Sie sind auf Seite 1von 136

Enantioselective Organocatalysis: A Valuable Strategy for Chemical Synthesis

The rapid growth of organocatalysis over the

Organocatalysis

last 10 years was fueled by the development


of a small number of generic activation modes

Iminium catalysis
O

Im

Enamine catalysis

En

H-bond catalysis

Me

Me

Me

N
Ph

Me

Me

HO2C

S
N

~50 new reactions


with Jorgensen, K. A.

~20 new reactions


Hajos-Wiechert
Barbas-List

H
O

R
R

Me
N

Me

H+

~30 new reactions


JacobsenAkiyama

! Last 10 years, organocatalysis has delivered many new asymmetric transforms (~150-200)
! These 3 activation modes cover a large portion of the organocatalysis landscape

Enantioselective Organocatalysis: A Valuable Strategy for Chemical Synthesis


The rapid growth of organocatalysis over the

Organocatalysis

last 10 years was fueled by the development


of a small number of generic activation modes

Iminium catalysis
O

Im

Enamine catalysis

En

H-bond catalysis

Me

Me

Me

N
Ph

Me

Me

HO2C

S
N

~50 new reactions


with Jorgensen, K. A.

~20 new reactions


Hajos-Wiechert
Barbas-List

H
O

R
R

Me
N

Me

H+

~30 new reactions


JacobsenAkiyama

! Last 10 years, organocatalysis has delivered many new asymmetric transforms (~150-200)
! These 3 activation modes cover a large portion of the organocatalysis landscape

Enantioselective Organocatalysis: A Valuable Strategy for Chemical Synthesis


The rapid growth of organocatalysis over the

Organocatalysis

last 10 years was fueled by the development


of a small number of generic activation modes

Iminium catalysis
O

Im

Enamine catalysis

En

H-bond catalysis

Me

Me

Me

N
Ph

Me

Me

HO2C

S
N

~50 new reactions


with Jorgensen, K. A.

~20 new reactions


Hajos-Wiechert
Barbas-List

H
O

R
R

Me
N

Me

H+

~30 new reactions


JacobsenAkiyama

! Last 10 years, organocatalysis has delivered many new asymmetric transforms (~150-200)
! These 3 activation modes cover a large portion of the organocatalysis landscape

Enantioselective Organocatalysis: A Valuable Strategy for Chemical Synthesis


The rapid growth of organocatalysis over the

Organocatalysis

last 10 years was fueled by the development


of a small number of generic activation modes

Iminium catalysis
O

Im

Enamine catalysis

En

H-bond catalysis

Me

Me

Me

N
Ph

Me

Me

HO2C

S
N

~50 new reactions


with Jorgensen, K. A.

~20 new reactions


Hajos-Wiechert
Barbas-List

H
O

R
R

Me
N

Me

H+

~30 new reactions


JacobsenAkiyama

! Last 10 years, organocatalysis has delivered many new asymmetric transforms (~150-200)
! These 3 activation modes cover a large portion of the organocatalysis landscape

Enantioselective Organocatalysis: A Valuable Strategy for Chemical Synthesis


The rapid growth of organocatalysis over the

Organocatalysis

last 10 years was fueled by the development


of a small number of generic activation modes

Iminium catalysis
O

Im

Enamine catalysis

En

H-bond catalysis

Me

Me

Me

N
Ph

Me

Me

HO2C

S
N

~50 new reactions


with Jorgensen, K. A.

~20 new reactions


Hajos-Wiechert
Barbas-List

H
O

R
R

Me
N

Me

H+

~30 new reactions


JacobsenAkiyama

! Last 10 years, organocatalysis has delivered many new asymmetric transforms (~150-200)
! These 3 activation modes cover a large portion of the organocatalysis landscape

Enantioselective Organocatalysis: A Valuable Strategy for Chemical Synthesis


The rapid growth of organocatalysis over the

Organocatalysis

last 10 years was fueled by the development


of a small number of generic activation modes

Iminium catalysis
O

Im

Enamine catalysis

En

H-bond catalysis

Me

Me

Me

N
Ph

Me

Me

HO2C

S
N

~50 new reactions


with Jorgensen, K. A.

~20 new reactions


Hajos-Wiechert
Barbas-List

H
O

R
R

Me
N

Me

H+

~30 new reactions


JacobsenAkiyama

! Last 10 years, organocatalysis has delivered many new asymmetric transforms (~150-200)
! These 3 activation modes cover a large portion of the organocatalysis landscape

Organometallic Catalysis: Few Activation Concepts

!-bond insertion

!-bond insertion

CC bond coupling

CN, S, O coupling

Suzuki
Negishi
Stille
Kumada
Fu

Lewis acid catalysis

Yates
La
Corey
Evans
Shibasaki
Mukaiyama

Buchwald
Hartwig

Olefin metathesis

Grubbs
Schrock
Hoveyda
Furstner

Ru

Many Powerful Reactions

"-bond insertion

Noyori
Toste
Heck
Feringa
Krische

"

Atom transfer catalysis

Sharpless
Jacobsen
Shi
Doyle

At

! Relatively few activation modes have resulted in literally thousands of new chemical reactions

Relatively Few Catalysis Activation Concepts

Many Powerful Reactions

Instead of focusing completely on the invention of individual catalytic reactions


using long-established activation modes

Why don't we focus on the invention of new, useful catalytic activation modes?

Design of an entirely new catalyst activation mode is extremely challenging

So

OrganoSOMO catalysis

+ e

Photoredox organocatalysis

! Two new modes of catalyst activation using organocatalysts

Relatively Few Catalysis Activation Concepts

Many Powerful Reactions

Instead of focusing completely on the invention of individual catalytic reactions


using long-established activation modes

Why don't we focus on the invention of new, useful catalytic activation modes?

Design of an entirely new catalyst activation mode is extremely challenging

So

OrganoSOMO catalysis

+ e

Photoredox organocatalysis

! Two new modes of catalyst activation using organocatalysts

Relatively Few Catalysis Activation Concepts

Many Powerful Reactions

Instead of focusing completely on the invention of individual catalytic reactions


using long-established activation modes

Why don't we focus on the invention of new, useful catalytic activation modes?

Design of an entirely new catalyst activation mode is extremely challenging

So

OrganoSOMO catalysis

+ e

Photoredox organocatalysis

! Two new modes of catalyst activation using organocatalysts

Relatively Few Catalysis Activation Concepts

Many Powerful Reactions

Instead of focusing completely on the invention of individual catalytic reactions


using long-established activation modes

Why don't we focus on the invention of new, useful catalytic activation modes?

Design of an entirely new catalyst activation mode is extremely challenging

So

OrganoSOMO catalysis

+ e

Photoredox organocatalysis

! Two new modes of catalyst activation using organocatalysts

Relatively Few Catalysis Activation Concepts

Many Powerful Reactions

So+ e

catalysis
OrganoSOMO
organocatalysis
Photoredox
!!AAnew
newmode
modeofoforganocatalytic
organocatalyticactivation
activation

Holy Grails in Asymmetric Catalysis: Asymmetric !-Carbonyl Alyklation

catalyst
Me

alkylBr

O
Me
alkyl

Holy Grails in Asymmetric Catalysis: Enolate Alyklation


! Chiral Auxiliary Controlled 1982, Evans, Meyers

O
O

O
N

Me

LDA;
O

BnBr
Ph

93% yield

Me

120:1 dr

Bn

Me

Ph

Me

! Catalytic Ketone Variant: Abby Doyle, Eric Jacobsen

OSnBu3

5 mol% cat

Me

Cr

Me

t-Bu

Br

t-Bu

84% yield
94% ee

N
Cl O

t-Bu

t-Bu

salen catalyst

! O'Donnell, Corey and Maruoka: glycine imine alkylation via PTC (seminal contributions )
! Fu has also introduced an elegant enantioselective alkyl-halide alkylation reaction

Holy Grails in Asymmetric Catalysis: Enolate Alyklation


! Chiral Auxiliary Controlled 1982, Evans, Meyers

O
O

O
N

Me

LDA;
O

BnBr
Ph

93% yield

Me

120:1 dr

Bn

Me

Ph

Me

! Catalytic Ketone Variant: Abby Doyle, Eric Jacobsen

OSnBu3

5 mol% cat

Me

Cr

Me

t-Bu

Br

t-Bu

84% yield
94% ee

N
Cl O

t-Bu

t-Bu

salen catalyst

! O'Donnell, Corey and Maruoka: glycine imine alkylation via PTC (seminal contributions )
! Fu has also introduced an elegant enantioselective alkyl-halide alkylation reaction

Holy Grails in Asymmetric Catalysis: Enolate Alyklation


! Chiral Auxiliary Controlled 1982, Evans, Meyers

O
O

O
N

Me

LDA;
O

BnBr
Ph

93% yield

Me

120:1 dr

Bn

Me

Ph

Me

! Catalytic Ketone Variant: Abby Doyle, Eric Jacobsen

OSnBu3

5 mol% cat

Me

Cr

Me

t-Bu

Br

t-Bu

84% yield
94% ee

N
Cl O

t-Bu

t-Bu

salen catalyst

! O'Donnell, Corey and Maruoka: glycine imine alkylation via PTC (seminal contributions )
! Fu has also introduced an elegant enantioselective alkyl-halide alkylation reaction

Can we use Enamine Catalysis to Solve Asymmetric Catalytic Carbonyl Alkylation


! Teresa Beeson: 3rd Year Graduate Student

! Initial idea: to perform asymmetric alkylation on aldehydes

N
H

aldehyde

enamine
catalyst

or
H

MeI or

BnBr

Me

no alkylation product

! Only products of aldehyde self dimerization were observed

Can we use Enamine Catalysis to Solve Asymmetric Catalytic Carbonyl Alkylation


! Teresa Beeson: 3rd Year Graduate Student

! Initial idea: to perform asymmetric alkylation on aldehydes

N
H

aldehyde

enamine
catalyst

or
H

MeI or

BnBr

Me

no alkylation product

! Only products of aldehyde self dimerization were observed

Inherent Problems for Enamine Catalysis and Asymmetric Catalytic Alkylation


! Potential Issues for Enantioselective Alkylation using Enamine Catalysis

H
O

MeI
R

N
H

insufficient e- density
to react with

enamine
catalyst

aldehyde

sp3-electrophile

in comparison to sp2-aldehyde

H
O

OH

H
R

O+

aldehyde-aldehyde
aldol dominates

sufficient e- density
to react with
sp2-aldehyde

! Intramolecular aldehyde alkylation can be accomplished (List and coworkers)

Designing a New Organocatalytic Catalysis Concept: SOMO Catalysis

O
N

not

H
R

H
R

Trying to force a reaction to work within the confines


of a known catalysis concept or activation mode
(square peg, round hole)

Designing a New Organocatalytic Catalysis Concept: SOMO Catalysis

Reface

Reface

activated

activated

iminium catalysis
LUMOactivation
O

Me
N

+2

+
Me
R

Me

somo catalysis
SOMOactivation

Me

Me
N

Me

Me

N
Ph

enamine catalysis
HOMOactivation

N
Ph

Me
R

Me

Me

[oxid]

N
Ph

Me

Me

! Can we utilize the one electron species that lies between iminium and enamine catalysis

Designing a New Organocatalytic Catalysis Concept: SOMO Catalysis

Reface

Reface

activated

activated

iminium catalysis
LUMOactivation
O

Me
N

+2

+
Me
R

Me

somo catalysis
SOMOactivation

Me

Me
N

Me

Me

N
Ph

enamine catalysis
HOMOactivation

N
Ph

Me
R

Me

Me

[oxid]

N
Ph

Me

Me

! Can we utilize the one electron species that lies between iminium and enamine catalysis

Designing a New Organocatalytic Catalysis Concept: SOMO Catalysis

Reface

Reface

activated

activated

iminium catalysis
LUMOactivation
O

Me
N

+2

+
Me
R

Me

somo catalysis
SOMOactivation

Me

Me
N

Me

Me

N
Ph

enamine catalysis
HOMOactivation

N
Ph

Me
R

Me

Me

[oxid]

N
Ph

Me

Me

! Can we utilize the one electron species that lies between iminium and enamine catalysis

Designing a New Organocatalytic Catalysis Concept: SOMO Catalysis

Reface

Reface

activated

activated

iminium catalysis
LUMOactivation
O

Me
N

+2

+
Me
R

Me

somo catalysis
SOMOactivation

Me

Me
N

Me

Me

N
Ph

enamine catalysis
HOMOactivation

N
Ph

Me
R

Me

Me

[oxid]

N
Ph

Me

Me

! Can we utilize the one electron species that lies between iminium and enamine catalysis

Designing a New Organocatalytic Catalysis Concept: SOMO Catalysis

Reface

Reface

activated

activated

iminium catalysis
LUMOactivation
O

Me
N

+2

+
Me
R

Me

somo catalysis
SOMOactivation

Me

Me
N

Me

Me

N
Ph

enamine catalysis
HOMOactivation

N
Ph

Me
R

Me

Me

[oxid]

N
Ph

Me

Me

! Can we utilize the one electron species that lies between iminium and enamine catalysis

SOMO Catalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

Ph

N
H

Me

Me

catalyst

substrate

oxidant

CAN

Br

not electrophile
O

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

SOMO species
O
SiMe3

with SOMOphile
!-allyl aldehydes

SOMO Catalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

Ph

N
H

Me

Me

catalyst

substrate

oxidant

CAN

Br

not electrophile
O

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

SOMO species
O
SiMe3

with SOMOphile
!-allyl aldehydes

SOMO Catalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

Ph

N
H

Me

Me

catalyst

substrate

oxidant

CAN

Br

not electrophile
O

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

SOMO species
O
SiMe3

with SOMOphile
!-allyl aldehydes

SOMO Catalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

Ph

N
H

Me

Me

catalyst

substrate

oxidant

CAN

Br

not electrophile
O

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

SOMO species
O
SiMe3

with SOMOphile
!-allyl aldehydes

SOMO Catalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

Ph

N
H

Me

Me

catalyst

substrate

oxidant

CAN

Br

not electrophile
O

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

SOMO species
O
SiMe3

with SOMOphile
!-allyl aldehydes

SOMO Catalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me

Me

Ph

Me

Me

catalyst

substrate

enantiopure
!-aryl aldehydes

N
H

oxidant

CAN

Ph

enantiopure
1,4-keto-aldehydes

O
O

Me
N

Me
N
Ph

Me

Me

enantiopure
ring formation

enantiopure
!"vinylation

SOMO species
O
O
H
H
OR

enantiopure
!-oxy aldehydes

!-allyl aldehydes

Designing a New Organocatalytic Catalysis Concept: SOMO Catalysis


SOMO catalysis concept

substrate

catalyst

oxidant

R
N
H HCl

SOMOactivation

1 e

Why will there be selective oxidation: oxidation potentials

N
N
H

butanal

pyrrolidine

1-(but-1-enyl)pyrrolidine

IP = 9.84 eV

IP = 8.8 eV

IP = 7.24 eV

Oxidant should selectively reract with transient enamine to generate radical iminium cation

Designing a New Organocatalytic Catalysis Concept: SOMO Catalysis


SOMO catalysis concept

substrate

catalyst

oxidant

R
N
H HCl

SOMOactivation

1 e

Why will there be selective oxidation: oxidation potentials

N
N
H

butanal

pyrrolidine

1-(but-1-enyl)pyrrolidine

IP = 9.84 eV

IP = 8.8 eV

IP = 7.24 eV

Oxidant should selectively reract with transient enamine to generate radical iminium cation

Designing a New Organocatalytic Catalysis Concept: SOMO Catalysis


SOMO catalysis concept

substrate

catalyst
R

oxidant

R
N
H HCl

1 e

SOMOactivation

Requirements for enantioselectivity:


Iminium geometry control
!-carbon radical geometry control

Me
N

Me

+
Ph

substrate

N
H

Me

CAN

Me

organocatalyst

oxidant

Reface
activated to
SOMO nucleophiles

Could this be a third general platform of induction for the imidazolidinone catalyst family

Studies to determine the utility of SOMO catalysis for aldehyde alkylation


10 mol%
Bn

O
TMS

aldehyde

allyl silane

Me
N
N
H

tBu

DME
2 eq CAN

OH

aldehyde aldol (undesired)

Studies to determine the utility of SOMO catalysis for aldehyde alkylation


10 mol%
Bn

O
TMS

aldehyde

allyl silane

Me
N
N
H

tBu

DME
2 eq CAN

Studies to determine the utility of SOMO catalysis for aldehyde alkylation


10 mol%
Bn

O
TMS

aldehyde

allyl silane

Me
N
N
H

tBu

DME
2 eq CAN

OH

aldehyde aldol (undesired)

Studies to determine the utility of SOMO catalysis for aldehyde alkylation


10 mol%
Bn

O
TMS

aldehyde

allyl silane

Me
N
N
H

tBu

DME
2 eq CAN

Studies to determine the utility of SOMO catalysis for aldehyde alkylation


O

10 mol%
Bn

N
H

TMS

aldehyde

Me
N

O
tBu

81% yield

91% ee

DME
2 eq CAN

allyl silane

!-alkylated aldehyde

! Varying the allylsilane and the aldehyde component


O

81% yield

88% yield

H
Me

91% ee

O
H

Me

91% ee

CO2Et

58% yield
94% ee

81% yield

O
Ph

87% yield

Ph

90% ee

90% ee

NBoc

70% yield
93% ee

with Beeson, Masstrachio, Hong, Ashton, Science, 2007, 316, 582

Studies to determine the utility of SOMO catalysis for aldehyde alkylation


O

10 mol%
Bn

N
H

TMS

aldehyde

Me
N

O
tBu

81% yield

91% ee

DME
2 eq CAN

allyl silane

!-alkylated aldehyde

! Varying the allylsilane and the aldehyde component


O

81% yield

88% yield

H
Me

91% ee

O
H

Me

91% ee

CO2Et

58% yield
94% ee

81% yield

O
Ph

87% yield

Ph

90% ee

90% ee

NBoc

70% yield
93% ee

with Beeson, Masstrachio, Hong, Ashton, Science, 2007, 316, 582

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation
O

! Mechanistic Evidence for radical cation


O

1e

radical-clock substrate
used to detect

radical-cation ?
O

Me
N

Ph

Ph

SOMO catalysis versus


enamine catalysis

N
H

N
But

1e

N
1e

cat A
Ph

stable

! Enamine catalysis
O
H

Ph

Ph

unstable

! SOMO catalysis

O
O

2 eq NCS

Ph

Cl

SiMe3

10% catalyst A
Ph

Ph

82 %

Ph

10% catalyst A
2 eq CAN

O2NO

Ph

68 %

Ph

not
observed

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation
O

! Mechanistic Evidence for radical cation


O

1e

radical-clock substrate
used to detect

radical-cation ?
O

Me
N

Ph

Ph

SOMO catalysis versus


enamine catalysis

N
H

N
But

1e

N
1e

cat A
Ph

stable

! Enamine catalysis
O
H

Ph

Ph

unstable

! SOMO catalysis

O
O

2 eq NCS

Ph

Cl

SiMe3

10% catalyst A
Ph

Ph

82 %

Ph

10% catalyst A
2 eq CAN

O2NO

Ph

68 %

Ph

not
observed

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation
O

! Mechanistic Evidence for radical cation


O

1e

radical-clock substrate
used to detect

radical-cation ?
O

Me
N

Ph

Ph

SOMO catalysis versus


enamine catalysis

N
H

N
But

1e

N
1e

cat A
Ph

stable

! Enamine catalysis
O
H

Ph

Ph

unstable

! SOMO catalysis

O
O

2 eq NCS

Ph

Cl

SiMe3

10% catalyst A
Ph

Ph

82 %

Ph

10% catalyst A
2 eq CAN

O2NO

Ph

68 %

Ph

not
observed

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation
O

! Mechanistic Evidence for radical cation


O

1e

radical-clock substrate
used to detect

radical-cation ?
O

Me
N

Ph

Ph

SOMO catalysis versus


enamine catalysis

N
H

N
But

1e

N
1e

cat A
Ph

stable

! Enamine catalysis
O
H

Ph

Ph

unstable

! SOMO catalysis

O
O

2 eq NCS

Ph

Cl

SiMe3

10% catalyst A
Ph

Ph

82 %

Ph

10% catalyst A
2 eq CAN

O2NO

Ph

68 %

Ph

not
observed

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation
O

! Mechanistic Evidence for radical cation


O

1e

radical-clock substrate
used to detect

radical-cation ?
O

Me
N

Ph

Ph

SOMO catalysis versus


enamine catalysis

N
H

N
But

1e

N
1e

cat A
Ph

stable

! Enamine catalysis
O
H

Ph

Ph

unstable

! SOMO catalysis

O
O

2 eq NCS

Ph

Cl

SiMe3

10% catalyst A
Ph

Ph

82 %

Ph

10% catalyst A
2 eq CAN

O2NO

Ph

68 %

Ph

not
observed

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation
O

1e

SiMe3

Me

Me

Ph

N
H

But

O
N
+

tBu

N
X-

Bn
R

cat A

SOMOphile addition?

SiMe3

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation
O

1e

SiMe3

Me

Me

Ph

N
H

But

O
N
+

tBu

N
X-

Bn
R

cat A

SOMOphile addition?

SiMe3

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation

! Test for SOMOphile


+

1e

SiMe3

MeO

Me

Me

Ph

OMe

But

tBu

N
X-

Bn

OMe

N
N
H

Ph

H
Ph

Ph

cat A
O

SiMe3

O
OMe

H
X

! Newcombe radical vs cation discrimination

B
MeO

Ph

Newcombe: to detect
2e !-addition pathway
versus
1e SOMOphile addition

Bu

10% catalyst A
2 eq CAN

Ph

olefin B

Ph

OMe

57%

O2NO

Ph

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation

! Test for SOMOphile


+

1e

SiMe3

MeO

Me

Me

Ph

OMe

But

tBu

N
X-

Bn

OMe

N
N
H

Ph

H
Ph

Ph

cat A
O

SiMe3

O
OMe

H
X

! Newcombe radical vs cation discrimination

B
MeO

Ph

Newcombe: to detect
2e !-addition pathway
versus
1e SOMOphile addition

Bu

10% catalyst A
2 eq CAN

Ph

olefin B

Ph

OMe

57%

O2NO

Ph

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation

! Test for SOMOphile


+

1e

SiMe3

MeO

Me

Me

Ph

OMe

But

tBu

N
X-

Bn

OMe

N
N
H

Ph

H
Ph

Ph

cat A
O

SiMe3

O
OMe

H
X

! Newcombe radical vs cation discrimination

B
MeO

Ph

Newcombe: to detect
2e !-addition pathway
versus
1e SOMOphile addition

Bu

10% catalyst A
2 eq CAN

Ph

olefin B

Ph

OMe

57%

O2NO

Ph

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation

! Test for SOMOphile


+

1e

SiMe3

MeO

Me

Me

Ph

OMe

But

tBu

N
X-

Bn

OMe

N
N
H

Ph

H
Ph

Ph

cat A
O

SiMe3

O
OMe

H
X

! Newcombe radical vs cation discrimination

B
MeO

Ph

Newcombe: to detect
2e !-addition pathway
versus
1e SOMOphile addition

Bu

10% catalyst A
2 eq CAN

Ph

olefin B

Ph

OMe

57%

O2NO

Ph

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! Test for second oxidation

! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation


O

1e

SiMe3

Me

Me

N
H

N
X-

% Yield

Bn

1.0

37%

1.5

61%

2.0

88%

3.0

87%

cat A
SiMe3
Me

Bu

tBu

But

10% catalyst A
X eq CAN

X eq CAN

Ph

H
Bu

SiMe3

O
N
+

tBu

N
X-

! Second oxidation is
important ?

Bn

1e

! !-silyl radical readily oxidized


1e

SiMe3

! This catalytic cycle would require 2 oxidation events

SiMe3

SiMe3

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! Test for second oxidation

! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation


O

1e

SiMe3

Me

Me

N
H

N
X-

% Yield

Bn

1.0

37%

1.5

61%

2.0

88%

3.0

87%

cat A
SiMe3
Me

Bu

tBu

But

10% catalyst A
X eq CAN

X eq CAN

Ph

H
Bu

SiMe3

O
N
+

tBu

N
X-

! Second oxidation is
important ?

Bn

1e

! !-silyl radical readily oxidized


1e

SiMe3

! This catalytic cycle would require 2 oxidation events

SiMe3

SiMe3

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! Test for second oxidation

! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation


O

1e

OO

SiMe3

Me

Me

N
H

N
X-

Bn
R

cat A
SiMe3
Me

Bu
Bu

%%Yield
Yield

tBu

But

10%
10%catalyst
catalystAA
XXeq
eqCAN
CAN

XXeq
eqCAN
CAN

Ph

HH

HH
Bu
Bu

OO

SiMe
SiMe
33

1.0
1.0
1.5
1.5

37%
37%
61%
61%

2.0
2.0
3.0
3.0

88%
88%
87%
87%

O
N
+

tBu

N
X-

! Second oxidation is
important ?

Bn

1e

! !-silyl radical readily oxidized


1e

SiMe3

! This catalytic cycle would require 2 oxidation events

SiMe3

SiMe3

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! Test for second oxidation

! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation


O

1e

OO

SiMe3

Me

Me

N
H

N
X-

Bn
R

cat A
SiMe3
Me

Bu
Bu

%%Yield
Yield

tBu

But

10%
10%catalyst
catalystAA
XXeq
eqCAN
CAN

XXeq
eqCAN
CAN

Ph

HH

HH
Bu
Bu

OO

SiMe
SiMe
33

1.0
1.0
1.5
1.5

37%
37%
61%
61%

2.0
2.0
3.0
3.0

88%
88%
87%
87%

O
N
+

tBu

N
X-

! Second oxidation is
important ?

Bn

1e

! !-silyl radical readily oxidized


1e

SiMe3

! This catalytic cycle would require 2 oxidation events

SiMe3

SiMe3

Enantioselective OrganoSOMO Catalysis: Possible Catalytic Cycle


! OrganoSOMO Aldehyde Alkylation
O

1e

SiMe3

O
N

Ph

N
H

Me

SOMO
cycle

Me

tBu

But

oxidant = 1e

cat A

O
N
N

X-

Bn
R

SiMe3

+ H 2O
SiMe3+

Me
+

tBu

N
X-

O
H

O
N
Bn

1e

SiMe3
R

! Second oxidation is
important
!-allyl aldehyde

! Loss of TMS-cation

SOMO activation strategy is useful for a variety of organocatalytic reactions


Aldehyde !-allylation

Aldehyde !-enolation

"-Nitro-!-alkyl aldehyde

Science 2007, 316, 582


ACIE 2010, asap (Flowers)

JACS 2007,129, 7004

JACS 2009, 131, 11332

91% ee

O
Ph

hex

hex

90% ee

NO2
Me

91% ee

hex

Aldehyde !-vinylation

Olefin carbo-oxidation

!-Chlorination/epoxidation

JACS 2008, 130, 398

JACS 2008, 130, 16494

ACIE 2009, 48, 5121

O
Ph

94% ee

hex

JACS 2010, 132, asap

Bn

H
S

Intramolecular !-arylation

90% ee

94% ee

ONO2

Polyene cyclization

JACS 2009, 131, 11640


JACS 2009, 131, 2086 (Nicolaou)
JACS 2010, 132, 6001 (Houk)

Ph

96% ee

hex

Cascade Cycloaddition

Ph

JACS 2010, 132, 5027


Me

Me
CN

OMe

98% ee

92% ee

Multiple Radical Bond Formations


R

Me

O
N

R
R

N
H

R R
R

Ar

2 x 1e oxidant
R
O

Direct and enantioselective access to steroid-type scaffolds

amine catalyst

1e, H+
amine catalyst

H2O, 1e
Me

What substituent
pattern will favor
polycyclization?

N
N

N
Ar

Ar

R R
R

What oxidant favors


a long-lived radical
for polycyclization?

Me

R R
R

Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Multiple Radical Bond Formations


R

Me

O
N

R
R

N
H

R R
R

Ar

2 x 1e oxidant
R
O

Direct and enantioselective access to steroid-type scaffolds

amine catalyst

1e, H+
amine catalyst

H2O, 1e
Me

Me

What substituents

N
N

favor polycyclization?

N
Ar

Ar

R R
R

R R
R

What oxidant favors


polycyclization?

Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Multiple Radical Bond Formations


R

Me

O
N

R
R

N
H

R R
R

Ar

2 x 1e oxidant
R
O

Direct and enantioselective access to steroid-type scaffolds

amine catalyst

1e, H+
amine catalyst

H2O, 1e
Me

Me

What substituents

N
N

favor polycyclization?

N
Ar

Ar

R R
R

R R
R

What oxidant favors


polycyclization?

Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Radical vs. Cation Propagating Species in Polycyclization


Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

TFA

HO
Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Propagating species is carbocation: electron rich double bonds favor cyclization

Me

Me

Electron
donating

N
Ar

Me

Electron
withdrawing

N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Electrophillic
radical

O
N
N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Me CN
Me

Nucleophillic
radical

Propagating species is radical: alternating polarity favors cyclization


Johnson, W. S.; Semmelhack, M. F.; Sultanbawa, M. U. S.; Dolak, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2994.
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Radical vs. Cation Propagating Species in Polycyclization


Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

TFA

HO
Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Propagating species is carbocation: electron rich double bonds favor cyclization

Me

Me

Electron
donating

N
Ar

Me

Electron
withdrawing

N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Electrophillic
radical

O
N
N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Me CN
Me

Nucleophillic
radical

Propagating species is radical: alternating polarity favors cyclization


Johnson, W. S.; Semmelhack, M. F.; Sultanbawa, M. U. S.; Dolak, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2994.
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Radical vs. Cation Propagating Species in Polycyclization


Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

TFA

HO
Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Propagating species is carbocation: electron rich double bonds favor cyclization

Me

Me

Electron
donating

N
Ar

Me

Electron
withdrawing

N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Electrophillic
radical

O
N
N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Me CN
Me

Nucleophillic
radical

Propagating species is radical: alternating polarity favors cyclization


Johnson, W. S.; Semmelhack, M. F.; Sultanbawa, M. U. S.; Dolak, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2994.
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Radical vs. Cation Propagating Species in Polycyclization


Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

TFA

HO
Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Propagating species is carbocation: electron rich double bonds favor cyclization

Me

Me

Electron
donating

N
Ar

Me

Electron
withdrawing

N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Electrophillic
radical

O
N
N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Me CN
Me

Nucleophillic
radical

Propagating species is radical: alternating polarity favors cyclization


Johnson, W. S.; Semmelhack, M. F.; Sultanbawa, M. U. S.; Dolak, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2994.
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Radical vs. Cation Propagating Species in Polycyclization


Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

TFA

HO
Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Propagating species is carbocation: electron rich double bonds favor cyclization

Me

Me

Electron
donating

N
Ar

Me

Electron
withdrawing

N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Electrophillic
radical

O
N
N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Me CN
Me

Nucleophillic
radical

Propagating species is radical: alternating polarity favors cyclization


Johnson, W. S.; Semmelhack, M. F.; Sultanbawa, M. U. S.; Dolak, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2994.
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Radical vs. Cation Propagating Species in Polycyclization


Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

TFA

HO
Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Me

Propagating species is carbocation: electron rich double bonds favor cyclization

Me

Me

Electron
donating

N
Ar

Me

Electron
withdrawing

N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Electrophillic
radical

O
N
N
Ar

Me CN
Me

Me CN
Me

Nucleophillic
radical

Propagating species is radical: alternating polarity favors cyclization


Johnson, W. S.; Semmelhack, M. F.; Sultanbawa, M. U. S.; Dolak, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2994.
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Competition with Premature Radical Oxidation


Me

O
N

Me
N
H

Bicyclization

Ar

CAN
or
Fe(phen)3(PF6)3

precursor

Me

N
Ar

Me

O
N

N
Ar

Monocylization

Me

N
N

product

Me

Ar
Me

Further oxidation
outcompetes cyclization

Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Competition with Premature Radical Oxidation


Me

O
N

Me
N
H

Bicyclization

Ar

CAN
or
Fe(phen)3(PF6)3

precursor

Me

N
Ar

Me

O
N

N
Ar

Monocylization

Me

N
N

product

Me

Ar
Me

Further oxidation
outcompetes cyclization

Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Competition with Premature Radical Oxidation


Me

O
N

Me
N
H

Bicyclization

Ar

CAN
or
Fe(phen)3(PF6)3

precursor

Me

N
Ar

Me

O
N

N
Ar

Monocylization

Me

N
N

product

Me

Ar
Me

Further oxidation
outcompetes cyclization

Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Competition with Premature Radical Oxidation


Me

O
N

Me
N
H

Bicyclization

Ar

CAN
or
Fe(phen)3(PF6)3

precursor

Me

N
Ar

Me

O
N

N
Ar

Monocylization

Me

N
N

product

Me

Ar
Me

Further oxidation
outcompetes cyclization

Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Copper Oxidant Allows for Efficient Bicyclization

Me

O
N

Me

N
H

Me
1-Np

Cu(OTf)2
i-PrCN/DME, 23 C
70% yield
87% ee

H
O

CN
F

CO2Me

MeO

Me

Me

Me

Me

65% yield
90% ee

75% yield
88% ee

74% yield
88% ee

77% yield
87% ee

Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Alternating Polarity of Olefins Allows for Multicyclization


CN
Me

O
N

Me

OMe
N

Me
Ar

Me CN

CN
H

Me
H

Will alternating polarity


enable multicyclization?

CN
H

OMe
H

61% yield
91% ee

CN

Me

Tricyclization

56% yield
92% ee

Tetracyclization
CN

Me

OMe
Me

CN

Me

6 new CC bonds

CN

11 contiguous stereocenters
Me

CN
H

H
O

Me

OMe

CN
H

63% yield
93% ee

62% yield

5 all-carbon quaternary
stereocenters

92% yield per bond formation

Pentacyclization

Hexacyclization
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Alternating Polarity of Olefins Allows for Multicyclization


CN
Me

O
N

Me

OMe
N

Me
Ar

Me CN

CN
H

Me
H

Will alternating polarity


enable multicyclization?

CN
H

OMe
H

61% yield
91% ee

CN

Me

Tricyclization

56% yield
92% ee

Tetracyclization
CN

Me

OMe
Me

CN

Me

6 new CC bonds

CN

11 contiguous stereocenters
Me

CN
H

H
O

Me

OMe

CN
H

63% yield
93% ee

62% yield

5 all-carbon quaternary
stereocenters

92% yield per bond formation

Pentacyclization

Hexacyclization
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Alternating Polarity of Olefins Allows for Multicyclization


CN
Me

O
N

Me

OMe
N

Me
Ar

Me CN

CN
H

Me
H

Will alternating polarity


enable multicyclization?

CN
H

OMe
H

61% yield
91% ee

CN

Me

Tricyclization

56% yield
92% ee

Tetracyclization
CN

Me

OMe
Me

CN

Me

6 new CC bonds

CN

11 contiguous stereocenters
Me

CN
H

H
O

Me

OMe

CN
H

63% yield
93% ee

62% yield

5 all-carbon quaternary
stereocenters

92% yield per bond formation

Pentacyclization

Hexacyclization
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Alternating Polarity of Olefins Allows for Multicyclization


CN
Me

O
N

Me

OMe
N

Me
Ar

Me CN

CN
H

Me
H

Will alternating polarity


enable multicyclization?

CN
H

OMe
H

61% yield
91% ee

CN

Me

Tricyclization

56% yield
92% ee

Tetracyclization
CN

Me

OMe
Me

CN

Me

6 new CC bonds

CN

11 contiguous stereocenters
Me

CN
H

H
O

Me

OMe

CN
H

63% yield
93% ee

62% yield

5 all-carbon quaternary
stereocenters

92% yield per bond formation

Pentacyclization

Hexacyclization
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Alternating Polarity of Olefins Allows for Multicyclization


CN
Me

O
N

Me

OMe
N

Me
Ar

Me CN

CN
H

Me
H

Will alternating polarity


enable multicyclization?

CN
H

OMe
H

61% yield
91% ee

CN

Me

Tricyclization

56% yield
92% ee

Tetracyclization
CN

Me

OMe
Me

CN

Me

6 new CC bonds

CN

11 contiguous stereocenters
Me

CN
H

H
O

Me

OMe

CN
H

63% yield
93% ee

62% yield

5 all-carbon quaternary
stereocenters

92% yield per bond formation

Pentacyclization

Hexacyclization
Rendler, S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5027.

Relatively Few Catalysis Activation Concepts

Many Powerful Reactions

So+ e

catalysis
OrganoSOMO
organocatalysis
Photoredox
!!AAnew
newmode
modeofoforganocatalytic
organocatalyticactivation
activation

The Utility of Merging Different Catalysis Areas: New Catalytic Bond Constructions
Photoredox Catalysis
Representative
Utility
H2 Production

N
N
N

Ru2+
N

N
N

O2 Production

CH4 Production
Light
Energy Storage

The Utility of Merging Different Catalysis Areas: New Catalytic Bond Constructions
Organocatalysis

Photoredox Catalysis

Representative
Transformations

Representative
Utility
O

Aldol

Me
N

Friedel-Crafts
N
H

Vinylation

H2 Production

N
N
N

Ru2+
N

N
N

O2 Production

amine

Allylation

CH4 Production

Enolation
Enal Reduction
Diels-Alder

H2O

Light
Energy Storage

The Utility of Merging Different Catalysis Areas: New Catalytic Bond Constructions
Organocatalysis

Photoredox Catalysis

Representative
Transformations

Representative
Utility
O

Aldol

Me
N

Friedel-Crafts
N
H

Vinylation

H2 Production

N
N
N

Ru2+
N

N
N

O2 Production

amine

Allylation

CH4 Production

Enolation
Enal Reduction
Diels-Alder

H2O

Light
Energy Storage

The Utility of Merging Different Catalysis Areas: New Catalytic Bond Constructions
Organocatalysis

Photoredox Catalysis

Representative
Transformations

Representative
Utility
O

Aldol

Me
N

Friedel-Crafts
N
H

Vinylation

Enal Reduction
Diels-Alder

Ru2+
N

N
N

O2 Production

amine

Allylation
Enolation

H2 Production

N
N

H2O

CH4 Production
Light
Energy Storage

New Organic Transformations with Enantioselective Induction

How can we use Photoredox Catalysis to Enable Aldehyde !-Alkylation


! SOMO catalysis, activated species reacts with electron rich "-systems

Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

Ph

SOMO-phile
Me

Me
N

OSiMe3

Me

oxidant

Me

SiMe3

So

KF3B

! Can we electronically reverse the role of the catalyst

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

h#

photolytic
bond homolysis

enamine

SOMO-activated

(SOMO-phile)

(!-acyl radical)

Me
So

Me

SOMOactivated

SOMO-philes =

Br

h#

= photobox!

Ph

How can we use Photoredox Catalysis to Enable Aldehyde !-Alkylation


! SOMO catalysis, activated species reacts with electron rich "-systems

Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

Ph

SOMO-phile
Me

Me
N

OSiMe3

Me

oxidant

Me

SiMe3

So

KF3B

! Can we electronically reverse the role of the catalyst

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

h#

photolytic
bond homolysis

enamine

SOMO-activated

(SOMO-phile)

(!-acyl radical)

Me
So

Me

SOMOactivated

SOMO-philes =

Br

h#

= photobox!

Ph

How can we use Photoredox Catalysis to Enable Aldehyde !-Alkylation


! SOMO catalysis, activated species reacts with electron rich "-systems

Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

Ph

SOMO-phile
Me

Me
N

OSiMe3

Me

oxidant

Me

SiMe3

So

KF3B

! Can we electronically reverse the role of the catalyst

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

h#

photolytic
bond homolysis

enamine

SOMO-activated

(SOMO-phile)

(!-acyl radical)

Me
So

Me

SOMOactivated

SOMO-philes =

Br

h#

= photobox!

Ph

How can we use Photoredox Catalysis to Enable Aldehyde !-Alkylation


! SOMO catalysis, activated species reacts with electron rich "-systems

Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

Ph

SOMO-phile
Me

Me
N

OSiMe3

Me

oxidant

Me

SiMe3

So

KF3B

! Can we electronically reverse the role of the catalyst

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

h#

photolytic
bond homolysis

enamine

SOMO-activated

(SOMO-phile)

(!-acyl radical)

Me
So

Me

SOMOactivated

SOMO-philes =

Br

h#

= photobox!

Ph

How can we use Photoredox Catalysis to Enable Aldehyde !-Alkylation


! SOMO catalysis, activated species reacts with electron rich "-systems

Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

Ph

SOMO-phile
Me

Me
N

OSiMe3

Me

oxidant

Me

SiMe3

So

KF3B

! Can we electronically reverse the role of the catalyst

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

h#

photolytic
bond homolysis

enamine

SOMO-activated

(SOMO-phile)

(!-acyl radical)

Me
So

Me

SOMOactivated

SOMO-philes =

Br

h#

= photobox!

Ph

Ru(bpy)3: A Versatile and Extensively Utilized Photredox Catalyst

2+

N
N
N

Ru
N

N
N

Ru(bpy)3X2
Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 46, 159.

! Visible MLCT absorption at 452 nm (weak visible light)


! Long-lived excited state (~ 620ns)
! High quantum yield (~0.05 - H2O/298K)
! Effective excited state oxidant and reductant
! Used extensively as electron transfer catalyst
! Inexpensive ($38/g - Strem 2008)

Ru(bpy)3: Electronic Properties that Enable Photredox Catalysis


2+

2+

N
N
N

Ru
N

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

Strong Oxidant
E = 0.84V

Ru(bpy)31+

Photon
Excitation
with weak
visible light
Ru-centered
orbitals (t2g)

Ru(bpy)32+
Metal-Based Ground State

Ligand-centered
orbital (!*)

*Ru(bpy) 2+
3

E = 0.86V

Excited, Ligand-Based State

Strong Reductant

Ru(bpy)33+
Balzani, A. J. V.; Barigelletti, F.; Campagna, S.; Belser, P.; von Zewelsky, A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1988, 84, 85.

How can we use Photoredox Catalysis to Enable Single Electron Pathways


2+

N
N
N

Ru
N

N
N

Ru(bpy)32+

15W
Fluorescent bulb

How can we use Photoredox Catalysis to Enable Single Electron Pathways


*

2+

2+

Br
N
N
N

Ru
N

absorbs

photon

Ru
N

15W
Fluorescent bulb

= single electron transfer

Br

Ru(bpy)32+ *
(excited state)

Ru(bpy)32+

SET

N
N

SET

SOMO-activated

How can we use Photoredox Catalysis to Enable Single Electron Pathways


*

2+

2+

Br
N
N
N

Ru
N

absorbs

photon

N
N
N

Ru
N

Br

N
N

SET

SOMO-activated

Ru(bpy)32+ *
(excited state)
*

Ru(bpy)32+

SET

Fluorescent bulb

Br

N
N
N

SET

1+

15W

Ru
N

Br

= single electron transfer


Ru(bpy)31+

SET

SOMO-activated

How can we use Photoredox Catalysis to Enable Single Electron Pathways


*

2+

2+

Br
N
N
N

Ru
N

absorbs

photon

N
N
N

Ru
N

Br

N
N

SET

SOMO-activated

Ru(bpy)32+ *
(excited state)
*

Ru(bpy)32+

SET

Fluorescent bulb

Br

N
N
N

SET

1+

15W

Ru
N

Br

= single electron transfer


Ru(bpy)31+

! Using a household 15W light bulb with Ru(bpy)

SET

SOMO-activated

highly reactive one-electron species

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis

Photoredox Catalytic
Cycle

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis

Photoredox Catalytic
Cycle

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

oxidant

Photoredox Catalytic
Cycle

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

oxidant

Photoredox Catalytic
Cycle

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant
alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

oxidant

O
Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
Cycle

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

oxidant

alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
SET

electron-deficient
radical A

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

Cycle

Br

Ph

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis

aldehyde
substrate

H
R
O
N
Me

t-Bu

N
H

Organocatalytic
Cycle

catalyst

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

oxidant

alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
SET

electron-deficient
radical A

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

Cycle

Br

Ph

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis


O

Me
N

aldehyde
substrate

Me

t-Bu

H
R
R
O

Me
N

Me

t-Bu

N
H

Organocatalytic
Cycle

catalyst

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

oxidant

alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
SET

electron-deficient
radical A

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

Cycle

Br

Ph

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis


O

Me
N

aldehyde
substrate

Me

t-Bu

H
R
R
O

Me
N

Me

t-Bu

N
H

Organocatalytic
Cycle

catalyst

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

oxidant

alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
SET

electron-deficient
radical A

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

Cycle

Br

Ph

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis


O

Me
N

aldehyde
substrate

Me

t-Bu

H
R
R
O

Me
N

Me

t-Bu

N
H

Organocatalytic

Ph

radical A

Cycle

catalyst

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

oxidant

alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
SET

electron-deficient
radical A

Si-face
open

Cycle

Br

Ph

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis


O

Me
N

aldehyde
substrate

Me

t-Bu

H
R
R
O

Me
N

Me

t-Bu

N
H

Si-face
open

Organocatalytic

Ph

radical A

Cycle

catalyst

Me

O
N

t-Bu

Me

Ph
R

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

oxidant

alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
SET

electron-deficient
radical A

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

Cycle

Br

Ph

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis


O

Me
N

aldehyde
substrate

Me

t-Bu

H
R
R
O

Me
N

Me

t-Bu

N
H

Si-face
open

Organocatalytic

radical A

Cycle

catalyst

Me

Me

O
+

t-Bu

O
N

t-Bu

Me

Me

Ph

Ph

SET

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

!Ru(bpy) 2+
3

oxidant

alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
SET

electron-deficient
radical A

Ph

Cycle

Br

Ph

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis


O

Me
N

aldehyde
substrate

Me

t-Bu

H
R
R
O

Me
N

Me

t-Bu

N
H

Si-face
open

Organocatalytic

Ph

radical A

Cycle

catalyst
O
Me

Ph

Me

O
N

t-Bu

enantioenriched
!-alkylated aldehyde

t-Bu

Me

Me

Ph

Ph

SET

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

"Ru(bpy) 2+
3

oxidant

alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
SET

electron-deficient
radical A

O
N

Cycle

Br

Ph

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Merging Photoredox and Enantioselective Organocatalysis: Initial Results

Catalyst Combination
O

Me

Me
HOTf
N
Me
N
H

Me

Photon Source
N
N
N

Ru
N

N
N

Me

organocatalyst A (20 mol%)

Ru(bpy)3Cl2 B (0.5 mol%)

15 W fluorescent light bulb

Merging Photoredox and Enantioselective Organocatalysis: Initial Results

Catalyst Combination
O

Me
HOTf
N
Me

Me

N
H

Me

O
Bu

Br

octanal

N
N
N

Ru
N

N
N

Me

organocatalyst A (20 mol%)

Photon Source

!-bromoketone

15 W fluorescent light bulb

Ru(bpy)3Cl2 B (0.5 mol%)

fluorescent light

organocatalyst A
Ru(bpy)3Cl2 B
2,6-lutidine, DMF,
23 C

84% yield
H

96% ee
Hex

enantioenriched
!-alkylated aldehyde

preliminary experiments revealed that the asymmetric tandem catalysis mechanism was possible

Photoredox and Organocatalysis: Bromocarbonyl Scope

Me
HOTf

N
O

catalyst combination
15 W fluorescent light

Br

Hex

octanal

FG

2,6-lutidine, DMF, 23 C

alkylation product

!-bromocarbonyl

Hex

Hex

84% yield, 95% ee

80% yield, 92% ee

O Me
EtO2C

CO2Et

Me
H

H
Br

Hex

NO2

OR

H
Br

Br

O2N

alkylation product

87% yield, 96% ee

Me

0.5 mol% Ru(bpy)3Cl2

O
RO

Br

Me

20 mol% catalyst

!-bromocarbonyl

H
MeO

OMe

N
H

FG

enantioenriched
!-alkylated aldehyde

racemic
!-bromocarbonyl

Me

Me

CO2Et

CO2Et
Hex

80% yield, 88% ee

A variety of alkylation substrates can be used that are outside the realm of 2e pathways

Merging Photoredox and Enantioselective Organocatalysis: Initial Results

Catalyst Combination
O

Me

Photon Source
N

Me
HOTf
N

N
N

Me
N
H

Me

Ru
N

N
N

Me

organocatalyst A (20 mol%)

Ru(bpy)3Cl2 B (0.5 mol%)

15 W fluorescent light bulb

CO2Et

H
Hex

octanal

Br

racemic
!-bromoketone

EtO2C

fluorescent light

organocatalyst A
Ru(bpy)3Cl2 B
2,6-lutidine, DMF,
23 C

70% yield,
5:1 dr, 99% ee

O
Hex

enantioenriched
!-alkylated aldehyde

with David Nicewicz, Science, 2008, 3, 77 (published online Thurs, Sept 4th)

Photoredox Organocatalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

N
H

Ph

substrate

Me

catalyst

Me
N
Me
N

Ph

Me

Me

FG

N
Br
FG

substrate

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

catalyst

Me

Photoredox Organocatalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

H
EtO2C

Me

CO2Et

N
H

Ph

substrate

enantiopure
!-malonyl aldehydes

Me

catalyst

Me
N
Me

N
Ph

Me

Me

R
O
FG

enantiopure
"-keto aldehydes

N
Br
FG

substrate

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

catalyst

Me

Photoredox Organocatalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

H
EtO2C

Me

CO2Et

N
H

Ph

substrate

Me

Me

catalyst
enantiopure
!-benzyl aldehydes

enantiopure
!-malonyl aldehydes

Me
N
Me

N
Ph

Me

Me
H
NR2

enantiopure
!"amino aldehydes

O
FG

enantiopure
#-keto aldehydes
O

O
N

H
Br
CN

enantioselective
!-alkylcyanation

FG

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

H
CF3

!-CF3-aldehydes
substrate

catalyst

Photoredox Organocatalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

H
EtO2C

Me

CO2Et

N
H

Ph

substrate

Me

Me

catalyst
enantiopure
!-benzyl aldehydes

enantiopure
!-malonyl aldehydes

Me
N
Me

N
Ph

Me

Me
H
NR2

enantiopure
!"amino aldehydes

O
FG

enantiopure
#-keto aldehydes
O

O
N

H
Br
CN

enantioselective
!-alkylcyanation

FG

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

H
CF3

!-CF3-aldehydes
substrate

catalyst

Merging Photoredox and Organocatalysis: !-Perfluoroalkylation


Versatile synthon for medicinal agent synthesis
O
CF3

H
R

Enhance potency, elevate lipophilicity


and/or improve metabolic stability
No known catalytic routes to !-formyl CF3

Me
F

Odanacatib (Merck)

N
O

O
S

O
NC

N
H
Me
F

H
OMe

Me
N
H CO2Me

H
N
CF3

Vinflunine
(BMS)

H
N

Me

H
OH

Me
Et

CO2Me
OAc

Enantioselective !-perfluoralkylation of formyl could provide new entry to pharmacaphores

Photoredox and Organocatalysis: Trifluoromethylation

Me
HOTf

catalyst combination
15 W fluorescent light

aldehyde

CF3

2,6-lutidine, THF, 20 C

CF3

aldehyde

trifluoromethylation product

CF3

CF3

79% yield, 99% ee

70% yield, 98% ee

N
Boc

O
O

H
H

NBoc

( )5

Me

0.5 mol% Ir(ppy)2bpy

Me

20 mol% catalyst

enantioenriched
!-trifluoromethylation

trifluoromethylation product

N
H

Me

Me

trifluoromethyl iodide

aldehyde

OMe

OMe
H

CF3

73% yield, 90% ee

CF3

61% yield, 93% ee

with Nagib, Scott, JACS, 2009, 131, 10875

Photoredox and Organocatalysis: Trifluoromethylation

Me
HOTf

catalyst combination
15 W fluorescent light

aldehyde

CF3

O
H

CF3

aldehyde

( )5

trifluoromethylation product

CF3

CF3

79% yield, 99% ee

70% yield, 98% ee

O
O
H

CF3

73% yield, 90% ee

OMe

NBoc

Me

0.5 mol% Ir(ppy)2bpy

Me

20 mol% catalyst

enantioenriched
!-trifluoromethylation

N
H

2,6-lutidine, THF, 20 C

trifluoromethylation product

Me

Me
H

trifluoromethyl iodide

aldehyde

CF3
N
Boc

61% yield, 93% ee

with Nagib, Scott, JACS, 2009, 131, 10875

Photoredox and Organocatalysis: perfluoroalkylation

Me
HOTf

catalyst combination
15 W fluorescent light

n-hex

RF2

n-hex

fluoroalkylation product

CF2CF2

RFnI

F3C

n-hex

CO2Et

CF2CO2Et

F3C

F
CF3

n-hex

72% yield, 98% ee

Me

fluoroalkylation product

CF3

73% yield, 96% ee

Me

0.5 mol% Ir(ppy)2bpy

CF2CF3

N
H

20 mol% catalyst

O
I

Me

Me

enantioenriched
!-perfluoroalkylation

fluoroalkyl iodide

RFnI

F
R

2,6-lutidine, THF, 20 C

aldehyde

n-hex

n-hex

89% yield, 99% ee

85% yield, 98% ee

with Nagib, Scott, JACS, 2009, 131, 10875

Photoredox Organocatalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

H
EtO2C

Me

CO2Et

N
H

Ph

substrate

Me

Me

catalyst
enantiopure
!-benzyl aldehydes

enantiopure
!-malonyl aldehydes

Me
N
Me

N
Ph

Me

Me
H
NR2

enantiopure
!"amino aldehydes

O
FG

enantiopure
#-keto aldehydes
O

O
N

H
Br
CN

enantioselective
!-alkylcyanation

FG

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

H
CF3

!-CF3-aldehydes
substrate

catalyst

Photoredox Organocatalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

H
EtO2C

Me

CO2Et

N
H

Ph

substrate

Me

Me

catalyst
enantiopure
!-benzyl aldehydes

enantiopure
!-malonyl aldehydes

Me
N
Me

N
Ph

Me

Me
H
NR2

enantiopure
!"amino aldehydes

O
FG

enantiopure
#-keto aldehydes
O

O
N

H
Br
CN

enantioselective
!-alkylcyanation

FG

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

H
CF3

!-CF3-aldehydes
substrate

catalyst

Photoredox Organocatalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

H
EtO2C

Me

CO2Et

N
H

Ph

substrate

Me

Me

catalyst
enantiopure
!-benzyl aldehydes

enantiopure
!-malonyl aldehydes

Me
N
Me

N
Ph

Me

Me
H
NR2

enantiopure
!"amino aldehydes

O
FG

enantiopure
#-keto aldehydes
O

O
N

H
Br
CN

enantioselective
!-alkylcyanation

FG

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

H
CF3

!-CF3-aldehydes
substrate

catalyst

Photoredox Organocatalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

H
EtO2C

Me

CO2Et

N
H

Ph

substrate

Me

Me

catalyst
enantiopure
!-benzyl aldehydes

enantiopure
!-malonyl aldehydes

Me
N
Me

N
Ph

Me

Me
H
NR2

enantiopure
!"amino aldehydes

O
FG

enantiopure
#-keto aldehydes
O

O
N

H
Br
CN

enantioselective
!-alkylcyanation

FG

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

H
CF3

!-CF3-aldehydes
substrate

catalyst

Photoredox Organocatalysis: Potential Utility of New Catalysis Platform


O

Me
N

Me

H
EtO2C

Me

CO2Et

N
H

Ph

substrate

Me

Me

catalyst
enantiopure
!-benzyl aldehydes

enantiopure
!-malonyl aldehydes

Me
N
Me

N
Ph

Me

Me
H
NR2

enantiopure
!"amino aldehydes

O
FG

enantiopure
#-keto aldehydes
O

O
N

H
Br
CN

enantioselective
!-alkylcyanation

FG

N
N

Ru
N

N
N

H
CF3

!-CF3-aldehydes
substrate

catalyst

Merging Enantioselective Organocatalysis and Photoredox Catalysis


O

Me
N

aldehyde
substrate

Me

t-Bu

H
R
R
O

Me
N

Me

t-Bu

N
H

Si-face
open

Organocatalytic

Ph

radical A

Cycle

catalyst
O
Me

Ph

Me

O
N

t-Bu

enantioenriched
!-alkylated aldehyde

t-Bu

Me

Me

Ph

Ph

SET

Ru(bpy)31+ 3
reductant

"Ru(bpy) 2+
3

oxidant

alkyl halide
alkyl halide
substrate
substrate

Ph

Br

Photoredox Catalytic
SET

electron-deficient
radical A

O
N

Cycle

Br

Ph

Ru(bpy)32+
photoredox catalyst 1

15W Fluorescent bulb

Photoredox Catalysis: New Directions for Organic Synthesis


! Visible Light Photocatalysis of [2+2] Enone Cycloadditions

Ph

5 mol% Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ph

i-Pr2NEt, LiBF4

O
Ph

Ph

MeCN
visible light

Yoon, T. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12866-12887.

89%
>10:1 d.r.

J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14604-14605.

! Photoredox Catalysis: Hydro-dehalogenation of alkanes

2.5 mol% Ru(bpy)3Cl2

Br

i-Pr2NEt, HCO2H
N
N
Boc

Boc

DMF
visible light

Stephenson, C. R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12866-12887.

N
N
Boc

90%

Boc

Photoredox Catalysis: New Directions for Organic Synthesis


! Visible Light Photocatalysis of [2+2] Enone Cycloadditions

Ph

5 mol% Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ph

i-Pr2NEt, LiBF4

O
Ph

Ph

MeCN
visible light

Yoon, T. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12866-12887.

89%
>10:1 d.r.

J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14604-14605.

! Photoredox Catalysis: Hydro-dehalogenation of alkanes

2.5 mol% Ru(bpy)3Cl2

Br

i-Pr2NEt, HCO2H
N
N
Boc

Boc

DMF
visible light

Stephenson, C. R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12866-12887.

N
N
Boc

90%

Boc

Putting Science, Catalysis and Organocatalysis in Context


# of Hits for Google Keyword Search:

Overview of Chemistry Hot Topics Google Hits


600,000
537,000
435,000
417,000
253,000
159,000
137,000

Overview of Chemistry Hot Topics Google Hits


600,000
537,000
435,000
417,000
253,000
159,000
137,000

Organocatalytic
Activation Modes

Overview of Chemistry Hot Topics Google Hits


600,000
537,000
435,000
417,000
253,000
159,000
137,000

Emerging
Important Areas

Organocatalytic
Activation Modes

The early years: Berkeley

MacMillan Group (1st Year)


Kateri Ahrendt
Chris Borths

Tristan Lambert
Jake Wiener

Vy Dong

Tehshik Yoon

Wendy Jen

Dr. Jeongbob Seo

Naiomi Anchor (UG)

MacMillan Group Caltech 2002

Joel Austin
Chris Borths
Sean Brown
Craig Countryman
Vy Dong
James Falsey

Nikki Goodwin
Wendy Jen
Brian Kwan
Dr. Seongon Kim
Tristan Lambert
Catharine Larsen

Ian Mangion
Alan Northrup
Nick Paras
Julie Park
Dr. Claudia Roberson
Dr. Jeongbob Seo

Dr. Chris Sinz


Jake Wiener
Rebecca Wilson
Dr. Wenjing Xiao
Tehshik Yoon

MacMillan Group Present

Dr. Muriel Amatore


Dr. Kate Ashton
Teresa Beeson
Joe Carpenter
Diane Carrera
Dr. Jay Conrad
Dr. Tom Graham
Dr. Christoph Grondal

Dr. Pilar Garcia Garcia


Dr. J. B. Hong
Jeff Van Humbeck
Casey Jones
Spencer Jones
Nate Jui
Dr. Mark Kerr
Dr. Hahn Kim

Rob Knowles
Sandra Lee
Dr. Jon Martel
Tony Mastracchio
David Nagib
Dr. David Nicewicz
Atsushi Ohigashi
Phong Pham

Dr. Trevor Rainey


Dr.Maud Reiter
Katie Saliba
Bryon Simmons
Grace Wang
Dr. Abbas Walji
Alex Warkentin
Ben Zegarelli

MacMillan Group Present

Anna Allen
Anthony Casarez
Joe Carpenter
Diane Carrera
Dr. Giuseppe Cecera
Dr. Jay Conrad
Jae Won Lee
Dr. Andrew Dilger

Dr. Rebecca Grange


Benjamin Horning
Jeff Van Humbeck
Spencer Jones
Nate Jui
Dr. Hahn Kim
Dr. Chris Kokotos
Brian Laforteza

Dr. Esther Lee


Tony Mastracchio
Dr. Andrew McNally
David Nagib
Phong Pham
Dr. Mark Pickworth
Dr. Seb Rendler
Hui-Wen Shih

Bryon Simmons
Scott Simonovich
Dr. Feili Tang
Mark Vander Wal
Jeff Van Humbeck
Alex Warkentin
SiYi Wang
Dr. Alan Watson

Acknowledgments
Funding (non-profit)

NIH
(NIGMS)

UC AIDS
Research Fund

Petroleum Research
Foundation

Sloan Fellowship

NSF

Funding (pharmaceutical)

Research Corporation
Innovation Award
Cottrell Scholar

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen