Bradburn et al v. North Central Regional Library District Doc.

48

The Honorable Edward F. Shea

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SPOKANE

SARAH BRADBURN, PEARL )

CHERRNGTON, CHARLES )
HEINLEN, and THE SECOND ) NO. CV-06-327-EFS
AMENDMENT FOUNATION, )
) DEFENDANT NORTH CENTRAL
Plaintiffs, ) REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT'S
) MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION
Y. ) TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR
) SUMARY JUDGMENT
NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL )
LIBRARY DISTRICT, )
)
Defendant. )
)

DEFENDANT NORTH CENTRAL

REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT'S
MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT - 1 I,aw Offces

CY-06-327-EFS
KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL
#659258 v 1/42703-001 A Professional Service Corpolalion
1201 Tbird Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, WasbiDg10n 98101-3028
Telephone (206) 223-1313, Facsimile (206) 682-7100

Dockets.Justia.com
 1 I. INTRODUCTION
2
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment ("Plaintiffs' Motion;" Ct. Rec. 40)
3

4 presents a sweeping mosaic of constitutional law that is not entirely germane and which

5 is predicated on exaggerations of fact. Plaintiffs Motion should be denied and, for the
6
reasons discussed in Defendant North Central Regional Library District's Motion for
7

8 Summary Judgment ("NCRL's Motion;" Ct. Rec. 28), judgment should be entered in
9
favor of NCRL. Alternatively, NCRL asks this Court to certify to the Washington
10
1 1
Supreme Court the issues raised by Plaintiffs which implicate Art. I, § 5 of the
12
Washington State Constitution. (Ct. Rec. 37)
13

14
NCRL responds to Plaintiffs' contentions In approximately the same order
15 Plaintiffs' present them. 1

16
II. SUMMARY OF FACTS
17
18 A. NCRL's Filter is not overly restrictive.
19 Plaintiffs claim that "the FortiGuard filter allows NCRL to block individual web
20
sites based on any criteria or no criteria at all according to the preferences of library
21
22 administrators." (Ct. Rec. 40, pg. 3). In fact, NCRL strives to restrict internet access
23
24 1 The form of
Plaintiffs' Motion contravenes LR 7.1(f) and 10.1(a)(2).
25
26 DEFENDANT NORTH CENTRAL
27 REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT'S
MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO
28 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMARY
JUDGMENT - 2 Law Offces

CY-06-327-EFS KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL

#659258 v i /42703-00 I A Profe,'isional Service Corporation
12111 Third A\'cnuc. Suile 29011, Scanle, Washin~lon 98111-31128
Tclciihiinc (2116) 223-1313. Facsimile (206) 682-7IHII