Happiness, Tranquillity,
and Philosophy
CHARLES L. GRISWOLD, JR.
‘The apne of mand elas ofa ther rato
setae, srs to ive been the egal purpose tn
teal by the Astor of ute when be brow hs
Aa Sth
Fw quisnoxsrossss great an extent urgency and ger
philosophical interest as “wns haplne? I apes the
tints end of ours, Anta rue cera an
{nae en Ao witout hapless seems seacely worth he hari
Te pus of tpi Jleront Lockwn phn, neat
thoroughly woven al ont poets aul apes
Tete wna are seed ee ars The
fi that paosopers have had ltl te ty aout tn pte
af ts enomous importance to hme fe One woul have hgh
sre a aman tn ne
‘dovoed oi Anstole and some of kis telense desconans
‘couse, writ onthe sj Bt they re th exceptions hat pone
these, There exist sme limited tretinets by major Catan
seca phllsopers: oe this ofthe rears by Bots a The
Consolation of Philowophy sn by Thomas inte Summa Thole
‘Dut no major mdi eats deed othe subjet has comet
tous. Devas, Spinoza, Lack, Leibl Bersley, Vola, Hote.
ton, Hume, Burk, and Smith ofler x romar but onc aga 90
‘tended teatment Diderot rumints ba the sje sins Ro
fre du prmeeursoltaire Rosen offers us something mores
mediation tan an argue Kast has relly ey sont
the nator of happiness ren Hough haps: plays ao len
the architecton ofits. For Hegel. ton, he tp a
erative interes! Huser, Heslegger and Sarre have rete: H
Bbry “Tranquility, Deste, Blessedness
to says Nietzsche's remarks are scatered; surprisingly there are
‘no long treatments in Emerson, Thoreau, James, or Dewey. Among
the classical wilitartans, only Sidgwick makes extensive remarks, but
‘eve scarcely amount toa comprehensive treatment ofthe subject?
‘Wehave Bertrand Russells essay a ew scattered remarks by Witgen-
sci, nothing by Whitehead of note. Thoze exist contemporary dis-
‘Gaiions and no doubt there are other pieces one might mentin.®
‘My point is that by and large the major philosophers in the Western
tradition have not pad Ue topic a great deal of attention”
“Thislends me ta scond bert about this sbjet Nong
losophers seem generally to assume that there isan answer to the
‘question “what is happiness?” Some clan to have found it and (per
Tap fora foe} wil tell you howto do the same, Atte sme ime, there
soem tobe general agreement that happiness isa hard thing ton”
‘hati, to define ond to attain, It strange situation; happinessis so
tmich «part of us asto be unable to remain unknown: yet we cannot
find it
‘A third observation f that “happiness” is wsed in many ways. Tt
can be spoken of as contentment, or tranguilty, or blessedness, oF
festa oF as ¢ tnood, of as well-being, to name a few. One could
Speak of inthe long-term or inthe short-term sense. We aze not
‘divas clear aboot which senge we have in ind when we talk cas
fly about our being “happy.” Our Vocabulary of happiness is not a
failsafe guide tothe meaning of the term,
Tn lentfying a sense of what happiness can mean, however, one
must appeal to some intuition oF opinion, and ineitably others wil
tppeal to ofr iatuitions and opiatons’ We must, a Aristotle say,
Start vith what own tous in order to reach what s knowable in
fell Nleomacheun Ethie 1.4.100552-7). But pants of what is known
tous cont with other pats
‘This problem is implicit in prephilosophie ordinary ituitions
People often assume thal happiess bas a “youl know it when you
‘see W” quality Yet people also recognize that they frequently soe mis.
{alenls they will say" thought he was so happy! I've Imown him for
years! [can't believe he committed suicide!” Or agin, people often
[vocite the accutnlation of wealth wit happiness, and pechaps are
‘motivated to accumulate wealth precisely because they think i will,
‘ning them great happiness. Yet moraists heve abvays told us, and ex-
perience seetns ta confirm, that neither the pursuit of wealth nor
lappiness, Tranquility, and Pilowophy Fo
sucess in hat puss ring happiness! So wets recognize that
she es wen pip ions ‘ot hap
ines. Ise no way of avoling this old methodologal problem,
ings Soe rt the pon ato yen ea
‘more chan parochial concsons?
‘In approaching the nov of happiness, Ihave one partialar
sense of the term nnd, armel thet in hich we ean speak ofa
eon a generally “hap” as hay ve the ng ter Tan ong
ange sense of happiness” you could sy you are apy even tough
atthe moment of yng it jou ight 0k feel apy We often fel
apps tts or at oj fr exp, Ten be happy whee e-
cele tenure Bt is diferent fom the happiness that applies toa
Ife asa whole and which dhs arses Fm a certain may of eading a
We. Tn choosing to reflect on happiness inthis more comprehensive
sete 1am allow Arsote’s ea, You rec his remark that “one
Swallow doesnot make a spring nor does one sunny dy, slay one
diy ore stort time doesnot rake a man blessed (makarion) and
Ippy(eudanon)"° Kant oo, for alot bis diferences th Arte,
spss ohne” nhs ogrnge nse te aor
ths mean te dings bapinese fom jo ext «romantic
transcending, andthe ke Happnes, nto see {arn diese
ingit, not mood. These may perhaps be eeredtolegitmatey by
our word “happiness.” but 1am interested in casing this oer
Sense af the term, because tis precisely this sense which people sen
teow to ave i mind when engaged in the part of happiness.
"Happiness both subjective and objective ques ts both
an exportece aud a notion, and nlther of these two dimensions
Should be ignored. Calling sach and each the eontons of happiness
istobaveaviw of hs ater han ht experience of which hve ee
the conditions. At the sme tie, frst person reports of one expert
cececan be stn. Ae elec oma ony ye
oF snot happy, Tse that have odgimentsn mind about ml
the world whats sesh now and ver the long teem, whats worth
pursuing and avoiding and so oth, Tcl be mistaken in astssng
ny of those things
1 shall argue thatthe experlene of happiness i best und
stood, ant, in terms of rangi At these te, T shall
soges that we cannot be happy unless rightly anesthe cond
tins of our happnes. sal attempt to elucidate what happiness16 “Tranquility, Desire, Blessedness
ty etogting rom vt shall al tent” nd shal
plore further the connection betwoen happiness and assessment or
cae to One ncers it nfo tagpns err
Sten este w anand esp bee
HORRY BS prc inosine spy Te
eter tonal xn nya ete en By
eects ee tcc nde paucn kes
Seay nee lacy ud ape legate ot
cranes det go of thr emule peromeae bow
cher cmp ba
Witbier nat
stoma ins th ster cx ore) ie
ae cen wth ply enero
wer tetet cen thane ul be Sacto an
Bete eicurcpeon ecranaat
SESE CTE wae muy er nes at «come
rene esta of it moe oer tl
se vette ties Sele eanot ee le
aetna weanon ine re fy gh ete
Panta wed ang, he seed re nn
See ape Eno mach pein a the ec
seach ou te ela do exe
| HAPPINESS AND TRANQUILLITY
apis oss in banquiy denyment. Wout
{eo Ge case oa ejoments nd we here
Sosa tamu three ay ng wc nt
bie
See Na st"
Happiness is best characterized in terns of tranquility. So
understood it captures the connection between happiness and being
lt rest. Happiness i more like rest than motion, into senses. Fis,
in the sense of lacking significant discord; itis peaceful, at a deep
level. Second, itis more like coming to a stop rather than like @
process of moving towards a goal. Happiness resembles an end stat,
‘Pcompletion ot fulilment, rather than a condition of lacking and
“vercoming of lack:" For thie rea, happiness and conteatment
Happiness, Tranquility, and Philosophy ¥
com alike, and later I wil sy more about the difference between th
two. When one says “I ave lived happily” or “Lam deeply happy
‘one mens, anon other things, that ote does not experience sga
‘ant internal discord, and that fundamentally one oceupies spit
plice from which one doesnot desire to move. One isnot, ata de
Tevel, azxious; basicaly, one is properly oriented, and one’ funda
‘mental stance tovatds the world i complete, at rest. Lam sketching
‘5a starting pont, this sort of wew ofthe experience of happiness.
“Tranguility” usally tanslates the Greek term atari, a tex
thats the natural competitor to eudaimonia, which isthe one tha
Plato and Aristotle use. The latter is normally translated, with trop
tio, as “happinoss,” and less often as “blessednes"s tora I al
‘ict to translate, and “tranquility” is somothing of an approxi
‘Gon, "Impertrbabiity” also captures something of ts sense
‘The word atarazla doesnot cur in Pato and Aristotle tis
bbe found i important passages in Sextus Epirus, Epictotu
‘Marcus Aurelius, and Epicurus, among others The alpha prvatve
not of course, captured by “tranquility,” and this is one way in whi
‘he trnlation in smperfect In ts verbal form, with or without thy
alpha prvative, the word goes back to Homer Thee ts waed
Ihomes, among othe things a horse src by an arow “Aisturbed
(exdpage) the chariot and other horses (Iliad 8.86, “Tarxipps
{CDisturber of Hore” spoked rae courses. na numberof water
the ves can refer to mental or physical penonal disturbance, or
‘the “dsturbanee” ofa pls, thai, the upsetting of evi discord
‘ce ring up trouble agitating, cstracing, east sso atarax
fn the community, One can “deur” «thing, a when one sts up
ody of water: « mudslinger or muckeraker can “strb® an ind
‘ida or community one can “star” inthe sense of med, psc
ln army or nny thi sown ito confusion Ss ths described b
‘Thocyddes. At 496-3 Thucydides wes the verb in desenbing a tt
in which Athenians mistakenly ill one another as a rau ofthe
sal confusion and disorientation,
Tn general, then, peacefulness and calmness (hol) are aki
ta staraia. Understood as ataravia, happiness ia state of mind,
beter «stato of soul In speaking a eudaimonta, Epcot exit
equate i with otra wit freedom an asenoe of passions op
ia) Tes rer ie a tat of peels, being in conto, ae
Iharony calm, ress opposed toa state of war, desing that whi1s ‘Tranquility, Desire, Blessedness
‘seat of oe conta to can, ater cord, bane, tn,
Portutbaton, Bur donot wat fo corse is Sts sein or
{roy ots eeaoe servi about apps as tara ate
tobe ound inthe Sepis and Eplorene, but lo bneaae there
tre poems with Let meses te decom oy aroment
Beas of ser pass tom ebhes
vrata Hobbes Ethan we acs “Cntinal cin
cbtanng hse thing which aan Soon tn ote ese at
SStosmcominsal poser tba en cll FELICITY {mes
the Fly of ths Me For threo uch hing pepe Tran
anuliy of mind, whe we Ine here, Because Tae ells but
Mtn, and can never bo witht Desi, nor without Fee, no
‘noe than wt Semse* Prem the ok Hobbes bes
the ame theme, Mer decaring hat here eno auch ting a 8
‘Summ Bont, contay to the “books ofthe old Moral Pbo-
phere he state ayia conta progres of he dese, fo
Enc ebjet to enother; te stig of he fer, ig lt he
Sry othe tn And therfore the ua atom ant.
tons ofall men, end not only othe procting, but oto the
turing ofa contented Met pt fore gener natin of
tanking, perpetual and rexdot dex of Power alter powes, tat
South ene Death Lie fy inser words, contnuly
trtion bec cance ven by dese, anne far td
Eames the earcf vn det Homan ie anata
Getarhane deg or reper Frm the ante or maton
Fobles expan swe nage finan phenomena, fom compel
tote conten fo an to cry sequence
ii were len aso dao hen we suey would
cali hapyy: we weld not post what Hebhes cle perpetall
Trnqullyo nod Hobbes seems ht n asaclatng contentment
wih ie moverent rom oe sift othe net sce itn
Sealy unabl vn though sel aby, The pest coat
Hebe ptr then, Beveen Tey ort we might aig
cures om his own word, betel repeated contenant
Tanqlly ovr ne Fely einer intervenes vith ansety,
hota acy ot We on gt hat oe eth of te
‘rant for empl, lack even fy, Nenopbons Bl proves &
‘ondefl does to tht feet and lev undrtand why the
von of the “pp oan oxen
Happiness, Tranquility and Philosophy. 19
Hobbes parallel distinctions between felicity and tranquility,
‘motion and rest, desiring and completion, seom basically right. But
‘We need not accep the view tha happiness has been completely de-
‘serbed in this manner, or that tis impossible in this fe
‘On this iow, the enemy of rangi is ansiety.Thave in mind
rot so much anxiety about ths or that event, but rather & general
naety about things being out of iter not stable, not holding, poten-
‘sally dissolving” When Hobbes tall about the fer people hav that
‘thoir competitors might gain enough power to threaten them, he is
Aetting atthe latter, thong he remains within the sphere of the po-
Tinea That nagging doube, or even the quiet dread of. of what?
Perhaps itis somothin like dread thatthe foundations on which we
bull our fe are not yet finished, or may crumble, or never were well
laid Prtaps (ve thnk silently to ourselves) my ile as been a waste,
‘amounted to nothing. What havo I become? What will become of
‘ne? Was tis a praiseworthy life? Even worse, the soul may whis-
| pertoitelf "I don't know, things are eo dificult to discam cleaty, 1
Seem surrounded by grayness and beyond that by darkness, every-
thing is so... indefinite, formless.” Whea questions such es these
feat away your soul, ansety or topaz has won out over happiness
(cf. Adaan Smith, TMS 62:32, p. 235)
-Atarasia captures what one might ell the affective, subjective