Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Research and
selection of Issue
widely researched,
interest in chosen area,
identification of
appropriate issue.
5 marks
Formulation of
solution
appropriate/relevant to
identified issue,
creative/innovative,
sustainable, feasible.
10 marks
Time management
taking responsibility,
managing time
effectively, timely
completion of phases.
10 marks
Incorporation of
feedback ability to
utilise teacher and peer
feedback to increase
quality/effectiveness of
project.
10 marks
Strongly
meets/exceeds
requirements
Exceptional ability to
make an informed
selection of an
appropriate sustainability
issue through extensive
research.
Soundly meets
requirements
Meets requirements
Meets limited
requirements
Below requirements
5 marks
Demonstrates an
excellent ability to
formulate an insightful,
creative, feasible,
sustainable solution,
directly relevant to the
identified issue.
9-10 marks
Exceptional use of time
management skills,
completing all tasks to a
high level within allocated
time frames. Consistently
takes responsibility for
own learning.
4 marks
Demonstrates a sound
ability to formulate a
creative, sustainable
solution that directly
relates to the identified
issue.
3 marks
Demonstrates an
adequate ability to
formulate a creative,
sustainable solution that
relates to the identified
issue.
1-2 marks
Demonstrates a limited
ability to formulate a
sustainable solution that
relates to an identified
issue.
0 marks
Does not meet the minimum
performance criteria. Insufficient
evidence of appropriate solution to
identified problem.
7-8 marks
Sound use of time
management skills,
completing all tasks
within allocated time
frames. Frequently takes
responsibility for own
learning.
2-3 marks
Minimal use of time
management skills,
demonstrating a limited
ability to complete tasks
within allocated time
frames. Minimal displays
of taking responsibility for
own learning.
0 - 1 mark
Does not meet the minimum
performance criteria. Failed to
demonstrate satisfactory time
management skills to complete
set tasks.
9-10 marks
Excellent ability to
comprehend and
incorporate both teacher
and peer feedback to
inform future stages of
planning. Effectively used
feedback to increase the
quality of the project.
9-10 marks
Exceptional participation
in all aspects of the task,
demonstrating a high
level of engagement
7-8 marks
Sound ability to
comprehend and
incorporate both teacher
and peer feedback to
inform future stages of
planning. Used feedback
to increase the quality of
the project.
7-8 marks
Sound participation in all
aspects of the task,
demonstrating an
appropriate level of
4-6 marks
Adequate use of time
management skills,
demonstrating the ability
to complete tasks within
allocated time frames.
Satisfactory evidence of
ability to take
responsibility for own
learning.
4-6 marks
Adequate ability to use
both teacher and peer
feedback to inform future
stages of planning.
Sufficiently used feedback
to increase the quality of
the project.
2-3 marks
Limited ability to use
teacher or peer feedback
to inform future stages of
planning. rarely used
feedback to increase the
quality of the project.
0 - 1 mark
Does not meet the minimum
performance criteria. Fails to
respond to peer or teacher
feedback to increase the quality
and/or effectiveness of the project.
4-6 marks
Adequate participation in
most aspects of the task,
demonstrating a
satisfactory level of
2-3 marks
Limited participation
throughout aspects of the
task, demonstrating a low
level of engagement.
0 - 1 mark
Does not meet the minimum
performance criteria. Failed to
engage with the task to a
satisfactory level. Does not meet
stages.
5 marks
5 marks
Total mark:
/40
engagement throughout
all stages.
4 marks
engagement throughout
stages.
3 marks
0 marks