FROM: BERYL NT HC PHONE NOL = Mar. 21 Zona @9:53e PL UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE March 11, 2004 David R. Amos P.O. Box 2 South Acworth, New Hampshire 03607 Re: Your letter ‘Dear Mr. Amos ‘Thank you for your letter dated January 25, 2004 and the documents that you ‘enclosed with it, I regret the delay in acknowledging their receipt. I will look forward to reviewing the documents in closer detail as time and my other duties here at Justiceworks permit. Justiceworks is a research and development institute in justice studies at the University of New Hampshire. Although Justiceworks focuses on issues of crime, safety, ‘security, and the administration of justice, it cannot provide legal advice or advocacy to private individuals Unfortunately, therefore, I cannot promise to provide ‘any advice or legal services to you. You may wish to seek out and consult private legal counsel regarding the concerns that prompted you to contact Justiceworks. We greatly appreciate your interest in our work. ~~ Associate Research Professor oan Jssiceworks Hiuddescon Hall 75 Main Steet Dushem, New Hampthire 03824-3532 60882-4957 09-86-7040 aaCharles T Putnam and Michael K Skibbie, January 25, 2004 UNH Justiceworks Huddleston Hall Room 208 73 Main Street Durham, NH 03824-3532 RE: Corruption Sirs, T have already contacted Joe Pace of your of fice by phone and email. I now support it with this correspondence to you two fellas. You, as respected lawyer's employed by UNH Justiceworks should readily understand my allegations within the enclosed documents etc, Please find enclosed a copy of a letter with all of its enclosures received last month by the Taxpayers Against Fraud organization, T have included some documents received by Attorney Generals Peter Heed and Eliot Spitzer and some copies of documents filed in the U.S. District Court that have since disappeared from the public record. For your review I have included some documents that relate to my doings with the FBI, IRS, SEC, DHS, Martha Stewart, Putnam Investments and politicians. There are many more issues as well. T could only serve the copy of wiretap tape numbered [39 upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. As you know if I hed served it upon a layman such as your Director, Mr. Kirkpatrick, I would be guilty of violating the civil rights of the people recorded on it. Please feel free to impress me with ethical professional conduct Please to do not pretend that this correspondence is unsolicited. Byway of the UNH Media and UNH Faculty Experts on the NH Presidential Primary, my comments are invited Although I am not certain that the Patriot Act allows for Free Speech, trust that I will speak my mind anyway. The Justiceworks is listed as part of the experts on Presidential Primary at UNH. There is no way for such self proclaimed experts can be true to their word without being readily available to be completely informed of all related matters, It is not ethical to choose what you wish to be ignorant of. Only I can inform you of this. I fit within the definition of “others” in the following paragraphs that describe your mission “Based at the UNH Institute for Policy and Social Science Research, Justiceworks combines the expertise of university professors, researchers, police, judges, corrections officials and others throughout the region to serve a three-part mission: Provide timely and affordable evaluations of state and local, programs aimed at minimizing crime and delinquency; Provide useful and current information about crime and crime control strategies to planners, policy makers and those with an interest in the field of criminal justice: Develop and provide new training opportunities in criminal justice to various audiences within the regional justice system, including victim advocates, school resource officers, and defense and prosecuting attorneys. ~ aie ha) be we David R. Amos PO Box 2 South Acworth NH 03607CHARLES F. BASS ERGY ano comence Comma 242) aayeUAN BUILDING WASHINGTON, Bc 20515-2802 emai hnsmetese 957 Congress of the Anited States - eR mie ve papa: eenouse goa House of Representatives i icuiateey th lee December 24, 2003 Mr. David Amos P.O. Box 2 South Aeworth, NH 03607 Dear Mr. Amos: Your correspondence addressed t0 Congressman Robert B. Aderholt of Alabama has been forwarded to me and I have reviewed the documents you sent. Unfortunately, the issues you raise are not under the jurisdiction of my federal office nor even the jurisdiction of the State of New Hampshire, Your concems appear to result from a matter handled in a Probate Court in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the appropriate body to review your concerns is the Massachusetts Bar Association. Contact information is as follows: Massachusetts Bar Association Board of Bar Overseers 75 Federal Street Boston, MA 02110 (617) 338-0500 [hope this information is helpful to you. Qube O Ones Charles F. Bass. ‘Member of Congress CFBAplSeea a eeat Congress of the United States Geeta pene nee Gane House of Representatives esomtonasre so eon Washington, AC 20515-2109 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM ASSISTANT DEMOCRATIC WHIF December 23, 2003 Mr, David R. Amos P.O, Box 2 South Acworth, NH 03607 Dear Mr. Amos: 519 Cumon HoueeOrree Busono ‘Wresnsrow 06 20st 202 ais-e279 20 3886 Fa, Doeren wa 02210 Soasubnsss sre oon sui Thank you for contacting me regarding the concerns you have with the Federal Government, Please be advised that I passed your concems onto the House Committee on Government Reform. As you referenced in your miost recent letter, you are no longer a resident of the Massachusetts 9” Congressional District as you are currently residing in New Hampshire. For your information, you are currently represented by Co1 ‘Thank you again for contacting me on this issue ENF. CYNGR Congressman - 9" District Massachusetts ressman Charlie Bass,Sent by U.S. Mail and Fax November 23° 2003 ‘Senator Norm Coleman Senator Thad Cochran 320 Hart Senate Office Building 113 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-2303 Washington, D.C. 20510-2402 Senator Trent Lott Senator Christopher Bond 487 Russell Senate Office Building 274 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-2403 Washington, D.C. 20510-2503 Senator Jim Talent Senator Judd Gregg 493 Russell Senate Office Building 393 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-2505, Washington, 0.C. 20510-2904 Re: Corruption Sirs, Welcome to my “Unholy War of Words” with the "Brotherhood of the Bar”. Nobody should ever say that I mushroomed you lawyer/politicians. T have no doubt you have heard my name a time or two in the past few days. Now I merely prove ‘that you are well aware of my concerns as of this date. You really should look into my matters and consider conducting yourselves Professionally according to the rules that all lawyers must obey. You should also act Ethically as politicians according to Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached for your review. In fact I demand that you do or I will be do to sue you too. If you wish to know what will be arriving at your office by snail mail simply pick up the phone and call the U. S Attorney that acts on behalf of the USA in the District you represent. You will be receiving exactly the same material that they have had the opportunity to review for almost two months. I do expect that you will stand with Mr. Bush against me. T listened to some of Senator Tom Harkin's statements yesterday and acquired ‘a respect for him as a man who honors his father. Mr. Harkin proved to me that he understands the need to care for the needs and pride of others less fortunate than us. Similar to Mr. Harkin, my father also pulled himself up from a poor start in life, He also joined the Air Force and after he was the sole survivor of a plane crash, he too received his education from a Catholic University. He definitely much appreciated their assistance, as do I. However that does not excuse a Catholic lawyer from stealing funds from my Clan's interests and giving it to his Church.Nor does it give a Catholic U.S. Attorney the right to remove Cardinal Law's name from my complaint. Nor does it give every lawyer attempting to litigate the matter any right to ignore the law and all the rules. Whereas I do have respect for Mr. Harkin because of his statements yesterday, I have included a letter sent a while ago to the acting Dean of the Catholic University Law School. It should enlighten ‘Mr. Harkin as to why T can not afford to trust him because he is a lawyer and a politician, although T sincerely wish that were otherwise. He may feel free to make. me change my mind. He may share the letter with anyone he wishes. It is filed in ‘the website mentioned in the enclosed letter for public view. Many politicians at the federal level have made well aware of these matters for quite some time and have chosen to ignore me. Now I will ignore them. I will be watching and listening. ‘The reason for the SEC to quickly settle with Putnam Investments is simply to protect wealthy crooks, ‘The scandal within the Brookline Savings Bank of which Putnam Investments was the largest shareholder is far more interesting and serious than market timing. Look how much Mr. Chapman made off of his shares after T had mode him undeniably aware of my concerns. Then lets talk about a malicious profit made by an untrustworthy dude and the federal cover-up. Many States had their retirement funds in Putnam and profited at my Clan's expense. Nobody has even attempted to try to explain the Bank Account that remained opened for years after everybody knew Aunt Elaine had died. The recent events during the course of the past week should only further serve to place more black marks in historical record of the 108" Congress. The War for ‘Tragi Freedom is the worst of all. That is because some many decent people died not to free the Iraqi people but to aid Mr. Bush in his attempt to bring about New World Order. The cover up of the SEC matter and the sneaky fast moves relating to the Energy Bill and the Medicare matter are absolutely shameful but they only involve money. The War is beyond obscene and waged in the name of Freedom. I sincerely hope that a great scandal falls upon all who stand with Mr. Bush and all his greedy friends. May I suggest that you all start upholding the Constitution that ‘you swore you would. Torture is never OK. Mr. Dershowitz and I are from different planets. Watch me bring him to my world to argue human rights and civil rights. It is absolutely ridiculous that the Justice System has forced me to give the evidence of their incompetence and malice to the mob. They cannot stop me now. T have already insured that it will be done no matter what happens to me. As I told the Secret Service Agents acting on False Allegations made against me, the DHS can now do with me what they wish. They will only succeed making another martyr for freedom. If you don't believe me, call them. Why not ask the Executive Office of the U.S. Attorneys why they sent me another man's private papers?Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29". I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have. caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as +o whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. ‘The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. At the very least I have now made you a witness to my pursuit of Justice. Tam making my best effort to make certain that Mr. Bush is long remembered by future generations as a WarMonger and a puppet for the porky pigs of the Big Bad Bankers and their Buddies in Big Business. Thus far you are all just mentioned as players on his world stage. You pick the part you wish play in my book. Heroes are always nice but it is the wickedness of the well-known villains that promote the sale of the book. If you doubt me, then explain to me the success of such rags as the National Enquirer. Then perhaps you should check my work stored at the following address: http:// briefcase yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186. There is no middle ground for you to stand on. Either you are with me or against me in my battle with corruption. I am suing him as an individual in a federal court. The appropriate six month wait and three days for the mail has now past without an answer from him or his lawyer, Mr. Gonzales. Q 2 Lin (ue Cya'll in Court@ u/ (ete David R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. 02186ETHICS MANUAL CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE Resolved by the House of Representatives {the Senate concurring}, That it is the sense of the Congress that the following Code of Ethics should be adhered to by all Government employees, including officeholders: CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE Any person in Government service should: 1. Put loyalty to the highest moral principals and to country above loyalty to Government persons, party, or department, 2. Uphold the Constitution, laws, and legal regulations of the United States and of all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion. 2. Give a full day's labor for a full day's pay; giving to the performance of his duties his earnest effort and best thought. 4, Seek to find and employ more efficient and economical ways of getting tasks accomplished. ‘5. Never discriminate unfairly by the dispensing of special favors or privileges to anyone, ‘whether for remuneration or not; and never accept for himself or his family, favors or benefits under circumstances which might be construed by reasonable persons as influencing the performance of his governmental duties. ing upon the duties of office, since a Government ding on public duty 6. Make no private promises of any kind bi ‘employee has no private word which can be 7. Engage in no business with the Government, either directly or indirectly which is inconsistent with the conscientious performance of his governmental duties ‘8. Never use any information coming to him confidentially in the performance of governmental duties as a means for making private profit. 9. Expose corruption wherever discovered 10. Uphold these principles, ever conscious that public office is a public trust (Passed July 11, 1958.)US. Postal Service" Delivery Confirmation Receipt | Peston nl Dar Coton ts ut be od foe aig {Ete Srt Cob eee ym) - Sgonver N&M CoLcerH @ S26 Whar Seware ee 3? WASH INS TON: De 20gh-2: 5 33 POSTAL CUSTOMER is i Key sen For nes § enna cosa tse eb ie 80 smows.con® an sf real 800-222-1811 ac ‘OHEGK ONE POSTALUSE OMY) 3 ee Baerorty wall" Sorvicw 5 (Ce cass ta pecet {Clrsctage Serves parcel orm 5, ay 208 ‘eae ravensUSS. Postal Service" Delivery Confirmatior Receipt {Pest and oetvry Coatatn fees must be pid belr maig. ; id nob ena sen St aa Oop GRebé Rossen. Sensre Cera, Bee WDE aes apy POSTAL CUSTOMER: Keep tie eat Fr ries: Aas are et teat se uspscam® real 00-20-1611 eon OeTAL USE BH rority Mail"Service (Priest cia tai parca CPackage Services parcet Fo te 2 eaten LIVERY CoNMANTON HUMBER nape 1790 0003 bous 4!-o. rostal Servicé Delivery Contirmatior’ Receipt DR.NERY CONRRWATION MUMGER- a302 1790 a0 on uz’ Poot at sie Catan fs spb oi Pare aaa EARS HER Hoag : ST y Rosse ene Onra bug WASH IO Te. R50 ASee POSTAL CUSTOMER: oc thse For Ingues eat ovens terete ot at . decal 0002-891 cH oe Post OMY RG iotyttaitsonvico Critst.ciass Mai? percet Clpackage Sorvices parcel Fo 2 gota eeUS. Postal Service’ Delivery Confirmation’ Receipt {© Pastage and Doar onan tes mst be pal oe maine Fy fr Sn eto ua mag § Senate Jim Wtesr . 22 tC, Queen Deva Ay Ruy B 2 vonorinay tts a CAS ge Ee POSTAL CUSTOMER: 8 ep seco Fr egies 5 ee fess even ae wannusps.com® gE area tan0-222-1811 ae z cacoK Ne POSTAL USEOML) B Bier wa seven ie (Cihrst- clase mal? parcet ClPeckage Services parcel er 12.202 cesta“-S. Postal ServiceDelivery Confirmatiori‘ Receipt in Oar Catron os must pal ae en, ‘rele Sent To: tobe compe by ten, ore eu Senn CF sig raqns DE Qesy 2uyee 7 Posrat cusTOMER: Sia haere aus am uspcom® or ca 800-222-1014 hEcK One poste. Use ony ort Mall"Sorvice [rirstciass tai perce! Imackage Series parcel (Gee Rose ‘ELEY CONFIRMATION manER: 302 1790 goO1 QO4s 4382 2 i a f 5 g US. Postal Service" Delivery Confirmation Receipt 2 Postage and Deivery Contmation fs must bo pid before mang. ati et: te colts Th Ses awe Aa OCHeANS fs erst PIGKSers eras CrFady 7 Wwastiwgen DC ats /o-R4o2y : 3 Y POSTAL CUSTOMER: Le Peter Lie ee ‘Access inary eo Seah bys. See S : Priority Mail" Service g et tse paca z Cmte Seren pace! seo ana (Pontogy HEWLETT" fe Page 1 (ey pacxann ‘YP OfficeJet K Series | Monday, November 24, 2003 3:30:34 AM Sent Date ‘Duration Name < “Fax Number ~~SSPages Status 1172403328 AM 2:08 f° 12022244952 \B\” Completed 1172403328 AM 0:00 {12022248149 BY) Error: No-answor 112403323AM 2:10 {| 12022242262 Completed 1172403321 AM 2:09 i[\ 12022249450 78! Completed 1172403 3:14 AM 0:00 1A 1.202 228.0604" ror: No answer 1172403 3:04 AM 0:00 SEES” 8 roc No ener 1172403 2:58 AM 4:38 02724-3808 ©=— 8) Completed 11/2403 2:56 AM 0:00 42022281229 = 9 Error: No anower 1172403 255 AM 0:00 1202 224.3753 9 Error: No answer 1172403 2:41 AM 0:00 1.202 224-5432 10 Efror: No answer 1172403230 AM 2:14 1 202 225-3073 10 Completed : 0:00 1 202 224-6295 10 Error: No answer 0:00 1 202 228-2656 40 —_Efror: No answer 0:00 4202 224.0776 10 Error: No answer 2 9:00 1202 228-3398 10 Error: No answer 1172403201 AM 1:02 1202 224-2541 8 Canceled 11/2403 1:58 AM 2.04 1.202 224-5301 Completed 11/2403 153 AM 2.04 4.202 224-2207 Completed 11/2403 1:50 AM 2:02 41.202 228-1265 Complotod 11724003 238 1 202 224-0103 Completed 1172403 1:44 AM 2:03, 1.202 224-3149 Completed 1172403 1:40 AM 0:00 1 202 228-2577 Enor: Busy 11724003 1:14 AM 0:00 4 202 224-8369 Error: No answer 11/2403 1:10AM 0:00 1 202 228-0400 Error: No answer 1112403 1:07 AM 2:04 4202 224-4700 Completed 11/2403 1:01 AM 2.04 4.202 228-0012 Com 11/2403 12:59AM 0:00 4 202 228-0400 Error: No answer 11/24/03 12:58 AM. 0:00 11/2403 12:52AM 0:01 11/2403 12:52AM 0:02 11/2403 12:52AM 0:02 11/2403 1252 AM 0:05 1172403 1250 AM 1:37 11/2403 12:48 AM 2:02 11/2403 12:33 AM 0:40 11/2403 1227 AM 0:30 11/2403 1220 AM 0:00 1172403 12:19AM 0:00 1172403 1216 AM 1:41 11724103 12:05 AM 1:52 1172403 1203 AM 1:52 11/2403 12:00AM 1:51 1972303 11:58 PM 1:52 19/2303 11:47 PM 2:13 11/2303 11:44PM 2:12 19/2303 11:42 PM. 0:00 1972303 11:40 PM 225, 19/2303 11:37 PM 2:12 11/2303 11:34PM 2:38 1172303 11:13 PM. 0:00 11/2393 10:52PM 0:00 1 202 224-9369 1202 224-7327 1202 228.0012 1202 224-4700 4202 228-2577 1202 224.9369 4202 228-0400 4202 224-1388 1.202 224-1388 1202 224-2725 4 202 225-2154 1 202 224-2354 1202 228-0002 4.202 228-5765 1.202 224-4293 1.202 228-2717 1202 225-3002 1202 224-0139 1.202 224-2353 1202 225-8757 1.202 224-6747 1202 228-2183 1202 226-7290 4.202 225-3196 4202 225-5879 1202 226-7290 MANN ove meee aeaannmaae Bsssss Error: No answer Error: Communication Error: Communication Error: Communication Error: Communication Error: Communication Error: Communication Canceled Cancaled Error: No answer Error: No anewor ‘Completed ‘Completed Error: No answer Error: No answer (continued next page)Senator John Sununu November 20, 2003 111 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-2903 Re: Corruption. Sir, Senator John Sununu here is your chance to walk the walk about the Energy Bill that went ing through the Evil 108"* Congress. You talked the talk about a flagrant example of political pork in the new Energy Bill. Feel free to be the first politician in the 108" to act ethically and in the best interests of the USA. Please be my Hero. Pick up the ball that Mr. Markey dropped and make your touchdown in the Senate a Memorable and Honorable act. This is no joke. Today is the day that I have every right to sue many low men in high places as individuals. I you doubt me, give the Assistant U. S. Attorney, Don Feith, a call. He should tell you that T am os serious as a heart attack. After your review of the enclosed documents I demand that you obey Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached or T will sue you too. Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on ‘September 29". I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. I cannot send you a copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 because you are not a member of the bar or a law enforcement officer. However you do hold the Public Trust. Prove to me that you deserve it. Perhaps you should call Bill and Jeane Shaheen in New Hampshire and ask them what they know about the matter. Better yet give the Attorney General Mr. Heed a call. None of them will talk to me so I must sue them to get an answer. Trust me, I will. At the very least, I will be calling you as a witness to testify te what you now know to be true. To aid you in your task, I have included a letter sent to Chief Counsel Doug Nappi of the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. He has some documents that he should share with you. While many Senators etc are spitting and chewing about jurisdictions and venues, Iam making my concerns known everywhere. Every U.S. Disrict Court in the nation will soon have. jurisdiction and venue to hear my matters. Have your lawyer check my work. Tf he disagrees, dare him to send me a letter. ht OA Jer Cya'll in Court yy v David R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. 02186U.S. Postal Service’ Delivery Confirmation Receipt 2 sae nd ley ontenaton os sepa ea ei ST to egiey maeh S Eater John Fea une TTT" Ruts icll Simatic o€ Whe Wi shrwyten OC Legst0-2%6; POSTAL CUSTOMER: agp is og For nguies: ate ‘Access internet web sits at _ wan usps.com > creak 13002204011 ees ryt seven (Cire cass tai? parost ‘(package Services parca! Fox 1, hy 208 (Bee Rover} DELWERY CONFIRMATION NUE: 0303 1290 O000 alz) 354HP OfficeJet K Series K60 Log for Personal Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner papa 617 698 6549 Nov 20 2003 1:30pm Last Transaction Date Time ‘Type Identification Duration Pages Result Nov 20 1:24pm Fax Sent 12022284131 5:37 17 OKOctober 6, 2003 Jeffrey A Denner William €. Christie Denner Associates P.C. Shaheen & Gordon Four Longfellow Place P.O. Box 2703 Suite 3501-06 Two Capital Plaza, Suite 4 Boston MA 02114 Concord, NH 03302-2703 Phone (617) 227-2800 Phone (603) 225-7262 RE: My call to Mr. Christie this morning, Please call me. I may give you some tapes Sirs, First I must say I bear you fellas no malice. For obvious reasons I can't trust anyone and lawyers in particular. But I did read your complaint on behalf of the John L. McIntyre Estate and therefore take my hat off to anyone willing to sue the FEDS. I never prejudge anyone but will quickly assess anyone byway of their eyes, words, body movement and past actions. Thus far you are dark horses to me except for your past litigation. Rest assured I will study them if you ignore this letter. I know that I am the same to you so check me work. I gave Mr. Christie the web address. In order to give you a heads up on what is about to hit the fan, Please find enclosed: 1. A copy of a letter sent to all US Attorneys. Please notice that I sent this letter before the Circus in Norfolk Superior Court. The outcome has no relevance to my next complaint in federal court and yet that complaint will have a reverse effect. Be careful what you do with the copy of the wiretap tape. It is served upon you in confidence as an Officer of the Court in order that it is investigated. 2. Copies of some recent letters to and from me that you may find interesting. Please do not misunderstand me I am not a lawyer, just a pigheaded layman who will not back down from anyone. The minute I can find a trustworthy lawyer, I am more than willing to pass the torch and go back to being me. Any lawyer should find me a lucrative and informed client or a fairly formidable foe. Please check my work and let me know soon if you understand my allegations under the First, Fourth and Seventh Amendments and Titles 42, 26 and 18 and the Local rules of the US District Courts of NH and MA a ‘) don kK Arn David R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. 02186 617 240-6698US. Postal Service’ Delivery Confirmatiori"Receipt Postage en Dever Canimaton tes mst bell bee ting SECC SnD univer Htew ste low Place Surtc 350i 0 Poster MA ORE POSTAL CUSTOMER: Xeap tis cop Fr bate: Poca ‘Acczsinrt we haa wawuspacon® orca Pace 222.61 emg oe rosTaLUSeont EFPronty iti” serice (lrrstclase Mai? porcot ‘(Apackage Services parcel Ps Fon 182, may 2002 (See teers) Dee CONRAN MIMBER, 0303 1910 oo00 e972 1718U.S. Postal Service" Delivery Confirmation Receipt sn. Posige and DoluaryConfrmaton foe mtb ai bee mailing. SO ee or st 1c roman PO ox 2703 Cop coud MH 0F402- 23 POSTAL CUSTOMER: eptisenbt Peo: es Sciacca ‘rma rea oe cicero roa zeny (Crrority wail”service (Crirst-ciass mai? parcel package Services parcat sia ooo e372 ELEY CONFIRMATION MUKER 0303 2430 a i iJudy Reardon legal counsel for Yelena Boxer legal counsel for John Kerry for President, Inc. Kucinich for President Committee 195 McGregor St., Center Entrance 11808 Lorain Ave. 1st floor. Manchester, NH Cleveland, OH 44111 Phone 603-622-9100 Phone 216 889-2004 Fax 603-622-9110 Fax 216 251-5974 Hey Ladies, Please find enclosed a copy of a letter sent to every US Attorney in the USA over a month ago. Your candidates for the Presidency can never say that that T did not make them well aware of me. May T suggest that you sit down with them and have a long talk with them about the attached Code of Ethics, then write back to me with your opinions about the allegations I made to every damned US Attorney. I need a good laugh. Here is ¢ lawyer joke of my creation for you two to enjoy. If you understand the joke, if you are skillful lawyers, and if your candidates are competent politicians you may be able to upset the Bush Crowd of Crackers. However many Yankee solicitors should tell you that you can't fool me because I am too stupid. (A Maritime joke we also refer to lawyers, politicians and bankers as smiling bastards) Plus you have the added dilemma of not being able to talk to a fool that just struck himself dumb. You must talk to people that you know you can't trust because an honest man does not trust you. It is an interesting barrel of pickles for any lawyer to contemplate, even if only a layman says so. If it were not, the jig would have been up a long time ago for Charles J. Kickham Jr. The simple problem that started this circus was the fact that my wife holds half interest in an estate that was closed without her assent. In the unrelated matter only Ted Kennedy, Don Feith and Tim Cruz denied that the tapes are real. All others ignored me. Here's me joke: What did Michael Shaheen tell his buddy H. Marshall Jarrett as he left his office to assist William H, Webster in putting a lid on many a can of worms? Play dumb til I get back will ya. Good luck trying to settle with me if you do not obey the Rules of Professional Conduct. The copy of the wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. If you doubt me Ms. Boxer should talk to the FBI in Ohio and Ms Reardon should give Peter Heed a call. Even would be interested in what they have to say. I would be so pleased if you were the first lawyers to display ethical behavior but disappointed by the fact that I had to put you over a barrel first. John Kerry, Dennis Kunicich, John Edwards and Bill Shaheen have already fallen into the barre! on their own accord. I swear I didn't even push. Cya'll in Court® Rak idpow— 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. 02186 Dated October 31, 2003US. Postal Service’ Delivery Confirmation’ Receipt ostge an Dever Contumston fees mst bell betes meng Att Te becomes) Judy Rinse dose “TAS Me Guage St Wiaw caastie tt O3/a]} POSTAL CUSTOMER: : opts eos For ngs: Postar ‘Accs inert a te a sewnuspacom® rca 900 222-1811 4 ON (OETAL EON [Sp Ficrty sai"Servies ret cies Mo peel Clractage Senos parcel erm 16, a0 Senn) sea” conemmenoN nomen 9303 1930 0000 aN72 2470U.S. Postal Service’ Delivery Confirmation’ Receipt ‘Postage ant Devry Cnfmatn fos muse pai oie mag. SA Sot T: to be completed hy maior) & Vicliies Boxee Lk: TPG 06 Cova vw 1st Chom Bu Clewilawd Oro ¥¥I/ zs POSTAL CUSTOMER: a ee 8 ‘imcmpacon €3 wen eer aA eax one osraL USE ONLY) 3 forty Mail"Sorvice. g Clrttciss ha pret )Package Services parcal orm 82a 30 (see RoverAttention Timothy Cruz, May 20, 2003 Plymouth County District Attorney, 32 Belmont Street Brockton, Massachusetts 02301 Phone (508) 584-8120 Fax (508) 586-3578 Sir, You have been made well aware of many crimes practiced against my family within Plymouth County. On April 1 T served in hand much evidence that warranted an investigation. After my calls to your office today I am prompted to serve this letter in hand with a witness. You can never say that you did not know. Please find enclosed various documents that were filed in Federal Court and in Plymouth District Court and Plymouth Probate Court since my serving you on April 17 . I see no need to explain. The documents are irrefutable. They readily display the crimes and were filed by lawyers not me. I now ask you a few questions. 1. Do you agree with the lawyer Michael Pieroni and maintain that is my wife's signature and not a forgery? Please view my wife's Affidavit. 2. Do you see fraud practiced against the court and us by the Plymouth Register's Office? How would you explain the Small Claims Clerk knowing of a remand from Federal Court two days before a Judge signed the Court Order? 3. Why did you not inquire about the possible Fourth Amendment Violations on the tape recording I provided you? 4. Within my Affidavits do you see new Civil Rights Violations that were practiced by the Kickhams and many members of the bar after I had received Judgments against some of them? Does this not warrant new complaints seeking even more relief? Is it your policy to refrain from prosecuting members of the bar? 5. Do you understand that Tax Fraud is under Federal Jurisdiction. Where the fraud is usually practiced within a State but it is always a Federal Issue. When your predecessor, Michael J. Sullivan removed the Civil Rights Complaint from State Court and argued Tax Fraud ex parte he proved my next complaint for me. He should have attempted to argue Civil Rights but the Violations were undeniable. How well do you think I understand M.G.L. Ch. 258: Sec 10. and Ch 272 Sec 99 (c)(2) or U.S.C. Title 42 and Title 18? Is that the reason you don't call or write? 6. Will I be seeing you in Court tomorrow? If not I will see Cyd avid R. Amo: 153 Alvin Ave. Milton , MA. 02186CommonweaLtH OF MassacHuseTts PLYMOUTH DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY 92 BELMONT STREET P.0, BOX 1665, BROCKTON, MA 02303-1665 TIMOTHY J. CRUZ Tex: (608) 584-8120, istrict arTonKeY Fax: (608) 586-9578 May 22, 2003 David R. Amos 153 Alvin Avenue Milton, MA 02186 Dear Mr. Amos: This office is in receipt of the information you left here dated May 30, 2003. On review of this information, we detect no grounds to initiate a criminal proceeding. This case is a civil matter in which this office has no standing. ‘Thank you for your attention. Very truly yours, fo Lf Foy ff bof MEL. oA # MICHAEL H. O'CONNELL Assistant District Attorney Plymouth District MHOzmes o113W Qreomvse omarServed in hand to the Office of May 12, 2003 Don Feith May 12, 2003 AL FILED ON Assistant U.S. Attorney, ORIGIN 55 Pleasant Street, MAY 12 2003 Concord, NH 03301 gs. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NH Re: Your investigation Sir, On March 31, 2003 T served on you in person a great number of documents and three tapes that warranted a criminal investigation by the Office of the U.S. Attorney. You and I spoke only briefly and not in private ‘at your convenience. I openly answered your every question and of fered you ‘as much explanation as you were willing to hear. The next day the Secret Service woke me up with many questions to ask to aid their investigation of me because false allegations had been made against me. That has been resolved. I know you should be aware of this because I told them of you and all Federal Computers are linked. You and they should have been aware of the Treasury and the INS Depts. investigations of me as well. At the time of our meeting I did sense your disdain for me which is OK by me. You have that right, but you still must listen to me and investigate my allegations and examine my evidence. When you asked where to send back the stuff, I found it comical that I would have to explain to you why you should not. After all, you are a Government Lawyer and I just an alien layman. You did ask for one month before responding to me. I have extended the courtesy two more weeks, Now that I am aware of Judge DiClerico’s Orders, I must go above your head and on to Washington. Perhaps you should review my recent filings hereto attached to aid in your understanding. Please keep the Tapes in your possession. I believe the Office of the Independent Counsel should be requesting them from you shortly. I will bother you no more with any more evidence of crimes I will take it elsewhere. But I do demand an answer from you to this Question. Inall of the evidence that I have provided to you, do you see any Civil Rights Violations and Professional Misconduct? I expect a response in writing and signed in your hand. I will file the documents I gave you in the matter now before Judge McAuliffe when Cput | with them, vid R> Amos 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. 02186U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of New Hampshire Foderat Buldine 603225.1832 155 Pleasani Sire, Rom 352 Concord, Now Hampshire 03301 May 12, 2003 Mr. David Amos 153 Alvin Avenue Milton, MA 02186 Re: Return of Materials Dear Mr. Amos: I am returning the materials you left with this office. All of the allegations you make arise from a probate dispute in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. There is nothing in the documents you left that would provide the basis for jurisdiction in the State of New Hampshire. Accordingly, the materials are being returned to you. Attorneys in this office are prohibited from providing private legal advice to citizens. You should contact a private attorney for a legal opinion on your questions concerning professional misconduct and civil rights violations Very truly yours, THOMAS P. COLANTUONO United States Attorney yp, De VEE Donald Feith Assistant U.S. Attorney DE/at EnclosureHar 13 3 sa PH "03 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE James McLaughlin, Trustee of ‘the Elaine Kickham Trust, Plaintiff v 1 No. 03-203-M Opinion No. 2003 DNH 076 Francis Kickham, Jean F. O'N Barbara J. Kickham, and Willi ickham, Defendants ORDER This litigation appears to arise from a dispute concerning the administration of the Elaine Kickham Trust. On May 8, 2003, David R. Amos, pro se, removed the matter from the Trial Court, Probate and Family Court Department, Norfolk County, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Amos is not, however, a party to the underlying litigation, nor does it appear that he is a named beneficiary of the Elaine Kickham Trust, nor is he authorized to represent any of the interests of the named beneficiaries. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654. See also Herrera-Venegas v. Sanchez-Rivera, 681 F.2d 41, 42 (1st Cir. 1982) (“The federal courts have consistently rejected attempts at third-party representation. By law an individual may appear in federal courts only pro se orthrough legal counsel.”); Local Rule 83.2(d) (‘Persons who are not members of the bar of this court and to whom [certain exceptions] are not applicable will be allowed to appear before s court only on their own behalf.”) (emphasis supplied). Previous efforts by Amos to remove similar matters pending in the Massachusetts state courts have met with dismissal orders from this court. See, e.a., Q/Meara v. O’Meara, No. 03-168-JD (D.N.H. May 6, 2003); Rooney v. 0/Meara, No. 03-197-JD (D.N.H May 8, 2003). This effort fares no better though Amos invokes numerous statutes in support of removal, it is principally governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1441, which provides: Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) (emphasis supplied). See also 28 U.S.C.§ 1446 (discussing the procedure for removing a case to federal court). Among other defects associated with the notice of removal, it does not appear to have been timely filed, since the underlying state court action appears to have been pending since at least 2002. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446 (establishing a thirty day period during which cases must be removed). Nor was this action removed by a proper party; although Amos claims to be a “party in interest” in the underlying litigation (his wife is apparently 4 beneficiary of the trust), he is not a defendant. Accordingly, he cannot remove the proceeding to federal court. See 26 U.S.C § 1441 (a).? Nor would removal to this district be appropriate in any event, as it is not “the district court of the United States for } That Amos is purporting to act under a power of attorney executed by his wife (a defendant in the underlying state court action) does not alter the fact that he is not authorized to act as her legal counsel in federal court. While a non-lawyer is certainly entitled to represent himself in fede: proceedings, he may not, without engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, represent the interests of a third party, even if that third party has vested him with power of attorney. See e.0., Pinkney v. Dept. of Housing « Econ, Dev't., 42 Fed. Appx 535, 536, 2002 WL 1809534 (3rd Cir. July 9, 2002) 3the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). And, even if Amos were a named defendant and if this were the appropriate forum to which the case might properly be removed, the other defendants have not assented to removal. See, e.g., Hill v. Phillips, Barratt. Kaiser Eng'g. Ltd., 586 F. Supp. 944, 945 (D.Me. 1984) (Cyr, J (“where there are multiple defendants, all must consent to or join in the petition for removal.”) (citations omitted). See Karpowicz v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mass. Inc., 72 Fair Emp. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 350, 1996 WL 528372 (D. Mass. 1996 (holding that the “removal of this case was invalid and remand is required” since fewer than all defendants assented to removal in a timely manner). But, perhaps most fundamentally, the notice of removal fa: to allege sufficient facts to warrant the conclusion that this court may properly exercise subject matter jurisdiction over the claims advanced in the underlying litigation. First, the parties all appear to be residents of Massachusetts. Amos has not alleged otherwise. Consequently, diversity is lacking. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Nor does the underlying litigation appear toinvolve any claims “arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 1331. As a result, the court lacks both diversity and federal question jurisdiction - a defect which, unlike some of the others associated with the notice of removal, may not be waived by the parties. Conclusion Because this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction as to the removed matter, the action must be remanded to the court from which it was removed. The Clerk of Court shall forthwith remand the action to the Trial Court, Probate and Family Court Department, Norfolk County, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and close the case. SO ORDERED. telah -—— even af Mchulifte nited States District Judge May 13, 2003 cc: James A. McLaughlin, Ssq. David R. Amos Jean F, O’Meara Tammy L. Richardson, Esq. Barbara J. KickhamUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 55 PLEASANT STREET, ROOM 110 CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301-3941 (OFFICE OF THE CLERK Telephone Tames R. Starr 603-225-1423 (Clerk of Cour May 19, 2003 David R. Amos 153 Alvin Avenue Milton, MA 02186 Re: C. 03-203-M;_MeLaughlin v. Kickham, et al Dear Mr. Amos: Enclosed please find your answer and attachments/exhibits that you filed with the court on Friday, May 16, 2003. The above-captioned case has been closed in this office, and we are returning all materials back to you. Very truly yours, James R. Starr, Clerk wy, teat“. Swett Judith A. Barrett” Depaaty Clerk Enclosuresus STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 1 ge GOURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FILED JAM A. McLAUGHLIN, CIVIL ACTIGNINO 5 Py: 2 10203-M. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) DAVID R. AMOS, ) JEAN F. O'MEARA, ) FRANCIS KICKHAM, ) WILLIAM J. KICKHAM, ) ) d ) BARBARA J. KICKHAM, Defendants. ANSWER OF THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R, AMOS Now comes the Defendant, David R. Amos, and answers, the complaint of the Plaintiff, James A. McLaughlin as follows 1 Admitted 2. Admitted Admitted. 4, Admitted 5. The address stated is not that of the Defendant, William J Kickham 11 is the address of his criminal cousins’ Law Offices. The senior partner is Charles J. Kickham Jr. He assisted William J. Kickham to close the estate of Elaine G. Kickham by act of fraud practiced against the court. The Norfolk Probate and Family Court assisted the wrongs of the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr., in the first instance by removing the name of Jean F O'Meara and that of her cousin, Barbara J. Kickham, from the court records as interested parties of the Trust of Elaine G. Kickham. Upon the creation of the fraudulent trustUNITED STAT pDISTRIC COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JAMES A. McLAUGHLIN, Plaintift, DAVID R. AMOS, FRANCIS KIC! WILLIAM J. KICKITAM, BARBARA J. KICKHAM, Defendants. A Now comes the Det jaintiff, James A Metaughlin as tallows 1 Admitted 2 Admitted 3 Admitted A Admitted 5 The address stated is n ot his criminal cousins’ Law Oltices ‘The sesiur partner is Chatles J Kickh assisted William J Kickham to elose the estate of Eline G Kick WER OF THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R. AMC that of the Deficndant, William J Kickhas ’ CIVIL ACTION NO. ) CV-00205 ) ) yl ORIGINAL FILED ON MAY 15 2003 ) ) ) i U.S. DISTRICT COURT : DISTRICT OF NH ) ndant, David R Adios, aad answers, the comphiint of the Iris the address Jee ni by act of fraud practiced against the court, The Norfolk Probate and Family Court assisted the wrongs of the lawyer, Charles J Kiekham Jr in the first instance by remaying the name of Jean F O'Meara and that of her cousin, Batharu J. Kickham from the e0 parties of the Trust of Ela eG Kickham Upon the creation of the fraudulent trustUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Case# CO 3- 2OR -p/a EXHIBITS OFFERED BY: NUMBER/LETTER cheb toe 2 Ree yk bi TB Twp Ki covtr te PE (257 yoitat © gee tty Bybi bto tops Rex ot VecimetstI1c ad OR GINAL FILED ON MAY 15 2003 DISTRICT COURT ISTRICT OF NH ‘USDCNH-25 (2-96)March 24, 2004 Thomas P. Colantuono, Michael Gunnison and Gretchen L. Witt U.S. District Attorney's Office 55 Pleasant Street, Room 312 Concord, NH 03301-3904 Phone 603 225-1552 RE: Corruption Sirs and Madam, Please find enclosed exact copies of all documents etc. that I promised I would send to each member Federal Court Advisory Committee in NH. There no need to elaborate, I emailed and then called each of you on the phone two weeks later. Your varied responses to me were interesting to say the least. The only thing that all of you except one shared in common is that you all denied receiving my enclosed emails. The one of you that did admit to knowledge of my emails claimed to have only seen one of them. I only acted as the court suggested and the email addresses were taken from the court's website, It is not my fault you choose to ignore me. I have made certain that my actions are done by the rules while every officer of the court that T have encountered so far has chosen not to uphold the law. Tam truly amazed at how bad things really are. I have recorded your first reaction to my legitimate concerns about the actions of the US District Court in New Hampshire Twill now await your next response to this letter. May I suggest that your review the enclosed documents and then go to the federal court and view the dockets for yourself and ask a few questions and then get back to me with your findings. Tf you have drawn one penny for your services from the taxpayer for your services to the federal court then you should be well aware of Title 28 Section 530B. Please find enclosed an exact copy of all documents sent today to REBA and Senator John Edwards and some other documents that should be on file in US District Court but have somehow been caused to disappear from the public record, The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as of ficers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. No matter what you do T will be filing a complaint against the USA. At the very least T have now made you all witnesses to my pending complaint. Rest assured that I will be summoning you to testify to what you now know to be true. My questions to you and your answers to me will be of great concern to all that think lawyers are ethical. However it is all of our civil rights that are gt stake in the outcome of that complaint. a / f Tat Cyallin Court® Ce VEYA A Mn® David R. Amos PO Box 2 South Acworth, NH 03607Federal Court Advisory Committee NH The Federal Court Advisory Committee was formed in March of 2000 to act as a sounding board on many issues facing the court. The committee will, while acting closely with the Federal Practice Section, also function as the liaison between the bench and bar on issues important to federal practitioners. If you have an issue you believe should be raised, you may e-mail any one of the members, The Committee is composed of eight members who serve a term of three years along with five permanent representatives for the Federal Defender, Attorney General's Office, United States Attorney, and CJA Panel, as well as the chairperson of the Federal Practice Section. Membership Roster and E-Mail Address Michael J. Connolly mconnolly@haslaw.com Debra Weiss Ford dwford@dmb.com Wilbur A. Glahn, IIT _bill.glahn@melane.com Cathy J. Green cathy@green-utter.com Michael Gunnison michael gunnison@usdoj gov Michael P, Hall mhall@8Onhlaw.com Edward M. Kaplan ekaplan@sulloway.com Bjorn Lange bjorn_lange@fd.org Daniel S. Mullen dmullen@doj,state.nh.us Scott W. O'Connell soconnell@nixonpeabody.comé/A. Emily Gray Rice egr@orr-reno.com David P. Slawsky dslawsky@upton-hatfield.com Lawrence A. Vogelman lav@si mn Gretchen L. Witt gretchen,witt@usdoj.govGOVERNOR & ATTORNEY GENERAL MOVE FORWARD ON EMPLOYEE CODE OF CONDUCT CONCORD - In December, Governor Benson received a recommendation to revise the framework of conduct for state employees from the Efficiency Commission. A one-day seminar on appropriate workplace behavior for upper management officials was also held by the Attorney General's of fice. In response to the recommendations of the Efficiency Commission and seminar, Governor Craig Benson and Attorney General Peter Heed announced today they are moving forward on a Code of Conduct Website for State employees. This is another step by Governor Benson to ensure state employees act ina respectful and responsible manner. “Tam pleased to move forward in providing further guidelines to state employees,” Governor Craig Benson said. “I attended the recent seminar for state management officials and was surprised to learn how many different interpretations of state law people have. This website will provide clarity and reduce confusion.” ‘The Attorney General hosted an “Ethics & Sexual Harassment Seminar for Upper Management" on December 9, 2003. Governor Benson and Attorney General Heed gave opening remarks at the seminar, which included presentations on “Sexual Harassment” by Raymond Perry and an "Ethics Overview" by Daniel Mullen of the New Hampshire Attorney Generals Office In December, the Efficiency Commission recommended an overarching “Code of Conduct" be designed and implemented to provide the vision and rationale for employees and officials to act with the highest standard and integrity. Also, last September, Governor Benson issued a “Code of Conduct" for all Executive Branch employees and officials, The Governor has asked the Attorney General to create a website tutorial that will provide specific guidelines for state employees on workplace conduct. The tutorial will eventually become available through the Department of Administrative Services website. The site will offer specific rules and regulations to state employees. Attorney General Peter Heed said, “The Governor has asked me to put together a comprehensive web based tutorial for state employees. Once finished, this website will provide useful information on appropriate behavior. My office will work to ensure the site is up and running as soon as possible,” Daniel S. Mullen Thomas P. Colantuono, Attorney General's Office Michael Gunnison and Gretchen L. Witt 33 Capitol Street U.S. District Attorney's Office Concord, NH 03301 55 Pleasant Street, Room 312 Telephone (603) 271-3658 Concord, NH 03301-3904 Fax (603) 271-2110 Phone 603 225-1552Bjorn Lange Federal Public Defenders Ralph Pill Building 22 Bridge Street Concord, NH 03301 Phone 603 226-7360 Debra Weiss Ford Devine, Millimet & Branch 216 Lafayette Road, Suite 103 PO Box 974 North Hampton, NH 03862 Phone 603 964-4990 Fax 603 964-4997 Cathy J. Green Green & Utter 764 Chestnut Street Manchester, NH 03104 Phone: (603) 669-8446 Fax: (603) 669-9330 Edward M. Kaplan, Sulloway & Hollis, P.L.L.C. 9 Capitol Street, P.O. Box 1256, Concord, NH 03302-1256 Phone 603 224-2341 Emily 6. Rice Orr & Reno, ‘One Eagle Square, P.O. Box 3550, Concord, NH 03302-3550 Phone 603 223-9112 David P. Slawsky Michael J. Connolly Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP 43 North Main Street Concord, NH 03301-4934 Phone 603 225-4334 Fax 603 224-8350 Wilbur A. Glahn, TTT McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton City Hall Plaza 900 Elm Street Manchester, NH 03105-0326 Phone 603 628-1469 Fax 603 625-5650 Michael P. Hall Hall, Hess, Stewart, Murphy & Brown 80 Merrimack Street Manchester, NH 03101 Phone. 603 669-8080 Fax 603 669-0903 Scott O'Connell Nixon Peabody LLP 889 Elm Street Manchester, NH 03101 Phone 603 628-4087 Fax 603 628-4040 Lawrence A. Vogelman Upton & Hatfield, LLP Shuchman, Krause & Vogelman 10 Centre Street 42 Hampton Road P.O, Box 1090 P.O. Box 220 Concord, NH 03302-1090 Exeter, NH 03833 Phone 603 224-7791 Phone 603 778-1984 Fax 603 224-0320 Fax 603 778-9216