0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
11 Ansichten3 Seiten
Michael pronin says he was hooked on debate as a freshman. He says he began doing original research and compiling his own cases. Pronin: "debate is a way of life"
Michael pronin says he was hooked on debate as a freshman. He says he began doing original research and compiling his own cases. Pronin: "debate is a way of life"
Michael pronin says he was hooked on debate as a freshman. He says he began doing original research and compiling his own cases. Pronin: "debate is a way of life"
I remember my freshman year when my best friend dragged me into
my first debate team meeting, and despite my initial resistance, I was hooked. At the time, the team barely traveled and wasnt all that serious. My freshman schedule would see around six local tournaments in a league that housed about twelve schools in my area, all of which brought relatively new and unexposed debaters. Even against such modest competition, I didnt manage to win a single round. With little guidance, I went into each round unprepared and my results reflected my level of preparation. The following year, I found myself doing the same thing on the way to yet another local league tournament, when a new coach, Mr. Berdnik, called me to the front of the bus and picked out some evidence for me to use. Shortly thereafter, he made the decision to switch my event to a more involved and competitive form. Still, I wasnt ready to fully commit to debate, and my sophomore season, much like my freshman season, was unimpressive.
After a disappointing couple of losses at the beginning of my junior
year, I finally realized that debate required a lot more than just showing up and speaking in front of a judge. I began doing original research and compiling my own cases; no longer reliant on the work of others. I continued to improve, and before I knew it, I was getting better results at tournaments. Doing debate work a couple hours a week turned into a few hours a night. My efforts showed, as I qualified to and compiled a 4-1 record at Catholic Nationals. But still I was hungry. The following year, I set my sights even higher. Before I knew it, I was working on debate almost any free second I had. I wasnt writing just one case for each side of the resolution, but was instead writing 3 or 4 on each side, and upwards of 10 versions of each, always believing that it could be better. After every tournament, I would go home and write down all of the arguments that I heard, and then research to find the best possible responses so I would be in a better position to respond the following time I would hear the argument. Towards the end of the season, I had won numerous tournaments, including a couple multi-state events. I prepared harder than ever for states, but was disappointed when I lost in the quarterfinal round; a round that I believe I could have won. This motivated me to do even more. I won my catholic league district tournament and then won my National Speech and Debate Association district tournament, meaning I was qualified to both national tournaments, the latter being the bigger one.
I spent the time between states and catholic nationals preparing
upwards of 5 hours a day. Again, I was disappointed with a loss in the round of 16, but I didnt let it knock me down. I persisted and worked my tail off to prepare for the NSDA National tournament, a mere three weeks away. I would head to the library every day after school, and read until closing time. I practiced every day, even on weekends. I wrote 20 versions of each case, and compiled a brief of evidence 100 pages thick for both sides, filled with responses to arguments. When it was all said and done, I finished 8th in the country, making it all the way to the 13th round. I believe that my effort proves that persistence and determination are omnipotent and are the only way to achieve success.