0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
150 Ansichten1 Seite
The group functioned exceptionally well. All members listened to, shared with and supported the efforts of others. Some members of the group were often off task and / or were overtly disrespectful to others in the group. Group researched the subject and integrated 7 or more characteristics requested from their research instructions into their presentations.
The group functioned exceptionally well. All members listened to, shared with and supported the efforts of others. Some members of the group were often off task and / or were overtly disrespectful to others in the group. Group researched the subject and integrated 7 or more characteristics requested from their research instructions into their presentations.
The group functioned exceptionally well. All members listened to, shared with and supported the efforts of others. Some members of the group were often off task and / or were overtly disrespectful to others in the group. Group researched the subject and integrated 7 or more characteristics requested from their research instructions into their presentations.
Pughs Multimedia Project : Biome Expedition Web Quest Rubric
CATEGORY
points
3 points
2 points
1 points
Mechanics
No misspellings or grammatical errors.
Three or fewer misspellings
and/or mechanical errors.
Four misspellings and/or
grammatical errors.
More than 4 errors in spelling or
grammar.
Group Work
The group functioned
exceptionally well. All members listened to, shared with and supported the efforts of others. The group (all members) was almost always on task! Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.
The group functioned
pretty well. Most members listened to, shared with and supported the efforts of others. The group (all members) was almost always on task! Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.
The group functioned fairly
well but was dominated by one or two members. The group (all members) was almost always on task
Some members of the group
were often off task and/or were overtly disrespectful to others in the group and/or were typically disregarded by other group members.
Content is logically organized for
the most part.
There was no clear or logical
organizational structure, just lots of facts
Makes use of font, color,
graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. Group researched the subject and integrated 3 characteristics requested from their research instructions into their presentations.
Use of font, color, graphics, effects
etc. but these often distract from the presentation content.
Almost all facts are reported
accurately (3 of 5).
Little to no facts are reported
accurately OR no facts were reported. Graphics are not related to the material being presented.
Organization
Attractiveness
Makes excellent use of font, color,
graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
Research
Group researched the subject
and integrated 7 or more characteristics requested from their research instructions into their presentations.
Accuracy of Facts
All supportive facts are reported
accurately (5 of 5)
Graphical Representation
Graphics include some original
material and are clearly related to the material being presented.
Point of View Purpose
Establishes a purpose at the
beginning and maintains that focus throughout! Cohesive presentation.
Group researched the
subject and integrated 5 characteristics requested from their research instructions into their presentations. Almost all facts are reported accurately (4 of 5). Graphics are clearly related to the material being presented, but none are original. Establishes a purpose at the beginning, but occasionally wanders from that focus.
Graphics include some original
material but are only somewhat related to the material being presented. The purpose is somewhat clear but many aspects of the presentation seem only slightly related.
Either no research was done
or it was not clear that the group used it in the presentation.