/ 2010 /

.





.

Abstract:
As the world markets are expanding and the products and services among various markets are
transferring fast, the completion increased to make the work reality more complicated and
presence and lasting of the organization were subject to performance level and capability to find
a status in the market through offering what persuades customs and meets their needs of high
quality products and services. Therefore, the organizations were devoted to substitute the
traditional administrative techniques with other modern ones which are going to be helpful for
distinction and transferring from regular performance to a high quality one. Thus, the high
performance of the organization and its techniques of measuring performance have got the same
importance. The organizations launched to measure their performance periodically because of its
importance to identify the powerful and weak spots in the organization's performance.
Consequently, the organization would be able to assess the powerful spots to outburst upward
and come over the weak spots. Accordingly, the establishing of high performance organizations
and measuring their performance have got a great importance by researches and theorists in
management science through submitting important researches and studies in this field which this
research is a part of them

.

.

.
:

.

85

 / 2010 /


.

.


.

.

.

1-1
1-1-1
-:
.1
.2
.3 .
.4 .
.5 .
2-1-1
:
. 1
.
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
3-1-1


-:
.1
.2
4-1-1

.
5-1-1



.
6-1-1

.

86

 / 2010 /
2-1
1-2-1
( .1 )2009 :

.
.
.
( .2 )2009 : ) (BSC
"
.
) (BSC
.
(.3 )2004 :
) " (BSC
.
( .4 )2001: "
) (BSC
.
2-2-1
(How To Build A High PreformanceOrganization) (Jamrog& other:2007) .1


1369
.


.

1-2
1-1-2
-:
). (http://www.i4cp.com


). (Jim,clemmer:2007:p2
Brown

) . (Brown:2006.p5 1.
.( Mulntyre, Brian J: 2004:p2

. ( Edward E,Lawler:2002:p2)
Frank

). (Buytendijk,Frank:2006:p1

. (
) Mclntyre,Brian:2004:p2

.

87

 / 2010 /

.

( )

( )1
Source: Mulntyre, Brian J. Building A High Preformance Organization,
http//www. workstrategy.net. :2004:p2
2-1-2

-:(Duran,Daniel F: 2008:P8-13
Employee Involvement
.1

-:
.1
.2
Self-Directing work team
.2
-:
.1 .
.2 .
.3
.
-:
) (David W:2009:p
.1 .
.2 .

.
Integrated Production Technologie
.3


(Duran,Daniel F: -:
)2008:P8-13
.1 . JIT
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .

88

 / 2010 /
Organization Learning
.4


.

. .( Porter ,Tom. & other.1995:p

TQM
.5

-:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.6 Highly autonomous and decentralized
) (jem, clemmer : 2001 :p1
.
Intense Customer and Market Focus
.7

.
.
Servant-Leadership
.8
.

.
Networks, Partnerships, and Alliances
.9 ,


.

Few Management Levels
. 10

.

One Customer Contact Point
.11

.
Performance Measurement(Mclntyre,Brian:2004:p2
.12
.
Build a culture
.13

.
.

89

 / 2010 /
3-1-2
Business Process Re-engineering
1-3-1-2
,:2010:3 -:
:
.
.

.

.



.

-: ,:2010:3
/ 1


.
/2


.
.
.
/ 3

.
.

. . .


.
:- ,:2002:2
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5
.
. .

.

90

 / 2010 /
2-3-1-2
Use Enterprise Solutions to Achieve Higher Performance Levels
) (ERP

.
10
(Mark R. Willford:2004:P1) -:
.1
View enterprise systems as an ongoing program to improve performance and drive value


.
.2
Accelerate value creation by targeting tangible business benefits

.
.
.3
Optimize your enterprise architecture to deliver value.
.

.
.
.4
Customize enterprise system applications to gain competitive advantageand for no other
reason..

.

%20- %15 .

.
.5
Adopt a business readiness program to not only manage change but actively embrace it
.

,
.


.
.6
Understand your core competencies and evaluate outsourcing options


.

. . .

91

 / 2010 /

.7 ( )

Use a real-time snapshot of enterprise performance to make the right decision s

.
-

.
Maximize the value of your supply chain
.8 .
)(Waish,Ken:2001:p3-4

.

.
.9
Use customer insight to expand your customer base and secure customer loyalty.

) (www.tech-faq.com

.
.10
Assess and adopt new technologies that can empower the organization
) (Mark R. Willford:2004:P2 .

.
3-3-1-2
Five Keys To Building A High Performance Organization
.




(Buytendijk,Frank:2006:1-3) -:
The Missions:Set Ambitious Targets
.1
.

.
.
Pinpoint Shared Values
.2

.

.

.
How To Exeeute
.3
.

.
.

92

 / 2010 /

. .

.


. 2

* *
* IT * *

( )2
Sourse: (Buytendijk,Frank" Five Keys To Building A High Performance
)Organization":2006:p1-3
:
Data and Process Standardization
.4

.

. .
.
.
Agility Is Key
.5

.

. -:
:
.
:

.
: .
.
. .
: .

93

 / 2010 /
Intellectual Capital
4-3-1-2

.



.


. -: :
:2003 117-114
Cognitive Knowledge
-1
- ? Know-What
.
Advanced Skills
-2
? Know-How
.
Understading Systems
-3
? Know-Why
.
Self Motivated Creativity
-4
? Care Why
.
4-1-2
Balanced Scorecard Model
1-4-1-2 :
BSC



: .
)(Horngren, et.al., 2003: 447-448
3 :

()3

Source: Blocher, E, J. & Chen, k, H. & Lin, Thomas W., "Cost Management,
A Strategic Emphasis", 2nd ed., McGraw- Hill Irwin, U.S.A 2002: 43

94

 / 2010 /


.
(Horngren, et.al., 2003: 448):
* :
.
* :
.
* : : 2009: 12

.

.
* (Horngren, et.al., 2003: 448) :


.

2-4-1-2
The High Performance Organization's measuring model
-:
)(www.amanet.org
Strategic approach
.1

.

.
Customer approach
.2


.
Leadership approach
.3


.
Processes and Structure
.4

.
.
.
Values and Beliefs
.5
.

.
4

95

 / 2010 /

()4

Source: American Management Association ,"How TO Build High
Perfomance organization",2007:p 18.www.amanet.org.

-3
1-3




.
1
%90 Likert

1-1-3


-:
/ .
.

.
.1
.2

.3
.4
:

96

 / 2010 /
-2
.
-3
.
25
1 .
2-1-3
.
2 3 4 .
( )1

40
50-41
60-51
60-

2
14
9
25

8%
56%
36%
100%

( )2


56%
14
32%
8
8%
2
4%
1
100%
25

( )3



8%
2

52%
13

4%
1

28%
7

8%
2

100%
25

( )4



40%
10
5
12%
3
10-5
8%
2
15-10
8%
2
20-15
4%
1
25-20
28%
7
25
100%
25

97

 / 2010 /
5 2
%83.2
10
%56.
( )5

11
12

3.12

3.08

3.77

3.20

3.74

64.0%

3.00

62.4%

3.81

65.6%

1
2

11

3.12

3.28

15

61.6%

2.52

62.4%

10

1.53

60.8%

10

11

3.04

10

10

11

4.16

4.92

83.2%

3.28

2.74

65.6%

3.44

5.79

68.8%

10

2.80

2.87

56.0%

3.16

2.65

63.2%

3.28

2.74

65.6%

3.25

98

 / 2010 /
6 3
%82.4

10 %56.8
( )6

12

11

10

3.80

3.74

3.56

1.89

71.2%
76.0%

10

10

4.12

4.35

82.4%

10

3.44

2.63

68.8%

3
2
6

7
7
6

7
8

1
1

2.96
3.04
3.52

3.19
3.24
1.26

59.2%
60.8%
70.4%

3.00

1.00

60.0%

2.88

3.00

57.6%

10

10

2.84

3.16

56.8%

11

3.16

3.32

63.2%

3.44

2.92

68.8%

3.31

99

 / 2010 /
7 3
%78.4
%47.2
( )7

11

10

4
4

10
4
17
4

2
6

9
8

13
12
2
5

2.84

2.64
2.36
3.56

4
1
2

2
1
10

3.08
3.88
2.60

3.36

3.24

100

10

3.92

3.67

1.87

3.08
2.65
5.69
4.00
6.82
3.00

2.74

3.52

2.65

70.4%
78.4%

56.8%

52.8%
47.2%
71.2%
61.6%
77.6%
52.0%

67.2%

10

3.84

3.54

76.8%

.










(

)

5
1
8
9
11
4
7
2
10

 / 2010 /
8 12
%82.4
10 %45.6 .
( )8

12

11

10

2.92

1.15

58.4%

3.04

3.54

60.8%

5
6

"

"




.

2.80

1.87

56.0%

3.00

3.00

60.0%

1
2
1

12
5
6

8
8
8

3
5
5

1
5
5

3.36
2.76
2.72

4.85
2.12
2.55

67.2%
55.2%
54.4%

2
8
9

3.08

2.74

61.6%

11

3.04

3.67

60.8%

2
5

3
8

15

6
3

3
7

11
2

2.28
3.28

4.12

3.03

101

3.67
2.55

6.40

45.6%
65.6%

82.4%

10
3
1

 / 2010 /
9 7
%83.2
4 %63.2.
3.24
3.
( )9

12

11

10

11
6
5
2

2
6

10
13
12
11

16
12

15

2
5
4
8

3
3

4
5

7
1

16
10

3.72

4.72

13

74.4%

13

3.80

4.57

76.0%

5
7

(
)...

( )


()

1
6

1
1

4.08
3.16

7.09
3.94

81.6%
63.2%

2
12

3.32

3.08

66.4%

11

4.00

1
3

3.96
1

3.68
3.44

4
3

4.16

3.64
1

3.76

3.73

102

6.13

5.05
4.99
4.18
4.03

6.55
4.30

80.0%

83.2%
79.2%
73.6%
68.8%

72.8%
75.2%

10

 / 2010 /

1-4
1-1-4
.1
.
.2

.
.3
.
.4
.
.5
.
. 6


% 47.2
%45.6.
.7 .

2-1-4
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

:
. 1

1. The Five Domains ahigh Preformance ,2010, http//www.iucp.com.

2. Jim,Clemmer.2001, High Preformance Organization And Characteristics, http//www.
Clemmer.net.
3. Edward, Lawler III .2002,Designing High Preformance Organization. High Preformance
Organization
4. Buytendijk,Frank.2006, The Five Key to Building A High Preformance Organization,
http//www. bpmmag.net.
5. Duran, Danied F.2008,Overview of HR Starategy and Development / Evolution of High
Preformance Organization.

103

 / 2010 /
6. Mark R ,Willford. 2004,Ten Ways to Use Enterprise Solutions to Achieve Higher
Performance Levels.
7. Mulntyre, Brian J. Building A High Preformance Organization, http//www. workstrategy.net.
8. Brown,Eric D., 2006,Implementing A High Preformance Work System, http//www.
ericbrown.com.
9. How To Build A High Preformance Organization ,www.amanet.org.
10. David W,Favor.2009, What is A High Preformance Organization, http//www.
wisebusinessleaderblog.com.
11. Porter ,Tom. John, Pickering and Gerry, Brokaw.1995, Building A High Preformance
Organizations For The Twenty-First Century : Lessons Fome Charleston Naval Shipyard,
12. Www.tech-faq.com
13. Ken Waish ,Enterprise Resourses Planning And Supply Chain Management,2001, email
Kwaish@isu.edu. OR Center For Virtual Organization And Commerce @ISDS@ Louisiana
State University.
14. Horngren, Charles T., et. al., Cost Accounting, A Managerial Emphasis, Pearson Prentice
Hall, U.S.A, 11th ed, 2003.
15. Blocher, Edward J. & Chen, Kung H. & Lin, Thomas W., Cost Management, A Strategic
Emphasis, 2nd ed., McGraw- Hill Irwin, U.S.A, 2002

. 2
.1 2002 . . chief@al-jazirah.com
.2 2010 . http//www.mmsec.com.
.

:
.1 2003 .
.
.2 2001 .
57 ..
.3 " .2009 . ) (BSC
" . .

:
.1 . 2004
BSC -.

/ /
.1 .
.2 . / /
.3 . / /
/ /
.4
/ /
.5 .
.6 . / /
/ /
.7 .

104