Name(last, Firs): |. Bppeblfirg PE 3813 Mid-term Exam(70minutes) Feb 23, 2006 Points to remember: 1) Be neat 2) Box your answers \ 3) Use color pencils on graphs 4) Sign the last page 1. a) List various factors that influence log quality. ) How is shale volume estimated using SP log? (8 points) (A). Steess in Rarmation * Pore geometry - mud type- (wake ~ based ) + Solinity + Dol - u etogiee (Tha (5Plygand Chant - LP) Seng Wh ae > BaSem de 25dem m= 60s Stone eased fy lab has length ~ 5.00 om, diameter ~ k 0gm. Bar 0.06 Pab= Ilghe 7a. After saturating the plug with a brine of resistivity 0.06 ohm.m and density of "Gr. 1.1 gm/ce the weight of the plug is measured as 63.5 gm. Calculate the Pas effective porosity of the sample. b. By actual measurement the end-to-end resistance for the plugis foundtobe = nly 96 ohms. Calculate Ro and formation factor values of the plug. : ©. Some of the brine is removed from the core plug by drying and the new > weight of the plug is found to be 62.8 gm. Calculate the water saturation. - 4. What would be the resistivity of this partially saturated plug? (16 points) A OS fats W= 2250686 2A babys) coche * ae ree aac © Lees A v : a 095067 (8) T= fl ohas ®=r, (A) = gn (Oe? 7 Baws — [@> ad pL ~/ S ee _ Os: 50% 2 an XxSeparator example Gas: P= 800psia = 100F sp.er= 0.68 0.85 3.11b/ft3 viscosity = flowrate = 40\b/ft3 flowrate= 1000bbI/d Design for droplet size removal of 200micronsLi of clean, consolidated sandstone is 12 ohm-m. The sandstone porosity and formation water resistivity are 15% and 0.05 ohm-m. Determine (1) whether the rock is hydrocarbon bearing and, (2) if so, to what extent. (8 points) Rsiz an be-ls Ror 05 am Fe -$l ae Pe ea Be Fe BT ee Roz ee Rod Rt = HE beac ——— & % ae Sat ye. Ts. 0-38 = 8.73% So=(1-50) = (} - 6.3673)/ Wx all the parameters that have to be taken into account for correcting apparent resistivity values. In what order the corrections are applied. Of these parameters which ones can be neglected when correcting Ra reading for a microresistivity tool? (10 points) , 2 dan borehole diameter De cesinticity of Socwation ©ea., sisttiey ot red © hing - mradeake iekness BD Rene = maceake eesishivity onder of cgnrechien: (9 ds depth of invasion Oa Re hme, doh _ (2 Rrodish (Invaded ) resistive dy © eve- ind esishiv'ly sie teag EBB Une) By - resisblally of suewmnding beds Nighel? tebikclnes, BB vertial reschabon betehole elect y Ve bed Hckness,h 5. Figure 1 shows a section of mirologs along with SP and microcaliper taken in a sand- Shale sequence of rocks. Using the logs answer the fllosing: eee Ya) What is the bit size used to drill this well? 4p) What is the maximum borehole diameter shown in the section") — eet c) Is there a major zone of mudcake formation? If yes, what is the mudcake thickness in this zone? Yes) 5150-52264, Zen b8- Cr» (Gm -BH)/22( Jy" sack) Ja) “What is the average value of SP in the prominent porous zone? Is this value SSP or PSP; give reasons? -20-V, 55, bA ot platen of SP deflection — e) Identify the porous and permeable zones on the log. Give your reasons for why you think these zones are porous and permeable. (20 points) (Whenever possible give your answers in fractions) these gones in blue are poroas + permeable bh the $P detects are noceul =7 Ros? Rev 32 Mud Zavason, alsy the ceedings Beer the MINOR PALNV show as Phat mad invasiin ig peecent @ dhere % permenble sporeus characlerri heen Hese uo zones6. Figure 2 shows SP, gamma ray, caliper and three resistivity logs. The zone of interest is between 5704 and S718 ft a) Is Rmf> Rw in this zone? Give your reasons. b) Determine Rt, Rxo and di at 5706 ft ©) Mark all the sandy zones on the log and estimate their thickness using SP. (20 points) WA) Yes, bh SP deflection is normal =7 Be? Ra a7 mad invion Bt Rereuee 7 Rome Pe 82 . . oon . oe IL ILm SFLU ys . Be a 3 . ; 5 ka Ys am ws We 39 ay! o = “ B) 84" esse an C8) Beet RR | ete tte See Be _—_ Se Bon 5 # (<) | Soe Ligure Z plotaaus thicker cleener sends (5?) _ potated =p thinnesy diedy sands (PSP) 2g Vad Sas om Lor = ool mnThe following data was obtained in a Miocene sand section: Essp = -55mV Formation temperature= 108F win Rmf=1366 ohmm at 68P iol x Se Rice 0.8L Am Rsh= 0.9 ohm-m at 108 F ‘Rw measured in the laboratory on a reliable formation water sample at 68 F is, 0.092 ohm-m. ——Rugge .otax HE = Rye 0.84 Ro Assuming that the in-situ water contains aly NaCl, calculate Rw using three different methods. Which method gives the best value of Rw? K =61.3+0.133T (where T is in F) ; Membrane efficiency = 0.47 + 0.3 Rsh (18 points) ke G13 4 6.193(J0PF) Race Eup lg hag) age ~$5 2-35.54 Ing ( a/) a doy ( "Blase Te.54 = Run 0.8 Lun Pets Ui. psz[o.08 “) mrenteene eLlicleneys 0-47 # (6 5%.4) = 0.74 Rate 0.866 WN Ruz 0-04 00 ¢ 6.655 Begs 2 7 0.0725 2m Toh Rox 0.085 = # tS is the must apeunhe On my honor, Laffirm that I have neither given nor received inappropriate aid in the completion of this test Signature: ‘eraure 23/206 Kye Boe oT q3> € é eG a \w e oi w ae f 0 Fig. 3 Ry or Rag, Ohm + m Fig. 625—GP can coneaced for membrane efniy vale of a rom FOU et ee eed = ot __|se GL a Als " a 5 ~ ES : ff a & 2 is o iS = Fig. 4 = Taba nas ° | Jey } | i ‘a 4 1 e Rw or Rmt, Ohm +mDIL* Dual Induction - SFL* Spherically Focused Log (D—IM—SFL “JR, ~ 100 12sFig. 6