Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
discussions. Respectfully, I request that you engage in learning activities with thoughtful
reflection. There is no one way or right way to conduct a research study. There are many
theoretical and methodological positions from which to work. In this course we will work to
understand a variety of positions and engage with different ways of thinking about research. This
does not mean that you may not disagree with one another or with me about these differences.
Indeed, constructive debate can often refine and deepen a particular argument or position. I hope
we will work on cultivating a space that generates respectful, sensitive, and empathetic
understandings, both as we engage with one another and with the readings. Lastly, if I am
teaching and you are not learning, then Im not teaching. I welcome feedback and encourage
your participation in an informal mid-semester evaluation. What we study is a shared experience,
and one aim of this class is to cultivate a community of learners and researchers. In this
community I position myself as a learner as well as a researcher and instructor.
COURSE EXPECTATIONS
1. Enthusiastically and actively participate each week in discussion boards and weekly
activities.
2. Complete all weekly assignments thoughtfully and on time, having read the assigned
materials thoroughly and critically.
3. Check your email & MyEducationLab DAILY for announcements.
4. Because MyEducationLab will be used as a source of information for the course, please
familiarize yourself with the system and seek any necessary training directly from the
Pearson Education website (http://pearsonmylabandmastering.com/students/)
5. As adults it is your choice how to participate in class. I am not in the position to give or
withhold permission for you to miss class. I simply ask that you let me know in advance if
we should not expect you for a particular class session. Also, please let me know in advance
about any irregularities in your participation. Participation is 40% of your final grade and to
earn full points for participation requires completing all weekly activities and meeting the
expectations outlined in this syllabus.
6. There are no excused delays for assignment completion.
7. No incompletes will be given.
8. If you plagiarize, you will receive a zero (0) on the assignment, and I will contact your
academic advisor for further consultation.
EVALUATION, FEEDBACK, GRADING
The following grading scale applies:
A is 100 - 90 points, B is 89 - 80 points, C is 79 - 70 points, D is 69-60, F is below 60
**For graduate credit, the grade in a course must be a minimum grade of C. (GSU 2011-2012
Graduate Catalog)
Grades will be based on preparation and active participation along with timely completion of all
assignments and activities. Points will be given for each learning activity. Participation is
extremely important. In order to gain the most from this course, it is important to be an active
participant online each week and you are encouraged to attend our optional scheduled chat
sessions. In your work, I am looking for evidence of understanding and the application of the
Davis / 7130 01F_Fall 2015 / Updated 8/26/15 / Page 3 of 8
concepts and processes learned and discussed in class; critical reflection and responses to issues
and concepts; clarity of expression and explicit connections among ideas; complete work with no
or few grammatical and spelling errors. Late assignments will not be accepted.
A note regarding letter grades:
The defining characteristic of a successful graduate student is not their GPA. Nevertheless, many
graduate students continue to be highly concerned about their grades. Thus, I am including this
short explanation of my philosophy on letter grades. Completing all assignments and meeting the
expectations of the course constitutes B work; truly outstanding work constitutes A work;
and failing to meet the minimum expectations will result in a grade of C or lower. This class is
primarily skills-based and therefore time intensive. It is possibly very different from other
courses you have taken. Spending a lot of time on course requirements (or having a history of
being an A student) will not, in and of itself, result in an A grade for this class. I encourage
you to do your best and to concentrate on the knowledge and skills base you are gaining rather
than on the letter grade.
GRADED ASSIGNMENTS
In order to become a critical consumer of research you need to experience:
The readings and assignments for this course have been designed to provide you with this type of
experience and to assist you in becoming a critical consumer of research. Following is a
breakdown of activities and weighted percentages for assignments in this class.
I.
Active Participation
40 %
Introductory Survey
Weekly Activities in MyEducationLab (various points)
II.
Discussion Boards
12 discussion boards (5 points each)
30 %
III.
Article Critiques
Quantitative Article Critique (15 points)
Qualitative Article Critique (15 points)
30 %
ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES
**More details on each assignment will be provided in MyEducationLab under Course
Resources. I will review all of the assignments in detail in an introductory video that will
be posted online.
Active Participation (40%)
This is a graduate level course and you are expected to complete all readings in order to
participate in class discussions and learning activities. Your participation in the introductory
Davis / 7130 01F_Fall 2015 / Updated 8/26/15 / Page 4 of 8
survey and weekly learning activities count towards your participation points in this class. Your
scores on the weekly activities will be weighted at 40% of your grade in the class. You are
encouraged not to treat the activities each week like tests. Instead look at them as learning
activities. Open them up, look at the questions and use your resources to answer the questions.
The activities are not timed and you may come back to the activities as often as you like before
submitting them.
Discussion Boards (30%)
There is a discussion board each week. Each discussion board is worth 5 points. The discussion
boards are weighted at 30% of your grade. You are expected to complete your initial post by
Thursday of each week and to respond to classmates posts from there onward. I do not require
you to respond to a certain number of posts because I believe in a graduate level course you
should know what is acceptable. Responses such as I agree with you, or Good point do not
facilitate dialogue online and are not acceptable posts. Instead, I encourage you to read the posts
that interest you most and respond thoughtfully to those posts. Many times using a technique
called Asking back will get a dialogue going. So, instead of just making a comment, as a
question back to the writer. Ask them for examples, more detail, or alternative ways of thinking
about the topic. I will post more about this in the Ask Amelia Board and will be modeling this
for you in the beginning.
*A note regarding discussion boards: Discussion boards will be an integral part class
format. Be considerate and appropriate when using the discussion board. It is neither a
public forum nor a limited public forum. I, as the instructor, have the right to remove any
message for the purposes of saving space, focusing the attention of students on relevant
materials, and avoiding material inappropriate for a classroom. On this last note, with
freedom comes responsibility. Please keep in mind as you contribute to the discussion
board that not everyone comes from the same background, or shares the same values and
ideals. Please be appropriate, professional, and considerate of others. If you have any
questions on this matter, contact me for clarification. I reserve the right to delete or
remove any posting that I deem inappropriate or redundant.
Article Critiques (30%)
One of the most important objectives of this course is for you to develop the ability to evaluate
research. Empirical research (whether quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods) varies greatly
in quality. Not all research is good research, and we therefore have to adopt a critical and
evaluative approach when we read it. The article critiques are designed to help you become
more critical consumers of research by introducing you to effective techniques for identifying
key features of the research as well as evaluating the appropriateness of methods used and
validity of the research findings. *Additional information on completing the article critiques can
be found in MyEducationLab under Assignment Details.
You will complete two (2) article critiques for this class: (1) Quantitative and (2) Qualitative.
You will be given one quantitative article and one qualitative article to critique. You do not get
to choose the article you will critique. The articles have been chosen for you and have been
posted in MyEducationLab. You are to download the articles, read the articles, and the critique
each article. Each critique is worth 15 points. The article critiques are weighted at 30% of your
grade.
Davis / 7130 01F_Fall 2015 / Updated 8/26/15 / Page 5 of 8
Week 2
08/24/15
Content
Introduction to Educational
Research
Quantitative vs. Qualitative
Research
Required Readings
Assignment Due/Remarks
Syllabus
Creswell, Ch. 1
Hamre & Pianta,
2005*
Sleeter, 1983*
MyEducationLab Activities
Discussion Board
Week/Date
Content
Required Readings
Assignment Due/Remarks
Week 3
08/31/15
Reviewing Literature
Library Resources and
Database Searches
Abstracting Articles
Creswell, Ch. 3
MyEducationLab Activities
Explore Library Resources
Discussion Board
Week 4
09/07/15
Evaluating Research
Research Ethics
Creswell, Ch. 9
Guillemin & Gillam,
2004
Week 5
09/14/15
Quantitative Research
Data Collection
Creswell, Ch. 5
MyEducationLab Activities
Discussion Board
Week 6
09/21/15
Quantitative Research
Analyzing and Interpreting
Data
Creswell, Ch. 6
MyEducationLab Activities
Discussion Board
Week 7
09/28/15
Creswell, Ch. 10
MyEducationLab Activities
Discussion Board
Week 8
10/05/15
MyEducationLab Activities
Complete online mid-term evaluation
Week 9
10/12/15
Qualitative Research
Data Collection
Creswell, Ch. 7
MyEducationLab Activities
Post Interview Transcript
Discussion Board
Week 10
10/19/15
Qualitative Research
Analyzing and Interpreting
Data
Creswell, Ch. 8
MyEducationLab Activities
Post Coding Practice
Discussion Board
Week 11
10/26/15
Creswell, Chp.13
MyEducationLab Activities
Discussion Board
Week 12
11/02/15
MyEducationLab Activities
Week 13
11/09/15
MyEducationLab Activities
Discussion Board
Complete End-of-Course Evaluation
Week/Date
Week 14
11/16/15
Content
Course Wrap Up
Required Readings
No Readings
Week 15
11/23/15
Assignment Due/Remarks
Discussion Board
Complete End-of-Course Evaluation
Thanksgiving Break