Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • Passivity, Paradox, and Change in Family Systems

    Hochgeladen von

    Mircea Radu
    11 Ansichten9 Seiten
    Cuplu Familie Psihologie

    Originaltitel

    Passivity, Paradox, And Change in Family Systems

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    Cuplu Familie Psihologie

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    11 Ansichten9 Seiten

    Passivity, Paradox, and Change in Family Systems

    Hochgeladen von

    Mircea Radu
    Cuplu Familie Psihologie

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 9
    Passivity, Paradox, and Change in Family Systems Robert Musvey Abstract Problem families which respond to treat- zicnt with passivity are considered as resit- ing change in the Family system. When di- rect methods of therapy have proven to he uunsueeessfnl, strategie. paradoxical inter- yentions may break the symbiosis in the family and permit change and growth. The compatibility and utility of such TA’ con- ‘cepts and approaches as script, coun- terseript messages, injunctions permission, and stroking ore considered and illustrated. Three case studies iMustrating wnderstand- ing strategic therapy from a TA perspective areincluded. TA ean be used directly with famities (McClendon, 1977; Bader, 1982; Bader, MeCiendon, Kaas, and Roper, 1982), Par of the power ard attractiveness of TA therspists stems from their willingtess to incorporate other approaches when appropriate (e.g., James and Jongeward, 1977; Goulding and Goulding, 1978). Twill discuss how the use of paradox i strategic Family therapy is eompati- ble with TA. ‘When a family successfully responds to di- rect TA ioterventons. the members change ther seript positions and give up games wita their scpporting rackets ts they grow in spon- tuneity, intimacy, and aweroaess. However, some families continually disqualify therapeu tic efforts and seem “stuck” in theit losing transactional patterns. A family thal is not conimmunicating constructively or relating posi- tively appears “locked into” second- and third- degree games, stamp collecting, racket feel ings, and injunctions leading to a negative setipt payofl. In general, the capacities for positive stoking and growth are inhibited, & problem family overemphasizes relationship Vol 13, No.1, Saruary 1983 “Take care of me”) and script Help me Fit ‘my injunctions") contracts (Beme, 1961):0 the

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen