0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
86 Ansichten1 Seite
Penderecki's Canon received the first prize in a competition in Kraków in 1962. The premiere of the Canon aroused major controversy, with both enthusiasm and shouting/whistling from the audience. Critics questioned whether the complex polyphonic transformations in the piece could even be perceived audibly. However, the effects of the sophisticated composition procedures appeared quite "simple" in reception. Penderecki arranges bruitist sonorities and noises according to the rules of Renaissance counterpoint, multiplying appearances of the theme and its counterpoints through inversion and inverted retrograde.
Penderecki's Canon received the first prize in a competition in Kraków in 1962. The premiere of the Canon aroused major controversy, with both enthusiasm and shouting/whistling from the audience. Critics questioned whether the complex polyphonic transformations in the piece could even be perceived audibly. However, the effects of the sophisticated composition procedures appeared quite "simple" in reception. Penderecki arranges bruitist sonorities and noises according to the rules of Renaissance counterpoint, multiplying appearances of the theme and its counterpoints through inversion and inverted retrograde.
Penderecki's Canon received the first prize in a competition in Kraków in 1962. The premiere of the Canon aroused major controversy, with both enthusiasm and shouting/whistling from the audience. Critics questioned whether the complex polyphonic transformations in the piece could even be perceived audibly. However, the effects of the sophisticated composition procedures appeared quite "simple" in reception. Penderecki arranges bruitist sonorities and noises according to the rules of Renaissance counterpoint, multiplying appearances of the theme and its counterpoints through inversion and inverted retrograde.
For his Strophes, Psalms of David, Emanations, Threnody and Canon,Penderecki
received six awards between 1959 and 62. The Canon was the last to be awarded: It won the first prize in a Krakw-based competition under the patronage of Pendereckis former teacher, Artur Malawski. The door to a great international career lay open for the composer. The distinctions he garnered in the later period only enhanced his status as an eminent representative of contemporary culture. Rarely did the first performance of one of his works not arouse major controversy. This, however, did not hamper his spectacular career; on the contrary, it added a dynamic element to his artistic profile. After the premiere of the Canon, opinions were greatly divergent, and the atmosphere bordered on scandal. Alongside enthusiasm, there was shouting and whistling. The debate in the press concentrated on audible qualities of the piece in the context of the composers commentary in the Warsaw Autumn programme book, in which he explained the strictly imitative, canonic structural principle of his piece, presenting himself as an heir to and extender of the Franco-Flemish or Netherlands School. Critics questioned the possibility of auditory perception of such complex polyphonic transformations. Paradoxically, in reception the effects of those sophisticated composition procedures appeared quite simple. The auditory level conceals a deep structure: the canon of the title, in which the number of parts, through the application of two live tapes, mounts up to 208. Penderecki arranges bruitist sonorities and noises in accordance with the rules of Renaissance counterpoint, multiplying the appearances of the theme and its counterpoints, for example in inversion and inverted retrograde. One notable quality the composer described is its three-dimensional, spatial character, achieved through the use of tapes and two groups of speakers. It is that spatial quality that makes for a unique auditory experience, even if the multiplication of sources is only one of many elements in the works construction.