Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2


North American University

Education Department
M.Ed. in Educational Leadership and M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction
EDUC 5324
Name: Serkan Demirel_____________

Date: 07/05/2015___________

Cite the reviewed article in APA format:

Waxman, H., Boriack, A., Yuan-Hsuan, L., & MacNeil, A. (2013). Principals' Perceptions of the
Importance of Technology in Schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(3), 187-196.
Research Questions (if research questions are not specifically mentioned, what is
the theoretical background or overarching theme):
Technology is often viewed as a strategy that will facilitate students academic achievement,
however; is technology integrated in schools, especially into the teaching and learning process?
Purpose of the research:
The purpose of this research is to examine the principals perceptions of the importance of
technology and how years of experience and gender effect the perceptions of technology.
What is the methodology for the research or approach used to understand the
issue? Provide information regarding the following:


A convenience sample that is consisted of 126 male and 184 female principals from a large
metropolitan area in the southwest region of the United was present.
A range of years of experience was present with 104 participants having 0-3 years of
experience, 82 participants having 4-7 years, 55 participants having 8-11 years, 32
participants having 12-15 years, and 31 participants having greater than 15 years of

The interview included both qualitative and quantitative questions such as Has
technology had an impact in your school?" and "If so, in what specific ways
has it made a difference?

Data Collection Methods/Data Source:

The questionnaire was administered by graduate students in the Educational Leadership program
at a major, urban doctoral-granting university located in the south central region of the U.S.
As part of the principals certification course requirements, students were trained on how to
administer the instrument and required to interview a specific number of current public school

Data Analysis:
Analysis of the interview data began with a process of data reduction. The participants responses
were read several times to become familiar with the data. The data was then coded into
meaningful categories. Once the categories were established, another researcher independently
coded a 10% sample of responses to determine the consistency of the coding. The inter-coder
reliability results revealed a high level of agreement.
Findings or Results (or main points of the article):
The principals responses for the major functions of technology were grouped into six categories.

Conclusions/Implications (for your profession):
The present study indicates that principals perceptions of the major functions of technology in
their schools are varied by sex and years of experience. This may influence the leadership that
principals provide when implementing technology in their schools and needs to be studied further
in order to better understand the implications for technology use in schools. Principal preparation
programs may want to consider addressing technology leadership so that school leaders are better
prepared to effectively implement technology in their schools.
Students Reflections (changes to your understanding; implications for your
The vast body of research indicating that principals are not adequately prepared for leadership in
a technology-rich environment. Although there is evidence that principals have a positive view of
technology and are using technology themselves, principals must leverage resources beyond
formal leadership preparation to develop technology leadership skills. Since technology has
replaced workers who perform routine work, while it complements workers with higher-level
skills and empowers them to be more productive and creative, schools have to adapt themselves
to the changing world with the technology leadership of the principals.