Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Santa Cruz City of Yes Central Coast 14% 45.5 94,887
California Water Service Company King City Yes Central Coast 5% 49.8 14,726
Atascadero Mutual Water Company Yes Central Coast 8% 52.4 31,000
Goleta Water District Yes Central Coast ‐4% 53.0 86,946
Santa Barbara City of Yes Central Coast 24% 53.1 93,091
Soquel Creek Water District Yes Central Coast 16% 53.9 37,720
California‐American Water Company Monterey District Yes Central Coast 9% 54.2 109,817
San Luis Obispo City of Yes Central Coast 6% 55.1 45,541
Watsonville City of Yes Central Coast 5% 57.7 65,739
California Water Service Company Salinas District Yes Central Coast 9% 60.4 120,770
Santa Maria City of Yes Central Coast 16% 60.8 101,103
San Lorenzo Valley Water District Yes Central Coast 16% 61.2 19,000
Marina Coast Water District Yes Central Coast 11% 64.3 31,405
Morro Bay City of Yes Central Coast 4% 65.0 10,234
Lompoc City of Yes Central Coast 7% 65.9 39,846
Paso Robles City of Yes Central Coast 8% 67.8 30,450
Scotts Valley Water District Yes Central Coast 0% 70.0 10,509
Greenfield, City of Yes Central Coast 1% 70.2 17,898
Gilroy City of Yes Central Coast 13% 70.8 52,413
Sunnyslope County Water District Yes Central Coast ‐11% 72.0 19,189
Soledad, City of Yes Central Coast 10% 73.0 16,729
Hollister City of No Central Coast ‐16% 77.5 23,021
Carpinteria Valley Water District Yes Central Coast ‐39% 81.6 14,616
Pismo Beach City of Yes Central Coast 7% 93.5 7,705
Alco Water Service No Central Coast 2% 97.7 29,179
Arroyo Grande City of Yes Central Coast 13% 98.9 17,003
Nipomo Community Services District Yes Central Coast 5% 124.3 12,512
Montecito Water District Yes Central Coast 37% 130.3 13,500
Golden State Water Company Orcutt Yes Central Coast 8% 137.8 31,872
Calexico City of Yes Colorado River 17% 74.7 40,516
El Centro City of Yes Colorado River 9% 78.3 44,311
Twentynine Palms Water District Yes Colorado River 16% 87.5 18,795
Coachella City of Yes Colorado River 4% 87.7 45,591
Brawley City of Yes Colorado River 51% 94.9 27,743
Page 1
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Banning City of Yes Colorado River 1% 107.8 30,325
Joshua Basin Water District Yes Colorado River ‐2% 110.8 9,514
Blythe City of Yes Colorado River 13% 114.4 13,839
Imperial, City of Yes Colorado River 6% 114.6 18,022
Mission Springs Water District Yes Colorado River ‐10% 120.9 34,766
Indio City of Yes Colorado River 6% 136.4 81,393
Desert Water Agency Yes Colorado River 7% 202.4 62,140
Coachella Valley Water District Yes Colorado River 4% 238.8 213,802
Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company Yes Colorado River 26% 343.0 6,159
Arcata City of Yes North Coast ‐11% 43.7 18,464
Rohnert Park City of No North Coast ‐16% 48.6 43,398
Crescent City City of Yes North Coast 20% 52.1 18,290
Yreka, City of Yes North Coast 20% 53.0 7,840
Windsor, Town of Yes North Coast 4% 55.6 27,391
McKinleyville Community Service District Yes North Coast 8% 56.7 16,900
Eureka City of No North Coast 5% 61.1 26,066
Sweetwater Springs Water District Yes North Coast 5% 62.6 7,703
California Water Service Company Redwood Valley Yes North Coast 23% 63.7 3,604
Ukiah City of Yes North Coast ‐30% 65.0 16,075
Santa Rosa City of Yes North Coast ‐12% 65.6 170,093
Healdsburg City of Yes North Coast 7% 79.4 11,541
Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District Yes North Coast ‐36% 80.3 422
Fortuna City of Yes North Coast 6% 86.6 11,926
Humboldt Community Service District Yes North Coast 8% 88.9 20,032
Tahoe City Public Utilities District Yes North Lahontan 24% 42.1 5,346
South Tahoe Public Utilities District Yes North Lahontan 6% 53.4 33,124
Truckee‐Donner Public Utilities District Yes North Lahontan 18% 58.1 32,776
North Tahoe Public Utility District Yes North Lahontan 19% 64.4 7,500
Susanville City of Yes North Lahontan 0% 82.6 8,978
Woodland City of Yes Sacramento River 5% 58.8 57,223
Roseville City of Yes Sacramento River 19% 62.6 122,946
Fairfield City of Yes Sacramento River 13% 67.6 105,392
California Water Service Company Oroville Yes Sacramento River 22% 68.4 10,626
Del Oro Water Company Yes Sacramento River 3% 69.1 9,615
Page 2
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Shasta Lake City of Yes Sacramento River 35% 74.3 10,293
Elk Grove Water Service Yes Sacramento River 10% 78.5 44,099
California Water Service Company Marysville Yes Sacramento River 13% 79.9 12,131
Davis City of Yes Sacramento River 20% 80.2 65,783
Sacramento City of Yes Sacramento River 13% 86.5 475,122
California Water Service Company Willows Yes Sacramento River 17% 88.5 7,079
California Water Service Company Dixon, City of Yes Sacramento River 8% 89.4 9,826
Fruitridge Vista Water Company Yes Sacramento River 14% 92.3 21,441
Georgetown Divide Public Utilities District Yes Sacramento River ‐3% 96.1 9,863
California‐American Water Company Sacramento District Yes Sacramento River ‐19% 97.1 201,418
Nevada Irrigation District Yes Sacramento River 0% 97.4 44,761
West Sacramento City of Yes Sacramento River 12% 104.1 50,836
El Dorado Irrigation District Yes Sacramento River 14% 104.3 128,500
Paradise Irrigation District Yes Sacramento River 3% 105.2 26,032
Galt City of Yes Sacramento River 18% 105.2 24,289
Citrus Heights Water District Yes Sacramento River 11% 107.7 67,333
Golden State Water Company Cordova Yes Sacramento River 17% 109.1 43,767
Sacramento County Water Agency Yes Sacramento River 13% 111.2 163,449
Redding City of Yes Sacramento River 5% 112.3 91,207
California Water Service Company Chico District Yes Sacramento River 5% 112.3 101,358
Yuba City City of Yes Sacramento River 12% 112.6 65,372
Rio Linda ‐ Elverta Community Water District Yes Sacramento River 19% 114.0 10,936
Lincoln City of Yes Sacramento River 12% 114.2 45,206
Linda County Water District Yes Sacramento River ‐3% 116.9 18,808
Olivehurst Public Utility District Yes Sacramento River 3% 119.4 19,509
Sacramento Suburban Water District Yes Sacramento River 2% 119.7 174,304
Carmichael Water District Yes Sacramento River 10% 123.7 38,354
Fair Oaks Water District Sacramento River 13% 125.1 36,226
Placer County Water Agency No Sacramento River 11% 127.4 95,717
Folsom City of Yes Sacramento River 11% 130.6 61,877
Rio Vista, city of Yes Sacramento River ‐25% 147.5 8,324
Orange Vale Water Company Yes Sacramento River 43% 151.3 14,283
Bella Vista Water District Yes Sacramento River ‐4% 152.7 16,500
San Juan Water District Yes Sacramento River 20% 159.9 39,020
Page 3
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Red Bluff City of Yes Sacramento River 4% 162.7 14,076
Coastside County Water District Yes San Francisco Bay ‐2% 38.5 16,668
Martinez City of Yes San Francisco Bay 6% 38.8 35,375
North Coast County Water District Yes San Francisco Bay 5% 40.1 39,000
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Yes San Francisco Bay 3% 41.7 846,601
California Water Service Company South San Francisco Yes San Francisco Bay 4% 42.9 60,924
Dublin San Ramon Services District Yes San Francisco Bay 22% 44.5 78,164
Westborough Water District Yes San Francisco Bay 3% 44.9 14,050
San Bruno City of Yes San Francisco Bay 18% 45.0 43,798
Milpitas City of Yes San Francisco Bay 11% 46.6 70,817
Petaluma City of Yes San Francisco Bay 3% 48.7 61,258
Valley of the Moon Water District Yes San Francisco Bay ‐7% 51.0 23,478
Daly City City of No San Francisco Bay 15% 51.3 105,076
Millbrae City of Yes San Francisco Bay 13% 52.1 21,532
Menlo Park City of Yes San Francisco Bay 16% 52.7 16,066
Vallejo City of Yes San Francisco Bay 5% 53.9 124,000
Golden State Water Company Bay Point Yes San Francisco Bay 7% 56.3 22,258
Mountain View City of Yes San Francisco Bay 3% 58.2 75,077
Burlingame City of Yes San Francisco Bay ‐38% 58.5 30,282
Hayward City of Yes San Francisco Bay ‐12% 60.9 151,037
Sunnyvale City of Yes San Francisco Bay 4% 61.2 147,055
Redwood City City of Yes San Francisco Bay 3% 62.3 87,696
Great Oaks Water Company Incorporated Yes San Francisco Bay 10% 62.4 99,199
Alameda County Water District Yes San Francisco Bay 14% 63.8 340,000
California Water Service Company Mid Peninsula Yes San Francisco Bay ‐10% 63.9 132,554
East Bay Municipal Utilities District Yes San Francisco Bay 6% 65.8 1,390,000
San Jose Water Company Yes San Francisco Bay 8% 66.2 990,000
Palo Alto City of Yes San Francisco Bay 7% 67.1 64,403
Napa City of Yes San Francisco Bay 10% 69.4 85,679
Contra Costa Water District Yes San Francisco Bay 6% 71.9 197,536
Santa Clara City of Yes San Francisco Bay 2% 72.4 118,459
California Water Service Company Livermore Yes San Francisco Bay 30% 73.3 57,410
American Canyon, City of Yes San Francisco Bay 3% 75.6 20,080
Estero Municipal Improvement District Yes San Francisco Bay ‐11% 76.2 37,165
Page 4
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
San Jose City of Yes San Francisco Bay 7% 78.4 117,576
Marin Municipal Water District Yes San Francisco Bay 0% 79.5 188,200
Mid‐Peninsula Water District Yes San Francisco Bay 3% 81.1 26,030
Pittsburg City of Yes San Francisco Bay 3% 83.1 66,183
Livermore City of Division of Water Resources Yes San Francisco Bay 18% 83.6 27,033
North Marin Water District Yes San Francisco Bay 8% 84.2 61,294
Suisun‐Solano Water Authority Yes San Francisco Bay 21% 85.9 28,549
Pleasanton City of Yes San Francisco Bay 25% 89.5 73,067
Benicia City of Yes San Francisco Bay 30% 94.3 28,086
Sonoma City of Yes San Francisco Bay ‐8% 96.0 11,579
California Water Service Company Los Altos/Suburban Yes San Francisco Bay 8% 104.3 68,109
California Water Service Company Bear Gulch Yes San Francisco Bay ‐3% 133.9 58,720
Hillsborough Town of No San Francisco Bay ‐2% 181.3 10,850
Tracy City of Yes San Joaquin River 18% 41.4 85,146
Amador Water Agency Yes San Joaquin River 7% 54.1 23,347
California Water Service Company Stockton Yes San Joaquin River 6% 60.9 170,257
Riverbank City of San Joaquin River 30% 62.2 23,298
City of Newman Water Department Yes San Joaquin River 17% 65.7 10,668
Stockton City of Yes San Joaquin River 31% 74.2 177,808
Tuolumne Utilities District Yes San Joaquin River 7% 78.7 28,997
Groveland Community Services District Yes San Joaquin River ‐6% 80.1 3,400
Livingston City of Yes San Joaquin River ‐1% 84.9 14,898
Diablo Water District Yes San Joaquin River 6% 88.9 38,194
Calaveras County Water District Yes San Joaquin River 15% 89.7 31,750
Lathrop, City of Yes San Joaquin River 3% 91.8 19,831
Ceres City of Yes San Joaquin River ‐11% 93.8 46,463
Antioch City of Yes San Joaquin River 11% 95.4 106,455
Manteca City of Yes San Joaquin River 16% 96.0 74,460
Oakdale City of Yes San Joaquin River 39% 97.4 21,442
Brentwood City of Yes San Joaquin River 12% 103.7 54,741
Patterson City of Yes San Joaquin River 10% 105.8 20,922
Lodi City of Public Works Department Yes San Joaquin River 15% 107.8 63,651
Los Banos, City of Yes San Joaquin River 11% 108.3 37,168
Turlock City of Yes San Joaquin River 2% 109.0 71,181
Page 5
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Madera City of Yes San Joaquin River ‐9% 110.5 63,008
Merced City of Yes San Joaquin River 15% 118.4 83,400
Winton Water & Sanitary District Yes San Joaquin River 15% 120.2 8,500
Atwater City of Yes San Joaquin River 46% 126.1 29,500
Discovery Bay Community Services District No San Joaquin River 19% 139.0 13,000
Modesto, City of Yes San Joaquin River ‐8% 139.5 217,269
Madera County Yes San Joaquin River 17% 140.5 11,853
Ripon City of Yes San Joaquin River 21% 172.1 14,915
Vernon City of Yes South Coast 13% 38.5 122
City of Big Bear Lake, Dept of Water & Power Yes South Coast 5% 38.6 25,596
California Water Service Company East Los Angeles Yes South Coast 3% 45.2 154,125
Park Water Company Yes South Coast ‐5% 48.6 125,784
Big Bear City Community Services District Yes South Coast 5% 49.1 12,411
Paramount City of Yes South Coast ‐10% 50.8 55,051
South Gate City of Yes South Coast ‐2% 51.0 96,057
Golden State Water Company Florence Graham Yes South Coast 3% 51.9 65,492
Oxnard City of Yes South Coast 7% 51.9 203,645
Seal Beach City of Yes South Coast ‐10% 52.4 24,168
Fountain Valley City of Yes South Coast 27% 54.1 56,916
Golden State Water Company Southwest Yes South Coast 4% 55.0 271,677
Compton City of Yes South Coast 9% 55.8 81,963
Golden State Water Company Bell‐Bell Gardens Yes South Coast 3% 56.8 57,934
La Palma City of Yes South Coast 1% 59.5 15,544
Pomona City of Yes South Coast 1% 59.9 151,713
Golden State Water Company Norwalk Yes South Coast 9% 60.1 44,466
Huntington Park City of Yes South Coast 6% 60.7 64,219
Sweetwater Authority Yes South Coast 5% 61.0 189,970
Santa Ana City of Yes South Coast ‐2% 62.6 332,005
San Diego City of Yes South Coast ‐4% 63.0 1,292,496
Irvine Ranch Water District No South Coast ‐11% 63.4 385,056
Escondido City of Yes South Coast ‐1% 63.6 134,053
San Gabriel Valley Water Company Yes South Coast ‐8% 64.6 271,817
Golden State Water Company S San Gabriel Yes South Coast 2% 65.6 27,656
Camarillo City of Yes South Coast 9% 65.9 46,809
Page 6
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Inglewood City of Yes South Coast 3% 65.9 86,418
Montebello Land and Water Company Yes South Coast 4% 67.6 32,219
Valencia Water Company Yes South Coast 15% 67.8 118,224
El Segundo City of Yes South Coast 5% 67.8 16,654
Hawthorne City of Yes South Coast ‐3% 68.1 44,507
Santa Paula City of Yes South Coast 11% 68.8 30,009
Golden State Water Company Culver City Yes South Coast 5% 68.9 36,215
Port Hueneme City of Yes South Coast 7% 69.1 21,555
Chino City of Yes South Coast 0% 69.2 78,073
California‐American Water Company San Diego District Yes South Coast ‐7% 70.0 95,358
Lynwood City of Yes South Coast ‐6% 70.0 71,297
Lakewood City of Yes South Coast ‐7% 70.4 59,081
Lake Hemet Municipal Water District Yes South Coast 11% 71.2 52,914
California Water Service Company Dominguez Yes South Coast ‐24% 71.4 142,196
Golden State Water Company Artesia Yes South Coast 3% 72.3 47,978
Santa Fe Springs City of Yes South Coast 10% 72.5 18,199
Golden State Water Company West Orange Yes South Coast 6% 73.3 111,904
Padre Dam Municipal Water District Yes South Coast ‐4% 73.9 89,171
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Yes South Coast 5% 73.9 3,935,257
Long Beach City of Yes South Coast 2% 73.9 473,050
La Habra City of Public Works Yes South Coast ‐29% 74.0 63,118
Helix Water District Yes South Coast 2% 74.1 270,375
Pico Rivera City of Yes South Coast ‐5% 74.7 39,002
Azusa City of Yes South Coast 6% 75.0 110,000
Otay Water District Yes South Coast ‐3% 76.0 217,600
Lakeside Water District Yes South Coast ‐10% 76.2 35,500
San Buenaventura City of Yes South Coast 7% 77.6 113,478
Lomita City of Yes South Coast 11% 78.1 20,463
Westminster City of Yes South Coast ‐5% 78.5 93,322
Brea City of Yes South Coast ‐17% 78.9 42,397
Rowland Water District Yes South Coast ‐8% 79.1 62,106
Buena Park City of Yes South Coast ‐7% 79.7 82,364
California Water Service Company Hermosa/Redondo Yes South Coast 4% 79.9 95,730
Bellflower‐Somerset Mutual Water Company Yes South Coast 4% 80.0 46,300
Page 7
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Anaheim City of Yes South Coast 0% 80.3 358,549
Huntington Beach City of Yes South Coast 2% 80.7 196,041
Golden State Water Company S Arcadia Yes South Coast 6% 81.2 26,827
Vista Irrigation District Yes South Coast ‐3% 81.5 124,746
Oceanside City of Yes South Coast ‐3% 81.8 171,183
Santa Monica City of Yes South Coast 4% 82.1 92,185
San Gabriel County Water District Yes South Coast 5% 82.5 45,000
Orchard Dale Water District Yes South Coast 2% 82.9 19,894
Monte Vista Water District Yes South Coast 3% 83.4 54,460
Vallecitos Water District Yes South Coast 5% 83.6 94,283
Laguna Beach County Water District Yes South Coast ‐3% 83.8 19,121
Santa Margarita Water District Yes South Coast 0% 83.8 157,015
Perris, City of Yes South Coast ‐3% 84.8 9,000
Newport Beach City of Yes South Coast 26% 85.2 65,551
San Fernando City of Yes South Coast 8% 86.3 23,728
Lincoln Avenue Water Company Yes South Coast 17% 86.8 16,126
Ontario City of Yes South Coast 2% 87.0 166,866
Glendale City of Yes South Coast 4% 87.2 193,300
San Clemente City of Yes South Coast ‐6% 87.5 50,960
Monterey Park City of No South Coast ‐3% 87.5 62,183
Downey City of Yes South Coast ‐3% 87.5 111,931
Mesa Water District Yes South Coast 12% 88.4 108,000
Suburban Water Systems San Jose Hills Yes South Coast 4% 88.5 178,500
Norwalk City of Yes South Coast ‐2% 88.5 18,361
Colton, City of Yes South Coast 1% 88.9 47,429
Sunny Slope Water Company No South Coast 0% 89.3 30,611
Eastern Municipal Water District Yes South Coast ‐1% 89.4 535,600
San Bernardino City of Yes South Coast ‐3% 89.7 187,690
Alhambra City of Yes South Coast ‐1% 90.3 85,068
Jurupa Community Service District Yes South Coast 4% 90.3 118,731
Covina City of Yes South Coast 12% 90.8 33,300
Golden State Water Company Placentia Yes South Coast 8% 91.5 46,543
Burbank City of Yes South Coast 15% 91.7 105,543
Manhattan Beach City of Yes South Coast ‐1% 92.1 35,726
Page 8
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
South Pasadena City of Yes South Coast 1% 92.2 25,899
South Coast Water District Yes South Coast 10% 92.3 34,816
Pasadena City of Yes South Coast 5% 93.8 165,740
Golden State Water Company Simi Valley Yes South Coast 12% 94.2 43,351
Pico Water District Yes South Coast 1% 95.0 24,100
Riverside City of Yes South Coast ‐3% 96.0 298,669
El Toro Water District Yes South Coast 9% 96.9 48,628
Sanger City of South Coast ‐22% 97.9 25,664
Crescenta Valley Water District Yes South Coast 3% 98.1 31,966
Moulton Niguel Water District Yes South Coast ‐3% 99.4 172,068
Carlsbad Municipal Water District Yes South Coast 3% 102.0 84,838
East Valley Water District Yes South Coast 12% 103.0 97,318
Ramona Municipal Water District Yes South Coast ‐2% 103.0 35,100
Suburban Water Systems Whittier/La Mirada Yes South Coast 3% 103.2 115,000
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Yes South Coast ‐64% 104.1 148,587
La Verne City of Yes South Coast ‐4% 104.2 32,228
Whittier City of No South Coast ‐22% 104.4 49,954
Hemet City of Yes South Coast ‐4% 104.7 23,537
San Gabriel Valley Fontana Water Company Yes South Coast ‐3% 104.9 209,035
Fullerton City of Yes South Coast ‐6% 105.0 138,000
Beaumont‐Cherry Valley Water District Yes South Coast ‐3% 105.5 43,111
Chino Hills City of Yes South Coast ‐40% 105.9 74,738
Garden Grove City of Yes South Coast ‐8% 108.1 177,020
Ventura County Waterworks District No. 8 Yes South Coast 8% 108.2 90,687
San Juan Capistrano City of Yes South Coast ‐1% 109.6 39,047
Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District Yes South Coast 1% 109.9 29,955
Castaic Lake Water Agency Santa Clarita Water Division Yes South Coast 15% 110.9 119,650
Cerritos City of Yes South Coast 9% 111.5 49,041
Lee Lake Water District No South Coast ‐1% 111.9 15,543
Walnut Valley Water District Yes South Coast 4% 112.8 113,236
Newhall County Water District Yes South Coast 10% 114.0 45,036
Fillmore City of No South Coast 4% 114.4 15,222
Arcadia City of Yes South Coast 6% 115.1 54,705
Monrovia City of Yes South Coast 5% 115.3 36,590
Page 9
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Rubidoux Community Service District Yes South Coast ‐2% 115.7 29,900
Golden State Water Company San Dimas Yes South Coast ‐3% 116.4 54,872
Thousand Oaks City of Yes South Coast 10% 117.4 51,609
Rialto City of Yes South Coast ‐3% 117.9 48,623
San Dieguito Water District Yes South Coast ‐12% 119.1 37,168
Poway City of Yes South Coast ‐2% 120.0 48,261
Western Municipal Water District of Riverside Yes South Coast ‐5% 120.2 96,139
Orange City of Yes South Coast 0% 121.0 139,463
Cucamonga Valley Water District Yes South Coast 2% 121.2 204,297
San Jacinto City of Yes South Coast 7% 121.4 15,200
Tustin City of Yes South Coast 2% 121.9 67,700
Yorba Linda Water District Yes South Coast 2% 122.3 73,990
San Bernardino County Service Area 70 Yes South Coast 3% 122.4 10,174
California‐American Water Company Los Angeles District Yes South Coast ‐7% 123.4 102,889
Fallbrook Public Utility District Yes South Coast ‐18% 130.3 34,894
Rubio Canyon Land and Water Association Yes South Coast 0% 130.5 9,600
Golden State Water Company Ojai Yes South Coast 21% 131.7 7,188
Trabuco Canyon Water District Yes South Coast ‐21% 132.3 12,700
Triunfo Sanitation District / Oak Park Water Service Yes South Coast 14% 133.4 12,200
Loma Linda City of * Yes South Coast ‐6% 133.8 23,614
Glendora City of Yes South Coast 13% 136.1 50,073
Golden State Water Company Claremont Yes South Coast 8% 136.3 37,160
California‐American Water Ventura District Yes South Coast ‐7% 138.5 62,144
West Valley Water District Yes South Coast 5% 139.3 73,016
Upland City of Yes South Coast 4% 142.2 75,670
Riverside Highland Water Company Yes South Coast 2% 146.2 14,730
Sierra Madre City of Yes South Coast 19% 152.6 11,094
Norco City of Yes South Coast ‐10% 152.7 27,160
Olivenhain Municipal Water District Yes South Coast ‐4% 156.5 69,175
Yucaipa Valley Water District Yes South Coast ‐1% 156.7 44,007
Beverly Hills City of Yes South Coast 4% 167.6 42,157
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District Yes South Coast ‐1% 168.4 75,384
Redlands City of Yes South Coast ‐7% 169.5 77,852
Camrosa Water District Yes South Coast 12% 170.9 27,037
Page 10
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Los Angeles County Public Works Waterworks District 29 Yes South Coast ‐5% 180.3 31,064
Valley Center Municipal Water District Yes South Coast ‐7% 191.1 25,378
California Water Service Company Palos Verdes Yes South Coast ‐1% 200.1 69,867
Rancho California Water District Yes South Coast ‐14% 221.0 140,603
East Orange County Water District Yes South Coast 4% 222.1 3,247
Rainbow Municipal Water District Yes South Coast ‐13% 225.8 19,611
Valley Water Company Yes South Coast 1% 242.5 9,900
Casitas Municipal Water District Yes South Coast 25% 247.8 3,478
Golden State Water Company Cowan Heights Yes South Coast 2% 267.7 7,254
California Water Service Company Westlake Yes South Coast ‐36% 300.9 19,459
Serrano Water District Yes South Coast 3% 333.3 6,641
Santa Fe Irrigation District Yes South Coast ‐4% 366.7 19,839
Lake Arrowhead Community Services District Yes South Lahontan 3% 22.6 28,066
Mammoth Community Water District Yes South Lahontan 24% 39.3 16,739
California City City of Yes South Lahontan ‐34% 56.6 14,120
Valley County Water District Yes South Lahontan 3% 58.3 70,271
Crestline Village Water District Yes South Lahontan ‐8% 63.0 7,446
Adelanto City of No South Lahontan 4% 72.9 32,543
Rosamond Community Service District Yes South Lahontan 20% 76.7 17,700
Golden State Water Company Barstow Yes South Lahontan 8% 78.0 31,209
Phelan Pinon Hills Community Services District Yes South Lahontan 3% 86.9 25,160
Hesperia Water District City of Yes South Lahontan 5% 91.1 91,627
Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company Yes South Lahontan 0% 91.8 71,184
Indian Wells Valley Water District Yes South Lahontan 20% 97.4 31,120
Palmdale Water District Yes South Lahontan 11% 101.3 109,395
Los Angeles County Public Works Waterworks District 40 Yes South Lahontan 18% 105.3 206,454
Victorville Water District Yes South Lahontan 6% 115.3 116,173
California Water Service Company Antelope Valley Yes South Lahontan 4% 133.3 3,387
San Bernardino County Service Area 64 Yes South Lahontan 7% 138.4 12,514
Quartz Hill Water District Yes South Lahontan 12% 168.0 20,352
Reedley City of Yes Tulare Lake 4% 46.9 24,194
West Kern Water District Yes Tulare Lake 36% 64.8 23,511
Wasco City of Yes Tulare Lake 16% 69.6 26,159
Tehachapi, City of Yes Tulare Lake ‐7% 72.0 8,923
Page 11
March 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R‐RGPCD)
Total
Mandatory Percent Reduction
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region Estimated R‐GPCD Population
Restrictions 2013‐2015
Served
Fresno City of Yes Tulare Lake ‐3% 76.9 515,609
Porterville City of Yes Tulare Lake 5% 78.4 61,946
California Water Service Company Kern River Valley Yes Tulare Lake 4% 81.8 5,586
Delano City of Yes Tulare Lake ‐2% 86.8 48,957
Hanford City of Yes Tulare Lake 7% 90.7 57,050
Tulare, City of Yes Tulare Lake 5% 91.8 61,170
Arvin Community Services District Yes Tulare Lake 11% 95.4 19,960
Bakersfield City of Yes Tulare Lake 14% 96.1 142,035
California Water Service Company Visalia Yes Tulare Lake 10% 97.0 137,626
Lamont Public Utility District Yes Tulare Lake 0% 99.9 18,987
Shafter City of Yes Tulare Lake 1% 108.3 18,488
Exeter City of Yes Tulare Lake 4% 109.9 10,334
California Water Service Company Selma Yes Tulare Lake 16% 116.1 24,596
Lemoore City of Yes Tulare Lake 5% 117.9 25,281
California Water Service Company Bakersfield Yes Tulare Lake 6% 126.0 277,947
Clovis City of Yes Tulare Lake ‐2% 133.0 106,076
Corcoran, City of No Tulare Lake 12% 145.3 24,154
Oildale Mutual Water Company Yes Tulare Lake 0% 147.1 33,163
Kingsburg, City of Yes Tulare Lake 23% 169.1 11,504
Pinedale County Water District Yes Tulare Lake 12% 174.8 8,495
East Niles Community Service District Yes Tulare Lake 0% 192.9 26,000
Bakman Water Company Yes Tulare Lake ‐19% 215.6 13,960
Vaughn Water Company Yes Tulare Lake 6% 218.5 30,422
Page 12