Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
expectation clarity, self-induced errors, what about training, and where to put the information (18).
Recommendations of how to move forward are part of the presentation given to stakeholders as well an
explanation of the intervention change based on the data discovered through the initial data gathering
and discovery (18).
How the completion of the program outcome incorporates the literature
The ARPP is a systematic path used to understand and analyze, and resolve identified problems
within an organization to which the action researcher is intimately involved. It is a process of inquiry and
following a systemic process increases interaction with other organization members, which grows the
researchers critical perspective in various arenas (Kuhne and Quigley, 1997). Involving others in the
research study is highly encouraged, other perspectives minimize the chances that the intervention
chosen fails to address the problem (13). Start slow and refrain from taking on a problem with too many
other problems attached to it, action research is cyclical and encourages double-loop learning taking on
too much may result in never solving the issue (Capella, n.d.). Through the action research process
journaling is a powerful tool that not only helps the researcher make quick notes during observations but
something written down along the way could later become relevant in a way not thought of before. One of
the last steps in the process requires the researcher to reflect on the results of the intervention and during
the evaluation process. Reflection raises questions regarding how to move forward, is there another cycle
to plan or perhaps there is something needs improving upon (18). Reflection is relevant before starting
the planning phase to consider engaging other professionals to discuss the perceived problem is it
appropriate for action research, is it manageable in size or too big to tackle without significant
collaboration from others (Kuhne and Quigley, 1997).