Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
the
United
Stated
until
1910
(Goldstein
92)
(Cott
13-5).
The
history
of
feminism
is
divided
into
three
waves,
known
as
the
first,
second,
and
third.
First-wave
feminism
began
in
the
nineteenth
century
and
continued
through
the
early
twentieth
century
in
the
United
States.
This
movement
was
focused
primarily
around
womens
suffrage
and
gaining
women
more
political
power,
though
it
also
concerned
itself
around
marriage
and
parenting
rights
for
women
(Freedman
464).
Second-wave
feminism,
by
contrast,
concentrated
on
the
linkage
of
womens
cultural
and
political
inequalities,
and
the
movement
encouraged
women
throughout
the
mid-twentieth
century
to
reexamine
the
ways
in
which
they
lived
their
personal
lives
as
evidence
of
sexist
power
structures
within
society
(Echols
416).
The
slogan
The
Personal
is
Political,
coined
by
activist
and
author
Carol
Hanisch,
became
the
definition
of
the
second
wave
(Hanisch).
Third-wave
feminism,
which
began
in
the
United
States
in
the
1990s
and
continues
to
the
present
day,
focuses
on
responding
to
the
perceived
failures
and
the
backlash
against
the
second
wave.
The
third-wave
concentrates
itself
on
promoting
female
sexuality
as
a
means
of
female
empowerment,
as
well
as
stimulating
intersectionality
within
the
movement
as
a
means
of
giving
more
voice
to
colored
and
queer
women
(Cameron).
Though
third-wave
feminism,
the
feminism
that
is
prominent
in
todays
society,
seems
to
focus
on
the
microcosms
within
the
movement,
it
is
important
to
note
that
feminists
today
are
still
advocating
for
basic
gender
equality
as
much
as
the
feminists
of
the
first
and
second
waves.
Pop
music
received
its
legitimacy
in
1926
when
the
first
recorded
use
of
the
term
pop
song
occurred
(History
of
Pop
Music
Timeline).
In
this
case,
the
term
meant
that
a
piece
of
music
had
popular
appeal,
which
solidified
the
general
perception
of
the
genre
going
forward
(History
of
Pop
Music
Timeline).
Major
pop
stars,
however,
did
not
start
appearing
in
regular
culture
until
the
1930s
and
40s.
Frank
Sinatra,
who
is
well-known
for
his
fan
base
consisting
of
screaming
teenage
female
fans,
is
argued
to
be
the
first
modern
pop
star
in
the
same
vein
as
boy
bands
(History
of
Pop
Music
Timeline).
Pop
as
a
mobile
music
genre
did
not
take
shape
until
1952,
when
pop
music
charts
began
appearing
in
Billboard
magazine
alongside
charts
of
other
genres
(History
of
Pop
Music
Timeline).
This
mobilization
is
credited
to
teenagers
finding
their
music
genre,
and
thus
solidified
another
facet
of
pop
music
characterizationits
definition
as
music
for
teens
(History
of
Pop
Music
Timeline).
The
advent
of
the
Beatles,
though
few
are
wont
to
admit
it,
was
the
beginning
of
boy
bands
in
popular
society.
The
Beatles
produced
an
era
of
pop
where
artists
were
expected
to
write
their
own
material,
and
the
public
opinion
of
manufactured
starsbetter
known
as
artists
who
ranged
from
not
writing
their
own
material
to
having
a
pretty
face
and
minimal
talentcontinued
to
decline,
resulting
in
shortened
careers
for
many
pop
artists
(History
of
Pop
Music
Timeline).
In
the
1990s,
though,
boy
bands
came
back
in
full
force
and
took
over
the
genre
despite
being
regarded
as
the
ultimate
in
manufactured
acts
(History
of
Pop
Music
Timeline).
This
era
gave
way
to
pop
music
groups
like
Take
That,
Backstreet
Boys,
and
N
Sync,
groups
who
cater
to
mainly
female
fan
bases
and
dominated
the
genre
so
much
so
that
female
groups
or
female
solo
artists
were
pushed
to
the
sidelines.
Though
the
general
consensus
is
that
the
boy
band
era
came
and
went
in
the
90s,
the
reunion
of
N
Sync,
Backstreet
Boys,
and
New
Kids
on
the
Block
in
late
2000s,
combined
with
the
advent
of
One
Direction
in
2010,
points
toward
the
recent
takeover
evident
in
2014.
After
understanding
the
origins
of
both
the
pop
music
genre
and
feminism
within
society,
it
becomes
easier
to
explore
the
linkage
between
the
two
subjects.
Though
pop
music
can
be
explored
through
feminism
by
examining
the
introduction
and
prominence
of
female
pop
artists
throughout
the
genre,
the
two
can
also
be
examined
simultaneously
through
the
pop
artists
that
are
directly
marketed
to
teenage
female
fansboy
bands.
Boy
bands
within
the
pop
genre
are
considered
among
the
most
slickly
produced
and
marketed
youth/music
industry
products
of
general
culture,
with
their
point
of
origin
located
within
the
music
industry
itself
rather
than
as
an
organic
coming-together
of
musicians
(Wald).
As
exemplified
by
the
creation
of
One
Direction,
whose
five
members
were
placed
into
a
group
by
Simon
Cowell
on
the
seventh
season
of
the
X
Factor
(a
television
pop
singing
competition
in
the
United
Kingdom)
when
the
members
did
not
advance
through
the
show
as
solo
performers,
most
boy
bands
find
their
origins
from
record
label
heads
or
music
industry
producers
who
are
attempting
to
tap
into
the
cash
flow
of
a
teenage
female
fan
base
(One
Direction:
This
Is
Us).
This
lacking
of
paying
their
dues
within
the
music
industrymeaning
a
band
beginning
in
humble
origins,
such
as
parents
garages,
and
working
up
through
playing
in
gritty
clubs
until
the
band
has
a
name
for
itselfhas
resulted
in
a
cultural
stigmatization
of
boy
bands
as
musical
groups,
but
has
also
carried
over
into
the
cultural
stigmatization
of
boy
band
fans
(Wald).
In
this
sense,
boy
bands
and
boy
band
fans
are
lumped
together
under
the
condescending
umbrella
of
contrived
and
participate
in
an
industry
and
culture
that
continually
devalues
not
only
their
prominence
but
also
their
existence.
In
a
survey
of
100
students
attending
James
Madison
University,
80%
of
the
participants
responded
yes
to
questions
such
as
do
you
consider
boy
bands
to
be
girl
music?
and
do
you
think
less
of
people
who
admit
they
are
fans
of
bands
like
One
Direction?
(Slattery).
Though
the
vocabularies
of
college-aged
students
are
not
replete
with
words
like
artificial
and
degradation,
these
terms
do
come
to
mind
when
considering
the
results
of
the
survey.
This
small
sample
size
is
indicative
of
current
cultures
tendency
to
devalue
the
music
catered
toward
and
consumed
by
teenage
girls
as
facilitated
by
a
gendered
hierarchy
of
high
and
low
popular
culture,
with
boy
bands
falling
on
the
low
end
(Wald).
The
current
societal
culture,
rife
with
misogyny,
has
created
this
high/low
hierarchy
that
has
become
based
around
the
cultural
belief
that
girls
desires
are
notions
offickleness,
superficiality,
and
aesthetic
bankruptcy
of
the
material
forms
(Wald).
Boy
bands,
in
turn,
are
forced
to
create
a
feminized
masculinity
where
their
performances
are
characterized
by
the
members
playing
with
the
codes
of
masculinity
as
a
way
to
present
themselves
specifically
to
and
for
girls
pleasure
(Wald).
This
forced
bastardization
of
what
society
deems
to
be
normal
masculinity,
and
the
subsequent
devaluation
of
the
boy
bands
and
their
teenage
girl
fan
base
because
of
these
acts,
creates
a
sort
of
cycle
that
inevitably
reinforces
the
implicit
sexism
of
current
culture.
Therefore,
it
is
easy
for
popular
culture
to
write
off
female
fans
of
bands
specifically
created
and
catered
toward
them
as
nothing
more
than
a
temporary
annoyance
that
will
disappear
when
the
boy
band
fad
inevitably
does.
However,
this
discussion
on
boy
bands
as
music
catered
specifically
toward
teenage
female
fans
sheds
light
on
the
cultural
imagination
of
girls
as
consumers,
citizens,
and
subjects
(Wald).
Not
only
does
this
participation
in
a
large-scale
fandom
give
these
teenage
girls
a
means
of
cultural
visibility,
it
also
gives
them
a
shared
social
identity
within
which
they
can
develop
(Wald).
This
is
a
primary
example
of
the
idea
of
social
musical
practices,
where
social
positionings
and
discursive
frameworks
shape
how
people
experience,
engage
with
and
talk
about
music
(Williams).
Through
their
connection
to
these
boy
bands
and
their
shared
positioning
at
the
low
end
of
the
social
musical
hierarchy,
these
teenage
girls
have
cultivated
a
sense
of
community
within
which
they
have
means
to
develop
and
explore
their
sexuality
and
their
identity
on
both
a
personal
and
public
level.
The
examples
of
the
benefits
of
fandom
come
from
personal
observations
of
and
interactions
within
the
One
Direction
fandom.
As
the
majority
of
fandom
communications
occur
online,
the
widespread
social
media
developments
enable
fandom
expression
to
take
on
a
multitude
of
forms.
These
expressions
range
from
artistic
depictions
of
the
One
Direction
members
to
fan
fiction
stories,
which
are
fictional
stories
about
the
band
members
written
by
fandom
members,
to
feminist
discourses
regarding
the
lyrical
content
of
the
songs.
As
these
mediums
are
shared
throughout
the
fandom,
the
girls
not
only
find
a
creative
outlet
through
which
to
hone
their
personal
talents
(as
writers,
artists,
discussion
leaders,
and
political
activists),
but
also
create
a
sense
of
identity
for
themselves
within
a
community.
Despite
widespread
ridicule
from
general
society,
these
girls
have
fashioned
a
safe
space
for
growth
and
exploration
out
of
manufactured
origins
and
over-saturated
lyricism,
and
are
not
simply
complacent
with
their
residency
as
an
annoying
fad
within
social
culture,
but
thriving
within
this
positioning.
This
online
mobilization
has
not
only
created
a
widespread
web
of
girls
with
like
interests,
but
it
has
also
catapulted
One
Direction
to
international
fame
and
therefore
solidified
the
fandom
as
an
integral
part
of
shaping
the
way
people
socialize
around
music.
Though
critics
diminish
boy
band
fandom
as
a
fair-weather
annoyance,
the
girls
continually
succeed
in
taking
a
relatively
small
platform
and
creating
a
sense
of
community
for
themselves
to
develop
and
explore.
The
girls
take
part
in
a
forum
where
discussions
can
be
fostered
from
a
shared
interest.
Their
fandom
turns
into
a
stepping-stone
for
social
and
political
involvement,
such
as
advocacy
for
feminism
and
LGBTQ
equality.
In
spite
of
patronizing,
mocking
condescension
from
general
society,
these
teenage
girls
not
only
continue
to
catapult
boy
bands
like
One
Direction
to
international
fame,
but
also
bring
themselves
along
for
the
ride
as
more
and
more
news
outlets
discuss
the
legitimacy
and
relevancy
of
female
fans.
In
considering
this,
it
can
be
said
that
teenage
girls
are
one
of
the
largest
mobilizing
forces
in
society,
which
is
quite
a
feat
considering
the
still-prevalent
misogyny
permeating
current
culture.
Works
Cited
Cameron,
Douglas.
Cultural
Strategy.
Oxford
University
Press,
2010.
Web.
Cott,
Nancy
F.
The
Grounding
of
Modern
Feminism.
New
Haven:
Yale
University
Press,
1987.
13-5.
Web.
Echols,
Alice.
Daring
to
Be
Bad:
Radical
Feminism
in
America,
1967-1975.
Minneapolis:
University
of
Minnesota
Press,
1989.
416.
Web.
Freedman,
Estelle
B.
No
Turning
Back:
the
History
of
Feminism
and
the
Future
of
Women.
Ballantine
Books,
2003.
464.
Web.
Goldstein,
Leslie
F.
Early
Feminist
Themes
in
French
Utopian
Socialism:
The
St.
Simonians
and
Fourier.
Journal
of
the
History
of
Ideas.
1982.
Vol.
43,
No.
1.
Hanisch,
Carol.
New
Intro
to
The
Personal
is
PoliticalSecond
Wave
and
Beyond.
The
Personal
is
Political.
1
January
2006.
Web.
History
of
Pop
Music
Timeline.
Types
of
Music.
MediaGrupa,
2012.
Web.
One
Direction:
This
Is
Us.
Dir.
Morgan
Spurlock.
TriStar
Pictures,
2013.
Film.
Slattery,
Julia.
General
Perception
of
Boy
Bands
and
Boy
Band
Fan
Bases.
Survey.
19
March
2014.
Wald,
Gayle.
I
Want
It
That
Way:
Teenybopper
Music
and
the
Girling
of
Boy
Bands.
Genders
Online
Journal.
Genders
Journal,
2002.
Web.
Williams,
Christina.
Does
It
Really
Matter?
Young
People
and
Popular
Music.
Cambridge
Journals
Online.
Cambridge
University,
May
2001.
Web.