[O
-\[\YL*VUZPKLYH[PVUZMVY:[\K`
t*ORVJSZ'PDVT
t"DUJPO1MBO
t1SFQBSJOHGPS*OTUSVDUJPO
&TTFOUJBM$PNQPOFOUTPG*OTUSVDUJPO
&OUSZ-FWFM"TTFTTNFOU
'PDVT4UVEFOU4FMFDUJPO
@LHY
*`JSL
Reflections
on
Teaching
and
Learning
tools
provide
the
basis
of
Participating
Teacher
reflection
and
self-assessment
for
goal
setting
and
measuring
growth.
The
tools
are
used
in
conjunction
with
the
California
Standards
for
the
Teaching
Profession
as
well
as
the
Continuum
of
Teaching
Practice.
The
Conversation
Guides
and
Self-Assessment
tools
emphasize
the
content
of
both
the
Multiple/Single
Subject
Induction
Program
Standards
and
the
Education
Specialist
Clear
Induction
Standards.
Teaching involves a search for meaning in the world. Teaching is a life project, a calling, a vocation
that is an organizing center of all other activities. Teaching is past and future, as well as present; it is
background as well as foreground; it is depth as well as surface. Teaching is pain and humor, joy and
anger, dreariness and epiphany. Teaching is world building; it is architecture and design; it is purpose
and moral enterprise. Teaching is a way of being in the world that breaks through the boundaries of the
traditional job and in the process redefines all life and teaching itself.
--William Ayers
What is FACT?
The FACT System guides teachers in their growth as professionals, focuses on meeting the learning
needs of all students, and promotes reflective practitioners. Participating teachers engage in an
ongoing learning process that follows a cycle of plan, teach, reflect, and apply. With the assistance of a
support provider, participating teachers identify areas of strength and growth, and complete an Individual
Induction Plan (IIP) for their research and professional development that is focused on the California
Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) and the Induction Program Standards (IPS).
The FACT System is composed of four modules (see chart on page 7). The Assessment of
Teaching and Learning module bridges teacher preparation with the induction experience as
teachers reflect on what they know and determine the current level of their teaching practice. This
assessment builds a foundation for future growth related to teaching standards.
While focusing on their teaching practice in the first module, participating teachers also address the
Context for Teaching and Learning module where they gather information about their class, and
the organization and resources of the school, district, and community. This contextual analysis
guides and informs participating teachers as they engage in subsequent FACT activities.
In the Inquiry into Teaching and Learning module, participating teachers assess their practice
against a set of specific criteria, and select an area for an in-depth inquiry. This investigation follows an
action research model, allowing participating teachers to research questions pertinent to their
classroom needs. The results of the inquiry guide the participating teachers professional development
as they explore the impact of their instruction on student achievement.
The final module, Summary of Teaching and Learning, is an end-of-year reflection. Participating
teachers review the results of the inquiries, consider the data collected, identify best teaching practices,
and assess the impact of formative assessment on their teaching practice.
5#)%&''&'
!&,-*%&'%./'+%
!&,-*%&'%(#+%
.,/-0)#*-,1!",*+,#+'10)#12&,%3-*415#)0&''-)*
.)//,=)#,"-<&1>&/,"-)*'3-9'1?!5@52A
6*+$%"-)*15#)4#,71!",*+,#+'
5/,*B12&,%3B1>&0/&%"B1:99/C
!","&8,+)9"&+1:%,+&7-%1.)*"&*"1!",*+,#+'
D='&#<,"-)*
;<-+&*%&
;E,7-*-*41!"$+&*"1F)#G
>&0/&%"-<&1.)*<&#',"-)*'
!&/08:''&''7&*"
!"#$%"$#&'
!"#$%&'%(#%)*+%
:''&''7&*"1)01
2&,%3-*41,*+1H&,#*-*4
.)*"&E"10)#12&,%3-*4
,*+1H&,#*-*4
Collecting
Contextualizing
Extending
>&0/&%"-)*'1)*
2&,%3-*41,*+1H&,#*-*4
!$77,#C1)01
2&,%3-*41,*+1H&,#*-*4
6*I$-#C1-*")1
2&,%3-*41,*+1H&,#*-*4
Action Research
Lesson Series
Individual Induction Plan
Plan
What%do%I%know%about%
my%students%and%my%
teaching%context?
Apply
Teach
How%will%I%apply%what%
Ive%learned%to%enhance%
student%learning?
How%am%I%implementing%
instruction%and%
addressing%
student%needs?
Reflect
What%have%I%learned%about%
my%teaching%and%my%
students?
Collecting Information - With your support provider, gather information on the following:
STEP TWO
Instructional Environment
Home/School
Class Profile
DIRECTIONS: Completing the class profile will help you learn about your teaching context. Consult with
your support provider, your administrators, and colleagues, to gather information about your teaching
context. You may add to the class profile at any time as you learn about your students, school, and
district. Revisit this class profile throughout the year. If your district/school provides this information
in another format, make a copy and attach it.
Student Name
Date of
Birth
English
Learner
Special Needs
Comments
(Check if applicable)
(K-3 only)
(Check if
applicable)
Identifiers*
* Possible Identifiers: 504Legal in-class Accommodations; GATE-Gifted & Talented Education; MED-Medical
Condition;
MI. Ed.-Migrant Education; RSP-Resource Specialist Program; Ret-Retained; S/L-Speech &
Language;
SP-Special Education w/IEP; SST-Student w/interventions.
Class Profile
DIRECTIONS: Consult with your support provider, administrators, and colleagues to gather information
about your teaching context. You may add to the Class Profile at any time as you learn about your
students, school, and district. Revisit this Class Profile throughout the year. Enter applicable information.
Use first names to protect confidentiality. If your district/school provides this information in another
format, copy and attach it.
Emergency
Contact
Condition
Support
(Resources, Assistive Technologies)
Next IEP
Meeting
Date
Classroom
Accommodations/
Modifications
Behavioral
Support
Strategies
Goals
Benchmarks
Case Carrier
Classroom
Accommodations
Behavioral Support
Strategies
SST Date to
Reconvene
Interventions to Implement
Academic Strengths
Social
Strengths
Individualized
Learning
Plan (ILP)
Goals
Recommendations
1
2
Reading
Writing
Composite
Score
Redesignated
Listening
Speaking
Migrant
Program
Years of ELD
Instruction
Language
spoken in
the Home1
Language
Students
Primary
Name
Student Name
Grade/Age
English
Learner
Primary
Disability
(Check if
applicable)
(Code Using
IEP
Meeting/Dates
Accountability
Outcomes
Designated
Instructional Services
Identifiers
below)
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CAPA
Academic Strengths
Social
Strengths
ILP
Goals
Recommendations
1
2
Reading
Writing
Comp
osite
Score
ReDesignated
Listening
Speaking
Migrant
Program
Years of ELD
Instruction
Languages
spoken in
the Home1
Language
Students
Primary
Name
Classroom
Accommodations
Behavioral Support
Strategies
Instructional Environment
Directions: Thoughtful consideration of your instructional environment is important in meeting the needs of
your students. Indicate how you have addressed appropriate prevention and intervention for safety
concerns. Include relevant information regarding student placement, equipment and instructional
materials/technology, etc. Include the rationale for your decisions. Draw or attach a layout of your
instructional environment.
Instructional Environment Design:
Immediate Intervention-Underperforming
Schools Program (IIUSP)/SAIT
Other:
Character Counts
Intervention
AVID
Conflict Resolution
Other
Other
Facilities
Academies/Houses/ Families
Computer Lab
Schedule
Technology
Department Grouping/PLC
Bus/Recess
Leadership
Teaching Teams
Library Schedule
Safety
Other
Other
School Enrollment:
# of Languages of students:
Ethnicities represented:
Committees
Location
Phone/email
Information
Contact Person
Phone #
Location
Instructional Materials /
Standards
Classroom Supplies
Technology
Library
English Learner
Other:
Student Data
Information
Information
Contact Person
Phone #
Location
District/School Test
Scores
Standardized Tests (CST,
CAPA, CMA, CAHSEE)
Online District Data
System
Student Support
Services
Contact Person
Information
Phone #
Location
Counselor
CPR Certified School
Staff
Emergency Coordinator
Healthy Start Coordinator
Nurse/Health Aide
Crisis Counselor
Speech/Language
School/District
Psychologist
SELPA
Special Education
Student Study Team /
504 Plans
Transition Services
Social Worker
Other:
Contact Name
Contact
Number
E-Mail Address/
Cell Phone Number
Contact Date/Comments
Participating Teacher:
DIRECTIONS: Knowledge of the policies and procedures at your site/assignment is important to you as
a professional educator. This list of discussion topics will help you understand your local teaching
context. In a meeting with your administrator or designee, discuss each of these items and obtain your
administrators signature. If your school/district provides this information in another format, you
may attach it.
Staff Information
Staff Roster
Staff Responsibilities
Intervention Programs
(Conflict Resolution, Bullying)
Emergency Procedures
School Information
School Policies
Homework Policy
Attendance Procedures
Hours to be on Campus
Observation
Observation
Purpose: Observations give participating teachers (PTs) the opportunity to consider their knowledge and skills, their
current context for teaching, and evidence gathered in a classroom observation. The assessment will help PTs
identify strengths and areas for growth, which will be used in subsequent inquiries of teaching practice. In addition,
PTs and their support providers (SP) will identify resources and types of support needed to develop and implement the
Individual Induction Plan For the Initial observation, there is no shared lesson plan or pre-conference. In later
observations, lesson plans are shared with the SP before the lesson. After the lesson, PTs and SPs reflect on the
lesson and analyze student work generated. The purpose of the observation is to help inform future practice.
INITIAL
INQUIRY
As part of the inquiry process, support providers observe their participating teachers. Using the Essential
Components for Instruction, teachers design a lesson series that meets the needs of all students. Differentiation
of instruction for focus students should be documented and student achievement data collected.
Pre-conference
Review the completed Essential Components for Instruction and corresponding
lesson plan.
Review information recorded in the Context for Teaching and on the Focus Student
Selection Form and use a seating chart to identify focus students.
Determine which lesson in the series is to be observed and select an observation tool
connected with the focus question identified by the PT.
Fill out the top portion of the Observation Record.
Observation
Support provider gathers evidence from one lesson within the series, using an
Observation Record.
Post-Observation Conversation
Support providers and participating teachers review evidence collected, including the
observation notes and student work.
After reviewing evidence, use the IIP Action Plan to record how the implemented
changes impacted classroom instruction.
PTs upload the observation notes to their e-portfolio.
Copyright Commission on Teacher Credentialing and the California Department of Education
Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) 2011
Page 25
Date:
K-W-O Chart
DIRECTIONS:
Determine a specific area of focus for the support providers observation of your
classroom. Reflect on current practice and indicate:
1 - What I know about my classroom practice
2 - What I want to know about my classroom practice
3 - What I would like my support provider to observe
K-W-O Chart
What I know about my classroom practice.
(e.g., I create an environment of respect; students understand the routines and procedures in my class, etc.)
Date:
CSTP 2:
Creating and Maintaining
Effective Environments for
Student Learning
CSTP 3:
Understanding and Organizing
Subject Matter for Student Learning
CSTP 5:
Assessing Students for Learning
CSTP 6:
Developing as a Professional
Educator
Date:
Copyright Commission on Teacher Credentialing and the California Department of Education
Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) 2011
Page 27
Date:
IPS 5: Pedagogy
Assessment
Multi-tiered Intervention
Learning Environment
Technology
Date:
Post-Observation Reflection
DIRECTIONS: With your support provider, use evidence from the observation to capture key insights about
your teaching.
Post-Observation Key Insights:
Insights:
Date:
Participating
Teacher
Support
Provider
District
Teaching
Assignment
Content
Area
School
ACTION PLAN: Examining research related to my focus question and applying new learning in my instructional setting
4. Date of 5.
research
4. Date of
research
Workshop or conference
Professional reading
Other
REFLECTION/APPLICATION
8.
Observation Record
Date:
Support Provider:
State-adopted
Academic Content
Standard(s):
Focus Question(s):
What evidence could your support provider collect in relation to your focus question?
Time Observation
Begins:
Time Observation
Ends:
Observation Data:
Check the box(es) indicating each CSTP observed during the lesson.
Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning (1)
The Induction Program Standards (Pedagogy, Universal Access: Equity for All Students, Universal Access: Teaching English
Learners, andUniversal Access: Teaching Special Populations) are embedded with obervation of the California Standards for
the Teaching Profession (CSTP).
Culturally/Linguistically
Responsive Teaching (E)
Student Participation
Collaboratively works in groups
with explicitly defined roles E1
Expresses understanding of
directions/content/ procedures E2
Engages in academic talk E3
Leads discussions and asks
questions E4
Practices responses in primary
language and English E5
Teacher Attention
Directs instruction to wide range of
students (gender, race, ethnicity)
E6
Calls on diverse students (gender,
race, ethnicity) E7
Validates and affirms multiple
perspectives regarding learning
and speaking styles and for
conflict resolution E8
Lesson Delivery
Pre-assesses/taps prior
knowledge SP15
Directions
Lesson Delivery
Building Background
Teacher Language
Strategies Observed
ELD
Clearly states Language learning
objectives from California ELD
standards EL14
Utilizes the district-adopted ELD
materials during the lesson EL15
Groups students by language
ability level EL16
Computers/printers in use
Powerpoints
DVD/Video Clips
Computer grading systems
Student Information Systems
Interactive Whiteboards
Overhead/Document cameras
Inquiry
Purpose: An inquiry-based system guides and informs participating teachers about their own professional
growth for the purpose of improving teaching. Participating teachers gather information, collaborate, and/or
observe a colleague, develop an action plan, implement that action plan, and look for ways to apply what is
being learned to a lesson series. The results are used to guide professional development and future practice.
STEP ONE
Designing the IIP
Attend workshops/courses
Analyze data such as, student work
Research a question on the Internet
STEP TWO
Preparing a Lesson
Series
Essential Components for Instruction Use this to ensure that all lesson components have been
considered when designing the lesson series.
Entry Level Assessment: Use information from an assessment to identify focus students, plan
lesson series, and make appropriate adaptations to instruction.
Selecting Focus Students Identify three students who represent the range of students in the
classroom or on the caseload: 1) English Learners 2) Special Populations and 3) Choice: A student
who completes the range of ability in the classroom not represented above.
STEP THREE
Lesson Observation
Observation
Collecting supportive evidence of implementation
Pre-conference
Review completed Essential Components for Instruction and corresponding lesson plan
Review information recorded on Focus Student Selection. Use a copy of the seating chart to identify
focus students.
Determine where the lesson to be observed fits within the lesson series.
Post Observation: After reviewing evidence, record how the changes implemented impacted classroom
instruction.
STEP FOUR
Examining Student
Work
At the conclusion of the lesson series, a summative assessment is given and participating teachers
and support providers analyze the work of class, especially the three focus students, in order to
document how effective students were in meeting learning goals.
STEP FIVE
Assessing
Professional Growth
Review the evidence collected and record conclusions on the IIP as a final reflection.
Using the Continuum of Professional Practice as a guide, teachers assess practice in relation to the
CSTPs.
IIP #
Date:
Support Provider
District
Teaching
Assignment
Content Area
School
PLAN
ACTION PLAN: Examining research related to my focus question and applying new learning in my classroom
5. Date of research
6. Identify which resources (more then one) you will use for your research and describe below
Workshop or conference
Professional reading
Other
PLAN/TEACH
REFLECTION/APPLICATION
9B. Share your learning about student development, instructional practices, academic content, and/or yourself as a teacher.
REFLECT
9A. As a result of the inquiry process, describe the impact on instructional/classroom practices and student achievement? (list specific
evidence)
10. Describe how you will apply new learning to future practice.
APPLY
Support Provider:
Content Area:
Beginning Date:
Grade/Period:
1.
2.
Ending Date:
3.
4.
8. Other considerations:
Page 1 of 1
Date:
Partially Met
AT LEVEL OR IEP
EXPECTANCIES
ABOVE LEVEL OR
IEP EXPECTANCIES
Met
Exceeds
Date:
Above Grade
Level or
IEP Expectancies
At Grade Level or
IEP Expectancies
DIRECTIONS: Based on the entry-level assessment, discuss the results with your support provider, and
respond to the questions below. Attach copies of the entry-level assessment responses for your
three focus students.
Before instruction begins, what do the assessment results tell you about what your students
understand and are able to do? What do you think are some possible factors to consider, for students
to achieve at each of these levels?
Not Met:
Partially Met:
Met:
Exceeds:
How will you provide interventions for students categorized as not met or partially met? What additional
support may be needed?
How will you differentiate for the students categorized as met or exceeds?
Partially Met
At Grade Level or
IEP Expectancies
Above Grade
Level or IEP
Expectancies
Met
Exceeds
Focus Student 1:
English Learner
Alternate:
Focus Student 2:
Special Populations
Alternate:
Focus Student 3:
Choice
Alternate:
Describe instructional or behavioral considerations for each focus student. Additional considerations may
include work habits, social skills, social/emotional, behavior, and practical abilities, academic abilities,
personal interests, etc.
Focus Student 1:
English Learner
What support/resources (e.g., EL coach, translation materials, primary language textbook, etc.) do you
anticipate this student will need?
Focus Student 2:
Special
Populations
What support/resources (e.g., paraprofessional, designated instructional support, adaptive technologies,
etc.) do you anticipate this student will need?
Focus Student 3:
Choice
What support/resources do you anticipate this student will need?
Time
Allocation:
Sequence of Lesson:
Introduction:
Direct Instruction:
Modeled Instruction:
Independent Practice:
Date:
Partially Met
AT LEVEL OR IEP
EXPECTANCIES
ABOVE LEVEL OR
IEP EXPECTANCIES
Met
Exceeds
Date:
2.
3.
Reflect on the Essential Components for Instruction document (C-2, Boxes 6, 11, and 12). For students
scoring in the categories of not met or partially met describe how the following may have impacted their
learning?
a. Entry Level and Progress Monitoring Assessment results (Box 6):
b.
c.
d.
Other:
4.
Given the summative assessment, what additional interventions might you provide for students who
did not meet the learning objectives?
5.
What needs might you anticipate for the students who exceeded the learning objectives?
Self-Assessment
Self Assessment
Purpose: Teachers knowledge, skills, and practices develop throughout their professional
careers. The nature of teaching requires continuous growth in order to engage and challenge
increasingly diverse students. Teachers are never finished as professional learners, no matter
how extensive or excellent their formal education and preparation. If teachers expertise,
capabilities, and accomplishments are to be enriched over time, they must become reflective
practitioners who actively seek to strengthen and augment their professional skills, knowledge,
and perspectives throughout their careers.
Self-Assessment: Pedagogy
Name:
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Class Profile; School and District Information/ Resources; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work;
Classroom Observations; School Calendar; Standards for Student Behavior/Classroom Rules/Discipline Plan; Student Strengths (See Class Profile); Assessment and Technology tools; Instructional
Materials; Pacing Guide/Curriculum Map/Scope and Sequence; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work; Classroom Observations
Name:
Inclusive
Environments:
How I support
students from all
ethnic, racial, socioeconomic, cultural,
academic, and
linguistic
backgrounds; gender,
gender identity, and
sexual orientation
Teaching
Practice:
How I use culturally
responsive teaching
practices to overcome
the effects of bias on
my students
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Directions: Do you.
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Validate and affirm multiple perspectives regarding learning and speaking styles and
for conflict resolution
Affirm and teach appropriate use of home, social, and academic language (situational
appropriateness)
Stop sexual harassment of all forms (sexual orientation and gender expression),
bullying, and racial slurs
Communication:
How I communicate
with students,
colleagues, resource
personnel and families
to provide equitable
access to the stateadopted academic
content standards
Seek student explanation for the cause of off task behavior prior to redirection.
Present positive support and positive consequences more frequently than the
highlighting of negative consequences
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Use families as sources of knowledge about students strengths, interests and needs
Provide opportunities for all families to participate in the classroom and school
community
Possible sources of evidence: Class Profile; School and District Information/ Resources; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work; Classroom Observations
Name:
Collaboration:
Collaboration: Do you
Modifications/
Accommodations:
How I instruct special
populations including
advanced learners (e.g.
varying curriculum depth
and complexity and/or
using technology)
Behavioral Support
Strategies:
How I recognize students
strengths and needs and
use positive behavioral
strategies to meet the
needs of all students
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Lesson Delivery
Scaffold instruction
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Do you
Move about the room; increase presence where problems might occur
Possible sources of evidence: Class Profile, SST Artifacts; Assessment Results; Sample from Instructional Materials Used; School and District Information/ Resources that meet the needs of
special populations; Student Work; Classroom Observations
Name:
Language Supports:
How I use measures of
English language
proficiency to make
instructional decisions
ELD Instruction:
How I support my students
development of academic
language and English
language development
Differentiated
Instruction:
How I differentiate
instruction based on my
students culture, levels of
acculturation, proficiency in
English and/or prior
schooling
Interaction: Do you
ELD: Do you
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Class Profile; School and District Information/ Resources; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work;
Classroom Observations
Name:
Collaboration,
Consultation, and
Co-teaching in the
LRE:
How I support my
students integration
into the Least
Restrictive
Environment
Professional
Development:
How I make
selections to advance
my professional
growth
Current Research
and Trends
How I integrate
current research into
my practice
Do you
Social intervention
Academic intervention
Advanced level data driven instruction
Behavioral intervention
Current legal issues
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Using the Checklist and citing evidence, describe your strengths and challenges.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Conversation Log, Lesson Plan, IIP, Assessment Results; Student Work; Classroom Observation
Reflective Summary of
Teaching Practice
STEP
ONE
Reflective Conversations
Assessing professional growth over time
Review the Self-Assessments and the Continuum of Teaching Practice. Consider the evidence
collected during the Context for Teaching and Learning and the Inquiry into Teaching and Learning and
use the Culminating Questions and Reflection Guide to navigate through a reflective conversation.
STEP
TWO
Written Reflection
Assessing professional growth over time
Written reflection
Using the Culminating Questions and Reflections Guide, identify teaching practices that had the
greatest impact on student learning and the progress you made toward your professional growth
goals. Meet with your support provider to:
STEP
THREE
Prepare to share your key insights. Your program director will determine the process and venue for sharing.
DIRECTIONS: Based on your work this year, use evidence to guide your thinking and prepare a written reflection. The key insights
captured here may be shared during your programs culminating activity.
2.
expected?
Conversation Guides
Conversation Guides
Purpose: Conversation Guides are intended to challenge thinking by focusing attention on evidence. Participating
Teachers are asked to collect evidence and engage in collaborative conversation with their support provider to actively
problem-solve and make decisions.
There are six Conversation Guides (five for MS/SS candidates and six for Education Specialist Candidates):
Class, School District Community (CSDC)
Pedagogy
Equity
English Learners
Special Populations
Education Specialist (only) Conversation Guide
Each guide has sections:
Collecting: Evidence that needs to be collected.
Contextualizing: Prompts to choose from that are designed to promote thinking.
Extending: Space to reflect upon this information as it impacts teacher effectiveness and student
learning.
STEP ONE
Review the Collecting column of the guides and decide how to gather evidence. Generally,
Participating Teachers in their first year focus on the CSDC, Pedagogy and Equity Guides. In Year
2, Participating Teachers review Special Populations and English Learners Guides.
The conversation should be focused on evidence. The Participating Teacher and Support Provider
should decide on which items of evidence listed in the Collecting Column of the Conversation Guide
will be shared in the portfolio.
Select questions that are relevant to the Participating Teachers evidence, experience, and needs.
Use these questions as prompts to make meaning. Please note that questions in the Extending
column are intended to help the Participating Teacher think more deeply about the topic.
STEP TWO
As artifacts are reviewed and discussed, the Support Provider may wish to take notes as evidence
for marking the Continuum of Teaching Practice. These notes are intended to capture thinking,
insights, and next steps.
Conversation Guide
Class, School, District, and Community
DIRECTIONS: As a support provider, discuss the prompts below with your participating teacher. The information discussed will help
guide your participating teacher with classroom decision-making and identification of areas for future inquiry. The discussion will lead
into graduated levels of depth and complexity. Collecting requires gathering information. Contextualizing requires application of the
gathered information to your classroom practice. Extending invites deeper thinking with application to future practice.
Participating Teacher:
Grade Level/Subject:
Instructional
Environment
Home/School
Communication
Site Orientation
Checklist
Community Map
Extending
Contextualizing
Conversation Guide
Education Specialist
Purpose: Use these questions to identify areas that would be helpful to discuss with your support provider.
Participating Teacher:
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
Assemble Information
Caseload Profile
School Information
District and
Community
Information
How can I most effectively review and monitor each students Individual Education Plan (IEP)?
What is the best method for organizing my student records and confidential files?
What is the plan to track the IEP review dates and timelines?
What type of evidence/data do I need for student progress toward IEP goals?
What is my plan for informing the general education teachers of the students specific needs, modifications,
accommodations, and/or behavioral support?
Outside IEP meetings with parents, what system do I have for informing parents of IEP goal progress?
How do I facilitate parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for the student?
How can I most effectively use my instructional assistant(s) and/or one-on-one paraprofessional(s)? What
are their responsibilities?
Who are the special education administrators in my district and what are their roles?
Is there a procedural manual for special education?
How are students referred for special education?
Where are the confidential IEP files kept?
Who do I contact to be able to access SEIS/SELPA Manager?
Have I been trained in the IEP process specific to my district/SELPA?
What other support or alternative programs are available in my district/county/SELPA and how are these
programs accessed?
Who performs Functional Behavioral Assessments and develops the Behavior Support Plan?
What are the current implications and changes to IDEA relative to my teaching?
Conversation Guide
Pedagogy
DIRECTIONS: As a support provider, discuss the prompts below with your participating teacher. The information discussed will help
guide your participating teacher with classroom decision-making and identification of areas for future inquiry. The discussion will lead
into graduated levels of depth and complexity. Collecting requires gathering information. Contextualizing requires application of the
gathered information to your classroom practice. Extending invites deeper thinking with application to future practice.
Participating Teacher:
Grade Level/Subject:
Instructional Materials
(teacher edition, student
texts, support materials,
enrichment)
Pacing Guide/
Curriculum Map/ Scope
and Sequence
Student Strengths
Contextualizing
Extending
Conversation Guide
Universal Access l Equity
DIRECTIONS: As a support provider, discuss the prompts below with your participating teacher. The information discussed will help
guide your participating teacher with classroom decision-making and identification of areas for future inquiry. The discussion will lead
into graduated levels of depth and complexity. Collecting requires gathering information. Contextualizing requires application of the
gathered information to your classroom practice. Extending invites deeper thinking with application to future practice.
Participating Teacher:
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
Extending
Conversation Guide
Universal Access l Teaching English Learners
DIRECTIONS: As a support provider, discuss the prompts below with your participating teacher. The information discussed will help
guide your participating teacher with classroom decision-making and identification of areas for future inquiry. The discussion will lead
into graduated levels of depth and complexity. Collecting requires gathering information. Contextualizing requires application of the
gathered information to your classroom practice. Extending invites deeper thinking with application to future practice.
Participating Teacher:
Grade Level/Subject:
School/Grade Level
Assessments for EL
Students.
Adopted EL
Instructional Materials
Examination of State
ELD Standards
Technology Resources
for Instruction
Contextualizing
Extending
Conversation Guide
Universal Access l Teaching Special Populations
DIRECTIONS: As a support provider, discuss the prompts below with your participating teacher. The information discussed will help
guide your participating teacher with classroom decision-making and identification of areas for future inquiry. The discussion will lead
into graduated levels of depth and complexity. Collecting requires gathering information. Contextualizing requires application of the
gathered information to your classroom practice. Extending invites deeper thinking with application to future practice.
Participating Teacher:
Grade Level/Subject:
Identification of Class
Profile Students:
Health Problems
Individual Education
Plans (IEP)
SST Interventions
504 Plans
Contextualizing
Extending
STANDARD TWO:
STANDARD THREE:
STANDARD FOUR:
3.5 Using and adapting resources, technologies, and standardsaligned instructional materials, including adopted materials, to
make subject matter accessible to all students
STANDARD FIVE:
STANDARD SIX:
Glossary
And
Acronyms
Acronyms
API
SAIT
AVID
SARC
AYP
SP
Support Provider
BTSA
CDE
CELDT
CFASST
CSTP
CTC
Commission on Teacher
Credentialing
CTP
DAIT
EL
English Learners
FACT
GATE
IEP
IHE
IIP
IPS
MOU
Memorandum of Understanding
PT
Participating Teacher
PTRA
RTI
TPA
TPE
UA
Universal Access
Sources of Evidence
Documentation Source
Code
TPA
PE
CFTL
Observation
Lesson Plans
(Essential Components for Instruction)
LP
Reflection
Student Work
SW
Benchmark Seminar 1
OCTOBER
Orientation
YEAR 1 PT TASKS
YEAR 2 PT TASKS
Induction Advisement
Credential Roles and Responsibilities
Induction Advisement
Credential Roles and Responsibilities
o Instructional Environment
o School and District Information/Resources
o
o
Instructional Environment
School and District Information/Resources
o
o
End-of-Year PIP
MAY
Benchmark Seminar 4
MARCH
Benchmark Seminar 3
JANUARY
Benchmark Seminar 2
NOVEMBER
Intake IIP
Self Assessments (UPLOAD
o
Initial: Pedagogy
Initial: Equity
o Lesson Plan
o Observation
o Lesson Plan
o Observation
Final: Equity
Statewide Survey
o
o
REVIEW:
Review the Intake IIP. Your PT will use this form to become familiar
with CSTP 2 and the Inquiry process.
PREVIEW and PREPARATION for Benchmark #1
Make sure your PT has scheduled a meeting with the site administrator
to complete a Site Orientation Checklist.
Assist your PT prepare Context for Teaching forms for the Benchmark
#1 Seminar.
Orientation
Benchmark Seminar 1 FOCUS
OCTOBER
SP TASKS
REVIEW:
Help your PT implement the Intake IIP Action Plan for CSTP 2.
Benchmark 2
NOVEMBER
REVIEW:
Self Assessments (To be
Uploaded)
o Initial: Pedagogy
o Initial: Equity
Revisit the Context for Teaching, the Initial Observation Record, the
Continuum of Professional Practice, and the Self-Assessment
Planning Prompts for Standard 6: Equity. Use this information to
help your PT identify an area of focus on the IIP.
Review directions for the Inquiry Cycle to be sure you understand the
purpose and role of each form in supporting the inquiry process.
Help your PT complete the Focus of the Inquiry section of the IIP. Be
sure the PT connects the focus question to a CSTP and Equity Standard
and crafts a question that will produce measurable evidence.
Work with your PT to build a relevant and useful IIP Action Plan. Guide
the selection of professional development activities that are meaningful
and relevant. You will approve this task. Assist in collecting certificates of
attendance and/or summaries/reflections to verify the hours posted on
MyBTSA.
Discuss the results of the Entry Level Assessment and be sure that
appropriate scoring criteria is used.
Revisit all documents and artifacts and use this evidence to mark the
Continuum of Professional Practice (using evidence codes).
End-of-Year PIP
MAY
Benchmark 4
MARCH
REVIEW:
Self Assessments (To be
Uploaded)
o Final: Pedagogy
o Final: Equity
Statewide Survey
Revisit the Conversation Guides for Pedagogy and Equity during the
weekly conversations.
Be sure your PT has paper copies of their Inquiry cycle and their
reflections to submit at the PIP.
YEAR 2 PT TASKS
Induction Advisement
Credential Roles and Responsibilities
REVIEW: Orientation
Review the orientation content with your PT.
Orientation
Benchmark 1
OCTOBER
SP TASKS
REVIEW:
Be sure that your PT has based self-assessments on cited
evidence and has uploaded the initial self-assessments to
MyBTSA.
PREVIEW and PREPARATION for Benchmark #2
Benchmark 2
NOVEMBER
End-of-Year PIP
MAY
Benchmark 4
MARCH
Benchmark 3
JANUARY
REVIEW:
Review the Inquiry cycle to be sure you understand the purpose
of each form in supporting the inquiry process.
PREVIEW and PREPARATION for Benchmark #3
Help the PT work with the IIP. Be sure the PT connects the
focus question to a CSTP and Induction Standard and that the
question will produce evidence that is measurable.
REVIEW:
Revisit the Conversation Guides for English Learners during
the weekly conversations continuing to note key insights.
PREVIEW and PREPARATION for Benchmark #4
Walk your PT through the same Inquiry steps noted above.
REVIEW:
Be sure that your PT to has completed and uploaded Inquiry
#2 and all Self Assessments to MyBTSA.
PREVIEW and PREPARATION for End-of Year Event
Read the Summary of Teaching Practice and use the
suggested questions to help your PT synthesize progress
towards meeting professional growth goals.
PREPARATION for End-of Year Event
Prepare your PT to describe a complete Inquiry #2 Cycle.
Be sure your PT has paper copies of the Inquiry, SelfAssessments, and the Reflective Summary to submit at the
PIP.
uick Sheet
2013-2014
Purpose
o
o
Weekly Conversations
Log 40 hours on MyBTSA Can include both faceto-face and email meetings with your SP. Up to 12
hours of grade/department level meeting time can
count provided that a copy of the grade/department
notes are shared with your Support Provider.
o Professional Development
Select PD tied to your professional growth goals
and and log them into MyBTSA . Work with your
SP, BTSA Coordinator or SCOE BTSA Program
Directors to review options for PD
PLEASE NOTE:
You must post a record of ALL your BTSA
work to your MyBTSA electronic file located at
www.btsasacramento.org
CSUS Units (Optional)
Six (6) units per year can be purchased
Register online through your MyBTSA homepage
Deadline for registration is May 15, 2014
NOTICE: For complete information regarding the
BTSA
PROGRAM COMPLETION
BTSA STAFF
Darby Williams
Program Director
916-228-2664
dwilliams@scoe.net
Dawn McCarron
Program Analyst
916-228-2496
dmccarron@scoe.net
Kris Silbaugh
Administrative Assistant
916-228-3301
ksilbaugh@scoe.net
FAX 916-228-3921
uick Sheet
BTSA
Beginning Teacher Support & Assessment
Purpose
Inquiry Cycle(s)
Self Assessments
Reflective Summary of Teaching Practice
www.btsasacramento.org
BTSA STAFF
Darby Williams
Program Director
916-228-2664
dwilliams@scoe.net
Dawn McCarron
Program Analyst
916-228-2496
dmccarron@scoe.net
Kris Silbaugh
Administrative Assistant
916-228-3301
ksilbaugh@scoe.net
z0
~
::J
.,A
1-0')
\1..1
~\
r/J
-<;
::J
9
z
!<
cd
~
~.
~I~
~
.~
~
4.J
I:I..t
t:
f-t
~-.
'-V
>t
~
.~
.,.c
.~
-"~
"y-""
.,..
Jot.,
c.o
c.n
'"
:3
C'I$
~
~
~
<
>
.5
<
1-0')
I.Lj
>
~
c./)
0
Z
Pot
~
~
0'1
0'1
~
"-'
Iu
0
>
-<
~
1-0')
..
'0
I-
0
~
I-c
<
~
~
,."
"'"
S
0
cl::
"iJ
~
<
~
~
"iJ
--(
Student Participation
Building Background
E2 Expresses understanding of
directions/content/procedures
Teacher Attention
Lesson Delivery
EL4 Differentiates lesson
appropriate to students
language levels
Teacher Language
Lesson Delivery
Directions
E15 Presents explicit task steps and
outcomes: Orally, Visually, Other
E16 Uses samples of exemplary
student work
Interaction
EL8 Provides frequent
opportunities for interaction
and discussion that
promotes higher-order
thinking skills
EL9 Grouping supports
language and content
objectives of the lesson
EL10 Provides sufficient wait
time for student responses
EL11 At least 50% of the talking
is by the students
ELD
Resources Observed
Computers/printers in use
DVD/Video Clips
Student Information/grading
Systems
Interactive Whiteboards
Overhead/Document cameras
BTSARolesandResponsibilities:SupportProvider
1.
ActivelyparticipateinrequiredConsortiumSupportProviderTrainingforyearoneandallperiodic
updates.
2.
Understandtheprofessionalinductionandcredentialingprocessthroughactivesupportandengagement
intheentireBTSAInductionProgram.
3.
FrequentlyuseMyBTSAtorecordinformationandcheckontheprogressofyourPT(s).
4.
CompleterequiredMyBTSAwebsitedocumentation.
5.MeetweeklywithyourParticipatingTeacher(s)foranaverage1.5hourseachweek.
6.ObserveyourParticipatingTeacher(s)inordertoprovideinformationbasedontheCaliforniaStandards
fortheTeachingProfessionandtheInductionProgramStandardstobeusedinformativeselfassessment
andindeterminingappropriateprofessionaldevelopment.
7. SupportandguideyourParticipatingTeacher(s)increating,implementingandperiodicallyrevisingan
IndividualizedInductionPlan(IIP)[ActionPlan]basedontheresultsofformativeassessment.Checkthat
yourPThasuploadedIIPtotheMyBTSAwebsite.
8.
SupportandguideyourParticipatingTeacher(s)indevelopingaprofessionalteachingportfoliobasedon
theevidencecollectedthroughFACT.
9.
CompletethesummaryinterviewwithyourParticipatingTeacher(s)inpreparationfortheirpresentation
atanEndofYearEvent.
10.
AttendandparticipateinthefourBenchmarkSeminarsandEndofYearEvent.
11.
CollaboratewithyourParticipatingTeacher(s),SiteAdministrator(s),BTSAparticipants,andcolleagues.
12.
Participateintheprogramevaluationprocess.ProvidefeedbackonprogrameffectivenesstotheProgram
Director,BTSACoordinator,andAdvisoryCouncilrepresentatives.
13.
Supporttheparticipatingteacherinthecollectionofevidencethatmeetsprogramstandardsregarding
hisorherteachingpracticeoverthetwoyearperiod.
14.
AssisttheParticipatingTeacherinreviewingfortheEndofYearEventpresentation.
15.IfforanyreasonyouandyourParticipatingTeacherarenotworkingtogetherinaprofessionaland
productivemanner,pleaseinformyourDistrictCoordinatorortheBTSADirector.Changescanalwaysbe
made,andthereisnofaultorblameonanyone.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Signature
Date
District/Charter:
Date:
ContinuumofMentoringPracticeFocusElements:1.52.43.14.55.56.3
Next Steps
Strengths
Integrating/Innovating
2011NewTeacherCenter
Areas of Growth
Applying
Evidence of Practice
Beginning/Emerging
Facilitates and advances the professional learning of each teacher to increase student learning. Highlight descriptions that best match your
practice.
Name:
District/Charter:
Date:
Integrating/Innovating
2011NewTeacherCenter
Areas of Growth
Applying
ContinuumofMentoringPracticeFocusElements:1.52.43.14.55.56.3
Next Steps
Strengths
Beginning/Emerging
Evidence of Practice
2.4 Models and teaches how to build
effective partnerships with families,
stakeholders colleagues that foster
equitable achievement for students of all
backgrounds
Creates and maintains collaborative and professional partnerships to advance teacher practice and student learning. Highlight descriptions that best
match your practice.
Name:
District/Charter:
Date:
2011NewTeacherCenter
Next Steps
ContinuumofMentoringPracticeFocusElements:1.52.43.14.55.56.3
Areas of Growth
Integrating/Innovating
Strengths
Applying
Evidence of Practice
Beginning/Emerging
Utilizes knowledge of standards, pedagogy, and research to advance teaching practice and student learning. Highlight descriptions that best match
your practice.
Name:
District/Charter:
Date:
2011NewTeacherCenter
Next Steps
ContinuumofMentoringPracticeFocusElements:1.52.43.14.55.56.3
Areas of Growth
Strengths
Integrating/Innovating
Applying
Evidence of Practice
Beginning/Emerging
Promotes professional learning for teachers for continuous improvement and student learning. Highlight descriptions that best match your practice.
Name:
District/Charter:
Date:
2011NewTeacherCenter
Next Steps
ContinuumofMentoringPracticeFocusElements:1.52.43.14.55.56.3
Areas of Growth
Integrating/Innovating
Strengths
Applying
Evidence of Practice
Beginning/Emerging
Uses assessment data to advance teaching practice and student learning. Highlight descriptions that best match your practice.
Name:
District/Charter:
Date:
2011NewTeacherCenter
Next Steps
ContinuumofMentoringPracticeFocusElements:1.52.43.14.55.56.3
Areas of Growth
Integrating/Innovating
Strengths
Applying
Evidence of Practice
Beginning/Emerging
Develops as a professional leader to advance mentoring and the profession. Highlight descriptions that best match your practice.
Name:
QuickSheet
SPGuidebook
PTHandbook
MentorContinuum
CSTPContinuum
MyBTSA
ROLEALIKEGROUPS
Credentialing/FACT
AdultLearning
Underpinnings
SupportProviderRole
Practice
Recap
Review
ContextforTeaching
StartwithPurpose
Day1(Sept)
Welcome
Introductionto
Program
Overview(ppt)
Recap
Review
BasicUnderstandingof
Credentialingnot
courseworkapplication
ofworkinthefield
ROLEALIKE
GROUPS
Documents:
SelfAssessment
Inquiry
ConversationGuides
StartwithPurpose
SupportProviderRole
Practice
Day2(Oct)
Welcome
Recap
Overview(ppt)
Recap
Review
SupportProviderRole
Practice
ROLEALIKE
GROUPS
Documents:
SelfAssessment
Inquiry
ConversationGuides
StartwithPurpose
Coaching
Day3(Nov)
Welcome
Recap
Overview(ppt)
Recap
Review
SupportProviderRole
Practice
ROLEALIKE
GROUPS
Documents:
Context
SelfAssessment
Inquiry
ConversationGuides
StartwithPurpose
SkillSets
Day4(Dec)
Welcome
Recap
Overview
(ppt)
20142015SupportProviderTraining
Recap
Review
SupportProviderRole
Practice
ROLEALIKE
GROUPS
Documents:
SummaryofTeaching
Practice
Inquiry
ConversationGuides
StartwithPurpose
AsaMentor:
Continuum/ActionPlan
Day5(Jan)
Welcome
Recap
Overview(ppt)
Rolealikegroups:
LorieSpecialEd.
Lisaindependents
Steveelementary
Marymiddle/highschool
Groupfacilitatorswill
changeeachtrainingday....
20142015SupportProviderTraining
FormativeAssessmentforCaliforniaTeachers
FACTSystemforMS/SSInductionClearandEdSpecialistClearCredentialPrograms2011
FACTSYSTEM
EXPANDEDTOSERVE MULTIPLESUBJECT,SINGLESUBJECT,ANDEDSPECIALISTCLEARCANDIDATES
Return to Context for Teaching and Learning and Assessment of Teaching and Learning Year 2
ContextforTeachingandLearningmoduleallows
forcandidatesofallcredentialtypestolearnabout
their students, families, district and community.
Ed Specialist candidates will complete a Student
Service Profile in order to accommodate their
differingstudentpopulationandenvironment.
Formative Assessment
forCaliforniaTeachers
Context for Teaching
and Learning
t $PMMFDUJOH BOE 3FWJFXJOH $MBTT,
4DIPPM, %JTUSJDU BOE $PNNVOJUZ
t $POUFYUVBMJ[JOH BOE &YUFOEJOH
*OGPSNBUJPO
Assessment of
Teaching and Learning
t -JOLJOH 5FBDIFS
1SFQBSBUJPO ,OPXMFEHF
t $451 BOE *OEVDUJPO
4UBOEBSET #BTFE
t $MBTTSPPN 0CTFSWBUJPO
t 0CTFSWBUJPO
- "OBMZTJT PG 4UVEFOU 8PSL
t 4VNNBUJWF "TTFTTNFOU
t 3FFDUJPO BOE "QQMJDBUJPO
Year1
cycle
(AssessmentToolbox)
Year2
cycle
InquiryintoTeachingandLearningmoduleallows
the candidate to focus on the students and
classroom/environment in which they are
instructing. The individual selection of an inquiry
focus question will allow all candidates to drive
their work in relation to the credential they are
clearing,EdSpecialistorMultiple/SingleSubject.
SummaryofTeachingandLearningmodulebrings
a process of closure to the Induction experiences.
AllCandidateswillengageinaprocessalignedwith
theindividualprogramforsharingtheirgrowthand
future goals identified through the appropriate
programstandardsandtheCaliforniaStandardsfor
theTeachingProfession.
ReflectionsonTeachingandLearningtoolsprovidethebasisofParticipatingTeacherreflectionandselfassessmentforgoal
settingandmeasuringgrowth.ThetoolsareusedinconjunctionwiththeCaliforniaStandardsfortheTeachingProfessionas
wellas theContinuum of TeachingPractice. The ConversationGuidesand SelfAssessmenttools emphasizethe contentof
boththeMultiple/SingleSubjectInductionProgramStandardsandtheEducationSpecialistClearInductionStandards.
Participating Teacher:
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
Assemble Information
Caseload
Profile
School
Information
District and
Community
Information
How can I most effectively review and monitor each students Individual Education Plan (IEP)?
Outside IEP meetings with parents, what system do I have for informing parents of IEP goal
progress?
How do I facilitate parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for the
student?
Who performs the following: scheduling IEPs; notifying team members; coordinating the initial
assessment; keeping track of the 30 day interim placements; coordinating the triennial
assessment; facilitating the IEP meeting?
How is special education at my site viewed by other students, faculty, parents and administration?
Who are the special education administrators in my district and what are their roles?
Who performs Functional Behavioral Assessments and develops the Behavior Support Plan?
What is the best method for organizing my student records and confidential files?
What is the plan to track the IEP review dates and timelines?
What type of evidence/data do I need for student progress toward IEP goals?
What is my plan for informing the general education teachers of the students specific needs,
modifications, accommodations, and/or behavioral support?
Who determines whether an English Learner referral is a language needs issue or a special
education issue?
What is the role of the general education teacher in the IEP process?
What type of communication procedures are in use between the general education teachers and
the case managers? (e.g. are there any forms available for the special education teachers to use
in communication with the general education teachers?)
How is the schools discipline plan implemented with my students who have IEPs?
How are my students included in statewide and in-district testing?
How do I request an assessment for Designated Instructional Service (DIS) support for a student?
Pedagogy (E-2.5)
Self-Assessment
Evidence:
Technology:
- How do you use technology
Evidence:
Learning Environment:
- In what ways do you create
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Class Profile; School and District Information/ Resources; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work; Classroom Observations School Calendar; Standards for Student
Behavior/Classroom Rules/Discipline Plan; Student Strengths (See Class Profile); Assessment and Technology tools; Instructional Materials; Pacing Guide/Curriculum Map/Scope and Sequence; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work; Classroom
Observations
Copyright Commission on Teacher Credentialing and the California Department of Education
Page 1 of 1
Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) 2014
Reflections on Teaching and Learning - Induction Standard 5 Self-Assessment
Evidence:
Participating teachers grow and improve in their ability to reflect upon and apply the California Standards for the Teaching Profession and the specific pedagogical skills for subject matter instruction
beyond what was demonstrated for the preliminary credential. They utilize the adopted academic content standards and performance levels for students, curriculum frameworks, and instructional
materials in the context of their teaching assignment.
Participating teachers use and
Describe your strengths and challenges related to assessment.
Reflection Planning Prompts:
interpret student assessment data
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Assessment Data:
from multiple measures for entry
- Discuss how you use
level, progress monitoring, and
multiple measures to
summative assessments of student
monitor students progress
academic performance to inform
toward meeting adopted
Final Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
instruction. They plan and
academic content
differentiate instruction using multistandards?
tiered interventions as appropriate
Evidence:
based on the assessed individual,
academic language and literacy, and
diverse learning needs of the full
Describe your strengths and challenges related to implementing interventions.
Multi-tiered Interventions:
range of learners (e.g. struggling
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
How do you use multi-tiered
readers, students with special needs,
interventions to meet the
English learners, speakers of nondiverse learning needs of
dominant varieties of English, and
your full range of learners?
advanced learners).
Directions: With your support provider review and discuss the standards below referencing any information gained through Conversation Guides.
Name:
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
Is all of the information correct?
How will the SEIS manager be informed of necessary changes?
Does the IEP clearly specify the childs disability(s)?
Did the IEP identify how the childs disability affects his or her involvement and progress in the general curriculum
or participation in appropriate activities?
SPECIAL FACTORS
Did the IEP Team carefully consider all Special Factors that may influence the childs educational progress?
Are additional supports, assistive technology devices, special materials and equipment, etc. identified if needed?
Has the IEP Team carefully considered the childs communication and behavioral needs related to the Special
Factors identified?
What is the primary language and if an English Learner, have language development needs been addressed?
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
Instructional Materials
(teacher edition, student
texts, support materials,
enrichment)
Pacing Guide/
Curriculum Map/ Scope
and Sequence
Student Strengths
Extending
Page 1 of 1
Grade Level/Subject:
Instructional
Environment
Home/School
Communication
Site/Assignment
Orientation Checklist
Community Information
Extending
Contextualizing
Page 1 of 1
Self-Assessment
Universal Access: Equity for all Students (E-2.6)
responsive teaching
practices do you use to
overcome the effects of
bias?
communicate with
students, colleagues,
resource personnel and
families to provide
equitable access to the
state-adopted academic
content standards?
Evidence:
Communication:
- In what ways do you
Evidence:
Teaching Practice:
- What culturally
Evidence:
Inclusive Environments:
- In what ways do you
Page 1 of 1
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Class Profile; School and District Information/ Resources; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work; Classroom
Observations
Directions: With your support provider review and discuss the standards below referencing any information gained through Conversation Guides.
Name:
EMERGENCY CONTACTS
1. Local Emergency
911
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
4. Local EMS
_________________________
_________________________
6. School Nurse
_________________________
7. School Psychologist/Counselor
_________________________
8.
_________________________
9.
_________________________
_________________________
11.
_________________________
12.
_________________________
13.
_________________________
Table of Contents
Page #
I.
Introduction
II.
Health Education
a. Healthy Environment for Student Learning
2
2
III.
3
4
IV.
5
6
V.
VI.
8
9-10
11-12
13-14
15-16
17
18
19
20-21
VIII.
Fights at School
22
IX.
Child Abuse
a. Suspected Child Abuse Report Sample
23
24-25
X.
Substance Abuse
a. Definitions
b. Pharmacology
26
27-32
Nutrition
a. Nutrition Legislation
b. Nutritional Requirements for Your Toddler
c. Nutritional Requirements for Your Child
d. Nutrient Needs in Childhood
e. Nutritional Needs in Adolescents
33-34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41-42
XIII.
43-46
47
48-50
XIV.
Resources
51
XV.
References
52
VII.
XI.
XII.
Introduction
One of the most crucial responsibilities of the classroom teacher is to provide and
maintain a safe and healthy environment for teaching and learning. Teachers are guided
by numerous laws, regulations and policies, but preparation in the beginning years as
well as access to critical information is vital in enabling the teacher to be aware of and
appropriately respond to the wide array of health and safety issues present in todays
schools and classrooms.
This handbook is intended as a teacher desk reference. It is designed to include
important information about the health and safety issues which teachers are most likely to
encounter in their daily work lives with their students. Not all subjects, of course, are
covered, but references are provided to enable the teacher to research additional questions
and issues. As time passes, we hope that you will personalize and augment select
sections with information that is specific to your assignment(s), district, school, and
students.
In using this reference, always remember that this is a general resource and that
site and District policy and protocol may differ to some degree and, in fact, supercede the
suggestions made here. Teachers should be aware of their local regulations and know
how to respond accordingly.
We hope you find this resource helpful in the work you do with students. You
make a difference in the lives of many and your focus on health and safety will ensure
that children have the best care and support possible throughout their educational
experiences.
The Sacramento BTSA Consortium
Health/Safety-1
Health Education
All credentialed teachers in California are expected to appropriately use the adopted
health curriculum and know how to use instructional materials in health within the context of
their specific teaching assignment. The California Health Framework includes the traditional
content areas used in most other state and national comprehensive health education programs. It
provides students with opportunities to work individually and cooperatively to explore concepts
in depth and analyze and solve real life problems relating to health and safety.
The major goal of California Health Education is the development of health
literacy in all students. There are four unifying themes emphasized throughout the curriculum:
Acceptance of personal responsibility for personal lifelong health and the
incorporation of health-related knowledge into everyday behavior.
Respect for and promotion of the health of others and the understanding of the
relationship between individual behavior, personal well-being, and the health of the
environment.
An understanding of the processes of physical, mental, emotional, and social growth
and development.
Informed use of health-related information, products, and services.
A curriculum that addresses these unifying themes should include the following major content
areas:
Personal Health
Consumer and Community Health
Injury Prevention and Safety
Nutrition
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs
Environmental Health
Family Living
Individual Growth and Development
Communicable and Chronic Diseases
It is the responsibility of each school district and teacher to determine how these
concepts will be woven into each content area. As stated in the Health Framework for
California Public Schools, Unifying ideas should run through and connect the content
areas in a student-centered approach that makes instruction meaningful to students. A
well-designed health curriculum combines the four unifying areas with the content areas
in a continuing spiral of knowledge from kindergarten through grade twelve.
Health/Safety-2
When Creating a Supportive and Healthy Environment for Student Learning beginning teachers should
consider the following:
Implement accident prevention strategies within the classroom and the school site.
Know your role and can implement the school's crisis response plan accordingly.
Understand procedures for responding to emergency health situations & accidents.
Communicate with students' families regarding student health and safety, as needed.
Work with families, caregivers and health professionals.
Obtained or created an emergency first aid kit for my classroom.
Discuss with your Support Provider or district staff the guidelines regarding the following:
Nutrition:
9.
At-risk behaviors:
Health/Safety-3
Health/Safety-4
Reading
Level
ELD
CELDT
Level
# of years
in U.S.
schools
IEP/ 504
GATE
Identified Health
Concerns; Issues;
or Needs
Other Information/Comments;
Resources to access for this student
Age/
Grade
Primary
Lang.
Ethnicity
Student Name
CLASS PROFILE
5.
iv. The plan must provide personal protective equipment and require safety
training for all employees.
California Code 49480
a. Medication
i. The parent or legal guardian of any public school pupil on a
Continuing medication regimen for a nonepisodic1 condition, shall
inform the school nurse or other designated certificated school
employee of the medication being taken, the current dosage, and the name
of the supervising physician. With the consent of the parent or legal
guardian of the pupil, the school nurse may communicate with the
physician and may counsel with the school personnel regarding the
possible effects of the drug on the child's physical, intellectual, and social
behavior, as well as possible behavioral signs and symptoms of adverse
side effects, omission, or overdose. The superintendent of each school
district shall be responsible for informing parents of all pupils of the
requirements of this section.1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Episodic: A condition affecting the patient at irregular intervals and leaving him unaffected at
other times. The patient expects problems, but the onset may not be predictable. Brady,
Emergency Care, Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall, 1990.
Health/Safety-6
Health/Safety-7
Health/Safety-8
b. Your actions:
i. Do not move or straighten the area.
ii. Stabilize the injured area in the position it was found.
iii. Apply ice pack to area with thin barrier between ice and skin.
iv. Follow District protocol regarding EMS access and sending student to
nurse/office.
Health/Safety-10
Medical Conditions
EPILEPSY
Epilepsy is a chronic episodic disease most recognized by seizures. Epilepsy has a
variety of causes, but the cause in a specific patient is often very difficult to determine.
Epilepsy may produce two forms of seizures: a grand mal seizure characterized by convulsions,
or a petit mal seizure that does not produce convulsions. A petit mal seizure may go unnoticed
by everyone except the patient and people who know him/her well.
In grand mal seizures, the patient may first be aware of bright lights or a sudden burst of
colors and may also experience certain smells or tastes. This is often followed by convulsions,
lasting usually between one to two minutes, in which patients may injure themselves. This
convulsive phase is followed by a phase in which the convulsions stop and the patient slowly
regains consciousness.
The use of special medications usually allows most epileptics to live normal lives without
convulsions.
In the event of a grand mal seizure in the classroom, the teacher should:
Follow District protocol regarding accessing EMS.
Facilitate students leaving classroom or moving away from patient.
Place patient on the floor or ground. If possible, position for drainage from the
mouth.
Loosen restrictive clothing
Protect patient from injury but do NOT attempt to restrain the patient during
convulsions. (move things away from them)
When convulsions have ended, keep the patient at rest and positioned for drainage
from mouth.
Continue to protect the patient from embarrassment by asking for privacy and
reassuring and reorienting patient.
Communicate with health care professionals.
Health/Safety-11
DIABETES MELLITUS
During the process of digestion, food is converted into glucose, or blood sugar. As glucose
levels rise, the pancreas releases the hormone, Insulin. Insulin unlocks the bodys cells, allowing
glucose to enter and be converted to energy. Diabetes is a disease in which the pancreas does not
produce Insulin, or the body does not use it properly. When glucose cannot enter cells, it builds up in
the blood and the cells become starved for energy. Over time, high glucose levels may damage
organs and body systems including eyes, kidneys, nerves and heart.
Patients who are diabetic must consciously balance their food intake with their Insulin intake.
Young patients often find this difficult. Occasionally students may need to take oral or injectable
Insulin at school. Teachers should regularly ask these students when they last ate and when the last
took their Insulin. This will establish a baseline for comparison of behaviors and energy levels.
The teacher should follow District protocol regarding office/nurse contact if a student,
known to be a diabetic, exhibits any of the following:
Dry mouth and intense thirst
Gradually increasing restlessness and confusion followed by stupor
Dizziness and headache
Abnormal hostile or aggressive behavior
Fainting or convulsions
Patient intensely hungry
Skin pale, cold, and clammy with profuse sweating
ASTHMA
Asthma is a chronic disease that affects the airway. The airway is a system of tubes that
carries air in and out of the lungs. The airways of patients with asthma are inflamed and very
sensitive to allergens. In the presence of irritants or allergens, the sensitive airways become swollen
and narrow and mucous production increases, making it difficult for the patient to breathe.
During an asthma episode or attack, muscles around the airway tighten, further constricting
the passageway for air and may result in a medical emergency. The severity of asthma attacks varies
widely and, under extreme circumstances, can cause death.
Teachers should be aware of students in their classrooms with asthma, especially those who
have prescribed inhalers with them at school. The teacher should know where the student keeps the
inhaler and if there is one in the nurses office or other location.
Signs and symptoms of asthma include:
Coughing: Often worse at night or early in the morning, leading to sleep
deprivation.
Wheezing: A whistling or squeaky sound during breathing.
Chest tightness: Feels like a squeezing or pressure on chest.
Shortness of breath: Feeling breathless or out of breath.
More rapid and/or noisy breathing
During a suspected asthma attack, the teacher should:
Follow District protocol regarding accessing EMS and sending student to nurse/office.
Reassure and calm patient.
Assist patient in locating and taking any prescribed asthma medication.
Help patient into position of comfort.
Health/Safety-12
Health/Safety-13
HEARING
Children who suffer from hearing deficits often are delayed in language development as
well as other indicators of academic and interpersonal skills. Among young children, the
eustachian tube becomes longer, narrower, and more slanted, preventing fluid and bacteria from
traveling easily from ears to the throat. This condition, known as otitis media that, if left
untreated, can cause chronic ear infections leading to permanent hearing deficits. This condition
affects approximately 4 percent of the school-age population and 20% of students from families
of low socioeconomic status (Mott, James, & Sperhac, 1990).
The teacher should be aware of:
Unusual redness and warmth of ear
Child often tugs at earlobe of affected ear
Straining with forward leaning body
Asks teacher often to repeat or re-explain verbal instructions, especially if seated at
back of classroom.
Lack of involvement or engagement, especially if seated at back of classroom.
Distracted, especially if seated at back of classroom.
Teachers actions:
Talk with student to determine cause of behavior.
Discuss with school nurse if possible.
Discuss with family regarding hearing exam.
Continue to monitor students behavior and place appropriately in classroom.
Health/Safety-14
Head Lice
Head lice are parasitic insects that live in the hair and scalp of humans. The scientific name for head louse
is Pediculus humanus capitis. Another name for infestation with head lice is pediculosis. Head lice
develop in three forms: nits, nymphs, and adults.
Nits: Nits are head lice eggs. They are hard to see and are often mistaken for dandruff or droplets of
hairspray. Nits are found firmly attached to the hair shaft. They are oval and usually yellow to white. Nits
take about 1 week to hatch.
Nymphs: Nits hatch into nymphs. Nymphs are immature adult head lice. Nymphs mature into adults
about 7 days after hatching. To live, nymphs must feed on blood.
Adults: An adult louse is about the size of a sesame seed, has six legs, and is tan to greyish- white. In
persons with dark hair, adult lice will look darker. Adult lice can live up to 30 days on a person's head. To
live, adult lice need to feed on blood. If a louse falls off a person, it dies within 2 days.
Where are head lice found and who is at risk?
Head lice infestations occur worldwide. Anyone can get head lice. Pre-school- and elementary-schoolaged children and their families are infested most often. Girls get head lice more often than boys, and
women more often than men. Head lice is a very common condition, especially among children ages 310. As many as 6 million to 12 million people worldwide get head lice each year. Outbreaks of head lice
occur often in schools and group settings worldwide. Head lice is an increasing problem because licekilling medicines are becoming less effective?
How are head lice spread?
Head lice are spread easily from person to person by direct contact. People can get head lice by:
Coming into close contact with an already infested person. In children, contact is common during play,
while riding the school bus, and during classroom activities in which children sit in groups close to each
other. Wearing infested clothing, such as hats, scarves, coats, sports uniforms, or hair ribbons. Using
infested combs, brushes, or towels. Lying on a bed, couch, pillow, carpet, or stuffed animal that has been
contaminated. Lice do not jump or fly. Lice are not spread to humans from pets or other animals.
How is head lice infestation diagnosed?
Head lice infestation is diagnosed by looking closely through the hair and scalp for nits, nymphs, or adult
lice. Nits are the easiest to see. They are found "glued" to the hair shaft. Unlike dandruff or hairspray,
they will not slide along a strand of hair. If you find nits more than 1/4 inch from the scalp, the infection
is probably an old one. Nymphs and adults can be hard to find; there are usually few of them, and they
can move quickly from searching fingers. If lice are seen, finding nits close to the scalp confirms that a
person is infested. The symptoms of head lice are itching and irritability. If you are not sure if a person
has head lice, the diagnosis should be made by the local health department or a health-care provider,
school nurse, or agricultural extension service worker.
What is the treatment for head lice infestation?
Getting rid of head lice requires treating the individual, the family, and the household.
Treat the individual and the family -- This requires using an over-the-counter or prescription lice- killing
medicine. Treat only persons who are infested. Remember that all lice-killing products are pesticides.
Follow these treatment steps:
Remove all clothing.
Apply lice-killing medicine, also called pediculicide [peh-DICK-you-luh-side], according to label
instructions. If the affected person has extra-long hair, you may need to use a second bottle.
WARNING: Do not use a creme rinse or combination shampoo/conditioner before using lice-killing
medicine. Do not re-wash hair for 1-2 days after treatment.
Health/Safety-15
Health/Safety-16
Health/Safety-17
BIPOLAR DISORDER
Bipolar disorder, also called manic-depressive illness, is a serious mental illness that
causes extreme mood swings between a manic and a depressive phase. It affects persons of all
ages and appears to have a genetic component.
Persons with bipolar disorder may feel euphoric, full of energy, unwilling to rest, and
able to do anything during the manic phase. During the depressive phase, individuals may be
overwhelmed with sadness and completely lacking in energy or desire to do anything. Patients
cycle between these phases over days or weeks. As with depression, the most effective treatment
seems to be a combination of medication and psychotherapy.
Teachers should consult with families and follow site and district protocol
regarding referral to site-based mental health professionals if any of the following signs and
symptoms appear:
Manic Phase:
Feeling very irritable and angry
Thinking and talking so fast that people cant follow.
Insomnia
Feeling very powerful and important
Trouble with concentration
Substance abuse
Having unprotected sex
Depressive Phase:
No interest or pleasure in past enjoyable activities.
Feeling sad or numb
Crying easily or for no reason
Feeling slowed down, restless, or irritable
Feeling worthless or guilty
Change in appetite and/or unintended change in weight
Trouble recalling things, concentrating, or decision making
Headaches, backaches, or digestive problems
Sleep problems; wanting to sleep all the time
Health/Safety-18
SCHIZOPHRENIA
Schizophrenia is a psychiatric diagnosis that describes a mental disorder characterized by
impairments in the perception or expression of reality and by significant social or occupational
dysfunction. A person experiencing schizophrenia is typically characterized as demonstrating
disorganized thinking, and as experiencing delusions or hallucinations, in particular auditory
hallucinations.
Schizophrenia is a serious illness for which early diagnosis and medical treatment are
crucial. Although causes are not specifically known, research suggests that brain chemistry,
environment, and genetics play an important role. The disease usually manifests during the early
teenage years and peaks during the ages of 15 to 30. Males usually show signs and symptoms
earlier in this range than females. Medications as well as coordinated mental health services help
families manage and cope with the effects of the disease to facilitate recovery.
Although childhood schizophrenia is essentially the same brain disorder as in adults, the
early age of onset presents special considerations for diagnosis, treatment, educational needs,
emotional and social development, family relationships, and other factors.
Teachers should consult with families and follow site and district protocol regarding
referral to site-based mental health professionals if two or more of the following signs and
symptoms appear during a one-month period:
Seeing and hearing things that are not real (visual and auditory hallucinations)
Extreme moodiness
Odd behavior
Health/Safety-19
EATING DISORDERS
Each year millions of people in the United States develop serious and sometimes lifethreatening eating disorders. The vast majority, more than 90 percent, of those afflicted with
eating disorders are adolescent and young adult women. One reason that females in this age
group are particularly vulnerable to eating disorders is their tendency to go on strict diets to
achieve an ideal figure imposed on them by our current cultural values emphasizing thinness.
The consequences of these disorders can be extremely severe, leading to death from starvation,
cardiac arrest, or suicide in approximately 10% of cases.
Treatment for eating disorders typically involves a treatment team of an internist, a
nutritionist, psychotherapists (individual and group) and a psychopharmacologist. The
prognosis for successful recovery is directly related to early diagnosis and treatment.
Anorexia Nervosa:
People who intentionally starve themselves suffer from an eating disorder called anorexia
nervosa. The disorder usually begins in young people around the time of puberty and involves
extreme weight loss, at least 15% below the persons normal body weight. Many people with
this disorder are immediately recognized by their emaciated appearance, but remain convinced
they are overweight. This distorted body image is typical of anorexic patients. They may also
develop strange rituals as a part of their eating behavior. In the restrictive type, patients severely
restrict their food intake. In the purge type, patients not only restrict food intake, but also purge
(vomit) after meals to eliminate any nutritional benefit of the meal. Loss of monthly menstrual
periods is typical of females with this disorder.
Bulimia Nervosa:
People with bulimia nervosa consume large amounts of food and them purge their bodies
of the excel calories by vomiting, abusing laxatives or diuretics, taking enemas, and/or exercising
obsessively. Many individuals binge and purge secretly and maintain normal or above normal
body weight. This behavior enables them to successfully hide their problem from family,
friends, or teachers for months or years. Dieting heavily between episodes of binging and
purging is common. Eventually, approximately half of those with anorexia will develop bulimia.
As with anorexia, bulimia typically begins during adolescence. Most patients are
ashamed of their strange habits and do not seek help until they reach their 30s or 40s. By this
time, the behavior is deeply ingrained and extremely difficult to change.
Health/Safety-20
Teachers should consult with families and follow site and district protocol regarding
referral to site-based mental health professionals if any of the following signs and symptoms
appear:
Loss of body weight (exceeding 15% below normal body weight)
Obsessive concern with weight
Distorted body image; feels overweight even though extremely thin
Obsessive dieting and/or exercising
Unusual rituals around eating
Unnecessary use of laxatives or diuretics
Childhood Obesity:
The National Center for Health Statistics identifies approximately 15% of children in the
United States as obese. In children or adults, chronic excess weight can lead to physical
problems, but in children, of special concern are the psychological consequences. Adults have
developed ways of coping with the humiliation that our society attaches to being overweight.
For children, however, teasing by peers as well as pressure from parents and the media are often
damaging to self-esteem. This problem is particularly acute for females. With males, low selfesteem is more often associated with being to thin than with being overweight (Pierce & Wardle,
1993).
Treatment for childhood obesity often includes emphasis on two strategies:
Use of leisure time; physical exercise vs. sedentary activity
Dietary considerations
Parents are usually involved in treatment from the beginning and their cooperation has a great
influence on the child returning to and maintaining a normal weight (Foreyt & Goodrick, 1993).
Teachers should consult with families and follow site and district protocol
regarding referral to site-based mental health professionals if any of the following signs and
symptoms appear:
Child is noticeably overweight; body weight more than 20% above normal
Childs use of leisure time is primarily sedentary
Child resists physical exercise and activity
Childs diet very high in starches and sugars
Any observed indicators of low self-esteem
Health/Safety-21
Fights at School
The maintenance of a safe classroom environment includes recognition of potentially
unsafe interpersonal behavior. Teachers should be aware of any potential violence and develop
strategies to prevent fighting. However, occasionally, children do get into fights. In responding
to fights in the classroom, teachers must be aware of site and District protocol and their actions
should always be compatible with these regulations. Teachers should know their students and be
able to judge the probability of escalation of violence, the presence of a weapon, and other
factors which may influence their response.
While there is no strategy that always works for diffusing physical violence at school, the
following guidelines are often effective:
1. As you approach the combatants, yell out in a loud and firm voice: Its over! This
usually diffuses the situation.
2. If the fight continues and you decide to physically intervene, determine the aggressor
and step in with your back to him/her. Continue to talk as you move the less aggressive
student away. DONT put your hands on either student! If the involved students are over
the age of 8, you believe there is a chance of escalation, a weapon may be present, your
safety is in jeopardy, or district protocol prohibits this response, dont step in.
3. Have students clear the room or immediate area and ask someone, preferably a classroom
aid or trusted student, to send for an administrator.
4. Keep combatants separated.
5. Provide (or call for) first aid if necessary.
6. Escort combatants to the office separately.
7. Debrief with administrator.
8. Follow site and district policy regarding parent notification.
9. Conduct follow-up meetings with combatants individually and together as
soon as possible.
Health/Safety-22
Child Abuse
The abuse and maltreatment of children is an extremely serious problem in todays
American society. Research suggests that it is related to factors within the family, community,
and larger culture. Child and parent characteristics often interact to product abusive behavior,
and the results of this abuse are often evident at school.
Because they are designated as mandated reporters of child abuse, it is extremely
important that teachers become adept at recognizing the signs of child abuse, be able to discuss
this issue with their students, and be thoroughly informed as to the proper reporting procedures
and agencies to contact. Teachers should also be thoroughly aware and practiced in their site and
districts reporting policies and follow them at all times. For example, protocol may include
initially reporting suspected incidents of abuse to a supervisor followed by designated
procedures.
The Child Abuse: Educators Responsibilities handbook, provides a comprehensive
information source on these critical topics. The handbook can be found at www.safestate.org.
Health/Safety-23
Health/Safety-24
Health/Safety-25
Substance Abuse
Basic definitions
Substance Use
The ingestion of psychoactive substances in moderate amounts that does not significantly interfere with
social, educational, or occupational functioning.
Substance Abuse
A maladaptive pattern of substance use, although not outright dependence, leading to clinically significant
impairment or distress, as evidenced by one or more of the following during a 1-year period:
Recurrent substance use causing a failure to fulfill work, school, or family obligations.
Recurrent substance use in situations that are physically hazardous (e.g., driving).
Recurrent legal problems related to substance abuse.
Continued substance use despite having persistent or recurring social or interpersonal problems caused
or made worse by the use of the substance.
Substance Dependence (Addiction)
A maladaptive pattern of substance use characterized by the following elements:
Tolerance: The need for increased amounts of a substance to achieve the desired effect, and a
diminished effect with continued use of the same amount.
Withdrawal: Severely negative physiological responses to discontinued use of a psychoactive
substance. These reactions can be alleviated by the same or similar substance.
A history of unsuccessful efforts to control substance use.
A preoccupation with efforts to seek and obtain the substance.
Substance Related Disorders
Substance abuse resulting in behavior that is deviant, maladaptive, and personally distressful. Any or all of
the following may be present:
Patient cannot meet his/her needs.
Patient is generally distressed.
Patient is not reality-based
Signs vs. Symptoms
Sign: Any observed evidence of injury, illness, medical condition, or mental state.
Symptom: Evidence of injury, illness, medical condition, or mental state reported to you by the
patient.
Health/Safety-26
DEPRESSANTS
Psychoactive substances, which decrease central nervous system activity. Their principal
effect is to reduce levels of physiological arousal and induce relaxation.
Alcohol [Neurotransmitter-GABA(gammaaminobutyric acid)]
Clinical Description
Although alcohol is a depressant, its initial effect is an apparent stimulation. The user
generally experiences a feeling of well-being, reduction of inhibitions and an ease in exhibiting
outgoing behavior. These symptoms are due to the depression of the inhibitory centers in the
brain. With continued drinking, however, alcohol depresses more areas of the brain which
impeded its ability to function properly. Motor coordination is impaired, reaction time is slowed,
judgment is impaired, vision and hearing can be negatively affected, and confusion can be
evident. Severe intoxication can result in stupor or coma.
Metabolism
After ingestion, alcohol passes through the esophagus and into the stomach where small
amounts are absorbed. From there most of it travels to the small intestine where it is easily
absorbed into the bloodstream and eventually contacts every major organ. Some of the alcohol
goes to the lungs where it vaporizes and is exhaled. This can be detected using breath analyzers.
As alcohol passes through the liver, it is metabolized and broken down into carbon dioxide and
water by specific enzymes. An average person is able to metabolize about 7to 10 grams of
alcohol per hour, an amount comparable to approximately one glass of beer or 1 ounce of 90
proof spirits (Moak & Anton, 1999).
Effects of Chronic Abuse
Withdrawal from chronic alcohol use typically includes hand tremors and, within several
hours, nausea or vomiting, anxiety, transient hallucinations, agitation, insomnia, and at its most
extreme, withdrawal delirium (frightening hallucinations accompanied by body tremors).
Consequences of long term excessive drinking include liver disease, pancreatitis, cardiovascular
disorders, and brain damage.
The effects of alcohol abuse extend beyond the health and well being of the drinker. For
example, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) is now generally recognized as a combination of
problems that can occur in a child whose mother drank during her pregnancy. These problems
include fetal growth retardation, cognitive deficits, behavior problems, and learning difficulties
(Finnegan & Kandall, 1997). In addition, children with FAS often have characteristic facial
features.
Health/Safety-27
STIMULANTS
Psychoactive substances that increase central nervous system activity elevate mood,
activity, and alertness. (Neurotransmitters-Norepinephrine, Dopamine)
Amphetamines
[Benzedrine, Dexedrine, Methamphetamine, Ritalin, MDMA (Ecstasy)]
Clinical Description
At low doses, amphetamines can induce feelings of elation and vigor, and can reduce
fatigue. However, after a period of elevation, this is followed by a crash period of depression
and fatigue. Amphetamines are prescribed for Narcolepsy and for children with Attention
Deficit /Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Because amphetamines reduce appetite as well as
increase general activity levels, they are often taken for weight loss.
Signs and symptoms of amphetamine intoxication include significant behavioral
symptoms, such as euphoria or affective blunting, changes in sociability, interpersonal
sensitivity, anxiety, tension, anger, stereotyped behaviors, rapid speech, impaired judgment, and
impaired social or occupational functioning. Physiological signs and symptoms occur shortly
after ingestion and include elevation of heart rate and blood pressure, perspiration and/or chills,
nausea and/or vomiting, dilated pupils, weight loss, dry mouth, muscular weakness, respiratory
depression, chest pain, seizures, or coma.
Effects of Chronic Abuse
Chronic abuse, severe intoxication, and overdose of these substances can cause
hallucinations, panic, agitation, and paranoid delusions. Amphetamine tolerance builds quickly,
increasing addictive potential. Withdrawal often results in apathy, prolonged periods of sleep,
irritability, and depression.
Cocaine [Alkaloid or Free Base (Crack)]
Clinical Description
Similar to the amphetamines, in small amounts, cocaine increases alertness, produces
euphoria, and increases blood pressure and can cause elevated and irregular heart rate. It also
causes insomnia and loss of appetite. Users also report feelings of empowerment, invincibility,
and self-confidence. Rapid, energized speech and high levels of sociability are often observed.
The effects usually last no longer than an hour, and more has to be taken to maintain the high.
With repeated use, paranoia and exaggerated fears become evident in about 67% of abusers
()Franklin & Frances, 1999).
Effects of Chronic Abuse
Cocaine dependence comes on slowly, not becoming apparent until 2 to 5 years after
initial use (Gawin & Kleber, 1992). Although few negative effects are initially noted, with
continued use, sleep is disrupted, increased tolerance causes a need for higher doses, paranoia
and other negative symptoms set in, and the cocaine user gradually becomes socially isolated.
Withdrawal from cocaine is characterized by pronounced feelings of apathy and
boredom, leading to resumption of cocaine abuse. This atypical withdrawal pattern originally
misled people into believing that cocaine was not addictive. We now know that cocaine abusers
go through a pattern of tolerance and withdrawal similar to other psychoactive drugs (Gawin &
Kleber, 1992).
Health/Safety-29
Nicotine (Neurotransmitter-Acetylcholine)
Clinical Description
Nicotine in small doses stimulates the central nervous system. It can also relieve stress
and improve mood. Physiological signs from small doses include elevated heart rate and blood
pressure. High doses can result in blurred vision, confusion, convulsions, and occasionally,
death. Today, almost one quarter of Americans smoke, which is down from 42.4% who
identified themselves as smokers in 1965 (Schmitz et al., 1997). There has not been a
comparable decline in teenagers and young adults. Smoking has been linked with signs of
negative affect, such as depression, anxiety and anger (Hall, Munoz, et al.,1993). Many people
who quit smoking but later resume, report that feelings of depression were a factor in the relapse
(Slade, 1999).
Effects of Chronic Use
Nicotine is a highly addictive substance. Withdrawal signs and symptoms include
depressed mood, insomnia, irritability, anxiety, difficulty concentrating, restlessness, and
increased appetite and weight gain. Severe depression is found to occur significantly more often
among people with nicotine dependence (Breslau, Kilbey & Anderson, 1993). There is a welldocumented link between long-term tobacco use and chronic hypertension, heart disease, chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (emphysema and chronic bronchitis), and cancer (Slade, 1999).
Some evidence indicates that nicotine may affect the fetal brain and growth patterns (Kandel,
Wu, & Davies, 1994).
Cigarette smoking increases the risk of peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease,
cerebrovascular disease and graft occlusion after reconstructive arterial surgery. Smoking also
increases LDL and decreases HDL levels and can result in hypoxia due to elevated blood levels
of carbon monoxide as well as vasoconstriction of arteries already narrowed by atherosclerosis.
Elevated blood viscosity and more rapid clotting time are also often seen in chronic cigarette
smokers.
Smoking Cessation
Most smokers who quit do so for health reasons of economic reasons. Most smokers do
not realize that, on average, 7 minutes of life are lost with each cigarette smoked. Depending of
the age that a person begins to smoke, or stops, approximately 7 to 13 years of life are lost due to
smoking-related diseases.
Although approximately 70% of smokers consult their physician at least once per year for
some reason, many have never been asked about smoking or been advised to quit. Of patients
who quit, 90% do so on their own. But in any given year, only about 1.7 million smokers (3.6%)
successfully quit. Studies have shown that a physicians advice to stop smoking, which requires
only about 3 to 5 minutes, may achieve a quit rate of 3-5%. However, when the physicians
advice is supported with follow-up visits and drugs, quit rates of 20 to 25% may be expected
(Merck, 1999).
Smokers trying to quit go through stages: precontemplation, contemplation, action, and
maintenance. The precontemplation stage is usually not recognized by the patient. Smokers in
the contemplation stage (planning how to quit) can usually benefit from a physicians assistance.
Selecting a quit date, changing the smoking habit pattern through behavior modification, and
quitting cold turkey are important sequential steps. Physicians and other social supporters
must teach and encourage maintenance of a smoking-free state and relapse prevention.
Health/Safety-30
Many tobacco addicts relapse after the first attempt at smoking cessation. Five to seven
failures commonly precede success. Failure should not be regarded as an indication of futility.
The more often a patient makes a serious attempt to quit smoking, the more likely the patients
ultimate success. (Merck, 1999).
Weight gain is a common concern, particularly in women who may use tobacco as a
weight control measure because it suppresses appetite and slightly increases the basal metabolic
rate. The average weight gain in women over the first six months of cessation is about 10 lbs.
Dietary consultation, nicotine replacement, and increased exercise along with smoking cessation
can help prevent weight gain. Exercise may also reduce the craving for tobacco.
MARIJUANA
The most routinely used illegal substance; with 66.5 million Americans reporting they
have tried marijuana and 5.5 million saying they smoke it at least weekly (Roffman & Stephens,
1993).
Clinical Description
Reactions to marijuana usually include mood swings. Otherwise normal experiences
seem extremely funny, or characterized by a dreamlike state where time seems to stand still.
Users often report heightened sensory experiences, seeing vivid colors, or appreciating the
subtleties of music. Marijuana can produce diverse reactions in different people. It is not
uncommon for someone to report having no reaction to the first use of the drug. Evidence
suggests that people can override behavioral effects if sufficiently motivated (Iversen, 2000).
Effect of Chronic Use
The feelings of well-being produced by small doses can change to dizziness, paranoia,
and hallucinations when larger doses are taken. Research on frequent marijuana users suggests
that impairment of memory, concentration, motivation, self-esteem and interpersonal
relationships may result from long-term use. Employment and education are often affected
(Haas & Hendin, 1987). The impairment in motivation (antimotivational syndrome) manifests
itself in apathy, or unwillingness to carry out long-term plans.
The evidence for marijuana tolerance is contradictory. Some chronic users report
tolerance to the euphoric high, others report reverse tolerance. Major signs and symptoms of
withdrawal do not usually occur with marijuana. Chronic users who discontinue use report a
period of irritability, restlessness, appetite loss, nausea, and difficulty sleeping (B.A. Johnson,
1991), but no evidence suggests they experience a craving and psychological dependence
characteristic of other substances (Grinspoon & Bakalar, 1997).
HALLUCINOGENS
[LSD (d-lysergic acid diethylamide), psilocybin, mescaline,
DMT (dimethyltryptamine), PCP (phenecyclidine)
Neurotransmitters-Serotonin or Norepinephrine
Any psychoactive substance that can produce delusions, hallucinations, paranoia and
altered sensory perception.
Clinical Description
The diagnostic criteria for hallucinogen intoxication are similar to marijuana but may be
more intense. Signs and symptoms include perceptual changes such as subjective intensification
of perceptions, depersonalization and hallucinations. Physiological signs include pupillary
Health/Safety-31
dilation, rapid heart rate, sweating and blurred vision (American Psychiatric Association, 2000).
Hallucinations may be situational or literal.
Effects of Chronic Abuse
Tolerance develops quickly to a number of the hallucinogens including LSD, psilocybin,
and mescaline (Pechnick & Ungerleider, 1997). If taken repeatedly over a period of days, these
drugs completely loose their effectiveness. However, sensitivity returns after approximately one
week of abstinence. For most of the hallucinogens, no withdrawal signs or symptoms have been
reported. However, there is evidence of long-term psychotic reactions and flashbacks.
ANABOLIC-ANDROGENIC STEROIDS
Specific substances derived or synthesized from the hormone, testosterone.
Clinical Description
The legitimate medical uses of these drugs focus on patients with asthma, anemia, breast
cancer, and males with inadequate sexual development. However, the anabolic action of these
drugs has resulted in their illicit use by individuals who want to increase their body mass and
improve their physical abilities and performance. Steroids can be taken orally or through
injection on a schedule of several weeks or months followed by a break from its use (cycling).
Several types of steroids can be combined in a process known as stacking.
Effects of Chronic Abuse
Steroid use differs from other drug use because the substances does not produce a
desirable high but instead is used to enhance physical performance and body size. Dependence
seems to involve the desire to maintain the performance gained rather than to achieve an altered
emotional or physical state. Chronic abuse often results in depression, anxiety, and panic attacks
(Pandina & Hendren). Chronic use can also be associated with episodes of rage and violence.
There is also evidence of causal links to liver and kidney damage as well as genital
abnormalities.
INHALANTS
A variety of substances found in volatile solvents, making them available to be directly
inhaled into the lungs.
Clinical Description
Among the more common inhalants abused include spray paint, hairspray, paint thinner,
gasoline, amyl nitrate, nitrous oxide, nail polish remover, felt-tipped markers, airplane glue,
contact cement, dry cleaning fluid, and spot remover. Inhalant use is most common among
young, economically disadvantaged males, ages 13 to 15 (Frances, 1999). Inhaling the substance
from a container or cloth results in rapid absorption into the bloodstream through the lungs. The
high associated with inhalant use resembles that of alcohol intoxication and usually includes
dizziness, slurred speech, lack of muscle coordination, euphoria, and lethargy.
Effects of Chronic Abuse
Inhalant users develop a tolerance to the substance. Discontinued use results in signs and
symptoms of withdrawal that include sleep disturbances, tremors, irritability, and nausea.
Chronic, prolonged use can lead to increase in aggressive and antisocial behavior as well as
permanent damage to bone marrow, kidney, liver, and brain (Franklin & Frances, 1999).
Changes in heart rhythm can occur and can lead to death.
Health/Safety-32
Nutrition
Nutritional and caloric intake are of primary importance to health, and classroom teachers
should be aware of the nutritional requirements of their students and the effect food intake has on
learning. Nutrition and availability of foods in the school setting are guided by federal and state
legislation, school policy, and family values.
When and what foods students eat have an effect on mental activity and energy level, and
hence on learning. Developmental processes and priorities change during childhood and
adolescence, and are accompanied by different nutritional requirements.
A well-balanced diet is essential to ensure proper bone, muscle, and organ development during
childhood. Some foods can cause an adverse interaction with certain medications, and can cause
allergic reactions, and illnesses.
Classroom teachers must take these factors into consideration when planning lessons and
activities, and regularly monitor students with regard to nutrition.
Nutrition Legislation
California Code
38085. A minimum of 50 percent of the items, other than foods reimbursed under Chapters 13
(commencing with Section 1751) and 13A (commencing with Section 1771) of Title 42 of the
United States Code, offered for sale each schoolday at any schoolsite by any entity or
organization during regular school hours shall be selected from the following list:
(a) Milk and dairy products, including cheese, yogurt, frozen yogurt, and ice cream.
(b) Full-strength fruit and vegetable juices and fruit drinks containing 50 percent or more fullstrength fruit juice, and fruit nectars containing 35 percent or more full-strength fruit juice.
(c) Fresh, frozen, canned, and dried fruits and vegetables.
(d) Nuts, seeds, and nut butters.
(e) Nonconfection grain products, as defined by regulation of the United States Food and Drug
Administration, including crackers, bread sticks, tortillas, pizza, pretzels, bagels, muffins, and
popcorn.
(f) Meat, poultry, and fish, and their products, including beef jerky, tacos, meat turnovers,
pizza, chili and sandwiches.
(g) Legumes and legume products, including bean burritos, chili beans, bean dip, roasted soy
beans, and soups.
Health/Safety-33
(h) Any foods which would qualify as one of the required food components of the Type A
lunch which is defined in and reimbursable under the National School Lunch Act (Chapter 13
(commencing with Section 1751) of Title 42 of the United States Code).
For the purposes of this section, "item" shall be defined as each separate kind of food offered for
sale as a separate unit.
49590. The State Department of Education shall ensure that the nutrition levels of meals served
to schoolage children pursuant to the National School Lunch Act be of the highest quality and
greatest nutritional value possible.
49512. The Department of Education, in cooperation with the Department of Social Welfare,
shall establish a statewide program to provide nutritious meals at school for pupils. Either or
both of such departments may cooperate with and enter into contracts with the United States
Departments of Health, Education and Welfare and Agriculture in order to implement the
provisions of this article.
The funds shall be allocated to the school districts in such a manner that priority shall be given to
providing free meals to the neediest children.
Steps:
1. Serve kid-pleasing, protein-rich foods like scrambled eggs, smoothies made with tofu, baked
chicken legs and bean soups. Toddlers need 16 grams of protein a day.
2. Build those tiny bones with 500mg of calcium a day. Toddlers can get that much from two (8oz.) cups of milk.
3. Drink up milk for vitamin D, too. Young children need 400 IU per day.
4. Pump up the iron in your toddler's diet with lean meats, poultry, fish, dried beans and whole
grains. Little ones need 10mg of iron every day.
5. Beef up on zinc with (you guessed it) beef and other zinc-rich foods like poultry, fish, eggs,
beans, whole grain breads, crackers and cereals. Toddlers need 10mg of zinc per day.
6. Snack on oranges, kiwi, cantaloupe or strawberries. These yummy fruits are rich in vitamin C,
and toddlers need 40mg per day.
7. Crunch carrots for vitamin A. Kids can get the needed 400mcg per day from carrots and other
orange fruits and vegetables.
Tips:
Pieces of meat are dry, tough and hard for toddlers to chew. Offer ground meats instead, in
casseroles, soups and pasta sauce.
Serve whole cow's milk until age 2, then slowly wean down to skim.
Toddlers who shy away from milk can get their calcium from yogurt, kefir, cheese or fortified
soy milk.
Offer fruits and/or vegetables at every meal or snack to make sure your child eats at least five
servings a day.
Warnings:
Toddlers are notoriously picky eaters. Your job is to serve the healthy food. Your child's job is to
eat it (or not eat it if he chooses). Look at your child's diet over several days or a week, to see if
he meets his nutrient requirements on average.
How to know the Nutritional Requirements for Your Toddler eHow.com
Health/Safety-35
Steps:
1. Start every day with breakfast. A quick bowl of cold whole-grain cereal or instant oatmeal with raisins
is a nutritious start. Breakfast is a great time to add fiber, calcium, iron and zinc to your child's diet.
2. Dish up two servings of protein-rich foods every day. Four- to six-year-olds need 24 grams of protein a
day, and seven- to ten-year-olds need 28 grams.
3. Add calcium and strength to kids' bones by offering three to four servings of calcium-rich foods every
day. Children four- to eight-years-old need 800mg of calcium. Nine- to thirteen-year-olds need 1,300mg.
4. Send kids out to play. A few minutes of sunshine on the skin produces vitamin D. Vitamin D is also
found in milk. Kids need 5mcg of vitamin D per day.
5. Dig into iron-rich lean meats, poultry, fish, dried beans and whole grains. Kids need 10mg of iron
every day.
6. Serve sweet, vitamin A-rich veggies. Carrots and sweet potatoes are some kids' favorites. Children ages
four to six need 500mcg, and seven- to ten-year-olds need 700mcg of vitamin A per day.
7. Fall back on fruit. Serve vitamin C-rich blueberries, oranges, kiwi, cantaloupe and strawberries. Kids
need 45mg of vitamin C a day.
Tips:
A serving of protein-rich food could be 2 oz. of meat, fish or poultry, 3 tbsp. peanut butter, 3/4 c. tofu, 1/2
c. tuna, 2 eggs or 1 c. cooked beans. Each of these provide about 14 grams of protein.
A serving of calcium-rich food might be 1 c. (8 oz.) milk, 1 c. yogurt, kefir, fortified soy milk or fortified
orange juice, or 1 1/2 oz. cheese. All these offer about 300mg of calcium.
Offer fruits and vegetables at every meal or snack to make sure your child averages five or more servings
a day.
Keep offering broccoli, chard, asparagus and other vegetables, even if kids only take a taste. Eventually,
they will learn to like those nutritious veggies.
Warnings:
Some school-age kids continue to be picky eaters. As the parent, your job is to serve nutritious food. Your
child's job is to eat it (or not). Look at your child's diet over several days or a week to see if, on average,
he or she meets the nutrient requirements.
Tips from eHow Users:
Hidden veggies for veggie-haters
Most kids will eat a burger without asking what's in it. Make your own veggie burger patties and they'll
never know they ate 5 kinds of veggies they say they hate.
Health/Safety-36
Vitamin D: This nutrient is required for calcium absorption and also for its deposition in the
bones. The dietary requirement depends on other factors such as amount of exposure to sunlight.
Fortified milk serves as a good source of Vitamin D.
Iron: The risk for deficiency is very high during infancy and childhood. Care should be taken to
provide adequate intakes after consideration of factors such as absorbability from plant foods etc.
Calcium: It plays a very vital role in the mineralization of bone and then maintenance of bone
mass.
Recommendations:
1 to 3-year-old
500 mg/day
4 to 8-year-old
800 mg/day
1. Mahan, Kathleen L.; Escott-Stump, Sylvia. Krauses Food, Nutrition, & Diet Therapy,
10th ed. "Nutrition in Childhood" by Betty Lucas, MPH, RD, CD. W.B. Saunders Co.,
Philadelphia.
How to know the Nutritional Requirements for Your Child eHow.com
Health/Safety-37
Health/Safety-38
Universal Precautions
UNIVERSAL PRECAUTIONS are precautions used in all situations and not limited to use with individuals
known to be carrying a specific virus such as HIV or the virus causing Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C. In the
school setting, those precautions should include; hand washing, using gloves, careful trash disposal, using
disinfectants, and modification of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Handwashing
Thorough hand washing is the single most important factor in preventing the spread of infectious diseases
and should be practiced routinely by all school personnel and taught to students as routine hygiene practice.
1. All staff should wash their hands in the following circumstances:
Before handling food, drinking, eating or smoking
After toileting
After contact with body fluids or items soiled with body fluids
After touching or caring for students, especially those with nose, mouth, or other discharge
2. Scheduling time for students to wash hands before eating is suggested to encourage the practice.
3. How to wash hands: Wet hands with running water and apply soap from dispenser. Lather well and
wash vigorously for fifteen to twenty seconds. Soap suspends easily removing soil and
microorganisms, allowing them to be washed off. Running water is necessary to carry away dirt and
debris. Rinse well under running water with water draining from wrist to fingertips. Leave water
running. Dry hands well with a paper towel and then turn off the faucet with the paper towel. Discard
towel. Antibacterial gel can be used as a temporary method to sanitize hands until thorough hand
washing can be done.
4. Classroom instruction about proper hand washing can be integrated into health instruction at all
grade levels.
Health/Safety-39
Trash Disposal
1. Place soiled tissues, pad, gauze bandages, towels, etc., into plastic bag and tie or seal the bag. Place it
in a second plastic bag and leave sealed.
2. If needles, syringes, or lancets are used in the school setting, arrange for a puncture-proof container.
Place intact needles and syringes in the designated container. Do not bend or break needles. Do not
recap needles. Contact your local Health Department for directions about disposal of contaminated
materials.
Using Disinfectants
1. Environmental surfaces contaminated with body fluids should be cleaned promptly with disposable
towels and approved disinfectant. Disposable gloves should be worn. Disposable items should be
discarded in a plastic-lined wastebasket. Mop solution used to clean bodily fluid spills should consist
of the approved disinfectant. Used mops should be soaked in this solution 30 minutes and rinsed
thoroughly before re-using.
2. After clean up, remove gloves and wash hands.
3. If carpet is soiled, clean up immediately and disinfect with District approved disinfectant.
RISK OF EXPOSURE WITH HIV AND HEPATITIS B VIRUS
WITH EXPOSURE TO VARIOUS VOLUMES OR INFECTED BLOOD
Type of Exposure
Volume of Blood
500 cc (1 unit or 1 pint)
Hepatitis B
Virus (HBV)
100%
0-.03%
12-35.0
Some risk
No reported
cases
Some risk
Some health care workers have been infected with HBV in absence of needle stick. Presumable,
those infections were acquired by blood transfers to oral or nasal mucous membranes via the hands
No family members have contracted HIV infection unless they were themselves at risk because of
sexual activity, inoculation with blood products and perinatal events.
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) transmission has occurred between babies and their family contacts,
infected developmentally delayed children and their classmates and caregivers, and in other
situations when chronic carriers are present for prolonged periods.
Health/Safety-40
The spread of Hepatitis B may occasionally occur in special education settings and classrooms
attended by developmentally delayed students who became Hepatitis B carriers while in hospital or
residential facilities. The risk of Hepatitis transmission in these special education classroom settings
can be almost eliminated by good environmental and personal hygiene (Universal Precautions).
Hepatitis B vaccination of susceptible personnel and students can reduce the risk to virtually zero.
WHAT IS AIDS/HIV INFECTION?
AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) is the advanced stage of HIV (Human Immunodeficiency
Virus) infection. The virus attacks the bodys immune system, leaving it vulnerable to life-threatening
opportunistic infections and malignancies. The virus also may directly attack the central nervous system.
Persons infected with HIV frequently have no apparent symptoms and usually appear to be in good health.
More than half of the persons in the United States who have been diagnosed to have AIDS (the advanced
stage of HIV infection) have died.
HOW IS HIV INFECTION SPREAD?
The possibility that AIDS/HIV will be transmitted in schools, the workplace and other public gatherings is
remote. AIDS/HIV infection is not transmitted from one person to another through everyday activities. You
will not get AIDS by being around or working with a person who is infected or by having ordinary daily
contact with an HIV infected person.
Everyone infected with HIV, even a person without apparent symptoms, is capable of transmitting the
infection. HIV infection is transmitted by:
1. Any sexual activity involving direct contact with semen, blood or vaginal secretion of someone who
is infected.
2. Sharing intravenous (IV) needles and/or syringes with someone who is infected.
3. Penetrating the skin with needles that have been used to inject an infected person.
4. Direct contact on broken skin with infected blood.
5. Receiving blood transfusion or blood products from someone who is infected (a screening test has
been used since 1985 that has reduced the risk to 1 in 68,000 in California (AIDS Update, Dec.
1988)).
6. Being born to an infected mother.
WHAT IS HEPATITIS B?
Hepatitis B is an infection of the liver caused by a virus present in blood and other body fluids of infected
persons. Less than 50 percent of persons who became infected show symptoms of illness. The symptoms are
like those of Hepatitis A and include fatigue, mild fever, muscle or joint aches, nausea, vomiting, loss of
appetite, and abdominal pain. In some patients, the urine turns dark and the skin becomes yellow. The onset
of symptoms may appear 6 weeks to 6 months after becoming infected with the virus. Death is uncommon in
Hepatitis B but 5 to 10 percent of those infected become long-term virus carriers. Up to 25 percent of carriers
may develop serious chronic liver disease.
Health/Safety-41
Back Injuries
Health/Safety-43
Potential
Hazards
Being Hit by Falling
Objects, Caught In or
Between Objects
Fire Injury
Electrical Shock
Injuries
Equip all cabinets with doors with a device, other than magnets, to prevent
doors from opening in the event of an earthquake
Secure stored material with shelf lips or other means
Reduce high storage of items
Store glass products, breakables, and heavy materials on lower shelves
Attach cabinets, shelving and certain fixtures to secure structures
Toe board and handrails should be in place in all loft areas
Open only one file drawer at a time
Do not open drawers past safety stops
Use proper carrying techniques for sharp objects
Store sharp, pointed objects flat and pointed away from user
Clean/store sharp utensils individually, do not mix with other materials in a
sink or drawer
Safety devices, such as finger guards and blade locking devices should be
used on paper cutters
Understand proper use techniques for each tool being used
Use appropriate hot pads or mitts when handling hot items
Do not operate machines or equipment until instructed in proper use
Follow manufacturers recommendations for safe use of tool
All electrical equipment should be turned off and unplugged when changing
parts or when equipment is being repaired
Wear eye protection if grinding or sawing materials
Report all fires to fire and insurance officials
Know fire extinguisher location and operation
Know evacuation routes and alternatives
Know bell or alarm system at work location
Know contingency plans for various emergencies
Practice specific role in emergency plan
Store combustible materials away from heat sources
Limit wall coverage with combustible materials to less than 50%
Make sure portable heaters have tip over switches and are U.L. approved
Maintain good housekeeping practices
Do not risk your life trying to extinguish a fire, which could get out of
control
Storage of duplication/ditto fluids should be limited to two gallons, plus one
in use, at a single location
Unplug all electrical appliances (such as space heaters, coffee pots, etc.) at
the end of each work day
Only trained personnel should work on or modify electrical systems
All electrical plugs should be pushed fully into receptacle
Make sure electrical equipment is not wet or damp
Always use grounded electrical cords
Multiple outlet extenders (power strip, etc.) must have a circuit breaker
Unplug electrical equipment by pulling on the plug instead of the cord
Do not hang objects from light fixtures
Replace rather than repair electrical cords
Do not remove ground prong on the male electrical plug
Inspect electrical equipment, including cords, for defects before use
All outlets near water/liquid sources (within 6 ft.) should be Ground Fault
Circuit Interrupter (CFCI) type outlets. Report any unprotected outlets
Use non-metal ladders around electrical equipment
Health/Safety-44
Potential
Hazards
Vehicle Accidents
Post signs warning persons with pacemakers when microwave ovens are used
Miscellaneous Injuries
Stress
Infectious Diseases or
Heath Conditions
Health/Safety-45
Potential
Hazards
Toxic Substance
Illnesses
Repetitive Motion
Injuries (Cumulative
Trauma)
Never use any chemicals without knowing its hazards. Always review the
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) before using any chemical
Review and follow district written Hazard Communication program
Know location of MSDS and follow recommendations for use. (See
Appendix K)
Use non-toxic materials where possible
Read container label and follow manufacturers safe use directions.
Make sure that all primary and secondary containers are properly labeled
Do not remain in one position for long periods without moving
Change activities as often as possible
Do light exercise of muscles to loosen them and reduce tension
Make sure your position is as comfortable as possible
See that your furniture is adjusted to your particular needs
Wear special equipment if it can reduce strain (special eyeglasses, wrist
races, etc.)
Follow basic ergonomic guidelines when using a computer
Make sure your chair provides good lumbar support
Adjust your chair properly
Keep keyboard and monitor lined up directly in front of you
Keep wrists level with the keyboard
Make sure the mouse is at the same level as the keyboard
Keep elbows close to your body
Dont cradle the phone between your head and shoulder
Set up your work area to minimize reaching and awkward positioning
Place the monitor so the top of the screen is at, or slightly below, eye level
Dont rest your arms or wrists on the sharp edge of a desk or counter
Control glare on monitor to avoid eye strain
Keep feet flat on the floor or use a footrest
Use a document holder whenever possible
Health/Safety-46
Due Date:__________
Location:______________________________________________ Room #:__________________________________
Instructions: Complete this Classroom Hazard Checklist by the due date indicated and forward to the site
administrator. Site administrator reviews, signs and forwards to Business Services. Any questions should be directed to
the Director of Environmental and Health Services.
Yes
No
Unknown
Not
Applicable
Completed by____________________________________________________Date_______________
Site Administrator_________________________________________________Date_______________
Director, Environmental & Health Services_____________________________Date_______________
IIPP Training Packet August 2005
Health/Safety-47
SAFETY NOTES
These notes should apply to all classrooms, office areas, workrooms, storerooms, etc.
1.
High Storage of Heavy Items: All areas, including classrooms, should be reviewed for hazardous conditions due to
excessive, high storage of heavy items, especially when near an exit or in close proximity to student or staff. Check
spaces on top of built-in cabinets and metal cabinets. Lips or wires should be installed along the tops of all cabinets and
across the fronts of all shelving to prevent items from flying off in the event of an earthquake. Limit high storage of heavy
items.
2.
Securing of Cabinet Doors: All cabinet doors should be equipped with some type of device (other than magnets) to
prevent them from opening in an earthquake. Evidence from past earthquakes indicates that cabinet doors open and dump
their contents, many items directly in front of main exists. It is also recommended that students desk not be located
directly in front of cabinets as a preventative measure.
3.
Cubbies, Files, Cabinets, Aquariums and Other Unsecured Items near exits: All cubbies, four drawer files, metal cabinets,
bookshelves, as well as aquariums, should be located away from main exits if possible. These routinely fall over in an
earthquake and have the potential for blocking what may be the only exit from a classroom. Make sure all items are
securely fastened to a wall or other sturdy structure.
4.
Unsecured Bookshelves, Four/Five Drawer Files, Cabinet and Other Shelving, Etc.: All shelving, file drawers, bookcases,
etc. should be firmly secured to a sturdy structure in order to prevent injury during an earthquake. L brackets or other
methods should be used. Freestanding shelving could be bolted back to back in order to create a more stable base.
Configuring into a T is also an effective method. Multiple file drawers can also be bolted together for more stability.
Use the OES Guide and Checklist for Non-Structural Earthquake Hazards in CA Schools (www.dsa.dgs.ca.gov go to
publications) as a guide.
5.
Files, Cabinets, and other Hazards Located Behind Teachers or Students Desks: Four/five drawer files, cabinets and
other shelving should not be located directly behind a teachers or students desk. During an earthquake, file drawers can
topple forward or to the side and cause great injury to the teacher or student. It is best to locate files and other cabinets in
corners where they are least likely to cause an injury or block an exit. These should also be secured to a wall or other
stable structure. Unlatched drawers can roll open and cause the file drawers to fall over. Make sure drawers are securely
latched unless in use.
6.
Unsecured Trophies: Storing trophies in high locations should be avoided. If there is no other location to store or display
trophies, make sure they are secured by using a series of wires or Plexiglas retainers across the front of the shelves.
Trophies are heavy and sharp and can cause severe injuries. Never locate trophies above students desks.
7.
Securing of Computer Monitors: All computer monitors should be secured by means of a strap or other method to prevent
them from falling over in an earthquake. Many monitors are heavier in the front than in the back and will easily topple
over. It is recommended that all monitors be secured either to the computer cart or the desktop. Note: damage to property
(such as computers) or loss of your data during an earthquake is not covered by insurance. Non-slip shelf lining can be
used as a temporary measure to provide a non-skid surface under equipment, but will provide minimal protection. Using
products such as heavy-duty Velcro or other strap-type devices provide better protection.
8.
Marbles and Other Items Stored in Glass Containers in Classrooms: We have been noticing a number of classrooms that
have large jars of marbles sitting on teachers desks and on top of cabinets. These marbles can create a hazard if the jar
falls and distributes marbles throughout the classroom. Marbles are difficult to walk on when trying to evacuate a
classroom in an emergency. It is recommended that marbles be kept in plastic containers with tight fitting lids.
9.
Blocked Exits: All doors that exit to the outside of the building MUST be kept clear at all times (per fire code). Even if
the door is never used, if it exits to the outside, it must always be clear and available as an evacuation route. In addition, if
throw bolts are used on any doors in classrooms (which we do not recommend), the bolt must ALWAYS be open during
school hours. Maintain clear exits and exit routes at all times.
10. Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter Outlets (GFCI): It is recommended that all electrical outlets within 6 ft. of a water
source, such as a sink, be replaced with a GFCI outlet. These types of outlets are intended to protect humans from being
shocked. Outlets are routinely installed over or newer sinks in classrooms, so it is important to have these outlets changed
to prevent injury to staff and students.
Health/Safety-48
11. Aquariums: During an earthquake, the motion can cause the water to rock aquariums off their locations. Even very heavy
aquariums are at risk. Straps around the top edge and secured to a wall are an effective preventative measure. Attaching a
lip of molding to the counter at the base can also help. Do not position students desks close to aquariums.
12. TVs on Carts: TVs on carts should always be secured with a sturdy strap or other appropriate method.
13. Use of Extension Cords, Multiplug Adapters, Power Strips, Etc.: Extension cords are to be used ONLY as a temporary
power source and are not to be used to permanently hook up a computer, radio or other appliance. When used for an
overhead projector in a classroom, the extension cord should be unplugged and rolled up when not in immediate use.
Multiplug adapters are approved for use only if they are equipped with a breaker (light). Long cords to equipment should
be unplugged and rolled up when not in immediate use. Cords should be routed away from traffic paths. If it is not
possible to reroute a cord out of the traffic path, a tread guard could be used to prevent a tripping hazard, but is not ideal.
Do not run cords under carpets, as this will damage the cord if it is walked on.
14. Hanging Artwork or Other Materials From Light Fixtures: Artwork and other decorative materials should not be hung
from light fixtures. There are hazards associated with fire as well as electrical shock. All artwork and other types of
decorative materials could be hung from approved wires. Make sure wires are high enough so they dont pose an
additional risk.
15. Blocked Electrical Panels: Electrical panels must be kept clear at all times. A minimum of 36 clearance is required.
16. Fire Extinguishers: Fire extinguishers should be securely hung near the exit at approximately waist height. Fire
extinguisher locations should be clearly marked. They should also be checked monthly to make sure they are charged and
the plastic security loop is intact. Fire extinguishers should be recharged/serviced every year. But should be checked
regularly by staff. Recommend that all staff be trained in the proper use of a fire extinguisher. Make sure that all fire
extinguishers are properly mounted, do not have items hanging from them and are not blocked.
17. Numbering of All Rooms: All exterior doors (classrooms, offices, custodial rooms, etc.) should be labeled both inside and
outside, above the door or to the side so emergency personnel will be able to locate rooms quickly.
18. Posting of Signs Microwave in Use: It is recommended that a small sign be posted on the outside of any area using a
microwave. The purpose of this posting is to warn persons with pacemakers that a microwave is in use. The sign should
say, Microwave in Use.
19. Playground Safety: Loose fill surfacing material should be maintained at a minimum of 12. It should be raked often and
all foreign materials (rocks, glass, feces, etc.) removed. All playground equipment should comply with the CPSC
Guidelines and the ASTM Standards OR a plan should be in place to correct deficiencies within a reasonable timeline.
Equipment should be checked daily for broken or missing parts. Regular maintenance schedules should be developed for
each playground and all maintenance activities should be documented as required. Proper supervision should be provided
during regular school hours.
20. Soccer Goals: Heavy metal soccer goals should be secured in place during use. During off-season, they should be chained
to a fence to prevent being moved. Unsecured soccer goals have caused serious injuries and deaths when they have fallen
over.
21. Rubber Cement, Solvent Based White Out, Spray Adhesives and Other Hazardous Art and Crafts Materials: These
products (and many others) have been identified by the California EPA as not being appropriate for use at the K-6 level.
The list of Art and Craft Materials Which Cannot Be Purchased For Use in Kindergarten and Grades One Through Six
is available at www.oehha.ca.gov/education/art/artguide. It is recommended that all schools review this list and items
found on it in classrooms be removed from K-6 school sites immediately. This list is intended for use at the K-6 level, but
it is recommended that this list be applied to the upper grades as much as possible to protect the health and safety of all
students and staff. Products labeled as AP Non-toxic conforming to ASTM D4236 are always a better choice.
22. Cleaning Products, Bleach, Ammonia and Other Materials Stored in Classrooms: During inspections, a variety of
hazardous materials are found in classrooms. These products are often easily accessible to students. It is recommended
that all hazardous materials be kept either out of the classroom entirely or be locked in a cabinet that is not accessible to
students. All areas under sinks should be checked carefully. If the label says Keep Out of Reach of Children every
effort should be made to do so. NOTE: Bleach and ammonia (this includes powdered cleansers like Comet and liquid
glass cleaners like Windex) should never be stored or used together. When bleach and ammonia are mixed, chlorine gas is
created and could cause permanent lung damageor death.
IIPP Training Packet August 2005
Health/Safety-49
23. Lead Glazes and Lead Free Glazes: All ceramic glazes and underglazes that are labeled as containing lead or fritted
lead should be removed from school and disposed of as a hazardous waste. Even products labeled as lead safe should
not be used in the school environment. Only those products labeled Non-Toxic are considered safe for use in schools
Refer to the toxic art and crafts listing above in #20.
24. Chemical Safety: All hazardous materials used on a school site must have an MSDS on file. These should be kept in a
central location. Employees should be instructed not to bring cleaning products and other chemicals from home and to
only use approved products. All chemical labs should have an up-to-date inventory with chemicals properly separated
(not alphabetically). All employees should receive training in how to read an MSDS. All chemicals and by-products
should be disposed of properly. Employees should be instructed in proper disposal techniques. All science specimens
should be secured from falling from shelves during an earthquake and should not contain Formaldehyde. Spill kits should
be readily available.
25. Combustible Fuel Load in Classrooms: The amount of paper coverage, such as decorations and student work, in
classrooms should be limited to no more than 50% of the total wall space. Adding layers of paper, as in bulletin boards
displaying artwork, increases the fire risk. Use fire resistant materials whenever possible. Keep classrooms clear of
unnecessary clutter and debris as much as possible. Christmas trees must be treated with fire retardant.
26. Clear Hallways: Hallways, breezeways and other evacuation routes should not be used to store excess furniture and other
items.
27. In-Wall Lunch Tables: In-wall lunch tables should be raised and lowered carefully to prevent injury to staff. When
returning the tables or benches to their in-wall positions, special attention should be given to ensuring that the pins are
engaged and security toggles activated. Improper storage of these units has resulted in failure of the securing hardware
causing the table or bench to fall out of position and severely injuring and even killing students.
Please call RESIG at (707) 836-0779 x107 or email at: jgoobanoff@resig.org if you have any questions.
Health/Safety-50
Resources
(Add your own)
1. Nutrition
a. www.webdiatician.com
b. www.dairycouncilofca.org
c.
2. Adolescent Health Issues
a. www.ahwg.net (Adolescent Health Working Group)
b.
3. Child Abuse
a. www.safestate.org
b. www.nsvrc.org
c.
4. Medical Conditions and Injuries
a. www.diabetes.org (American Diabetes Association)
b. www.nhlbi.nih.gov (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute)
c. www.dhpe.org (Department of Health Promotion in Education)
d. www.redcross.org
e.
5. Mental Health
a. www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov (National Mental Health Information Center)
b.
6. Legislation
a. California Education Code: www.leginfo.ca.gov
b.
7. Suicide Prevention
a. National Committee on Youth Suicide Prevention
666 5th Avenue, 13th Floor
New York, NY 10103
(212) 957-9292
b.
8. Health Education
a. Health Framework for California Public Schools
California Department of Public Education
CDE Press, Sales Office
P.O. Box 271
Sacramento, CA 95812-0271; FAX (916) 323-0823
http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/pn/rc
b.
9.
Special thanks to Steve Jurist for his vision, expertise, and hard work in researching and developing
this resource guide. His dedication and support of new teachers is truly appreciated!
Health/Safety-51
REFERENCES
For General Safety information:
US Department of Labor
OSHA Publications
PO Box 37535
395 Oyster Point Blvd.
Washington, D.C. 20013-753
(202) 693-1888
www.osha.gov/pls/publications
State of California
Department of Health Services
1501 Capitol Ave., Suite 2101
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 445-4171
www.dhcs.ca.gov
Health/Safety-52
Notes
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
Extending
st
st
Page 1 of 1
Special Populations
Resource Guide
Name
Phone number
email address
________________________
Superintendent
__________________
__________________
________________________
Special Ed Director
__________________
__________________
________________________
Special Ed Secretary
__________________
__________________
________________________
Principal
__________________
__________________
________________________
Principals Secretary
__________________
__________________
________________________
School Psychologist
__________________
__________________
________________________
Speech and Language Specialist
__________________
__________________
________________________
Special Education Teacher
__________________
__________________
________________________
Special Education Teacher
__________________
__________________
________________________
Special Education Teacher
__________________
__________________
________________________
Occupational Therapist
__________________
__________________
________________________
Behaviorist
__________________
__________________
________________________
SELPA Director
__________________
__________________
Table of Contents
Page #
I.
II.
III.
15
16
17-18
VI.
10
11
12-13
14
V.
6
7
8-9
Referral Process
a.
b.
c.
d.
IV.
1
2
3
4
5
19
20
21-26
27-30
31
32-33
34
35
36
37-38
Resources
a. Websites
39
This resource guide provides teachers with information about issues that are
encountered when working with students who learn differently. Information is
gathered from Title 5, which is the umbrella law that guides all processes and
procedures regarding Special Education. While this resource guide gives you
general information about a variety of issues related to Special Education and
students who learn differently, it is important for you to take time to read any
district specific policies and procedures for serving students with special needs. The
information and materials contained in this resource guide represent a small
selection from the vast array of materials available that can assist teachers in
supporting students with special needs.
Special thanks and acknowledgment to those who assisted in the writing and editing of
this resource guide.
INTRODUCTION
ADHD
AE
APE
CAC
CH
Communicatively Handicapped
COE
ED
Emotionally Disturbed
ESY
FI
Full Inclusion
FSIQ
IDEA 04
IEP
ITP
IQ
Intelligence Quotient
LD
Learning Disabled
LH
Learning Handicapped
LRE
MA
Mental Age
NPS
Non-Public School
OT
Occupational Therapist
RSP
SDC
SELPA
SH
Severely Handicapped
SLD
SST
WISC-IV
Special Populations-2
Six Principles
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) - 2004
Special Populations-3
Response to Intervention (RtI) is a general education strategy intended to provide students with
early systemic, strategic, research-based remedial intervention.
In an RtI model, students performing below grade level are given remedial interventions tailored to
their specific needs, while continuing to participate in the general education core curriculum.
These targeted remedial interventions are determined through academic screenings and progress
monitored by both general and special education staffs.
Students who do not show sufficient growth over time, after having been given interventions
targeted at their specific needs, may then be determined to need special education since they have
not shown a response to interventions.
Ensuring that students have been provided an opportunity to have sufficient and specific
interventions before they are placed in special education should prevent inappropriate special
education placements. IDEA 2004 allows states to use RtI in lieu of the learning disability
discrepancy model currently used by many states.
The three-tier Response to Intervention (RtI) model (see following page) is the model
most commonly used across the United States. Under the three-tier system students
have access and opportunity to participate in all three of the following (as appropriate):
1.) The core curriculum that all students are taught
2.) A supplemental remedial curriculum that is provided in addition to - rather
than instead of - the core curriculum
3.) Intensive instruction that is systematic and explicit.
Only after a student has failed to show adequate response to the three tiers would he or she be
considered for special education. Intervention at each tier should last at least 6 weeks. Frequent
progress monitoring during the intervention period indicates whether the child is succeeding; if s/he
is not, instruction should be modified to see whether a different intervention would be successful.
Under an RtI model, special education teachers work collaboratively with general education staff
in helping to provide targeted interventions, before students are actually placed in special education.
Special education paperwork should be considerably reduced, as should the number of students
labeled as learning disabled.
Special Populations-4
Special Populations-5
Universal Interventions
All students
Preventive, proactive
75-85%
Academic Systems
10-15%
10-15%
5-10%
75-85%
Universal Interventions
All settings, all students
Preventive, proactive
Response to Intervention on the Ground: Diagnosing the Learning Enabled, W. David Tilly III
5-10%
Behavioral Systems
WHO?
IDEA 2004 mandates that there must be a General Education teacher present, if the
student is in, or is going to be in, general education classes. Others who are mandated
to attend include: a parent, a special education teacher, an administrator or designee, a
person to interpret any assessment data, and, as appropriate, the student whose
Ed. Code 56341.(b)(2)
program is being discussed.
To determine what supports, supplementary aides and services both you and the
student will need to be successful in the general education class. The IEP must indicate
what specific accommodations, modifications and supports are available to you in
assisting that student, in addition to your responsibilities.
Ed. Code 56345(a)(b)(3) 56100(a)(I)(j) 56381 (1)(d)
Autistic
Deaf
Deaf -Blind
Emotionally Disturbed
Orthopedically Impaired
Mentally Retarded
Multiple Disabilities
Hard of Hearing
Home Instruction
Out of State Schools
S tate School
N on Public Schools
County SDC p rogram s
Dist Special Day Class
R S P & R elated Services
OTPT APE
Counseling Parent
Education etc
R esource Specialist
P rogram
RS P
D esignated
Instructional Services
G eneral Education
Special Populations-7
Autism
A student exhibits any combination of the following autistic-like behaviors, to include but not
limited to: an inability to use oral language for appropriate communication; a history of extreme
withdrawal or relating to people inappropriately and continued impairment in social interaction
from infancy through early childhood; an obsession to maintain sameness; extreme preoccupation
with objects or inappropriate use of objects or both; extreme resistance to controls; displays
peculiar motoric mannerisms and motility patterns; self-stimulating ritualistic behavior.
Deaf
A student has a hearing impairment, whether permanent or fluctuating, which impairs the
processing of linguistic information through hearing, even with amplification, and which
adversely affects educational performance. Processing linguistic information includes speed and
language reception and speech and language discrimination.
Deaf-Blindness
A student has simultaneous hearing and visual impairments, the combination of which causes
severe communication, developmental, and education problems.
Emotional Disability
A student exhibits one or more of the following characteristics over a long period of time and to a
marked degree, which adversely affect educational performance. Characteristics include: an
inability to learn that cannot be explained by intellectual, sensory or health factors; an inability to
build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal relationships with peers and teachers; inappropriate
types of behavior or feelings under normal circumstances exhibited in several situations; a
tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated with personal or school problems.
Hearing Impaired
A student has a hearing impairment, whether permanent or fluctuating, which impairs the
processing of linguistic information through hearing, even with amplification, which adversely
affects educational performance. Processing linguistic information includes speech and language
reception and speech and language discrimination.
Mental Retardation
A student has significantly below average general intellectual functioning existing concurrently
with deficits in adaptive behavior and manifested during the developmental period, which
adversely affects a students educational performance.
Multiple Disabilities
A student has simultaneous impairments, the combination of which, cause such severe
educational problems that they cannot be accommodated in special education programs solely for
one of the impairments. The term does not include deaf-blindness.
Special Populations-8
Orthopedic Impairment
A student has a severe orthopedic impairment which adversely affects the students educational
performance. Such orthopedic impairments include impairments caused by congenital anomaly,
impairments caused by disease, and impairments for other causes.
Other Health Impairment
A student has limited strength, vitality, or alertness, due to chronic or acute health problems
which adversely affect his or her educational performance. IDEA 97 clarifies that the term
limited strength, vitality, or alertness: when applied to children with AD/HD includes a childs
heightened alertness to environmental stimuli that results in limited alertness with respect to the
educational environment. This health problem is not temporary in nature as defined by Section
3001 (v) of the education code.
Specific Learning Disability
A student has a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in
understanding or in using language, spoken or written, which may manifest itself in an impaired
ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or do mathematical calculations, and has a severe
discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement in one or more of the academic areas
specified in Section 56337 (a) of the Education Code.
Language or Speech Disorder
A student shall be assessed, by a Language, Speech and Hearing Specialist, as having a language
or speech disorder which makes him or her eligible for special education and related services
when he or she demonstrates difficulty understanding or using spoken language to such an extent
that it adversely affects his or her educational performance and cannot be corrected without
special education and related services. Disorders in this category include language, articulation,
voice and fluency.
Traumatic Brain Injury
A student has acquired injury to the brain caused by an external physical force resulting in a total
or partial functional disability or psychological impairment, or both, that adversely affects
educational performance. The term applies to open or closed head injuries resulting in
impairments in one or more areas, such as language, cognition, memory; attention reasoning;
abstract thinking; judgment; problem solving; sensory, perceptual and motor abilities;
psychosocial behavior; physical functions; information processing and speech. The term does not
apply to brain injuries that are congenital or degenerative, or brain injuries caused by birth
trauma.
Visual Impairment
A student has a visual impairment that, even with correction, adversely affects the students
education performance.
Special Populations-9
Special Populations-10
STEP ONE:
The process to begin an evaluation of a possible Section 504 student is a Student Study Team meeting (see
page 15). PLEASE REFER TO YOUR DISTRICT PROCESS FOR INITIATING A STUDENT STUDY
TEAM MEETING.
STEP TWO:
At the Student Study Team meeting, the supporting documents (private psychological reports, a doctors
written diagnosis etc.) are presented. The focus of the meeting is to discuss the adverse effects of the
students condition (as has been determined and documented in the presenting report) relative to his/her
ability to learn.
What are the preliminary eligibility questions to ask?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Does this child have an active IEP? If so, then STOP. A child with an active IEP is already
covered under special education law, which is broader and more encompassing than Section 504.
Does the child have a valid, documented and undisputed mental or physical condition (e.g.
contagious disease, cosmetic disfigurement, anatomical loss, etc.)?
Does this students mental or physical limitations substantially restrict the students ability to
learn? (e.g. SAT 9 scores below 15%tile, grades of Ds and Fs, consistently not passing or at-risk
of not passing, etc.)
Important note: Poor school achievement cannot be due to refusals, low motivation, cultural and
language issues, environmental factors, transitory crisis and/or a behavior disorder.
STEP THREE
The outcome of this meeting is to:
a)
b)
*Definition of a major life activity (Pub.L,No.110-325, 122 Stat. 3553 20 U.S.C): Major life activities include, but are not
limited to: caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing,
lifting, speaking, reading, learning, concentrating, thinking, communicating and working.
Special Populations-11
STEP TWO:
Once the Assessment Plan is signed for permission to assess, the student must be assessed and an Individualized
Educational Plan (IEP) meeting must be held within 60 calendar days of the districts receipt of the signed
assessment plan. Extension of timeline is allowed in the initial IEP dates only, if parent agrees.
STEP THREE:
An IEP meeting is held, in which the parents are invited to attend. They can bring anyone they want to the meeting.
If they want to bring an attorney, they must notify the district in advance, such that the district can have equal
representation. Also in attendance at the meeting must be an LEA representative/administrator, the classroom
teacher, the special educator and the assessors. The student may attend.
STEP FOUR:
At the meeting, there is a review of the assessment, of in-class performance and a determination of eligibility. There
are 14 different qualifying conditions (please refer to page 4 of this handbook). Specific criteria must be met for each
handicapping condition. In each case, the IEP team must determine that the students handicap adversely affects
his/her education performance.
In determining the adverse affect of the qualifying condition on educational performance, the following guidelines
are considered:
1. Discrepancy between the students ability as measured on the intellectual assessment and the academic
performance. Although IDEA 04 removed discrepancy as a requirement for eligibility with a specific
learning disability, this model continues to be used.
2. Work samples, criterion reference tests, task completion, on task behavior, group participation, peer and
teacher interaction, behavior rating scales and teacher observations may also be used to determine adverse
effect.
3. Lack of attendance cannot be the sole basis of adverse effect.
4. Documentation that the students skills are markedly below the instructional range of the classroom.
5. Second language, cultural or environmental issues cannot be the sole basis of adverse effect.
6. Overall pattern of poor grades, substantiated in the cumulative records.
7. The student scores two or more grade levels below actual placement on individually or group
administered standardized achievement tests.
Special Populations-12
STEP FIVE:
Once eligibility is established, goals are developed by the team in areas of determined need. These may include
academic, behavioral or social-emotional needs. There are two types of goals: enabling the student to be
involved/progress in the general curriculum using state standards; and, if appropriate, addressing other educational
needs resulting from the disability. The goals and objectives are aligned to the state standards, and are written in
measurable standards including methods of data collection. Objectives need to be written for students who will be
taking alternate state testing and reported to parents/guardians at the same regularly scheduled reporting periods for
all students. Alternative state tests are the California Alternative Performance Assessment (CAPA) and the California
Modified Assessment (CMA).
STEP SIX:
The IEP team determines if there are any other types of services or support that the student might need to meet the
goals, or if there are any types of support that the general education teacher might need to assist the student in
meeting the goals and objectives (e.g. technology support, modified texts, etc.).
STEP SEVEN:
The IEP team determines what is the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE see p. 5 of this document) in which the
student can meet the goals. It is the intent of the IEP to always look at maintaining the student in an educational
environment where s/he can be with general education peers for as much of their day as possible. Consideration can
be given to the following placement options. These are listed in order from the least restrictive to the most restrictive:
General Education Class
Designated Instruction (which may included Speech and Language, Counseling, etc)
Resource Specialist Program or a Learning Center Model
Special Day Class (either at the home school, local school or the County Office)
Nonpublic School
Residential Placement (either within California, or outside California)
Home Placement (considered most restrictive, because there is no interaction with non-disabled or
disabled peers.
STEP EIGHT:
The IEP is a CONSENSUS DOCUMENT, which means that only with agreement of the parties can the IEP be
implemented. All participants in the IEP sign under IEP Participants. Parents must also sign under Consent,
indicating if they are in full agreement, partial agreement, or not in agreement. Those areas of the IEP that the parent
is in agreement with may be implemented upon the parents signature. The next IEP meeting date is held within one
year of the date of the current IEP meeting. The IEP can only be implemented with the written permission of the
parents. If there is disagreement, there are optional processes to facilitate agreement between the parents and the
School District, which include: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Mediation and/or Due Process. Students are
reassessed every three years or at major transitions.
Special Populations-13
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT
INDIVIDUAL EDUCATION
PLAN (IEP) IMPLEMENTED
NO FURTHER CONCERNS
504 QUALIFICATIONS
Does the student have a documented
Special Populations-14
While the Student Study Team (SST) procedure for referral and review of student needs is personalized in
each district, there are legal guidelines that determine steps through the referral process for special education
services. (Ed. Code 56303) Typically, each district will have an adopted policy relative to the Student Study
Team. The following step-by-step procedure is a suggested format, which should be replaced with the one
that is being used at your school.
STEP ONE:
When any student is having difficulties - emotional, academic or behavioral - the teacher should attempt a
range of intervention strategies. These interventions need to be documented. Contact should be made with
the parent to alert them of the issues of concern.
STEP TWO:
If there is insufficient progress, the teacher completes a Referral Form, which is turned into the principal.
The principal may meet with the referring teacher to decide on a course of action, which may include a
referral to a Student Study Team. The Student Study Team (SST) is a general education process that is
staffed by a group of site-based personnel (teachers, administrator, etc.) who will brainstorm with the
referring teacher on issues related to the student of concern. If there is a decision to hold an SST the teacher
contacts the parent to alert them. Any necessary paperwork is completed by both the referring teacher and
the parent prior to the meeting.
STEP THREE:
The SST meeting is held. After reviewing the strengths and concerns related to the child, the team makes a
series of recommendations and an action plan. A time frame is established within which time the action
plan is implemented. A follow-up date is scheduled, generally within 6 - 8 weeks.
STEP FOUR:
The SST reconvenes to determine the effectiveness of the documented interventions. If the interventions
have been successful, the process stops and all completed paperwork is placed in the students folder. If the
interventions have been unsuccessful or have revealed other areas of concern, the student may be referred
for another set of actions, which may include a referral to a specialist for a more in-depth review of needs or
a referral for a more in-depth assessment (e.g. Special Education team, Counselor, Speech/ Language
Specialist, School Psychologist).
STEP FIVE:
In the event that the student has been further referred for any type of assessment, the appropriate and legal
papers must be signed by parents/guardians in accordance with school/district policy and procedure before
the next step can be taken. Parents must be kept informed throughout this process.
Special Populations-15
STEP ONE:
Once a student has been referred for an assessment for consideration as a Special Needs student, there is
an Assessment Plan that is developed in accordance with what has been recommended by the results of
the Student Study Team. The students name is recorded, and the timeline for completion of the
assessment is started. The Assessment Plan and Parent Rights are sent home for parental signature.
(Note: Some districts do not utilize the SST. When an SST is in place, the district SST process can not be used to
slow down the mandated 15 day response time for testing.)
STEP TWO:
Upon receipt of the signed plan, the individual specialists who are noted on the Assessment Plan are
alerted. The assessment, and Individualized Educational Program Planning (IEP) meeting must be
completed within 60 days.
STEP THREE:
When all the assessments have been completed,
arrangements are made with the parents to hold an IEP
meeting within the original 60-day timeline.
STEP FOUR:
The reports are written, and the IEP meeting is held, in which the parent, general education teacher, a
special education teacher, an LEA representative (e.g. administrator or administrator designee) and the
assessors MUST be in attendance. The examiners review the results of their assessments, and a decision
is made regarding eligibility under Title 5. If the student is not eligible under Special Education (IDEA),
the team may consider eligibility under Section 504, if appropriate, and refer to the team, accordingly. If
the student is eligible under IDEA, the team develops goals, objectives and determines the necessary
supports.
STEP FIVE:
Once the goals are developed and appropriate services are determined, it is the responsibility of the IEP
team to discuss all options for a student, keeping in mind that s/he should be placed in the Least
Restrictive Environment (please refer to the LRE Pyramid on page 5).
STEP SIX:
The team members sign for participation in the IEP. A review date is determined to be held within a year
of implementation. The parents signature gives permission to implement the Special Education Program.
The parents, the classroom teacher and special education teacher receive a copy of the IEP.
Special Populations-16
TYPES OF ASSESSMENTS
Standard Psycho-Educational Battery
OBSERVATIONS
There is a need to see the student in his/her
educational environment. Do the concerns related to the
referral manifest themselves in an obvious manner?
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
There is a need to determine patterns of behaviors as
they relate to the presenting areas of concern.
Possible tests to use:
Health and Developmental
Parent Interview
PSYCHOMOTOR FUNCTIONING
This gives the assessor an idea of visual organization, the capacity to follow directions, pencil grip,
spatial orientation, the speed/length of time it takes to perform a writing task, the ability to copy things
from the board. Some of the skills related to these assessments are linked to a students ability to
draw, perform art based tasks, write, copy, self organize, and orient him/herself visually.
Possible tests to use:
Bender Gestalt (also measures visual organization) up to age 12
VMI (Beery Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration) ages 3-18
PROCESSING/MEMORY FUNCTIONING
These are essential assessments to determine any potential areas of concern related to confirming
processing disorder. These are the assessments that lead to discussions of Auditory Processing,
memory deficits, attention deficits, and/or visual perception difficulties.
Possible tests to use:
Test of Auditory Perceptual Skills-Revised (TAPS)
Test of Visual Perception Skills (non-motor) - revised
Motor Free Visual Perception Test-R
WRAML (Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning)
Learning Efficiency Test-II
INTELLECTUAL/COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING
The intellectual assessment is generally the cornerstone of any
assessment. The test, given in isolation without distractions, assesses a
students potential for academic success. Generally the assessment will
give information related to both verbal (using language) and nonverbal
(not using language, but giving demonstration) skills. Many of the
subtests are timed and all have specific norms and conditions that must
be adhered to. It should also be noted that most of these assessments are not given on a regular (annual
) basis, due to the test/re-test issues. Further, it should be noted that there are different assessment
tools used for different types of students (issues of concern). These assessments generally give
information related to processing information, attention, visual and verbal reasoning, social awareness
skills, working memory, vocabulary, focus, and perceptual organizational skills. While there are some
limitations (e.g. younger children generally test higher, students with second language issues test
lower on Verbal, children with high levels of distractibility may test lower than anticipated), the
assessment generally gives a snapshot of student capacity. AVERAGE standard scores fall within the
range of 85 - 115.
Possible tests to use:
Weschler Tests (WPPSI, WISC-IV, WASI, WAIS-III)
Woodcock Johnson - III
CAS (Cognitive Assessment System)
ACADEMIC FUNCTIONING
Given that this is a Psycho-educational assessment, the focus is on how the student is doing
academically. These tests will give an estimate of how the student performs in optimum conditions on
standardized assessment. The results of this information is balanced against the intellectual
assessment.
Possible tests to use:
Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement (WJ-III)
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test - III (WIAT)
Special Populations-18
Is off task
Is fidgety
Daydreams
Blurts out responses
Inability to inhibit responses
Unconscious tapping
Attention to external noises
Poor nutrition
Change in routine
Separation or Divorce
Mood Disorders
Depression
Work level is too easy
An Attention Deficit Disorder may exist with or without hyperactivity. The majority of
those identified with the hyperactive type are boys. Girls tend to be under identified and
usually exhibit the inattentive type.
While there is no simple test to determine AD(H)D, some of the tools that are used are:
observations, behavior rating scales, work samples, or developmental history.
In the event that you suspect that a student has an Attention Deficit Disorder, it is
recommended that you contact the parent, and/or follow your Districts steps to request a
Student Study Team meeting.
Special Populations-19
EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE
According to the State of California Code of Regulations, and local
educational guidelines, in order to qualify for special education services under
the category of Emotionally Disturbed, a student must meet specific criteria.
The student must meet one or more of the following FIVE conditions.
1.
2.
3.
4.
A tendency to develop physical symptoms or fear that are associated with personal or
school problem. For example, this might be demonstrated by a students complaints of
stomach or headaches, unreasonable phobias or school avoidance. It is important to rule out
any issues of terminal or significant illness, violence in the home or possible parental
separation or divorce issues.
5.
2.
3.
The behaviors have been evident for an extended period of time (more than six months).
Important: In conducting the assessment, it is important to rule out the presence of a conduct disorder,
or social maladjustment. This means willful behavior in a student who knows better or who is seeking
negative attention.
Special Populations-20
From:
Learning Disabilities Association of America
4156 Library Road
Pittsburgh, PA 15234-1349
Phone (412) 341-1515 Fax (412) 344-0224
INPUT
Information is primarily brought into the brain through the eyes (visual perception) and ears
(auditory perception). An individual might have difficulty in one or both areas.
Auditory Perception. (Also called Receptive Language) The individual might have difficulty
distinguishing subtle differences in sound (called phonemes) or might have difficulty
distinguishing individual phonemes as quickly as normal. Either problem can result in difficulty
processing and understanding what is said. Individuals might have difficulty with what is called
auditory figure-ground. They have difficulty identifying what sound(s) to listen to when there is
more than one sound.
Visual Perception. One might have difficulty distinguishing subtle differences in shapes (called
graphemes). They might rotate or reverse letters or numbers (d, b, p, q, 6, 9); thus misreading the
symbol. Some might have a figure-ground problem, confusing what figure(s) to focus on from
the page covered with many words and lines. They might skip words, skip lines, or read the same
line twice. Others might have difficulty blending information from both eyes to have depth
perception. They might misjudge depth or distance, bumping into things or having difficulty with
tasks where this information is needed to tell the hands or body what to do. If there is difficulty
with visual perception, there could be problems with tasks that require eye-hand coordination
(visual motor skills) such as catching a ball, doing a puzzle, or picking up a glass.
Special Populations-22
INTEGRATION
Once information is recorded in the brain (input), three tasks must be carried out in order to make
sense or integrate this information. First, the information must be placed in the right order or
sequenced. Then, the information must be understood beyond the literal meaning, abstraction.
Finally, each unit of information must be integrated into complete thoughts or concepts,
organization.
Sequencing. The individual might have difficulty learning information in the proper sequence.
Thus, he might get math sequences wrong, have difficulty remembering sequences such as the
months of the year, the alphabet, or the times table. Or, she might write a report with all of the
important facts but not in the proper order.
Abstraction. A person might have difficulty inferring the meaning of individual words or
concepts. Jokes, idioms, or puns are often not understood. He might have problems with words
that might have different meanings depending on how they are used. For example, the dog
refers to a pet. You dog is an insult.
Organization. An individual might have difficulty organizing materials, losing, forgetting, or
misplacing papers, notebooks, or homework assignments. She might have difficulty organizing
her environment, such as her bedroom. Some might have problems organizing time. They have
difficulty with projects due at a certain time or with being on time. (Organization over time is
referred to as Executive Function.)
MEMORY
Three types of memory are important to learning. Working memory refers to the ability to hold
on to pieces of information until the pieces blend into a full thought or concept. For example,
reading each word until the end of a sentence or paragraph and then understanding the full
content. Short-term memory is the active process of storing and retaining information for a
limited period of time. The information is temporarily available but not yet stored for long-term
retention. Long-term memory refers to information that has been stored and that is available
Special Populations-23
over a long period of time. Individuals might have difficulty with auditory memory or visual
memory.
OUTPUT
From:
Learning Disabilities Association of America
4156 Library Road
Pittsburgh, PA 15234-1349
Phone (412) 341-1515 Fax (412) 344-0224
1. For some students who read slowly or with difficulty, a read-along technique in which taped
texts and materials allow learning of printed materials.
2. For students with memory problems or difficulty taking notes, a fellow student might share notes;
the student might tape the lesson; or the teacher might provide a copy of the lesson outline.
3. For students who read below expected levels, educational videos and films or talking books can
provide the general information that cannot be acquired from the printed page.
4. For students with short term memory problems (e.g., understand math processes, but have short
term memory problems that interfere with remembering math facts), a table of facts or a calculator
could be provided.
5. For the student whose handwriting is slow, illegible or includes many reversed letters, a cassette
recorder or a computer with word processing software could be used for written work or tests.
6. For the student who has difficulty with spelling, a misspellers dictionary or computerized spell
checker can help make written materials readable.
7. For students who have difficulty reading cursive, small, or crowded print, typed handouts, large
print, or double spaced materials can help.
Special Populations-25
8. To develop memory and listening skills, poetry, rhymes, songs, audio-taped materials and
mnemonics may improve performance.
9. To teach spelling, use a multi-sensory approach which combines saying, spelling aloud, and
writing words.
10. Ways to improve vocabulary and comprehension can include a student-developed file of
vocabulary words and the use of word webs and visual organizers to relate words and ideas heard
or read on paper. A dictionary or thesaurus, suited to the childs learning level, is also an
excellent tool for building vocabulary, spelling and reading comprehension.
11. For students who have difficulty organizing time, materials and information, a variety of
approaches can be used, including:
* a quiet, uncluttered homework space;
* alarm watch;
* purchased texts that can be marked with a highlighter;
* a homework assignment diary coordinated between home and school;
* study skills instruction; and
* a personally-developed date-book or scheduler.
12. For students who copy inaccurately, but need written practice to solidify learning, changes that
may help include: leaving a space directly under each word, phrase or sentence, or having
handouts on the desk for those who cant copy from the blackboard or take dictation accurately.
For left-handed students, place the list of words at the right margin. For students whose writing is
large, provide enlarged spaces for fill in the blank activities.
13. For students who seem to process auditory information slowly (e.g., not fully understanding
questions asked, recalling needed information, or forming an appropriate answer), be patient.
Allow sufficient wait-time for the answer or provide the questions in written form.
14. Oral and written language should be taught together as much as possible. Illustrations in a book
being read should be used to generate conversation, vocabulary and concepts that will relate to
what is to be read. Material that is read can be translated into a verbal summary, a word web, a
visual organizer, or a computer presentation.
15. For students who find reading slow and difficult, supplement the subject matter being read with
video tapes, DVDs, captioned TV programs, or computer software.
From:
Learning Disabilities Association of America
4156 Library Road
Pittsburgh, PA 15234-1349
Phone (412) 341-1515 Fax (412) 344-0224
Characteristics of Autism
Autism is a developmental disorder that is behaviorally defined. It is one of
the five sub-categories of the pervasive developmental disorders as defined by the DSMIV. Other sub-categories include: Pervasive Developmental Disorder, not otherwise
specified (PDD-NOS), Asperger Disorder, Rett Disorder, and Childhood Disintegrative
Disorder. Although they range in severity and symptomatology, all of these disorders
cause impairments in three categories: social, communication, and behavior. Below is a
list of characteristics associated with autism.
Age of Onset/Development
Social Domain
Impairments in:
Special Populations-27
Communications Domain
Impairments in:
Social chat
Reciprocal conversation
Appropriateness of language
o Grammar/pronominal
confusion
o Use of neologisms (the
practice of creating new
words or phrases)
o Idiosyncratic language
o Demonstration of
verbal rituals
Behavioral Characteristics
Individuals with autism can have:
Circumscribed interests
Unusual preoccupations
Repetitive use of objects
Compulsions/rituals
Unusual sensory interests
Hand/finger mannerisms
Other complex mannerisms, such as
self-stimulatory behavior
Self-injury
Special skills
Individuals with autism can vary widely from one another. Although they may exhibit
different characteristics among those outlined above, all individuals with autism have
underlying similarities of impairment in communication, socialization, and in interest and
behaviors. The severity of autism can range from very mild to quite severely impaired.
This can be confusing to may parents and professionals trying to understand the disorder
of autism. However, parents and professionals need to remember that all individuals with
autism can progress and learn when their programming is designed around their unique,
specific needs.
Special Populations-28
Teach social skills daily with direct and incidental teaching techniques. Curricula
available include the Walker Social Skills Curriculum by Pro-Ed and
Skillstreaming, by Research Press (these techniques can be done individually or in
groups)
Make the curricula have an underlying social skills philosophy
Supervise structured social interactions
Implement peer tutor programs
Respect personal space
Provide space to cool down when necessary
Build in time for teachers to observe the child
Plan for desensitization to fears
Reinforce positive social interactions
Recognize that the child may want to interact but doesnt know how
Provide specific social rules
Help the student to change topics when necessary
Use rehearsal strategies for social situations
Use other children as peer models in anyway possible
Seat students in small groups
Pedantic speech
Inability to make friends
Tend to be reclusive
Emotional vulnerability
Academic difficulties
Motor clumsiness
Poor coping strategies
Poor concentration
Low frustration tolerance
Restricted range of interests
Because these children have so many strengths, it is often easy to overlook their weaknesses.
Some of their behaviors may be interpreted as spoiled or manipulative, and children with
Aspergers are often considered defiant and troublemakers. It is important for teachers to
recognize that inappropriate behaviors are usually a function of poor coping strategies, low
frustration tolerance, and difficulty reading social cues. Most teaching strategies that are effective
for students with autism (structure, consistency etc.) also work for students with Aspergers.
However, because these children are often aware that they are different and can be self-conscious
about it, teachers may need to be subtler in their intervention method.
Special Populations-31
Identifying Antecedents
Identifying antecedent conditions will allow staff to create an individualized
program that will consider all the factors, including what to avoid, and what
to emphasize.
It is important to note that there are antecedents that are not observable, i.e.,
events that occur outside of the classroom or internal struggles.
Some possible antecedent conditions that may contribute to challenging
behaviors are:
Noise level
Tone of voice
Hunger/thirst
Denial of a request
Missed medication
Peer provocation
Physical proximity
Difficult tasks
Instructional methods
Transition times
Unstructured time
Special Populations-35
1. Size
2. Time
3. Level Of Support
4. Input
5. Difficulty
7. Participation
6. Output
Adapt how the student can
respond to instruction.
8. Alternate Goals
9. Substitute Curriculum
Adapted by Diana Browning Wright (2005) from: Adapting Curriculum and Instruction in Inclusive Classrooms: A
Teacher's Desk Reference, by Deschenes, C., Ebeling, D., and Sprague, J., 1994.
Special Populations-36
Instructional Techniques
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
Use computer
Use diagnostic materials
Give consistent instructions
Give short quizzes; not long tests
Provide frequent feedback
Provide modeling
Teach study skills
Allow open book/take home test
Other:____________________________
Testing Adaptations
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
Give orally
Tape record
Provide pictures
Read test to student
Preview/modify language of test questions
Connect to real situations
Shorten length of time
Modify format
Allow extra time
Provide concrete examples
Special Populations-37
_______
Use calendars
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
Other:_____________________________
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
Use calculator
Teacher provides notes
Teach to students learning style
(linguistic, spatial, interpersonal,
logical/math, bodily/kinesthetic, musical,
intrapersonal, experiential)
Use individualized instruction
Reduce degree of difficulty of task
Provide additional practice
Break task into small steps
Use small group instruction
Use more concrete materials
Utilize manipulatives
Use high interest activity/reading
materials
Increase difficulty of task
Other:_______________________
_______
_______
_______
_______
Instructional Materials
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
_______
Functional application
Use computer
_______
_______
Special Populations-38
WEB RESOURCES
www.cde.ca.gov/sp/se
www.scoe.org
www.nichcy.org
www.ldaca.org
www.cec.sped.org
www.rti4success.org
www.ldonline.org
www.ldanatl.org
www.schwablearning.org
www.chadd.org
www.cagifted.org
Also ask about and access the following resources at your school site, district or BTSA office:
Pre-Referral Intervention Manual, McCarney & Wunderlich, Hawthorne Educational Services, 2006
Behavior Intervention Manual Goals, Objectives and Intervention Strategies, Edited by S. House, Hawthorne
Educational Services, 2002
Both volumes are excellent resources containing a wide range of effective classroom strategies & interventions.
Special Populations-39
Notes
Clear Education Specialist candidates in non-traditional educational settings consider the areas of need as identified in
the Individual Transition Plan or the Individual Family Service Plan.
Participating Teacher:
Support Provider:
Content Area:
Beginning Date:
Grade/Period:
Ending Date:
COMMON CORE AND OR CONTENT STANDARDS
What Common Core State Standards and/or Content Standards will be addressed in this lesson series?
(This may be addressed through Assessment Claims, Target-Standards Bundle language, SBAC)
What are the ELD Standards that are integrated into this lesson series?
Describe some of the ways (e.g., teacher tools, self-assessment, peer assessment, etc.) you will elicit evidence throughout
the lesson series. Include where and how you will take opportunities to interpret evidence and act on evidence in order to
adjust instruction.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING
Describe the summative assessment that will be used to measure the skills necessary for mastery of the standard(s).
Select the item type(s) that will be used to assess student learning:
Selected Response
Constructed Response
Performance Task
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
Developing essential questions helps students transfer knowledge and learning within disciplines. Essential questions should
be:
Timeless or important
Universal in nature
Elemental or foundation inquiries within a discipline
Vital or necessary to personal understanding
Develop an essential question(s) that will guide the focus of your unit.
Copyright Commission on Teacher Credentialing and the California Department of Education
Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) 2014
Inquiry into Teaching and Learning Essential Components for Instruction
Page 1 of 2
How will other subjects or subject matter be integrated in this lesson series?
TECHNOLOGY
During this lesson series, how will students interact with technology to enhance and/or publish their understanding of the
content?
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
What materials will you consider for this lesson series?
How will you incorporate your Action Research (IIP) into this lesson series?
In what ways might the learning goals be communicated to the students and families?
How might you collaborate with resource specialists, paraeducators, and other personnel?
Based on structures for supporting English language acquisition, how might you support English learners?
Page 2 of 2
Clear Education Specialist candidates select focus students based on their caseload.
In the boxes below, record first (last initial, if necessary) names of selected students.
Below Grade Level or IEP Expectancies
Include
Minimal
Understanding
Partial Understanding
Focus Student 1:
English Learner
Alternate
Focus Student 2:
Special Populations
Alternate
Focus Student 3:
Choice
Alternate
Describe instructional or behavioral considerations for each focus student. Additional considerations may include work
habits, social skills, social emotional/behavior and practical abilities, academic abilities, personal interests, etc.
Focus Student 1:
English Learner
What support/resources (e.g., EL coach, translation materials, primary language textbook, etc.) do you anticipate this
student will need? What differentiation strategies will you employ? What might be indicators of success?
Focus Student 2:
Special Populations
What support/resources (e.g., paraprofessional, designated instructional support, adaptive technologies, etc.) do you
anticipate this student will need? What differentiation strategies will you employ? What might be indicators of success?
Focus Student 3:
Choice
What support/resources (e.g., paraprofessional, designated instructional support, adaptive technologies, etc.) do you
anticipate this student will need? What differentiation strategies will you employ? What might be indicators of success?
Page 1 of 1
Date:
Partial Understanding
Adequate Understanding
Thorough Understanding
ALD 1
ALD 2
ALD 3
ALD 3
Page 1 of 2
Date:
2.
3.
Reflect on the Essential Components for Instructions document. For students scoring in the categories of minimal or
partial understanding, describe how the following may have impacted their learning:
a.
b.
c.
Technology Integration
d.
Other:
4.
Given the summative assessment interpretation, what additional interventions might you provide for students who did
not meet the learning targets?
5.
What needs might you anticipate for the students who exceeded the learning targets?
Page 2 of 2
Self-Assessment
Universal Access: Equity for all Students - English Learners (E-2.6a)
Differentiated Instruction:
- In what ways do
you
differentiate
instruction based
on your students
culture, levels of
acculturation,
proficiency in
English, and/or
prior schooling?
Evidence:
Evidence:
Classroom Environment
- How do you
manage and
organize your
classroom for first
and secondlanguage
learners?
Evidence:
ELD Instruction:
- How do you
support your
students
development of
academic
language and
English language
development?
Evidence:
Language Supports:
How do you use
measures of English
language proficiency
to make instructional
decisions?
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Class Profile; School and District Information/ Resources; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work; Classroom
Observations
Copyright Commission on Teacher Credentialing and the California Department of Education
Page 1 of 1
Directions: With your support provider review and discuss the standards below referencing any information gained through Conversation Guides.
Name:
Grade Level/Subject:
Standardized State
Test Results
State Language
Proficiency Test
Results
School/Grade Level
Assessments for EL
Students.
Adopted EL
Instructional Materials
Examination of State
ELD Standards
Technology Resources
for Instruction
Contextualizing
Extending
Page 1 of 1
English Learner
Resource Guide
Universal Access:
Teaching English Learners
Supporting Equity, Diversity and Access to the Core Curriculum
Name
Phone number
email address
________________________
Superintendent
__________________
__________________
________________________
County English Learner Services
Director
__________________
__________________
________________________
County CLAD, BCLAD, SDAIE
Specialists
__________________
__________________
________________________
District English Learner Services
Coordinator
__________________
__________________
________________________
School Site English Learner
Coordinator
__________________
__________________
________________________
County Speech and Language
Specialist
__________________
__________________
________________________
Other District Resource Teachers
__________________
__________________
________________________
__________________
Other School Site Resource Teachers
__________________
__________________
__________________
________________________
__________________
__________________
________________________
__________________
__________________
Table of Contents
Page #
I.
II.
Introduction
Purpose and use of this guide
Induction Standards
Induction Standard 6 Universal Access: Equity for all Students, Teaching English Learners
III.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13-14
15
16
17
18
V.
3
4
5
6
IV.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30-34
35
Resources
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Acronyms
Planning for Instruction lesson planning graphic
Equity and Inclusion - Families and Communities
Educational and Community Resources
Resources - Books and Websites
36
37
38
39
40-41
Introduction
The English Learner population is a diverse population with diverse educational needs. Some
English Learners enter our classrooms with excellent skills in their native language and strong
knowledge of academic content. Other English Learners come to us with almost no formal
educational experience and with few literacy skills. English Learners are as mixed
academically as any other group of students with the additional layer of having a different
native language!
All students both English Learners and fluent English speakers need explicit instruction in
academic language usage and skills. Each teacher in each classroom across California is
responsible for the education of all students! Each of us is legally and professionally required
to plan and implement lessons that are accessible and comprehensible to ALL students. We
must all differentiate lessons to bring each English Learner into the core curriculum TODAY
with whatever skills each has at this point in time. None of us can wait another day or for
another teacher to fill in the gaps. English Learners are our students here and now waiting
for each of us to extend the hand that will support them through this difficult and often
frightening experience called education.
This English Learner Resource Guide is designed to provide teachers with a basic overview of
the laws and processes that form the structure of English Learner programs. It will also provide
teachers with some basic information about best practices in meeting the needs of English
Learners.
Thank you for your dedication to teaching and to children!
Important Note: It is extremely important that all teachers take time to read any
District specific regulations, policies and guidelines concerning programs and
procedures for serving English Learners. Individual teachers need to be aware of
district procedures and to work within these guidelines. Further, teachers need to
be familiar with the purposes, goals and content of their own districts adopted
instructional program for English Learners. This English Learner Resource Guide
is a general resource for teachers in meeting the educational needs of English
Learners. It should be used to enhance instruction within the districts adopted
English Learner program.
English Learner-1
Section I:
Induction
Standards
The Beginning Teacher Support and
Assessment Program (BTSA)
Induction Standard 6 - Universal Access:
Equity for all Students
Teaching English Learners
English Learner-2
Section II:
Who are
English Learners?
English Learner-3
*See pg. 7
*Standard
English
Learners
Adapted from: Professional Development for California Mentors - Mentoring for Language Learner Success, 2006.
Bilingual students
schooled in the
United States
Immigrant English
Learners with
successful schooling
in their primary
language
Other learners
of Academic
English
Immigrant English
Learners with
inadequate
schooling in their
primary language
English Learner-4
Assessment that
INFORMS instruction
What Do All
Language Learners Need?
Adapted from: Professional Development for California Mentors - Mentoring for Language Learner Success, 2006.
Meaningful content,
Thematic instruction
Guided
interactions
Bridging from
prior knowledge
Explicit forms of
academic English
DAILY vocabulary
instruction
Models,Visuals,
Graphic Organizers
English Learner-5
Section III:
Critical Steps for
Determining English
Learner Placements,
Instruction and Progress
Monitoring
How?
When?
Why?
If HLS
indicates
English only
If student is
determined
I-FEP or FEP
Identified as
English Learner (EL)
No English fluency
Minimally fluent
Reasonably fluent
Placement in appropriate
district program
Structured English Immersion
English Mainstream
Alternative Program
English Learner-7
Redesignation to
FEP
(Fluent English
Proficient)
Redesignation to
FEP
(Fluent English
Proficient)
Alternative Program
Must have 20 or more students per
grade level with signed waivers
ELD instruction AND
Primary Language Instruction
Parent
Request
Option
Requires a
parental
waiver
What are the Program Placement Options for English Language Learners?
Mainstream Program
(if student is designated Early
Advanced and Advanced)
Receives:
ELD instruction
Additional/appropriate supports
Content Area support
English Learner-8
in English.
(Kindergarten and grade one are assessed in listening and speaking only.)
Who administers the CELDT test to my students? When and how does this happen in
my district? ________________________________
Where can I find the most recent test scores and who can help me interpret these as I
plan differentiated classroom lessons? ________________________________
What English Learner program options exist in my district? What additional resources
and support are offered by my district? How can I best communicate these options and
resources to my students parents or guardian?
How will I fulfill my responsibility for making the core academic curriculum accessible
to my English Language Learners no matter what subject area I teach?
English Learner-9
Beginning
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency may
demonstrate little or no receptive or productive English skills. They may be able
to respond to some communication tasks.
Early Intermediate
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency start to respond
with increasing ease to more varied communication tasks.
Intermediate
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency begin to tailor
the English language skills they have been taught to meet their immediate
communication and learning needs.
Early Advanced
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency begin to
combine the elements of the English language in complex, cognitively
demanding situations and are able to use English as a means for learning in other
academic areas.
Advanced
Students performing at this level of English language proficiency communicate
effectively with various audiences on a wide range of familiar and new topics to
meet social and academic demands. In order to attain the English proficiency
level of their native English-speaking peers, further linguistic enhancement and
refinement are necessary.
English Learner-10
English Learner-11
Beginning
Severely limited
comprehension.
Numerous errors
with severely limited
communication.
Predictable - with
visuals that match
text and simple
language structures.
Proficiency
Levels
Comprehension
Oral Response
Usage
Level of Text
Difficulty
Written
Response
Familiar, patterned,
predictable,
decodable with
contextualized
vocabulary and
language structures.
Writes simple
sentences with
common vocabulary
and grammatical
forms.
Inconsistent comprehension
of literal and reorganizing
information. Limited
comprehension of inference
and evaluation.
Intermediate
Responds using
phrases and simple
sentences. Can
compare & contrast
sounds in basic
words. Focus on
expanding noun and
verb phrases.
Developing
comprehension of
literal; limited
understanding of
reorganizing
information,
inference, and
evaluation.
Early
Intermediate
Writes with
consistent use of
standard grammatical
forms appropriate to
varied genres.
Approximates grade
level text with varied
vocabulary and
language structures
across genres.
Standard grammar
with few random
errors.
Consistent
comprehension of
literal and
reorganizing
information.
Inconsistent
comprehension of
inference and
evaluation.
Initiates and responds
w/detail in compound
& complex sentences
that are extended and
expanded. Focus on
variety in all aspects
of grammar.
Early Advanced
Standard grammar
with conventions for
formal and informal
use in place.
Grade-level text
across a variety of
genres.
Initiates and
negotiates using
flexible discourse
styles appropriate to
setting.
Consistent in all
types of
comprehension.
Advanced
The Student Proficiency Report (this is the bar-graph returned to you by the state) or the
student score sheet (if the CELDT was hand scored by teachers) can help you determine what
types of supports students will need to increase their competence in all academic areas.
Here is one method for interpreting CELDT scores:
Identify the students CELDT score in each skill area and their overall proficiency level.
(Example: Early Intermediate in writing but Intermediate in the overall proficiency level)
Review the description of the students language proficiency on the back of the CELDT.
Determine whether the student is able to perform grade-level tasks. (Example: All of the
students scores are at the Intermediate level except writing, which is at the Beginning level this
student will need additional support in writing)
Determine what type of support will be provided. (Example: simple to complex grammatical
forms, greater variety of academic vocabulary, writing with greater fluency and accuracy,
strengthening reading skills)
Look across a class or grade level for patterns that emerge from the CELDT data. Are there
clusters of students that need the same type of support? How can clusters or individual students
best be served?
Additionally, if the CELDT is hand scored, use the student score sheet to guide areas of
emphasis in reading (word analysis, fluency and vocabulary, and comprehension) and writing
(grammar and structure, sentence construction, and short compositions).
English Learner-12
The California Department of Education (CDE) has developed an online MATRIX that provides
K-12 teachers with a side-by-side comparison of the California English Language Arts (ELA)
standards and the California English Language Development (ELD) standards.
In addition to the separate, required 30-45 minutes of ELD instruction per day for English
Learners, it is important for ALL teachers to see how the ELA/ELD standards fit together within a
core curriculum. By seeing and using the side-by-side matrix of standards as a guide, teachers
can more easily design lessons that are differentiated to meet the wide range of language abilities
that are often present in one classroom. Additionally, awareness of the specific language abilities
of EL students at each identified proficiency level will assist in planning across the curriculum
whether you are a biology, history or algebra teacher. Knowing the specific language abilities and
instructional needs of individual students will help you design lessons that allow access to your
core curriculum no matter what the subject area! The ELD standards are designed to scaffold
English Learners into the mainstream ELA program. The ELD standards can support teachers in
designing instruction that is responsive to their EL student needs.
The ELA/ELD Standards Correlations Matrices you will find at this website address the following
domains:
Listening and Speaking Strategies and Applications
Writing Strategies and Applications
Written and Oral English-Language Conventions
Reading: Word Analysis. Fluency, Systematic Vocabulary Development,
Comprehension and Literacy Response and Analysis
In addition to these domains, all matrices address the four ELD proficiency levels identified on
the CELDT:
Beginning
Early Intermediate
Intermediate
Early Advanced
Teachers can use these matrices to see exactly what skills and content should be covered
depending on the current identified proficiency level of their individual EL students. In this
way, daily lessons in any core content area can be differentiated to meet the needs of ALL students
in relationship to language proficiency.
Another important use for the ELA/ELD matrices is as an assessment tool. Each matrix provides
a rubric for the teacher to use to assess the progress of their EL students as they move through the
various English language proficiency levels within the subject matter content.
Teachers can download the matrices appropriate to their grade level.
The following page provides a sample of what you will find at this site.
English Learner-13
English Learner-14
Beginning
EI1. Write simple
sentences to
respond to selected
literature, exhibit
factual
understanding of
the text, and
connect ones own
experience to
specific parts of the
text.
EI2. Use common
verbs, nouns, and
high-frequency
modifiers in
writing simple
sentences.
EI3. Use simple
sentences to create
a draft of a short
essay that follows
an outline.
EI4. Write an
increasing number
of words and
simple sentences
appropriate for
language arts and
other content areas
(e.g., math,
science, historysocial science).
EI5. Write
expository
compositions, such
as descriptions,
comparison
Early Intermediate
I1. Narrate a
sequence of events
and communicate
their significance to
the audience.
I2. Write brief
expository
compositions and
reports that (a)
include a thesis and
some supporting
details; (b) provide
information from
primary sources;
and (c) include
charts and graphs.
I3. Recognize
elements of
characterization in
a piece of writing
and apply the same
techniques when
writing.
Intermediate
EA2. Develop a
clear thesis and
support it by using
analogies,
quotations, and
facts appropriately.
EA3. Write
persuasive
compositions that
structure ideas and
arguments in a
logical way with
consistent use of
standard
grammatical forms.
EA4. Use
appropriate
language variations
and genres in
writing for
language arts and
other content areas.
EA5. Fill out job
applications and
prepare rsums
that are clear and
purposeful and
address the
intended audience
appropriately.
EA1. Identify in
writing the various
elements of
discourse (e.g.,
purpose, speaker,
audience, form).
Early Advanced
Grades 11-12
ELD Writing: Strategies and Applications Standards
Advanced
Students write
coherent and focused
texts that convey a
well-defined
perspective and tightly
reasoned argument.
The writing
demonstrates students
awareness of the
audience and purpose
and progression
through the stages of
the writing process.
Organization and
Focus
1.1 Demonstrate an
understanding of the
elements of discourse
(e.g., purpose, speaker,
audience, form) when
completing narrative,
expository, persuasive,
or descriptive writing
assignments.
1.2 Use point of view,
characterization, style
(e.g., use of irony),
and related elements
for specific rhetorical
and aesthetic purposes.
1.0 Writing
Strategies
Writing
Grades 11-12
ELA
Standards
Districts must have a strong rationale for the time they devote to ELD, generally from 30
45 minutes daily in the elementary school and one designated period in the middle and high
schools.
The purpose of ELD is to teach English learners to understand, speak, read, and write
English and to provide students with explicit instruction in English Language Development
(ELD) necessary to develop academic proficiency and mastery of the English Language Arts
content standards.
Remember that EL students are facing the double challenge of learning English, while
learning the academic content required for their success. This can be a daunting
challenge.
The mission of ELD is to teach English. The content of instruction for ELD is to
understand, practice and use English in a variety of settings and across a variety of contexts.
ELD instruction based on the ELD Standards - is absolutely necessary for the academic
success of EL students.
English Learners must learn English while competing with Native English speakers who are
rapidly increasing their knowledge of English and applying this knowledge to content standards.
While many English Learners appear fluent, they may have significant gaps in the language and
knowledge. Teachers need to be aware of these gaps and design lessons that address these specific
learning needs for EL students.
Simply teaching in English is very different from ELD instruction. ELD instruction supports
students in reaching the goal of academic and linguistic parity with their English only peers
through focused, scaffolded language development.
The focus of teaching in a regular, subject-area classroom is the content. In well designed
content area instruction - that includes EL students - there should always be an underlying
language objective that connects to the students understanding of the topic and increases their
ability to talk about that topic using academic language.
English Learner-15
Schools can use CELDT results in conjunction with the California Standards Test (CST)
scores to monitor students progress in determining overall areas of student strength and
weakness. The Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives set by the state under Title
III anticipate that a student will progress one proficiency level for each year they are
enrolled in an EL program. For example, if a student scores at the beginning level the
first year enrolled in a program, the following year it would be anticipated that they
would score early intermediate. Some districts anticipate that students will spend two
years at the intermediate level and will take 6 years to reach English proficiency. At
the end of six years these districts anticipate that students will be scoring Early Advanced
or Advanced on the CELDT and proficient or above on the CST.
Year in Program
1
2
3
4
5
6
CST Score
Far Below Basic or above
Below Basic or above
Basic or above
Basic or above
Proficient or above
Proficient or above
English Learner-16
The State Board of Education (SBE) has established four reclassification criteria,
which all school districts must use:
1. An assessment of English language proficiency must be given. In California this is the
California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
2. A teacher evaluation of the students academic performance, which can be based on the
students report card grades, grade point average (GPA), or other measure that school
districts use to determine students academic performance.
3. Parent opinion and consultation, which involves parents or guardians, if possible, in a
discussion about their students English language proficiency and meeting the
guidelines for reclassification.
4. A comparison of performance in basic skills, which the SBE has indicated should be
based on results of the students latest California English-Language Arts Standards Test,
or CST in English-Language Arts.
English Learner-17
Section IV:
Unique Aspects
of English Learner
Instruction in
Mainstream Classrooms
What to teach.
How to teach it.
Direct open-ended questioning and conversation help teachers learn about student
background.
Students must receive multiple forms of input that build virtual experiences with a concept.
Emphasize key content vocabulary multiple times, in varied contexts.
Help students make explicit connections to personalize new word learning.
A focus on the use of visuals (pictures, Thinking Maps, movie clips, graphic organizers)
can assist students in developing concepts.
Structured student interactions (cooperative learning activities, partners) allow students to
explore their previous experiences and thoughts while connecting new language and ideas
regarding the concept being developed. English Learners need to TALK to other students!
Background building can also be done through direct experiences such as field trips, oncampus activities, and presentations by experts.
Source: Building Background Knowledge for Academic Achievement. Robert Marzano, ASCD, 2004
Research Findings
Robert Marzano describes six principals for building background during a classroom lesson:
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
R
e
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
1. Write the word on the board, chart, or a word card. Say the word and ask students to
chorally repeat the word. Present students with a brief explanation or description of
the new term or phrase.
Write the word
Say the word
Students chorally repeat the word
Describe or define the word in student terms
2. Ask students to generate their own explanations or descriptions of the term or phrase.
Have they ever seen the word? Heard the word?
What do they think it means?
Write the word and their student generated definition in their Word Journal
3. Ask students to create their own nonlinguistic representation of the term or phrase.
By doing Quick draws
By using gestures
Through using pantomime
By drawing a picture in their Word Journal
4. Present activities that help students add to their knowledge of vocabulary terms.
Open ended questioning
Comparing/Contrasting terms
Examples and Non-examples
Revising initial descriptions or non-linguistic representations
Using understanding of roots and affixes to deepen knowledge of terms
5. Periodically ask students to discuss terms.
Find their favorite word and explain why.
Find hard words and work in teams to depict the term non-linguistically or to
develop alternative descriptions.
In teams, identify: Whats new? Whats true? Whats false? Whats confusing?
about a term and present their findings to the class.
6. Students periodically review the terms with games and other activities.
Pictionary
Card games that emphasize semantic relationships: synonyms, antonyms,
descriptions, pictures/word matching, English/Spanish
Bingo with descriptions
Race and chase games
English Learner-22
Every lesson
Every child
Students assimilate grammar, syntax, and semantic information when they are learning
about history, science, or math, as language is repeated naturally across disciplines
Understanding academic language and using it effectively in academic settings is
essential for English language learners and native speakers of English alike.
Freeman and Freeman - Research-Based Strategies for English Language Learners
(4)
Identify a tool you will give your
students to help them remember
what they have learned.
(2)
Identify specific strategy(ies)
you will use to teach these words.
(3)
Identify specific ways you will
ask students
to practice these words.
English Learner-23
English Learner-24
Frontloading Instruction:
What they need to know BEFORE you begin the main lesson
Frontloading content area instruction gives students a preview of what they need in order to be
successful in an upcoming lesson.
Frontloading allows teachers to work with important concepts, vocabulary, and language
structures, including how words and sentences are put together - so that students will be able to
successfully access the content of their grade level and subject areas.
The goal of frontloading is to develop grade level proficiency in a content area. It is not just
teaching in English, but rather, teaching about the type of English that is required by a specific
content area. Remember: the goal is to prepare students to participate in regular classroom
instruction in a content area.
Frontloading is characterized by:
Instruction that addresses Content Area standards - using ELD standards as a support.
Instruction that focuses on communicating understanding in the content area.
Development of student understanding of content, while progressively increasingly precise,
sophisticated language usage.
Use of language to communicate understanding through listening, speaking, reading and writing.
Teaching in functional contexts bringing prior knowledge and familiar vocabulary into new
contexts and settings.
How to frontload instruction:
Identify one content area goal will students compare/contrast, describe, sequence?
Identify one important language structure needed to talk and write about the content goal. (ex.
students need conjunctions that reflect relationships or negative statements to compare/contrast.
Students need signal words that show time to sequence first, next, last, consequently, finally.)
Identify 5-7 words that are important to understanding the content.
Teach explicitly the 5-7 vocabulary words - model student friendly definitions; ask students to
repeat the words; identify the parts of speech, use the words in examples, and then ask students to
use the words in additional examples. Always use visualsshow them or draw a picture, act it
out, use gestures.
Teach the language structure by using model text from the piece they will be using. Identify a
sentence that shows the use of sequence words; ask them to identify the sequence words, and then
to replace the words with synonyms.
Build their background around the content by questioning, using visuals (ex. short movie clips,
pictures, books)
Strategically use native language to make connections to English
Ask them to talk, listen to others, read, and write about the topic.
English Learner-25
Instructional Strategies:
Structuring Active/Accountable Engagement
Research confirms what every teacher knows: Students who are most in need of instruction,
are least engaged in it!
Far too many underperforming students view learning in the content areas as a spectator sport
and they are often allowed to adopt a passive role in their classrooms. In terms of effectively
developing skills and knowledge in the content areas, the implications are enormous.
Classroom teachers need efficient and effective instructional strategies to insure that all students
are actively and accountably responding to all lesson content - especially students who are in need
of academic intervention!
There are a number of general active engagement strategies teachers need to have in their instructional
tool kits to activate and engage the full range of students served in mixed ability content area
classrooms. Examples include: a written prediction, an answer shared with a partner, signal thumbs
up if you agree, etc. In each case there must be observable evidence that students are making sense of
the instruction, not simply acting as passive observers.
Strategies to use:
Assign every student a partner and use these partners regularly to practice what
has been taught, to rehearse answers, etc.
Use choral responses which will allow all students to practice together when
answers are short/identical (e.g. pronouncing a new vocabulary term). This can
also be done non-verbally (e.g. all write on individual white boards; touch under
the first word; thumbs up if you agree; etc.).
Structure academic language using sentence starters and sentence frames (e.g.
One important attribute of this character is _____; One aspect of the story that
was surprising was _______).
Examples of Cognates
English
angle
gulf
volcanic
Spanish
angulo
gulfo
volcanico
A word of caution: some words may look like cognates, but they are not. They are false cognates.
For example: inferior in Spanish may be used to refer to a subordinate in the work-place, without
carrying any derogatory meaning as in the English usage. In Spanish informal means unreliable
rather than casual. In spite of these false cognates, there are thousands of English words that can be
converted into Spanish along with much of their English meaning (especially the literal).
English
Conference (meeting)
Disgrace (shame)
Embarrassed (feeling shame)
Once (one time)
Sane (rational)
Spanish
Conferencia (lecture)
Desgracia (misfortune)
Embarazada (pregnant)
Once (eleven)
Sano (healthy)
English Learner-28
Research-based
Instructional
Strategy
Differentiation by
Proficiency Levels
Support Strategies
Setting Goals
Students understand
what they are
working towards.
EL students
understand the focus
for both content area
and language
development
Providing Feedback
Students use teacher
feedback to rephrase
and restructure
language and
content, while
teachers model
repairing and
reformulating
academic language
English Learner-30
Non-Linguistic
Representations
Elaborate
instruction with
nonlinguistic
representations to
help students recall,
think about and
retain information
B - Responds in gestures
Advanced
Organizers
Use before a lesson
to highlight
essential ideas and
to assist students in
making connections
to new learning
EI - Responds to yes/no,
either/or, one or two word
responses
I Responds in short
phrases/sentences, How? Why?
What if?
EA - Responds to all types of
questions with few grammatical
errors
A Approximates native
English speakers language use
Cooperative
Learning
Use to increase the
opportunities to
speak and use
language for an
academic task. Also
increase
opportunities to hear
and use key words
and phrases,
increase feedback
and reduce anxiety.
B Physical or pictorial
representations with pointing in
share out
EI Non-linguistic
representation with words,
phrases, sentence starters
I Graphic organizers assist in
students explaining, presenting
in full sentences
EA Works alongside English
only peer with some errors in
speech and writing
A Approximates native
English speakers language use
Summarizing
EL students are
explicitly taught to
recognize text
patterns and the
signal words that
accompany them.
B - Substitute common,
frequently used vocabulary and
attach to key vocabulary terms
(3 + 3 rule)
EI Use non-linguistic
representations to teach steps in
developing a summary
I - Point out what is important
and not important
EA - Use graphic organizers
keyed to text pattern
A - Approximates native
English speakers language use
Model repeatedly a
particular set of steps keep,
delete, substitute
Use graphic organizers with
specific questions attached
Model and use reciprocal
teaching
Attach pictures to key
vocabulary
Use summaries to preview a
text
Create summaries after
important text is read to
deepen understanding
Note Taking
Students extract
important information
and synthesize it into
their own words. The
purpose of note taking
is to acquire,
integrate, organize
and process
information.
English Learner-32
Research-based
Instructional
Strategy
Differentiation by
Proficiency Levels
Support Strategies
Practice
Students practice to
deepen understanding
of content and to
reach automaticity
with skills and
processes
Generating and
Testing Hypotheses
Identifying
Similarities and
Differences
Students are given the
opportunity to deepen
learning by activating
prior knowledge,
making connections,
constructing meaning
and justifying their
reasoning.
Reinforcing Effort
and Providing
Recognition
Students understand
the relationship
between effort and
achievement
Based on the book: Classroom Instruction that Works with English Language Learners by Jane
Hill and Kathleen Flynn, 2006, ASCD.
English Learner-34
English Learner-35
Section V:
Resources
Assessment:
Essential Understanding:
Essential Skills:
Content Focus:
Language Focus:
Target Vocabulary:
Inquiry Chart
Observation Chart
Roundtable
Whip
Input Chart
Word Storming
Anchor Chart
Coop Paragraphs
Sentence Frames
Story Maps
(De)Construct Words
Listen/Visualize
Thinking Maps
Cornell Notes
Questioning
Sentence Structure
Whip Around
Choral Response
In/Outside Circle
Ear/Ear reading
Think/Pair/Share
Give one/Get one
Talking Chips
Numbered Heads
Roundtable
Jigsaw
English Learner-37
English Learner-38
Educational and
Community Resources
Investigate Local Resources
1. ALL County Offices of Education (even those outside of your area) - The
Sonoma County Office of Education has many online resources and references
regarding English Language Learners. Go to: www.scoe.org. In the Search
Box enter: English Learners. Click on Aiming High Resources and you will gain
access to a variety of extremely teacher-friendly Newsletters that provide
specific teaching strategies and ideas and current research information about
English Learners. Click on English Language Learner Services and you will
access important programs and classes.
2. Migrant Education Go to: www.cde.ca.gov/sp/me/mt/programs.asp for
information about programs across California that are available to migrant
students.
3. Indian Health Services Go to: www.ihs.gov for information about services
available in your county to Native American students and families.
4. Site level English Learner Advisory Committees (ELAC) and district level
Advisory Committees (DELAC) these are important committees for active
participation of parents in the educational decisions that impact their children.
Go to some of these meetings if you can. Become involved in decisions made
at the school site level.
5. Parent Involvement Information Go to: www.ed.gov/offices/OELA (the
Office of English Language Acquisition) for specific information about parent
programs and information for parents that they can read and download (in
both Spanish and English).
6. Get to know your students parents Take a few minutes each week to
contact the parent or guardian of an EL student. Talk about his or her progress
and one or two specific things the parent can do to assist with and encourage
learning. Let parents know that you consider them a resource in their own
childs education.
7. University, Community College and District Resources University and
English Learner-39
Resources
Books
Accelerating Academic English: A Focus on the English Learner, Robin C.
Scarella, University of California, Irvine, 2003.
Bringing It All Together, Language and Literacy in the Multilingual Classroom,
Marcia Brechtel, 2001. This book is based on the Guided Language Acquisition Design
(GLAD) program. While focused on ELL students, it provides some excellent
background building strategies that can be used with all students across the grade
levels.
Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction, Beck, I.L., McKeown,
M.G., & Kucan, L. (2002). New York: Guilford Press.
Building Background Knowledge for Academic Achievement: Research on
What Works in Schools, Robert J. Marzano, 2004.
Effective Instruction For English-Language Learners: What We Know About
Effective Instructional Practices For English-Language Learners, Gersten, R., &
Baker, S. (2000)
Fifty Strategies for Teaching English Language Learners, Herrell and Jordan,
Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
From Speech to Print, Louisa Cook Moats, 2000. This is a comprehensive review of
why language is foundational for teaching children to read systematically and explicitly.
This book helps teachers understand the organization of written and spoken English,
the connections between structures, and how to apply these ideas in lessons.
Instructional Strategies That Work With English Language Learners, Jane Hill,
ASCD publications at www.ascd.org.
Overcoming the Language Gap: Making Better Use of the Literacy Time Block,
Hirsch, E.D. (2001). American Educator, 25, pg. 5-7
Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning, Teaching Second Language
Learners in the Mainstream Classroom, Pauline Gibbons, 2002. This book assists
mainstream classroom teachers to integrate the teaching of English with content areas
and outlines specific strategies to help accomplish this.
Student Successes with Thinking Maps, edited by David Hyerle, Corwin Press,
2004.
Summarization in Any Subject - 50 techniques to Improve Student Learning,
Rick Wormeli, Available through ASCD at www.ascd.org.
What teachers Need To Know About Language, Snow, S.E. and Wong-Fillmore, L.
(2001). A special report from ERIC Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics at
www.cal.org.ericcll/teachers/teachers/pdf.
English Learner-40
Websites
Aiming High Newsletters provide a wealth of practical teaching strategies and
research-based information to help teachers in addressing the learning needs of
their EL students. Go to: www.scoe.org. In the Search Box enter: Aiming High,
then go to the Resources section. All newsletters can be downloaded.
Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence at
www.crede.ucsc.edu
Colorin Colorado is an excellent source for language and literacy development
ideas and background research for young children. The website is:
http://www.colorincolorado.org/
Designs For Thinking Go to: www.mapthemind.com
English Language Development Standards - For information contact:
California Department of Education at www.cde.ca.gov.
Ideas for student note taking: For information on Cornell Notes see these
websites:
www.clt.cornell.edu/campus/ learn/LSC%20Resources/cornellsystem.pdf
http://americandigest.org/mt-archives/004983.php
For training and additional information on Cornell Notes and other summarization
activities contact AVID (Advancement Via Individual Determination) at
www.scoe.org.
The National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition provides an In
The Classroom toolkit designed to bring research and practice together for English
Language Learners. Go to: www.ncela.gwu.edu
The Reading Corner - Sonoma County Office of Education You will find a
wide variety of relevant postings. Be sure to check out the seminar notes from
master teacher, Dr. Anita Archer, describing various structured engagement
strategies (web link) and the streaming video demonstrating these strategies in a
4th grade classroom (web link). Go to: http://www.scoe.org/readingcorner
Thinking Maps - The Sonoma County Office of Education is supporting Organizing
Student Thinking (OST), a school-wide initiative using a specific set of graphic
organizers called Thinking Maps. Thinking Maps are eight visual tools that are
attached to a specific fundamental cognitive process such as defining in context,
comparing and contrasting, and cause and effect. This distinguishing feature of
providing a distinctive visual tool connected to a specific cognitive process, makes
Thinking Maps unique among graphic organizers. The thinking is emphasized
rather than the graphic organizer. For more information go to: www.scoe.org In
the Search Box enter: Organizing Student Thinking.
Thinking Maps, Inc. Go to: www.thinkingmaps.com
English Learner-41
Notes
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
Identification of Class
Profile Students:
Health Problems
Individual Education
Plans (IEP)
SST Interventions
504 Plans
Goals/benchmarks
Modifications, accommodations,
variations
Extending
English learners
Language/Learning
Disability
Page 1 of 1
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
Identification of Class
Profile Students:
Health Problems
Individual Education
Plans (IEP)
SST Interventions
504 Plans
Goals/benchmarks
Modifications, accommodations,
variations
Extending
English learners
Language/Learning
Disability
Page 1 of 1
Yes No
SELF-ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION
Year 1 Candidates Only
Scripter:_____________________________________________
Facilitator: ___________________________________________
Self-Assessment: Equity
4. Describe how you support ALL students in your
classroom
5. Describe how you effectively communicate
with:
a. Students
b. Colleagues
c. Families
Self-Assessment: Pedagogy
1. Explain how you create a safe, well managed
environment
2. Describe how you use assessment data to
monitor student progress and meet the diverse
learning needs of your students
3. Tell how you use technology to help students
learn
Scripter Notes
Self Assessment
Teacher:_________________________________________________________District:_________________________________________ Date:___________
SP Reviewer________________________________________
Yes No
EDUCATION SPECIALIST
SELF-ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION
Scripter:_____________________________________________
Facilitator: ___________________________________________
Social intervention
Academic intervention
Advanced level data driven instruction
Behavioral intervention
Current legal issues
Scripter Notes
Self Assessment
Teacher:_________________________________________________________District:_________________________________________ Date:___________
SP Reviewer________________________________________
Yes No
EDUCATION SPECIALIST
SELF-ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION
(Preliminary Year Two)
Scripter:_____________________________________________
Facilitator: ___________________________________________
Social intervention
Academic intervention
Advanced level data driven instruction
Behavioral intervention
Current legal issues
Scripter Notes
Self Assessment
Teacher:_________________________________________________________District:_________________________________________ Date:___________
SP Reviewer________________________________________
SelfAssessmentPresentation
Level2OnlywithaNEWEd
Spec.PreliminaryCredential
SelfAssessmentPresentation
Level2Competencies
Level2Only(BTSAiscomplete) Level2Competencies
SelfAssessmentPresentation
FullBTSA,Year2withaNEW
Ed.Spec.PreliminaryCredential
SelfAssessmentPresentation
Level2Competencies
FullBTSA,Year2withaLevel1 Level2Competencies
SelfAssessmentPresentation
SelfAssessmentPresentation
FourthEd.SpecialistSaturday
FullBTSA,Year1withaNEW
Ed.Spec.PreliminaryCredential
ThirdEd.SpecialistSaturday
SelfAssessmentPresentation
FullBTSA,Year1withaLevel1 SelfAssessmentPresentation
EducationSpecialistSaturday
PresentationSchedule
Revised
20142015
Scripter:_______________________________________________
MILD/MODERATE AUTHORIZATION
Yes No
Scripter Notes
Discussion Prompts
SP Reviewer________________________________________
Scripter:_______________________________________________
MODERATE/SEVERE AUTHORIZATION
Yes No
Discussion Prompts
SP Reviewer________________________________________
Scripter:_______________________________________________
Yes No
Scripter Notes
Discussion Prompts
SP Reviewer________________________________________
2014-15
Optional
CSUS Units
Credential Candidates
Support Providers
SP
PT
ES
Dawn McCarron
Program Analyst
(916) 228-2496
dmccarron@scoe.net
Fax: 916-228-3921
Website: www.btsasacramento.org
Facebook Page:
www.facebook.com/btsasacramento.org
How many years of experience do you have in your role of coordinator or advisor?
j 02years
k
l
m
n
j 35years
k
l
m
n
j 6ormoreyears
k
l
m
n
Are you aware of program improvements that have been made in this induction program
based on feedback from participants?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
Program Ratings
Pleaseindicatetheextenttowhicheachstatementistrue.
Fortheseratings,5=highand1=low.Select"DK"ifyoudonotknowtheanswer.
Part 1: Regarding the BTSA program, please rate the extent that...
5(high)
1(low)
DK
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
3.SCOEleadershavestrongsupportfromthedistrict.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
4.SCOEhasawelldefinedandmonitoredprocessforensuringthatall
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
1.theSCOEprogramhasaclear,researchedbasedvisionforthe
inductionofnewteacherswhichisarticulatedwithstakeholders.
2.theSCOEprogramleadersandrelevantstakeholdersarehighly
involvedintheorganization,governance,andcoordinationofthis
program.
participatingteachershavemetallcredentialrequirements.
5.SCOEprovidessufficientfunding,personnel,andfacilityresourcesare
consistentlyallocatedtothisprogramtoenableeffectiveoperationand
support.
6.theresourceneedsoftheSCOEprogramareregularlyreviewed,
evaluated,andupdated.
Page 1
5(high)
1(low)
DK
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
developmentprovidersandseminarfacilitators.
8.theactivitiesoftheSCOEprogramarealogicallysequenced
extensiontoparticipatingteacherpreservicelearning.
9.thereisclosecollaborationbetweentheSCOEprogramanddistrict
administration.
10.therequirementsfortheparticipatingteachertocompletethis
Inductionprogramareclear.
11.theparticipatingteachersintheSCOEprogramhaveopportunitiesto
learnabouttheapplicationoftechnologytostudentlearning.
Part 3: Regarding the BTSA program, please rate the extent that...
12.participatingteachershaveresourcesandopportunitiesthatwillassist
5(high)
1(low)
DK
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
theminimprovingtheirskillsindevelopingstrategiesforteaching
Englishlearners.
13.participatingteachershaveresourcesandopportunitiesthatwillassist
theminimprovingtheirskillsteachingstudentsthathavedisabilities,are
atrisk,oraregiftedandtalented.
14.participatingteachershaveresourcesandopportunitiesintheareas
ofdifferentiatinginstructiontomeetthevariousneedsofstudents.
15.thereissufficientevidenceregardingcandidateprogressand
performancetoguideadvisementandassistanceefforts.
16.theSCOEprogramprovidescandidatessufficientopportunitiesto
developresearchbasedstrategiesforimprovingstudentlearning.
17.theSCOEprogrampreparescandidateswiththeproficienciesand
competenciestoeducateandeffectivelysupportallstudents.
What do you believe are the most effective components of the BTSA program?
5
Page 2
Thissurveywillbekeptconfidentialandnotsharedwithyoursupportprovider.Resultswillbeusedtohelpguidetrainingforsupportprovidersand
helpthemtodevelopactionplans.Toprogressthroughthesurvey,pleaseusethefollowingnavigationlinks:
ClicktheNextbuttontocontinuetothenextpage.
ClickthePreviousbuttontoreturntothepreviouspage.
ClicktheSubmitbuttontosubmityourcompletedsurvey.
Thankyouinadvanceforyourtime.
Respondent Information
j SecondYear
k
l
m
n
2. Please select the school district or agency where you currently work.
6
4. Are you and your support provider using the ContinuumofTeachingPractice to assess
your progress?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No(pleaseexplain)
k
l
m
n
Appointment Logistics
5. Does your support provider schedule and keep regular appointments with you?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
Page 1
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
7. Please rate your support provider's knowledge and skill in the following areas:
Weak
Average
Strong
Usingourmeetingtimeeffectively
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Sharingbehaviormanagementstrategies
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
SharingstrategiesandresourcesforteachingEnglishlearners
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
SharingstrategiesandresourcesforaddressingtheneedsofspecialpopulationsincludingGATE
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
students
8. Please rate your support provider's knowledge and skill in the following areas:
Weak
Average
Strong
Identifyinginstructionalstrategiesandmaterialsappropriatetomyteachingcontext
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Creatingatrustingrelationshipwithme
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Usingreflectiveconversationtechniques
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
HelpingmedevelopanIndividualInductionPlan(IIP)basedonassessmentevidence
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
9. Please rate your support provider's knowledge and skill in the following areas:
Weak
Average
Strong
Analyzingstudentwork
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Reviewingtheinformationfromaclassroomobservationandprovidingconstructivefeedback
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Understandingthe"Plan,Teach,Reflect,andApplyCycle"
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Assistingmeinunderstandingmycontextforteaching
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Page 2
Average
Strong
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
AssessingmyteachingpracticebasedontheCaliforniaStandardsfortheTeachingProfession
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
HelpingmeselectprofessionaldevelopmentthatisalignedtomyIIP
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
UsingthedocumentsintheFormativeAssessmentforCaliforniaTeachers(FACT)
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Understandingtherequirementsformetocompletethisprogramandclearmycredential
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Usingthestateadoptedcontentstandards,curriculumframeworks,andcontentspecificpedagogyto
improvetheperformanceofmystudents
Final Instructions
Thankyoufortakingthetimetocompletethissurvey.
PleaseclickontheSUBMITbuttonbelowtosendinyourresponses.
Page 3
Section I
ThefollowingsurveywasdevelopedtobetterunderstandtheextenttowhichtheSacramentoBTSAInductionConsortiumisfulfillingtheInduction
ProgramStandardsofprogramqualityandeffectivenessadoptedbytheCommissiononTeacherCredentialing.
Toprogressthroughthesurvey,pleaseusethefollowingnavigationlinks:
ClicktheNextbuttontocontinuetothenextpage.
ClickthePreviousbuttontoreturntothepreviouspage.
ClicktheSubmitbuttontosubmityourcompletedsurvey.
Thankyouinadvanceforyourtime.
Section II
j SecondYear
k
l
m
n
4. Are you and your support provider using the ContinuumofTeachingPractice to assess
your progress?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No(pleaseexplain)
k
l
m
n
5
6
Section III
Page 1
Moderately
Strongly
Agree
Agree
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
earningaclearteachingcredential.
b)Mydistricthasprovidedadequateresourcesandsupporttoenablemetobecomea
betterteacher.
c)Ihavesufficientopportunitiestoworkwithspecialeducationteacherstosupportmy
students.
d)ProfessionaldevelopmentinmyschoolanddistrictalignwellwithmyBTSA
activities.
Section IV
6. Please select the response that best describes how much you agree or disagree with
the following general statements about your BTSA support provider.
Mysupportprovider...
DoNotAgree SlightlyAgree
Moderately
Strongly
Agree
Agree
a)Isaskilledmentorandguide.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
b)EffectivelyusestheFormativeAssessmentforCaliforniaTeachers(FACT)tohelp
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
d)Effectivelyusesevidenceandassessmentstoguideourworktogether.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
e)Sharesusefulinstructionalideasandmaterialswithme.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
meexaminemypractice.
c)EffectivelyguidesthedevelopmentandimplementationofmyIndividualInduction
Plan(IIP).
Section V
Page 2
Moderately
Strongly
Agree
Agree
a)Classroommanagement.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
b)Assessingstudentsspecificlearningneeds.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
c)Planninganddifferentiatinginstructiontomeetthediverselearningneedsofthe
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
d)TeachingandsupportingEnglishLearners.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
e)Designingandimplementinganequitableandinclusivelearningenvironmentin
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
g)Usingavarietyofresourcestocollaboratewithstudentsandtheirfamilies.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
h)Usingassessmentdatatomonitorstudentprogress.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
i)Communicatingwithstudentsfamiliesabouttheirprogress.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
fullrangeoflearners.
myclassroom.
f)Maximizingacademicachievementforstudentsfromvariousbackgroundsand
experiences.
Section IV
8. Comments
Please share any comments or concerns here.
5
6
Thankyoufortakingthetimetocompletethissurvey.
PleaseclickontheSUBMITbuttonbelowtosendinyourresponsesandreceiveacodetodocumentthatthistaskhas
beencompleted.
Page 3
ThefollowingsurveywasdevelopedtobetterunderstandtheextenttowhichtheSacramentoBTSAInductionConsortiumisfulfillingtheInduction
ProgramStandardsofprogramqualityandeffectivenessadoptedbytheCommissiononTeacherCredentialing.
Toprogressthroughthesurvey,pleaseusethefollowingnavigationlinks:
ClicktheNextbuttontocontinuetothenextpage.
ClickthePreviousbuttontoreturntothepreviouspage.
ClicktheSubmitbuttontosubmityourcompletedsurvey.
Thankyouinadvanceforyourtime.
Section II
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No(Pleaseexplain)
k
l
m
n
5
6
4. Have you and your participating teacher(s) revisited, reflected on, and updated a
professional growth plan (IIP)?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No(pleaseexplain)
k
l
m
n
5
6
Page 1
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No(pleaseexplain)
k
l
m
n
5
6
6. Have you led your participating teacher(s) in an assessment of their own teaching
practice?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No(pleaseexplain)
k
l
m
n
5
6
Section III
7. Have you and your participating teacher(s) developed and used instructional strategies
based on stateadopted academic content standards and students' performance levels?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No(pleaseexplain)
k
l
m
n
5
6
8. Has the BTSA program provided you with the opportunity to reflect on your own level of
practice and plan for your own personal professional growth?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No(pleaseexplain)
k
l
m
n
5
6
Page 2
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No(pleaseexplain)
k
l
m
n
5
6
Section IV
10. Please select the response that best describes how much you agree or disagree with
the following
general statements about your experience as a BTSA support provider.
DoNotAgree SlightlyAgree
a)IunderstandtherequirementsforcompletingtheBTSAInductionProgramand
Moderately
Strongly
Agree
Agree
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
earningaclearteachingcredential.
b)ProfessionaldevelopmentinmyschoolanddistrictalignwellwithmyBTSA
activities.
c)Mydistrictprovidesadequateresourcesandsupporttoenablemetofulfillmyrole
asasupportprovider.
d)Myparticipatingteachershavesufficientopportunitiestoworkwithspecial
educationteacherstosupporttheirstudents.
e)Myparticipatingteachershavesufficientaccesstotechnologythatsupports
teachingandstudentlearning.
f)Ihavesufficienttimetomeetwithpeerstodevelopandrefinemysupportprovider
skills,engageinproblemsolving,andreflectonteaching.
Section V
11. Please select the response that best describes how much you agree or disagree with
the following general statements about your role as a BTSA support provider.
Iamabletosupportmyparticipatingteacher(s)byproviding...
DoNotAgree SlightlyAgree
Moderately
Strongly
Agree
Agree
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
b)Guidancebasedonevidencefromtheirteachingpractice.
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
c)Professionalassistanceinusingevidenceandassessmentstoimprovetheirteaching
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
a)Additionaland/orspecialassistancetomeettheuniquechallengesoftheir
teachingassignment.
practice.
Page 3
Moderately
Strongly
Agree
Agree
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
professionaldevelopment.
b)Haspositivelyimpactedmyownprofessionalgrowth.
Section VI
13. Comments
Please share any comments or concerns here.
5
6
Thankyoufortakingthetimetocompletethissurvey.
PleaseclickontheSUBMITbuttonbelowtosendinyourresponsesandreceiveacodetodocumentthatthistaskhas
beencompleted.
Page 4
Page 1 of 1
1.
First Name *
2.
Last Name *
3.
Name of Your Support Provider *
4.
Clear Credential Candidate *
Mark only one oval.
General Education
Special Education
5.
Continuum of Teaching Practice Focus Elements *
Mark only one oval per row.
Emerging
Exploring
Applying
Integrating
Innovating
Element 1.4
Element 2.6
Element 3.5
Element 4.4
Element 5.2
Element 6.2
Powered by
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1pVRYRIQkiWHfAynmEBRkvzcBSRHIhugIo4ol1OlbA... 8/27/2014
Page 1 of 1
1.
First Name *
2.
Last Name *
3.
Name of Your Support Provider *
4.
Clear Credential Candidate *
Mark only one oval.
General Education
Special Education
5.
Continuum of Teaching Practice Focus Elements *
Mark only one oval per row.
Emerging
Exploring
Applying
Integrating
Innovating
Element 1.2
Element 2.4
Element 3.2
Element 4.1
Element 5.4
Element 6.3
Powered by
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1h_PzLaBwqDFx7g03nqm1_oa5iOyWGOnHiWtLWVcd... 8/27/2014
CommissiononTeacherCredentialing
BiennialReport2014
AcademicYears20122013and201314
Institution SacramentoCountyOfficeOfEducation
Datereportissubmitted September15,2014
Programdocumentedinthisreport MultipleandSingleSubjectClearInductionProgram
EducationSpecialistClearInductionProgram
NameofProgram SacramentoBTSAInductionConsortium
Pleaseidentifyalldeliveryoptions
Thisprogramisdeliveredthroughtraditionaland
throughwhichthisprogramisoffered
earlycompletionoptions.
(Traditional,Intern,Other)
Credentialawarded ClearGeneralEducation
ClearEducationSpecialist
Isthisprogramofferedatmorethanonesite?No
Ifyes,listallsitesatwhich
theprogramisoffered
ProgramContact
MaryEllenDill
Title
Director
Phone#
(916)2282236
mdill@scoe.net
EMail
IfthepreparerofthisreportisdifferentthantheProgramContact,pleasenotecontact
informationforthatpersonbelow:
Name
Dr.MelissaJ.Neuburger
Title
ProgramManager
Phone#
9162282575
mneuburger@scoe.net
SECTIONACREDENTIALPROGRAMSPECIFICINFORMATION
PARTIContextualInformation
ProgramInformation
TheSacramentoCountyOfficeofEducation(SCOE)BTSAConsortiumisaregionalprogramthat
partnerswithschooldistricts,charterorganizations,andprivateschoolstoclearteaching
credentials.SCOEadministersaCTCapprovedInductionProgramformultipleandsingle
subjectandEducationSpecialistClearCredentialcandidates.TheSacramentoInduction
Programisatwoyearprogramaimedatprovidingsupportandassistancetoteachersearlyin
theircareer.ParticipatingTeachers(PTs)intheprogramcanexpectfullsupportandthorough
andfrequentmonitoringoftheirprogressthroughclassroomobservations,writtenandverbal
feedback,andassistanceinimplementationoftheformativeassessmenttoolsusedinthestate
developedFormativeAssessmentforCaliforniaTeachers(FACT),coaching,mentoring,
curriculumsupport,professionalmaterials,modellessons,andcommunicationwithsite
administratorsregardingschoolsiteteacherneeds.
ChangessinceLastAccreditingActivity
Thestructureoftheprogramhasremainedthesamesincethelastaccreditingactivityhowever
agreaterfocusonsharingdatathroughouttheyearoccurredin201314.Basedonthefindings
ofthepriorBiennialReport,theprograminitiatedthefollowingchanges:
Programstaffmodeledandprovidedguidedpracticeinusingevidenceandcriteriafrom
theLevel2CompetencyStandardstoassistparticipantteachersinjudgingtheirpractice
andidentifyingareasofgrowth.
ProvidedgroupfeedbackinmeetingstoparticipantteachersIndividualInductionPlans
toassistsupportproviderswithdevelopingtheplansandmodelingconstructive
feedbackfortheprocess.
Respondedtotheprofessionaldevelopmentneedsofsupportprovidersandparticipant
teachersinsupportinginstructionforEnglishlearnersandspecialpopulations.
Streamlinedprocessesandprovidedcentrallylocated,electronicresourcesandtoolsto
assistsupportprovidersinefficientlyandeffectivelysupportingparticipantteachers.
ProgramSpecificCandidateInformation
Numbersofcandidatesandcompleters/graduatesfortwoyearsreported
Site(Ifmultiplesites)
DeliveryOption
20122013
201314
Numberof
Candidates
Numberof
Completers/
Graduates
Numberof
Candidates
Numberof
Completers/
Graduates
Traditional
446
233
458
220
EarlyCompletionOption
10
12
SECTIONACREDENTIALPROGRAMSPECIFICINFORMATION
PARTIICandidateAssessment/PerformanceandProgram
EffectivenessInformation
CandidateAssessmentsusedtoRecommendCandidatesforCredentials
a) Please identify and describe the tool(s) used to assess candidates, the data collection
processandthetypesofdatacollected
TheSacramentoBTSAInductionConsortiumutilizesseveralprimarycandidateassessmentsto
recommendacandidateforacredential.Theassessmentsandmeasuresfocusonthe
accomplishmentsandselfassessmentsofthecandidatesastheynavigatethroughtheprogram
andaredescribedinthetablebelow.Pleasenotethatin201314,participantdatamigratedto
anewdatabaseandsomeparticipantdetailsmaynotbeaccessibleforthe201213year.
CandidateAssessments
Key
Assessment
Tools
Assessment1.
Formative
Assessment
ofCalifornia
Teachers
(FACT)
Description
DataCollectionProcess
Standards
Assessed
Thisstatedevelopedformative
assessmenttooliscomprisedoffour
modulesandmeasuresparticipant
teachersassessmentof,contextfor,
inquiryinto,andsummaryofteaching
andlearningthroughselfreflection
andreviewofclassroomevidencein
concertwiththeinductionexperience
andwiththeguidanceoftheir
supportprovider.Thepurposeisto
deepenteachersunderstandingof
theInductionsProgramStandards
andtheCTSPs.Data includes
observations,studentwork,lesson
plans,andreflections.
Dataelementsarecollected
throughouteachyearofthe
programandarereviewedby
thesupportproviderfor
sufficiency.Portfolioswere
reviewedmidyearand
assessedinMayof2013and
2014.DatafortheMay2014
administrationisprovided.
CS9andPS
3,4
Thissurveywasadministered
toparticipantteachersinthe
Thissurveyofparticipantteachers
fallandagaininthespringfor
Assessment2. measuredchangesintheirperceived the201213and201314years.
competenciesonrepresentative
Participantteacherscompleted
CS9
Continuumof CTSPsasaresultsoftheBTSA
thesurveyundertheguidance
PS3,4
Teaching
program.Theratingscalesweretaken oftheirsupportproviders,
Practice
fromtheContinuumofTeaching
usingevidencetosubstantiate
Practice.
theirlevelofexpertiseineach
area.Answersweresubmitted
electronically.
SCOESeptember2014
CandidateAssessments(continued)
Key
Assessment
Tools
Assessment3.
Statewide
Surveyof
Participant
Teachersand
Support
Providers
Description
DataCollectionProcess
Standards
Assessed
Thismeasuredhowwellteachers
workedwiththeirsupportproviders
includingthequalityoftheir
relationship,frequencyofmeetings,
andfrequencyofclassroom
observations.Italsoassessedwhether
challengingconditionsexistedandhow
thosewereremediedbytheprogramor
thedistrictandalsomeasuredthe
inductionandformativeassessment
processes.LastlyitassessedBTSA
programpreparationandimpact.
Thissurveywas
administeredstatewidein
spring2013and2014viaa
confidential,electronic
survey.1
CS1,2,3,6,
9
PS16
Thisassessmentcollecteddataforthe
EducationSpecialistcredential;and
dataontheLevel2Competency
Standards
Datawascollectedthrougha
portfolioandsubmitted
electronicallyinspringof
CS7,9
2013and2014.Dataforthe PS1,4,5,6
May2014administrationis
provided.
Assessment4.
Education
Specialist
Portfolioand
Competencies
AdditionalDataandMeasuresusedtoAnalyzeProgramEffectivenessandInform
ProgrammaticDecisionMaking
b) Whatadditionalinformationaboutprogrameffectivenessiscollectedandanalyzedthat
informsprogrammaticdecisionmaking?
Inadditiontomeasuringcandidatecompetencies,theBTSAprogramalsoassessesadditional
informationtoevaluatetheprogramseffectiveness.Thetablebelowdescribesthevarietyof
programassessmentsusedduringthe201213and201314academicyearsthatinformed
programmaticdecisions.Datawascollectedfromparticipantteachers,supportproviders,and
programcoordinatorsandresultsweresharedoutthroughouttheyearandpostedtothe
BTSASacramento.orgwebsite.Althoughanumberofdisaggregatedanalyseswereconducted
foreachassessment,onlythemostsalientanalysesareprovidedinthisreport.
Afterrepeatedefforts,theprogramdirectorwasunabletoobtainthestatesurveydataforthe201314year
henceonlythe201213dataisprovidedinthisreport.
SCOESeptember2014
ProgramEffectiveness
Measuresof
Program
Description
Effectiveness
Thisassessmentcollectedinformation
aboutthetypeandlevelofsupport
Assessment1.
receivedbythesupportproviderduring
thatacademicyear.Itmeasuresmeeting
Participant
frequencyandthesupportproviders
Teacher
knowledgeandskillsinthecurriculum
Assessment
framework,usingstrategies,instructing
ofSupport
specialpopulations,providingresources,
Provider
reflectiveconversations,guidingILPs,
Effectiveness
CSTPs,analysisandfeedback,andusing
thedocumentsintheFACT.
Assessment2.
Midyear
Surveyof
Support
Providersand
Participant
Teachers
Thisassessmentcollectedinformation
abouttheBTSAexperienceincludingthe
availabilityofresources,opportunities,
andprofessionaldevelopmentprovided
bythedistrict.Italsoprovidesamidyear
snapshotofsupportreceivedand
provided.
Thissurveycollectedinformationfrom
BTSAdistrictadvisorsandcoordinatorsto
Assessment3.
ratethequalityoftheSCOEBTSAprogram
withregardtomonitoringprocesses,
BTSA
sufficiencyofresources,collaboration
Leadership
withdistricts,evaluationofprofessional
Survey
development,candidatepreparation,and
programobjectives.
Thismeasuredhowwellteachersworked
withtheirsupportprovidersincludingthe
Assessment4.
qualityoftheirrelationship,frequencyof
meetings,andfrequencyofclassroom
Statewide
observations.Italsoassessedwhether
Surveyof
challengingconditionsexistedandhow
Participant
thosewereremediedbytheprogramor
Teachersand
thedistrictandalsomeasuredthe
Support
inductionandformativeassessment
Providers
processes.LastlyitassessedBTSA
programpreparationandimpact.
DataCollectionProcess
Standards
Assessed
Thissurveywas
administeredinspring
2013andspring2014viaa
confidential,electronic
surveysenttoparticipant
teachers.
CS6,9
PS3,4
Thissurveywas
administeredinwinter
2013andwinter2014viaa
confidential,electronic
surveysendtoparticipant
teachersandsupport
providers.
CS3,6,9
PS16
Thissurveywas
administeredinspring
2014viaaconfidential,
electronicsurveysentto
programcoordinatorsand
advisorsatparticipating
schooldistricts.
CS1,3,6,
PS1,2
Thissurveywas
administeredstatewidein
spring2013and2014viaa
confidential,electronic
survey.2
CS1,2,3,6,
9
PS16
Afterrepeatedefforts,theprogramwasunabletoobtainthestatesurveydataforthe201314yearhenceonly
the201213datawillbereported.
SCOESeptember2014
CandidateAssessmentandProgramEffectivenessData
c) Includeaggregateddatafrom46assessmentsthatweredescribedin(a)and(b).
CandidateAssessment1.FormativeAssessmentofCaliforniaTeachers(FACT)
TheFACTiscomposedofanumberofrequirements,allofwhichmustbecompletedbytheend
ofthesecondyeartocompletetheBTSAprogram.Inthe201314year,241Year2participant
teachersendeavoredtocompletetheprogram.Thetablebelowshowsthatoverall,95%of
Year2candidatescompletedtheprogramandthatthekeyareasofinsufficiencyforthosethat
didnotcompletetheprogramwereinquiries,weeklyconversations,andendofyear
professionalinductionpresentation.
CredentialPathandAreaofIncompletionfor
Year2ParticipantTeachersin201314(percent
ofcandidates)
CompletedProgram
DidNotCompletetheProgram
97%
3%
General
Educ.
ECO
(N=11)
64%
6%
Educ.
Specialist
ECO
(N=1)
100%
0%
3%
2%
3%
2%
3%
2%
2%
36%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Educ.
General
Specialist Educ.
(N=52) (N=177)
94%
6%
Total
95%
5%
AreaofInsufficiency(Percentofcandidatesnotcompletingeacharea)
Inquiries
WeeklyConversations
ProfessionalInductionPresentation
ProfessionalDevelopmentHours
SelfAssessment
WeeklyConversations
ProfessionalDevelopmentCourses
0%
6%
2%
6%
2%
0%
2%
CandidateAssessment2.ContinuumofTeachingPractice
TheContinuumofTeachingPracticeassessmentmeasuresparticipantteachersselfreported
levelsofcompetencyacrosssixselectCSTPs.Year1andYear2teachersaremeasuredon
differentselectCSTPs.
Scoringrubric:
1=emerging
2=exploring
3=applying
4=integrating
5=innovating
Participation/completionrateforallparticipantteachergroupscombined:
In201213,atotalof346outof456teacherscompletedthesurveyinthefalland230
teacherscompletedthesurveyinthespring
In201314,atotalof372outof470teacherscompletedthesurveyinthefalland394
teacherscompletedthesurveyinthespring
SCOESeptember2014
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
2%
Thedatatablesforthisassessmentforboth201213and201314showthatonaverageYear1
regulareducationcandidateteachersbegantheprogramattheexploringlevelandmovedto
theapplyinglevelattheendoftheyear.Year2teachersbeganthesecondyearoftheprogram
attheapplyinglevelandapproachedtheintegratinglevelbytheendofthesecondyear.
Resultsforeducationspecialistcandidateteachersweresimilartothoseofregulareducation
candidateswiththeexceptionthateducationspecialistcandidatesratedtheircompetencyas
slightlyhigher,althoughdifferencesingrowthwerenotstatisticallydifferent.
SCOESeptember2014
CandidateAssessment3.StatewideSurveyofParticipantTeachersandSupportProviders
ParticipantTeacherResults
Atthetimeofthisreport,onlythe201313statesurveydatawasavailable.Inmanyinstances,
thestatesurveydatamirroredthedatacollectedlocallybytheBTSAprogramandanalyses
determinedthattheresultsweresimilar.Forthisreason,thisreportwillnotfocusonthe
entirelyofthestatesurveydatabutratherthoseareasinwhichsignificantfindingsinformed
candidatecompetency.Attotalof417participantteachersrespondedtothesurveyresulting
ina91%participationrate.Scoresarepresentedasoverallmeansforeacharea.Thetable
belowshowstherelativeimpactoftheprogramineachareainrankorderfrommostimpactful
toleastimpactful.
Scoringrubric:
1=noimpact
2=someimpact
3=moderateimpact
4=strongimpact
SCOESeptember2014
SCOESeptember2014
Thestatesurveyalsoaskedparticipantteacherstoidentifyamong15areaswheresupportwas
desired.Theareaswiththehighestpercentageofrespondentsindicatingitwasanareaof
desiresupportwereselectedforreview.Resultsfromtheparticipantteacher201213survey
disaggregatedbygrade,credentialtype,andyearinprogramshowsthatthemostdesiredarea
ofsupportisinthedevelopmentofarepertoireofteachingstrategiesfornearlyallparticipant
types.
Year
Program
Grade
Subgroup
Areawheresupportismostdesired:
%Yes
K5
b.Developingarepertoireofteachingstrategies
56.4%
68
b.Developingarepertoireofteachingstrategies
55.3%
912
b.Developingarepertoireofteachingstrategies
64.5%
Multisubject
b.Developingarepertoireofteachingstrategies
59.3%
SingleSubject
b.Developingarepertoireofteachingstrategies
59.7%
Ed.Specialist
m.UsingTechnologyasalearningtool
63.8%
1stYear
b.Developingarepertoireofteachingstrategies
64.4%
2ndYear
b.Developingarepertoireofteachingstrategies
55.6%
SupportProviderResults
Inthestatewidesurvey,supportprovidershadanopportunitytoindicatetheextenttowhich
theparticipantteachersgrewoverthecourseoftheprogram.Theareasassessedwere
comparabletothoseassessedoftheparticipantteachers.Meanscoreswerecalculatedfor
eacharea.The201213resultsofthe224supportprovidersthatrespondedareprovidedina
tablebelowbyrankorderfromgreatesttoleastamountofgrowth.Itisworthnotingherethat
themeasurementscaleonwhichparticipantteachersratedtheirgrowthwasdifferentthanthe
scaleusedbysupportproviders.Alsoprovidedisthenumberofsupportprovidersthatdidnot
knowwhethertheirparticipantteachersgrewintherespectiveareaornot.
Scoringrubric:
1=noobservablegrowth
2=littleobservablegrowth
3=someobservablegrowth
4=significantobservablegrowth
SCOESeptember2014
BTSAStateSurveyResultsforSupportProviders201213
Basedonyourworkwithparticipatingteachers,towhatextentdidthey
growintheirpracticeinthefollowingareasasaresultsoftheir
participationinBTSA?
Mean
SD
Number
thatdid
not
know
Developingarepertoireofteachingstrategies
3.62
0.56
Collaboratingproductivelywithcolleagues
3.60
0.61
Managingtheclassroomandfosteringasafeenvironment
3.58
0.62
Teachingtocontentstandards
3.57
0.56
Assessingstudentneedsanddifferentiatinginstruction
3.54
0.55
Usingassessmentdatatodesigninstruction
3.50
0.60
Ensuringaccesstothecurriculumforallstudents
3.49
0.56
Usingtechnologyasateachingtool
3.40
0.68
Developingarepertoireofassessmentstrategies
3.39
0.56
Collaboratingwithfamilies,includingcommunicatingassessmentresults
3.34
0.72
14
Usingtechnologyasalearningtool
3.32
0.74
10
Teachingstudentswithspecialneeds
3.29
0.72
25
Prioritizingtheprofessionalworkload
3.29
0.66
11
Minimizingbias,andusingculturallyresponsivepedagogy
3.26
0.69
13
TeachingEnglishlanguagelearners
3.19
0.80
17
CandidateAssessment4.EducationSpecialistPortfolioandCompetencies
Duringthe201314programyear,100%ofthe52Year2candidatesworkingontheirLevel2
competencieshadcompletedthelevel2competenciesspecifictothiscredential.Thethree
thathadnotcompletedtheentireBTSAprogrambyYear2werelackingcompletionofother
requirementsaswasnotedprior.
ProgramEffectivenessAssessment1.ParticipantTeacherAssessmentofSupportProvider
Effectiveness
Thisassessmentasksparticipantteacherstoratetheknowledgeandsupportoftheirsupport
providers.DataforYear1andYear2participantteachersanddataforcredentialtypewere
combinedtodeterminetheoverallmeasureofsupportreceived.
Scoringrubric:
1=weak
2=average
3=strong
Participation/completionrateforallparticipantteachergroupscombined:
In201213,atotalof388outof456teacherscompletedthesurvey
In201314,atotalof414outof470teacherscompletedthesurvey
SCOESeptember2014
10
Onaverage,scoresforbothyearsindicatethataveragetostrongsupportandknowledgewas
presentinthesupportproviders.Inthe2014year,astatisticallysignificantimprovementwas
made(brightgreenshading)intheunderstandingofprogramrequirementsbysupport
providerstoeffectivelyassistparticipantteachersintheircompletionoftheprogram.
Itwasalsonotedthatparticipantteacherswhodidnotmeetregularlywiththesupport
providersthroughouttheprogramratedtheirsupportprovidersasweaktoaverageinnearlyall
areasmeasuredforbothyearsreported.Theseresultsareillustratedinthefigurebelow.
SCOESeptember2014
11
ProgramEffectivenessAssessment2.MidyearSurveyofSupportProvidersandParticipant
Teachers
Themidyearsurveysmeasuredthefrequencyofprogramtooluse,theBTSAexperience,and
thesupportprovidedandreceivedbyparticipantteachersandsupportproviders.Resultsfor
eachsurveyarepresentedseparately.
SupportProviderSurveyResults
Scoringrubric:
1=donotagree
2=slightlyagree
3=moderatelyagree
4=stronglyagree
Participation/completionrateforsupportproviders:
In201213,atotalof199outof212supportproviderscompletedthesurvey
In201314,atotalof231outof243supportproviderscompletedthesurvey
Thetablebelowdepictsthepercentofsupportprovidersthatareusingtheprogramtools.
SCOESeptember2014
12
ThemidyearsurveyalsoaskedsupportprovidersabouttheirBTSAexperience.Thetablebelow
showstheaveragelevelofagreementtoeachstatementabouttheprogramandwhetherany
statisticallysignificantdifferences(*p=.05)werefoundbetweenthe201213and201314
programyears(brightgreenhighlight).
SCOESeptember2014
13
ParticipantTeacherSurveyResults
TheparticipantteachermidyearsurveyfocusedontheparticipantteachersBTSAexperience,
supporttheyreceivedfromtheirsupportproviders,andtheirperceivedincreasesin
competencyasaresultoftheprogram.Fortheseanalyses,dataforYear1andYear2
participantteachersandcredentialtypeswerecombined.
Scoringrubric:
1=donotagree
2=slightlyagree
3=moderatelyagree
4=stronglyagree
Participation/completionrateforallparticipantteachergroupscombined:
In201213,atotalof424outof456teacherscompletedthesurvey
In201314,atotalof448outof470teacherscompletedthesurvey
Thetablebelowshowstheaveragelevelofagreementtoeachstatementabouttheprogram
andwhetheranystatisticallysignificantdifferences(*p=.05)werefoundbetweenthe201213
and201314programyears(brightgreenhighlight).
SCOESeptember2014
14
ProgramEffectivenessAssessment3.BTSALeadershipSurvey
TheBTSALeadershipSurveywasadministeredinspringof2014togarnerfeedbackfrom
districtBTSAcoordinatorsandadvisorsaboutthesupportthatSCOEprovidestothemwith
regardtoprogramresourcesandcandidatepreparation.Thetablefollowingthescoringrubric
showstheaverageprogramratingforeachitemlisted.
SCOESeptember2014
15
Scoringrubric:
1=low
2through4(notdefinedbyatextdescriptor)
5=high
Participation/completionratefordistrictcoordinatorsandadvisorscombined:
In201314,atotalof16outof39districtcoordinatorsandadvisorscompletedthe
survey
BTSALeadershipSurveyResults:ProgramRatingsfor201314byCoordinators
andAdvisors
1.TheSCOEprogramhasaclear,researchedbasedvisionfortheinductionofnew
teacherswhichisarticulatedwithstakeholders.
2.TheSCOEprogramleadersandrelevantstakeholdersarehighlyinvolvedinthe
organization,governance,andcoordinationofthisprogram.
3.SCOEleadershavestrongsupportfromthedistrict.
4.SCOEhasawelldefinedandmonitoredprocessforensuringthatall
participatingteachershavemetallcredentialrequirements.
5.SCOEprovidessufficientfunding,personnel,andfacilityresourcesare
consistentlyallocatedtothisprogramtoenableeffectiveoperationandsupport.
6.TheresourceneedsoftheSCOEprogramareregularlyreviewed,evaluated,and
updated.
7.SCOEregularlyevaluatestheperformanceofprofessionaldevelopment
providersandseminarfacilitators.
8.TheactivitiesoftheSCOEprogramarealogicallysequencedextensionto
participatingteacherpreservicelearning.
9.ThereisclosecollaborationbetweentheSCOEprogramanddistrict
administration.
10.TherequirementsfortheparticipatingteachertocompletethisInduction
programareclear.
11.TheparticipatingteachersintheSCOEprogramhaveopportunitiestolearn
abouttheapplicationoftechnologytostudentlearning.
12.Participatingteachershaveresourcesandopportunitiesthatwillassistthemin
improvingtheirskillsindevelopingstrategiesforteachingEnglishlearners.
13.Participatingteachershaveresourcesandopportunitiesthatwillassistthemin
improvingtheirskillsteachingstudentsthathavedisabilities,areatrisk,orare
giftedandtalented.
14.Participatingteachershaveresourcesandopportunitiesintheareasof
differentiatinginstructiontomeetthevariousneedsofstudents.
15.Thereissufficientevidenceregardingcandidateprogressandperformanceto
guideadvisementandassistanceefforts.
16.TheSCOEprogramprovidescandidatessufficientopportunitiestodevelop
researchbasedstrategiesforimprovingstudentlearning.
17.TheSCOEprogrampreparescandidateswiththeproficienciesand
competenciestoeducateandeffectivelysupportallstudents.
SCOESeptember2014
16
Mean
Std.
Dev.
16
4.81
0.54
16
4.88
0.34
16
4.75
0.58
16
4.94
0.25
16
4.81
0.40
15
4.93
0.26
14
4.79
0.58
16
4.88
0.50
16
4.31
0.87
16
4.94
0.25
15
4.60
0.74
15
4.47
0.74
15
4.47
0.74
15
4.60
0.51
16
4.88
0.34
16
4.75
0.45
16
4.75
0.45
ProgramEffectivenessAssessment4.StatewideSurveyofParticipantTeachersandSupport
Providers
Asnotedprior,atthetimethisreportwaswritten,statesurveydatawasonlyavailableforthe
201213year.Datafromthestatesurveyisextensivehoweverthedataprovidedforthis
assessmentwillbelimitedtothemostsignificantfindingsfortheprogram,especiallysincevery
similardataiscollectedlocallyandanalyzedwithgreaterdetail.
ParticipantTeacherResults
Thestatewideparticipantteachersurveyaskedteachersabouttheinductionandformative
assessmentprocess.Thetablebelowshowstheresultsforthe201213participantteacher
surveywithregardtotheconnectionbetweentheirIIP/ILPandtheBTSAprogram.Atotalof
417participantteachersrespondedtothesurvey.
Scoringrubric:
1=noconnections
2=someconnections
3=moderateconnections
4=strongconnections
BTSAStateSurveyResultsforParticipantTeachers
201213
Howstrongweretheconnectionsbetweenthegoals
andresearchactivitiesyoudevelopedforyour
IndividualInductionPlan/IndividualLearningPlanand
thefollowing:
Preliminarycredentialpreparationgoalsandactivities
(teacherpreparation)
BTSAInductionprofessionaldevelopmentactivities
PercentofRespondents(N=417)
Strong
Connections
Moderate
Connections
Some
Connections
No
Connections
Mean
28.7%
44.5%
24.2%
2.4%
3.00
21.5%
41.4%
31.3%
5.3%
2.80
District/siteprofessionaldevelopmentactivities
25.1%
41.1%
27.0%
6.5%
2.85
WorkwithyourBTSAInductionSupportProvider
53.1%
31.6%
13.4%
1.4%
3.37
Districtformalteacherevaluationprocess
21.1%
36.1%
27.8%
14.6%
2.64
SupportProviderResults
Liketheparticipantteachers,supportprovidersrespondedtoasimilarstatesurvey.Atotalof
224supportprovidersrespondedtothestatewidesurveyofsupportproviders.
IncomparingthedemographicsofstatesupportproviderstotheSCOEsupportproviders,some
importantdifferenceswerenoted.Ascomparedtothestate,moreSCOEsupportproviders:
Carriedafulltimeteachingload(4%percentagepointsmore)
Hadadditionaldutiesthatimpactedtheirsupporttime(4%percentagepointsmore)
Supportedtwoormoreotherinterns/teachersinadditiontotheBTSAteachers(3%
percentagepointsmore)
Evenwithaslightlygreaterburdenuponthemhowever,SCOEsupportprovidersbelievedthat
theyprovidedthesamelevelofserviceastheotherprovidersinthestate.
SCOESeptember2014
17
Theresultsofthesupportprovidersurveythatarepresentedbelowfocusonidentifiedneeds
andareasofsupport,ratherthanarevieworcomparisonofallsurveyquestions.Inorderfor
supportproviderstosupportparticipantteachers,supportprovidersmustalsohavethe
appropriateknowledgeandskills.Thefigurebelowdepictsthepercentofsupportproviders
thathavenotreceivedprofessionaldevelopmentineachoftheareasnoted.Theareasare
rankedinorderfromlowtohighareasofneed.Theorangeandbluesectionshighlightareasin
whichnearly20%and30%ofsupportproviders,respectively,didnotreceiveprofessional
development.
The201213statewidesurveyalsoaskedsupportproviderstoidentifytheareasinwhichthey
desiredmoreprofessionaldevelopment.Thetablebelowdepictsthetopareascitedfor
professionaldevelopmentforfirstyearsupportprovidersandincludesdataforsecondyearand
moreexperiencedsupportproviders(3ormoreyears)aswell.
SCOESeptember2014
18
ProfessionalDevelopmentOpportunitiesDesired(MostPopular
ListedforYear1SupportProviders)
YearsasaSupport
Provider
Percentofsupportprovidersdesiringprofessionaldevelopmentin
eacharea.
Developingstrong,relevantandpowerfulIndividualInduction
Plan/IndividualLearningPlans(IIP/ILP)
Year1
SP
Year2
SP
Year
3+SP
77.0%
78.8%
55.8%
Buildingpersonalleadershipcapacity
73.8%
45.5%
42.5%
Developingstrong,relevantandpowerfulinquiryquestions
72.1%
72.7%
63.3%
Observingandgivingfeedback
72.1%
63.6%
53.3%
NetworkingwithotherSupportProviders
70.5%
69.7%
55.0%
Note:areasinpurplewerenotatopneedidentifiedbyYear2+supportproviders,data
issimpleprovidedtolendcontinuity
PARTIIIAnalysesandDiscussionofCandidateandProgramData
Describewhattheanalysesofthedatademonstrateaboutyourprogramrelativeto:a)
candidatecompetence;andb)programeffectiveness.
Overall,resultsfromthecandidateandprogramassessmentsindicatethattheBTSAprogramis
effectivelymeetingitsgoalsandthatitprovidesappropriatesupporttoparticipantteachersto
enablethemtocompletetheprogramrequirementsandcleartheircredential.
CandidateAssessment1.FormativeAssessmentofCaliforniaTeachers(FACT)
InreviewingthedatafromtheFACT,itwasevidentthatnearlyallYear2participantteachers
completetheprogramwithintwoyears.Forthosethatdidnotcompletetheprogrambythe
endofthesecondyear,thegreatestbarrierswerecompletionoftheinquirycycles,weekly
conversations,andendofyearinductionpresentation.Giventhattheinquirycyclesarethe
forefrontoftheotherrequirements,candidateswhodonotsuccessfullycompletetheseon
time,quicklyfallbehindintheprogram.Thoseteachersutilizingtheearlycompletionoption
weremostchallengedwithmeetingtheinquirycyclesandendofyearinductionpresentation
requirements,suggestingthatworkingwithasupportproviderismoresuccessfulthan
attemptingtocompletetheprogramontheirown.
CandidateAssessment2.ContinuumofTeachingPractice
ResultsfortheContinuumofTeachingPracticeassessmentshowedthatYear1participants
reportedonaverageonelevelofgrowthfromthefalltothespringwhileYear2participants
reportedgrowinghalfalevelontheCSTPsasaresultoftheprogram.Initialcompetencylevels
wereslightlylowerforthe201213participantteachersthanforthe201314participant
teacherssuggestingthatthepoolofteachersinthesecondprogramyearhadslightlymore
initialexperiencethancandidatesfromtheprioryear.Resultsalsoindicatethatthe201314
Year1teachers(bothgeneraleducationandeducationspecialists)werestrongestintheareaof
employingclassroomroutineswhileYear2teachersindicatethattheirstrengthoccurredinthe
SCOESeptember2014
19
realmofcollaboration.Year1teacherweaknesseslayintheareasofdifferentiatinginstruction
tomeettheneedsofspecialpopulations.BytheendofYear2however,scoresinmostofthe
lowerscoringareastendedtoleveloutthusrelativeweaknesseswerelesssubstantial.
Worthnotingisthatalthoughcandidatestendedtooverreporttheirlevelsofcompetency,
theyrecognizedthatmuchprofessionalgrowthoccurredthroughouttheprogram.Asa
measureofteachercompetency,thisassessmenttoolnotonlyinformstheteacherabouttheir
practiceandtheuseofevidence,butalsoengendersadeeperunderstandingofthestandards
fortheteachingprofessionthatguidestheirgrowthasteachers.
CandidateAssessment3.StateSurvey
Thestatesurveyprovidedconfirmationoftheresultsfoundinthelocalprogramassessments.
Teacherscitedthattheprogramelementsofobservingexperiencedteachers,receiving
coachingandfeedback,anddevelopingarepertoireofstrategiestouseintheclassroomhad
thebiggestimpactontheirdevelopmentasateacher.Theleastimpactfulelementsofthe
programwereinprioritizingtheprofessionalworkloadandinusingtechnologyforteachingand
learning.Notsurprising,participantteacherscitedthattheareasofprofessionaldevelopment
theydesiredmostweredevelopingarepertoireofteachingstrategies(allteachers)andusing
technologyasalearningtool(educationspecialists).
Selfreportedgrowthofteachersintheareaofdevelopingarepertoireofstrategieswasalso
confirmedbythestatewidesurveydataasthiswastheareasupportprovidersindicatedthat
teachersgrewthemost.Supportprovidersreportedthatteachergrewleastintheareaof
teachingEnglishlearnersandinminimizingbiasandusingculturallyresponsivepedagogy.
TheseresultsalignwiththedatafromtheContinuumofTeachingPracticeandtheself
identificationofprofessionaldevelopmentneedsbyparticipantteachers.
CandidateAssessment4.EducationSpecialistPortfolioandCompetencies
Basedonthefewcandidateswhoserequirementswerenotcompleted,itcanbededucedthat
completionoftheadditionalportfolioandcompetencieswasnotthesolereasonthat
candidatesdidnotcompletetheprogram.Thisareawouldnotbeconsideredasanarea
identifiedforimprovementoverthecourseofthenextcycle.
ProgramAssessment1.ParticipantTeacherAssessmentofSupportProviderEffectiveness
Participantteachersratedtheirsupportprovidersknowledgeandskillsasbeingaverageto
strongacrossthe17areasofsupport.Ratingsofsupportprovidersunderstandingofthe
requirementsneededtocompletetheprogramandclearthecredentialshowedsignificant
improvementfromspring2013tospring2014.Supportprovidersgreateststrengthlayin
creatingatrustingrelationshipwiththeparticipantteacherandtheareaneedinggreatest
improvementwasinsharingstrategiesandresourcesforteachingEnglishlearners.Not
surprising,havingregularmeetingsbetweensupportprovidersandtheirparticipantteachers
wasfoundtobeessentialtoprogramsupport.
SCOESeptember2014
20
ProgramAssessment2.MidyearSurveyofParticipantTeachersandSupportProviders
Themajorfindingofthemidyearsurveyofsupportproviderswasthatinnearlyallcases,
supportproviderswereconsistentlyutilizingtheprogramtoolswiththeirparticipantteachers.
Ininstanceswherethisdidnotoccur,supportproviderscitedthatunexpectedabsences(e.g.
maternityleave)preventedthefulluseofthetoolorcitedthataplanwasinprogress.Areasin
whichsupportproviderscouldimprovewere:theprovisionofincreasedopportunitiesfor
participantteacherstoworkwithspecialeducationteachers;assistancetomeettheunique
challengesoftheparticipantteachersteachingassignments;andprovidingguidanceto
participantteachersbasedonevidenceoftheirteachingpractices.
Resultsfromtheparticipantteachermidyearsurveyshowedthatparticipantteacherswere
pleasedwiththeirBTSAexperienceandthesupporttheyreceivedfromtheirsupportproviders.
TheyalsocitedthatparticipationintheBTSAprogramincreasedtheirteachingskillsand
classroomenvironment,especiallyintheuseofassessmentdataanddifferentiatinginstruction.
SkillareasidentifiedforimprovementfromthisassessmentareteachingandsupportingEnglish
learnersandalsocommunicatingwithfamiliesaboutstudentsprogress.
ProgramAssessment3.BTSALeadershipSurvey
ResultsfromtheBTSAleadershipsurveyindicatedthattheSCOEprogramandstaffeffectively
servedtheneedsofprogramcoordinatorsandadvisorsduring201314.Resultsfromthespring
2014surveyshowhighratingsforallareasofprogramsupport,particularlyintheclarityofthe
requirementstocompletetheinductionprogramandhavingawelldefinedmonitoring
process.Participantsindicated(throughopenendedquestions)thattheprogramcouldbe
improvedbyincreasinginvolvementofsiteanddistrictadministratorsintheprogramandby
havingasummertrainingfornewdistrictcoordinatorstohelpthemlearntheirnewrole.
ProgramAssessment4.StateSurvey
Datafromtheparticipantteacherstatewidesurveyindicatedthattheconnectionsbetweenthe
goalsandresearchactivitiesteachersdevelopedfortheirIIP/ILPwerestrongestintheareasof
workingwiththeirBTSAInductionsupportproviderandalsointhepreliminarycredential
preparationgoalsandactivities.Theweakestconnectionwasfoundinthedistrictformal
teacherevaluationprocess,suggestingagainthatacloserrelationshipbetweentheprogram
andthedistrictwouldbebeneficial.
Withregardtothestatewidesupportprovidersurvey,oneofthemostprofoundfindingswas
thatalthoughmostprovidershadtherequisiteskillstosupporttheirteachersinmostareas,
supportprovidersalsoneededprofessionaldevelopmentinsomeofthesameareasthat
participantteacherscited.Aswashighlightedintheorangeshadedareaonthechart,nearly
20%ofsupportprovidershadnotreceivedprofessionaldevelopmentintheareasof:
WorkingeffectivelywithEnglishlearners
Workingeffectivelywithspecialneedsstudents,
Guidedgroupanalysisofparticipantteacherorsupportproviderartifacts
Grouptrainingonprofessionallearningcommunities
SCOESeptember2014
21
Areasinwhich30%ofsupportproviderssaidtheyhadnotreceivedprofessionaldevelopment
werehighlightedintheshadedblueareaonthechartandinclude:
Usingtechnology
CoachingfromBTSAprogramdirectororcoordinator
Analysisofsurveydata
Peercoachingwithothersupportproviders
Writtenfeedback
Thestatesurveyalsoaskedproviderstoidentifyareasofprofessionaldevelopmentthatwould
enhancetheirsupportproviderknowledgeandskills.Thelargestareasinwhichprofessional
developmenthadbeendesiredwereallfocusedonprovidingbettersupporttotheirparticipant
teachers,includingopportunitiesforobservationandfeedback,collaboration,andsupporting
theILP/IIPandinquiryprocesses.Ifprovidersaretoeffectivelysupporttheirparticipant
teachersinthesesameareas,thentheyneedaccesstoprofessionaldevelopmentaswell.
PARTIVUseofAssessmentResultstoImproveCandidateandProgramPerformance
12pages
Inmanycases,thedatafromthevariousassessmentsledtothesameconclusions.Asummary
oftheproposedprogrammaticchangesbaseduponthefindingsoftheassessmenttoolsare
describedinthetablesthatfollow.
DataSource
PlanofActionorProposedChangesMade
Applicable
Programor
Common
Standard(s)
CS9
FACT
Candidatesseekingtoenrollintheearlycompletion
PS3,4
optionwillonlybeallowedtodosoafterthorough
discussionwiththecandidatesregardingthedifficult
natureofcompletingtheprogramrequirementswithout
thebenefitofasupportprovider.Earlycandidate
completionoptionsmustalsobeapprovedbythe
candidatesschooldistrict.WewillensuretheECO
processwhichhasbeendevelopedisclearlydefinedtoall
stakeholders.
Continuumof
Thedepthandcomplexityoftheprogramactivitieswill
CS9
TeachingPractice bedifferentiatedtobetteraddressthegreaterinitial
PS3,4
knowledgeandexperienceofYear1participantteachers.
Inaddition,theCSTPsandtheContinuumofTeaching
Practicewillbedirectlyreviewedwithparticipant
teachersatbenchmarkmeetingstoensuretheirfull
understandingofthestandardstobetteranchortheir
selfreportedlevelsofcompetency.
SCOESeptember2014
22
DataSource
PlanofActionorProposedChangesMade
Aftersharingresultsofthesurveytoconstituentgroups,
itbecameapparentthatsupportprovidersdesired
structuredfeedbackaboutthesupporttheyprovidedand
desiredmoreopportunitiesforcollaboration.Infallof
2013supportprovidersandparticipantteachersbegan
developingafeedbackworksheetcontainingcontent
areasforfeedback,methodofdeliveryandfrequencyof
administration.Thefinalfeedbackformwillbe
completedforuseduringOctober2014benchmarks.
Furthermoreworkshopsagendasweredesignedto
supportcollaborationtimein201314andwillcontinue
todosoinsubsequentyears.
Participant
Itwasevidentthatregularlyscheduledmeetings
Teacher
betweenparticipantteachersandsupportproviderswas
Assessmentof
essentialtoprogramsuccess.Tothisend,theprogram
SupportProvider advisorsandcoordinatorswillbeexpectedtofollowup
Effectiveness
withthesupportprovidersattheirsitetoremedyany
schedulingissuesthatmayarise.Coordinatorswill
report,discuss,andresolvetheirmonitoringofregularly
scheduledmeetingsandrecordthisintheBTSA
database.
MidyearSurvey
Toaddresstheneedforgreaterresourcestosupport
ofParticipant
Englishlearnersandtoincreaseresourcesand
Teachersand
opportunitiestoworkwithspecialneedsstudents,fall
Support
2013meetingtimewasdedicatedtocreatinga
Providers,
centralizedlistofresources(MyBTSAResources)that
StatewideSurvey waspublishedtotheMyBTSAwebsite.Acontinuedgoal
ofParticipant
forthe201415yearwillbetoidentifysourcesand
Teachersand
provideguidanceandexpertiseforprofessional
Support
developmentforbothsupportprovidersandparticipant
Providers,and
teachers.Tobetterassessprogramsupportforstudents
Assessmentof
intheseareas,theFACTwasredesignedforthe201415
SupportProvider yeartoincorporateelementsforEnglishlearnersand
Effectiveness
specialpopulations.
StatewideSurvey
ofParticipant
Teachersand
SupportProviders
SCOESeptember2014
23
Applicable
Programor
Common
Standard(s)
CS1,2,3,6,9
PS16
CS6,9
PS3,4
CS1,2,3,6,9
PS16
DataSource
PlanofActionorProposedChangesMade
BTSALeadership
Survey
CS1,3,6,
Toincreasetheinvolvementofsiteanddistrict
PS1,2
administratorsintheprogram,additionalactivitieswill
occurinthe201415year.Theseactivitiesinclude:a
surveytodeterminehowinformationfromtheprogram
canbestsupporttheirprogramteachersneedsaswellas
waysinwhichtheywouldvaluefurtherinvolvementin
theprogram;additionalinvitationstoparticipateinBTSA
meetings;andmorefrequentcommunicationwith
districtandsiteadministratorsaboutprogramresultsand
activitiesbasedonsurveyresultfindings.
SCOESeptember2014
24
Applicable
Programor
Common
Standard(s)
The
Multiple/Single
Subject/Ed.
Specialist
Clear;
Preliminary
and
Clear
Administrative
Services;
and
Multiple/Single
Subject
Internship
credential
programs
within
the
SCOE
School
of
Education
have
developed
thorough
evaluation
systems.
Along
with
data
gathered,
analyzed,
and
utilized
at
the
program
level,
the
School
of
Education
has
developed
a
comprehensive
Unit
Assessment
Plan
that
looks
across
all
SCOE
programs.
It
is
the
intent
of
the
School
of
Education
to
demonstrate
that
as
a
unit,
data
are
used
to
judge
candidate
competence
and
program
effectives.
SCOEs
School
of
Education
has
identified
the
following
measures
to
be
aggregated
at
the
unit
level.
Candidate
Competence
Data
Tool
Candidate
Self-Assessments
using
CSTP
or
Leadership
Standards
End-of-Program
Completer
Data
Program
Effectiveness
Data
Tool
Mid-Year/Mid-Program
Survey
Workshop/Course
Seminar
Feedback
Evaluation
of
Instructor/SP
Effectiveness
Proposed Changes
Common Standard
The
School
of
Education
will
convene
periodic
Director
meetings
and
use
data
to:
Review
how
each
program
measures
candidate
competence
Develop
a
common
calendar
of
events
and
a
plan
to
share
resources,
i.e.
personnel,
materials,
etc.
Monitor
the
efficacy
of
instructional
personnel
and
to
ensure
that
feedback
is
provided
in
a
timely
and
supportive
way
Use
the
analysis
of
data
for
program
improvement
actions
Bring
the
new
Internship
programs
online
for
2015-16
The
School
of
Education
will
periodically
convene
Advisory
Council
to:
Monitor
actions
taken,
the
basis
of
those
actions
and
how/when
the
results
will
be
reviewed
next
Assist
with
program
design,
changes,
and
direction
Ensure
that
resources
are
identified
and
shared
among
districts
and
the
county
and
that
site
and
district
administrators
are
familiar
and
supportive
of
county
credential
programs
CS
2
CS
4
CS
5
CS
6
CS
8
CS
9
CS
1
CS
2
CS
3
CS
1-Leadership,
CS
2-Unit
&
Program
Assessment
&
Evaluation,
CS
3-Resources,
CS
4-Faculty
&
Instructional
Personnel,
CS
5-Admission,
CS
6-Advice
&
Assistance,
CS
7-Field
Experience,
CS
8-District
Employed
Supervisors,
CS
9-Candidate
Assessment
Verification
and
Transmittal
Approval.
The
electronic
signature
of
Unit
Leader
below
provides
verification
that
s/he
has
read
all
program
reports
and
provided
an
Institutional
Summary
(Section
B).
Further,
the
electronic
signature
provides
approval
to
transmit
the
Biennial
Report
to
the
Commission
on
Teacher
Credentialing.
4
Name/Title
Email
Date
Phone
Cohorts
Sp
Pt1
Pt2
Goal:
Informparticipantswiththeinformationthey
needfortheiruniquecohort.
Task:
Checkin
ProgramUpdates
Documentoverview
Networking
(therewillberoomchartstoguidetheagendafor
thissession)
LessonDesign:
Startrightat4:00
Gooveragendafoundonchart
Credentialing101
Goal:
HarryWong'sFirstDaysofSchool GraduateLevelworktomeettheProgram
InductionStandards
Task:
Howtousethedocumentsintheirclassroomto
assesstheirteachingabilitiesusingtheCSTP'swith
theCommonCoreStandardsastheirguideasto
howtoteachcurriculum.
LessonDesign:
Documentoverviewanddiscussion(broughtby
participantsdependingontimeofyearPacing
Guide)
CompleteworkinMybtsa(labwork)
Questions/Concerns
4:00415(15minutes)
Ifpeoplearelate,doesnot
Impacttheworkshops...latebirds
signinwithDawn....Thoselate
birdsareourproblemtodeal
with.
Inallsessions,groupseating
arrangements...thereareseveral
tochoosefrom....:possiblegrade
level,subjectmatter,(public,
private,independentstudy,
charterarrangements),etc.
4:204:50(30minutes)
Agenda
Topic
Time
20142015BenchmarkTimeline
5:306:00(30minutes)
4:555:25(30minutes)
SOLVEDProblemSolving
Strategy
TeachLikeaChampion
(EL,Equity,SpecialPopulations)
50Strategies
(EL,Equity,SpecialPopulations)
Goal:
Practicewhatwepreach:Talkwiththem,notat
them
Tasks:
ShareactivitiesfromthebooksTeachLikea
Championand50Strategies
LessonDesign:Modelalesson:
Usethespecificactivityhandoutsasguidesand
modelalessonusingthesuggestedactivities.
GroupDiscussion
Goal:
Practicewhatwepreach:Talkwiththem,notat
them
Tasks:
TeachtheSOLVEDStrategyusingauthenticissues
fromthefield.
LessonDesign:ModelaLesson
DemonstratehowtousetheSOLVEDstrategywith
thegroup.
PairdiscussionusingSOLVEDdocumentasthe
thirdpointintheconversation
(skillbuildinginreflectiveconversation)
GroupDiscussion
20142015BenchmarkTimeline
Participating Teacher
Handbook
2013/14
www.btsasacramento.org
Find us on Facebook!
www.facebook.com/btsasacramento
Contents
Page
3
4
12
17
What is FACT?
18
20
26
31
Online Investigation
Formal Observation of an
experienced colleague
Work with your SP, BTSA Coordinator or SCOE BTSA Program Directors to review options
for PD. Your SP will approve the PD hours when:
Inquiry Cycle(s): Equity (yr1) and two inquiries focused on your assessed needs (yr2)
Self Assessments for Pedagogy, Equity, English Learners and Special Populations
Reflective Summary of Teaching Practice
Online Investigation
Formal Observation of an
experienced colleague
Work with your SP, BTSA Coordinator or SCOE BTSA Program Directors to review
options for PD. Your SP will approve the PD hours when:
Inquiry Cycle(s): Equity (yr1) and two inquiries focused on your assessed
needs (yr2)
Self Assessments for Pedagogy, Equity, English Learners and Special Populations
Reflective Summary of Teaching Practice
End-of-Year
PIP
MAY
Benchmark
Seminar 4
MARCH
Benchmark Seminar 3
JANUARY
Benchmark Seminar 2
NOVEMBER
Benchmark Seminar 1
OCTOBER
Orientation
YEAR 1 PT TASKS
YEAR 2 PT TASKS
Induction Advisement
Credential Roles and Completion Responsibilities
Induction Advisement
Credential Roles and Completion Responsibilities
Initial Observation
o KWO Chart
o Post Observation Reflection
Continuum of Teaching Practice
o Lesson Plan
o Observation
o Summative Assessment of Student Work
Continuum of Teaching Practice
o Lesson Plan
o Observation
o Summative Assessment of Student Work
Continuum of Teaching Practice
Statewide Survey
You begin the year by focusing on your students, your classroom, your site, administration, and all the
support services available to you. This process will help you be knowledgeable about your students and how
you can address their individual learning needs. You will also plan and teach a lesson that your SP will
informally observe. Feedback from this lesson will help you determine your level of practice related to the
CSTPs.
FACT templates for collecting information are available on MyBTSA or you may want to substitute your
own data/information when appropriate. You may also want to use photos or diagrams, or information and
directories that you may find in your site information materials.
Information to gather for this Benchmark includes:
A class profile (Look at the student enrollment information that may be provided through a
district information system and ask your students for information)
The layout of your instructional environment and the site areas you use for teaching (make a
diagram or take photos)
School and District Information/Resources (check the directories in your site binder for
administrative, curriculum, technology, special education, and other services)
Home/School Communication Log (you may want to design your own system for logging
conversations/emails)
Site Orientation Checklist (so that you have all the information you need to get started on a great
teaching year)
Informal Observation:
Fill out the K-W-O Chart (What I Know, What I Want to know, What I want you to Observe) and share it
with your SP.
Plan a lesson and schedule an observation with your SP. As you plan, consider the learning needs of all
students. What is the actual EVIDENCE your SP will observe to show the quality of your teaching? Your SP
will do an objective observation that will help you gain valuable insights about your teaching and identify
methods you may want to change or strengthen. Complete a Post-Observation Reflection.
When you have finished all of the above you will review the Continuum of Teaching Practice.
Although you will review all six standards and elements, you will focus your attention on
Standard 2, (Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning).
Evaluate yourself on each of theses elements of the California Standards for the Teaching Profession
(CSTP). Highlight or underline appropriate language for each of the seven elements as a self-evaluation of
your current level of teaching. For each page you will want to cite and describe the evidence that
demonstrates each CSTP.
Statewide Survey: You will receive your login information (Consent Form ID) and you must complete
the required statewide survey by the assigned due date which will be sometime in May. This will be an
online survey that reflects your first year experience with induction.
10
11
12
This first benchmark asks you to revisit your context for teaching (your students, your instructional
environment, your site, administration, and all the support services available to you). This process will help you
learn about your students and how you can address their individual learning needs.
FACT templates are available on MyBTSA or you can substitute your own data/information when appropriate.
You may also want to use photos or diagrams, or information and directories that you may find in your site
information materials.
Information to gather for this Benchmark includes:
A class profile (Look at the student enrollment information that may be provided through a district
information system and ask your students for information)
The layout of your instructional environment and the site areas you use for teaching (make a
diagram or take photos)
School and District Information/Resources (check the directories in your site binder for
administrative, curriculum, technology, special education and other services)
Home/School Communication Log (you may want to design your own system for logging
conversations/emails)
Site Orientation Checklist (so that you have all the information you need to get started on a great
teaching year)
Continuum of Teaching Practice
You will also review your Continuum of Teaching Practice to help you determine your level of practice related to
the CSTPs. Evaluate yourself on each of the focus elements of the California Standards for the Teaching
Profession. Highlight or underline a column for each of the six focus elements (see page 17) as a self-evaluation
of your current level of teaching. For each page you will want to cite and describe the evidence that
demonstrates each CSTP.
Self Assessments
You will also complete three self-assessments: Pedagogy (the art and science of teaching); Special
Populations (serving the full range of students: students identified for special education, students with
disabilities, advanced learners, and students with a combination of special instructional needs); and
English Learners (differentiating instruction based on language proficiency). You are asked to assess
yourself and systematically focus on developing as a professional educator. You will do three initial
reflections that should be thoughtful and professionally written.
13
14
15
16
Year 2
17
What is FACT?
The
System
18
Plan
What%do%I%know%about%
my%students%and%my%
teaching%context?
Apply
Teach
How%will%I%apply%what%
Ive%learned%to%enhance%
student%learning?
How%am%I%implementing%
instruction%and%
addressing%
student%needs?
Reflect
What%have%I%learned%about%
my%teaching%and%my%
students?
19
STEP ONE
Collecting Information - With your support provider, gather information on the following:
Class Profile/Ed Specialist Caseload
Instructional Environment
School and District Information/Resources
Home/School Communication
Site/Assignment Orientation Checklist
STEP TWO
Contextualizing and Extending CSDC Information - With a support provider, discuss the prompts
on the Conversation Guide: CSDC
20
21
Inquiry
Purpose: An inquiry-based system guides and informs participating teachers about their own professional growth for the
purpose of improving teaching. Participating teachers gather information, collaborate, and/or observe a colleague, develop
an action plan, implement that action plan, and look for ways to apply what is being learned to a lesson series. The results
are used to guide professional development and future practice.
STEP ONE
Designing the IIP
Determining the Focus of the Inquiry & Developing the Action Plan
Individual Induction Plan
Determining what I need to know and be able to do
Review evidence collected prior to the Inquiry, identify the focus question for the Inquiry, and begin
developing an action plan. Actions taken over the course of 2-3 months should be continually recorded.
Examples of research can include:
Talk with colleagues
Attend workshops/courses
Observe professional colleagues
Analyze data such as, student work
Read research related to focus question
Research a question on the Internet
STEP TWO
Preparing a Lesson
Series
Essential Components for Instruction Use this to ensure that all lesson components have
been considered when designing the lesson series.
Entry Level Assessment: Use information from an assessment to identify focus students, plan
lesson series, and make appropriate adaptations to instruction.
Selecting Focus Students Identify three students who represent the range of students in the
classroom or on the caseload: 1) English Learners 2) Special Populations and 3) Choice
STEP THREE
Lesson Observation
Observation
Collecting supportive evidence of implementation
Pre-conference
Review Essential Components for Instruction, lesson plan, and Focus Student Selection. Use
a copy of the seating chart to identify focus students.
Determine where the lesson to be observed fits within the lesson series.
Review Context for Teaching for additional resources.
Observation: SPs notes will be part of the PTs portfolio.
Post Observation: Review evidence and record how the changes implemented impacted classroom instruction.
STEP FOUR
Examining Student
Work
At the conclusion of the lesson series, administer a summative assessment and PT/SP analyze
the work of class, especially the three focus students, in order to document how effective
students were in meeting learning goals.
STEP FIVE
Assessing Professional
Growth
Review the evidence collected and record conclusions on the IIP as a final reflection.
Using the Continuum of Teaching Practice as a guide, teachers assess practice in relation to
the CSTPs.
22
Inquiry Documents
23
Self Assessment
Purpose: Teachers knowledge, skills, and practices develop throughout their professional careers. The nature of teaching
requires continuous growth in order to engage and challenge increasingly diverse students. Teachers are never finished as
professional learners, no matter how extensive or excellent their formal education and preparation. If teachers expertise,
capabilities, and accomplishments are to be enriched over time, they must become reflective practitioners who actively seek
to strengthen and augment their professional skills, knowledge, and perspectives throughout their careers.
24
Reflective Conversations
Assessing professional growth over time
STEP
ONE
Review the Self-Assessments and the Continuum of Teaching Practice. Consider the evidence collected
during the Context for Teaching and Learning and the Inquiry into Teaching and Learning and use the
Culminating Questions and Reflection Guide to navigate through a reflective conversation.
Written Reflection
Assessing professional growth over time
STEP
TWO
Written reflection
Using the Culminating Questions and Reflections Guide, identify teaching practices that had the greatest
impact on student learning and the progress you made toward your professional growth goals. Meet with
your support provider to:
Discuss your personal insights about your professional growth
Surface additional insights from your collaborative conversation
Record reflections on the Reflective Summary of Teaching Practice.
STEP
THREE
25
APPENDIX: GLOSSARY
Academic Content Standards - Standards
designed to encourage the highest achievement
of every student, by defining the knowledge,
concepts, and skills that students should acquire at
each grade level.
Academic Performance Index (API) - A
numeric index (or scale) that ranges from a low of
200 to a high of 1000; measures the academic
performance and growth of schools; a school's score
on the API is an indicator of a school's performance
level. The statewide API performance target for all
schools is 800. A school's growth is measured by how
well it is moving toward or past that goal. A school's
API Base is subtracted from its API Growth to
determine how much the school improved in a year.
Action Research - A systematic form of inquiry that
is self-reflective, critical, and undertaken by the
participants of the inquiry [McCutcheon, G. &
Jung, B. (1990)]; a process in which participating
teachers examine their teaching practice using the
techniques of research. By using research
procedures, teachers learn to resolve teaching
challenges.
Adequate Yearly Performance (AYP) - A
statewide accountability system mandated by the No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001 that requires each state
to ensure that all schools and districts make Adequate
Yearly Progress.
Advancement Via Individual Determination
(AVID) A college preparatory program for students
who are o f t e n e c o n o m i c a l l y d i s a d v a n t a g e d
a n d underachieving; AVID places academically
average students in advanced classes; levels the
playing field for minority, rural, low-income, and
other students without a college-going tradition in
their families; and targets students in the academic
middle who have the desire to go to college and
the willingness to work hard.
Assessment of Teaching and Learning - A FACT
process designed for participating teachers to
discern strengths and areas for growth that will be
used in subsequent inquiries of teaching practice;
and to identify resources and types of support needed
to develop and implement their Individual
Induction Plan. During this module, participating
teachers consider their prior knowledge and skills
from teacher preparation.
Beginning
Teacher
Support
&
Assessment (BTSA) - A state-funded induction
program, cosponsored by the California Department
of Education (CDE) and the Commission on Teacher
Credentialing (CTC) designed to support the
professional development of newly-credentialed
beginning teachers and help them fulfill the
requirements for the California Clear Multiple
26
- Colleges and
27
28
29
Appendix: ACRONYMS
API
SAIT
AVID
SARC
AYP
SP
Support Provider
BTSA
CDE
CELDT
CFASST
CSTP
CTC
Commission on Teacher
Credentialing
CTP
DAIT
EL
English Learners
FACT
GATE
IEP
IHE
IIP
IPS
MOU
Memorandum of Understanding
PT
Participating Teacher
PTRA
RTI2
TPA
TPE
UA
Universal Access
30
uick Sheet
2013-2014
Purpose
o
o
Weekly Conversations
Log 40 hours on MyBTSA Can include both faceto-face and email meetings with your SP. Up to 12
hours of grade/department level meeting time can
count provided that a copy of the grade/department
notes are shared with your Support Provider.
o Professional Development
Select PD tied to your professional growth goals
and and log them into MyBTSA . Work with your
SP, BTSA Coordinator or SCOE BTSA Program
Directors to review options for PD
PLEASE NOTE:
You must post a record of ALL your BTSA
work to your MyBTSA electronic file located at
www.btsasacramento.org
CSUS Units (Optional)
Six (6) units per year can be purchased
Register online through your MyBTSA homepage after
March 15, 2013
Deadline for registration is JUNE 13, 2014
NOTICE: For complete information regarding the
BTSA
PROGRAM COMPLETION
BTSA STAFF
Darby Williams
Program Director
916-228-2664
dwilliams@scoe.net
Dawn McCarron
Program Analyst
916-228-2496
dmccarron@scoe.net
Kris Silbaugh
Administrative Assistant
916-228-3301
ksilbaugh@scoe.net
FAX 916-228-3921
uick Sheet
BTSA
Beginning Teacher Support & Assessment
Purpose
Inquiry Cycle(s)
Self Assessments
Reflective Summary of Teaching Practice
www.btsasacramento.org
BTSA STAFF
Darby Williams
Program Director
916-228-2664
dwilliams@scoe.net
Dawn McCarron
Program Analyst
916-228-2496
dmccarron@scoe.net
Kris Silbaugh
Administrative Assistant
916-228-3301
ksilbaugh@scoe.net
PTevaluationofSPeffectiveness(completebyMay28,2015)
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2015_PT_Asmnt_SP_Effect
BTSALeadershipSurvey(completeby)
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2015_Leadership_Survey
MidyearPTSurvey(completebyJanuary30,2015)
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2015_PT_Midyear_Survey
MidyearSPSurvey(completebyJanuary30,2015)
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2015_SP_Midyear_Survey
FACT
Formative Assessment for California Teachers
USERS GUIDE
Foreword
Formative Assessment for California Teachers (FACT) is a performance-based, formative assessment and support
system developed collaboratively by practitioners and researchers throughout the state, under the direction of the
California Department of Education and the Commission on Teacher Credentialing. The FACT System is the
second generation of Californias long-standing formative assessment system, the California Formative
Assessment and Support System for Teachers (CFASST). The FACT System showcases assessment processes
originally developed in California by California educators working with both Educational Testing Services and
West Ed research agencies.
The development of FACT is an example of teachers, universities, research agencies, and state agencies
working together to produce useful, high-quality tools to support the professional development of teachers. The
contributions of these agencies and dedicated California educators are greatly appreciated.
Wendy Baron
Suzanne Riley
Reproduction of this document and related materials for use by California BTSA Induction Programs is
permissible.
Table of Contents
THE MODULES:
Context for Teaching and Learning ................................................................................ 14
Assessment of Teaching and Learning .......................................................................... 28
Inquiry into Teaching and Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Summary of Teaching and Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Reflections on Teaching and Learning (Assessment Toolbox) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
R E S O U R C E S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
SOURCES OF EVIDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
The F A C T System
Formative Assessment for California Teachers
Teaching involves a search for meaning in the world. Teaching is a life project, a calling, a vocation that is an
organizing center of all other activities. Teaching is past and future, as well as present; it is background as well as
foreground; it is depth as well as surface. Teaching is pain and humor, joy and anger, dreariness and epiphany.
Teaching is world building; it is architecture and design; it is purpose and moral enterprise. Teaching is a way of being
in the world that breaks through the boundaries of the traditional job and in the process redefines all life and teaching
itself.
--William Ayers
What is FACT?
The FACT System guides teachers in their growth as professionals, focuses on meeting the learning needs of all
students, and promotes reflective practitioners. Participating teachers engage in an ongoing learning process that
follows a cycle of plan, teach, reflect, and apply. With the assistance of a support provider, participating teachers
identify areas of strength and growth, and complete an Individual Induction Plan (IIP) for their research and professional
development that is focused on the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) and the Induction
Program Standards (IPS).
The FACT System is composed of four modules (see chart on page 7). The Assessment of Teaching and
Learning module bridges teacher preparation with the induction experience as teachers reflect on what they
know and determine the current level of their teaching practice. This assessment builds a foundation for future
growth related to teaching standards.
While focusing on their teaching practice in the first module, participating teachers also address the Context for
Teaching and Learning module where they gather information about their class, and the organization and
resources of the school, district, and community. This contextual analysis guides and informs participating teachers
as they engage in subsequent FACT activities.
In the Inquiry into Teaching and Learning module, participating teachers assess their practice against a set of
specific criteria, and select an area for an in-depth inquiry. This investigation follows an action research model,
allowing participating teachers to research questions pertinent to their classroom needs. The results of the inquiry
guide the participating teachers professional development as they explore the impact of their instruction on student
achievement.
The final module, Summary of Teaching and Learning, is an end-of-year reflection. Participating teachers review the
results of the inquiries, consider the data collected, identify best teaching practices, and assess the impact of formative
assessment on their teaching practice.
Reflective Conversations
In each module, participating teachers are asked to step back from their practice and thoughtfully
examine what they do, how they do it, and how this affects student learning. The FACT System
provides frequent opportunities for participating teachers to reflect, capture current thinking, and
consider the implications for their future practice.
Documents
Class Profile
Student Services Profile
#
A-1
A-1.1
Instructional Environment
A-2
A-3
Home/School Communication
A-4
A-5
Community Information
A-6
B-1
K-W-O Chart
B-2
B-3
Post-Observation Reflection
B-4
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
D-1
Self-Assessment Pedagogy
Self-Assessment Universal Access: Equity for all
Students
Self-Assessment Universal Access: Equity for all
Students Teaching English Learners
Self-Assessment Universal Access: Equity for all
Students Teaching Special Populations
E-2.5
E-2.6
E-2.6a
E-2.6b
E-2.7
E-3.1
E-3.5
E-3.6
E-3.6a
E-3.6b
Clear Education Specialist Candidates: This key () symbolizes the places in the system
aligned or modified to meet the needs of Clear Education Specialist Candidates.
STEP ONE
I. Collecting Information - With your support provider, gather information about the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
STEP TWO
I. Contextualizing and Extending Information - With a support provider, discuss the prompts on the
Conversation Guide for Class/Caseload, School, District, Community (E-3.1) located in Reflections on
Teaching and Learning.
A. Collecting - Review information gathered during Step 1 (A-1 through A-6).
B. Contextualizing - Discuss how this information might impact instructional practice.
C. Extending - Deepen thinking and understanding.
STEP THREE
I. Contextualizing and Extending Induction Information - With a support provider, discuss the prompts on
the Conversation Guides for each Induction Program Standard (E-3.5, E-3.6, E-3.6a, E-3.6b) located
with the Reflections on Teaching and Learning tools.
A. Collecting - Review information gathered during Step 1 (A-1 through A-6).
B. Contextualizing - Discuss how this information might impact classroom practice.
C. Extending - Deepen thinking and understanding.
Date of
Birth
(K-3 only)
Identifiers*
English
Learner
Special Needs
(Check if applicable)
(Check if
applicable)
Comments
Academic strengths, social strengths,
notes about parents, and any other
factors that may impact the planning and
delivery of instruction and/or student
learning
* Possible Identifiers: 504 Plan - Legal in-class accommodations; GATE - Gifted & Talented Education;
MED- Medical Condition; MI. Ed. - Migrant Education; RSP - Resource Specialist
Program; Ret - Retained; S/L - Speech & Language; SP - Special Education w/IEP;
SST - Student Study Team interventions; FY Foster Youth; H Homeless; HR
High Risk
Emergency
Contact
Condition
Support
(Resources, Assistive Technologies)
Next IEP
Meeting
Date
Classroom
Accommodations/
Modifications
Behavioral
Support
Strategies
Case Carrier
Classroom
Accommodations
SST Date to
Reconvene
Interventions to Implement
Students who are Advanced Learners and/or Gifted and Talented (GATE):
Name
Academic Strengths
Social
Strengths
Designated
GATE
1
2
Reading
Writing
Composite
Score
Reclassified
Listening
Speaking
Migrant
Program
Years of ELD
Instruction
Translator
needed
Languages
spoken in
the home1
Name
Students
Primary
1
Language
Identifiers
below)
Annual
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
CST
CAHSEE
CMA
CAPA
Speech/Language
OT
PT
APE
Transition
Other_______
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Annual
Triennial
Social
Strengths
Academic Strengths
Designated
GATE
1
2
Reading
Writing
Composite
Score
Classroom
Accommodations
Reclassified
Listening
Speaking
Migrant
Program
Years of ELD
Instruction
Translator
needed
Students
Primary
1
Language
Name
Languages
spoken in the
home1
Instructional Environment Rationale (e.g., student safety considerations; strategic placement of English learners, students
who qualify for special education services, advanced learners, and those with other special needs; communication and
collaboration among students):
My Site Administrator(s):
Explore and attach a Calendar of School Events
My school is a (check those that apply):
Blue Ribbon School
Non-public school
Private School
Other:
Intervention
AVID
Character Counts
Conflict Resolution
Department Grouping/PLC
Bus/Recess
Teaching Teams
Library Schedule
Other
Languages spoken:
School Enrollment:
# of Languages of students:
Ethnicities represented:
Location
Phone/email
Other
Other
Instructional Resources
Information
Contact Person
Phone #
Location
Instructional Materials /
Standards
Classroom Supplies
Technology
Library
English Learner
Other:
Student Data Information
Information
Contact Person
Phone #
Location
Information
Contact Person
Phone #
Counselor
CPR Certified School Staff
Emergency Coordinator
Healthy Start Coordinator
Nurse/Health Aide
Crisis Counselor
Speech/Language
School/District Psychologist
SELPA
Special Education Staff
Student Study Team /
504 Plans
Transition Services
Social Worker/Mental Health
Services
Other:
Location
Contact Name
Contact Information
(e.g., email address, phone number)
Contact Date/Comments
School:
DIRECTIONS: A professional educators knowledge of the policies and procedures at their site/assignment is important.
This list of discussion topics will help you understand your local teaching context. In a meeting with your administrator or
designee, discuss each of these items and obtain your administrators signature. If your school/district provides this
information in another format, you may attach it.
Staff Information
Staff Roster
Staff Responsibilities
Intervention Programs
(Conflict Resolution, Bullying, Multi-tiered system
of support)
Emergency Procedures
School Information
School Policies
Homework Policy
Attendance Procedures
Hours to be on Campus
Assessment of
Teaching and Learning
STEP ONE
STEP TWO
I.
Consider information already gathered during the Context for Teaching and Learning Module
Inform your support provider of the specific focus area(s) for the lesson observation by
completing the K-W-O Chart (B-2)
Support providers will gather evidence on observable CSTP & Induction Program Standards
(B-3)
Post-Observation Discussion
A. With your support provider, review and discuss the evidence gathered during the
observation, then record insights about your teaching practice on the Post-Observation
Reflection (B-4).
STEP THREE
Assessment Completion
Purpose: Determining the level of practice related to the standard
I.
II.
Review and mark the Induction Program Standards Self-Assessment (E-2.5, E-2.6,
E-2.6a, E-2.6b) located in the Reflections on Teaching and Learning (Assessment
Toolbox).
Clear Education Specialist candidates will also reflect and self-assess on the
professional development options (E-2.7).
A. Read and discuss each Induction Program Standard (E-2.5, E-2.6, E-2.6a, E-2.6b).
B. Review evidence collected (Context for Teaching and Learning Module, observations,
student work, and Conversation Guides). Record your strengths and challenges related
to the application of your skills and abilities for each standard.
C. You will complete an initial and final Self-Assessment for each Induction Program
Standard (E-2.5, E-2.6, E-2.6a, E-2.6b).
STEP FOUR
Closure Conversation
Purpose: Focusing on key insights about practice
I. Reflection
A. With your support provider, discuss insights gained from the Assessment of Teaching
and Learning Module, using the Continuum of Teaching Practice and the Induction
Program Standards Self-Assessment.
B. Identify areas of focus for further exploration.
C. A teachers growth is developmental; therefore self-assessment will be revisited
throughout the system. As teachers self-assess, they notice growth including a deeper
understanding of the work in response to new teaching context, responsibilities, or
challenges.
Date:
Determine a specific area of focus for the support providers observation. Reflect on current practice and
indicate:
1.
2.
3.
K-W-O Chart
What I know about my instructional practice and student outcomes
For example: I create an environment of respect; Students understand the routines and procedures in my class;
I promote communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity, etc.
Date:
CSTP 2:
Creating and Maintaining
Effective Environments for
Student Learning
CSTP 3:
Understanding and Organizing
Subject Matter for Student Learning
CSTP 5:
Assessing Students for Learning
CSTP 6:
Developing as a Professional
Educator
Date:
Insights:
STEP ONE
With your support provider, review the evidence collected prior to the inquiry. Based on the evidence,
determine the focus question for the inquiry, taking into consideration your school/district goals and
priorities. The following steps are designed to assist in the development of the focus question:
I. Individual Induction Plan (IIP, C-1) Cells 1-4
A.
Review the Assessment of Teaching and Learning and Context for Teaching and Learning
Modules.
B.
Cell 1: Determine the area(s) for focus.
C.
Utilize data collected during the Context for Teaching and Learning and the Assessment of
Teaching and Learning Modules to assist in determining an area of focus (i.e.,
assessment, classroom management, equity, and diversity, etc.)
Cell 2: Develop a focus question for this inquiry.
Participating teachers may use the reflective questions in the CSTP, located after each
element, to identify an open-ended focus question that leads to an in-depth study of
teaching practice
How do I develop and use tools and guidelines that help all students assess their
work and monitor their learning goals?
What links might there be between students behavior and the ways in which I
have been addressing their learning?
CSTP 2.3:
Establishing and maintaining learning environments that are physically, intellectually, and
emotionally safe
CSTP 1.4:
Using a variety of instructional strategies, resources, and technologies to meet students
diverse learning needs
IPS 6 Universal Access Equity for all Students:
Systematically examine personal belief systems and expectations and how they impact
student learning and behavior.
STEP TWO
During Step Two, participating teachers work with support providers to begin developing their action
plan. This plan will document new learning and classroom application. While completing IIP (C-1)
cells 5-8, participating teachers document actions taken throughout the inquiry process.
I. IIP (C-1) Cells 5-8
A. Cell 5: Date of research
Record dates for each action taken to support the focus question
B. Cell 6: Research
Describe resources such as:
Talk with colleague(s)
Observe professional colleague(s)
Read research related to the focus question
Attend workshops/courses
Analyze student work
Explore Internet resources
Observation by a support provider
C. Cell 7: Application
Describe how new knowledge was implemented in the instructional setting
D.
IIP (C-1) cells 5-8 are updated throughout the inquiry process, while IIP cells 9 and 10 serve
as the culminating reflection.
During this step in the inquiry process, participating teachers identify three focus students and document
how instruction is differentiated and student achievement is monitored, throughout the inquiry process.
I.
Assessment of learning
Essential questions
II.
III.
Clear Education Specialist candidates select focus students based on their caseload.
A. Based on data collected from the entry-level assessment, identify three focus students
representing the range of learners in your instructional environment. The students
selected should include:
English Learners
Special Populations
Choice (a student who completes the range of abilities in the classroom)
B. Plan a lesson series, making appropriate instructional adaptations.
IV.
STEP FOUR
Observation
Collecting evidence
During this step in the inquiry process, support providers observe their participating teachers. Using
the Essential Components for Instruction (C-2), teachers design a lesson series that meets the
needs of all students. Differentiation of instruction for focus students should be documented and
student achievement data collected.
I.
Pre-conference
A. Review the completed Essential Components for Instruction (C-2) and corresponding
lesson plan (Lesson Plan Observation Template, C-5, or district aligned lesson plan).
B. Review information recorded on the Focus Student Selection (C-4).
(Use a copy of your seating chart to identify focus students)
C. Determine which lesson in the series will be observed.
D. Fill in the top portion of the Inquiry Observation Record (C-6) based on your focus
questions, selected CSTP, and identified content and common core standards.
E. Review the Context for Teaching and Learning Module for additional resources.
II.
Observation
A. Support providers gather evidence from one lesson within the series, using the Inquiry
Observation Record (C-6) or an alternative observation tool that includes areas for
collection of evidence related to:
Focus question(s)
Selected CSTP (incorporating the Induction Program Standards)
Content and Common Core Standards
Three focus students
III.
Post-Observation Conversation
A. Support providers and participating teachers review evidence collected, including the
:Inquiry Observation Record (C-6).
B. Review student work from the observed lesson. Participating teachers describe how
students performed on Analysis of Student Work (C-7).
C. Consider the 4 Cs (communication, creativity, collaboration, and critical thinking) during
the post-observation conversation.
D. Continue reviewing evidence to record how the implemented changes impacted classroom
instruction and student achievement. Documentation of research and application made in
the classroom is ongoing as reflected on the Individual Induction Plan (Cells 5-8).
STEP FIVE
Summative Assessment
Analyzing student work to determine next steps for instruction
At the conclusion of the lesson series, a summative assessment is given to all students.
Participating teachers, with support providers, analyze the work of the three focus students and the
whole class, in order to determine student performance levels.
I. Summative Assessment (C-8) Part I
A. Review the summative assessment.
B. Sort student responses into levels of performance.
FACT System 2014 Page 42
STEP SIX
During this step in the inquiry process, participating teachers and support providers review the
evidence collected and return to IIP cells 9 and 10 for a final reflection. Using the Continuum of
Teaching Practice as a guide, teachers assess their practice in relation to the CSTP and the
Induction Program Standards. During the induction experience, all standards will ultimately be
addressed.
I. Review and mark the Continuum of Teaching Practice and Induction Program Standards
A. Review and discuss the value of assessing teaching practice using the established criteria in
the California Standards for the Teaching Profession.
B. Using the evidence gathered, during the Inquiry into Teaching and Learning Module, read
the standard elements focused on for the inquiry question and consider application of the
evidence gathered.
List evidence, in the space provided, under the applicable element from instructional
practice and student performance in the first column
Use evidence to determine a starting point for assessing practice
Assess level of current practice, by highlighting or underlining, based on the evidence
Date the self-assessment
C. Subsequent self-assessments can be dated and highlighted in a different color to show growth
over time.
D. Revisit appropriate Self-Assessment of Induction Program Standards (E-2.5, E-2.6, E-2.6a, E2.6b) and describe your teaching strengths and challenges based on the evidence.
Clear Education Specialist candidates will also reflect and self-assess on the
professional development options (E-2.7).
II. Reflection IIP (C-1) Cell 9
A. List specific evidence that impacted:
Instructional/classroom practices
Student achievement
B. Share your learning about:
Student development
Instructional practice
Academic content
Yourself as a teacher
III.
IIP#______
Date:____________
Support
Provider:
District:
School:
Teaching
Assignment:
3.
PLAN
1.
Content
Credential Area of Emphasis:
Area:
FOCUS OF THE INQUIRY: Determining what I need to know and be able to do
Based on data (i.e., self-assessment on the Continuum of Teaching
2. Develop a focus question for this inquiry.
Practice, observations, student work samples, etc.) collected during the
Context for Teaching and Learning and Assessment of Teaching and
Learning modules, determine the focus area(s).
4.
ACTION PLAN: Examining research related to my focus question and applying new learning in my instructional setting
6. Research: Describe resources used
7. Application: Implementation of new
8. Measurable Results: Describe the impact
(e.g., talked to colleague. researched online. other)
knowledge
on student achievement
PLAN/TEACH
5. Date of
research
At the end of the inquiry, what changes would you expect in student achievement
as a result of your action research?
REFLECTION/APPLICATION
9b. Share your learning about student development, instructional practice, academic content, and/or yourself as a teacher.
REFLECT
9a. As a result of the inquiry process, what was the impact on instructional strategies and student achievement? (list specific evidence)
10. Describe how you will apply new learning to other areas of future practice.
APPLY
The Induction Program Standards (Pedagogy, Universal Access: Equity for All Students, Universal Access: Teaching English Learners, and
Universal Access: Teaching Special Populations) are embedded throughout the formative assessment system.
FACT System 2014 Page 44
Clear Education Specialist candidates in non-traditional educational settings consider the areas of need as identified in
the Individual Transition Plan or the Individual Family Service Plan.
Participating Teacher:
Support Provider:
Content Area:
Beginning Date:
Grade/Period:
Ending Date:
COMMON CORE AND OR CONTENT STANDARDS
What Common Core State Standards and/or Content Standards will be addressed in this lesson series?
(This may be addressed through Assessment Claims, Target-Standards Bundle language, SBAC)
What are the ELD Standards that are integrated into this lesson series?
Describe some of the ways (e.g., teacher tools, self-assessment, peer assessment, etc.) you will elicit evidence throughout
the lesson series. Include where and how you will take opportunities to interpret evidence and act on evidence in order to
adjust instruction.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING
Describe the summative assessment that will be used to measure the skills necessary for mastery of the standard(s).
Select the item type(s) that will be used to assess student learning:
Selected Response
Constructed Response
Performance Task
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
Developing essential questions helps students transfer knowledge and learning within disciplines. Essential questions should
be:
Timeless or important
Universal in nature
Elemental or foundation inquiries within a discipline
Vital or necessary to personal understanding
Develop an essential question(s) that will guide the focus of your unit.
RELEVANCE
How will students apply the learning to real world situations?
How will other subjects or subject matter be integrated in this lesson series?
TECHNOLOGY
During this lesson series, how will students interact with technology to enhance and/or publish their understanding of the
content?
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
What materials will you consider for this lesson series?
How will you incorporate your Action Research (IIP) into this lesson series?
In what ways might the learning goals be communicated to the students and families?
How might you collaborate with resource specialists, paraeducators, and other personnel?
Based on structures for supporting English language acquisition, how might you support English learners?
Date:
Partial Understanding
Adequate Understanding
Thorough Understanding
Date:
Before instruction begins, what do the assessment results tell you about what your students understand and are able
to do? For students to achieve at each of these levels, what do you think are some possible factors to consider?
Minimal Understanding:
Partial Understanding:
Adequate Understanding:
Thorough Understanding:
2.
How will you provide interventions for students categorized as minimal or partial? What additional support may be
needed?
3.
How will you differentiate for the students categorized as adequate or thorough?
Clear Education Specialist candidates select focus students based on their caseload.
In the boxes below, record first (last initial, if necessary) names of selected students.
Include
Partial Understanding
AT GRADE LEVEL
OR IEP
EXPECTANCIES
Adequate
Understanding
ABOVE GRADE
LEVEL OR IEP
EXPECTANCIES
Thorough
Understanding
Focus Student 1:
English Learner
Alternate:
Focus Student 2:
Special Populations
Alternate:
Focus Student 3:
Choice
Alternate:
Describe instructional or behavioral considerations for each focus student. Additional considerations may include work
habits, social skills, social emotional/behavior and practical abilities, academic abilities, personal interests, etc.
Focus Student 1:
English Learner
What support/resources (e.g., EL coach, translation materials, primary language textbook, etc.) do you anticipate this
student will need? What differentiation strategies will you employ? What might be indicators of success?
Focus Student 2:
Special Populations
What support/resources (e.g., EL coach, translation materials, primary language textbook, etc.) do you anticipate this
student will need? What differentiation strategies will you employ? What might be indicators of success?
Focus Student 3:
Choice
What support/resources (e.g., EL coach, translation materials, primary language textbook, etc.) do you anticipate this
student will need? What differentiation strategies will you employ? What might be indicators of success?
Grade:
Date(s)
Grade Level Standard(s)
Common Core Standard or Content Standard addressed:
Time:
Communication:
Collaboration:
Critical Thinking:
Integrated ELD
Designated ELD
Differentiation
Consider IEPs, 504s, English Language Proficiencies (ELP), learning styles,
English learners
Special Populations
General Population
Date:
Support Provider:
Common Core or
Content Standard(s):
Focus Question(s):
What evidence could your support provider collect in relation to your focus question?
Time Observation
Begins:
Time Observation
Ends:
Observation Data:
st
21 Century Learning
(Consider the following for post-observation discussion with the participating teacher)
Communication
Creativity
Collaboration
Critical Thinking
The Induction Program Standards (Pedagogy, Universal Access: Equity for All Students, Universal Access: Teaching English
Learners, and Universal Access: Teaching Special Populations) are embedded with observations of the California Standards
for the Teaching Profession (CSTP).
Student participation:
Behavior:
Differentiation:
Student participation:
Behavior:
Differentiation:
Student participation:
Behavior:
Differentiation:
Date:
Partial Understanding
Adequate Understanding
Thorough Understanding
ALD 1
ALD 2
ALD 3
ALD 3
Date:
Review the Common Core State Standards or Content Standards identified on the Essential Components for
Instruction document and describe the learning outcomes achieved.
5.
Reflect on the Essential Components for Instructions document. For students scoring in the categories of minimal
or partial understanding, describe how the following may have impacted their learning:
3.
a.
b.
c.
Technology Integration
d.
Other:
4.
Given the summative assessment interpretation, what additional interventions might you provide for students who
did not meet the learning targets?
5.
What needs might you anticipate for the students who exceeded the learning targets?
Summary of
Teaching and Learning
STEP ONE
I. Reflective conversations
A. Gather and review the information from your experiences in formative assessment during
induction.
Clear Education Specialist candidates will also reflect and self-assess on the
professional development options (E-2.7).
Consider the evidence collected during the Context for Teaching and Learning,
Assessment of Teaching and Learning, and Inquiry into Teaching and Learning
Modules
B. Use the Culminating Questions and Reflections Guide (D-1) to navigate through a reflective
conversation.
Written Reflection
Assessing professional growth over time
STEP TWO
I. Written reflection
A. Using the Culminating Questions and Reflections Guide (D-1) identify teaching
practices that had the greatest impact on student learning and the progress you made
toward your professional growth goals.
B. Meet with your support provider to:
STEP THREE
Choose from the questions below to guide a culminating conversation with your support provider.
During the conversation, refer to evidence that demonstrates your growth as a professional educator.
Yourself
Your students
Evidence
Reflect on evidence collected during the three modules (Context for Teaching and
Learning, Assessment of Teaching and Learning, and Inquiry into Teaching and
Learning) in the following areas:
- Focus students
- State-adopted Content and Common Core Standards
- Instructional strategies
- Assessments
Highlight the evidence that best illustrates a change/improvement in your teaching.
Consider:
- Depth of Knowledge Levels
- 21st Century Learning
- Integration of Technology
- English Language Development
Looking Ahead
What will you continue to investigate or focus on as you move into your next years of
teaching?
How will you continue to be a consumer of research; i.e., current issues and trends,
journal articles, and evidence based on research in the field?
3.
Reflections
on
Teaching and Learning
(Assessment Toolbox)
Guide, monitor, and assess the progress of their practice toward professional goals
and standards
Available
at
http://ca-btsainduction.org/
Name:
Self-Assessment
Pedagogy (E-2.5)
Directions: With your support provider review and discuss the standards below referencing any information gained through Conversation Guides.
Participating teachers grow and improve in their ability to reflect upon and apply the California Standards for the Teaching Profession and the specific pedagogical skills for subject matter instruction
beyond what was demonstrated for the preliminary credential. They utilize the adopted academic content standards and performance levels for students, curriculum frameworks, and instructional
materials in the context of their teaching assignment.
Participating teachers use and
Describe your strengths and challenges related to assessment.
Reflection Planning Prompts:
interpret student assessment data
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Assessment Data:
from multiple measures for entry
- Discuss how you use
level, progress monitoring, and
multiple measures to
summative assessments of student
monitor students progress
academic performance to inform
toward meeting adopted
Final Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
instruction. They plan and
academic content
differentiate instruction using multistandards?
tiered interventions as appropriate
Evidence:
based on the assessed individual,
academic language and literacy, and
diverse learning needs of the full
Describe your strengths and challenges related to implementing interventions.
Multi-tiered Interventions:
range of learners (e.g. struggling
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
readers, students with special needs,
How do you use multi-tiered
English learners, speakers of noninterventions to meet the
dominant varieties of English, and
diverse learning needs of
advanced learners).
your full range of learners?
Evidence:
Learning Environment:
- In what ways do you create
Evidence:
Final Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Technology:
- How do you use technology
-
Evidence:
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Class Profile; School and District Information/Resources; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work;
Classroom Observations School Calendar; Standards for Student Behavior/Classroom Rules/Discipline Plan; Student Strengths (See Class Profile); Assessment and Technology tools; Instructional
Materials; Pacing Guide/Curriculum Map/Scope and Sequence; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work; Classroom Observations
Name:
Self-Assessment
Inclusive Environments:
- In what ways do you
support students from all
ethnic, racial, socioeconomic, cultural,
academic, and linguistic
backgrounds; gender,
gender identity, and
sexual orientation?
Evidence:
Teaching Practice:
- What culturally
responsive teaching
practices do you use to
overcome the effects of
bias?
Evidence:
Final Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Communication:
- In what ways do you
communicate with
students, colleagues,
resource personnel and
families to provide
equitable access to the
state-adopted academic
content standards?
Evidence:
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Class Profile; School and District Information/Resources; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work;
Classroom Observations
Name:
Self-Assessment
Universal Access: Equity for all Students Teaching English Learners (E-2.6a)
Directions: With your support provider review and discuss the standards below referencing any information gained through Conversation Guides.
To ensure academic achievement and language
proficiency for English learners, participating teachers
adhere to legal and ethical obligations for teaching English
learners including the identification, reclassification and
monitoring processes. Participating teachers implement
district policies regarding primary language support
services for students. Participating teachers plan
instruction for English learners based on the students
levels of proficiency and literacy in English and primary
language as assessed by multiple measures such as state
language proficiency assessments, state standards
assessment and local assessments.
Language Supports:
How do you use
measures of English
language proficiency
to make instructional
decisions?
Evidence:
ELD Instruction:
- How do you
support your
students
development of
academic
language and
English language
development?
Evidence:
Classroom Environment
- How do you
manage and
organize your
classroom for first
and secondlanguage
learners?
Evidence:
Participating teachers instruct English learners using
adopted
standards-aligned
instructional
materials.
Participating teachers differentiate instruction based upon
their students primary language and proficiency levels in
English considering the students culture, level of
acculturation, and prior schooling.
Differentiated Instruction:
- In what ways do
you
differentiate
instruction based
on your students
culture, levels of
acculturation,
proficiency in
English, and/or
prior schooling?
Evidence:
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Class Profile; School and District Information/Resources; Ongoing Parent/Student Communication; Student Work;
Classroom Observations
Name:
Self-Assessment
Universal Access: Equity for all Students Teaching Special Populations (E-2.6b)
Directions: With your support provider review and discuss the standards below referencing any information gained through Conversation Guides.
To ensure academic achievement for
special populations, participating teachers
adhere to their legal and ethical
obligations relative to the full range of
special populations (students identified for
special
education,
students
with
disabilities, advanced learners and
students with a combination of special
instructional
needs)
including
the
identification and referral process of
students for special services. Participating
teachers appropriately identify factors that
could affect the determination of an
English
learners
language/learning
disability. Participating teachers implement
district policies regarding support services
for special populations. Participating
teachers communicate and collaborate
with special services personnel to ensure
that instruction and support services for
special
populations
are
provided
according to the students assessed levels
of academic, behavioral and social needs.
Based on assessed student needs,
participating teachers provide
differentiated instruction, including
accommodations and modifications based
on assessed student needs. Participating
teachers recognize students strengths
and needs, use positive behavioral
support strategies, and employ a
strengths-based approach to meet the
needs of all students, including the full
range of special populations.
Participating teachers instruct special
populations using adopted standardsaligned instructional materials and
resources (e.g., varying curriculum depth
and complexity, managing paraeducators, using assistive and other
technologies).
Collaboration:
-
Evidence:
Modifications/
Accommodations:
-
Evidence:
Evidence:
Describe your strengths and challenges related to using behavioral support strategies.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Class Profile, SST Artifacts; Assessment Results; Sample from Instructional Materials Used; School and District
Information/Resources that meet the needs of special populations; Student Work; Classroom Observations
Name:
Self-Assessment
Clear Education Specialist Candidates (E-2.7)
Directions: With your support provider review and discuss the standards below referencing any information gained through Conversation Guides.
Pedagogy
The Education Specialist Individual Induction Plan includes
the advanced and applied pedagogy to expand the holders
expertise in delivering services.
The participant shall
demonstrate awareness of current research, issues and
trends, evidence based practices in the field re: social,
academic and behavioral intervention, and current legal
issues. Education Specialists utilize advanced level datadriven instruction.
Participants reflect on their preliminary
teacher preparation and design a specific emphasis for their
Induction based on their authorization and their employment
assignment.
Reflection Planning
Prompts:
Collaboration,
Consultation, and
Co-teaching in the
Least Restrictive
Environment:
-
How do you
support student
integration into
the Least
Restrictive
Environment?
Describe your strengths and challenges related to collaboration, consultation, and co-teaching in the least
restrictive environment.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Evidence:
Professional
Development:
-
How do you
select
appropriate
professional
development to
expand your
skills?
Evidence:
Current Research
and Trends:
-
Describe your strengths and challenges related to integrating current research into your practice.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
How do you
integrate
current
research into
your practice?
Final Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Evidence:
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Collaborative Log, Lesson Plan, Individual Induction Plan, Assessment Results; Student Work; Classroom Observation
Participating Teacher:
Grade Level/Subject:
Extending
Contextualizing
Instructional
Environment
Home/School
Communication
Site/Assignment
Orientation Checklist
Community Information
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
School Calendar
Parent/Student
Communication
Instructional Materials
(teacher edition, student
texts, support materials,
enrichment)
Pacing Guide/
Curriculum Map/ Scope
and Sequence
Student Strengths
Extending
Participating Teacher:
Contextualizing
Extending
Grade Level/Subject:
Contextualizing
Identification of EL
Students Home
Language
Standardized State
Test Results
State Language
Proficiency Test
Results
Extending
School/Grade Level
Assessments for EL
Students.
Adopted EL
Instructional Materials
Examination of State
ELD Standards
Technology Resources
for Instruction
Grade Level/Subject:
Health Problems
Individual Education
Plans (IEP)
SST Interventions
504 Plans
English learners
Language/Learning
Disability
Contextualizing
Goals/benchmarks
Modifications, accommodations,
variations
Extending
Resources
STAN DARD TW O:
3.5 Using and adapting resources, technologies, and standardsaligned instructional materials, including adopted materials, to
make subject matter accessible to all students
3.6 Addressing the needs of English learners and students with
special needs to provide equitable access to the content
STAN DARD SI X:
Glossary
And
Acronyms
School Accountability Report Card (SARC) Information provided annually by California public
schools to the community; allowing the public to
evaluate and compare schools for student
achievement,
environment,
resources,
and
demographics.
Acronyms
API
SBAC
AVID
SP
Support Provider
AYP
BTSA
SST
CDE
CELDT
CFASST
CCSS
CSTP
CTC
DAIT
DOK
Depth of Knowledge
EL
English Learners
FACT
GATE
IEP
IHE
IIP
IPS
MOU
Memorandum of Understanding
MTSS
PLC
PT
Participating Teacher
PTRA
SAIT
SARC
TPE
UA
Universal Access
UDL
CTP
RTI
Sources of Evidence
Documentation Source
Code
TPA
PE
CFTL
Observation
Lesson Plans
(Essential Components for Instruction)
LP
Reflection
Student Work
SW
Additional Resources
Symbaloo, a visual bookmarking tool, has been used to organize various resources. It
may be accessed by anyone on any computer (MAC, PC, or Mobile) at:
http://tinyurl.com/CAInduction
iTunes U
On an iPad or iPhone, download the free iTunesU app from the App Store. After
downloading, click the following link:
https://itunesu.itunes.apple.com/enroll/EX9-ADD-V55
A window will pop-up
Click Request Enrollment
Once approved, the course will download into the iTunesU library
Click the Posts tab to view resources
Induction
Standard 5
Pedagogy
CSTP 5
Induction
Standard 6B
Special
Populations
CSTP 2
Focus of
Inquiry
#____
How I implement systems that assess, plan, and provide academic and social skill
instruction to support students with complex behavioral and emotional needs.
How I work with educations, mental health, and other community resources in the
ongoing process of designing, implementing, evaluating and modifying identified
supports to ensure a positive learning environment.
Current and Emerging Research and Practices
How I interpret, apply and disseminate current and emerging research, theory,
legislation, policy and practice.
CSTP 4
How I collaborate with personnel from other educational and community agencies to
plan for successful transition by students.
Induction
Standard 5
Pedagogy
Mild/Moderate
Assessment of Students
How I identify, describe, select, and administer a variety of standardized and nonstandardized, formal and informal assessment procedures, and in use and interpret
these in a manner that is responsive to the cultural, socio-economic, and linguistic
characteristics of individual students.
Induction
Standard 5
Pedagogy
CSTP 3 & 4
Induction
Standard 6
Equity
CSTP 6
Focus of
Inquiry
#____
CSTP 4
CSTP 5
Focus of
Inquiry
#____
How I teach, adapt, modify and integrate curriculum appropriate to the educational
needs of students with mild/moderate disabilities.
Collaboration and Consultation
How I communicate, collaborate and consult with teachers and other school
personnel, community professionals, and parents.
How I coordinate before, during and after school special education placement.
CSTP 6
Moderate/Severe
Advanced Communication Skills
CSTP 6
How I work effectively within integrated service delivery models and actively
participate in school restructuring and reform efforts to impact systems change.
2/18/2015
Session #1
Session #1
50 min.
Advanced Supports
How do you work with resources in
the ongoing process of designing,
implementing, evaluating and
modifying identified student
supports?
Session #3
Session #2
Session #1
50 min.
Assessment of Students
How do I select a variety of
assessment measures and use
them?
How are Functional Behavioral
Assessments developed and
integrated into the Behavior Support
Plan?
Session #1
85min.
Transition Planning
Michael Laharty
85 minutes
Session #2
50 min.
Case Management
How can I most effectively review and
monitor each students Individual
Education Plan (IEP)?
What is the best method for
organizing my student records and
confidential files?
What is my plan to track the IEP
review dates and timelines?
What type of evidence/data do I need
for student progress towards IEP
goals?
How can I most effectively use my
instructional assistant(s) and/or oneon-one paraprofessional(s)? What are
their responsibilities?
Session #2
50 min.
Data-based Decision Making
How do I use data to modify or
change instructional strategies,
content or supports?
Session #4
Session #1
50 min.
Advanced Collaboration
What support or alternative programs
are available in my
district/county/SELPA and how are
these programs accessed and used?
Session #3
50 min.
Credentialing 101
Review of the IIP for Professional
Development: Clear Education
Specialist Candidates
Preparation for the Self Assessment
of Education Specialist Clear
Candidates
Session #3
50 min.
Credentialing 101
Review of the Education Specialist
Task Requirements
Session #2
85 min.
Collaboration and Consultation
85 min.
How do I inform the general education teachers of the
students specific needs, modifications, accommodations,
and/or behavioral support?
Outside of IEP meetings with parents, what system do I
have for informing parents of IEP goal progress?
How do I facilitate parent involvement as a means of
improving services and results for the child?
Session #2
50 min.
Leadership and Management
How do I work within integrated
service delivery models and actively
participate in school restructuring and
reform efforts.
Session #3
50 min.
Credentialing 101
Preparation for the Education
Specialist Inquiry/ Level 2
Competency presentations
Self-Assessment
Clear Education Specialist Candidates (E-2.7)
How do you
support student
integration into
the Least
Restrictive
Environment?
How do you
select
appropriate
professional
development to
expand your
skills?
Evidence:
How do you
integrate
current
research into
your practice?
Current Research
and Trends:
Evidence:
Professional
Development:
Evidence:
Reflection Planning
Prompts:
Collaboration,
Consultation, and
Co-teaching in the
Least Restrictive
Environment:
Describe your strengths and challenges related to integrating current research into your practice.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Describe your strengths and challenges related to collaboration, consultation, and co-teaching in the least
restrictive environment.
Initial Self-Assessment Date/Comments:
Page 1 of 1
Possible sources of evidence to review when addressing these prompts: Collaborative Log, Lesson Plan, Individual Induction Plan, Assessment Results; Student Work; Classroom Observation
Pedagogy
The Education Specialist Individual Induction Plan includes
the advanced and applied pedagogy to expand the holders
expertise in delivering services.
The participant shall
demonstrate awareness of current research, issues and
trends, evidence based practices in the field re: social,
academic and behavioral intervention, and current legal
issues. Education Specialists utilize advanced level datadriven instruction.
Participants reflect on their preliminary
teacher preparation and design a specific emphasis for their
Induction based on their authorization and their employment
assignment.
Directions: With your support provider review and discuss the standards below referencing any information gained through Conversation Guides.
Name: