Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • The Status of Ethical Judgment in PI

    Hochgeladen von

    danielschwartz88
    4 Ansichten8 Seiten
    by Hodges

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    by Hodges

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    4 Ansichten8 Seiten

    The Status of Ethical Judgment in PI

    Hochgeladen von

    danielschwartz88
    by Hodges

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 8
    ‘2 Sympon on he pilot of, Bley bl ding the 1994 Jit ‘Sesion of te Min Auch Aaelun Soy fa dele fms nero Bay Sey A wl nish ai ons, ‘Sse wl partly ome, Boe Sse, Seve oc od schol te on ll pe of Bey’ hog a etn mode hsp, Aston who obs pepe fr hota owe se ner Mancoee Coleg, Mand Rend, Oxted OX! 37D, United inion ie ie 8p 198 The Status of Ethical Judgments in the Philosophical Investigations “Michael Hodges, Vandel University ‘There is in or at lest in and around Wingestein’ ler pilosophy 4 seme of what the good ife might be or atleast what philosophy ‘has to contribute to being lived. However, that topic i never engl dscused, There are hints in Cala ud Vale and there fe way of teading the Ieeigaton in light ofthe etic specs of {he Trae which ae highly suggeive” My ov view i ha in order filly to undestand Wiegenstein’s views here we must com= bine an undersanding of what he has wo say abou plsophy with ogaphical information, parca the advice that he gave to his stacens. In te final analy, however, the arempt to constuct Postive view wil avays involve specaltion and will ot rer in 3 definitive iterpretion, I ceraily does no follow tat such spec thon i noe Bull if only because i see the Dmetigeon in 3 vere of new lights* However, ete, Iwill purve a diferent couse by examining the sams of eis judgments in ight of Wirgenstein's more general reflections on meaning and language found in the later philosophy I believe tae while Wicgenstei pat to rat cerain eadvonal problems that have seemed t plague oUt cal thinking, be does not flow out some ofthe more radia implications of his own thinking ‘A the very centre of Wingencin' ter work is # section of the posblty of what lave ealed temcendence! We cannot achieve what was the wkimate goal ofthe Traatus~ a view of the ‘Wodd and wid ic ourselves nd our practices aa imited whole — at fhe tonay of Gee OF emine, the ltr Wingertin dace ‘mecly deny this posiblity since such a simple denial would seem to invoke wha ic denies. Rather his writing diplaces transcendence 4 loi hi aaa win hook Es owt Ply (eaten FS Bed Aaa P"See gp dong tis wi coed, Slap Rand dae’ Ps Teg Unie Pre 1290 100 Phipps in vay of ways chroughout the Phish! Ineigetins. Quite often he does ths merely by cling atenson to the radical gap benween the plulsopher’ quetion formulated in the light of the pasibity of tanscendence andthe character of our acl practices. ‘Nothing tke the philoopher's concere are at sake in coming tO tems with our practices, The philosophers ‘wick’ i to misdirect, four atenion and wo make i appear that hiker concer i some ‘how conrnuoos with our everyday goings on.* Bu a Wingenstein pins out inthe very secxon of the Inveiatn wih ear (0 {he philosophers notion of meaning, ‘No sich thing was in quet= son her’ (Pl 1) Trcannoc and will not here reheane the vaieny of ways in which ‘Wingenstem dplaces the hold ofthe pictre of tarscendence ia the Phsophial Testis. Instead 1 wil invesigate what the Implications of that dplacement ae for how we think about the ial ‘These are ovo key pages tha deere special azention. One it om the PhibephialImesigatons and the ote i om Cale nd Value, A&P, 241 and 242 Wiegensein my, "So you ae sying hat human agreement decides whats ve and swt ee wat Boma bangs ay ht ura be edhe seein the ngage they we That nt aemen in ‘pinion atin mo langage io be 3 ean of communication there must be sqeemr oot only in aedeons bor uy (ere hs toy SSID jegnena Tha vento bah lope bt doe nor 3 rie one thing to. Scie rol of meaeemene, and Moker t cba unf ste souks of menusenest Bat whit we {mesg spy Seemioed by 1 era conan in Sou ofmentrene ” Hire Wingestein appear o be rejecting a rude form of reais ‘becrue fe flo ake account of two very dierent forms of gree- ‘ment ~ aieement in opinions and agreement inform of ie, But ‘hati the diference he ban ind? Mie Hoes oy “The second parsgaph gives us che answer. There we ae given 3

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen