Solomons Snap Judgements

Your name: Megan Brianne White

Partners name: Cecilia Carbone
Partners Subject: Over population in animal shelters
The person has 3 sources of the 8 required

Each source is clearly related or relevant to the topic stated above? If yes, state
which is best: if no, state which arent

Yes, the Help the Helpless, Give a Home was best

Each source is clearly owned (identify writer/editor/sponsor)? If yes, which is most

clearly owned; if no state which arent

Yes, Exploring the Bond, is most clearly owned

Each sources owner/sponsor has clear credentials? If yes, state the best example of
this; if no, state which dont

Yes, Exploring the Bond, is the best example

Each source is fairly recent? If yes, which is most recent; if no, state which is oldest

For the most part, Help the Helpless, Give a Home, is the most recent

Each source is viable as academically suitable content? If yes, which is strongest; if

no, state which arent and why

Yes, This I believe is, the strongest

Which source has the highest, overall quality? Why?

Exploring the Bond, because it has the most information

Which source is the pro viewpoint? What makes this source special/ standout?

All of these sources are pro viewpoints

Which source is the con viewpoint? What makes this source special/ standout?

None of the sources I looked over had a con viewpoint

Overall, you consider these sources to be of Poor, Average, Good, Excellent, or

Superior Quality? Why?

Excellent, great information

I think, solely on these sources, he/she would earn a grade of an A, because

They have all the requirements

Does your partner agree or disagree with this evaluation? Elaborate with the
response.

Yes my partner agreed, we both felt she did a great job finding sources and all
of them had valid information