0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
18 Ansichten1 Seite
A single point mutation has been identified in the genome of E. Coli. A t test was performed to show that the first hypothesis was proven. In the second hypothesis, error in terms of DNA Sequencing may have appeared and an incorrect reading may have given a false diagnosis.
A single point mutation has been identified in the genome of E. Coli. A t test was performed to show that the first hypothesis was proven. In the second hypothesis, error in terms of DNA Sequencing may have appeared and an incorrect reading may have given a false diagnosis.
A single point mutation has been identified in the genome of E. Coli. A t test was performed to show that the first hypothesis was proven. In the second hypothesis, error in terms of DNA Sequencing may have appeared and an incorrect reading may have given a false diagnosis.
TSA plates/Rifampicin plates 40 petri dish 5g NaCl 5g Tryptone 2.5g yeast extract 7.5g Agar Deionized H2O Rifampicin Pipettes Stir Rod Erlenmeyer flask (500 ml) Hot Plate PBS Test Tube Racks Test Tubes Light Microscope
Selecting and lysing a mutant colony
The colonies from the precious materials list Inoculation Loops 10 micro vials 50 l Test Tubes Test Tube Racks Pipetteman 10 l 40 Pipette Tips 10 l Thermocycling and PCR of the mutant Bacteria Cultures from previous step 5l mixed rpo1240F and rpo2226R primers 20, 10 ml test tubes Pipetteman 10 l 40 Pipette Tips 10 l 2 test tube racks 50 mL PBS Saline Solution Forceps 1 mL Taq polymerase Lyse-N-Go extraction reagent
Gel electrophoresis and ExoSAP
Gel electrophoresis 1% Agarose Gel Microvials 10 l PCR Samples 10% ExoSap 40 Pipette Tops 10 l 10 Pipetteman 10 l PBS Electrodes Voltage Source Casting Trays (Ethidium Bromide)EtBr 0.5g/m Microwave Sequencing A computer Sequencher Data Site Excel Sheet A camera
Procedure & Method
Error & Conclusion
Error Analysis: When average counts were being taken from the first hypothesis, it is evident that the colony count do not meet expected countable amounts of 30-300 Colonies. Some of the higher dilutions were underrepresented and this may lead to false statistics. This would be a problem since a t test was performed to show that the first hypothesis was proven. In the second hypothesis, error in terms of DNA Sequencing may have appeared and an incorrect reading may have given a false diagnosis, however with the data worked with, it was found that it was a single point mutation. Discoveries of this in the past may also prove it to be correct that it is through a single point mutation and not through other types. Conclusion: In the end of the experiment, it can be concluded that the antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli on the Rifampicin is caused by a single point mutation. Because of this mutation, the transcription factors and the RNA Polymerase is able to continue on because it the rifampicin no longer fits in the subunit groove of the bacterial DNA. Further conclusions from this in vitro method shows that the preserved DA region remains true, the mutation rate cannot be high around this area as the RNA Polymerase is an essential enzyme for the bacteria. Also, reproductive stress is evident from the results gathered from the first part in that even though the bacteria survived, the rate of reproduction seemed to have slowed down in the environment