Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
. .
. .
- -
Abstract
The administrative thought has been faced many developments
each of it was aimed to investigate about the real reasons of decline or
improvements in the organizational performance, the organizational
activities it's self wasn't far away from the development which is
covered it's conceptual sides, the last one of it was the virtual
organizational development which has great attractiveness because of its
comprehensively that depends on the high diagnostic level to the
managerial processes. This research interest with this kind of
development and examine it's main domains in Solaymanyia in Iraqi
Kurdistan region environment, and to sample covered big size
organizations depending on selected administrative levels for the sake of
knowing the model items homogeneity which has been selected. The
/ / /
/ / /
)(112
.
.
.
- -
:
)(113
.
.
:
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
:
:
.
.
.
)(114
:
:
) (1
) (
:
.
:
:
.
:
.
:
.
.
:
checklist
) (Larry and Voronice,2000
.
:
)(115
:
.
:
) ( ) (0.855
).(0.860
:
:
.
.
.
.
:
. . . . .
-
) (100 ) (84
.
.
)(116
) (1
3.57
10
11.9
28
33.3
31
36.9
12
14.28
2.4
19
22.6
17
20.2
33
39.3
13
15.5
11-20
1-10
31-.
21-30
8.3.
18
21.42
56
66.66
3.57
74
88.09
10
11.91
20
27.02
29
39.18
25
33.78
5.4
14
18.91
34
45.94
20
27.02
2.7
)(117
:
:
)
.(103 : 2000
) .(75 : 2001
) (French and Bell,1999:41
(Schere,1984:60) :
- -
) (Smith,2004:261
) (Richard,1990:18
) (Shafritz,2006:384
.
) .(21 :1985
) (Worley,1997:1
.
)(118
) .(Joseph and Dess,1998:48 :
)(Worley,1997:2
.
.
.
.
) .(72: 2001
(David,1993:33) :
.
.
.
) .(Huey,2004:56
) .(183 : 2006
-
-
).(Worly and Cumming,2003:2
:
) : (183 : 2006
.1
.
)(119
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
- -
.
.
.
) .(51: 2004
.
.
:
)) (Moreno,1996:83 ) (13:1996, ) (42: 2002
(9: 2006
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
:
)(120
- :Structural Approach
).(Paawee,2001:91
- :Behavioral Approach
) .(48:1995
- :Contemporary Approach
) .(21: 2007
) :(41 :1998
.
.
) :
(49: 2004
.1 :Rational Strategy
.
.2 :Normative Reductive Strategy
.
.3 :Power Coercive Strategy
.
)(121
:
- ) (Martin,1999 theory
of value
.
:
resources
.
diagnostic
.
.
.
.
- ) (Matos and Afsarmanesh,2002
Dynamic Virtual Organizations
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
)(122
:
:
:
.
)(2
1.875
1.658
0.05
0.720
1.658
0.05
0.192
-0.159
2.086
3.373
0.01
0.188
1.658
0.05
-0.015
1.677
1.658
0.05
-0.070
0.314
:
)(123
.
)(3
0.423
2.088
1.658
0.05
0.307
1.443
1.658
0.05
0.550
2.945
3.373
0.01
0.353
1.687
1.658
0.05
0.491
2.521
1.658
0.05
.
- :
.
)(4
0.448
2.076
1.658
0.05
0.201
1.502
1.658
0.05
0.301
1.423
1.658
0.05
-0.520
2.945
3.373
0.01
0.489
1.076
1.658
0.05
0.353
1.687
1.658
0.05
0.491
2.521
1.658
0.05
) (4
.
:
) (
)(124
.
.1 :
:
)(5
R2
1.11
4.35
%5.3
0.2879
0.2879
5.1667
20
0.2583
5.4545
21
) (5
) (R2 = %5.3
) (F ) (1.11
) (4.35 ) (0.05 ) (%95
) (21.1
.
)(6
R2
0.04
4.35
%0.2
0.0105
0.0105
5.4440
20
0.2722
5.4545
21
) (0.05
) (6
) ( R2 = %0.2
) (F ) (0.04
) (4.35 ) (0.05 ) (%95
) (21.1
.
)(7
R2
0.0105
0.0105
0.4
4.35
%0.2
)(125
5.4440
20
5.4545
21
0.2722
) (7
) (R2 = %0.2
) (F ) (0.4
) (4.35 ) (0.05 ) (%95
) (1.21
.
.2 :
.
)(8
R2
1.11
4.35
%5.3
0.2879
0.2879
5.1667
20
0.2583
5.4545
21
) (8
) (R2 = %5.3
) (F ) (1.11 ) (4.35
) (0.05 ) (%95 ) (1.21
.
)(9
0.0004
0.0004
5.4542
20
0.2727
5.4546
21
R2
0.21
4.35
%0.0
) (0.05
) (9
) (R2 = %0.0
. ) (F ) (0.21
) (4.35 ) (0.05 ) (%95 ) (1.21
.
)(10
R2
0.0558
0.0558
0.21
4.35
%1.0
)(126
5.3987
20
5.4545
21
0.2699
) (0.05
) (10
) ( R2 = %1.0
) (F ) (0.21
) (4.35 ) (0.05
) (%95 ) (1.21
.
.3 :
.
)(11
R2
0.67
4.35
%3.3
0.1774
0.1774
5.2771
20
0.2639
5.4545
21
) (0.05
) (11
) (R2 = %3.3
) (F ) (0.67
) (4.35 ) (0.05 ) (%95
) (1.21
.
)(12
0.1420
0.1420
5.3125
20
0.2656
5.4545
21
R2
0.53
4.35
%2.6
) (0.05
) (12
) (R2 = %2.6
) (F ) (0.53
) (4.35 ) (0.05 ) (%95
) (1.21
.
)(127
)(13
R2
0.1420
0.53
4.35
%2.6
0.2656
0.1420
5.3125
20
21
5.4545
) (0.05
) (13
) (R2 = %2.6
) (F
) (0.53 ) (4.35 ) (0.05
) (%95 ) (1.21
.
.4 :
.
)(14
R2
2.05
4.35
%9.3
0.4606
0.4606
4.4940
20
0.2247
4.9546
21
) (0.05
) (14
) ( R2 = %9.3
) (F )(2.05
) (4.35 ) (0.05
) (%95 ) (21.1
.
)(15
R2
0.9545
0.9545
4.77
4.35
%9.3
)(128
4.0000
20
4.9545
21
0.2000
) (0.01
) (15
) (R2 = %9.3
) (F ) (4.77
) (4.35 ) (0.01 ) (%99
) (1.21
.
)(16
R2
0.4606
0.4606
2.05
4.35
%9.3
4.4940
20
0.2247
4.9546
21
) (0.05
) (16
) (R2 = %9.3
) (F ) (2.05 )(0.05
) (%95 ) (1.21
.
:
:
:
:
.1
.
.2
.
)(129
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.
-
-
.
.
-
-
:
.
:
) ( ) ( ) (
) (%35
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.1
.
)(130
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.
.
.
.
.
.
: :
.1 " :
" ) (10) (36
.2004
.2
, " , " ,
.3
, .2001 ,
.2000
.4
" , : "
.5
.6
).1985 (48
.1998
.1995
)(131
, " " ,
.7
" "
.8
.9
.2002 ,
.2004
.2006
, , , .10
.2007 ,
, , , , , , .11
.2006
: .12
.1996
.13
.2001
:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
(132)
16. Larry, Martin and Voronice, M. G., "Statement of Work: the Foundation for
Delivering Successful Service Projects", PMN Networks, Vol. (10), 2000.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
.
.
.
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
2
3
4
5
.
.
.
.
.
6
7
.
.
....................................................................................
.........................................................
)(133
..................
)(134