Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2
Sample
The information gathered for this research was collected from participants in a residential
treatment center. Participants upon arrival at this center filled out an intake form reporting
general demographic information, such as age and gender. In addition to this information the
participants were given the Trauma Symptoms Scale as a pre and post-test. This tests for
frequency of behaviors such as nightmares, flash backs, and outbursts. Following the completion
of the intake process participants were randomly placed into routine treatment and new treatment
groups, as well as into one of three cabins. During treatment, information was gathered to assess
the impact previous trauma experiences had on present serious behavioral incidences, how the
assigned treatment group impacted earning off campus visits, as well as if gender impacted the
number of serious behavioral incidents displayed.
Descriptive statistics were collected to aid in identifying the demographics of the sample.
The total number of participants was 50, with 25 being female and 25 being male. Table 1
below states the number of males and females participating in the study.
Table One:
Table Two below displays the age of the participants to range from 7 to 15. This is a
wide range, yet when looked at statistically the mean, median and mode all remain very similar.
Table three displays this data.
Table Two:
Age
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
7.00
4.0
4.0
4.0
8.00
6.0
6.0
10.0
9.00
16.0
16.0
26.0
10.00
11
22.0
22.0
48.0
11.00
18.0
18.0
66.0
12.00
10.0
10.0
76.0
13.00
14.0
14.0
90.0
14.00
6.0
6.0
96.0
15.00
4.0
4.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
Table Three:
Statistics
Age
N
Valid
Missing
50
0
Mean
10.8400
Median
11.0000
Mode
10.00
The ethnicity of the participants is displayed in the pie chart in Table 4. This group was
diversified with the largest percentage of the members being Caucasian, followed by African
American and then Hispanic.
Table Four:
Bivariate Analysis
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a new treatment to aid
traumatized youth. During the treatment, information was gathered on how traumatic life events
impact behavioral outbursts. Three research questions were asked in this study. The research
question as well as the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis are listed below. In all
reporting, a .05 alpha or rejection level is used.
Research Question/Statistical Test
Example of
Dependent
Independent
Variable (level
Variable (level of
of
5
measurement)
measurement)
Number of trauma
Number of
(ratio level)
serious
Pearson r (correlation)
Question One: Did the number of trauma
experiences had by the children have an effect on the
number of serious behavioral incidents the children
exhibited?
Null Hypothesis: The number of trauma
behavioral
incidents (ratio
level)
exhibited.
Alternative Hypothesis: The number of trauma
experiences had by the children had an effect on the
number of serious behavioral incidents the children
exhibited.
Chi-Square
Question Two: Did the assigned treatment group
have an effect on the earned off campus privileges?
Null Hypothesis: The assigned treatment group had
Assignment of
Earned off
treatment group
campus
(nominal level)
privileges
(nominal)
T-Test
Question Three: Did gender have an effect on the
number of serious behavioral incidents exhibited by
the children?
Null Hypothesis: Gender had no effect on the
Gender (nominal
The number of
level)
serious
behavioral
the children.
incidents (ratio
level)
Defining Results:
To analyze question one, determining whether previous traumatic events impacted
behavioral incidences within clients, the Pearson correlation statistic was calculated r(.975,
r2=.95, p<.05) According to Cohens guidelines there is a strong correlation between these two
groups. This presents a strong suggestion that the Alternative hypothesis is correct. The number
of traumas experienced within the previous life of a participant impacts the behaviors displayed.
Table five displays this data.
Table Five:
Correlations
Serious
Number of Traumas
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
Number of
Behavioral
Traumas
Incidents
1
.975**
.000
N
Serious Behavioral Incidents Pearson Correlation
50
50
**
.975
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
50
50
Analyzing question two, whether group assignment impacted earning privileges, required
using Chi-Square because the expected frequency count in the chart is greater than 10 and both
fields needed can only be answered with yes or no. The results indicate that there is a low
chance of sampling error having significant impact on the results. It also reports that there is a
significant relationship between group assignment and privileges earned. (x2=3.920, df=1,
p<.05)
Table Six:
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
Likelihood Ratio
df
(2-sided)
3.920a
.048
2.880
.090
3.973
.046
sided)
.089
3.842
.044
.050
50
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
The final question relates to whether gender impacted the number of serious behavioral incidents
a participant experienced. For this the T-Test was used. Because of the small sampling group the
standard deviation is elevated. To gain a more accurate picture a larger sampling group is
needed. Table eight shows that the mean difference is -.12000. This difference is not large
enough to reject the null hypothesis that gender had an effect on the number of serious
behavioral incidents exhibited by the children. Therefore a hypothesis can be made that gender
impacts behaviors. (p=.939)
Table Seven:
Group Statistics
Gender
Mean
Std. Deviation
25
5.4400
3.96947
.79389
25
5.5600
6.75204
1.35041
Table 8:
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test
for Equality of
Variances
Mean
Sig. (2- Differen
F
Serious
Equal variances
Behavioral
assumed
Incidents
Equal variances
not assumed
3.559
Sig.
.065
-.077
df
tailed)
ce
Std.
95% Confidence
Error
Interval of the
Differen
Difference
ce
Lower
Upper
48
.939
-.12000 1.56648
-3.26962 3.02962
-.077 38.819
.939
-.12000 1.56648
-3.28898 3.04898
9
Implications
The results of this study show that the experiences that a client has in their lives impacts
the choices they will make in the future. It also reveals that the group assignment, determining
what type of treatment is received, impacted how many privileges a client earned. In addition to
this it was also found that different genders behave in different ways. All of these findings are
important to researchers, program developers and other professionals.
With the knowledge that traumatic events impact future decisions, early intervention is
important to help lessen the impact on clients and prevent further trauma. Another important
result is that new treatment options had a positive impact on clients ability to earn privileges.
This finding should encourage program developers to continue working to find new ways to
reach out to traumatized individuals. It is also important for professionals to take note of the
difference in genders. This knowledge allows workers to consider developing unique
programing for male and female clients.
In order to develop the most effective interventions and gain the most understanding on
this people group there is a plethora of research that could be conducted. One additional area to
look at would be determining the age of a client at the time of the first trauma and seeing the
relationship of this to the number of serious behavioral incidences, as well as to their ability to
earn privileges. This could show if there is a difference in outcomes for different ages when they
experience trauma.