(2013 )27

" "

/
:

, .
Iraq has suffered a variety of

problems caused by over urbanization as a result

of the absence of integrated regional development

policies at all areas and regions of the country.

-1

Where these problems took two sides:

1 - the concentration of urban population in a

- 2

limited number of cities, especially in major cities

as a result of the availability of the attractions

2 - that this concentration of the urban population

physical

and

with

economic

match

doesnt
potential

The failure of the regional development methods

followed by Iraq in the early stages to face the

Abstract:

achieve

and

urbanization

over

problems of

balanced development between provinces, due to

, ,

the extreme centralization in decision-making

development, called for the need to consolidate

, (,

and integrate spatial dimension and urban in all

,)

strategies, policies, plans and sectors programs at

all levels (national, regional and local), depending

central

from a side and local, regional

the

between

participation

the

on

government

administration, private sector , the local community

from the other, within the framework of integration,

flexibility and transparency in the decision-making

process.

-1-


(2013 )27

:


.
: :
-1 (
)

.
-2

:

.
/ :
: ( )

,
( )Urbanization

, ,

( .)1

( )Hoselits

()2

( )Browning

(. )3

,

.

-2-


(2013 )27

( )1

1985 2010

)%29.7 ( 1950 ( )%47.4

2000

( )%68.8 1985

( )%50

2005

( )%78.7 2005

( )%53.8
( )%60
(. )4

,2025

2025

( )%83.9 2025
.

()1

) (2010-1985 2025

1985

15.3

()

()

10.5

68.8

4.7

1990

18.1

3.3

12.9

4.1

5.0

1.2

71.8

1995

20.0

2.1

14.9

2.8

5.1

0.1

74.5

2000

23.1

2.8

17.7

3.4

5.3

0.9

76.8

2005

26.6

2.9

21.0

3.3

5.6

1.1

78.8

2010

30.4

2.6

24.4

3.0

5.9

1.0

80.3

2015

34.2

2.3

27.9

2.6

6.2

1.0

81.6

2020

38.0

2.0

31.4

2.3

6.5

0.7

82.8

2025

41.6

1.8

34.9

2.0

6.6

0.4

83.9

: : , , ,2005 25-16

. R = Ln ( Pt / Po ) / T . 100
:R : :Pt , :Po , :T , :Ln ,

-3-


(2013 )27

, ,

, ,

-1 :

-2 :

, ,

(. )5

( ) ,

( )Slums Area

,

( )3.4 %
.

.
-3 :

( )36% 1947 ( )51% 1965

( )64% 1977

( )1.7% (.)6
,

, ,

.
( )1
( )
.

-4-


(2013 )27

()1
( ) 2000 1947

-1 : , , , 1965-1947

-2

, , 2000

: .

(.)7

( .)8

:
-5-


(2013 )27

-1 :

, : ,

, ( )2

( ) .

1965

( . )1995- 1991

, ,

()2
( )1995 -1965
1965

1977

1987

1995

25.4

26.6

23.5

24.5

30.7

20.7

37.5

37.6

:1
1983. 30
-2 / 2000

-2 :

-
.
-

()9

.
-

.
-

.
-6-


(2013 )27

-3 :

(.)10

.
()

.

1997 ( )%60
( )%30
(

)%8

() 11

( )Mike Davis

( )%78.2

-4 :

() 12

: ( )


,

:
-7-


(2013 )27

-1 :

, ,
, ,


, .

()
,

( . )15

(.)13

-2 :

(. )14

-3 :
(

:
.
:
.

,


.
-8-


(2013 )27

:
.

, (

)80-76

( ) %20.7

(. ) 16

(. )%21

( , )%9.6

) )74-70( )80-76

.


,

() 17

:1
.

( )%6.2
.
(

)85-81

( )%37.5
( )90-86 ( )%21.7
( )95-91 ( (%37.6
( )%10.1

( )85-81 ( (%16.5
( )90-86
( )95-91 (

(%13.2

, (.)3

-9-


(2013 )27

()3
((95-91( - (74-70

(% ) 74-70

)%( 80-76

)%( 85-81

)%( 90-86

)%( 95-91

23.98

20.7

37.5

21.7

37.6

14.89

21.2

10.1

16.5

13.2

5.90

4.7

9.3

12.5

6.4

5.71

3.6

5.3

3.6

1.4

3.70

2.7

1.4

0.3

4.42

2.6

0.1

1.47

2.2

1.2

0.8

0.1

5.35

5.3

2.5

1.9

9.9

6.79

9.9

10.2

13.9

8.4

6.2

6.9

6.6

9.4

6.75

3.1

1.8

7.6

7.7

1.66

1.7

2.1

1.1

0.3

2.0

1.8

1.9

2.2

2.58

2.2

1.1

0.2

2.95

1.1

1.7

1.1

0.5

3.32

3.8

2.6

5.3

5.16

2.7

1.7

0.9

1.1

5.53

3.9

2.5

1.9

0.9

% 100

% 100

% 100

% 100

% 100

-1: : , 1995/1976
- 2 , , ( , )1990-1947 ()21-18

( )95-91

( )18

) :,

10


(2013 )27

-2

( )

: :

-1 :

: , , ,

( )2394 ( , )2678 ( ,)1178 ( , )1228

1981-1985

, ,,

( )976

()19

( )%45

( )5000 (, )4027 ( , )4987( , )4027

( ,)80-76 (

1995-1991

( )2303 ( )580( )698

1981-1985 ( )545( )834

1995-1991
( ) 20

( )%58.8

( )%38.6 ( )90-86
( (%19.5 :,

()%5.3( , )%5.5

,
,:
,
,

)85-81

( ) 21

.


,

( .)4

( )4

- 11 -


(2013 )27

(,)85-81

(90-

)86

( )85-81

( )90-86

( )%

()%

()%

()%

58.8

44.6

38.6

39.1

6.6

11.1

19.5

10.1

3.4

5.4

5.5

6.8

2.0

1.2

3.4

3.4

1.6

10.2

2.0

8.3

1.6

4.1

3.5

3.2

1.3

1.2

1.3

1.3

1.6

5.5

3.2

2.5

6.0

2.5

3.6

2.2

5.0

1.7

5.3

3.1

1.1

1.4

2.2

4.8

1.6

1.2

1.8

2.3

3.0

3.1

1.0

2.5

1.3

0.7

0.9

1.6

1.0

1.2

0.5

1.1

1.0

1.4

4.5

3.6

2.1

2.0

1.2

2.8

1.0

1.6

2.1

1.4

% 100

% 100

% 100

% 100

: , (

, 1990 , 5-3

( )90-86

(139/)

, , ,

( 403/)

( )85-81

, ,

( , )90-86 (.) 5
12

)85-81


(2013 )27

( ) 5

()90-86(,)85-81

( )90-86

( )85-81

795

65

230

50

319

57

511

58

159

27

83

22

192

13

135

29

132

96

58

53

113

30

85

17

255

24

102

22

143

48

76

13

642

26

98

13

699

1.7

162

21

96

13

45

21

311

25

80

23

403

45

40

21

164

10

37

14

211

31

37

18

91

13

110

19

326

31

54

29

124

1.6

89

13

403

43

139

30

- 1 , ( , 1990,85-8120
-2 , ( 1990 ,(90-86
, 17-15

-2 :

- 13 -


(2013 )27

, (

( )5/1

2009

( ( )Ziph )

) 2

( )2/1

( ) 2
2009

: 2009-2008

(/)

: .

(/) ( /)

-1 :

( )50000/1 2007

,
14


(2013 )27

)1194/1

( )91608/1

(.)202028/1

( ,

, ,) .

( / ),

( / )

16508

( , )500/1 ,

2007

( )521/1( )635/1

( )1798 .

, ,,

( , )1000/1

() 6

( ) 6
()2007
/

91608

1194

635

112501

1406

521

156171

1384

836

112752

1464

769

120047

2822

1324

135089

1991

1073

119140

1858

849

165156

1601

1292

126836

1349

949

135150

1479

1260

123810

1904

969

102499

1971

689

202028

2981

1412

117735

2467

794

106495

2209

754

50000/ 1

1000/1

500/1

: , , 2007/2006

-2 :

, .

15


(2013 )27

( )5000

: , , ,,

()22

. ( /)

( , )20

( 475 ,453, 452 , 407 ,

)520,/

: , , .

2007/2006 ( 360

(/)

/) ,

(/) . ()7

684

( ) 7
()2007/2006

407

21

650

20

520

25

394

14

407

35

472

21

247

17

309

14

347

17

329

12

345

20

320

16

260

18

296

20

452

19

475

12

453

17

496

12

475

23

437

15

366

17

435

12

341

19

397

18

306

18

340

14

273

16

362

14

310

18

415

14

360

20

540

18

: , , 2007/2006

: ( ).
16


(2013 )27

-1 :

-2 :

( : , ) ,

() 23

- : :
.

() 24

- -

.
- .
- .

.
.

, ,

( ) 80-76 ( )85-81
()25

.
- :

.
.

.
-3 :

,

- 17 -

(. ) 26


(2013 )27

2015

(. ) 27

( )%70-60

( )%42-39

()28

-1 :

- -

.
-4 :

- -

, 1982

- -

( . )29

,


-5 :

,
, , .

1980

-2 :
- -

- -

- -

( ) ,
- 18 -


(2013 )27

, -

-3 :

( )

:
- ,

:
: (

.
- -

) :

- ,,

19


(2013 )27

: :

-1

, ,

-2

-3

-4

-1

-4

-5

( ,

, ,

, ) .

.
- 20 -


(2013 )27

-2 (

-6

,1988, 15150-48

7- Heilbran . J , " Urban Economic and

Public Policy ",2 nd Ed , New York , 1981.

P8-10

-3

-8

2005

,72

-9 .

-10

1- United Nation , " Demographic "Year Book

, New York , 1986.P 175-177

2- Polus . Sami , " The Urban Growth

Theories and the Urban Growth Pattern for

the Upper Euphrate Region of Iraq " , Ph . D ,

The Submitted to the University of Sheffield ,
1982

383
-11

5-3
,1997 24
12- Mike Davis , " Planet of Slums " , NLR ,

" 3- Wilbert . E Moore and Neil J . Smelser ,

26 , Mar , 2004,P38

Modernization of Traditional

13- Molle . W , Regional Disparty and

countries , Prentice , Hall , London , 1966.

Community " , Saxon House Riddles LTD ,

Societies series
development

newly

in

Urbanization

"

P133-135
4- United Nation , " Population Division World
" , Urbanization Prospects , ESA/D/WP-173
, 2005

-5

38

London , 1996 , P3-5

-14


9-7 ,1988 2

the European

in

Development

Economic

,1977,-37

-15
( ) ,2002 12

- 21 -


(2013 )27

-16

-24

832

1990

,1984 20120-19

-17

-25

, 1987 509 17-16

-18

754

,1989 ,50

-26

1995/1991 ,1995 15-11

-1-19

85-811986
-20
1995-

1991
-21
,
,19839

1998
-27
:

, 2/

1995
-28

-22 ,

, 20013

-23

-29 , ,

(
) ,1987 23-21

,

, ,

- 22 -

,199917