Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Client Needs
Top legal needs include:
ODSP
Landlord/Tenant
Employment
Housing
WSIB
Human Rights
CPP
Poverty
Difficulty paying for utilities (internet, phone, electricity)
Lack of affordable, accessible transportation options
Inaccessible office spaces
Lack of awareness of services
Lack of community supports (for mental health, housing, employment,
from their doctors)
Stigma
Complicated and confounding systems (ODSP, OW, Legal Aid)
Difficulty obtaining, maintaining, and keeping housing
Difficulty finding employment
How do most clients know they have a legal problem in the first
place?
Some clients claimed they just knew they their rights were being
violated, or that they had better get legal help when fighting a
government agency
Most clients discovered they had a legal issue at the same time they
found out about the clinic, i.e. through word of mouth through others
who have used the clinic, or referral from another agency
Location
Where clinics were closely located to bus routes or other services,
clients were generally happy with their current location
Some clients were unhappy with locations that are inaccessible to
people with injuries, people who use wheelchairs, walkers
Lack of parking was mentioned by clients in more rural areas
Clients were generally satisfied with satellite locations
Opinions on proximity to other services, or co-location with other
services, were quite mixed
Most clients were pleasantly surprised and said the clinic staff
exceeded their expectations
Clients often expressed feeling hopeless, giving up
Felt they were finally heard at their legal clinic
Clinics stand out from other service agencies in staff willingness to
listen and advocate
Many people got help from the clinic after a long frustrating road of
not getting what they needed
Non-lawyer Staff
Clients had mixed opinions on having more non-lawyer staff at
clinics
Mental health, housing, and social workers came up the most, but
opinions about these were mixed.
Technology
Cannot replace front-line services
Opinions were quite mixed for all options discussed
Video-conferencing
Pro: some saw it as a good way of addressing transportation, time, and
anxiety barriers, and connecting with experts and services in urban
centres
Con: some saw it as awkward, confusing, inaccessible, unreliable
Both supporters and opponents were mixed between people who had
used video-conferencing with other service providers and those who
had never used it before
For video-conferencing to be truly accessible, it needs to be available in
private rooms at community access points outside the home
Technology
Enhanced website, more work online
Some people never used the website and were ambivalent
Others felt the website would be a great resource for information,
especially for people who have trouble getting to clinic location(s)
Others felt an enhanced website would detract from core services
Clients mentioned accessibility issues, especially for rural clients:
access to internet, computers