Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TheResearch
Proposal
LGBTQ
Communi
ty and
Recovery
of
Substanc
es
Abstract
The study is trying to determine if having a specific substance abuse
treatment for queer individuals increases positive experience in treatment as
well as if it increases chances for long term sobriety. The independent
variable in this study is substance abuse treatment. The dependent variable
is the experiences in treatment and long term recovery outcomes. There is
also a control comparison group which would be the heterosexual group that
goes through the regular religiously affiliated treatment center program. The
methods used included having multiple specifically chosen demographic
groups take different forms of treatment. To learn about peoples experiences
and to learn about sobriety outcomes the study used surveys to obtain the
information. The value of the expected outcomes would be finding more
effective routes for substance abuse treatment for queer individuals.
Introduction and review of the literature
The questions this study is trying to answer are: does having a
substance abuse treatment specifically for queer individuals significantly
increase positive experiences in treatment? Does it increase chances of long
term sobriety for queer individuals? The hypothesis of this study is the more
intently the substance abuse treatment addresses an individuals identity
specifically the needs of queer identified individuals the more positive they
will likely feel about their treatment experience. It is also hypothesized that
the more intently the treatment also tends to the specific needs of queer
individuals the greater likelihood that they will participate in long term
recovery. The independent variable in this study is substance abuse
treatment. The dependent variable is the experiences in treatment and long
term recovery outcomes. There is also a control comparison group which
would be the heterosexual group that goes through the regular religiously
affiliated treatment center program.
study found that folks in the sample who were treated in a specialized LGBT
substance abuse program or group were more likely to report being
abstinent later in life and reported higher levels of both therapeutic support
and connection and lower levels of leaving treatment. The study actually
found that the specialized treatment was the only factor that was a
significant predictor of the persons current abstinence. The study also found
that being bisexual was a negative predictor of abstinence at the end of
treatment. This indicated to the author that it may be due to encountering
more difficulties in treatment than gay individuals. This also implies that
bisexual individuals have different needs than gay individuals, even though
the two groups are viewed as a unified group with no specialized services for
bisexual individuals (Senreich , 2009). Due to the lack of acknowledgment of
trans or gender non-conforming folks or others in within the queer
community it could be assumed that these individuals would potentially
encounter more barriers than even bisexual individuals in treatment. This
would need to be researched more for those populations and their
experiences. This contributed to my study because I wanted to represent
different identities within the queer community and see if the identities had
different results in response to the different forms of treatment options.
An article thats focus was on influences, treatment and
prevention for addiction in LGBT communities brought up the historical
factors that can potentially lead to substance abuse in this population. The
article also talked about unique cultural features that could also contribute to
substance abuse which in turn would need culturally sensitive treatment. It
also addressed social and interpersonal stressors on LBGT folks that can lead
to substance abuse and the importance of overcoming discrimination inside
and outside the walls of treatment programs. This author also commented on
the lack of literature on transgender folks, but also failed to mention other
folks in the queer community that are not talked about such as gender nonconforming or A sexual or pan sexual etc. This author also talked about the
identities. It would also mean that support systems would need to educate
themselves on substance effects and effective treatments for these
substances (Rowen, 2014). This article laid the foundation in my study to be
about various levels of support. I wanted to test how various kinds of
treatment support affected the queer community. I wanted to measure
likelihood of better treatment experiences in relation to treatment geared
specifically to an individuals gender identity. This article also showed the
importance of allowing an individual to be their own voice in reporting how
treatment is going/effecting them.
Method or study design
With all the information gathered from above the following study design was
created.
Sample selection
Each group would consist of 12 participants. So there would be a total
of 60 participants. The various treatment options would be paid for by the
research study for the participants involvement in the study. The study
would be advertised to treatment facilities and to social service agencies
around the US to gain participants. Participants would not have to have all
the same start dates; this will allow all participants to start as soon as they
are able to avoid them changing their mind in starting their recovery
process.
Participant demographics
The participant demographics would consist of a heterosexual group
that would be a quota sample of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Minneapolis was
chosen because it is one of the few locations of a queer specific substance
abuse treatment center. The other 4 group demographics would consist of 2
gay identified men, 2 lesbian identified women, 2 Trans men, 2 Trans women,
2 gender non-conforming, and 2 other queer identified folks.
treatment center with a LGBT support group available. The third group would
go to a regular religiously affiliated treatment center with a LGBT support
group option. The fourth group would go to a regular religiously affiliated
treatment center without any LGBT option. The 5th group which consists of
heterosexuals who would go to a regular religiously affiliated treatment
center.
The participants will take their first survey half way through their
treatment experience and again at the end of treatment. The participants
will take 2 more surveys 3 months and 6 months after completing treatment
to have a better understanding of the sustainability of participants recovery.
The reason the 3rd & 4th queer group and the heterosexual group are
in religiously affiliated treatment programs is because they are the most
common forms of treatment available in the US. Religiously based substance
abuse treatment largely stems from historical contexts of religious treatment
centers and AA/12 steps being written by two religious straight, white,
middle class men.
Prediction of study outcome
The expected outcome would be that queer individuals would have
better treatment outcomes and experiences if they went to an exclusively
queer inpatient treatment center. If the expected outcome does occur and
this study supports the hypothesis it would hopefully lead to exclusively
queer treatment centers becoming more accessible. One of the ways queer
treatment centers could become more accessible would be if more queer
treatment centers were created. Another way would be if transportation to
these treatment centers was covered. Another accessibility issue that would
need to be addressed is insurance and if they will help cover specialized
treatment centers.
Discussion of the significance of expected results
The results of the study would be applied to the human service field of
substance abuse and addiction. If human service professionals want every
person to have an equal chance to having a successful recovery we would
need to offer the most effectively known treatment. It would be unethical to
ignore the results of the study and not give queer individuals adequate
access to substance abuse treatment specific to their needs if it was found
that specific LGBT treatment showed a significant difference in outcomes.
This study would contribute a lot in terms of available data. The data
currently available in various library data bases in fairly limited. We are
currently at the point where people are starting to ask these kinds of
research questions and are starting to find this information. My study will
help build that library on LGBTQ topics/ substance abuse topics.
Limitations of the study
The limitations of this study include but are not limited to the planned
and crafted participant demographics of the queer groups. This might not
have the most accurate depiction of a whole group of people and would need
to have this study re-done or have similar studies done to help validate this
studies results.
One of the limitations of the study is that in theory people not from the
state of Minnesota who participated might have more self-driven motivation
for treatment because it is likely that the queer participants might be coming
from out of state to participate and might not have had the opportunity
otherwise. Due to this, the queer participants might have started the study
with more self-motivation than the heterosexual comparison group. Another
limitation is that the Pride Institute treatment center only has 8 beds
available at a time and so at this point it would not realistically be able to
take in 12 participants for the study.
A few other limitations include the survey questions which might not
have been all-inclusive of experience differences. The survey questions also
might have been leading to the participants. The study might not have had
the most accurate budget, so the budget should attempt to be higher in
order to make sure all costs would be covered. Another limitation might be
unexpected costs. People might leave treatment early and might refuse to
participate in the study after leaving treatment. Survey questions would
have questions about if participants wanted to leave or did leave treatment
or relapsed or wanted to relapse, but the limitation might be finding and
getting people to participate in the survey after leaving treatment.
Other limitations would include the study not following them for up to 5
years after the study, checking in with the participants once every year.
Another limitation would be not including other factors that might lead to a
relapse throughout treatment or after treatment. Are the relapse triggers
related to gender identity?
Another limitation that isnt factored in is when they leave treatment
did they stay in areas that supported queer sobriety? Did they go back
home? What environments are they around after treatment and how do
those spaces factor into long term recovery or relapse?
Conclusion
Assuming that the study indicated that queer individuals do show
significantly better outcomes and experiences with a LGBT specific treatment
center, it would prove a basis for creating more LGBT specific treatment
centers. Advocating & creating more LGBT specific treatment centers around
the US would make this form of treatment more accessible to those that
would benefit from this treatment. In making this option more accessible by
location there is higher potential that state insurance might be able to cover
this treatment. If state insurance still wouldnt cover an individual to access
this treatment, this study would allow for the argument of ethics in terms of
what is known to be more beneficial for queer individuals success in
recovery. The hope is that this study would help lead the way for LGBT
References
Evan Senreich (2009) Demographic, Background, and Treatment Factors
That Affect Gay and Bisexual Clients in Substance Abuse Programs, Journal of
LGBT Issues in Counseling, 3:3-4, 177-197, DOI
10.1080/15538600903347371
Michael P. Chaney & Michael D. Brubaker (2012) addiction in LGBTQ
Communities: Influences, Treatment, and Prevention, Journal of LGBT Issues
in Counseling, 6:4, 234-236, DOI:10.1080/15538605.2012.725649
Cochran, B., Peavy, M., & Santa, A. (2007). Differentiating LGBT Individuals in
Substance Abuse Treatment: Analyses Based on Sexuality and Drug
Preference. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling. DOI:
10.1300/J463v03n02_07
Brian J. Drew. (2012) A Review of Gay Men And Substance Abuse: A Basic
Guide for Addicts and Those Who Care for Them, Journal of LGBT issues in
counseling, 6:1, 86-90, DOI:10.1080/15538605.2011.629168
Noell L. Rowan & Sandra S. Butler (2014). Resilience in Attaining and
Sustaining Sobriety Among Older Lesbians With Alcoholism, Journal of
Gerontological Social Work, 57:2-4,176-197, DOI:
10.1080/01634372.2013.859645
PRIDE Institute: Creating a Healthy LGBT Community (n.d.). Retrieved
November 29, 2014, from http://pride-institute.com/about/lgbt-treatmentcenters-locations/