Brewster et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al Doc.

25
Case 3:07-cv-01688-WHA Document 25 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10 JOSEPH BREWSTER and CECIL No. C 07-01688 WHA
11 BREWSTER,
United States District Court

Plaintiffs,
For the Northern District of California

12 REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

13 v.

14 A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

15 Defendants.
/
16
17 The Court has received Ms. Chun’s application to appear pro hac vice. Ms. Chun’s

18 application indicates that she is an active member in good standing of the bar of the Supreme

19 Court of California. She apparently practices in Berkeley, California. By 4:00 P.M. on

20 TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2007, Ms. Chun will please file a statement indicating why the Court

21 should not find her ineligible to practice pro hac vice under Civil Local Rule 11-3(b), which

22 states that an applicant is ineligible if she (1) resides in the State of California or (2) is regularly

23 engaged in the practice of law in the State of California.

24
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27 Dated: April 3, 2007.
WILLIAM ALSUP
28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com