[-20,250],

[-5,10]

(-1000,1000),
(-1000,1000)

After examining both graphs, I believe that the most appropriate

regression to use when examining the length of the arrow versus the
weight of the arrow is a quadratic regression:

While the parabola used to model this information is very small, it is

the most accurate of the two as it better describes the relationship
between the weight of an arrow and an arrow spine

This information should not be modeled as linear as it does not

increase in a linear pattern. For example, if we were to predict the
length of the spine using a linear equation, it would be decreasing by
a fairly constant amount as the weight of the arrow increases