Consistent Quality Through Chan TimesSix Distinct Advantages Why You Should Opt for High Quality Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) (Precast Concrete Hollow Block) ‘Structural strength “The excelent manviacturing process of tg Besser Plant (made in U.S.A) produces qualily and high strength concrete masonry units. These CMU have a minimum compressive strength of 7Nmm (1000ps!) and are relable and predctabo undor comprassWve and tenslesresses. Economy ‘Al CMU fora gven size are of exact dimensions and this mskes bocklaying 20 much easier and foster. Compared to normal bricks, the size ofthe CMU are about ve times larger In surace area, enabling faster completon of work, Bocase a the high compresave length. the Blocks are not easy «damaged by ough nanding on sf. Hence, wastage Is minimal. Transporiaton of palletsod blocks furter reduces breakages. ll hese help you eave terms of materia, labour, time and costs Sound Insulation ‘Du to the high donsky and hollow caves, 2 CMU wall has exellent sound insulation, These sound inulin propertios Keep your working and living ‘environment quiet and poscof, an important coneidoration In terrace housing, soheo, eparimental and nda busing. (ACOUSTIC TEST REPORT avalabi upon request) Excellent Therm! Insutatior CHU provice netural thre insulation duc to presonce of trapped dead air in the cavities. In the hot tropics a CMU building is cooler and more Comforable than @ conventional bling. A cistnct advantage It cooing inctalons are required resulting i lower iil istallston coste and lower ‘energy coneumpton, (THERMAL MEASUREMENT REPORT avaiable upon request) Fire Resistence ‘CMU offer excellent fr resistance. CMU is incombustble and could rot starr spresd a fire. OMU i rarely omaged by tre, K does not buckle ike ste, ‘pal ke renforce concrete or bun tke timber” ‘Other Uses (CMU are ideal for reinforced masonry stuctires. Ste! reinforcement canbe installed Inthe caves ofthe CMU and the same grouted thus enhancing its ‘ienurl and tensile resistance. Ths eiminstes the use of shutlering oF form wore and the constuction period and cost can be furher reduced. Some applications of reinforced masonry Using CMU are loae-bearing wal In non stam constuction are realing wal erutues. Products Certified by SIRIM QAS S/B Sn wo 0 90 o| hs 5 1401 0mm Ful Block 1201 114mm Fut Block $1501 F4Onm Pal Blok 5.2001 19000 Ful Block ed el Ze so feo $1002 Hal Block 8.12.02 Half Block $1502 Help Bock 0 we su x ZZ $ 10.03 Bond Beam 8 12.03 Knock Ou Bond Beam $15.03 Knock Out Bond Beam CMU Solid Block S188Yeo sas ‘1805 U Bond Beam Block 15.13 Rock Face Chanel Black] $154 Acoustic Block Eee kor 5 20 Hol Line Block | _08200pen End Block _ | $2005 U Bond Bear Block 5 2001 Single Scored FB Facing Block $20.12 Rock Face Chawel lot] RC20.02 Rook Face Half Bloc 190 gk 100 180} 19040 40 gg 100 ‘€@ eo | tao. | 100) + so} SISO1F Fiued Block | $1502F Fluted Half Block | RC152 Rock Face Comer Blok} RCIS.02 Rock Face Hal Bock | RC2.22 Rock Face Comer Back * Al dimension io mn Technical Data for Concrete Masonry Units ‘All Zenbes conerete masonry units are certifed by SIRIM QAS, complying to BS 476 part 22, 1957 BS 6073 part 1, 1981. Compressive Strength: ‘Minimum compressing strength of block shall be 7N/mm? (1000psi) Higher strength blacks can be manufactured under prior special order. Dimensional Tolerance Length ++3mm -Smm Height ++3mm 5mm Width (Thickness) 2mm ‘Average 4mm at any individual point Drying Shrinkage ying shrinkage of block shall not exceed 0.06% “Fire Rated! Bomba Cerificate: 1-4 hours BS 476 part 22, 1987 Other Test Report: 1) H20 Absorption 2) Modular Coordination 3) Thermal 4) Acoustic* Special design/ dimensions, high strength blocks can be supplied upon request * Since 1999, Zenbes CMU blocks are being exported to Singapore ® ‘Manufacturer of ierocing Concrete Paver and Concrete Masonry Units ZENBES SDN BHD (1622427) Factory Lot 3005, 1 1/2 Milestone, Jalan Lahat, 31300 Simpang Pulal, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia, ‘Tol: 6 (05) 957 3628/7/4 Fax: 6(05) 357 2258 E-malt zenbesip@streamyx.com K.LOffice 44, 1st Floor, Jalan Tun Sambanthan 3, Brickfiolds, 50470 Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia, Tel: 6 (03) 2273 2649/ 4988 Fax: 6 (03) 2273 4989 E-mail: zonbes@streamyx.com vwwrw.zenbes.comPe rey pm pcg py pag FATS RE |__| ees pete po TEST REPORT FOR FERE RESISTANCE TEST SIRIM. QAS International Sdn. Bhd. " Building:14, SIRIM Complex 1, Persiaran Dato’ Menteri P.O.Box 7035, Section 2 : 40941 Shah Alam‘ Ey Selangor Darul Ehsan Hee MALAYSIA._he ee ye eyes yey tes SIRIM QAS International Sdn. Bhd, iz one. E 2 E = TEST REPORT REPORTNO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 1 OF 22 This Testegod veers only sarplos scbmied by te appicant W Sil GAS inamatoral Gah Bhd ard loved by SIA OR Inxeenaiona Se. Gh. Tris Tes! Repor shal oot be reproduced, except fll an shall not be Used for advereing purposes by any ‘means or foms without writen spproval trom Executive Directo of SIRIM OAS Intematnal Sen. Sh. Please refer ovetleal for cancion relating to the use of Tet Repo. Our Ref Issued by Issued date Product Retirence Standard Method of est Applicant Description of test Specimen Date received Job No. 155060162 he| ZAINI AHMAD Senior Technical Executive SQAS / FET/I5/1-3 Fire Engineering Testing Seetion 26 SEP 2005 Precast Concrete Masonry Unit-Hollow Blocks (with stee] reinforcement) BS 476:Part 22:1987 Methods for determination of the fire resistance of non-load bearing elements of construction, Clause 5 ~ Determination of fire resistance of partition. ZENBES SDN. BHD. PT. 3005, 1 % Milestone, Jalan Lahat, 31300 Simpang Pulsi, Perak Darul Ridzuan. (Attn: Mr. Terry Yip) Anon-load bearing block wall partition system was constructed with Precast concrete masonry unit ~ hollow blocks (with steel reinforcement) in which two units of reinforcement steel bars (said to be Y12 bar) of @12mm were placed vertically in the cavity of the blocks end bonded together by cement and send mortar on the 1" of August, 2005, ‘The blocks were sampled by Mr. Mohd Shaharin Ahmad Latif of Product Certification Section, SIRIM QAS Intemational Sdn. Bhd, on the 20° May, 2005 and the test was requested through PP2 Form ~ (Ref: PZ 001301 dated 1 Sane, 2005), Full description of tie test specimen and construction of the block wall are detailed in Page 4 and 5 of this report Brand: ZENBES Model: S15-FB Size : 390mm (1) x 140mm (W) x 190mm (H) 04.07.2008 ENGINEERING | TESTING = ROHAYA IBRAHIM Senior Mabager Fire Engineering Testing Section ‘Testing Services Department SIRIM QAS INTERNATIONAL SDN. BHD.TEST REPORT REPORT NO. 2005FE0255 PAGE: 2 OF 22 ‘Tis Toit Repot raters ony fo saiipies Submited by ha appleant to SIAIM GAS Intoratonal SGh BE and tated by SIRIM GRE {rtematonal Sdn, Ghd. Ths Test Repon shall not be reprecvced, except i ful and hal ol be used for advertising purposes ty any means cforms without writen approval om Exgeutve Decor o Applicant Summary Date of Test Secor te IFIM QAS international San Bh ZENBES SD! N. BHD. A specimen of non-load bearing block wall partition system, has been subjected to a test in accordance with BS 476: Part 22:1987, Clause 5 to determine its fie resistance performance. The non-losd bearing block wall partition consisted of precast concrete masonry unit ~ hollow blocks (with steel reinforcement), each of size 390mm (L) x 140mm (W) x 191mm (i) The hollow blocks were laid in the specified location at the test frame end bonded together by cement and sand mortar of 1:3 ratio of approximately 10mm thick. Two units of reinforced steel bars (said to be ¥12 bar) with 212mm of 280mm (length) were placed vertically in the cavities of the blocks as shown in Figure 4, Each unit of the reinforced steel bar consists of two steel bars having length of 2100mm and 1400mm respectively which were tied together with stee! wires. The vertical cevity of the panicular blocks with the steel bar is grouted with cement, sand and granite chipping of 1;3:2 ratio to form a solid concrete and the compressive strength of the concrete cube of the grouting was found to be 21.0 MNim* * (refer to SIRIM Test Report No.: 2005CBD042 dated 2” September, 2005), The reinforcement stcel bars were located at 690mm and 910mm from the left edge and right edge side of the test frame respectively. Both sides of the block wall panttion were plastered to an average thickness of 12.5mm. ‘The blocks were claimed to be processed from the following materials and proportioned respectively as stated :~ Ne. Materials ‘Mix ratio By Weigh) Sand 629kg Granite Chipping 385kg Cement 99kg Agmixture 50m! The block density ang the concrete density in oven-dried condition were found (0 be 1564 kg/m’ and 2249 kg/m’ respectively. The blocks were sampled by Mr. Mohd Sheharin Ahmad Latif of Product Certification Section, STRIM QAS International Sdn. Bhd. on the 20" May, 2005 and the test was requested through PP2 Form ~ (Ref.: PZ, 001301 dated 1° June, 2008). ‘The specimen satisfied the performance requirements specified in Clause 5 of BS 476: Part 22, for non-load bearing wall partition, for the following periods: Integr i 130 minutes Insulation; 130 minutes The test was discontinued after s period of 130 minutes at the request of the applicant. re 02.09.2005 Kg “Sy ENGINEERING || ESTING SECTION 26 SEP 2005TEST REPORT REPORTNO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 3 OF 22 THis Tesi Repor Tears Sy wo samples eUbintd by fs applicant to SIA GAS Tninetcoal Sah PG. ond WHT by STANTS] 'rternationa! Sun. Bhd. Ths Test Repon shal not be reproduced, excert in full and shal not be used for advertising purposes by any means of loms without writen aperoval on Excuse rector of SIAM GAS Intemetionl Sdn, Oh, 1 PURPOSE OF TEST To determine the fire resistance of the block wall partition system when tested in accordance with BBS _476:Part 22:1987 “Methods for determination of the fire resistance of non-loed bearing elements of construction: Clause 5 ~ Determination of the fire resistance of partition’, ‘TEST SPECIFICATION BS 476:Pant 22:1987 states that the fire resistance of the specimen is the time, expressed in minutes, 10 failures under the following criteria; 21 Integrity 2.1.1 In general a failure of the test construction to maintain integrity shall be deemed to have occurred when collapse or sustained flaming for more than 10s on the unexposed face. 2.1.2 Under criteria for impermeability, failure shall be deemed to have occurred when one or other of the following conditions prevail 4) where cotton pad test is performed, flames and/or hot gases cause flaming and glowing of the cotton pad b) where the use of cotton pad is not suitable, felure shall be deemed to have occurred when either: * a through gap into the furnace exceeding 6mm in width and 150mm ia length exists or developes in the specimen; or * + a through gap into the furnace exceeding 25mm in diameter exists or develops in the specimen. Insulation Failure shall be deemed to have occurred when one of the following occurs :- a) if the mean unexposed face temperature increases by more than 140°C above its initial value b) if the temperature recorded at any position on the unexposed face is in excess of 180°C above the initial mean unexposed face température. ) when integrity failures as defined in 2.1 occu. ENGINEERING | ye TESTING ‘si 26 SEP 2005TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 4 OF 22 The oper eles only ssinpies SibiTted by The appear STAI GAS Wiemaoral Sah. GAG and Toad by STAI OR letemattonal Stn. Bhd, Ths Test Report shal not be reproduced, excopt in fu and shal rot be used fer scvortaing pupoees by any means ot forms, trout walten approval ron Exeovtve Ovecor o! SiN QAS Inematonat Son Bh 32 ‘TEST SPECIMEN Product Deseription 2 pallets (224 pieces) of precast concrete masonry unit ~ hollow blocks were submitted to the Fire Engincering Testing Section on the 1* of August, 2005. The blocks were of nominal size 390mm (length) x 140mm (width) x 190mm (height). The blocks were claimed to be processed ffom the following materials and proportioned respectively as state Ne: Materials ‘Mix ratio (By Weight) 1. | Sand 629kg 2, | Granite Chipping 385kg 3. | Cement 99kg, 4. [Admixture Omi The deseription of products given above has been prepared from information provided by the applicant of the test Description of Test Specimen ‘The test specimen consisted of a non-load bearing block wall partition system constructed onto the (esl frame. The block wall system was attached to the test frame with cement mortar. The overall specimen size was 3020mm (width) x 3020mmm (length) inclusive of a 40mm wide vertical gap along one edge to provide no lateral restraint to the specimen. Inspection was carried out during the construction of the block wall system to verify on its design, dimensions and materials used. The construction of the wall was arranged and carried out by the applicant and its agent. Detailed drawings of the block wall partition system are as shown in Figure 3 to Pigure 5 MANUFACTURE OF THE TEST CONSTRUCTION The non-loed bearing block wall partition system was constructed with the product as described in 3.1. ‘The average dimensions of block as measured was 390mm (length) x 140mm (width) x 191mm (height). The block density and the concrete density in oven-dried condition were found to be 1564kg/m" and 2249kg/m’ respectively. The moisture content of the block was found to be 1.6%, ; The hollow blocks were laid in the specified location at the test frame and bonded together by cement and sand mortar of 1:3 ratio of approximately 10mm thick. Two units of reinforced steel bats (said to be ¥12 bar) with @12mm of 2800mm (length), were placed vertically in the cavities of the blocks as shown in Figure 4, Each unit of the reinforced steel bar consists of two steel bars and having length of 2100mm and 140mm respectively which were tied together with steel wires. of VW,- 26 SEP 2005TESTREPORT 2005FE0255 PAGE: 56 OF 22 ‘This Tesi Rogar rele oriy to samples sobraed by the applicant To SIRIM GAS llamalional Sn, Ong, and T6HGd by STANT OAS Internationa! Sc Shs. This Test Revort shal rot be reproduced, excep in al and ea not be used for acverising purposes by any means of fos vinout writen approval rom Executive Director of SIFIM GAS ntematonal Sen Bhs ‘The vertical cavity of the particuler blocks with the steel bar is grouted with cement, sand and sranite chipping of 1:3:2 ratio to form a solid concrete and the compressive strength of the concrete cube of the grouting wes found to be 21.0 MN/m? ! (refer to SIRIM Test Report No.: 2005CBD042 dated 2 September, 2005). The block wall partition was plastered with a layer of cement and sand mortar on both the exposed ‘and unexposed faces. The plastering was found to be 12.5mm thiek (average valu). The block wall partition system was constructed with one vertical side free end of 40mm width to be filled with ceramic fiber insulation, 5. CONDITIONING OF T :ONSTRUCTION Prior to test. the test construction was Kept in the laboratory proper and was seasoned in ambient atmosphere fora period of 31 days. 6. FIRE RESISTANCE TEST 6.1 Date of Testing Afier the block wall partition system had seasoned, the fire resistance test was conducted on (02.09.2005 in the presence of the following representatives: 1. Mr. Neil Short. = Zenbes Sdn. Bhd. 2, Mr. Ong Chee Sam Zenbes Sdn, Bhd 6.2 Test Method The test was conducted in accordance with the procedure specified in Clause 5 of BS 476:Part 22: 1987 The ambient temperature at the beginning of the test was 28.6°C and on completion of test, the ambient temperature was 31.3°C. The temperature and pressure conditions were controlled to the limits defined in Clause 3.1 and 3.2 of BS 476:Part 20:1987, Throughout the test, observations were made on the exposed and unexposed faces of the test specimen, In addition, observations were made of any sustained fleming on the unexposed face of the test specimen. Gap gauges were available to evaluate compliances with the requirements for imperviousness as defined in the BS 476:Part 20:1987. Lx{ ENGINEERING vesting |*) 6M 26 SEP 2005fees fee LES HEPOHI REPORTNO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 6 OF 22 “This Test Fepon veleis only to samples SUBmited by the applcant Ws SIAM GAS intomaliohal Son” Bhd and lanea by STANT CAS {ternational Sdn Bho. This Test Report shall not be reorecuced, excep in land shall not be used for advertising purposes by ary moans of forme enthoul writen ageroval ron Executive Oecor of SIRIM OAS Infeational Sn, Bh 1 12 1s 81 82 TEST RESULTS The graph in Figure 1 shows the aet relation to the slandard temperature ternperature/time eurve of the furnace heating conditions in me curve. Table { shows the actual mean furnace temperature and of the standard fumace temperature as defined in Clause 3.1 of BS 476:Part 20:1987. In addition the table shows the percentage differences between the areas under the standard curve and the areas under the actual curve ‘compated with the percentage tolerances allowable within the standard ‘The graph in Figure 2 shows the actual temperature rise recorded on the unexposed face of the test specimen as determined by the five thermocouples which are fixed approximately at the center of the specimen and at the center of the four quarters of the specimen and two additional tHhermovoupfes to record the individual maximum temperature. ‘Table 2 shows individual and mean temperature of the unexposed face of the specimen. In addition, the table shows the increase in mean temperature and maximum temperature at various time intervals, ‘Table 3 shows the deflection of the brick wall measured at mid-height. Observations are made during the test on the general behaviour of the test specimen and these are given in Appendix 1 to this report. Photographs of the test are included as Photo I~ 11 EVALUATION AGAINST THE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ‘The performance of the specimen was judged against the following criteria of BS 476: Part 20 1987 Integrity It is required that there is no collapse Of the specimen, no sustained flaming on the unexposed surface and no loss of impermeability. These requirements were satisfied for 130 minutes after which the test was discontinued, Insulation 1 is required that the mean temperature rise of the unexposed face shall not be greater than 140°C and the maximum temperature rise shall not be greater than 180°C. At 130 minutes of test, the moan temperature rise and maximum temperature rise above initial mean temperature on the ‘unexposed face of the block wall partition system were 76°C and 128°C respectively. 26 SEP 2005ome ines (ems; mein ames mw Com Tame Tames Come Toms Tamla Tes Tem Semele i REPORT NO. TEST REPORT it 2005FE0255 PAGE: 7 OF 22 [itis Fest Regan wees Gaiy Sanes TaBred by The appean w SIRI GAS Tateatonal Sah. BRE and ToHe0 by STMT | tntenctonat San. Bhd. This Test Pepon srl nct be reproduces, excep n ful ana shal net be uted for averting purposes by any [means 10.3 10.2 foums without wren approval rs, Executive Oiector of SIRIM QAS ternational Son, 2 CONCLUSIONS The specimen satisfied the requirements of the BS 476; Part 22:1987 for the following period Integrity : 130 minutes Insulation 130 minutes The test was discontinued after a period of 130 minutes at the request of the applicant. IMITATIONS The results only relate to the behaviour of the specimen of the element of construction under the panicular conditions of test; they ate aot intended to be the sole criteria for assessing the potential fire performance of the element in use nor do they reflect the actual behaviour in fires, ‘The test results relate only to the specimen tested, Appendix A of BS 476:Part 20:1987 provides guidance information on the application of the fire resistance tests and the interpretation of test data, Application of the results to assemblies of different dimensions or incorporating different ‘components should be subjected to re-verification. ENGINEERING ESTING 26 SEP 2005TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 8 OF 22 ‘Tit Test Rape rales onl hples SBA by the apalcant tS STINT GAS Weinahonm SOh_ Gna and tested by STAN GAS Incernatenai San Shs. This Test Report shal not be reproduced, except in ull and shiek nol be used for advertising purposes by any means o forms wihout writen appeoval tom Exoouve Duestr of SIRIM GAS interalionl Sdn, Bhd. 1PPENDIN 1 Observations made during the test ‘Observations from exposed face U- Observations from unexposed face TIME TEST OBSERVATIONS (min) FACE Geel rte “Test commenced. 7 7 ‘Randomized cracks were observed at the block wall surface before the text commenced, 3 Vertical hairline crack is observed near T6 thermocouple, 15 Almost of the plastering at the wall surface has detached and dropped. 19 ‘Vertical hairline crack is observed at the center portion of the block wall Horizontal crack is observed crossing T6 & T7 thermocouples. T7 thermocouple hs detached from its location. Randomized damping spots were observed at the wall surface. Vertical hairline crack is observed near Ti thermocouple, Diagonal hairline crack is observed at the bottom lefi comer of the block wall Diagonal crack is observed at the top left portion of the block wall 1 ‘Damping spots at the wall surface seems to drying. ing Spot ‘No significant changes. Diagonal hairline crack is observed at the bottom left portion of the block wall “The block wall is observed bowing towards the fumace. u E U U u wT U U__~[ Steam released from the top edge of the block wail. U U E U U w 60 ‘The block walt still maintains its insulation and integrity a "T7 has been refixed back to its original location. 80 ‘WE [No significant changes. 87 UJ Imperetrate gep is observed al the top, bottom and left side edge of the block wall . 35 U___| Damping at the wall surface has dried off. 98 UW [Diagonal crack as mentioned at t= 40 mins has increased in size. The gap 15 widen. Tio U___['No significant changes. 120 “The block wall still maintains its insulation and integrity. 130) =| Test was terminated at the request of applicant.‘Yona Tite a ne Dane te Kame Le Gora mee ieee [REPORT NO.: 2005FE0255 Fp (cies Gry lo samples eubried by te apical Yo SIAN OAS Wleraalionel Sén_Ohe” and tasted by SRN GAS TEST REPORT PAGE: 9 OF 22 1. This Test Aopen shal rel be reptocucoa, except ful and shal rl be used ioe advoring puposee by ay vinlen sooreua lcm Exaculve Drestor of SIM QRS Inlaralional Sdn Be TABLE 1: SPECIFIED AND ACTUAL RECORDED FURNACE TEMPERATURE STAROAAD, RETA ARER] —aRER SPEGFES rae | FURNACE Furnace | unoen | uncer [reacenrace| peRCENTAGE| TEMPERATURE | TEVERATUAE [STANDARD] ACTUAL | DEVIATION | TOLERANCE CURVE } CURVE [nes (Deg) (0690) | Deg Cma| (Cog Gmiey (sory) Lo 20 35 7 345 147 3 020 | 51490 29 15 1490.0 | 155280 | 02 10 so4e7.5 | 942700 | 0.8 = 26 SEP 2005 Nae a\ SEs Oe TION &é-_ a im im im ie TEST REPORT REPORTNO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 10 OF 22 This Test Rapa velas ani wo Saris submiiod by the applicant Wo SIRIM GAS Tetemavonal Saw BhG_ and Weled by STAI GAS Ioterattonal Scn. Bret This Test Report shall nt be reproduced, except n full apd shall act be used for adverlsing purposes by any ‘means of frrs without writen approval fom Executive Dveclor of SIRIM GAS Intemational Sdn, Bh TABLE 2: UNEXPOSED FACE TEMPERATURE OF THE BLOCK WALL PARTITI TEMP. FISE ABOVE (nine) [Es ee] Teme, [EAN] aa (degC) | (degC) | (degC) | (cegc) | (degC) | (deg C) | (degC) | (degC) TEMP. TEMP. 10 30 29 30 30 30 31 30 30 oO 4 ee ope pe tet eet et et 90 76 83 114 82 80 82 80 87 57 84 110. 79 EJ 43 [83 et ee 6 Bl $8 116 Note 1) Thermocouples 71 to TS were used to assess the ability of the block wall partition system to satisty the mean unexposed surface temperature criterion, 2) Thermocouples Tt to T7 were used to assess the abilty of the block wall partition system to satisty the maximum unexposed surface temperature criterion. 8) NR = No recording recorded i 26 SEP 2005TEST REPORT | REPORT NO.: 2008FE0255 PAGE: 11 OF 22 “Thi Tesi Ropar ‘lore only To campice evamited by the applicant STAIN OAS Inemaonal Sdh_Dhd, and ested by STANT OAS Intersstonal San Bnd This Test Pepon shal not be eepoduced, excep kl an shall Not be Usod for advenieing purposes by any means 0: forms wings ween approval om Execulve Orector of SIRI OAS inrmational Son, Gh TABLE 3: RECORDED DEFLECTION OF THE BLOCK WALL, PARTITION TOWARDS THE FURNACE MEASURING POINTS TIME x 6 c 5 (mins) _| (emmy fmm) | (mm | mm) 10 5 o Tt 10 20 7 25 a ar 30 a2 5 68 67 40, 0 63 80 78 50 48 73. ot a7, 60, 50 80, 98 Es 70. 52 a3, 403) 400 80 35 EJ 108. 403) 90 87 92. 13. 107 i} 58 34 715 110) 110 59 96. 113 a1 120 59. 98, 9 113 NOTE: * Measured deflection value in mr, 26 SEP 2008TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 12 OF 22 ‘Tie Teel Report roles only to samples subraRed By the appicant te SIRIM GAS wiemalional Gan, Bhd and tated By SRW GAS Intemational San. Ghd, This Test Report shal not be reproced,exoept in hil and shall not be used fer averting purpoves By oy means o fos without wien approval rom Executive Drectr of SIRIM GAS Intematenal Sdn. Bhd, fi FIGURE 1: ACTUAL FURNACE TEMP.J TIME CURVE, 1200 +1000 FURNACE AVERAGE TEMP, + FURNACE STANDARD TEMP, “FURNACE STANDARD TEMP, UL FURNACE STANDARD TEM, Li. 120055060162 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8 9 100 110 120 190 ‘TIME (mins) ENGINEERING TESTING oars fg) 28 SEP 2005 ee ee TEMPERATURE) 7 8 3 8 | ; : | i1ES1 KEFURI REPORT NO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 13 OF 22 "Tis Tesl Reged valor only © saapica sibetied by the apphoart t STRUM OAS tnernational Sen. hd. and teaed by SIAM GAS Inzerational Sdn. Bhé, The Teet Report ehall not be reproduced, except in ful and chal not be weed for advertizing pupasee by any aang of forme without writen aporoval tom Executve Dect of SIRIM QAS Intrnatonal Sdn. Bh. a a a oe ee eee FIGURE 2. UNEXPOSED FACE TEMPERATURE CURVE Temperature rise above inal mean temperature TTI 40 120 100 8 TEMPERATURE RISE (‘C) 0 10 2 30 4 50 69 7 80 90 100 140 120 190 ‘TALE (ming) Fine he / ENGINEERING a\ gesting *] B\ secrion Je 26 SEP 2005TEST REPORT PAGE: 14 OF 22 REPORTNO.: 2005FE0255 “Ts Test Report roles only samples submifed By te appecant Te GIAINT OAS Wernaional Sah. Bhd. and tested by STFMt GAS International Son. Bho. This Test Report shal nat be reproduced, except in full and shal rot ba used for edvertsing purposes by any ‘maane or toms without weten approval em Executive Diastr cf SIAM GAS Intemational Sch. 40 Soe GENES LE Pine UNEXPOSED FACE hi ENGIeEa| (+) Thermocouple points on the unexposed face. ZESTING (-) Deflection points on the unexposed face NOTE : 1. All dimensions are in mm. : Drawing not to scale GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF THE BLOCK WALL PARTITION SYSTEM = a 6 SEP 2005 Figure 3 :ae SB! SS S|. Se eee oe TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 15 OF 22 ait Te Daly Wo SaNGleS SubmTOd by Wie apHuCATT Wo STAT GAS WierhaUenal Si. GAG and Tesi by SN GAS ai Sen Bhd. This Test Repon sia not be repeovuoed, excep in UE and shall rat be used for advertising pupases by ary fous without waten aperovat orn Execuive Dest of SIFIM QAS Intertaboral Su. Bb Precast beg 7 Conerete r Masonry ait — TT Hollow Block | |-—Plaster B (Cement and Sand mortar) {cement ana |__| |. Roinroreement Sand mortar [steel Bar, 12mm dia Infilled with Cement end — Sand growling SECTION B-B EXPOSED FACE NOTE | jut dimensions are in mm 2, Drawing not to seale Figure 4: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION OF PRECAST CONCRETE MASONRY EINFORCEMENT of. 4 “26 SEP 2005TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: 2005FE0255 PAGE: 16 OF 22 “Thi Teal Hepon eies Gry Sarapes submited bythe appear to STAIN GAS faerational Su BRE and tested by SIA CAS International Son Bho. This Test Repo shal not be reproguved, excopt full and shall not be used for averting purposes by any [Limzans or forms winoot witen aperoval fem Executive Drestr of SIRIM OAS Infemgtgnal Sdn. Bhd, eS i is 0 ae ToP_VEK LE | BER 300 140 Tne NB Lx [ enone vesting /*| ERONT VIEW smevien — \§\ secnon /s, a ‘ OS NOTE : 4, All dimensions are in mm. 2! Drewing not to scale Figure 5: DETAIL OF PRECAST CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT HOLLOW BLOCK oF. u- 6 SEP 2005q 1 ‘ea Phot 1: The exposed face of the blo esREPORT 10. Photo 3: A about 15 minutes of test.ST REPORT PAG bee” Let te 5 fwemt—ne—henfmneamtRit”intRane feePhoto 8: At about 90 minutes of test(EST REPeer PhotoSUID QAS Internationa Sn Bhd, Company 80: ALONE) Na Pessares Duta" Monten, PO Box 7035, Section "40913 Stah Alam, Selangor Dan Ehsn. Maly Tel no: 03. S534645L Favre. cassauico TEST REPORT REPORT NO : 2005CBD042 PAGE: 1 OF This Test Report refers only to samyples submited by the applicant to STREM GAS Interutional Sdn. Bhd. and tested by SEREM QAS Tnterattensh Sin, Bha, This test repor! shall nae be esproduce, except fll and shall not be used for advertsig purposes by aay cane o forme without writen approval ions Rxeeweve Director, SIREN QAS Eateraatonal Sén. Bhs Applicant : FIRE TESTING SECTION STRIM QAS INTERNATIONAL SDN. BHD. Manufacturer : ZENBES SDN. BHD, Lot 3005, 1% Milestone, Jalan Lahat, 31300 Sirapang Puli, Perak Darul Ridzuan Product Concrete Cubes Reference Standard’ MS 26 : Part2: 1991 Method of test + Method of testing concrete Part 2 : Method of testing hardened concrete. Section three : Method for determination of the compressive strength of concrete cubes, Description ofsample 3 nos of concrete cubes were received for testing ‘The test was requested by En. Mohd Hafiz bin Meh of Fire Testing Services Department , SIRIM QAS International Sdn. Bh. through PP2 form (ret. 120055050162) dated 03/08/2005 Date received 03.08.2005 : Job noJRef. no. + §2005504D030 / ( SQAS! CBMT/T.REC/CSL Issued date 2 gn’ Agproved Signatories (HM RAJA NORSIHA) pb esuertsMall) (senior Manager Building Materials Testing Section ing Services DepartmentTEST REPORT [ REPORT No. 2005CBD042 PAGE: 2 OF 2 ud tated by SIRIN QA eceng parposes By 20) pirat Sd | anus Tes Report refers ony 0 samples sited bythe apgbean SURES Tnuernsdonsl Str, Bhd This tse repert stall not be reproduced, excep in ful ai shal nt be wed fo aa fans without written approval rom Exeeatve Director, SHRM QS Internationa Sen. Bl STH OF CONCRETE CUBE! COMPRESSIVE ST} Submittor By 1 ZENBES SDN. BED. No. of Specimen: 3 nos ine of Specimen: 100 mim x 100 mm x 100 mm Casting Date + 1.8,2005 Testing Date + 29,8.2005 Specimen | Compressive T Compressive | Reference Load Strength | Hee (KN) ____QvINI ) | 1 149.6, 15.0 | 2 es us 3 236.7 Average