Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • Oyama V

    Hochgeladen von

    api-281326248
    30 Ansichten1 Seite
    The California Alien Land Law allowed the state to seize agricultural land recorded in the name of a minor American citizen because his father, a Japanese alien ineligible for naturalization, had paid for the land and was appointed the son's guardian. The Supreme Court held that this deprived the son of equal protection under the law and his privileges as a citizen, violating the Fourteenth Amendment. Petitioners argued that the law deprived both the son and father of equal protection, and took property after the statute of limitations had expired, violating due process.

    Originalbeschreibung:

    Originaltitel

    oyama v

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Verfügbare Formate

    DOCX, PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    The California Alien Land Law allowed the state to seize agricultural land recorded in the name of a minor American citizen because his father, a Japanese alien ineligible for naturalization, had paid for the land and was appointed the son's guardian. The Supreme Court held that this deprived the son of equal protection under the law and his privileges as a citizen, violating the Fourteenth Amendment. Petitioners argued that the law deprived both the son and father of equal protection, and took property after the statute of limitations had expired, violating due process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als DOCX, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    30 Ansichten1 Seite

    Oyama V

    Hochgeladen von

    api-281326248
    The California Alien Land Law allowed the state to seize agricultural land recorded in the name of a minor American citizen because his father, a Japanese alien ineligible for naturalization, had paid for the land and was appointed the son's guardian. The Supreme Court held that this deprived the son of equal protection under the law and his privileges as a citizen, violating the Fourteenth Amendment. Petitioners argued that the law deprived both the son and father of equal protection, and took property after the statute of limitations had expired, violating due process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als DOCX, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 1

    Oyama v.

    California
    The California Alien Land Law, as applied in this case to effect an escheat to
    the State of certain agricultural lands recorded in the name of a minor
    American citizen because they had been paid for by his father, a Japanese
    alien ineligible for naturalization who was appointed the son's guardian, held
    to have deprived the son of the equal protection of the laws and of his
    privileges as an American citizen, contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment
    and R.S. 1978.
    Petitioners press three attacks on the Alien Land Law as it has been applied
    in this case: first, that it deprives Fred Oyama of the equal protection of the
    laws and of his privileges as an American citizen; secondly, that it denies
    Kajiro Oyama equal protection of the laws; and, thirdly, that it contravenes
    the due process clause by sanctioning a taking of property after expiration of
    the applicable limitations period. Proper foundation for these claims has been
    laid in the proceedings below.

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen