Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Date:3/6/2015
To:Lynnette Yerbury
From:Mary Wright
RE:ABM Financial Analysis
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
P a g e 1 | 11
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
preceding year to a total of $27.3 million (ABM Industries, Discover how we serve your
industry).
With a little more current background on the company it helps to compare the financial
analysis with actions taken by the business. In 2010 ABM industries acquired The Linc Group,
LLC with cash of $300 million as they improve operating efficiencies, reduce energy
consumption and lower overall operational costs of critical Facilities (ABM Industries, March
2015). Two other major events that occurred in 2010 was ABM earned $160 million in revenues
from the Ampco System parking, and also acquired all of Diversco outstanding shares who
preform commercial cleaning, facility solutions, and security services. As a result of ABM
purchasing many companies in 2011 they were able to record a $4.2 billion revenue, and ended
up with just about 100,000 employees (this affecting payroll expenses). In 2012 ABM industries
changes their brand to ABM building value. Most recent history in 2013 being that the
company created a website to help and improve customer care. Now having the history
background I will focus on the competition (ABM Industries, Discover how we serve your
industry).
Competition
DTZ, Inc., and ARAMARK are close NYSE competitors with ABM industries Inc.
Moving powerfully forward and upward are the competitors AlliedBarton Security and Comfort
Systems USA with the services they offer and customer care. ABM industries has been
successful in the growing in services as they acquire more companies they also acquire more
services, they are also working on their customer care as shown through their website solely for
customer challenges. ABM is working to become the global leader in Integrated Facility
P a g e 2 | 11
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
Solutions (ABM Industries, Discover how we serve your industry). As they strive to become a
global leader suggesting it is poised to outperform it shows that ABM may be an interesting
play thanks to its forward PE of 16.14, its P/S ratio of 0.32, and its decent dividend yield of
2.18% (Zacks Equity Research).
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
Profitability
Profitability is the companys ability to make a profit (money), what keeps the business
running. Showing the companys capacity to obtain funding or debts and equity based on their
income.
Profit Margin Ratio: Measures the amount of sales dollars kept as money
obtained. ABM industries ratio is 1.52% and the industry average is 7.55%.
Rate of Return on Total Assets: Measures how profitable overall the company is.
ABM industries has a ratio of 4.32% below the industry average of 5.59%.
Asset Turnover Ratio: Determines how sales are generated by the use of assets.
ABM industries has a ratio of 2.42, three times more than the industry average of
0.74.
Earnings per share: Measures the share of common stock and how much net
income was earned for each share. ABM industries earning per share is 0.13%,
with no industry average to compare with Hoovers.
Overall ABM industries ranked high in all ratios and in most instances beat the industry
averages.
Investment Potential
Price Earnings Ratio: Examines the market price of common shares of stock
with earnings per share, and the companys future earnings. ABM industries
Pre/earnings ratio is 22.27 which is below the industry average of 27.86.
Ratio Analysis Conclusion
P a g e 5 | 11
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
By completing the Ratio analysis it examines the association of chosen items within
ABM Industries Inc. financial statements. The examination has provided the strengths and
weaknesses of the companys liquidity, solvency, profitability and investment potential.
Throughout the examination of ABM industries ratios we were able to compare them to the
industry averages thanks to Hoovers. In most situations we see that ABM industries
outperformed by beating the industry averages of liquidity, and solvency while profitability and
investment potential ratios were close but below the industry averages. The Company shows
strong in paying off their debts.
Investment
Now that we have completed the ratio analysis we can first state that the company is a
potential investment as they beat or came close to the majority of the industry averages. Taking a
closer look at the investment to decide either debt or equity. As ABM has shown to have stable
ratios looking back at liquidity, solvency, profitability, and investment potential we see that the
strongest were liquidity and solvency, The company showed that their ability to pay debts as
their strong suit. Along with their consistency of financial statements the disclosure notes and
transparency of the company were good. With that being said ABM industries are a stronger debt
investment then equity.
P a g e 6 | 11
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
Works Cited
ABM industries. Annual Reports. ABM. SOC3, 2015. Web 09 Mar. 2015
<http://investor.abm.com/annuals.cfm>
ABM Industries. "Discover how we serve your industry." Building Maintenance and Facility
Services from ABM. SOC3, Jan 2015. Web. 06 Mar. 2015.
<http://www.abm.com/Pages/default.aspx>
McLellan, Michael. Salt Lake Community College. Salt Lake Community College. New York
Stock Exchange, 2015. Web. 09 Mar. 2015.
P a g e 7 | 11
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
<http://subscriber.hoovers.com.dbprox.slcc.edu/H/company360/competitiveLandscape.ht
ml?companyId=10076000000000>
Zacks Equity Research. Looking for Value? Why It Might Be Time to Try ABM Industries.
Our Research. Your Success. Zacks, 6 Mar. 2015. Web. 9 Mar. 2015.
< http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/166741/looking-for-value-why-it-might-be-time-totry-abm-industries-abm?source=sa>
Appendix A
Sent in a separate file would not transfer to word document.
Appendix B
Liquidity
Working Capital
Current Ratio
2013 (in
thousands)
2013 Ratio Calculation
$356,108
864,632-508,524
1.70
864,632/508,524
P a g e 8 | 11
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
Cash Ratio
0.06
Acid-Test Ratio
1.26
Solvency
Debt Ratio
Debt to equity ratio
Times-interest earned ratio
32,639/508,524
(32,639+572,525+36,623)/508,52
4
2013(thousa
nds)
2013 Ratio Calculation
0.57
1,201,729/2.119,236
1.31
1,201,729/917,507
9.72
(72,900+39,552+12,892)/12,892
2013(thousa
nds)
2013 Ratio Calculation
1.52%
72,900/4,809,281
(72,900+12,892)/
4.32%
(2,119,236+1,851,158)/2
4,809,281/
2.42
(2,119,236+1,851,158)/2
132.67
(72,900-0)/(555+544)/2
(72,900-0)/
0.13%
(55,477,813+54,393,907)/2
Investment Potentail
Price/earnings ratio
2013(thousa
nds)
2013 Ratio Calculation
21544.84
28.59/0.0013270
Liquidity
Working Capital
Current Ratio
Cash Ratio
Acid-Test Ratio
2014(thousa
nds)
2014 Ratio Calculation
$400,800
927,200-526,400
1.76
927,200/526,400
0.07
36,700/526,400
1.49
(36,700+748,200+0)/526,400
Solvency
Debt Ratio
Debt to equity ratio
Times-interest earned ratio
2014(thousa
nds)
2014 Ratio Calculation
0.56
1,224,100/2,192,900
1.26
1,224,100/968,800
9.92
(75,600+39,500+12,900)/12,900
Profitabliity
Profit Margin Ratio
ROA
Asset Turnover Ratio
R of Return on Com SH E
Profitabliity
Profit Margin Ratio
ROA
2014(thousa
nds)
2014 Ratio Calculation
1.50%
75,600/5,032,800
(75,600+12,900)/
4.10%
(2,192,900+2,119,200)/2.
P a g e 9 | 11
Lynnette Yerbury
3/6/2015
Mary Wright
2.33
126.00
0.14%
Investment Potentail
Price/earnings ratio
5,032,800/
(2,192,900+2,119,200)/2
(75,600-0)/(600+600)/2
(75,600-0)/
(55,691,350+55,477,813)/2
2014(thousa
nds)
2014 Ratio Calculation
21542.53
29.30/0.0013601
P a g e 10 | 11