Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
As the instructional program was held in a withdrawn setting with an unfamiliar teacher, it
was important to establish a strong sense of community within the group so that students did
not associate the program with negative feelings of removal from the classroom or extra work
(Hyde, Carpenter & Conway, 2010). School environments that are experienced as a
community are known to increase feelings of self-efficacy, students intrinsic motivation, and
overall achievement (Porter, 2007).
This was primarily achieved through the development of positive relationships between the
teacher and the students, which are the strongest influence on learner engagement, interest,
and sense of belonging (Margolis & McCabe, 2006). To build rapport, the teacher met with
each student prior to the commencement of the program to complete a craft activity and find
out more about them (Salend, 2008). This rapport was then maintained throughout the
ID: 2093075
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
program by the teacher by displaying verbal and nonverbal behaviours to let the students
know that she believed that they can succeed, and providing positive and constructive
feedback (Salend, 2008; Briggs & Potter, 1999).
Furthermore, every lesson began with a group chat where all participants were able to share
something with the group (often answering a question such as What did you do on the
weekend?). This reinforced the caring, supportive environment and strengthened teacherto-student relationships, as well as student-to-student (Tomlinson, 2003).
Behaviour management was consistent and explicit over the course of the instructional
program. The students worked with the teacher to establish a set of rules to be followed
during lessons at the beginning of the unit, encouraging them to take ownership of their
behavior (Nelsen, Lott & Glenn, 2000; Porter, 2007). These rules were on display at all times
and were reviewed regularly so that all students knew what was expected of them (Porter,
2007). Similarly, a consistent routine was quickly established (the same for each lesson) so
that students were aware of what they should do, where they should be, and how they should
act (Lewis & Doorlag, 2011).
The physical space was also designed to contribute to the sense of community. Students were
involved in the process of setting up their area in order to give them ownership over their
learning (Salend, 2008). They chose their own seats, created name plates and art work for the
walls, and helped decide where materials should be kept. Furthermore, a round table was
chosen to work at in order to encourage collaborative learning and discussion (Salend, 2008)
and a portable whiteboard was kept close by during every lesson so that it was easily
accessible by students. The classroom was well-lit and brightly decorated (with the art created
by the students as well as previous work and visual supports), but clutter and distractions
(noise and visual) were minimized wherever possible (Allen, Cowdery & Johnson, 2012). The
stretch of wall closest to the table was kept empty so that a removable word wall could be
placed up every lesson.
ID: 2093075
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
Finally, the differentiated instruction implemented by the teacher was also used to establish
the positive learning environment. Students were all working at an appropriate level of
challenge for them, increasing their self-esteem and sense of achievement (Jarvis, 2013;
Tomlinson, 2003). They were also given opportunities to work according to their learning
profiles and in a variety of different ways (e.g. written, oral, drawing, games, group work,
individual work, etc.) (Tomlinson, 2004). Students were able to move at their own pace, and
were not expected to move on until they were comfortable with and displayed understanding
of the concepts being taught (Eggen & Kauchak, 2010).
Ultimately, all of these factors created a positive, well-managed learning environment where
students were supported and encouraged to achieve their goals.
The active participation strategies implemented during this instructional program were
chosen for one of three purposes: involvement (designed to keep students alert and
attentive), rehearsal (provide opportunities to practice information), or processing (increase
comprehension) (Price & Nelson, 2011).
Involvement Strategies
Choral responses from all three students (For example, Teacher says What time of
day is it when you come to school? and all students say Morning). This was effective
as there were only three students in the group so it was easy to monitor who was and
was not responding.
ID: 2093075
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
Brainstorming was used in the first lesson to establish what all three students know
about time. This worked well as the students were able to build on each others ideas.
Response cards were used in once. Students were asked to hold up the appropriate
card for each sentence read out by the teacher. This was not the most effective
strategy as the students were given two cards each (weekday, weekend) so every time
a sentence was read out, they had to spend time processing it, deciding on their
response, and then choosing the correct card from their pile. This strategy would have
been more effective if adapted to only use one card.
Rehearsal Strategies
Having students write down or draw answers on mini whiteboards during group
discussions. This was used once but was found to be distracting for the students who
would scribble on the boards or fiddle with them when they were supposed to be
listening.
Using finger signals from all three students when asking questions (For example,
Teacher asks for a thumbs up or thumbs down and asks a series of questions such as
You eat breakfast in the morning, You go to school at night time). This was a quick
and efficient way to check understanding.
Processing Strategies
The concept of Think-Pair-Share was used in the lessons, in that students were asked
questions and given time to think about the answer before discussing as a group.
However, given that there were only three students, the Pair step was skipped. This
worked well as these particular students often need longer periods of time to process
their ideas.
ID: 2093075
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
While all four objectives involve the concept of time and they are all interrelated, each
requires a different cognitive process. Thus, Anderson & Krathwohl's (2001) learning
taxonomy matrix was used in order to determine the sequence of the POs and the structure
of the instructional program.
Type of
Knowledge
Related performance
objective
Factual
knowledge
Objective 1
Conceptual
knowledge
Objective 2
Procedural
knowledge
Objective 3
Metacognitive
knowledge
Objective 4
ID: 2093075
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
As such, when assessing the students at the end of the program, it was important to collect
evidence towards the achievement of all four POs. Based on these results, and supported by
evidence collected from the formative assessments, it is clear that all three students made
significant progress towards meeting the objectives. An overall summary can be seen below:
Objective 1
Achieved
Achieved
Achieved
Objective 2
Partial
Achieved
Partial
Objective 3
Achieved
Achieved
Achieved
Objective 4
Achieved
Achieved
Achieved
As the table indicates, all students met Objectives 1, 3 and 4. Contrarily, only Patrick displayed
100% success when describing the duration of familiar events, and thus he was the only one
who met Objective 2.
There are a multitude of reasons as to why two of the students may not have achieved
Objective 2. This PO was focused on during one lesson only, and it was the penultimate lesson
of the program (the final teaching lesson). It was obvious even during those 45 minutes that
the students would need additional practice; however, given the time constraints of the 6week practicum, further lessons were not possible. I do not think there were necessarily any
issues with the lesson itself. Contrarily, many evidence-based strategies were implemented
in order to ensure that students were given opportunities to experience the passage of time
practically rather than theoretically (Sullivan, 2011). However, research shows that repetition
and prolonged exploration of concepts is crucial to developing mathematical skills and
understandings (Sullivan, 2011), and that unfortunately was not available to us.
Despite this, I still believe that the overall program was a huge success due to the impressive
progress made by all three students. I think this success can largely be attributed to the
thorough planning done in regards to assessment and instruction prior to its implementation.
ID: 2093075
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
For me, the first step in planning the program involved meeting with the class teacher and
discussing the needs of the students as well as the necessity of the program itself. Given that
the rest of the class was going to be doing some learning about time simultaneously, I wanted
to know why the teacher thought these particular students needed intervention, so that I
could determine how best address those needs (Rudebusch, 2007). The class teacher
explained that a lot of her teaching around time is ingrained throughout her daily curriculum
rather than explicitly taught (particularly the basic concepts). While this is effective for the
majority of the class who already understand the foundational ideas, it is ineffective for these
particular students who do not have that prior knowledge (Fisher & Frey, 2010). Evidently, I
realised that the students would need access to high-quality explicit instruction with
extensive opportunities for exploration and practice (Rudebusch, 2007). For this reason, it
was decided to adopt the gradual release of responsibility model when planning the program.
This model provides the quality core instruction that these students need and is designed to
build student competence and independence by providing examples of the thinking required
to complete the work (Fisher & Frey, 2010, p. 30). Each lesson followed a structure of first
providing teacher-led instruction and modelling, followed by guided instruction, productive
group work, and finally independent practice (Fisher & Frey, 2008).
I found this approach very useful due to the inclusion of modelling at the beginning of each
lesson. During these explicit teaching sessions, I would demonstrate the kind of skills and
understandings that I wanted the students to learn using think-alouds (Price & Nelson,
2011). This made the content clear and usable for students, preparing them for the eventual
guided and independent practice (Heacox, 2002).
Another contributor to the success of the program was the use of mediated scaffolding. By
differentiating parts of the program by readiness, I was able to provide scaffolds whenever
necessary at varying levels of support before gradually withdrawing them (Price & Nelson,
2011). This allowed each student to be successful during instruction and eventually become
independent (Price & Nelson, 2011).
ID: 2093075
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
Furthermore, visual supports were provided frequently throughout the lessons in conjunction
with oral and written cues. For example, when teaching the students the three parts of a day,
they were given opportunities to hear and speak the words, read the words with assistance
from the teacher, and view symbols relating to the words. This strategy was used both as an
accommodation due to the fact that the students are not yet fluent readers (Pagliano &
Gillies, 2008), but also as a method of providing the students with multiple pathways for
understanding and remembering the definition of the vocabulary, increasing the likelihood
that they will commit it to long term memory (Woolfolk & Margetts, 2010).
Assessment was the most difficult part of the planning process for me. In accordance with the
Backward by Design approach, I began by thinking about my final summative assessment first
in order to make sure that it clearly reflected the desired learning outcomes and POs (Wiggins
& McTighe, 2011). I decided to conduct another test-format assessment as this was
consistent with not only the pre-assessment, but also the summative assessment taken by
the rest of their class. As such, I employed a number of accommodations including setting (a
distraction-free space in the relaxation corner of the Special Education room), assistance
with test directions (instructions read out loud by teachers, each instruction read multiple
times, key words underlined), assistance during the assessment (record student responses)
and test format (visual prompts, changed presentation for material into a booklet, large print)
(Elliott, Kratochwill & Schulte, 1999).
Formative assessment was slightly more challenging, but also proved to be imperative to the
success of the program. Throughout the program, I implemented a variety of formative
assessment approaches (including observation, note taking, collection of student work) but
ultimately found exit cards to be the most effective (Cooper & Kiger, 2011). The exit cards
were designed to be simple, short tasks that reflected the big understanding of each lesson
(Jarvis, 2013). These cards were crucial as they were used to determine whether or not we
would continue on with the next lesson, or revise previously taught content (Jarvis, 2013). As
useful as these cards proved to be, I think in future I would consider simplifying them even
further. I found that the students took longer to complete the cards than expected, and as I
ID: 2093075
10
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
had to read the instructions out loud and sometimes explain the task in different ways, the
students could not complete these independently which I believe would have been ideal.
Ultimately, the progress displayed by each student when looking at their post-assessment
results indicates that the program was successful. However, for me, the greatest indicator of
success was observing the gradual generalisation of the skills being taught. I would often see
Tamara around the school whenever I had yard duty, and after a few weeks of the program
she would seek me out to excitedly tell me good morning and explain that she knew it was
morning because she had just arrived at school, or good afternoon because it was lunch
time. Similarly, Anthonys teacher told me a funny story about their daily fitness lessons that
required him to run around the oval for five minutes. Anthony, who is not the biggest fan of
P.E., requested that he only run for five seconds instead because seconds are much quicker
than minutes. Provided with additional practice and time for exploration of these
mathematical concepts, I believe that the students will all achieve the POs and maintain these
skills throughout their lives.
11
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
References
Allen, K., Cowdery, G., & Johnson, J. (2012). Arranging the learning environment. In K. Allen,
G. Cowdery & J. Johnson (Eds.), The exceptional child: inclusion in early childhood
education (7th ed., pp. 331 362). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a
revision of Blooms taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and
Bacon.
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2015). The Australian
Curriculum, v. 7.4. Mathematics Foundation to Year 10. Retrieved from
http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/curriculum/f-10
Briggs, F., & Potter, G. (1999). The early years of school: teaching and learning (3rd ed.)
Sydney, NSW: Pearson.
Cohen, L., & Spenciner, L. (2009). Teaching students with mild and moderate disabilities:
research-based practices (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Cooper, J., & Kiger, N. (2011). Tools for gathering information in the classroom. In J. Cooper
& N. Kiger, Literacy assessment: helping teachers plan instruction (4th ed., pp. 19
48). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Creating productive learning environments: principles and
models of instruction. In P. Eggen & D. Kauchak (Eds.), Educational psychology:
windows on classrooms (8th ed., pp. 388 428), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Harlow
Pearson Education.
Elliott, S., Kratochwill, T., & Schulte, M. (1999). Assessment accommodations checklist:
helping teachers and parents support all students participation in testing programs.
Monterey, CA: McGraw-Hill.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: a framework for
the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2010). Quality core instruction: a necessary first step. In D. Fisher & N.
Frey (Eds.), Enhancing RTI: how to ensure success with effective classroom instruction
and intervention (pp. 29 50), Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
ID: 2093075
12
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
Gargiulo, R., & Kilgo, J. (2010). Designing learning environments for young children with
special needs. In R. Gargiulo & J. Kilgo (Eds.), An introduction to young children with
special needs: birth through age eight (3rd ed., pp. 216 245). Belmond, CA: Cengage
Learning.
Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: how to reach and
teach all learners. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing Inc.
Hyde, M., Carpenter, L., & Conway, R. (2010). Diversity and inclusion in Australian schools.
South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
Jarvis, J. (2013). Differentiating learning experiences for diverse students. In P. Hudson (Ed.),
Learning to teach in the primary school (pp. 52 70). Port Melbourne, VIC:
Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, R., & Doorlag, D. (2011). Coordinating the classroom learning environment. In R.
Lewis & D. Doorlag (Eds.), Teaching students with special needs in general education
classrooms (8th ed., pp. 148 161). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: what to do, what
to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 218 227.
Nelsen, J., Lott, L., & Glenn, H. (2000). Positive discipline in the classroom (3rd ed.). Roseville,
CA: Prima Publishing.
Pagliano, P., & Gillies, R. (2008). Curriculum, adjustments and adaptations. In A. Ashman & J.
Elkins (Eds.), Education for inclusion and diversity (3rd ed., pp. 201 234). Frenchs
Forest, NSW: Pearson.
Porter, L. (2007). Student behaviour: theory and practice for teachers (3rd ed.). Sydney, NSW:
Allen & Unwin.
Price, K. & Nelson, K. (2011). Planning effective instruction: diversity responsive methods and
management (5th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Rudebusch, J. (2007). Guide to RTI: response to intervention. Moline, IL: LinguiSystems, Inc.
Salend, S. (2008). Differentiating large- and small-group instruction. In S. Salend, Creating
inclusive classrooms: effective and reflective practices (6th ed., pp. 376 412). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Stephens, T. (1980). Teachers as managers. The Directive Teacher, 2(5), 4 5.
ID: 2093075
13
EDUC4731
Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
ID: 2093075
14
Daniella Porcaro
APPENDIX A
Unit Plan
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
KNOWLEDGE
Students will know:
the everyday language of
time (e.g. tomorrow,
yesterday, before, after)
the different parts of the
day (e.g. morning,
afternoon, night)
the names of the days of
the week
SKILLS
Students will be able to:
differentiate between
weekdays/the weekend
sequence familiar events
in order
recognise familiar events
in their own everyday
routines
describe the duration of
familiar situations (e.g.
how long until we come
to school?)
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
Why do we have time?
What do you do in a day?
What are the different parts of a day?
How can we tell what time of day it is without using a clock?
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
1. Recognise and be able to communicate the days of the week, and parts of a day (i.e. morning,
afternoon, night) with 100% success.
2. Describe the duration of a familiar event using at least two time vocabulary words (e.g. hours,
days, weeks, months, long, short, fast, slow, tomorrow, yesterday) with 100% success.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
3. Independently sequence a daily timetable in the correct order using picture cards with 100%
success.
4. Choose an appropriate activity or action for a particular time of day or day of the week with
100% accuracy when given a selection of picture cards and objects.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
APPENDIX B
Lesson Plans
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
1. Recognise and be able to communicate the days of the week, and parts of a day (i.e.
morning, afternoon, night) with 100% success.
4. Choose an appropriate activity or action for a particular time of day or day of the week with
100% accuracy when given a selection of picture cards and objects.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Compare and order the duration of events using the everyday language of time
(ACMMG007)
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson students will understand that:
that some activities or events are only appropriate at certain times of the day
the everyday language of time (e.g. today, morning, night, before, after)
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
Computer
Name plates
Youtube Video -
https://www.youtube.com
watch?v=azVSR40ibFo
the day
Exit cards
LESSON SEQUENCE
TIME
LESSON CONTENT
5 mins
Admin
Collect students from classroom and
Review of the three rules the students that all participants (including the
helped come up with at the end of last term
10 mins
food is.
Introduction: Brainstorm
1999).
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Time.
5 mins
Daniella Porcaro
Exploration: Video
(Teacher-directed)
Daniella Porcaro
10 mins
2001).
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
afternoon, or night.
5 mins
Daniella Porcaro
Lesson Closure
Margetts, 2010).
questions.
ASSESSMENT
Formative Assessment The teacher will take notes during the lesson based on observation of
the group discussions (brainstorm, object sort, etc.) including how well students seem to be
grasping the concept, but also how engaged they are and whether they are fully participating,
etc.
Formative Assessment The teacher will collect the exit cards at the end of the lesson and use
this to determine whether the students have understood the content. In order to move on to
the next lesson, all three students must complete the activity correctly.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
REFLECTION/NOTES
The students worked wonderfully today. They were very engaged and seemed to enjoy the
video and object sorting activity in particular. Using manipulatives was a great strategy for these
particular students.
They seemed to grasp the idea of morning and night quite easily. Afternoon is the only thing I
am concerned about as this seemed to confuse them a little bit I think the sun being out in the
morning as well as the afternoon is what causes the confusion. Connecting the concept of
afternoon to lunch time/the end of the school day seemed to resonate with them though.
I was impressed with the brainstorm at the beginning of the lesson. They had some good
general ideas about time used words like sun, clocks, bed time, year, calendar, a long
time, etc. and gave some specific examples of times (e.g. 9 oclock)
The exit cards (see below) showed me that they understood the content, which means we are
able to move on next week.
Name ___________________
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
1. Recognise and be able to communicate the days of the week, and parts of a day (i.e.
morning, afternoon, night) with 100% success.
3. Independently sequence a daily timetable in the correct order using picture cards with
100% success.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Compare and order the duration of events using the everyday language of time
(ACMMG007)
(Taken from the Foundation and Year 1 Content Descriptors) (ACARA, 2015).
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson students will understand that:
that some activities or events are only appropriate at certain times of the day
the everyday language of time (e.g. today, morning, night, before, after)
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
Post-it notes
Pegs
Clothesline
Exit Cards
LESSON SEQUENCE
TIME
LESSON CONTENT
5 mins
Admin
Teacher collects students from
seats.
brushed my teeth, had breakfast, played with to start thinking about the concept of
my brother).
Review last lesson exit card and
word wall.
10 mins Introduction: Modelling Timelines
(Teacher facilitated, interactive instruction)
The teacher will show the students a
Daniella Porcaro
dinner)
learning)
learning.
day.
10
Daniella Porcaro
scaffolding/prompting/support
necessary.
(Student-centred learning)
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
11
Daniella Porcaro
their families.
Closure
The teacher will thank the students
questions.
Before they leave, the students will fill out loud and give students time to
out a short exit card and hand it to the
choice.
ASSESSMENT
Formative Assessment The teacher will make notes throughout the lesson based on
observations made throughout the group discussions (e.g. when sorting the images on the
timeline). Things to look out for include: students are using the correct vocabulary to describe
times of the day, and can tell you what happened first, and uses next for subsequent events.
Formative Assessment The teacher will collect the exit cards at the end of the lesson and use
this to determine whether the students have understood the content well enough to continue
to the next lesson.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
12
Daniella Porcaro
REFLECTION/NOTES
The students had another great lesson today. They were very excited when I pulled out the
photographs that their class teacher had taken throughout the week. They also seemed to really
like that I had included some photos of myself in there. I think this was a great strategy to not
only build rapport with the students, but to increase the sense of community it is obvious
that they feel like we are a team, which is exactly what I wanted!
They all seemed to handle the content really well today, although the conversation was
dominated by Patrick. The Think-Pair-Share strategy was effective as it gave Tamara and
Anthony a chance to process their thoughts without worrying about Patrick jumping in with the
answer right away.
The exit card shows that they understand the basic concept of sequencing in that they can
identify what events occurred first, second, third, etc.
I feel that they are ready to move on to slightly more complicated sequencing tasks in the next
lesson.
Name ___________________
Number these events in the order that
we did them today.
We drew pictures.
We made a special book.
We created a timeline with photos of us.
We walked to Room 18.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
13
Daniella Porcaro
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
2. Recognise and be able to communicate the days of the week, and parts of a day (i.e.
morning, afternoon, night) with 100% success.
4. Independently sequence a daily timetable in the correct order using picture cards with
100% success.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Compare and order the duration of events using the everyday language of time
(ACMMG007)
(Taken from the Foundation and Year 1 Content Descriptors) (ACARA, 2015).
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson students will understand that:
that some activities or events are only appropriate at certain times of the day
the everyday language of time (e.g. today, morning, night, before, after)
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
14
Daniella Porcaro
Whiteboard + markers
Word Wall
Examples of timetables
Exit cards
LESSON SEQUENCE
TIME
LESSON CONTENT
5 mins
(laminated)
Admin
Teacher collects students from
seats.
Doorlag, 2011).
word wall.
5 mins
signals.
Daniella Porcaro
definition of timetable/timeline as
(Interactive learning)
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
16
Daniella Porcaro
(Student-centred teaching)
level.
of sequencing.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
17
Daniella Porcaro
Closure
The teacher will thank the students
questions.
Before they leave, the students will fill instructions and describe the
out a short exit card and hand it to the
choice.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
18
Daniella Porcaro
ASSESSMENT
Formative Assessment The teacher will use the photos of the timetables created by the
students and assess whether or not they have met the learning objectives (i.e. they were able to
correctly sequence a series of familiar events in chronological order).
Formative Assessment The teacher will collect the exit cards at the end of the lesson and use
this to determine whether the students have understood the content well enough to continue
to the next lesson. If they do not all answer the question correctly, there will be another lesson
about timetables to solidify this learning.
REFLECTION/NOTES
The students were very restless today! It seemed unanimous among the three of them. I
reminded them of our rules using the rules poster they created which seemed to settle them a
little bit.
All three students participated in all of the activities, although I think Anthony did not try his
best (he kept placing his cards in random spots on his template until I sat with him to keep him
on track even then he was still not as focused as he has been). Tamara put her cards in the
wrong order, but when asked to explain her choices to me, she was able to tell me the correct
order of the activities. She eventually placed them in the correct order. Patrick seemed most
confident with this activity, although he made a few mistakes and had to go back and correct
himself.
All three students got the exit card question (see below) correct which I was impressed with as I
thought Tamara and Anthony may have difficulty. This indicates they are ready to move on.
Name ___________________
Circle the correct timeline.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
19
Daniella Porcaro
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
1. Recognise and be able to communicate the days of the week, and parts of a day (i.e.
morning, afternoon, night) with 100% success.
4. Choose an appropriate activity or action for a particular time of day or day of the week with
100% accuracy when given a selection of picture cards and objects.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Compare and order the duration of events using the everyday language of time
(ACMMG007)
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson students will understand that:
the everyday language of time (e.g. today, morning, night, before, after)
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
20
Daniella Porcaro
Word Wall
Exit Cards
Computer
(https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=yIvQOab00OQ)
LESSON SEQUENCE
TIME
LESSON CONTENT
5 mins
template
Admin
Teacher collects students from
seats.
Doorlag, 2011).
(Teacher directed)
21
Daniella Porcaro
already.
understanding.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
22
Daniella Porcaro
beach).
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
23
Daniella Porcaro
(Student-centred)
The teacher will ask each student to
can write it down (e.g. On Sundays, I visit my book home and explain the concept
grandmothers house. She makes cookies and of weekdays vs weekend to their
reads me stories). The teacher will then
families.
Closure
The teacher will thank the students
questions.
Before they leave, the students will fill 2013). The teacher will read out the
out a short exit card and hand it to the
choice.
ASSESSMENT
Formative Assessment The teacher will collect the weekly timetables created by students to
determine whether or not they were able to correctly identify familiar events that occur on
particular days of the week.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
24
Daniella Porcaro
Formative Assessment The teacher will collect the exit cards at the end of the lesson and use
this to determine whether the students have understood the content well enough to continue
to the next lesson. If they do not all answer the question correctly, there will be another lesson
about days of the week to solidify this learning.
REFLECTION/NOTES
The students worked very well today. They were really engaged when they saw I was going to
start with a picture book particularly Tamara. They are very familiar with the days of the
week song so enjoyed singing along to that too. They also seemed to enjoy the clothes line
activity again.
I did have to speak to Patrick several times about calling out answers straight away, even when
questions were not directed at him. This is preventing the other two students from giving it a
go. He did seem to be trying towards the end of the lesson, however.
The students explained the terms week day and weekend very well during their turn-and-talk
exercise, which is great as this was a concept they all struggled with in the pre-assessment.
The exit cards, and my general observations/notes from the lesson, indicate that they have
understood the content from todays lesson. I will not hesitate to move forward with the
instructional program.
Name ___________________
Monday
Thursday
Tuesday
Friday
Wednesday
Saturday
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
25
Daniella Porcaro
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
2. Describe the duration of a familiar event using at least two time vocabulary words (e.g.
hours, days, weeks, months, long, short, fast, slow, tomorrow, yesterday) with 100%
success.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Compare and order the duration of events using the everyday language of time
(ACMMG007)
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson students will understand that:
the everyday language of time (e.g. today, morning, night, before, after)
describe the duration of familiar situations (e.g. how long until we come to school?)
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
What activities in our daily lives take a really long time? What takes a really short time?
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
26
Daniella Porcaro
Word Wall
Computer
Exit Cards
Work books
Sand timer
Pencils
Battery-operated timer
Whiteboard + markers
Mini whiteboards
LESSON SEQUENCE
TIME
LESSON CONTENT
5 mins
Admin
Teacher collects students from
seats.
Doorlag, 2011).
word wall.
15 mins
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
27
Daniella Porcaro
Learning)
group brainstorm.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
28
Daniella Porcaro
their responses.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
29
Daniella Porcaro
the task.
5 mins
questions.
Before they leave, the students will fill 2013). The teacher will read out the
out a short exit card and hand it to the
choice.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
30
Daniella Porcaro
ASSESSMENT
Formative Assessment The teacher will collect the students work books to assess whether or
not they were able to correctly identify two activities that are either fast or slow.
Formative Assessment The teacher will collect the exit cards at the end of the lesson and use
this to determine whether the students have understood the content well enough to continue
to the next lesson. Unfortunately as there is only one lesson left (that will be taken up largely by
the summative assessment), another lesson on durations will not be possible, but if necessary
the teacher can discuss the need for extra practice with the class teacher.
REFLECTION/NOTES
The students loved the hands-on activities planned for todays lesson. They were very engaged
during the lesson introduction and came up with lots of great ways to informally measure time.
Unfortunately, starting the lesson with this activity meant that they were very excited and
energetic for the rest of the lesson which did not translate well for the book-based activity. They
were restless and unsettled, but with a few reminders they were able to complete the task
successfully.
Tamara needed lots of support during this activity. She struggled with the concept of fast and
slow, and long and short even with her additional scaffolds.
While all three students completed the exit card successfully, I am not 100% confident that they
fully understand the concepts taught today. Unfortunately as there is only one more lesson left
and I need to conduct the summative assessment in that time, I will not be able to provide a
follow up lesson on durations. I will, however, discuss the need for further exploration with
their class teacher.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
31
Daniella Porcaro
Name ___________________
Fast
Slow
One Second
Long
Short
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
32
Daniella Porcaro
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
1. Recognise and be able to communicate the days of the week, and parts of a day (i.e.
morning, afternoon, night) with 100% success.
2. Describe the duration of a familiar event using at least two time vocabulary words (e.g.
hours, days, weeks, months, long, short, fast, slow, tomorrow, yesterday) with 100%
success.
3. Independently sequence a daily timetable in the correct order using picture cards with
100% success.
4. Choose an appropriate activity or action for a particular time of day or day of the week with
100% accuracy when given a selection of picture cards and objects.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Compare and order the duration of events using the everyday language of time
(ACMMG007)
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson students will understand that:
that some activities or events are only appropriate at certain times of the day
the every day language of time (e.g. tomorrow, yesterday, before, after)
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
33
Daniella Porcaro
describe the duration of familiar situations (e.g. how long until we come to school?)
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
Word Wall
Computers x 3
Stickers
Study Ladder
Timer
Pencils
LESSON SEQUENCE
TIME
LESSON CONTENT
5 mins
Admin
Teacher collects students from
seats.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
34
Daniella Porcaro
which helps add to the positive
Doorlag, 2011).
Summative Assessment
(Independent student work)
The summative assessment has been
pace.
noise distractions.
Each student will be given 10 minutes
Closure
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
35
Daniella Porcaro
ASSESSMENT
Summative Assessment A final summative assessment will be conducted in his lesson that
mirrors the pre-assessment given prior to the commencement of the program. This will indicate
whether or not the students have achieved their performance objectives and desired learning
outcomes.
REFLECTION/NOTES
The students worked very well today. The students who were not being tested worked quietly
at their computers (using headphones) so there were minimal distractions for the student who
was being tested.
When tested, all three students seemed to give it their best try. All three students finished the
test within the 10 minute time limit so no extensions were needed.
Overall, I am very pleased with the achievement of all three students. I would have liked just
one more lesson to really work on durations/comparing and describing lengths of time, but
given the 6 week time limit I think the students all achieved a huge amount.
Comparing their final results with their pre-assessment results, it is obvious that they have all
come a long way.
One thing I do question though is whether I pushed Patrick far enough. Perhaps he could have
been extended even further and made even more progress than he did.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
36
Daniella Porcaro
Reference List
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2015). The Australian
Curriculum, v. 7.4. Mathematics Foundation to Year 10. Retrieved from
http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/curriculum/f-10
Briggs, F., & Potter, G. (1999). The early years of school: teaching and learning (3rd ed.) Sydney,
NSW: Pearson.
Lewis, R., & Doorlag, D. (2011). Coordinating the classroom learning environment. In R. Lewis &
D. Doorlag (Eds.), Teaching students with special needs in general education classrooms
(8th ed., pp. 148 161). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Porter, L. (2007). Student behaviour: theory and practice for teachers (3rd ed.). Sydney, NSW:
Allen & Unwin.
Price, K., & Nelson, K. (2011). Planning effective instruction: diversity responsive methods and
management (5th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Tomlinson, C. (2001). Grading for success. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 12-15.
Tomlinson, C. (2003). Teacher response to student needs: rationale to practice. In C. Tomlinson
(Ed.), Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: strategies and tools for
responsive teaching (pp. 36 55). Melbourne, VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education.
Woolfolk, A., & Margetts, K. (2010). Learner differences and learner needs. In A. Woolfolk & K.
Margetts (Eds.), Educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 130 158). Frenchs Forest, NSW:
Pearson.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
37
Daniella Porcaro
APPENDIX C
Final Post-Assessment
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
Assess one student at a time in the Special Education room (the other
students will be working quietly on the computers in the same room).
Explain to the student that you will be asking them some questions about
time. Make it clear that there is no reason to be nervous because it is all
work that they have been doing in class.
Ask the student to put their name and room number on the front page.
Have the student turn the page.
Read the first question out loud.
Give them time to process the question, and then read out each of the
answers provided (giving at least a 2 second pause between each
answer).
Repeat the question again as many times as necessary.
Move on to Question 2 Read the instruction out loud and give them
time to draw their picture. If necessary, ask them to explain the drawing
and caption it for them.
Move on to Question 3 Read the instruction out loud (Point to the
activities in the order that you do them during the school day)
Point to each picture and state what it illustrated. Repeat this twice.
Allow the child enough time to process this instruction and make their
decisions.
Number the images from 1 5 in the order that the student pointed (in
the boxes provided).
Administer the remainder of the test using the same procedure described
for Question 1 (e.g. read the question, allow time for processing, read the
answers, repeat the question if necessary, allow the student enough time
to complete)
Once finished, congratulate the students on a job well done!
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
All
About
Time!
Name: ______________
Room: ______________
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
2. Draw a picture of
something you do on a
Sunday:
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
Relaxation
Arrive at
school
Leave
school
Story time
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
4.
Which of these is the
shortest? Circle your
answer.
1 second
1 hour
1 minute
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
1 week
1 month
Daniella Porcaro
Have dinner
Go to sleep
Get dressed
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
Arrive at school
Have lunch
Sleep
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
Daniella Porcaro
7. What do you do at
night?
Circle your
answer.
Arrive at school
Have breakfast
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
10
Daniella Porcaro
Student 1 Anthony
*I apologise for the low quality
images my scanner is broken
at the moment so I had to rely
on taking photos. If it is too
hard to read please let me
know and I will try to find
another way to upload the
assessments.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
11
Daniella Porcaro
Student 2 Patrick
*I apologise for the low quality
images my scanner is broken
at the moment so I had to rely
on taking photos. If it is too
hard to read please let me
know and I will try to find
another way to upload the
assessments.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
12
Daniella Porcaro
Student 3 Tamara
*I apologise for the low quality
images my scanner is broken
at the moment so I had to rely
on taking photos. If it is too
hard to read please let me
know and I will try to find
another way to upload the
assessments.
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
13
Daniella Porcaro
Total
Score
11/12
(91.6%)
12/12
(100%)
10/12
(83.3%)
Q1
Q3
Q4a Q4b
Q5
Q6
Q7
EDUC4731: Assignment 2
14