‘Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects Page 1 of 3
i Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects Ucse ae
sg pacuniiais
- Ovi mo Cops
} save my progress and resume later | Resume a previously saved form
PART 1. SUMMARY INFORMATION
[pmmny Bay Anca GRANT APPLICATION
| AiRQuauty ‘TFCA REGIONAL FUND PROGRAM i
[, Mawacemenr ‘SHUTTLE/FEEDER BUS PROJECTS
FYE 2014
J Distarer
NOTE: This application will work best using Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox browsers.
Date of Grant Application * 2/24/2013
in Francisco Municipal Transportation Agen’
SL ate
i Name of Project © = Cian: ay
Total Project Cost ($) @ 1275816.95
Legal Name of Applicant Organtzation *
‘Total TFCA Regional Funding Requested ($) @ 190000
Mailing Address:
Street or P.O. Box Address * One South Van Ness Ave, 8th Fis
City * San Francisco 4
1 Couny + [an arenes Ta |
re |
19+ |
Primary Project Contact Info:
(serves as single point of contact for day-to-day communications) '
‘Name * Suzanne Wang
} Posttion/Title * Principal Analyst
http://www. tfaforms.com/forms/view/306940/914a0b66c04958fcl 1d8b31c9c32560c/327... 12/24/2013 ~huttle/Feeder Bus Projects Page 3 of 3
Proposed Implementation Schedule:
Include Key interim milestone dates. All projects must commence in calendar year 2014.
Project Start
Project Completion * 71/27/2015
Complete Environmental Review (if applicable) N/A
‘Activity or Milestone
Other Milestone ‘Add another milestone
|Next Page
Save my progress and resume later | Resume a previously saved form
cei is fame
http://www tfaforms.com/forms/view/306940/9 1 4a0b66c04958fe] 1d8b3 1c9c32560c/327... 12/24/2013 Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects Page 1 of 5
Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects
Pose: 112121413
Ei save my progress and resume later | Resume a previously saved form
PART 2, DETAILED INFORMATION
‘Total TFCA Regional Funding Requested ($) 190000.00,
Total Matching Funds ($) 1085816.95
Total Project Cost ($) 1275816.95
If the project includes more than one shuttle route, this section must be submitted for each distinct route, To add
‘another route, click on “add another route” on the bottom right-hand corner ofthis section,
f° Route 4
Name of service route: * UCSF Mission Bay Shuttle
‘A. PROPOSED BUDGET
Provide a project budget below, broken out by operation and administrative costs (for TFCA Regional Funds) and |
‘operation costs ony (for Matching Funds). Any other costs should be excluded from the project budget. If match
funding 's derived from more than a single source, specify each funding source and the amount of match funds on a
separate line,
‘TFCA Regional Funds Line Item
Source
TFCA Regional Funds |
‘TFCA Regional Funds Line item
Item Shuttle Operation
‘em. Administrative 3 7 TFA Regional Funds
Total TFCA Regional Funds for Route ($) 190000.00
‘Matching Funds Line Item ¢ (if necessary, add additional tines)
Matching Funds Line Item Estimated Cost (5)
Item Shuttle Operation OssE ‘Add tne iter
‘Total Matching Funds for Route ($) 1085816.95
+t Matching Funds any TFCA County Program Manager funds are used ata match, these must be Usted Project sponsors must provide @
‘minimum of 10% matching funds from aon-TFCA sources. TFCA County Program Manager fonds may NOT be used towards fling this |
requirement.
http://www. tfaforms.com/forms/view/306940/914a0b66c04958fcl 1d8b31c9¢32560c/327... 12/24/2013 Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects
Page 3 of 5
Total (Maximum 100%) 100,00,
3. Priority Development Area
Will the route project operate in a designated Planned @ Yes © No
‘or Potential Priority Development Area (PDA?
If “yes", using the map, indicate in the table below the percentage of time each route project will operate in a
“Planned” or “Potential” Priority Development Area. Use the “zoom in” tool to enlarge the map to best identify
boundaries and PDA codes.
Code Percent Operation
PDA SFO4 Tt oT ‘Add another PDA
PDA SFOS ” 10
Total (Maximum 100%) 100.00
C, ROUTE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION
1. Type of Shuttle Route Service
Is the shutt!
route service new or existing @ Now Plot route (at least 70% unique)
service? * © Existing route
© Modification to existing service route
2, Vehicle Trips to Be Reduced by a Project: The data provided below will be used to calculate the number of
vehicle trips that would be reduced as a result of the proposed project.
upLoaD:
Demand Assessment Survey Data ¢ @
Demand Assessment Survey Statement_UCSF Shuttle.xis ElUpload a different file
Ridership data (annual boardings) for three
years of operation +
e
Projected Ridership Estimate UCSF Shuttle.xisx ElUpload a different file
+f data for multiple-route projects is included in one Excel workbook, upload the workbook only once,
4# Days per year that service will be provided: * 253
http://www.tfaforms.com/forms/view/306940/914a0b66c04958fcl 1d8b31¢9c32560c/327... 12/24/2013, Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects
Name, Make and Model of Retrofit Device on Vehicle (if applicable) Cleaire Advanced Emission Cc
Gross Vehicle Weight * 42,540 Ibs.
‘Max, Passenger Capacity* 63
Total Annual Revenue/Service miles @ + 39000
Tota! Annual Miles @ * 40500
Tota! One-Way Trips/Day * 56
‘Average One-Way Trip Length *
‘# Days/Year of Service * 253
Frequency of Service * ‘Approx. every 15 minutes in |
Fuel Type * [Bio-diesel 5
Yes No N/A
Does the shuttle/feeder bus meet the ADA vehicle standards for wheelchair accessibiity?- @ © ©
Is there comparable paratransit service provided to eligible persons with disabilities? * eee
‘Add another vehicle
Page 5 of S
ADD ANOTHER ROUTE
{Previous Page} | Next Page}
Save my progress and resume later | Resume a previously saved form
http:/Awww.tfaforms.com/forms/view/306940/9 14a0b66c04958fc 1 1d8b31¢9c32560c/327...
12/24/2013 Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects Page 1 of 1
Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects
Pages 112121413
Bisave my progress and resume later | Resume a previously saved form
PART 3. CHECKLIST OF SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS TO SEND WITH PRINTED COPIES OF APPLICATION
Ensure that the following attachments are included with the application by checking off the following list on the
two printed copies ofthis application:
All shuttle/feeder bus projects:
oocumentation forall matching funds that wall be applied to the project.
EAA signed Letter of Commitment or Resolution authorizing the submittal of the application identifying the individual
authorized to submit and carry out the proposal.
NIP Cprinted raw survey data (exported in an Excel spreadsheet).
‘Document showing methodology for all calculations used, including assumptions and equations.
[ZGocuments foreach vehicle that wil be providing service including
1) A copy ofthe vehicle’ current Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) registration,
132) Executive Order for engine, and
5 Executive Order of retrofit device,
% map and schedule for each service route.
WIP Cooocumentaton that the project complies with TFCA Policy #27 ifthe appicant is nota transit agency (see Appendix
‘Ain Grant Application Guidance).
if applicable.
In addition:
Existing shuttle/feeder bus projects:
Dibata showing ridership for the past three (3) years.
Pilot suttte/feeder bus projects:
oR Documentation showing demand for the service including letters of support from potential users and providers.
‘Tp
TIA description of plans for self-financing/funding this service in future years. Include letters of support from
potential users and financial supporters,
{_Previous Page _} | Next Page
Save my progress and resume later | Resume a previously saved form
este wt ett
http:/hwww.tfaforms.com/forms/view/306940/9 1 4a0b66c04958fe1 1d8b31c9c32560¢/327... 12/24/2013 Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects Page 1 of 2
Shuttle/Feeder Bus Projects
Pree:
raat
Eli save my progress and resume later | Resume a previous\ form
PART 4. CERTIFICATION AND SURVEY
Applicant must read and initial each item below to indicate understanding and agreemer
| understand that this application is for evaluation purposes only and does nat guarantee project funding.
Initial:
| certify that the proposed project and the emission reductions that would be realized from it are not required by any
federal, state or local regulation, judicial order, agreement, memorandum of understanding, contract, mitigation
requirement, or other binding obligation that requires the project applicant to implement any portion of the project.
Initial
| certify that all matching funds have been disclosed and that this application is for service, equipment/ vehicle(s)/
tengine(s) that neither have been already been funded, nor are currently under consideration for funding by another air
district, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) or by another public agency.
Initial:
| certify that to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in this application and in any documentation
accompanying this application or submitted in furtherance of this application is true and accurate and | understand that.
any misstatements or omissions of material facts may disqualify this grant application and any monies awarded based
ont.
inital:
| understand and agree that no costs funded by this program can be incurred until after the notice of award and after a
funding agreement is executed between the project sponsor (grantee) and the Air District.
Initial:
| certify that | have the legal authority to apply for funding on behalf of the applicant entity and that | am authorized
to sign this application on behalf of applicant.
Signed; ate:
(Authorized Representative of Applicant)
Name Joel C. Goldberg Title Manager, Capital Procurement and #
©res ©No
http:/hwww.tfaforms.com/forms/view/306940/9 14a0b66c04958fe11d8b31¢9c32560c/327... 12/24/2013 Wang, Suzanne
From: Flynn, Jeffrey
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 2:15 PM
To: Wang, Suzanne S.
ce: Pease, Andrew
Subject: Re: TFCA Shuttle Local Match Confirmation
They are.
On Dec 23, 2023, at 1:39 PM, "Wang, Suzanne S." wrote:
Hideff,
Hope you are having a nice day.
‘The TFCA Shuttle grant applications require that we document the local match portion of the 82X and
UCSF Mission Bay Extension projects coming from SFMTA operating funds.
My question to you ls: Are the 82X and UCSF Mission Bay Extension a a part of your FY1S budget?
Many thanks!
‘Suzanne JX, SFMTA
pI Municipal
YF Transportation
December 24, 2013
Karen Schkolnick, District Grant Programs Manager
‘Strategic Incentives Division
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
939 Ellis Street
San Francisco, CA 941 09
eens §
Sublect: SFMTA Request for TFCA Regional Fundirig — Shuttle Service
Dear Ms. Schkolnick: poy
i
Enclosed please find the San Francisco ee traibfeaton Agency's (SFMTA)
applications for TFCA funding for Shuttle Bus Service for our 82X and UCSF Mission Bay
Extension lines. The SFMTA confirms that the proposals submitted for the shuttle bus
service willbe cared out as required Inthe application guidance,
If our projects are selected, we will provi fe Tequied matshig funds to cover all costs
In excess of the grant amotint,
Ifyou have any questions) please call Joe! Goldberg at.(415) 701-440 or emma hi
Joel goldberg@sfmta,com,
‘Thank you for your consideration ofthe San Franson ‘Transportation Agency's
‘TFCA applications.
Sincepaly,
Pn SB
SonaliBose #2),
Chief Financial Officer
1 South Van Ness Avenue 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103 ‘TFCA-R SHUTTLE/FEEDER SERVICE GRANT APPLICATION FOR
SFMTA UCSF MISSION BAY SHUTTLE
Methodologies Employed for Various Calculations
1. Total Project Cost Calculation:
The total project cost was calculated by using SFMTA’s defined FY12 hourly rate per
mode amount for motor coaches, which is the vehicle type that is proposed for use on
the UCSF Mission Bay Shuttle route. Specifically, the FY12 total hourly rate per mode
($169.76) was multiplied by the shuttle’s proposed number of operational hours per
daily peak hours (28) and by the number of operational service days in a year (253).
‘Since SFMTA’s hourly modal rate increases by about three percent each year, this
product was multiplied by 1.03 and then by 1.03 again to reach a total FY14 cost
projection of $1,275,816.95.
2. Ridership Estimate:
‘The annual ridership estimate for the UCSF Mission Bay Shuttle is based on the capacity
of the vehicles that will be used on the route, the number of vehicles that will be used
on the route, and the amount of time the vehicles will operate on the route.
‘Specifically, based on current usage of other transit routes operating in the Mission Bay
area, the shuttle has an estimated capacity utilization during the AM peak period of 20
percent in the inbound direction and 70 percent in the outbound direction, and during
the PM peak period of 70 percent in the inbound direction and 20 percent in the
outbound direction. For both peak periods, these percentages were applied to the
product resulting from the multiplication of the total vehicle capacity (63) by the
‘number of trips per hour (4) by the number of hours during the peak period (three in
the AM and four in the PM). These resulting amounts were then multiplied by the
number of operational days per year (253) and then totaled together, for a sum of just
‘over 400,000 annual riders.
3. Percentage of Passengers that Previously Drove Alone:
This percentage was taken from MTC’s Commuter Profile, which shows that 67 percent
of Bay Area commuters drive alone as their primary commute mode. 4. Average One-Way Commute Distance of Riders that Previously Drove Alone:
This calculation was derived from MTC’s Commuter Profile, which states an average Bay
Area commute trip distance of 16 miles one-way.
5. Percent of Passengers or Participants that Drive to Access Service or to Reach Final
Destination:
Due primarily to a lack of available parking and convenience within its corridor, the UCSF
Mission Bay Shuttle is not expected to have riders that drive a vehicle for the purpose of
directly accessing the service.
6. Average One-Way Trip Distance Driven to Access the Service or to Reach Final
Destination:
Due primarily to a lack of available parking and convenience within its corridor, the UCSF
Mission Bay Shuttle is not expected to have riders that drive a vehicle for the purpose of
directly accessing the service.
7. Total Annual Revenue Service Miles:
The annual revenue service miles total was calculated by multiplying the round-trip
route distance (four) by the number of vehicles used per hour (four) by the span of
service (seven hours) by the number of operational service days per year (253). This
returns a product of just under 39,000.
8. Total Annual Miles:
The annual miles total was calculated by multiplying the annual revenue service miles
total by 1.05. SFMTA
itp Tempore Agcy
Budget: UCSF Mission Bay Shuttle
Based on prior year actuals:
ft daysiyear of service 253
hours of operationiday 28
| Fv12 Total
MOTOR BUS FY12 | Cost-UCSF
HourlyRates* | Mission Bay
Shuttle
VEHICLE OPERATION:
Operating Expenses (F-30) line 158 5 141,673,869
‘Transit Ageney Sve (S-10) Revenue Hours 41,452,262
Hourly Rete per Mode s 97.55.| $ 691,072.08
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE:
Operating Expenses (F-30 ine 156 s 49,393,835,
‘Transit Agency Sve ($10) Revenue Hours 4,452,262
Hourly Rate per Mode s 34.01 | § 240,998.57
NON-VERICLE MAINTENANCE:
Operating Expenses (F-30) line 15¢ $ 9,578,315
“Transit Agency Sve (S-10) Revenue Hours 4,452,262
Hourly Rate per Mode 5 6.60 S 40,722.14
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE:
(Operating Expenses (F-30) fine 15d $ 45,884,028
‘Transit Agency Sve (S-10) Revenue Hours 41,452,262
Hourly Rate per Mode 3 31.59 | § _223,81808
‘TOTAL MODAL EXPENSES:
Operating Expenses Summary excl DR s 246,590,047
“Transit Agency Sve (S-10\(FF10) Revenue Hours 4,452,262
ANTICIPATED TOTAL COSTS FOR
1 YEAR OF SHUTTLE OPERATIONS
"2016 Hourly rates calculated by operating expense and transit agency service revenue hour data fre
FY2013-14 costs assume a 3% annual inflation rate THIS VALIDATED REGISTRATION CARD OR A FACSIMILE COPY IS TO, BE KEPT WITH THE
VEHICLE FOR WHICH ISSUED. THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN THE VEHICLE
IS LEPT UNATTENDED. IT NEED NOT BE DISPLAYED. PRESENT IT TO ANY PEACE
OFFICER UPON DEMAND. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE A RENEWAL NOTICE, USE THIS FORM
0 PAY YOUR RENEWAL FEES OR NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE
NON-OPERATIONAL (PNO) STATUS OF A STORED VEHICLE ($10). RENEWAL FEES MUST
BE PAID ON OR BEFORE THE REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE OR THE FOLLOWING
PENALTIES WILL BE DUE:
* FOR A PERIOD OF 1-10 DAYS LATE, 10% OF THE FEES DUE FOR’ THAT YEAR.
FOR A PERIOD OF 11-30 DAYS LATE, 20% OF THE FEES DUE FOR THAT YEAR.
FOR A PERIOD OF 31 DAYS TO 1 YEAR LATE, 60% OF THE FEES DUE FOR THAT YEAR.
FOR A PERTOD OF MORE THAN 1 YEAR, UP TO AND INCLUDING 2 YEARS LATE, 80%
OF THE FEES DUE FOR THAT YEAR.
FOR A PERIOD OF MORE THAN 2 YEARS LATE, 160% OF THE FEES DUE FOR THAT
YEAR.
wae
EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE FROM YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY MUST BE PROVIDED
0 THE DEPARTMENT WITH THE PAYMENT OF RENEWAL FEES, EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY
INSURANCE IS NOP REQUIRED WITH REGISTRATION RENEWAL OF OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES,
TRAILERS, VESSELS, OR IF YOU FILE A PNO ON THE VEHICLE. -
WHEN WRITING TO DMV, ALWAYS GIVE YOUR FULL NAME, PRESENT ADDRESS, AND THE
VEHICLE’S MAKE, LICENSE, AND IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS.
SHosprticniere: DO NOT DETACH - REGISTERED OWNER INFORMATION ###ikires Haw ae
M0
i REGISTRATION CARD VALID FROM: 00/00/0000 To: 12/31/2099 |
rane YRMDE —-YRIST SOLO MLE CLASS TYPE. VEH Wee UIC LICENSE NuMBER
NEOPL 2000. 2000 Mi 318 33 1083095
GDY TYPE HoOOEL AKON UNLADEN WT VEECLE TO NBER
BU D FZ 2 xX 30120 ANSTALCA6YL013396
TYPE VERICLE USE OATE TSSUED CL/ALCD.«=COT FEE RECYD «PIC
COMMERCIAL 12/05/00 38 12/05/00 5
PERM EXEMPT
REGISTERED: ObNER ‘NOUNT PAID
CY/CNTY SAN FRAN S§NFEE
MISC 7358102 {MOUNT OUE AvOUNT RECIO
1800 JERROLD AVE § NONE CASH
is CHCK
SAN FRANCISCO CRDP :
cA 94124
LoevwoueR
00 503 AB 0000000 0027 CS .cOO 120500 33 1083095 396 “68S 86789ZT Ef LOTOSO 00D WO TTOO 0000000 4a €0S 000
waCTOHNT
vELtE w
? aaa OOSIONWaA NWS
+ MOHD
> HSWO HNON $ HAW aIowasl 008T
AQ34 LNNORY and INNONY ZOPBSEL OSIW
aaan$ ZOPeSEL *H#OSIN Nwad NWS ALNO/AD
yd LNNONY INMO CRULSTOIY
LdWaxsd Wad
s 40/T0/S0 BE £0/T0/S0 ‘IWIDASNINOD .
old naa 334 1d oomy/99 aansst alva ‘3S STOTH3A SdAL
68S70L9L67d CHHHAT o08szEe x z SN a . og
i ‘waGWNN GT STOTHAA megeyuggvnn Cr) Tad 3dAL AGOe
86Z897T ee ate WwW L00e L002 NOTHO
28@WON 3SN30T7 O17 adAL WGA 3dAL ssvi0 41h 0s Ist A TRGOH UA DA
: 660Z/TE/ZT *OL 0000/00/00 *WOed CITA CaWO NOLLVELSIOSY ;
ANIA A __
y
(page 1 of 2)
ce State of California
‘AIR RESOURCES BOARD
EXECUTIVE ORDER A-21-286
Relating to Certification of New Heavy-Duty Enine® ‘and Vehicles
CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY, INC.
Pursuant tothe authority vested in the Ait Resources Board at Sections 43100, 43101, and 43102 of the
Health and Safety Code; and
Pursuant to the authority vested inthe undersigned at Sections 39515 and 39516 of the Health and Safety
Code and Exeoutive Order G-45-9; and
Pursuant to the December 15, 1998 Settlement Agreement between the Air Resources Board and
‘Cammins Engine Company, Inc. and any “modifications tothe Settlement Agreement;
IT1S ORDERED AND RESOLVED: That the following 2000 model-year Cummins Bnet Company,
seas esel engines are certified for use in motor sovvices with a manufacturer’ gross vehicle weight
rating (GVWR) over 14,000 pounds:
Fuel Type: Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) or Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Displacement Exhaust Emission Control
Y Engine Family Liters es
Yoexu03s9BBS 59 359 ‘Turbocharger
6930) Charge Air Cooler
Powertrain Control Module
‘Heated Oxygen Sensor
“The engine models and codes are listed on attachments.
BE IT ORDERED AND RESOLVED: Thi the fotlowing are the certification exhaust or*sitt!
‘jandards for this engine family in grams PSP A ake horsepower-hour under the Federal Text Procedure
(CFTP#) for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines (Critle 13, California Code of Regulations, Section 1956.8):
‘Non-Methane
‘Hydrocarbons ‘Carbon Monoxide Nitrogen Oxides Particulate Matter
“FTP” 12 155 40 0.10
BEIT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the following are the certification exhaust emission ‘values for thi
engine family in grams per brake horsepower-hour:
‘Non-Methane
‘Hydrocarbons Carbon Monoxide Nitrogen Oxides Particulate Mati:
‘FTP" Ot 12 27 0.08 ee
CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY, INC. EXECUTIVE ORDER A-21-286
(Page 2 of 2)
c [BEIT FURTHER RESOLVED: That forthe listed engits models, the manufacturer has submitted the
BE Tis to demonstrate certification compliance with the "Board's emission control system warranty
‘provisions (Title 13, California Code ‘of Regulations, Sections 2035 et seq.)-
BEIT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the aforementioned engine family has been conditionally certified
subject to the following conditions:
1, The Settlement Agreement isin effect,
2. The manufacturer is in compliance with all applicable certification requirements of
the Settlement Agreement.
ngines certified under this Executive Orde: mist ‘conform to all applicable Catifornia emission
regulations and to all applicable terms and ‘conditions of the Settlement Agreement.
“The Bureau of Automotive Repair will be notified By COPY of this order and attachments.
‘Executed at El Monte, California this BoB day of December 1999.
(PRB, Summerfield, Chel
we ‘Mobile Source Operations Division a ee
cose so 800898
wo °
er ew n08z ® ote 90e¢-6'S8
gee ee SSog@t ©1008 ee ae seap.nn (ea ave. FepoN GUBLATZ 90 UTE
ai r 6 fy “) ; .
eam oo 5 fteate baw need oromennn WasDaHee
canyons sears ey 03 "meu mn
uoyssjwigng MON — “POD S9E00Kd
‘opey owen Anes
pamescoHXaoA Aue ouIgua vest
BOGH KemyBn-uo :Ac6oeo eubu
Auedwiog ouj6ug sujwuinS RUSE UN
2
wuoa crouse pon eui6Ua eae EXECUTIVE ORDER A-at-04s
QB an nesounces oan ae ‘New On-Road Heavy OLy Ege
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board by Health and Safety Code Division 26, Part 5, Chapter 2;
‘and pursuant to the authority vested in the undersigned by Health and Safety Code Sections 39515 end 39516 and
Executive Order G-02-003;
ITIS ORDERED AND RESOLVED: The engine and emission control systems produced by the manufacturer are certified
12s described below for use in on-road motor vehicles with a manufacturer's GVWR over 14,000 pounds. Production
engines shall be in all material respects the same as those for which certification is granted
Tae 7
ear | som oa. areca rEATIRES|
pxbeasune | cuass®
Dicet Diet| HD. i Te CAG oR
TENOR WODELS /COOES (rad power)
T6027 0G FR20165 (50) 6M 500/274: P RADIA (50)
er a ean Sr a Ws aa tat, ron ir ene se
ee ee eer eee eee ne
Folowing ar: fe FTP exhaust onion sander or ty emission rie) an eppcabl, under 13 COR 19564
{Urban bus} or 12 COR 1998-9 (olner han urban busy 2) the EURO and NTE Info under Ur applicable Calforria
‘Sttaust omasion standards and test procedures for neavy-dulydlesel engines and vehices (Test Procedures) end
3) the corresponding certification levels, in g/bhp-hr, for this engine family. “Diesel” CO, EURO and NTE cerlification |
camplance may have been demonstrated By the manufacturer as provided under the appleable Test Procedures nica
Gt oan (a tent led een, CER vote aces we neuen ued on rete ee, Formed
Snes’ Be STS and CERT oss ats tpttan pores 8 COR IED 3S ECR Mose ain proeses)
a
Taig casa ey woahotpocerar FiPtaied Tot Nona, ORDO Espen leap Sun Qe Mesare-oeng Sibaweres Sieim ano
retntpotans’ int “eeniowirunine,” Mot Mccamsunetimeyaten Novara tatcgen Conaten neo Meparcuasree, Neoware
‘BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: Certification to the FEL(s) listed above, 2s applicable, is subject to the following terms,
limitations and conditions. The FEL(s) is the emission level dectared by the manufacturer and serves In lieu of an
‘emission standard for certification purposes in any averaging, banking, or trading (ABT) programs. It will be used for
determining compliance of any engine in this family and compliance with such ABT programs.
BEIT FURTHER RESOLVED: The ited engine models have been certied lo the PM slandard sted above pursuant fo
the Incorporated provision in 40 CFR 86.007-11(g)(2) [three engines for every two early-compliance 0.01g/ohp-hr PM
engines},
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: For the listed engine models the manufacturer has submitted the materials 1o demonstrate
Certification compliance with 13 CCR 1985 ( ‘control labels) and 13 CCR 2035 et seq. (emission control warranty).
Engines certified under this Executive Order must conform to all applicable California emission regulations.
‘The Bureau of Automotive Repair will be notified by copy of this Executive Order.
pee
Executed at El Monte, California on this. 5 day of March 2007.
Pree
Ay pepatie Hebert Chiat
lle Source Operations Division ie EXECUTIVE ORDER Acziaee
7AIR RESOURCES BOARD meee Now Onftad Hore Engin
end parent ae iy vested Inthe Ar Resources Board by Healy and Safety Code Division 26, Parl 5, Chapter 2
Pr eaUant{o the authory vested inthe undersigned by Health and Safely ods Sections 30st and sosit ea
Executive Order G-02-003;
TIS ORDERED AND RESOLVED: The engine and emission control systems produced by the manufacturer are certified
Secoserbed below for use in on-road motor vehicies with a manufacturers GVWR over 14{000 pounds, Peoite
engines shall be In a material respects the same as those for which cerification is granted,
nn a eee 2
ey eve run | gags, [nek re tear | ee sear ce La
2008 | 8CEXHO8S1MAC_ 40.8 Diesel Diesel HHDD LT AC BOA Exemy
coo TUNE MODEL Cone andor?
“0 Seostichmert rong ls
aa oe et ET a)
oe Saree Sa
Sotiictenmstean wes Utenanmannac aon inane uminne wee oan
Sr peiesers Weenies ced sonra sna staan crnp nares oor ro men
a ee
Ferner atest een 202 Heaeeex euaproe
[Re azeaeyeNe = et yam: Nikretwpphesule (2g. Ono spins an wansegy eE or —
Byte CORE athe ETP exaust emission standards, or famly emission lini) as applicable, under 13 CGR 10560;
2) the EURO and NTE limits under the applicable: a extol emission standards snd eat preecsnoes Te Fy
Sypadetet engines and vehi (Test Procedures; and 3) the corespondingcertcalon loves for ie eealte fey
SDigel Go, BURG ana NTE corhcatos comple nay nes Soe oon car by the manufacturer as provided
wana Space eee oraure I ia of esting. ee ond ua! wages CNT vats Wes en
when tsi on porvetons tata. or and GERT value or dele cperaton porated n15 COk 1sSb a ae e
paroineses)-
i a Be aR ss oa Te
jones [re | no [ee Tae re] a Pe] a
[sw os |_os E Sees eee [SSRs aoe fame fee =
35
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: Certification to the FEL(s) listed above, as ppplicable, 's subject to the following terms,
is sar io icon pcbeoe revs coca) ho and (RT programs wl be ee for
mission standard for carifcation purposes in any aversging, barking as Sone aE a
4etermiing compliance of any engine iii famty and Conan aes tes ABV ee
the Moonee RESOLVED: The lsted engine models have been certified to the PM standard listed above pursuant to
{he Incorporated provision In 40 CFR 86,007-11(6)2) [8 for 2 early compliance with the O Otgfohpear Bik ctemergy
Ce ETHER RESOLVED: For the listed ongine models the manufacturer has submitted the materials to demonstrate
™ compliance with 18 CCR 1865 (emission contol labels) and 13 CCR 2036 ot Seg. (emission contol waraniy
Enghnes certified under this Executive Order must conform to all applicable California emission regulations,
‘This Executive Order hereby cancels and supersodes Executive Order A-021-0466 deted January 18, 2008,
‘The Bureau of Automotive Repair wil be notified by copy of his Executive Order. .
Executed at Ei Monte, California on this__ 2° __day of February 2008,
‘Annette Hebert, Chiet
Mobile Source Operations Division AOU 066-1
[fares fa ise ati Baek Far ie
‘owes wod | zat wee
‘srweawod | ear iz
[ar uer od} —zar ise
‘SL wa od | eer ase
‘area Wod_ | zer ae,
SL wea Wod | or ae
__ | 31 wer wos] ear ae,
__| (at uea wad | —zar wae
_[ ores nea} aa wee,
“or Wea Wod | zen Wee,
DyP'u wos wos "Tod_zet uaz oz ooce@oos "cos wei sax
RING yw mace) waaay
i, Se, Se. Sea ee ee
SENT eae AO SITES, WERE, LGR PNT meas State of California
AIR RESOURCES BOARD
EXECUTIVE ORDER DE-10-004-04
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board (ARB) by the
Health and Safety Code, Division 26, Part 5, Chapter 2; and pursuant to the authority
vested in the undersigned by Health and Safety Code Sections 3951 and 39516 and
Executive Order G-02-003;
Relating to Exemptions under Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code, and Verification
under Sections 2700 to 2711 of Title 13 of the Califomia Code of Regulations (CCR)
Cleaire Advanced Emission Controls, LLC (Cleaire)
LongMile™ System
ARB has reviewed Cleaire's request for verification of the LongMile™ system (system).
Based on an evaluation of the data provided and pursuant to the terms and conditions
specified below, the Executive Officer of ARB hereby finds that the Cleaire LongMile™
system reduces emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM) consistent with a Level 3
Plus device (greater than or equal to an 85 percent reduction and meets the 2009
nitrogen dioxide emissions limit) (Title 13, CCR, Sections 2702 (f) and 2708).
Accordingly, the Executive Officer determines that the system merits verification and,
subject to the terms and conditions specified below, classifies the LongMile™ system as.
a Level 3 Plus system for heavy-duty on-road vehicles that use certified heavy-duty
diesel engines. Engines for which the LongMile™ system is verified, the verified parts
list, the verified labels, swapping and re-designation information, and other product
information can be found here:
http://www. .gov/diesel/verdevicompanies/cleaire/longmile.htm,
The aforementioned verification is subject to the following terms and conditions:
+ The engine must be used by an on-road motor vehicle with a manufacturer's
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of over 14,000 pounds.
* The application must have a duty cycle with a temperature profile greater than
260 degrees Celsius for at least 7 percent of the time,
* The engine must be in its original certified configuration,
‘+ The engine may or may not employ exhaust gas recirculation.
* The engine may or may not be certified to have an original equipment manufacturer
(OEM) diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC). * The engine must not be certified to have an OEM diesel particulate filter (DPF).
‘+The engine must be certified for on-road applications at a PM emission level of at
most 0.1 grams per brake horsepower-hour (g/bhp-hr), and greater than
0.01 g/bhp-hr. Included in this verification are model year 1993 certified engines
certified above the 0.1 g/bhp-hr level which would meet this level when using fuel
that has a sulfur content of no more than 15 parts per million (ppm) by weight.
+ The engine's displacement must be between 6.3 and 16.0 liters, inclusive.
* The engine must have a four-stroke combustion cycle.
© The engine must be turbocharged.
* The engine must be well maintained and not consume lubricating oil at a rate greater
than that specified by the engine manufacturer.
«Lube oil, or other oil, must not be mixed with the fuel.
‘+ The engine must be operated on fuel that has a sulfur content of no more than
15 ppm by weight.
+ The system must not be operated with fuel additives, as defined in Section 2701 of
Title 13 of the CCR, unless explicitly verified for use with the fuel additive(s).
«The system must not be used with any other systems or engine modifications
without ARB and manufacturer's approval.
+ The other terms and conditions specified below.
ITIS ALSO ORDERED AND RESOLVED: That installation of the LongMile™ system,
manufactured by Cleaire Advanced Emissions Controls of 14775 Wicks Boulevard,
San Leandro, California, 94577, has been found not to reduce the effectiveness of the
applicable vehicle pollution control system, and therefore the LongMile™ system is,
‘exempt from the prohibitions in Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for installation on
heavy-duty on-road vehicles. This exemption is only valid provided the engines meet
the aforementioned conditions.
The LongMile™ system consists of the following major system components, listed in
order from exhaust inlet to outlet as they are arranged within the exhaust system of the
vehicle: one inlet cone, one DOC, one sintered metal DPF with a containment shroud,
one spark arrestor, and one outlet cone, The LongMile™ system also includes a
backpressure monitor, two temperature sensors, and warning system. The major
components of the LongMile™ system are identified in the parts list. The parts list and
schematics of the approved product and engine labels are available on the website
shown above. The LongMile™ system is comprised of a single DOC and a single sintered metal DPF
designed to filter the exhaust from a single engine. LongMile™ systems with multiple
DPFs and/or multiple DOCs, including designs with two or more filter components
canned together or multiple individually-canned filter components in parallel or in series
(or any combination thereof), are not valid under this Executive Order, Channeling
exhaust from a single engine through multiple LongMile™ systems, deployed in parallel
or in series or any combination thereof, is also not valid under this Executive Order.
This Executive Order is valid provided that installation instructions for the LongMile™
system do not recommend tuning the vehicle to specifications different from those of the
vehicle manufacturer.
Cleaire must ensure that the installation of the LongMile™ system conforms to all
applicable industrial safety requirements.
No changes are permitted to the device without the written approval of ARB. Changes
from the verified design without written approval of ARB shall invalidate this Executive
Order.
Changes made to the design or operating conditions of the LongMile™ system, as
exempted by ARB, which adversely affect the performance of the vehicle's pollution
control system, shall invalidate this Executive Order.
Marketing of the LongMile™ system using identification other than that shown in this
Executive Order or for an application other than that listed in this Executive Order shall
be prohibited unless prior written approval is obtained from ARB,
This Executive Order shall not apply to any LongMile™ system advertised, offered for
sale, sold with, or installed on a motor vehicle prior to or concurrent with transfer to an
ultimate purchaser.
A copy of this Executive Order must be provided to the ultimate purchaser at the time of
sale.
As specified in Section 2706() (Title 13, CCR) of the Verification Procedure, Warranty
and In-Use Compliance Requirements for In-Use Strategies to Control Emissions from
Diese! Engines (Procedure), ARB assigns each diesel emission control strategy a family
name. The designated family name for the verification as outlined above is:
CAICLE/2010/PM3+/NOO/ON/DPFO1
As stated in the Procedure, Cleaire is responsible for recordkeeping requirements
(Section 2702), honoring the required warranty (Section 2707), and conducting in-use
compliance testing (Section 2709).
Proper engine maintenance is critical for the proper functioning of the diesel emission
control strategy. The owner of the vehicle on which the diese! emission control strategy
is installed is strongly advised to adhere to all good engine maintenance practices.
3 Failure to document proper engine maintenance, including keeping records of the
engine's oil consumption, may be grounds for denial of a warranty claim.
This Executive Order is valid provided that the diesel fuel used in conjunction with the
device complies with Title 13, CCR, Sections 2281 and 2282, and if biodiesel is used,
the biodiesel blend shall be 20 percent or less subject to the following conditions:
* The biodiesel portion of the blend complies with the American Society for Testing
and Materials Specification D6751 applicable for 15 ppm sulfur content, and
¢ The diesel fuel portion of the blend complies with Title 13, CCR, Sections 2281 and
2282.
Other alternative diesel fuels such as, but not limited to, ethanol diesel blends and water
‘emulsified diesel fuel are excluded from this Executive Order.
In addition to the foregoing, ARB reserves the right in the future to review this Executive
Order and the exemption and verification provided herein to assure that the exempted
and verified add-on or modified part continues to meet the standards and procedures of
Title 13, CCR, Section 2222, et seq, and Title 13, CCR, Sections 2700 through 2711.
Systems verified under this Executive Order shall conform to all applicable California
emissions regulations.
The terms and conditions of this Executive Order must be satisfied regardless of where
the system is sold in order for the system to be considered verified.
Cleaire must modify all existing installations of the LongMile system, regardless of
location, such that they conform to the design of the system described by this Executive
Order, which includes the containment, the spark arrestor, the additional temperature
sensor, and the new alarm strategy. As part of the modification, Cleaire must inspect
each installed system for evidence of damage to the filter. All identified filter failures
must be reported back to ARB on a weekly basis as the modifications are carried out. If
certain engine families, engine types, or applications are determined to have failure
rates that exceed 4 percent of installations, the Executive Officer will determine whether
to exclude such engines or applications from the Executive Order accordingly.
This Executive Order does not release Cleaire from complying with all other applicable
regulations,
Violation of any of the above conditions shall be grounds for revocation of this Executive
Order. This Executive Order hereby supersedes Executive Order DE-10-004-03 (dated
June 20, 2011), Executive Order DE-10-004-02 (dated June 16, 2011), Executive Order
DE-10-004-01 (dated January 18, 2011), and Executive Order DE-10-004 (dated
October 18, 2010),
Executed at E! Monte, California, and effective this 8", day of December 2011.
Robert H. Cross, Chief
Mobile Source Control Division SFMTA
nce tegeiny
UCSF Mission Bay Shuttle - Schedule Statement
‘As the UCSF Mission Bay Shuttle is a proposed route, it does not currently have a defined time-based
schedule. However, once launched, the service will run every 18 minutes in both directions between UCSF
Mission Bay and Church Station between the hours of 6:30am and 8:30am and 3:00pm and 7:00pm. Wang, Suzanne
From: Pease, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 10:16 AM
To: Wang, Suzanne S.
Subject: FW:EN CAC Signature for Transit Shuttle Grant Application
Here's my email conversation with Mat Snyder at Eastern Neighborhoods CAC.
From: Pease, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 10:10 AM
‘To: Snyder, Mathew
‘Subject: RE: EN CAC Signature for Transit Shuttle Grant Application
Hi Mat,
‘Thanks very much for providing an update! A letter after 1/13 would still be very helpful, so | would be very appreciative
of your placing it on the agenda for that date’s meeting. And let me know.in the meantime if you need any additional
information. Thank you very much againt
-Andrew
Andrew Pease
“egnstEfectiveness Project (TEP)
“
Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen
- The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good LifeVon EverandThe Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good LifeBewertung: 4 von 5 Sternen4/5 (5794)
- The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You're Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You AreVon EverandThe Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You're Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You AreBewertung: 4 von 5 Sternen4/5 (1090)
- Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On ItVon EverandNever Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On ItBewertung: 4.5 von 5 Sternen4.5/5 (838)
- Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space RaceVon EverandHidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space RaceBewertung: 4 von 5 Sternen4/5 (895)
- Grit: The Power of Passion and PerseveranceVon EverandGrit: The Power of Passion and PerseveranceBewertung: 4 von 5 Sternen4/5 (588)
- Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of NikeVon EverandShoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of NikeBewertung: 4.5 von 5 Sternen4.5/5 (537)
- The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy AnswersVon EverandThe Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy AnswersBewertung: 4.5 von 5 Sternen4.5/5 (345)
- Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic FutureVon EverandElon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic FutureBewertung: 4.5 von 5 Sternen4.5/5 (474)
- Her Body and Other Parties: StoriesVon EverandHer Body and Other Parties: StoriesBewertung: 4 von 5 Sternen4/5 (821)
- The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)Von EverandThe Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)Bewertung: 4.5 von 5 Sternen4.5/5 (121)
- The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of CancerVon EverandThe Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of CancerBewertung: 4.5 von 5 Sternen4.5/5 (271)
- The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy LivingVon EverandThe Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy LivingBewertung: 3.5 von 5 Sternen3.5/5 (400)
- The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first CenturyVon EverandThe World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first CenturyBewertung: 3.5 von 5 Sternen3.5/5 (2259)
- The Yellow House: A Memoir (2019 National Book Award Winner)Von EverandThe Yellow House: A Memoir (2019 National Book Award Winner)Bewertung: 4 von 5 Sternen4/5 (98)
- Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New AmericaVon EverandDevil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New AmericaBewertung: 4.5 von 5 Sternen4.5/5 (266)
- A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True StoryVon EverandA Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True StoryBewertung: 3.5 von 5 Sternen3.5/5 (231)
- Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham LincolnVon EverandTeam of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham LincolnBewertung: 4.5 von 5 Sternen4.5/5 (234)
- On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New DealVon EverandOn Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New DealBewertung: 4 von 5 Sternen4/5 (74)
- The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New AmericaVon EverandThe Unwinding: An Inner History of the New AmericaBewertung: 4 von 5 Sternen4/5 (45)
