Samuel Adams

ETEC 424
ePortfolio Peer Review for Avry Smith
EPortfolio Rubric
Overall nicely done! A few items missing or need changed related to the rubric and
grading sheet.

Criteria

Exemplary - 4

Proficient - 3

Limited - 2

Unsatisfactory 1

All artifacts are

accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
Artifacts are
accompanied by explains what the
item is, why it
an introduction
was created, and
that clearly
explains what the why its
item is, why it was important.
created, and why
its important.

Most of the
artifacts are
accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
explains what the
item is, why it
was created, and
why its
important.

Some of the
artifacts are
accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
explains what the
item is, why it
was created, and
why its
important.

No artifacts are
accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
explains what the
item is, why it
was created, and
why its
important.

Selection of
Artifacts
Selects artifacts
that support the
purpose of the
eportfolio and the
skills/abilities
demonstrated in
each section.

Most artifacts and

work samples are
related to the
purpose of the
eportfolio. The
eportfolio
includes a variety
of artifacts.

Some of the
artifacts and work
samples are
related to the
purpose of the
eportfolio. The
eportfolio
includes some
variety of
artifacts.

The artifacts and

work samples do
not relate to the
purpose of the
eportfolio. The
eportfolio does
not include a
variety of
artifacts.

Introduction of
Artifacts

Points

3
Missing an
introduction
on
discussion
board page

3
All artifacts and
work samples are
clearly and
directly related to
the purpose of the
eportfolio. The
eportfolio
includes a wide
variety of
artifacts.

The
assignments
are to be
embedded
not a
download

3
Reflection on
Learning
Reflections on
each page/section
describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishments)

All reflections
clearly describe
the learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishments)
that occurred from
producing the
artifacts.

Most of the
reflections
describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishments)
that occurred from
producing the

A few of the
reflections
describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishments)
that occurred from
producing the

The reflections do
not describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishments)
that occurred from
producing the

Unable to
access the
blog, link
does not
work

that occurred from

producing the
artifacts.

artifacts.

artifacts.

artifacts.

Connection to
All reflections
Future Learning illustrate the
ability to
effectively
Reflections
critique work, and
illustrate the
include goals for
ability to
continued learning
effectively
critique the work (long and short
and identify areas term).
for continued
learning.

Most of the
reflections
illustrate the
ability to
effectively
critique work, and
include goals for
continued learning
(long and short
term).

A few reflections
illustrate the
ability to
effectively
critique work, and
include goals for
continued learning
(long and short
term).

The reflections do
not illustrate the
ability to
effectively
critique work or
include goals for
continued learning
(long and short
term).

Navigation and
Readability
The organization
of the eportfolio
and how to
navigate to
various
sections/pages is
clearly indicated.

The navigation
links generally
function well, but
it is not always
clear how to
locate an artifact
or move to related
pages or different
section.

Page layout
(including
headings, font size
and color,
whitespace, and
other text
formatting make
the eportfolio and
artifacts easy to
read.
Writing is clear
and free of
grammatical,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

The various parts

of the portfolio
are labeled,
clearly organized
and allow the
reader to easily
locate an artifact
and move to
related pages or a
different section.
Color,
background, font
styles (italic, bold,
underline) and
type size for
headings, subheadings and text
are used
consistently and
enhance the
readability
throughout the
eportfolio.
Horizontal and
vertical white
space alignment is
used appropriately
to organize
content.

The navigation
links are
somewhat
confusing, and it
is often unclear
how to locate an
artifact or move to
related pages or a
different section.
Some of the
external links do
Color,
background, font not connect to the
appropriate
styles, and type
size for headings, website or file.
sub-headings and
text are generally The eportfolio is
used consistently often difficult to
throughout the
read due to
eportfolio.
inappropriate use
Horizontal and
of fonts and type
vertical white
size for headings,
space alignment is sub-headings and
generally used
text or
appropriately to
inconsistent use of
organize content. font styles (italic,
bold, underline).
Color of
The writing is
background, fonts,
largely free of
and links
grammatical,
decreases the
spelling or
readability of the
punctuation

The navigation
links are
confusing, and it
is difficult to
locate artifacts
and move to
related pages or a
different section.
Many of the
external links do
not connect to the
appropriate
website or file.
The eportfolio is
difficult to read
due to
inappropriate use
of fonts, type size
for headings, subheadings and text
and font styles
(italic, bold,
underline). Color
of background,
fonts, and links
decreases the
readability of the
text, is distracting
and used
inconsistently

The writing is
clear and free of
grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation
errors.

errors.

text and used

inconsistently in
some places
throughout the
eportfolio.
Horizontal and
vertical white
space alignment is
sometimes used
inappropriately to
organize content.

throughout the
eportfolio.
Horizontal and
vertical white
space alignment is
used
inappropriately,
and the content
appears
disorganized and
cluttered.

The writing
includes include
some
grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation errors
that distract the
reader.

Numerous
grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation errors
hinder effective
communication
and distract the
reader.